
A meta-analysis of the effects of non-pharmacological intervention on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease patients
Yuke SHI, Xiajing LOU, Bingsheng WANG, Bin WANG, Haiyan JIANG, Junling KANG, Shihua CAO
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 98-103.
Abbreviation (ISO4): Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
Editor in chief: Jun WANG
A meta-analysis of the effects of non-pharmacological intervention on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease patients
Objective: To evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological intervention in AD patients. Methods: Relevant Chinese and English databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of non-drug intervention effect in Alzheimer's disease patients and conduct statistical treatment using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: In 7 articles, non-pharmacological intervention improved the Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE) score of Alzheimer's patients (WMD=-1.91,95%CI:-3.10,-0.70,Z=3.13,P=0.002) and Activity of Daily Living Scale(ADL) score (WMD=-0.09,95%CI:-0.86,0.67,Z=0.24,P=0.81). Conclusion: Compared with drug intervention or control measures, non-drug intervention can improve the intelligence and daily living function of Alzheimer's disease patients to a certain extent, but more long-term clinical data with large sample size are still needed for further verification.
Alzheimer's disease / Non-drug therapy / Drug therapy / Randomized controlled trial
[1] |
丁琳, 陈素虹, 林恺, 等. 巴氏指数在老年痴呆患者中的心理测量学特征及其与患者精神行为症状照护困扰程度的相关性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(24): 6106-6108.
|
[2] |
潘哲拓, 郑旭杰, 邵学克, 等. 浙江地区60-85岁人群阿尔茨海默病流行病学特征分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2022, 29(12):1525-1528.
|
[3] |
World Health Organization. Dementia[EB/OL]. [2024-05-02]. https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia/.
|
[4] |
World Health Organization. Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia:WHO guidelines[EB/OL]. [2024-05-02]. https://dementiapartnerships.com/resource/risk-reduction-of-cognitive-decline-and-dementia/.
|
[5] |
刘敏, 孙关, 孙雯敏, 等. 预立医疗照护计划在老年痴呆病人中的应用研究进展[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(16):2185-2190.
|
[6] |
叶盛, 陈利群. 阿尔茨海默病相关睡眠障碍的非药物干预研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(22):2707-2710.
|
[7] |
袁小楠, 秦心睿, 闻崇兵, 等. 日光疗法对老年痴呆患者激越行为影响的meta分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2023, 30(2):144-147.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
张露露, 王娅平, 王凤玲, 等. 蒙台梭利法:一种新型老年痴呆症非药物疗法[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2021, 24(6):850-854.
|
[11] |
梁兵, 袁芳. 国际新近阿尔茨海默病痴呆诊断标准解读[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2017, 42(6):682-683.
|
[12] |
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™, 5th ed.[EB/OL]. [2024-05-06]. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-14907-000.
|
[13] |
中华医学会精神病学分会. 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(精神障碍分类)[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2001(3):59-63.
|
[14] |
张珣. 经颈动脉彩超联合MoCA认知评估量表在老年痴呆患者临床检测中的意义研究[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2022, 28(13):81-83.
|
[15] |
潘达, 德顾玉, 东侍德, 等. 中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2000(3):4-9.
|
[16] |
田金洲, 韩明向, 涂晋文, 等. 血管性痴呆的诊断、辨证及疗效判定标准[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2000(5):16-24.
|
[17] |
王康锋, 张立娟, 陈新勇, 等. 电针大椎及百会穴治疗老年性痴呆36例临床观察[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2015, 30(3):784-786.
|
[18] |
贲定严, 刘琼, 陈玉香, 等. 电针足三里和丰隆穴治疗老年性痴呆的疗效观察(英文)[J]. Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science, 2016, 14(6):386-390.
|
[19] |
马慧慧. 基于肾脑相关理论的温针灸治疗轻中度阿尔茨海默病临床研究[D]. 晋中: 山西中医药大学, 2021.
|
[20] |
娄艳芳. 非药物疗法干预阿尔茨海默病的临床疗效研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2015.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
武小莉. 采用盐酸多奈哌齐治疗老年痴呆的有效性分析与研究[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(1): 78.
|
[25] |
农青芳, 陈国英, 谢兴, 等. 老年痴呆非药物治疗研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(20): 3669-3673.
|
[26] |
刘春霞, 尼俊丹, 王嘉慧, 等. 非药物护理干预对阿尔茨海默症患者的效果[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2022, 49(6):1110-1113.
|
[27] |
邓小岚, 蒋园园. 积极心理干预和家庭系统治疗在老年痴呆症患者护理中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2016, 22(27):3906-3909.
|
[28] |
Various authors have evaluated disease progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD), using patient data from individual clinical studies or pooled data across various trials. We conducted a systematic review of public data sources from 1990 to 2008 for all available AChE inhibitor studies, as well as clinical studies that evaluated the rate of deterioration in AD patients. Unique to this analysis, we developed a model based on literature data to describe the longitudinal response in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-cog) (change from baseline) in mild to moderate severity AD patients. The model was used to estimate disease progression for both placebo-treated patients and acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-inhibitor treated patients, and factors that affected disease progression.We collected 576 mean ADAS-cog changes from baseline data points of 52 trials, representing data from approximately 19,972 patients and more than 84,000 individual observations. The model described the rate of disease progression, the evident placebo effect, and the symptomatic effect of AChE-inhibitors. Baseline ADAS-cog, Mini-Mental State Examination score, age, and year of publication were tested as covariates.The disease progression in mild to moderate AD patients across all available and relevant literature sources was estimated as 5.5 points per year. An Emax-type model best described the symptomatic drug effect of AChE inhibitors. The rate of disease progression (underlying disease progression) was no different between placebo and AChE-inhibitors groups. Baseline ADAS-cog is a significant covariate in disease progression. Baseline age was also tested as a covariate in the rate of disease progression, but the model was unable to describe any effects of age, likely because of the narrow distribution of mean age (literature-level analysis). There was no significant impact of publication year in the model.Baseline ADAS-cog is a significant covariate affecting the rate of disease progression, and it describes or at least explains the different rates of deterioration evident in early or late stages of the disease. There was no significant impact of publication year in the model, suggesting that disease progression has not slowed in more recent trials.2010 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |