PDF(1567 KB)
Expert Consensus on Ethical Governance for Clinical Applications of Generative Medical Artificial Intelligence(2025 Edition)
Mengchun GONG, Yonghui MA, Hui PAN, Hua BAI, Hui DAI, Wei CHEN, Hui LIU, Kai GONG, Zhirong ZENG, Hao WU, Yun ZHOU, Zihao OUYANG, Yan LUO, Bohan ZHANG, Junrong LIU, Xunming JI
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 24-37.
PDF(1567 KB)
Abbreviation (ISO4): Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
Editor in chief: Xuetao CAO
PDF(1567 KB)
Expert Consensus on Ethical Governance for Clinical Applications of Generative Medical Artificial Intelligence(2025 Edition)
The research and innovative applications of generative medical artificial intelligence(GMAI)are rapidly advancing in the healthcare field.Significant breakthroughs of GMAI have been achieved in areas such as generating diagnostic suggestions,optimizing treatment plans,and assisting doctor-patient communication,profoundly reshaping the paradigm of clinical diagnosis and treatment.However,the open-ended nature of GMAI’s generation raises novel ethical challenges,including algorithmic bias,ambiguous accountability,data privacy breaches,and insufficient cultural adaptability.Current ethical governance lags behind technological implementation,necessitating the establishment of a standardized governance framework.Our research team assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts spanning medical ethics,clinical medicine,medical artificial intelligence,hospital management,public health,and law.According to the governance logic of “prevention-control-remediation” and integrating international norms with domestic policies,this consensus was developed through two rounds of expert consultation to unify opinions and perspectives.It aims to provide a reference for the specific practice of clinical ethical review in the research and clinical application of GMAI and to establish an authoritative guidance framework for the clinical ethical governance of GMAI,tailored to China’s cultural context and national requirements.
artificial intelligence / generative models / medical ethics / China’s practice
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Rimpi,
|
| [3] |
颜海娜, 唐薇, 王露寒. 基层重大公共卫生风险防控中的敏捷治理机制——基于H街道的新冠肺炎疫情防控个案分析[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(1):113-124.DOI:10.19366/j.cnki.1009-055X.2021.01.012.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
蔡程飞, 李军, 焦一平, 等. 基于深度学习的医学多模态数据融合方法在肿瘤学中的进展和挑战[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2024(3):3-14.DOI:10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2024.03.001.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
孟祥峰, 王浩, 李佳戈. 人工智能医疗器械质量评价测试集样本量分析[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2021, 36(8):4-7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2021.08.001.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health:Guidance on large multi-modal models[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2024.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
郭春镇. 积极应对人口老龄化的法治进路[J]. 法学研究, 2023, 45(1):18.
|
| [31] |
葛晓娟, 郑泽瑞, 吴漾, 等. 英国《良好的医疗实践》对医生行为规范的启示[J]. 医学与哲学, 2025, 46(9):56-59.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.09.11.
|
利益冲突 所有作者声明无利益冲突
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |