Neuropsychological and neuroimaging characteristics of early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

LIZheyu, LIKaicheng, ZENGQingze, CHENYanxing, ZHANGMinming

Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2019, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 537-543.

PDF(634 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders      Editor in chief: Jun WANG

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(634 KB)
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2019, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 537-543. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2019.04.014

Neuropsychological and neuroimaging characteristics of early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be classified into early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD), depending on the age of disease onset. Thereinto, EOAD shows a rapid progression after onset and thus requires earlier diagnosis. Identification of differences in clinical manifestations, including the imaging features, would be important in early detection of the two subtypes. Although EOAD patients can be confirmed with special symptoms, including visuo-spatial dysfunctions, there still remains other overlaps between EOAD and LOAD which requires an early and accurate diagnosis. This review provides an overview of two subtypes and tries to provide some references for diagnosis, especially for EOAD.

Key words

Alzheimer’s disease / Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease / Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease / Gene factor risk / MRI

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Zheyu , LI Kaicheng , ZENG Qingze , et al . Neuropsychological and neuroimaging characteristics of early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. 2019, 2(4): 537-543 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2019.04.014

References

[1]
Amaducci, LA, Rocca, WA, Schoenberg, BS, et al. Origin of the distinction between Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: how history can clarify nosology[J]. Neurology, 1986, 36(11):1497-1499.
Since the beginning of the century, psychiatrists and neurologists have been arguing about the identity of presenile (Alzheimer's disease) and senile dementia. History reveals that the distinction was originally based on anecdotal clinical observations and that competition among universities was one of the underlying determinants. The personal opinion of Kraepelin played a major role. Given his widespread reputation and authority, he generated a dogma difficult to change. Reports based on large clinicopathologic series have shown that the pathologies of presenile and senile dementia are not qualitatively different. Although the controversy continues, many have come to regard Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia as part of the same spectrum of disease, independent of the age of onset.
[2]
Gour, N, Felician, O, Didic, M, et al. Functional connectivity changes differ in early and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014, 35(7): 2978-2994.
[3]
Bertram, L, Tanzi, RE, The genetics of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 2012, 107:79-100.
[4]
Bruni, AC, Conidi, ME, Bernardi, L, et al. Genetics in degenerative dementia: current status and applicability[J]. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 2014, 28(3):199-205.
[5]
Lane, CA, Hardy, J, Schott, JM,et al Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2018, 25(1):59-70.
Alzheimer's disease, the commonest cause of dementia, is a growing global health concern with huge implications for individuals and society. In this review, current understanding of the epidemiology, genetics, pathology and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is outlined, before its clinical presentation and current treatment strategies are discussed. Finally, the review discusses how our enhanced understanding of Alzheimer pathogenesis, including the recognition of a protracted preclinical phase, is informing new therapeutic strategies with the aim of moving from treatment to prevention.© 2017 EAN.
[6]
Cuyvers, E Sleegers, K, Genetic variations underlying Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from genome-wide association studies and beyond[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2016, 15(8):857-868.
With the advent of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and next-generation sequencing, more than 20 risk loci that affect Alzheimer's disease have been identified. These loci are estimated to explain about 28% of the heritability of liability, 30% of familial risk, and over 50% of sibling recurrence risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. These estimates are high in comparison with those for other complex diseases for which more risk loci have been discovered, such as type 2 diabetes, which is mostly a result of the strong effect of APOE ɛ4 and to a lesser extent the rare variant TREM2 p.Arg47His. The search for functionally relevant genetic variants in risk loci detected in GWAS has revealed that the genetic variations underlying Alzheimer's disease include common variants affecting expression and splicing, a functional intragenic copy number variation, and rare pathogenic variants in risk loci, some of which might lead to familial Alzheimer's disease. An understanding of the contribution of these variants to the development of Alzheimer's disease has several clinical implications, including enhancing diagnostic accuracy and providing targets for the development of novel treatments.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[7]
Jack, CR, Jr, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2018, 14(4):535-562.
[8]
Adriaanse, SM, Binnewijzend, MA, Ossenkoppele, R, et al. Widespread disruption of functional brain organization in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7):e102995.
[9]
Karas, G, Scheltens, P, Rombouts, S, et al. Precuneus atrophy in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease: a morphometric structural MRI study[J]. Neuroradiol, 2007, 49(12):967-976.
[10]
Koedam, EL, Lauffer, V, van der Vlies, AE, et al. Early- versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease: more than age alone[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2010, 19(4):1401-1408.
[11]
Koss, E, Edland, S, Fillenbaum, G, et al. Clinical and neuropsychological differences between patients with earlier and later onset of Alzheimer’s disease: a CERAD analysis, Part XII[J]. Neurol, 1996, 46(1):136-141.
[12]
Stopford, CL, Snowden, JS, Thompson, JC, et al. Variability in cognitive presentation of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Cortex, 2008, 44(2):185-195.
The aim of the present study was to explore the nature and prevalence of phenotypic variations in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neuropsychological profiles of a large cross-sectional cohort of patients with a clinical diagnosis of the disease were examined. All tests distinguished the AD group from controls confirming their sensitivity to the presence of early AD. Factor analysis of test scores revealed five factors, reflecting the discrete cognitive domains of memory, language, perceptuospatial abilities, executive skills, and praxis. Cluster analysis revealed distinct performance profiles that could not be accounted for by disease severity. Some patients showed an accentuation of memory impairment relative to other domains, whereas others showed relative sparing. Cognitive deficits other than memory were the salient presenting feature in a relatively high proportion of patients. A subset of the cohort (22%) showed grossly disproportionate impairments in one cognitive domain. The findings emphasise variability in presentation and indicate that distinct phenotypic variations appear to lie on a continuum rather than representing discrete forms of disease.
[13]
Park, HK, Choi, SH, Park, SA, et al. Cognitive profiles and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Korean early-onset Alzheimer’s disease patients: a CREDOS study[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2015, 44(2):661-673.
[14]
Joshi, A, Ringman, JM, Lee, AS, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics between familial and non-famIlIal early onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Neurol, 2012, 259(10):2182-2188.
[15]
Houlden, H, Baker, M, McGowan, E, et al. Variant Alzheimer’s disease with spastic paraparesis and cotton wool plaques is caused by PS-1 mutations that lead to exceptionally high amyloid-beta concentrations[J]. Ann Neurol, 2000, 48(5):806-808.
We describe 3 new families affected by Alzheimer's disease with spastic paraparesis. In affected individuals, including the earliest known patient with this clinical syndrome, neuropathological examination revealed large "cotton wool" plaques similar to those we have previously described in a Finnish family. In the families in which DNA was available, presenilin-1 mutations were observed. Transfection of cells with these mutant genes caused exceptionally large increases in secreted Abeta42 levels. Furthermore, brain tissue from individuals with this syndrome had very high amyloid-beta concentrations. These findings define the molecular pathogenesis of an important subgroup of Alzheimer's disease and have implications for the pathogenesis of the disease in general.
[16]
Cho, H, Jeon, S, Kang, SJ, et al. Longitudinal changes of cortical thickness in early-versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2013, 34(7):1921. e1929-1921. e1915.
[17]
Yoon, B, Shim, YS, Park, HK, et al. Predictive factors for disease progression in patients with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2016, 49(1): 85-91.
[18]
Ortof, E, Crystal, HA, Rate of progression of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1989, 37(6):511-514.
We determined rate of cognitive decline in 54 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive ability was assessed by score on the Blessed test of orientation, memory, and concentration. Rate of progression was defined as the change in score on the Blessed test per year and was computed using a linear regression analysis. Only patients who had been followed for at least one year and who had at least three separate evaluations were included in the study. The overall rate of progression was 4.1 Blessed points per year. Age of onset, duration of illness, and family history of dementia had no significant influence on rate of progression.
[19]
Joubert, S, Gour, N, Guedj, E, et al. Early-onset and late- onset Alzheimer’s disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment[J]. Cortex, 2016, 74: 217-232.
The goal of this study was to investigate the specific patterns of memory breakdown in patients suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Twenty EOAD patients, twenty LOAD patients, twenty matched younger controls, and twenty matched older controls participated in this study. All participants underwent a detailed neuropsychological assessment, an MRI scan, an FDG-PET scan, and AD patients had biomarkers as supporting evidence of both amyloïdopathy and neuronal injury. Results of the neuropsychological assessment showed that both EOAD and LOAD groups were impaired in the domains of memory, executive functions, language, praxis, and visuoconstructional abilities, when compared to their respective control groups. EOAD and LOAD groups, however, showed distinct patterns of memory impairment. Even though both groups were similarly affected on measures of episodic, short term and working memory, in contrast semantic memory was significantly more impaired in LOAD than in EOAD patients. The EOAD group was not more affected than the LOAD group in any memory domain. EOAD patients, however, showed significantly poorer performance in other cognitive domains including executive functions and visuoconstructional abilities. A more detailed analysis of the pattern of semantic memory performance among patient groups revealed that the LOAD was more profoundly impaired, in tasks of both spontaneous recall and semantic recognition. Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM) analyses showed that impaired semantic performance in patients was associated with reduced gray matter volume in the anterior temporal lobe (ATL) region, while PET-FDG analyses revealed that poorer semantic performance was associated with greater hypometabolism in the left temporoparietal region, both areas reflecting key regions of the semantic network. Results of this study indicate that EOAD and LOAD patients present with distinct patterns of memory impairment, and that a genuine semantic impairment may represent one of the clinical hallmarks of LOAD.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[20]
Panegyres, PK, Chen, HY, Differences between early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Am J Neurodegener Dis, 2013, 2(4):300-306.
[21]
Heinzen, EL, Need, AC, Hayden, KM, et al. Genome- wide scan of copy number variation in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2010, 19(1): 69-77.
Alzheimer's disease is a complex and progressive neurodegenerative disease leading to loss of memory, cognitive impairment, and ultimately death. To date, six large-scale genome-wide association studies have been conducted to identify SNPs that influence disease predisposition. These studies have confirmed the well-known APOE epsilon4 risk allele, identified a novel variant that influences disease risk within the APOE epsilon4 population, found a SNP that modifies the age of disease onset, as well as reported the first sex-linked susceptibility variant. Here we report a genome-wide scan of Alzheimer's disease in a set of 331 cases and 368 controls, extending analyses for the first time to include assessments of copy number variation. In this analysis, no new SNPs show genome-wide significance. We also screened for effects of copy number variation, and while nothing was significant, a duplication in CHRNA7 appears interesting enough to warrant further investigation.
[22]
Lind, J, Larsson, A, Persson, J, et al. Reduced hippocampal volume in non-demented carriers of the apolipoprotein E epsilon4: relation to chronological age and recognition memory[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2006, 396(1): 23-27.
[23]
Crivello, F, Lemaitre, H, Dufouil, C, et al. Effects of ApoE-epsilon4 allele load and age on the rates of grey matter and hippocampal volumes loss in a longitudinal cohort of 1186 healthy elderly persons[J]. Neuroimage, 2010, 53(3):1064-1069.
In a sample of 1186 healthy subjects aged 65 to 89 years who were scanned twice with MRI 3.6 years apart, we studied the effects of age and ApoE-epsilon4 allele load on the rate of atrophy of grey matter and hippocampus. Rates of grey matter and hippocampal volumes loss were computed from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images using voxel-based morphometry and region of interest analysis. Longitudinal analysis showed that an age-related annual rate of grey matter volume loss was only seen in epsilon4 homozygotes only (n=14) whereas no age effect was seen epsilon4 heterozygotes (n=239) and in noncarriers (n=933). ApoE-epsilon4 homozygotes also had a significantly larger rate of hippocampal volume loss than heterozygotes or noncarriers. During the same period, no effect or interaction of ApoE genotype and age was observed on cognitive decline, as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). These data do not suggest an epsilon4 gene dose effect on the rate of hippocampal volume loss in healthy elderly subjects as most of the effect was limited to homozygotes. Hippocampal volume loss may not be a good imaging marker to understand the effect of the ApoE-epsilon4 allele on the risk of dementia in a population-based setting. It could be hypothesized that the impact of a single ApoE-epsilon4 allele on brain structures is largely delayed in time.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[24]
Wijsman, EM, Daw, EW, Yu, X, et al. APOE and other loci affect age-at-onset in Alzheimer’s disease families with PS2 mutation[J]. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 2005, 132B(1):14-20.
[25]
van Duijn, CM, de Knijff, P, Cruts, M, et al. Apolipoprotein E4 allele in a population-based study of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Nat Genet, 1994, 7(1):74-78.
Several studies have reported an association of the apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 (APOE*4) to familial and sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Here we report on the relationship between APOE*4 and early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) in a Dutch population-based study. The frequency of the APOE*4 allele was 2.3 times higher among EOAD cases compared to controls. Among patients, the allele frequency was 1.6 times higher in those with a positive family history than in those without. A significant increase in risk of EOAD was found for subjects homozygous for APOE*4 regardless of family history of dementia, but an increase in EOAD risk for APOE*4 heterozygotes could only be shown in subjects with a positive family history. Our study demonstrates a significant association between APOE*4 and EOAD which is modified by family history of dementia.
[26]
Davidson, Y, Gibbons, L, Pritchard, A, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele frequency and age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2007, 23(1):60-66.
[27]
Wingo, TS, Lah, JJ, Levey, AI, et al. Autosomal recessive causes likely in early-onset Alzheimer disease[J]. Arch Neurol, 2012, 69(1):59-64.
[28]
Mendez, MF, Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease: nonamnestic subtypes and type 2 AD[J]. Arch Med Res, 2012, 43(8):677-685.
Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent neurodegenerative dementia, are usually elderly; however, ∼4-5% develop early-onset AD (EOAD) with onset before age 65. Most EOAD is sporadic, but about 5% of patients with EOAD have an autosomal dominant mutation such as Presenilin 1, Presenilin 2, or alterations in the Amyloid Precursor Protein gene. Although most Alzheimer's research has concentrated on older, late-onset AD (LOAD), there is much recent interest and research in EOAD. These recent studies indicate that EOAD is a heterogeneous disorder with significant differences from LOAD. From 22-64% of EOAD patients have a predominant nonamnestic syndrome presenting with deficits in language, visuospatial abilities, praxis, or other non-memory cognition. These nonamnestic patients may differ in several ways from the usual memory or amnestic patients. Patients with nonamnestic EOAD compared to typical amnestic AD have a more aggressive course, lack the apolipoprotein Eɛ4 (APOE ɛ4) susceptibility gene for AD, and have a focus and early involvement of non-hippocampal areas of brain, particularly parietal neocortex. These differences in the EOAD subtypes indicate differences in the underlying amyloid cascade, the prevailing pathophysiological theory for the development of AD. Together the results of recent studies suggest that nonamnestic subtypes of EOAD constitute a Type 2 AD distinct from the usual, typical disorder. In sum, the study of EOAD can reveal much about the clinical heterogeneity, predisposing factors, and neurobiology of this disease.Copyright © 2012 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[29]
Barber, IS, Garcia-Cardenas, JM, Sakdapanichkul, C, et al. Screening exons 16 and 17 of the amyloid precursor protein gene in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2016, 39:220e221-227.
[30]
Cruts, M, van Duijn, CM, Backhovens, H, et al. Estimation of the genetic contribution of presenilin-1 and-2 mutations in a population-based study of presenile Alzheimer disease[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 1998, 7(1):43-51.
Two closely related genes, the presenilins ( PS ), located at chromosomes 14q24.3 and 1q42.1, have been identified for autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (AD) with onset age below 65 years (presenile AD). We performed a systematic mutation analysis of all coding and 5'-non-coding exons of PS -1 and PS -2 in a population-based epidemiological series of 101 unrelated familial and sporadic presenile AD cases. The familial cases included 10 patients of autosomal dominant AD families sampled for linkage analysis studies. In all patients mutations in the amyloid precursor protein gene ( APP ) had previously been excluded. Four different PS -1 missense mutations were identified in six familial cases, two of which where autosomal dominant cases. Three mutations resulted in onset ages above 55 years, with one segregating in an autosomal dominant family with mean onset age 64 years (range 50-78 years). One PS -2 mutation was identified in a sporadic case with onset age 62 years. Our mutation data provided estimates for PS -1 and PS -2 mutation frequencies in presenile AD of 6 and 1% respectively. When family history was accounted for mutation frequencies for PS -1 were 9% in familial cases and 18% in autosomal dominant cases. Further, polymorphisms were detected in the promoter and the 5'-non-coding region of PS -1 and in intronic and exonic sequences of PS -2 that will be useful in genetic association studies.
[31]
Ryan, NS, Rossor, MN, Correlating familial Alzheimer’s disease gene mutations with clinical phenotype[J]. Biomark Med, 2010, 4(1):99-112.
[32]
Rovelet-Lecrux, A, Hannequin, D, Raux, G, et al. APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy[J]. Nat Genet, 2006, 38(1):24-26.
We report duplication of the APP locus on chromosome 21 in five families with autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease (ADEOAD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Among these families, the duplicated segments had a minimal size ranging from 0.58 to 6.37 Mb. Brains from individuals with APP duplication showed abundant parenchymal and vascular deposits of amyloid-beta peptides. Duplication of the APP locus, resulting in accumulation of amyloid-beta peptides, causes ADEOAD with CAA.
[33]
Pottier, C, Wallon, D, Rousseau, S, et al. TREM2 R47H variant as a risk factor for early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2013, 35(1):45-49.
The rs75932628-T variant of the gene encoding the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) has recently been identified as a rare risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study we examined the association between TREM2 exon 2 variants and early-onset AD in a sample of Caucasian subjects of French origin including 726 patients with age of onset ≤65 years and 783 controls. Only the rs75932628-T variant (predicted to cause an R47H substitution) conferred a significant risk for early-onset AD (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.3 to 16.9; p = 0.009). These results confirm the association between this variant and AD and underline its involvement in early-onset cases.
[34]
Pottier, C, Ravenscroft, TA, Brown, PH, et al. TYROBP genetic variants in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2016, 48:222.e229-222. e215.
[35]
Van Cauwenberghe, C,et al. Van Broeckhoven C, Sleegers K, The genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease: clinical implications and perspectives[J]. Genet Med, 2016, 18(5):421-430.
The search for the genetic factors contributing to Alzheimer disease (AD) has evolved tremendously throughout the years. It started from the discovery of fully penetrant mutations in Amyloid precursor protein, Presenilin 1, and Presenilin 2 as a cause of autosomal dominant AD, the identification of the ɛ4 allele of Apolipoprotein E as a strong genetic risk factor for both early-onset and late-onset AD, and evolved to the more recent detection of at least 21 additional genetic risk loci for the genetically complex form of AD emerging from genome-wide association studies and massive parallel resequencing efforts. These advances in AD genetics are positioned in light of the current endeavor directing toward translational research and personalized treatment of AD. We discuss the current state of the art of AD genetics and address the implications and relevance of AD genetics in clinical diagnosis and risk prediction, distinguishing between monogenic and multifactorial AD. Furthermore, the potential and current limitations of molecular reclassification of AD to streamline clinical trials in drug development and biomarker studies are addressed.Genet Med 18 5, 421-430.
[36]
Rosenthal, SL, Kamboh, MI, Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease genes and the potentially implicated pathways[J]. Curr Genet Med Rep, 2014, 2:85-101.
[37]
Ridge, PG, Ebbert, MT, Kauwe, JS, et al. Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2013, 2013: 254954.
