Alzheimer's disease: Research advances in blood biomarkers and detection technologiese

Shuangshuang LI, Lin HUANG, Qihao GUO

Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 75-82.

PDF(1284 KB)
Home Journals Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders

Abbreviation (ISO4): Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders      Editor in chief: Jun WANG

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1284 KB)
Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 75-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2026.02.001
Commentary

Alzheimer's disease: Research advances in blood biomarkers and detection technologiese

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder, by the time clinical symptoms manifest, irreversible pathological changes have already occurred in the brain; therefore, early diagnosis and intervention are critical to improving patient prognosis. With the advantages of being minimally invasive, convenient, and low-cost, blood-based testing has overcome the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods and has become a research hotspot in the early diagnosis of AD. Based on key domestic and international research findings in recent years, this paper systematically reviews the types, mechanisms of action, and relevant detection technologies of blood biomarkers for AD. The main biomarkers include core pathological markers (Aβ-related markers, phosphorylated tau protein), nerve injury markers (NfL, GFAP), and genetic risk markers (APOE ε4). Detection technologies cover fully automated immune detection platforms, high-sensitivity single-molecule array technology, and high-throughput detection techniques. As systematically reviewed, blood biomarkers and their detection technologies exhibit important clinical significance and application prospects in the early screening, accurate diagnosis, disease progression evaluation, and new drug development of Alzheimer's disease.

Key words

Alzheimer's disease / Blood biomarkers / Detection technologies / Early diagnosis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Shuangshuang LI , Lin HUANG , Qihao GUO. Alzheimer's disease: Research advances in blood biomarkers and detection technologiese[J]. Chinese Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. 2026, 9(2): 75-82 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-5516.2026.02.001

References

[1]
Alzheimer's Association. 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures[J]. Alzheimer's Dement, 2023, 19(4): e12812.
[2]
Jack C R Jr, Knopman D S, Jagust W J, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: An updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(2): 207-216.
In 2010, we put forward a hypothetical model of the major biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The model was received with interest because we described the temporal evolution of AD biomarkers in relation to each other and to the onset and progression of clinical symptoms. Since then, evidence has accumulated that supports the major assumptions of this model. Evidence has also appeared that challenges some of our assumptions, which has allowed us to modify our original model. Refinements to our model include indexing of individuals by time rather than clinical symptom severity; incorporation of interindividual variability in cognitive impairment associated with progression of AD pathophysiology; modifications of the specific temporal ordering of some biomarkers; and recognition that the two major proteinopathies underlying AD biomarker changes, amyloid β (Aβ) and tau, might be initiated independently in sporadic AD, in which we hypothesise that an incident Aβ pathophysiology can accelerate antecedent limbic and brainstem tauopathy.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[3]
Bateman R J, Xiong C. Biomarkers for the preclinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2011, 1(1): a006270.
[4]
Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, et al. CSF biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2010, 6(3): 131-144.
Intense multidisciplinary research has provided detailed knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). This knowledge has been translated into new therapeutic strategies with putative disease-modifying effects. Several of the most promising approaches, such as amyloid-beta immunotherapy and secretase inhibition, are now being tested in clinical trials. Disease-modifying treatments might be at their most effective when initiated very early in the course of AD, before amyloid plaques and neurodegeneration become too widespread. Thus, biomarkers are needed that can detect AD in the predementia phase or, ideally, in presymptomatic individuals. In this Review, we present the rationales behind and the diagnostic performances of the core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for AD, namely total tau, phosphorylated tau and the 42 amino acid form of amyloid-beta. These biomarkers reflect AD pathology, and are candidate markers for predicting future cognitive decline in healthy individuals and the progression to dementia in patients who are cognitively impaired. We also discuss emerging plasma and CSF biomarkers, and explore new proteomics-based strategies for identifying additional CSF markers. Furthermore, we outline the roles of CSF biomarkers in drug discovery and clinical trials, and provide perspectives on AD biomarker discovery and the validation of such markers for use in the clinic.
[5]
Nordberg A. PET in Alzheimer's disease: From pathophysiology to diagnosis and therapy monitoring[J]. J Nucl Med, 2014, 55(1): 14-21.
[6]
Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease:Current status and future perspectives[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2016, 12(11): 634-647.
[7]
Hardy J, Higgins G A. Alzheimer's disease: The amyloid hypothesis[J]. Science, 1992, 256(5054): 184-185.
[8]
Selkoe D J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years[J]. EMBO Mol Med, 2011, 3(7): 483-494.
[9]
Shirey J K, Benzinger T L S, Morris J C, et al. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio as a biomarker for brain amyloidosis in cognitively unimpaired older adults[J]. Neurology, 2016, 87(19): 1974-1982.
[10]
Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Quiroz Y T, et al. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio predicts brain amyloidosis in cognitively unimpaired individuals[J]. Nat Med, 2017, 23(4): 488-493.
[11]
Goedert M, Spillantini M G. Tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(11): 954-966.
[12]
Karikari T K, Fagan A M, Xiong C, et al. Blood phosphorylated tau 217 correlates with tau pathology, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26(11): 1737-1743.
[13]
Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, Hansson O, et al. Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from other tauopathies[J]. Nat Med, 2021, 27(5): 877-884.
[14]
Hibar D P, Jahanshad N, Chhatwal J P, et al. Plasma p-tau217 is a sensitive and specific biomarker for Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2021, 24(10): 1437-1446.
[15]
Dakterzada A, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, et al. Plasma p-tau217 correlates with CSF and PET biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2022, 18(3): e12345.
[16]
Mattsson N, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, et al. Plasma phosphorylated tau 181 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(17): 1650-1658.
[17]
Suárez-Calvet M, Llado A, Molinuevo J L. Total tau and phosphorylated tau as blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 1091.
[18]
Horie K, Salvadó G, Koppisetti R K, et al. Plasma MTBR-tau243 biomarker identifies tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Med, 2025, 31:2044-2053.
[19]
Horie K, Salvadó G, Barthélemy N R, et al. CSF MTBR-tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29:1954-1963.
Aggregated insoluble tau is one of two defining features of Alzheimer's disease. Because clinical symptoms are strongly correlated with tau aggregates, drug development and clinical diagnosis need cost-effective and accessible specific fluid biomarkers of tau aggregates; however, recent studies suggest that the fluid biomarkers currently available cannot specifically track tau aggregates. We show that the microtubule-binding region (MTBR) of tau containing the residue 243 (MTBR-tau243) is a new cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker specific for insoluble tau aggregates and compared it to multiple other phosphorylated tau measures (p-tau181, p-tau205, p-tau217 and p-tau231) in two independent cohorts (BioFINDER-2, n = 448; and Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, n = 219). MTBR-tau243 was most strongly associated with tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognition, whereas showing the lowest association with amyloid-PET. In combination with p-tau205, MTBR-tau243 explained most of the total variance in tau-PET burden (0.58 ≤ R ≤ 0.75) and the performance in predicting cognitive measures (0.34 ≤ R ≤ 0.48) approached that of tau-PET (0.44 ≤ R ≤ 0.52). MTBR-tau243 levels longitudinally increased with insoluble tau aggregates, unlike CSF p-tau species. CSF MTBR-tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau aggregate pathology, which may be utilized in interventional trials and in the diagnosis of patients. Based on these findings, we propose to revise the A/T/(N) criteria to include MTBR-tau243 as representing insoluble tau aggregates ('T').© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
[20]
Gaetani L, Benussi L, Galimberti D, et al. Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2019, 90(10): 1114-1120.
[21]
Kuhle J, Otto M, Bacioglu M, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain in neurodegenerative diseases[J]. Ann Neurol, 2016, 80(2): 237-249.
[22]
Tu X, Wang Y, Zhang L, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2022, 88(4): 1679-1690.
[23]
Heneka M T, Kummer M P, Stutz A, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2015, 14(3): 388-405.
[24]
Mawuenyega K G, Sigurdson W, Ovod V, et al. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: A targeted proteomics approach[J]. Nat Med, 2010, 16(12): 1364-1368.
[25]
Decarli C, Rajan K B, Benzinger T L S, et al. Plasma GFAP as a biomarker of astrocytic activation in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Neurology, 2020, 95(15): e2110-e2120.
[26]
Shi Y, Holtzman D M. Interplay between innate immunity and Alzheimer disease: APOE and TREM2 in the spotlight. Nature reviews[J]. Immunology, 2018, 18(12):759-772.
[27]
Fitzpatrick A W, Falasca M, Kuo D, et al. Tau filaments are tethered within brain extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2024, 27(12): 1890-1901.
[28]
Webster S J, Boyle K E, Town T, et al. Up-regulated production and activation of the complement system in Alzheimer’s disease brain[J]. Am J Pathol, 1999, 154(3): 927-936.
[29]
Chun H J, Kim S H, Kim H J, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein attenuates amyloid beta-induced neurotoxicity by direct interaction[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 4567.
Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) show pronounced heterogeneity across and within vascular beds, with direct implications for their function in injury response and atherosclerosis. Here we combine single-cell transcriptomics with lineage tracing to examine VSMC heterogeneity in healthy mouse vessels. The transcriptional profiles of single VSMCs consistently reflect their region-specific developmental history and show heterogeneous expression of vascular disease-associated genes involved in inflammation, adhesion and migration. We detect a rare population of VSMC-lineage cells that express the multipotent progenitor marker Sca1, progressively downregulate contractile VSMC genes and upregulate genes associated with VSMC response to inflammation and growth factors. We find that Sca1 upregulation is a hallmark of VSMCs undergoing phenotypic switching in vitro and in vivo, and reveal an equivalent population of Sca1-positive VSMC-lineage cells in atherosclerotic plaques. Together, our analyses identify disease-relevant transcriptional signatures in VSMC-lineage cells in healthy blood vessels, with implications for disease susceptibility, diagnosis and prevention.
[30]
Fracassa A, Ferrari G, Balli M V, et al. Stimuli-responsive luminophore drives mechanism switch for highly efficient electrochemiluminescence immunosensing[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2025, 147(39):35501-35509.
[31]
Doecke J D, Chenna A, Lo M, et al. Combining lumipulse p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 as confirmatory tests for Aβ positivity prior to disease-modifying therapy[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2025, 21(9):e70707.
[32]
Rissin D M, Kan C W, Campbell T G, et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2010, 28(6):595-599.
The ability to detect single protein molecules in blood could accelerate the discovery and use of more sensitive diagnostic biomarkers. To detect low-abundance proteins in blood, we captured them on microscopic beads decorated with specific antibodies and then labeled the immunocomplexes (one or zero labeled target protein molecules per bead) with an enzymatic reporter capable of generating a fluorescent product. After isolating the beads in 50-fl reaction chambers designed to hold only a single bead, we used fluorescence imaging to detect single protein molecules. Our single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (digital ELISA) approach detected as few as approximately 10-20 enzyme-labeled complexes in 100 microl of sample (approximately 10(-19) M) and routinely allowed detection of clinically relevant proteins in serum at concentrations (<10(-15) M) much lower than conventional ELISA. Digital ELISA detected prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in sera from patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy at concentrations as low as 14 fg/ml (0.4 fM).
[33]
Oeckl P, Otto M. A review on ms-based blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease[J]. Neurol Ther, 2019, 8(Suppl 2):113-127.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia and there is no cure to date. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are already included in the diagnostic work-up of symptomatic patients but markers for preclinical diagnosis and disease progression are not available. Furthermore, blood biomarkers are highly appreciated because they are minimally invasive and more accessible in primary care and in clinical studies. Mass spectrometry (MS) is an established tool for the measurement of various analytes in biological fluids such as blood. Its major strength is the high selectivity which is why it is also preferred as a reference method for immunoassays. MS has been used in several studies in the past for blood biomarker discovery and validation in AD using targeted MS such as multiple/selected reaction monitoring (MRM/SRM) or unbiased approaches (proteomics, metabolomics). In this short review, we give an overview on the status of current MS-based biomarker candidates for AD in blood plasma and serum.Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available for this article.
