Predicting Value of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging and T2 Mapping for Microsatellite Instability in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Lianhua CHENG, Lingyu CHANG, Dexin YU, Qing WANG, Jinzheng JIA, Fang WANG

Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 947-953.

PDF(2083 KB)
Home Journals Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae

Abbreviation (ISO4): Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae      Editor in chief: Xuetao CAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2083 KB)
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 947-953. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16469
Original Articles

Predicting Value of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging and T2 Mapping for Microsatellite Instability in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging(APTw) and T2 mapping in assessing microsatellite instability(MSI) in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Methods The patients with clinically suspected endometrial cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent APTw and T2 mapping before operation.Two radiologists independently outlined the regions of interest and measured the quantitative parameters.The intragroup correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the agreement of MRI parameters measured by the two radiologists.The independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were conducted to compare quantitative variables between the MSI and microsatellite stability(MSS) groups.The receiver operator characteristic curve was established to evaluate the prediction performance of different parameters.The DeLong test was implemented to compare the area under the curve(AUC) between single parameters and their combination. Results Twenty-one patients in the MSI group and 37 patients in the MSS group were finally enrolled in this study.The results showed excellent agreement between two radiologists in assessing MRI parameters.The MSI group had higher APTw values[(2.72±0.52)% vs.(2.08±0.39)%,P<0.001]and lower T2 values[92.25(90.82,99.91) ms vs.101.80(96.15,112.13) ms,P<0.001]than the MSS group.The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the AUC of APTw and T2 values were 0.821(95%CI=0.698-0.909) and 0.793(95%CI=0.666-0.888),respectively.No significant difference in diagnostic efficacy was observed between the two sequences(P=0.692).The combination of APTw and T2 mapping yielded the highest AUC of 0.897(95%CI=0.789-0.961),which was higher than that of APTw and T2 mapping alone(P=0.042,P=0.025,respectively). Conclusions APTw and T2 mapping are valuable in assessing the MSI of endometrial adenocarcinoma,and the combination of the two demonstrates higher diagnostic efficacy,thus providing a basis for the selection of preoperative therapeutic modalities for the patients.

Key words

endometrial adenocarcinoma / amide proton transfer-weighted imaging / T2 mapping / microsatellite instability

Cite this article

Download Citations
Lianhua CHENG , Lingyu CHANG , Dexin YU , et al . Predicting Value of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging and T2 Mapping for Microsatellite Instability in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae. 2025, 47(6): 947-953 https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16469

References

[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.DOI:10.3322/caac.21660.
[2]
Wu X, Snir O, Rottmann D, et al. Minimal microsatellite shift in microsatellite instability high endometrial cancer:a significant pitfall in diagnostic interpretation[J]. Mod Pathol, 2019, 32(5):650-658.DOI:10.1038/s41379-018-0179-3.
[3]
刘召芬, 程洪英, 江森. 微卫星不稳定性及DNA错配修复系统与子宫内膜癌关系的研究进展[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2000(5):49-51.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0529-567X.2000.05.020.
[4]
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Uterine neoplasms,version 1.2018,NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(2):170-199.DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0006.
[5]
Kommoss S, Mcconechy MK, Kommoss F, et al. Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series[J]. Ann Oncol, 2018, 29(5):1180-1188.DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdy058.
[6]
Rousset-Rouviere S, Rochigneux P, Chrétien AS, et al. Endometrial carcinoma:immune microenvironment and emerging treatments in immuno-oncology[J]. Biomedicines, 2021, 9(6):632.DOI:10.3390/biomedicines9060632.
[7]
Vikas P, Messersmith H, Compton C, et al. Mismatch repair and microsatellite instability testing for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy:ASCO endorsement of college of american pathologists guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(10):1943-1948.DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.02462.
[8]
寇玉玲, 王梅, 刘天民, 等. 错配修复/微卫星不稳定性检测技术在子宫内膜癌诊断与治疗中的应用进展[J]. 山东医药, 2024, 64(26):103-106.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.26.024.
[9]
Meng N, Fang T, Feng P, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 54(4):1200-1211.DOI:10.1002/jmri.27684.
[10]
Chryssou EG, Manikis GC, Ioannidis GS, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging in the assessment of tumor grade in endometrial cancer based on intravoxel incoherent motion MRI[J]. Diagnostics(Basel), 2022, 12(3):692.DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12030692.
[11]
Meng N, Wang X, Sun J, et al. Evaluation of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for endometrial carcinoma histological features:a comparative study with diffusion kurtosis imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(11):8388-8398.DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-07966-y.
[12]
Zhang Z, Liu J, Wang W, et al. Feasibility of accelerated T2 mapping for the preoperative assessment of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13:1117148.DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1117148.
[13]
Ray KJ, Simard MA, Larkin JR, et al. Tumor pH and protein concentration contribute to the signal of amide proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Cancer Res, 2019, 79(7):1343-1352.DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2168.
[14]
Ward KM, Aletras AH, Balaban RS. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer(CEST)[J]. J Magn Reson, 2000, 143(1):79-87.DOI:10.1006/jmre.1999.1956.
[15]
Puntmann VO, Isted A, Hinojar R, et al. T1 and T2 mapping in recognition of early cardiac involvement in systemic sarcoidosis[J]. Radiology, 2017, 285(1):63-72.DOI:10.1148/radiol.2017162732.
[16]
Kasar S, Ozturk M, Polat AV. Quantitative T2 mapping of the sacroiliac joint cartilage at 3T in patients with axial spondyloarthropathies[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(2):1395-1403.DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08357-z.
[17]
Brandhofe A, Stratmann C, Schüre JR, et al. T(2) relaxation time of the normal-appearing white matter is related to the cognitive status in cerebral small vessel disease[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2021, 41(7):1767-1777.DOI:10.1177/0271678X20972511.
[18]
Brendel JM, Klingel K, Gräni C, et al. Multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate endomyocardial biopsy-proven chronic myocarditis from healed myocarditis[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 17(10):1182-1195.DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.009.
[19]
Stelloo E, Jansen AML, Osse EM, et al. Practical guidance for mismatch repair-deficiency testing in endometrial cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(1):96-102.DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdw542.
[20]
Lin Y, Luo X, Yu L, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma:comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019, 9(10):1641-1651.DOI:10.21037/qims.2019.08.07.
[21]
Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Nature, 2013, 497(7447):67-73.DOI:10.1038/nature12113.
[22]
Winterhoff B, Thomaier L, Mullany S, et al. Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer and therapeutic implications[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 32(1):76-83.DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000602.
[23]
Arabi H, Guan H, Kumar S, et al. Impact of microsatellite instability(MSI) on survival in high grade endometrial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 113(2):153-158.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.004.
[24]
Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, et al. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI[J]. Nat Med, 2003, 9(8):1085-1090.DOI:10.1038/nm907.
[25]
Howitt BE, Shukla SA, Sholl LM, et al. Association of polymerase e-mutated and microsatellite-instable endometrial cancers with neoantigen load,number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes,and expression of PD-1 and PD-L1[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2015, 1(9):1319-1323.DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2151.
[26]
Meng N, Wang X, Sun J, et al. Application of the amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the study of cervical cancer[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(10):5758-5767.DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-06884-9.
[27]
Ma C, Tian S, Song Q, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging combined with intravoxel incoherent motion for evaluating microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 57(2):493-505.DOI:10.1002/jmri.28287.
[28]
田士峰, 刘爱连, 陈丽华, 等. 酰胺质子转移成像和扩散峰度成像评估子宫内膜癌微卫星不稳定状态[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2022, 33(5):345-349.DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2022.05.009.
[29]
Song Q, Dong W, Tian S, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging with multiple quantitative parameters for predicting microsatellite instability status of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY), 2023, 48(12):3746-3756.DOI:10.1007/s00261-023-04041-6.
[30]
马长军, 田士峰, 陈丽华, 等. T2 mapping联合mDixon-Quant多参数成像定量评估子宫内膜癌微卫星不稳定状态的研究[J]. 磁共振成像, 2022, 13(8):48-54.DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.08.009.
PDF(2083 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/