Blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, progress and prediction

XUQing, YAOFang, SHENLiming, NIJiazuan, LIUQiong

Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2019, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 444-449.

PDF(625 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders      Editor in chief: Jun WANG

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(625 KB)
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2019, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 444-449. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2019.03.011

Blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, progress and prediction

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a major neurodegenerative disease that causes dementia in elderly people. The etiology of AD is complicated and its progress is slow in a long period. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention are important strategies for the prevention and treatment of AD. The classical method for clinical diagnosis of AD is to detect the biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, it is very difficult to collect the CSF sample and thus to use this method widely. Meanwhile, those biomarkers in CSF are present at very low levels in blood samples that requires highly sensitive method for the detection. In recent years, the researches of AD biomarkers focus on two aspects: one is to establish new detection methods with high sensitivity and specificity, and the other is to explore and discover some new biomarkers in blood. In this paper, the latest progress of AD biomarkers in human peripheral blood is reviewed briefly, and the possibility of its application in clinical diagnosis is analyzed.

Key words

Alzheimer's disease (AD) / Biomarker / Blood / Bioinfbrmatics

Cite this article

Download Citations
XU Qing , YAO Fang , SHEN Liming , et al . Blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, progress and prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. 2019, 2(3): 444-449 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2019.03.011

References

[1]
Farber, JF, Schmitt, FA, Logue, PE, et al. Predicting intellectual level from the Mini-Mental State Examination[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988, 36(6): 509-510.
The Mini-Mental State Examination and the WAIS-R were administered to 105 patients in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. MMSE scores correlated 0.83 with full scale IQ, which indicates that the MMSE may be a reasonable alternative measure of overall intellectual functioning in Alzheimer patients, for whom more extensive testing is impractical or clinically inappropriate. The prediction formula is presented, along with a prediction table. Folstein and McHugh report that, as the WAIS Performance IQ falls below 100 in demented patients, that there is a concomitant decline in the MMSE below 24 points. Data from our laboratory further support what some clinicians have long suggested, ie, that in those cases where only the mental status examination can be given, this short test can provide a reasonably valid and reliable prediction of the patient's IQ score.
[2]
Frisoni, FG, Fox, NC, Jack, CR, Jr, et al. The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease[J]. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010, 6(2).
[3]
Wortmann, M. Dementia: a global health priority - highlights from an ADI and World Health Organization report[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2012, 4(5): 40.
Alzheimer's Disease International is the worldwide federation of Alzheimer associations that represent people with dementia and their families. Alzheimer's Disease International has commissioned a number of World Alzheimer Reports since 2009 and was involved in the recently launched report Dementia: A Public Health Priority by the World Health Organization. From these reports, we can learn about the growing impact of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias on our societies and the need to take action. Developing national Alzheimer plans is a key tool for this action.
[4]
Fleisher, AS, Raman, R, Siemers, ER, et al. Phase 2 safety trial targeting amyloid beta production with a gamma-secretase inhibitor in Alzheimer disease[J]. Arch Neurol, 2008, 65(8): 1031-1038.
[5]
Iliff, JJ, Wang, M, Liao, Y, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2012, 4(147): 147ralll.
[6]
Zainaghi, IA, Forlenza, OV, Gattaz, WF, et al. Abnormal APP processing in platelets of patients with Alzheimer's disease: correlations with membrane fluidity and cognitive decline[J]. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2007, 192(4): 547-553.
[7]
Yaffe, K, Weston, A, Graff-Radford, NR, et al. Association of plasma beta-amyloid level and cognitive reserve with subsequent cognitive decline[J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(3):261-266.
[8]
Gustaw, KA, Garrett, MR, Lee, HG, et al. Antigen-antibody dissociation in Alzheimer disease: a novel approach to diagnosis[J]. J Neurochem, 2008, 106(3): 1350-1356.
[9]
Klunk, WE, Wang, Y, Huang, GF, et al. The binding of 2-(4-methylaminophenyl) benzothiazole to postmortem brain homogenates is dominated by the amyloid component[J]. J Neurosci, 2003, 23(6): 2086-2092.
[10]
Gatz, M, Reynolds, CA, Fratiglioni, L, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease[J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006, 63(2): 168-174.
[11]
Toledo, JB, Vanderstichele, H, Figurski, M, et al. Factors affecting Ab eta plasma levels and their utility as biomarkers in ADNI[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2011, 122(4): 401-413.
Previous studies of Aβ plasma as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) obtained conflicting results. We here included 715 subjects with baseline Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) plasma measurement (50% with 4 serial annual measurements): 205 cognitively normal controls (CN), 348 patients mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 162 with AD. We assessed the factors that modified their concentrations and correlated these values with PIB PET, MRI and tau and Aβ(1-42) measures in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Association between Aβ and diagnosis (baseline and prospective) was assessed. A number of health conditions were associated with altered concentrations of plasma Aβ. The effect of age differed according to AD stage. Plasma Aβ(1-42) showed mild correlation with other biomarkers of Aβ pathology and were associated with infarctions in MRI. Longitudinal measurements of Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) plasma levels showed modest value as a prognostic factor for clinical progression. Our longitudinal study of complementary measures of Aβ pathology (PIB, CSF and plasma Aβ) and other biomarkers in a cohort with an extensive neuropsychological battery is significant because it shows that plasma Aβ measurements have limited value for disease classification and modest value as prognostic factors over the 3-year follow-up. However, with longer follow-up, within subject plasma Aβ measurements could be used as a simple and minimally invasive screen to identify those at increased risk for AD. Our study emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the biology and dynamics of plasma Aβ as well as the need for longer term studies to determine the clinical utility of measuring plasma Aβ.
[12]
Brureau, A, Blanchard-Bregeon, V, Pech, C, et al. NF-L in cerebrospinal fluid and serum is a biomarker of neuronal damage in an inducible mouse model of neurodegeneration[J]. Neurobiol Dis, 2017, 104:73-84.
[13]
Zhang, H, Nq, KP, Therriault, J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau, visinin-like protein-1, and chitinase-3-like protein 1 in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease[J]. Transl Neurodegener, 2018, 7: 23.
Background: Visinin-like protein-1 (VILIP-1) and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1 or YKL-40) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are newly discovered markers indicating neuronal damage and microglial activation, respectively. Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) reflects the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is useful as diagnostic markers for AD. However, it is unknown whether these biomarkers have similar or complementary information in AD. Methods: We stratified 121 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database into cognitively normal (CN), stable mild cognitive impairment (sMCI), progressive MCI (pMCI), and dementia due to AD. Analysis of covariance (ANOVA) and chi-square analyses, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression models were performed to test the demographic, associations between biomarkers, and diagnostic accuracies, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the effects of CSF amyloid-beta (A beta) on above biomarkers within diagnostic groups, the combination of diagnostic group and A beta status as predictor, and CSF biomarkers as predictors of AD features, including cognition measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and brain structure and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: P-tau, VILIP-1, and YKL-40 were all predictors of AD diagnosis, but combinations of biomarkers did not improve the diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.924 for p-tau, VILIP-1, and YKL-40) compared to p-tau (AUC 0.922). P-tau and VILIP-1 were highly correlated (r = 0.639, p < 0.001) and strongly associated with A beta pathology across clinical stages of AD, while YKL-40 was correlated with A beta pathology in CN and AD groups. VILIP-1 was associated with acceleration of cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy, and expansion of ventricles in longitudinal analyses. YKL-40 was associated with hippocampal atrophy at baseline and follow-up, while p-tau was only associated with worsening WMH at baseline. Conclusions: CSF levels of p-tau, VILIP-1, and YKL-40 may have utility for discriminating between cognitively normal subjects and patients with AD. Increased levels of both VILIP-1 and YKL-40 may be associated with disease degeneration. These CSF biomarkers should be considered for future assessment in the characterization of the natural history of AD.
[14]
Li, D, Misialek, JR, Boerwinkle, E, et al. Plasma phospholipids and prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia in the ARIC Neuro cognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)[J]. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016, 3: 73-82.
[15]
Teunissen, CE, de Vente, J, Steinbusch, HW, et al. Biochemical markers related to Alzheimer's dementia in serum and cerebrospinal fluid[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2002, 23(4):485-508.
The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is currently based on clinical and neuropsychological examination. To date there is no blood test available that can discriminate dementia patients from healthy individuals. In the present paper, an overview of the current state of knowledge on biologic markers in serum (plasma) and CSF is presented. The combination of characteristic plaque markers tau and amyloid bèta may constitute a specific and sensitive CSF marker for AD. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and antibodies in CSF may be a marker for severe neurodegeneration. CSF concentrations of the oxidative stress markers 3-nitrotyrosine, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine and isoprostanes are increased in AD patients. Serum 24S-OH-cholesterol may be an early whereas glial fibrillary acidic protein autoantibody level may be a late marker for neurodegeneration. To date, serum alpha(1)-Antichymotripsin concentration is the most convincing marker for CNS inflammation. Increased serum homocysteine concentrations have also been consistently reported in AD. In summary, a large overlap in mean concentrations has been observed in studies comparing AD patients with healthy controls for single markers. These studies together support the theory of testing several serum markers in combination for the diagnosis of AD.
[16]
Schmidt, R, Schmidt, H, Curb, JD, et al. Early inflammation and dementia: a 25-year follow-up of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study[J]. Ann Neurol, 2002, 52(2): 168-174.
[17]
Padmanabhan, J, Levy, M, Dickson, DW, et al. Alpha 1 - antichymotrypsin, an inflammatory protein overexpressed in Alzheimer's disease brain, induces tau phosphorylation in neurons[J]. Brain, 2006, 129(11): 3020-3034.
[18]
Liao, PC, Yu, L, Kuo, CC, et al. Proteomics analysis of plasma for potential biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Proteomics Clin Appl, 2007, 1(5): 506-512.
[19]
Leszek, J, Malyszczak, K, Bartys, A, et al. Analysis of serum of patients with Alzheimer's disease for the level of advanced glycation end pro ducts[J]. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2006, 21(5):360-365.
[20]
Zuliani, G, Donnorso, MP, Bosi, C, et al. Plasma 24S-hydroxycholesterol levels in elderly subjects with late onset Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia: a case-control study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2011, 11: 121.
[21]
Schrijvers, EM, Koudstaal, PJ, Hofman, A, et al. Plasma clusterin and the risk of Alzheimer disease[J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(13): 1322-1326.
Variants in the clusterin gene are associated with the risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) and clusterin levels have been found to be increased in brain and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with AD. Plasma clusterin was reported to be associated with brain atrophy, baseline disease severity, and rapid clinical progression in patients with AD.To evaluate the potential of plasma clusterin as a biomarker of the presence, severity, and risk of AD.A case-cohort study nested within the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort study conducted in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Plasma levels of clusterin were measured at baseline (1997-1999) in 60 individuals with prevalent AD, a random subcohort of 926 participants, and an additional 156 participants diagnosed with AD during follow-up until January 1, 2007 (mean [SD], 7.2 [2.3] years).Prevalent AD, severity of AD measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and the risk of developing AD during follow-up.The likelihood of prevalent AD increased with increasing plasma levels of clusterin (odds ratio [OR] per SD increase of plasma clusterin level, 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.20; adjusted for age, sex, education level, apolipoprotein E status, diabetes, smoking, coronary heart disease, and hypertension). Among patients with AD, higher clusterin levels were associated with more severe disease (adjusted difference in MMSE score per SD increase in clusterin levels, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.70 to -0.02; P =.047). Plasma clusterin levels were not related to the risk of incident AD during total follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17; P for trend =.77) or within 3 years of baseline (adjusted HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84-1.42; P for trend =.65).Plasma clusterin levels were significantly associated with baseline prevalence and severity of AD, but not with incidence of AD.
[22]
Kanekiyo, T, Xu, H, Bu, G, et al. ApoE and Ab eta in Alzheimer's disease: accidental encounters or partn- ers?[J] Neuron. 2014, 81(4): 740-754.
[23]
Lewczuk, P, Lelental, N, Spitzer, P, et al. Amyloid-beta 42/40 cerebrospinal fluid concentration ratio in the diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease: validation of two novel assaysf[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2015, 43(1): 183-191.
The increasing role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is reflected in recently published diagnostic and/or research criteria. A growing body of evidence suggests better diagnostic performance of the amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40 CSF concentration ratio compared to the Aβ42 concentration alone.(a) to analytically validate two novel ELISAs capable to measure Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 in the CSF, and (b) to compare the diagnostic accuracies of Aβ1-42 and Aβ42/40 ratio.In this study, (a) the novel Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 ELISAs (IBL International GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) have been analytically validated, and (b) a clinical study has been performed comparing the diagnostic performance of the CSF Aβ42/40 concentration ratio and the CSF Aβ42 concentration.In the analytical part of the study, only marginal cross-reactivity (Aβ1-42 versus Aβ1-40) was observed; recoveries were in the range of 85-100% for the samples diluted 1 : 20-1 : 640 (Aβ1-40), and 92-104% for the samples diluted 1 : 20-1 : 320 (Aβ1-42). For Aβ1-40, the intra-assay imprecision was 2.1%, the inter-assay imprecision was 4.4%, and the inter-lot imprecision was 5.4 %. For Aβ1-42, the numbers were 3.1%, 6.2%, and 6.9%, respectively. The goodness of the fit of the average standard curves was >0.99 for both assays, and the imprecision of the optical densities in ten repetitions of the standard curves was ≤5% for all standards. In the clinical part, at the cut off value 691 pg/mL, Aβ1-42 showed sensitivity and specificity of 69.3% and 88.9%, respectively, whereas at the cut off value 0.06, the Aβ42/40 ratio showed significantly improved performance with sensitivity and specificity of 93.3% and 100%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for Aβ42/40 (0.974) was highly significantly larger compared to Aβ1-42 concentration ROC curve (0.827, p < 0.0001).(a) the novel Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 ELISA assays characterize with very good analytical performance; (b) we reconfirm that the CSF Aβ42/40 concentration ratio shows significantly better diagnostic performance compared to the CSF Aβ1-42 concentration alone.
[24]
Lewczuk, P, Matzen, A, Blennow, K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42/40 corresponds better than Abeta-42 to Amyloid PET in Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2017, 55(2): 813-822.
Decreased concentrations of amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and increased retention of Aβ tracers in the brain on positron emission tomography (PET) are considered the earliest biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, a proportion of cases show discrepancies between the results of the two biomarker modalities which may reflect inter-individual differences in Aβ metabolism. The CSF Aβ42/40 ratio seems to be a more accurate biomarker of clinical AD than CSF Aβ42 alone.We tested whether CSF Aβ42 alone or the Aβ42/40 ratio corresponds better with amyloid PET status and analyzed the distribution of cases with discordant CSF-PET results.CSF obtained from a mixed cohort (n = 200) of cognitively normal and abnormal research participants who had undergone amyloid PET within 12 months (n = 150 PET-negative, n = 50 PET-positive according to a previously published cut-off) was assayed for Aβ42 and Aβ40 using two recently developed immunoassays. Optimal CSF cut-offs for amyloid positivity were calculated, and concordance was tested by comparison of the areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and McNemar's test for paired proportions.CSF Aβ42/40 corresponded better than Aβ42 with PET results, with a larger proportion of concordant cases (89.4% versus 74.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and a larger AUC (0.936 versus 0.814, respectively, p < 0.0001) associated with the ratio. For both CSF biomarkers, the percentage of CSF-abnormal/PET-normal cases was larger than that of CSF-normal/PET-abnormal cases.The CSF Aβ42/40 ratio is superior to Aβ42 alone as a marker of amyloid-positivity by PET. We hypothesize that this increase in performance reflects the ratio compensating for general between-individual variations in CSF total Aβ.
