Analysis of urban and rural residents'willingness to pay for green electricity and its influencing factors

Jiao HE, Yuqi NIE, Ze YE, Yongfei WU

Electric Power ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8) : 179-193.

Home Journals Electric Power
Electric Power

Abbreviation (ISO4): Electric Power      Chairperson: Changyu OUYANG

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Electric Power ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8) : 179-193. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202603048
Original article

Analysis of urban and rural residents'willingness to pay for green electricity and its influencing factors

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Stimulating green electricity consumption is a key measure for promoting the efficient integration and utilization of renewable energy and plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions in the energy sector and supporting the green and low-carbon transition of the energy sector.However,the key factors influencing urban and rural residents'willingness to pay for green electricity and the mechanisms underlying this willingness remain unclear,and the design of relevant incentive policies lacks a clear basis.This study utilizes survey data from 1417 urban and rural residents in the Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone.By comprehensively applying the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (DBDC-CVM),structural equation modeling(SEM),and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA),the study empirically analyzes the level of willingness to pay for green electricity among urban and rural residents,as well as its influencing factors and configuration pathways.The results indicate that:(1)the willingness to pay for green electricity among urban and rural residents is 18.20 yuan per month,a conclusion that remains valid after robustness testing. (2)Attitude,subjective norms,perceived behavioral control, level of environmental awareness,and policy environment all have significant positive effects on willingness to pay,with perceived behavioral control and subjective norms exerting stronger influences,while the effect of level of environmental awareness is relatively weaker.Tests of mediating effects further indicate that attitude mediates the relationship between level of environmental awareness and willingness to pay. (3)Configurational analysis reveals that perceived behavioral control is the core condition driving high willingness to pay.A relationship of both substitution and synergy exists between subjective norms and the policy environment,with the most significant driving effect observed when the two act synergistically.Based on these findings,it is recommended to strengthen the synergistic driving force of subjective norms and the policy environment,optimize the subscription process,and implement differentiated measures to effectively stimulate urban and rural residents'willingness to pay for green electricity.

Key words

green electricity / willingness to pay / theory of planned behavior / structural equation modeling / fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jiao HE , Yuqi NIE , Ze YE , et al. Analysis of urban and rural residents'willingness to pay for green electricity and its influencing factors[J]. Electric Power. 2026, 59(8): 179-193 https://doi.org/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202603048

References

[1]
KNAPP L, O'SHAUGHNESSY E, HEETER J, et al. Will consumers really pay for green electricity?Comparing stated and revealed preferences for residential programs in the United States[J]. Energy Research&Social Science, 2020, 65: 101457.
[2]
VAN ROOIJEN S N M, VAN WEES M T. Green electricity policiesin the Netherlands:an analysis of policy decisions[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(1):60-71.
[3]
张瑞, 高阳. 上海市绿色电力发展现状及对策思考[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2006, 8(4):47-50.
ZHANG Rui, GAO Yang. The current development and counter- measure consideration of Shanghai green electricity[J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2006, 8(4):47-50.
[4]
路妍, 耿鹏云, 安磊, 等. 我国绿色电力交易对当前电力市场影响效果推演[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(7):156-166.
LU Yan, GENG Pengyun, AN Lei, et al. Deduction of the effect of China's green power trading on the electricity market[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(7):156-166.
[5]
VENKATACHALAM L. The contingent valuation method:a review[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(1): 89-124.
[6]
ALDY J E, KOTCHEN M J, LEISEROWITZ A A. Willingness to pay and political support for a US national clean energy standard[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2(8):596-599.
[7]
吴力波, 周阳, 徐呈隽. 上海市居民绿色电力支付意愿研究[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2018, 28(2):86-93.
WU Libo, ZHOU Yang, XU Chengjun. Research on household's willingness to pay for green power in Shanghai[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(2):86-93.
[8]
DANNE M, MEIER-SAUTHOFF S, MUSSHOFF O. Analyzing German consumers'willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes:a discrete choice experiment[J]. Energy,Sustainability and Society, 2021, 11(1): 15.
[9]
SAUTHOFF S, DANNE M, MUSSHOFF O. To switch or not to switch?-Understanding German consumers'willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes:1707[R]. Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung,Georg-August Universität Göttingen, 2017.
[10]
AYODELE T R, OGUNJUYIGBE A S O, AJAYI O D, et al. Willingness to pay for green electricity derived from renewable energy sources in Nigeria[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 148: 111279.
[11]
BORCHERS A M, DUKE J M, PARSONS G R. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3327-3334.
[12]
ZHANG L, WU Y. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for green electricity among urban residents in China:The case of Jiangsu Province[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 51:514-523.
[13]
OLIVER H, VOLSCHENK J, SMIT E. Residential consumers in the Cape Peninsula's willingness to pay for premium priced green electricity[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2):544-550.
[14]
KIM J, PARK J, KIM J, et al. Renewable electricity as a differentiated good?The case of the Republic of Korea[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 54:327-334.
[15]
ZOGRAFAKIS N, SIFAKI E, PAGALOU M, et al. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(3):1088-1095.
[16]
ZORIĆ J, HROVATIN N. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 47:180-187.
[17]
LEHMANN N, SLOOT D, ARDONE A, et al. Willingness to pay for regional electricity generation-A question of green values and regional product beliefs?[J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 110: 106003.
[18]
NKETIAH E, SONG H M, ADU-GYAMFI G, et al. Does government involvement and awareness of benefit affect Ghanaian's willingness to pay for renewable green electricity?[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 197:683-694.
[19]
AJZEN I. From intentions to actions:a theory of planned behavior[M]// Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior.Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 1985:11-39.
[20]
LITVINE D, WÜSTENHAGEN R. Helping"light green"consumers walk the talk:Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 70(3): 462-474.
[21]
LIN B Q, QIAO Q. Exploring the acceptance of green electricity and relevant policy effect for residents of megacity in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 378: 134585.
[22]
张瑞增, 唐若迪, 姚瑶, 等. TPB-NAM 框架下规模农户绿色优质农产品生产意愿研究:基于江苏省的调查数据[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4):184-194.
ZHANG Ruizeng, TANG Ruodi, YAO Yao, et al. Study on the willingness of large-scale farmers to produce green and high-quality agricultural products under tpb-nam framework:based on survey data of Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(4):184-194.
[23]
周华, 王杜春. 基于结构方程模型的绿色蔬菜消费者购买意愿研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(15):157-163.
ZHOU Hua, WANG Duchun. Study on purchase intention of green vegetable consumers based on structural equation model[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(15):157-163.
[24]
李文超, 邵婧. 消费者环保服装购买行为的影响因素研究:基于计划行为理论和规范激活理论[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 233-244.
LI Wenchao, SHAO Jing. Research on influencing factors of consumers'environmentally friendly clothing purchase behavior: based on theory of planned behavior and norm activation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(6):233-244.
[25]
MOSER A K. Thinking green buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2015, 32(3):167-175.
[26]
吴萌, 甘臣林, 任立, 等. 分布式认知理论框架下农户土地转出意愿影响因素研究:基于 SEM 模型的武汉城市圈典型地区实证分析[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2016(9):62-71.
WU Meng, GAN Chenlin, REN Li, et al. Analysis on influencing factors of farming households'willingness to land conversion under the distributed cognition theory:an empirical evaluation of Wuhan Urban Circle by SEM[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2016(9):62-71.
[27]
WEI J, ZHAO X L, LIU Y J, et al. Measuring purchase intention towards green power certificate in a developing nation:Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105363.
[28]
盛光华, 龚思羽, 解芳. 中国消费者绿色购买意愿形成的理论依据与实证检验:基于生态价值观、个人感知相关性的 TPB 拓展模型[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2019, 59(1):134-145, 222.
SHENG Guanghua, GONG Siyu, XIE Fang. Theoretical basis and empirical test of the formation of Chinese consumers'green purchasing intention[J]. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2019, 59(1):134-145, 222.
[29]
ELAHI E, KHALID Z, ZHANG Z X. Understanding farmers' intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology:a solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 309: 118459.
[30]
CLARK C F, KOTCHEN M J, MOORE M R. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior:Participation in a green electricity program[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(3):237-246.
[31]
WANG B, WANG X M, GUO D X, et al. Analysis of factors influencing residents'habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models:Egoism or altruism?[J]. Energy Policy, 2018, 116:68-77.
[32]
LIKERT R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes[J]. Archives of Psychology, 1932, 140.
[33]
YOO S H, KWAK S Y. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea:a contingent valuation study[J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(12): 5408-5416.
[34]
AREGA T, TADESSE T. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in urban and peri-urban Tigray,northern Ethiopia: Determinants and welfare effects[J]. Energy Policy, 2017, 100: 292-300.
[35]
林龙圳, 郑佳, 林震. 基于条件价值法(CVM)的库布齐沙漠治理支付意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40( 6):190-200. LIN Longzhen,ZHENG Jia,LIN Zhen.Study on willingness to pay and influencing factors of Kubuqi desertification control based on CVM Data[J]. Journal of Desert Research,2020, 40(6):190-200.
[36]
HANEMANN M, LOOMIS J, KANNINEN B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73(4): 1255-1263.
[37]
HAN H, KIM Y. An investigation of green hotel customers'decision formation:Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2010, 29(4):659-668.
[38]
陈明睿, 陈英, 谢保鹏, 等. 计划行为理论视角下农户参与农渠修建的意愿及其影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2024, 38(9): 67-75.
CHEN Mingrui, CHEN Ying, XIE Baopeng, et al. Farmers' willingness to participate in the construction of agricultural canals and its influencing factors:a study from the perspective of planned behavior theory[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2024, 38(9):67-75.
[39]
RAGIN C C. The Comparative Method:Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies[M]. New ed.Oakland: University of California Press, 2014.
[40]
LAM L W. Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65(9): 1328-1334.
[41]
BOLLEN K A, STINE R A. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measuresin structural equation models[J]. Sociological Methods&Research, 1992, 21(2):205-229.
[42]
FISS P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
[43]
SCHNEIDER C Q, ROHLFING I. Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency:formalizing case selection and causal inference[J]. Sociological Methods&Research, 2016, 45(3): 526-568.
[44]
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?-基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):141-155.
DU Yunzhou, LIU Qiuchen, CHENG Jianqing. What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial Activity?A research based on institutional configurations[J].Management World, 2020, 36(9):141-155.
[45]
孔德易, 严艳, 武梦雪. 乡村旅游创业者社会创业意向影响因素研究:基于 SEM 和 fsQCA 的实证分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2025, 39(4):199-208.
KONG Deyi, YAN Yan, WU Mengxue. Factors influencing social entrepreneurial intention of rural tourism entrepreneurs:Empirical analysis based on SEM and fsQCA[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2025, 39(4):199-208.

Funding

Youth Program of National Social Science Foundation of China(No.22CJY064),Social Science Achievement Review Committee Program of Hunan Province (No.XSP22YBZ071),Key Program of the"14th Five-Year" Plan for Educational Science of Hunan Province(ND 229710)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/