Farmland Soil Acidification in Linan City and Its Improvement Technology

谢国雄

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 21-26.

PDF(1612 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1612 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 21-26. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15100001

Farmland Soil Acidification in Linan City and Its Improvement Technology

  • 谢国雄
Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to understand the farmland soil acidification situation in Lin'an City of Zhejiang Province, and provide basis for soil acidification control, the trend and characteristics of soil acidification of different types of farmland in Lin'an were systematically analyzed based on the soil fertility survey. The results showed that the double effect of both natural and human activities had caused obvious farmland acidification in Lin'an. The proportion of strongly acidic soil (pH<4.5) and acidic soil (pH 4.5- 5.4) was 23.4% and 46.6% , respectively. The soil used for tea, mulberry and bamboo production showed the most obvious acidification, the farmland in Lin'an was severely acidified compared with the data obtained in 1982. Excessive fertilization and acid rain were major causes of farmland soil acidification. In order to prevent further acidification, in addition to rational application of fertilizers, it was necessary to learn experiences from both home and abroad, and take methods, such as inorganic improvement technology, organic improvement technology, bioremediation technology and biochar application, for farmland soil acidification control and improvement.

Key words

Lin'an City; Farmland Soil; Land Use; Soil Acidification; Improvement Technology

Cite this article

Download Citations
谢国雄. Farmland Soil Acidification in Linan City and Its Improvement Technology[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2016, 6(3): 21-26 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15100001

References

[1]Xu Z J, Liu G S, Yu J D. Soil acidification and nitrogen cycle disturbed by man-made factors[J]. Geology-geochemistry, 2002, 30(2): 74-78.
[2]van Breemen N, Mulder J, Driscoll C T. Acidification and alkalinization of soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 1983, 75:283-308
[3]Barak P, Jobe B O, Krueger A R, et al. Effects of long-term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertolizer inputs in Wisconsin[J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 197(1): 61-69.
[4]de Vries W, Breeuwsma A. The relation between soil acidification and element cycling[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1987, 35(3-4): 293-310.
[5]易杰祥, 吕亮雪, 刘国道. 土壤酸化和酸性土壤改良研究[J]. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2006, 12(1):23-28.
[6]Xue N D, Liao B H, Liu P. On soil acidification status under acid deposition in two small catchments in Hunan[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2005, 31(1): 82-86.
[7]李继红.我国土壤酸化的成因与防控研究[J]. 农业灾害研究2012,2(6):42-45.
[8]杨世琦, 张爱平, 杨正礼, 等. 黄土高原果园土壤pH变化分析[J]. 中国农业生态学报, 2010, 18(6): 1385-1387.
[9]郭治兴, 王静, 柴敏, 等. 近30年来广东省土壤pH值的时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(2): 425-430.
[10]李继红.我国土壤酸化的成因与防控研究[J]. 农业灾害研究2012,2(6):42-45.
[11]王辉,董元华,安琼,等.高度集约化利用下蔬菜地土壤酸化及次生盐渍化研究--以南京市南郊为例[J].土壤,2005,37(5):530-533.
[12]王志刚,赵永存,廖启林,等.近20年来江苏省土壤pH值时空变化及其驱动[J].生态学报,28(2):720-727.
[13]张永春,汪吉东,沈明星,等.长期不同施肥对太湖地区典型土壤酸化的影响[J].土壤学报,2010,47(3):465-472.
[14]曹丹,张倩,肖峻,等.江苏省典型茶园土壤酸化速率定位研究[J].茶叶科学, 2009,29(6):443-448.
[15] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327:1008~1010.
[16]黄芳.集约经营雷竹林土壤氮素、磷时空变化的研究[D]. 浙江林学院硕士学位论文,2008.
[17]刘国群, 庄舜尧, 李国栋, 等.不同种植年限下雷竹林土壤中铝的形态变化[J]. 土壤, 2008, 40(6):1013-1016.
[18]孟赐福,傅庆林,水建国,等. 浙江中部红壤施用石灰对土壤交换性钙、镁及土壤酸度的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5 ( 2) : 129 – 136
[19]徐仁扣. 酸化红壤的修复原理与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[20]王代长, 胡红青, 李学垣. 酸性土壤上磷矿粉释磷机理与农学效应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9):242-245.
[21]李九玉,王宁,徐仁扣.工业副产品对红壤酸度改良研究[J].土壤,2009,41(6):932-939.
[22]Wang N, Li J Y, Xu R K. Use of various agricultural by-products to study the pH effects in an acid tea garden soil[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2009, 25:128-132.
[23]龙光强,蒋瑀霁,孙波.长期施用猪粪对红壤酸度的改良效应[J].土壤,201 2,44(5):727—734
[24]Baker G H, Barrett V J, Carter P J, et al. Abundance of earthworms in soils used for cereal production in southeastern Australia and their role in reducing soil acidity//Date R A, et al. (eds). Plant Soil Interaction at Low PH. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands:213-218.
[25]万 青, 徐仁扣, 黎星辉. 酸性条件下氮素形态对西红柿根系羟基释放的影响[J]. 土壤, 1999. 43(4):554-557.
[26]谢少华,宗良纲,禇慧,等.不同类型生物质材料对酸化茶园土壤的改良效果[J].茶叶科学,2013,33(3):279-288.
[27]袁金华,徐仁扣.生物质炭对酸性土壤改良作用的研究进展[J].土壤,2012,44(40:541-547.
[28]Yuan J H, Xu R K, Zhang H. The forms of Alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102: 3488-3497.
PDF(1612 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/