
To analyse factors affecting decline in level of activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s disease
XIAOTianyi, WANGHongquan, LIYanfeng
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2020, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 37-41.
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
Editor in chief: Jun WANG
To analyse factors affecting decline in level of activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s disease
Objective: To analyze the factors influencing the decline of Ability of daily life in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Methods: Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease were followed up for 16 weeks. MMSE, MoCA, ADCS-ADL and ADAS-cog were assessed at the beginning and after 16 weeks. Results: In the group without anti dementia drugs, MMSE score, MoCA score, ADCS-ADL score and ADAS-cog score were 20.50±3.53, 18.67±7.01, 17.50±11.73 and 45.17±4.28, respectively. After 16 weeks of observation, they were 18.25±6.23, 17.92±6.96, 18.67±12.23 and 43.67±7.72, respectively, all with deterioration trend, but there was no statistical significance before and after the observation; in the group treated with single anti dementia drug, the MMSE score, MoCA score, ADCS-ADL score and ADAS-cog score were 19.50±4.50, 17.30±5.47, 16.13±9.24 and 46.50±5.59, respectively, and they were 22.73±4.88, 17.83±6.34, 14.50±8.20 and 48.58±5.63 after 16 weeks of observation. There were significant differences in MMSE score, ADAS-cog score and ADCS-ADL score; The MMSE score, MoCA score, ADCS-ADL score and ADAS-cog score were 18.75±2.63, 18.58±5.02, 19.08±18.00 and 42.58±6.59 respectively in the combination group, and they were 24.83±6.22, 19.67±4.10, 16.42±15.54 and 48.00±5.83 respectively after 16 weeks of observation, the score was improved and the difference was statistically significant. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that education level, basic ADCS-ADL score, anti dementia treatment plan and care had influence on ADCS-ADL score (P<0.05). Conclusion: Early combination of anti dementia drugs and intensive care can improve the ability of daily life of AD patients, and education also plays a positive role.
[1] |
彭丹涛, 侯青云, 解恒革, 等. 安理申治疗轻中度阿尔茨海默病有效性及安全性的临床研究[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2002, 35(1): 22-24.
|
[2] |
胡洪涛, 张振馨, 姚景莉, 等. 盐酸美金刚治疗阿尔茨海默病多中心随机对照临床试验[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2006, 45(4): 277-280.
|
[3] |
何饶丽, 潘晓东, 黄天文, 等. 美金刚治疗中重度阿尔茨海默病疗效的系统评价[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2015, 34(6): 680-684.
|
[4] |
马学森, 李凌, 曾珍, 等. 多奈哌齐对阿尔茨海默病并精神异常患者认知功能及日常生活自理能力的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(19): 5579-5580.
|
[5] |
Currently, five pharmacotherapeutic options are available to treat Alzheimer's disease: memantine; the three cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine; and combination treatments with memantine and one cholinesterase inhibitor. Selection of the best course of treatment is based upon the evidence gathered by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Areas covered: This article provides a risk-benefit analysis of these treatments using evidence from meta-analyses on their safety and their efficacy. Expert opinion: Memantine improves cognitive functions and behavioral disturbances more efficiently than the placebo, both as monotherapy and in combination with donepezil. Although memantine monotherapy and combination therapy are associated with a few individual adverse events such as somnolence, it is well-tolerated and its safety (all-cause discontinuation) is comparable or superior to that of the placebo (agitation). Pooled cholinesterase inhibitors are superior to the placebo in the improvement of cognitive functions, but not behavioral disturbances and they are not well-tolerated, as evaluated by the high discontinuation rate. Donepezil (10 mg/day) and oral rivastigmine and galantamine monotherapies carry the risk for some adverse events including gastrointestinal symptoms. Therefore, we consider that combined treatment with memantine and donepezil is the most useful treatment for Alzheimer's disease.
|
[6] |
徐英, 陈军妹, 陈梅, 等. 特殊环境对轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者日常生活活动能力、认知功能、抑郁状态的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2017, 32(5): 564-566.
|
[7] |
The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia.Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
Environmental influences on the rate of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression have received little attention. Our objective was to test hypotheses concerning associations between caregiver personality traits and the rate of AD progression.Care receivers (CR) were 161 persons with AD from a population-based dementia progression study; 55 of their caregivers were spouses and 106 were adult children. Cognitive status of the CR was measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination every six months, over an average of 5.6 (range: 1-14) years. Linear mixed models tested rate of cognitive decline as a function of caregiver personality traits from the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.Significantly faster cognitive decline was observed with higher caregiver Neuroticism overall; however, in stratified models, effects were significant for adult child but not spouse caregivers. Neuroticism facets of depression, anxiety, and vulnerability to stress were significantly associated with faster decline. Higher caregiver Extraversion was associated with slower decline in the CR when caregivers were adult children but not spouses.For adult child caregivers, caregiver personality traits are associated with rate of cognitive decline in CRs with AD regardless of co-residency. Results suggest that dementia caregiver interventions promoting positive care management strategies and ways to react to caregiving challenges may eventually become an important complement to pharmacologic and other approaches aimed at slower rate of decline in dementia.
|
[12] |
廖峥娈, 陈嫣, 谭云飞, 等. 不同照料方式下散发型阿尔茨海默病首诊患者病情比较[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(7): 532-536.
|
[13] |
申远, 李春渡, 吴文源, 等. 认知老化、老年大脑可塑性与认知储备[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2009, 18(8): 765-766.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |