Evaluation on the Adaptability of Main Domestic Naked Oat (Avena nuda) Varieties in Bashang Area, North Hebei

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15060018

PDF(1265 KB)

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 7-14. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15060018

Evaluation on the Adaptability of Main Domestic Naked Oat (Avena nuda) Varieties in Bashang Area, North Hebei

赵世锋,曹丽霞,,,,李萌萌 and 郭明

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In order to explicit the adaptabilities of 12 naked oat (Avena nuda) varieties from 6 domestic breeding institutions in the Bashang Area of north Hebei, the adaptability test had been carried out for 3 years. The main characteristics, variation coefficient and variance of grain yield and biomass were analyzed. The results showed that: the biomass of‘Dingyou No.1’,‘Bayou No. 3’and‘Bayou No.1 ’were sensitive to environment, the grain yield of‘Caoyou No.1’,‘Bayou No.1’and‘Jinyan No.14 ’were sensitive to environment, the plant height of‘Bayou No.3’,‘Dingyou No.1’and‘Jinyan No.13 ’were sensitive to environment. The differences of grain yield and biomass of different years were significant, grain yield differences of different varieties were significant, but the differences of biomass of varieties were not significant. The results showed that‘Jinyan No.14’,‘Baiyan No.2’,‘Ningyou No.1’,‘Huazao No.2’,‘Bayou No.1’and‘Baiyan No.11’were suitable for planting as grain varieties,‘Bayou No.3’and‘Jinyan No.13’ were suitable for planting as forage varieties,‘Bayou No.1’,‘Baiyan No.2’,‘Ningyou No.1’and‘Jinyan No.14’were suitable for planting as grain and forage varieties. The early-maturing variety‘Baiyan No.2’, midearly maturing variety‘Jinyan No.14’, mid-maturing variety‘Bayou No.1’and mid-late maturing variety ‘Bayou No.3’were appropriate for growing in Bashang Area of Zhangjiakou.

Key words

Naked Oat; Variety; Grain Yield; Biomass; Adaptive Test; Evaluation

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

赵世锋,曹丽霞,,,,李萌萌 and 郭明. Evaluation on the Adaptability of Main Domestic Naked Oat (Avena nuda) Varieties in Bashang Area, North Hebei[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2016, 6(1): 7-14 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15060018

References

[1] 李成雄王作柱编著《莜麦的栽培与育种》山西人民出版社1984.05
[2] 杨海鹏孙泽民等编《中国燕麦》农业出版社出版1989.12
[3]杨文宪李刚等著《莜麦新品种与高产栽培技术》山西人民出版社2006.04
[4]胡新中魏益民任长忠著《燕麦品质与加工》科学出版社2009.04
[5]任清赵世锋田益玲著《燕麦生产与综合加工利用》中国农业科学技术出版社2011.02
[6]任长忠胡跃高等著《中国燕麦学》中国农业出版社2013.11
[8]董世魁,蒲小朋,马金星,石振田.甘肃天祝高寒地区燕麦品种生产性能评价[J].草地学报,2001,9(1):44-49
[9]焦瑞枣.施氮量对裸燕麦不同品种产量和品质影响的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2004
[10]刘刚,赵桂琴,魏黎明.基于熵权赋权法的灰色系统理论在燕麦品种综合评价中的应用[J].中国草地学报2007,29(3):84-89
[11]赵宁,赵秀芳, 赵来喜,戎郁萍.不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):68-73
[12]王林,刘景辉,李立军,张翠霞. 阴山北麓农牧交错区不同燕麦品种生态适应性研究[J] .内蒙古农业科技,2009,(2):33-34
[13]张志芬,付晓峰,刘俊青,杨海顺.用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 作物学报,2010,36(8):1377-1385
[14]曹丽霞,赵世锋,杨才 ,田长叶,武永祯,李云霞,董占宏,张新军,周海涛,李天亮.水分胁迫处理对燕麦生长的影响及其燕麦品种抗旱性的综合评价[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(1):3-5
[15]赵世锋,曹丽霞,李云霞, 武永祯,田长叶.旱棚条件下燕麦品种的耐旱性评价[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(2) :7-10,23
[16]柴继宽,赵桂琴,师尚礼.7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价[J].草原与草坪,2011,31(2):1-6
[17]罗志娜,赵桂琴,刘欢.24个燕麦品种种子萌发耐盐性综合评价[J].草原与草坪,2012,32(1):34-38,41
[18]徐向英,王岸娜,林伟静,钟葵,周素梅.不同燕麦品种的蛋白质营养品质评价[J].麦类作物学报,2012,32(2):356-360
[19]侯建杰,赵桂琴,焦婷,柴继宽,王红霞. 6个燕麦品种(系)在甘肃夏河地区的适应性评价[J].草原与草坪,2013,33(2):26-37
[20]程玉臣,路战远,张向前,张建中,咸丰,白海,张德健. 旱作雨养条件下5种燕麦品种的生态适应性分析[J].安徽农业科学, 2013,(18):7777-7779#$NL[21]刘彦明,南铭,任生兰,边芳.8个燕麦品种在定西的引种试验初报[J].甘肃农业科技,2014,(9):4-7
[24] 巩爱岐,杜铁瑛,严振英,康海军,秦海蓉.青南牧区种植不同品种燕麦草的灰色综合评价[J].青海草业,1999,(2):17-20
[26] 刘刚,戴良先,李达旭,刘晓英,游明鸿,卞志高,张玉,张昌兵,张丽霞.不同饲用燕麦品种生产性能的综合评价[J].草业与畜牧,2007,(7):1-5,11
[27]王桃,徐长林,姜文清,周志宇.高寒草甸区饲用燕麦品种营养价值综合评价研究[J].中国草地学报,2010,32(3):68-75
[28]赵明义,刘延香.高海拔地区适宜种植燕麦品种生态适应性评价与筛选试验[J].草业与畜牧,2013,(3):16-17
[29]赵宝平,王玉芬,赵萌莉,任鹏,刘景辉.不同饲用燕麦品种抗旱性评价与筛选研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报, 2014,(6):771-775
[30]郭孝,哈斯.莜麦在河南省引种试验的研究[J].草业科学,2004,21(11):35-38
[31]仁青,谢仁卓玛,李志昆,公保才让,拉措吉.北欧4个燕麦品种在高寒地区引种筛选及灰色评价[J].草业与畜牧,2006,(9):23-25
[32]郑曦,魏臻武,武自念,李伟民,陈斐,刘倩,潘玲.不同燕麦品种(系)在扬州地区的适应性评价[J].草地学报,2013,21(2):272-279