[25]
Tang, N, Kepp, KP. Abeta42/Abeta40 ratios of presenilin 1 mutations correlate with clinical onset of Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2018, 66(3): 939-945.
[26]
Akinori, N, Kaneko, N, Villemagne, VL, et al. High performance plasma amyloid-biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Nature, 2018, 554(7691).
[27]
Lim, CZJ, Zhang, Y, Chen, Y, et al. Subtyping of circulating exosome-bound amyloid beta reflects brain plaque deposition[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1):1144.
[28]
Colombo, M, Raposo, G, Thery, C, et al. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles[J]. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2014, 30: 255-289.
In the 1980s, exosomes were described as vesicles of endosomal origin secreted from reticulocytes. Interest increased around these extracellular vesicles, as they appeared to participate in several cellular processes. Exosomes bear proteins, lipids, and RNAs, mediating intercellular communication between different cell types in the body, and thus affecting normal and pathological conditions. Only recently, scientists acknowledged the difficulty of separating exosomes from other types of extracellular vesicles, which precludes a clear attribution of a particular function to the different types of secreted vesicles. To shed light into this complex but expanding field of science, this review focuses on the definition of exosomes and other secreted extracellular vesicles. Their biogenesis, their secretion, and their subsequent fate are discussed, as their functions rely on these important processes.
[29]
Valadi, H, Ekstrom, K, Bossios, A, et al. Exosome- mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2007, 9(6): 654-659.
Exosomes are vesicles of endocytic origin released by many cells. These vesicles can mediate communication between cells, facilitating processes such as antigen presentation. Here, we show that exosomes from a mouse and a human mast cell line (MC/9 and HMC-1, respectively), as well as primary bone marrow-derived mouse mast cells, contain RNA. Microarray assessments revealed the presence of mRNA from approximately 1300 genes, many of which are not present in the cytoplasm of the donor cell. In vitro translation proved that the exosome mRNAs were functional. Quality control RNA analysis of total RNA derived from exosomes also revealed presence of small RNAs, including microRNAs. The RNA from mast cell exosomes is transferable to other mouse and human mast cells. After transfer of mouse exosomal RNA to human mast cells, new mouse proteins were found in the recipient cells, indicating that transferred exosomal mRNA can be translated after entering another cell. In summary, we show that exosomes contain both mRNA and microRNA, which can be delivered to another cell, and can be functional in this new location. We propose that this RNA is called "exosomal shuttle RNA" (esRNA).
[30]
Chiu, MJ, Yang, SY, Homg, HE, et al. Combined plasma biomarkers fbr diagnosing mild cognition impairment and Alzheimer's diseasef[J]. ACS Chem Newosci, 2013, 4(12): 1530-1536.
[31]
Oliver, P, Schultz, SA, Apel, A, et al. Serum neurofil- ament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease[J]. NatMed, 2019.
[32]
Wilson, DH, Rissin, DM, Kan, CW, et al. The Simoa HD-1 analyzer: a novel fully automated digital immunoassay analyzer with single-molecule sensitivity and multiplexing[J]. J Lab Autom, 2016, 21(4): 533-547.
Disease detection at the molecular level is driving the emerging revolution of early diagnosis and treatment. A challenge facing the field is that protein biomarkers for early diagnosis can be present in very low abundance. The lower limit of detection with conventional immunoassay technology is the upper femtomolar range (10(-13) M). Digital immunoassay technology has improved detection sensitivity three logs, to the attomolar range (10(-16) M). This capability has the potential to open new advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, but such technologies have been relegated to manual procedures that are not well suited for efficient routine use. We describe a new laboratory instrument that provides full automation of single-molecule array (Simoa) technology for digital immunoassays. The instrument is capable of single-molecule sensitivity and multiplexing with short turnaround times and a throughput of 66 samples/h. Singleplex and multiplexed digital immunoassays were developed for 16 proteins of interest in cardiovascular, cancer, infectious disease, neurology, and inflammation research. The average sensitivity improvement of the Simoa immunoassays versus conventional ELISA was >1200-fold, with coefficients of variation of <10%. The potential of digital immunoassays to advance human diagnostics was illustrated in two clinical areas: traumatic brain injury and early detection of infectious disease. © 2015 Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening.
[33]
Yao, F, Zhang, K, Zhang, Y, et al. Identification of Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Through Computational Prediction and Experimental Validation[J]. Front Neurol, 2018. 9: 1158.
[34]
Cui, J, Liu, Q, Puett, D, et al. Computational prediction of human proteins that can be secreted into the bloodstream[J]. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(20): 2370-2375.
PDF(625 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/