[38]
Karch, CM, Goate, AM, Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2015, 77(1):43-51.
[39]
Frisoni, GB, Pievani, M, Testa, C, et al. The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Brain, 2007, 130(3):720-730.
[40]
Scarmeas, N, Stern, Y, Cognitive reserve: implications for diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2004, 4(5):374-380.
[41]
Lo, RY, Jagust, WJ, Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging I. effect of cognitive reserve markers on Alzheimer pathologic progression[J]. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 2013, 27(4):343-350.
[42]
Migliaccio, R, Agosta, F, Possin, KL, et al. Mapping the progression of atrophy in early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2015, 46(2): 351-364.
The term early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) identifies patients who meet criteria for AD, but show onset of symptoms before the age of 65. We map progression of gray matter atrophy in EOAD patients compared to late-onset AD (LOAD). T1-weighted MRI scans were obtained at diagnosis and one-year follow-up from 15 EOAD, 10 LOAD, and 38 age-matched controls. Voxel-based and tensor-based morphometry were used, respectively, to assess the baseline and progression of atrophy. At baseline, EOAD patients already showed a widespread atrophy in temporal, parietal, occipital, and frontal cortices. After one year, EOAD had atrophy progression in medial temporal and medial parietal cortices. At baseline, LOAD patients showed atrophy in the medial temporal regions only, and, after one year, an extensive pattern of atrophy progression in the same neocortical cortices of EOAD. Although atrophy mainly involved different lateral neocortical or medial temporal hubs at baseline, it eventually progressed along the same brain default-network regions in both groups. The cortical region showing a significant progression in both groups was the medial precuneus/posterior cingulate.
[43]
Canu, E, Frisoni, GB, Agosta, F, et al. Early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease patients have distinct patterns of white matter damage[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2012, 33(6): 1023-1033.
[44]
Daianu, M, Mendez, MF, Baboyan, VG, et al. An advanced white matter tract analysis in frontotemporal dementia and early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2016, 10(4):1038-1053.
[45]
Acosta-Cabronero, J, Williams, GB, Pengas, G, et al. Absolute diffusivities define the landscape of white matter degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Brain, 2010, 133(2):529-539.
[46]
Heun, R, Freymann, K, Erb, M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and actual retrieval performance affect cerebral activation in the elderly[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2007, 28(3):404-413.
[47]
Garrido, GE, Furuie, SS, Buchpiguel, CA, et al. Relation between medial temporal atrophy and functional brain activity during memory processing in Alzheimer’s disease: a combined MRI and SPECT study[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2002, 73(5):508-516.
[48]
Daianu, M, Mezher, A, Mendez, MF, et al. Disrupted rich club network in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2016, 37(3):868-883.
[49]
Kim, EJ, Cho, SS, Jeong, Y, et al. Glucose metabolism in early onset versus late onset Alzheimer’s disease: an SPM analysis of 120 patients[J]. Brain, 2005, 128(8): 1790-1801.
[50]
Chiaravalloti, A, Koch, G, Toniolo, S, et al. Comparison between early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease patients with Amnestic presentation: CSF and (18)F-FDG PET study[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra, 2016, 6(1):108-119.
To investigate the differences in brain glucose consumption between patients with early onset of Alzheimer's disease (EOAD, aged ≤65 years) and patients with late onset of Alzheimer's disease (LOAD, aged >65 years).Differences in brain glucose consumption between the groups have been evaluated by means of Statistical Parametric Mapping version 8, with the use of age, sex, Mini-Mental State Examination and cerebrospinal fluid values of AΒ1-42, phosphorylated Tau and total Tau as covariates in the comparison between EOAD and LOAD.As compared to LOAD, EOAD patients showed a significant decrease in glucose consumption in a wide portion of the left parietal lobe (BA7, BA31 and BA40). No significant differences were obtained when subtracting the EOAD from the LOAD group.The results of our study show that patients with EOAD show a different metabolic pattern as compared to those with LOAD that mainly involves the left parietal lobe.
[51]
Shiino, A, Watanabe, T, Kitagawa, T, et al. Different atrophic patterns in early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and evaluation of clinical utility of a method of regional z-score analysis using voxel-based morphometry[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2008, 26 (2):175-186.
[52]
Kemp, PM, Holmes, C, Hoffmann, SM, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: differences in technetium-99m HMPAO SPECT scan findings between early onset and late onset dementia[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2003, 74(6):715-719.
[53]
Chung, J, Yoo, K, Kim, E, et al. Glucose metabolic brain networks in early-onset vs. late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2016, 8:159.
[54]
Ballarini, T, Iaccarino, L, Magnani, G, et al. Neuropsychiatric subsyndromes and brain metabolic network dysfunctions in early onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2016, 37(12):4234-4247.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) often occur in early-age-of-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and cluster into sub-syndromes (SSy). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between F-FDG-PET regional and connectivity-based brain metabolic dysfunctions and neuropsychiatric SSy. NPSs were assessed in 27 EOAD using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory and further clustered into four SSy (apathetic, hyperactivity, affective, and psychotic SSy). Eighty-five percent of EOAD showed at least one NPS. Voxel-wise correlations between SSy scores and brain glucose metabolism (assessed with F-FDG positron emission tomography) were studied. Interregional correlation analysis was used to explore metabolic connectivity in the salience (aSN) and default mode networks (DMN) in a larger sample of EOAD (N = 51) and Healthy Controls (N = 57). The apathetic, hyperactivity, and affective SSy were highly prevalent (>60%) as compared to the psychotic SSy (33%). The hyperactivity SSy scores were associated with increase of glucose metabolism in frontal and limbic structures, implicated in behavioral control. A comparable positive correlation with part of the same network was found for the affective SSy scores. On the other hand, the apathetic SSy scores were negatively correlated with metabolism in the bilateral orbitofrontal and dorsolateral frontal cortex known to be involved in motivation and decision-making processes. Consistent with these SSy regional correlations with brain metabolic dysfunction, the connectivity analysis showed increases in the aSN and decreases in the DMN. Behavioral abnormalities in EOAD are associated with specific dysfunctional changes in brain metabolic activity, in particular in the aSN that seems to play a crucial role in NPSs in EOAD. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4234-4247, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
[55]
Verclytte, S, Lopes, R, Lenfant, P, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion and hypometabolism detected by arterial spin labeling MRI and FDG-PET in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Neuroimaging, 2016, 26(2):207-212.
[56]
van Rooden, S, Versluis, MJ, Liem, MK, et al. Cortical phase changes in Alzheimer’s disease at 7T MRI: a novel imaging marker[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2014, 10 (1):e19-e26.
[57]
van Rooden, S, Doan, NT, Versluis, MJ, et al. 7T T(2)*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reveals cortical phase differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2015, 36(1):20-26.
[58]
Marshall, GA, Fairbanks, LA, Tekin, S, et al. Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease is associated with greater pathologic burden[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2007, 20(1):29-33.
[59]
Ho, GJ, Hansen, LA, Alford, MF, et al. Age at onset is associated with disease severity in Lewy body variant and Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neuroreport, 2002, 13(14):1825-1828.
[60]
Ossenkoppele, R, Zwan, MD, Tolboom, N, et al. Amyloid burden and metabolic function in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease: parietal lobe involvement[J]. Brain, 2012, 135(7):2115-2125.
[61]
Cho, H, Seo, SW, Kim, JH, et al. Amyloid deposition in early onset versus late onset Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2013, 35(4):813-821.
[62]
Rabinovici, GD, Furst, AJ, Alkalay, A, et al. Increased metabolic vulnerability in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease is not related to amyloid burden[J]. Brain, 2010, 133(2):512-528.
[63]
Lehmann, M, Ghosh, PM, Madison, C, et al. Diverging patterns of amyloid deposition and hypometabolism in clinical variants of probable Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Brain, 2013, 136(3):844-858.
PDF(634 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/