[34]
Teunissen C E. Large-scale plasma proteomic profiling identifies a high-performance biomarker panel for Alzheimer's disease screening and staging[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(10):e062860.
[35]
Kuchenbecker L A. Nomination of a novel plasma protein biomarker panel capable of classifying Alzheimer’s disease dementia with high accuracy in an African American cohort[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2025, 17(1):103.
Depression serves as a prodromal symptom of dementia, and individuals with depression exhibit a significantly higher risk of developing dementia. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a novel dementia risk prediction tool among middle-aged and elderly individuals with depression based on machine learning algorithms.\n
[36]
Hibar D P, Bauer A, Rabe C, et al. Elecsys pTau217 plasma immunoassay detection of amyloid pathology in clinical cohorts[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2026, 22(1):e71009.
[37]
Ashton N J, Brum W S, Di Molfetta G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a plasma phosphorylated tau 217 immunoassay for Alzheimer's disease pathology[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2024, 81(3):255-263.
Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) is a specific blood biomarker for Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology, with p-tau217 considered to have the most utility. However, availability of p-tau217 tests for research and clinical use has been limited. Expanding access to this highly accurate AD biomarker is crucial for wider evaluation and implementation of AD blood tests.
[38]
Dyer A H, Dolphin H, O'Connor A, et al. Performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of amyloid-β positivity in a memory clinic cohort using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2024, 16(1):186.
Plasma p-tau217 has emerged as the most promising blood-based marker (BBM) for the detection of Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology, yet few studies have evaluated plasma p-tau217 performance in memory clinic settings. We examined the performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of AD using a high-sensitivity immunoassay in individuals undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP).Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analysed from the TIMC-BRAiN cohort. Amyloid (Aβ) and Tau (T) pathology were classified based on established cut-offs for CSF Aβ and CSF p-tau181 respectively. High-sensitivity electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassays were performed on paired plasma/CSF samples for p-tau217, p-tau181, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neurofilament Light (NfL) and total tau (t-tau). Biomarker performance was evaluated using Receiver-Operating Curve (ROC) and Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) analysis.Of 108 participants (age: 69 ± 6.5 years; 54.6% female) with paired samples obtained at time of LP, 64.8% (n = 70/108) had Aβ pathology detected (35 with Mild Cognitive Impairment and 35 with mild dementia). Plasma p-tau217 was over three-fold higher in Aβ + (12.4 pg/mL; 7.3-19.2 pg/mL) vs. Aβ- participants (3.7 pg/mL; 2.8-4.1 pg/mL; Mann-Whitney U = 230, p < 0.001). Plasma p-tau217 exhibited excellent performance for the detection of Aβ pathology (AUC: 0.91; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.86-0.97)-greater than for T pathology (AUC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.90; z = 1.75, p = 0.04). Plasma p-tau217 outperformed plasma p-tau181 for the detection of Aβ pathology (z = 3.24, p < 0.001). Of the other BBMs, only plasma GFAP significantly differed by Aβ status which significantly correlated with plasma p-tau217 in Aβ + (but not in Aβ-) individuals. Application of a two-point threshold at 95% and 97.5% sensitivities & specificities may have enabled avoidance of LP in 58-68% of cases.Plasma p-tau217 measured using a high-sensitivity ECL immunoassay demonstrated excellent performance for detection of Aβ pathology in a real-world memory clinic cohort. Moving forward, clinical use of plasma p-tau217 to detect AD pathology may substantially reduce need for confirmatory diagnostic testing for AD pathology with diagnostic LP in specialist memory services.© 2024. The Author(s).
[39]
Titeca J, Scarioni M, Oyaert M, et al. Automated high-throughput quantification of plasma p-tau217 and APOE-ε4 for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and cognitive decline in a memory cohort[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2026.
[40]
Wang Y, Cui L, Pan F F, et al. Validation of the robustness of blood-based biomarkers for predicting amyloid-β positivity in Chinese populations[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2025, 17:1660755.
Blood-based biomarkers (BBBs) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) provide a promising, minimally invasive alternative for detecting cerebral amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. However, a lack of robust validation across diverse platforms and populations has hindered their broader clinical adoption.
[41]
Pan F F, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. Plasma P-tau217, GFAP, and NfL as biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Role in disease stratification, pathological progression, and cognitive decline[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2025, 21(12):e70987.
[42]
Tu Y Y, Cui L, Zhang Z, et al. Subjective sleep characteristics in non-demented adults: Domain-specific associations with multimodal Alzheimer's disease biomarkers[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2025, 21(11):e70932.
[43]
Huang L, Xie F, Huang C C, et al. Associations of plasma GFAP and P-tau217 with imaging ATN markers and cognitive decline across Centiloid scales[J]. Lancet Regi Health West Pac, 2026, 68: 101817.
[44]
Dakterzada F, Cipriani R, López-Ortega R, et al. Assessment of the correlation and diagnostic accuracy between cerebrospinal fluid and plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: A comparison of the lumipulse and simoa platforms[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(9):4594.
We compared the clinical and analytical performance of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) plasma biomarkers measured using the single-molecule array (Simoa) and Lumipulse platforms. We quantified the plasma levels of amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (Ptau181), and total tau biomarkers in 81 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 30 with AD, and 16 with non-AD dementia. We found a strong correlation between the Simoa and Lumipulse methods. Concerning the clinical diagnosis, Simoa Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.739, 95% CI 0.592–0.887) and Lumipulse Aβ42 and Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.589–0.882 and AUC 0.733, 95% CI 0.567–0.900) had the highest discriminating power. However, their power was significantly lower than that of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by Lumipulse (AUC 0.879, 95% CI 0.766–0.992). Simoa Ptau181 and Lumipulse Ptau181/Aβ42 were the markers most consistent with the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.712–0.890 vs. AUC 0.870, 95% CI 0.806–0.934, respectively) at the ≥2.127 and ≥0.084 cut-offs, respectively. The performance of the Simoa and Lumipulse plasma AD assays is weaker than that of CSF AD biomarkers. At present, the analysed AD plasma biomarkers may be useful for screening to reduce the number of lumbar punctures in the clinical setting.
[45]
Arranz J, Zhu N, Rubio-Guerra S, et al. Diagnostic performance of plasma pTau217, pTau181, Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 in the LUMIPULSE automated platform for the detection of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2024, 16(1):139.
Recently developed blood markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) detection have high accuracy but usually require ultra-sensitive analytic tools not commonly available in clinical laboratories, and their performance in clinical practice is unknown.
[46]
Algeciras-Schimnich A, Theobald J P, Figdore D J, et al. False positive plasma p-tau217 results associated with heterophilic antibody interference: A potential clinical pitfall[J]. Alzheimer's Dement, 2025, 21(12):e71045.
[47]
Petersen R C, Jack C R Jr, Wiste H J, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2014, 10(3): 372-384.
The “amyloid hypothesis” has dominated Alzheimer research for more than 20 years, and proposes that amyloid is the toxic cause of neural/synaptic damage and dementia. If correct, decreasing the formation or removing amyloid should be therapeutic. Despite discrepancies in the proposed mechanism, and failed clinical trials, amyloid continues to be considered the cause of a degenerative cascade. Alternative hypotheses must explain three features: (i) why amyloid toxicity is not the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), (ii) what alternative mechanisms cause the degeneration and dementia of AD, and (iii) why increased amyloid accumulates in the brain in AD. We propose that AD, which occurs in elderly, already vulnerable brains, with multiple age‐related changes, is precipitated by impaired microvascular function, resulting primarily from decreased Notch‐related angiogenesis. With impaired microvasculature, a lack of vascular endothelial‐derived trophic factors and decreased cerebral blood flow cause the atrophy of neural structures. Therapeutic strategies should focus on supporting normal angiogenesis.
[48]
Barnes D E, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer's disease prevalence[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2011, 10(9): 819-828.
At present, about 33·9 million people worldwide have Alzheimer's disease (AD), and prevalence is expected to triple over the next 40 years. The aim of this Review was to summarise the evidence regarding seven potentially modifiable risk factors for AD: diabetes, midlife hypertension, midlife obesity, smoking, depression, cognitive inactivity or low educational attainment, and physical inactivity. Additionally, we projected the effect of risk factor reduction on AD prevalence by calculating population attributable risks (the percent of cases attributable to a given factor) and the number of AD cases that might be prevented by risk factor reductions of 10% and 25% worldwide and in the USA. Together, up to half of AD cases worldwide (17·2 million) and in the USA (2·9 million) are potentially attributable to these factors. A 10-25% reduction in all seven risk factors could potentially prevent as many as 1·1-3·0 million AD cases worldwide and 184,000-492,000 cases in the USA.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[49]
Karikari T K, Fagan A M, Xiong C, et al. Combined plasma p-tau217 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 5643.
There is only one known portal system in the mammalian brain - that of the pituitary gland, first identified in 1933 by Popa and Fielding. Here we describe a second portal pathway in the mouse linking the capillary vessels of the brain’s clock suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) to those of the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT), a circumventricular organ. The localized blood vessels of portal pathways enable small amounts of important secretions to reach their specialized targets in high concentrations without dilution in the general circulatory system. These brain clock portal vessels point to an entirely new route and targets for secreted SCN signals, and potentially restructures our understanding of brain communication pathways.
[50]
Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Blood biomarkers for monitoring Alzheimer's disease progression[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2022, 21(3): 217-232.
[51]
Wu Y T, Chen C C, Lin H C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of blood-based biomarker screening for preclinical Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Med Econ, 2022, 25(1): 104-113.
[52]
Cummings J L, Aisen P S, Beckett L A, et al. Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2022[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2022, 18(7): e12704.
[53]
Salloway S, Sperling R A, Aisen P S, et al. Biomarker-guided clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(12): 684-696.
[54]
Lowe V J, Sperling R A, Aisen P S, et al. Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2020, 16(7): 990-1001.
[55]
Karikari T K, Fagan A M, Xiong C, et al. Blood biomarkers for subtype-specific Alzheimer's disease diagnosis[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(2): 345-354.

Footnotes

利益冲突声明:所有作者在本研究中不存在任何利益冲突。

PDF(1284 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/