Light emitting diode (LED) applications in the fields of lighting and display have witnessed rapid growth alongside the progression of time and the heightening demands on its performance
[1⇓-3]. CsPbBr
3 quantum dots (QDs) were considered an ideal material for LED device fabrication due to their high photoluminescence (PL) intensity, photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) and color purity
[4⇓-6]. However, the stability of colloidal CsPbBr
3 QDs was relatively low, limiting their application in the fields of LED lighting and display. To address this issues, various strategies including ion doping
[7⇓⇓-10], surface passivation
[11-12], and encapsulation
[13⇓⇓-16] were extensively explored by researchers to optimize and enhance the stability of CsPbBr
3 QDs. Although these current approaches partially improved the stability of CsPbBr
3 QDs, they could only mitigate external factors' corrosion on QDs, resulting in limited protection efficacy in practical applications.
Subsequently, the strategy of encapsulating CsPbBr
3 QDs in glass to form glass-ceramic was discovered by researchers, which effectively isolated CsPbBr
3 QDs from the external environment and significantly enhanced their stability
[17⇓⇓⇓-21], which provided an ideal solution for improving the stability of CsPbBr
3 QDs. However, the use of CsPbBr
3 QDs coated with glass encapsulation, displays various challenges. Firstly, although glass is a transparent material, it inevitable scatters and refracts, attenuating the emitted light intensity and color purity of CsPbBr
3 QDs. Secondly, due to its amorphous nature, the internal structure of glass is complex, necessitating precise manipulation to provide an optimal environment for the formation of CsPbBr
3 QDs within the CsPbBr
3 QDs@glass system. Furthermore, the composition of CsPbBr
3 QDs also exerts an influence on the glass structure. An abundance of Cs promotes the formation of CsPbBr
3 QDs within the glass matrix. However, an excessive amount of Cs
+ disrupts the three-dimensional network structure of glass
[22-23]. Another approach involves substituting PbBr with PbO
[24], which significantly reduces volatility during solvation, enhances the luminescent intensity of CsPbBr
3 QDs, and lowers production costs. Nonetheless, the higher toxicity of PbO than that of PbBr poses a challenge, and the redox implications during the melting process may cause color instability in the glass, thus detrimentally affecting the luminescent properties of CsPbBr
3 QDs and hindering large-scale production of CsPbBr
3 QDs@glass. Introducing Pb
2+ as an extrinsic component into the glass matrix can partially alleviate its viscosity and optimize the glass structure. However, the large radius and high charge of Pb
2+ exert a strong gravitational force on surrounding tetrahedral structures such as [SiO
4] and [BO
4]
[25], rendering the glass structure more densely packed, consequently impacting the luminescent intensity of CsPbBr
3 QDs. Although there is still a need for further investigation into the influence of Pb
2+ on the structure of CsPbBr
3 QDs@glass, substantial findings regarding the overall impact of Pb
2+ on glass have been accumulated
[26⇓⇓-29]. Therefore, deeper understanding into the effect of Pb
2+ on the structure of CsPbBr
3 QDs@glass deserves further research.