Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Layered Zeolites and Their Catalysis, Adsorption and Separation Applications

  • Shiyu Hu 1 ,
  • Yueer Yan , 2, * ,
  • Yahong Zhang 1 ,
  • Zhendong Wang 3 ,
  • Yi Tang , 1, *
Expand
  • 1 Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
  • 2 Institute for Preservation and Conservation of Chinese Ancient Books, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • 3 State Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Engineering and Industrial Catalysis, SINOPEC Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201208
* e-mail: (Yueer Yan);

Received date: 2023-07-18

  Revised date: 2023-11-21

  Online published: 2024-02-26

Supported by

National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFA0209402)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(22072028)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(22088101)

Shanghai Natural Science Foundation(22ZR1407200)

Abstract

Compared with three-dimensional zeolites, two-dimensional layered zeolites have greater advantages in many fields, with larger surface area, shorter diffusion distance and more ductile structure. In recent years, the research on two-dimensional layered zeolites has become a new hotspot. Based on previous research and summary, this article summarizes the synthesis methods of two-dimensional zeolites in the past five years from two types of synthesis perspectives (bottom-up and top-down methods), with a focus on reviewing the progress of different synthesis methods for the same topology of zeolite. In addition, this article briefly describes the applications of two-dimensional zeolites in the fields of catalysis, adsorption, and separation and looks forward to the broad application prospects of two-dimensional zeolites so as to provide theoretical guidance and reference basis for the synthesis and application of two-dimensional zeolites.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Synthesis of two-dimensional layered zeolites

2.1 Bottom-up synthesis method

2.2 Top-down synthesis method

3 Application of two-dimensional layered zeolite

3.1 Catalysis

3.2 Adsorption

3.3 Separation membrane

4 Conclusion and outlook

Cite this article

Shiyu Hu , Yueer Yan , Yahong Zhang , Zhendong Wang , Yi Tang . Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Layered Zeolites and Their Catalysis, Adsorption and Separation Applications[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2024 , 36(3) : 319 -334 . DOI: 10.7536/PC230716

1 Introduction

In recent years, with the in-depth study of zeolite materials, the intrinsic characteristics of zeolite structure have gradually become a limiting factor for its further development, resulting in many challenges in traditional applications such as catalysis, adsorption and separation, as well as emerging applications such as functional membranes, sensing and storage. Therefore, the synthesis and application of new zeolite materials, such as ultra-large microporous framework zeolite, hierarchical pore zeolite, highly dispersed nano-zeolite flakes and their aggregates, self-supporting thin layer or foam structure zeolite, have become the research focus in the field of catalysis, providing abundant new methods and processes for the design, preparation and application of catalysts[1~4].
Zeolite materials are traditionally defined as a three-dimensional periodic framework structure with microporous channels formed by silicon-oxygen tetrahedra and aluminum-oxygen tetrahedra through shared oxygen atoms, based on the shape selectivity caused by molecular configuration diffusion within the microporous domain.As well as the flexible adjustability of multiple active sites such as skeleton bridging hydroxyl acid sites, isolated heteroatom oxidation sites, metal species loading and coating, the developed zeolite catalyst has made irreplaceable contributions in the fields of petrochemical industry and fine organic chemical industry. When one dimension of the zeolite crystal is less than a few nanometers and the other two dimensions are not restricted, it is called a two-dimensional zeolite[5]. Compared with three-dimensional zeolites, the specific surface area of two-dimensional zeolites is greatly increased, and according to the characteristics of layered materials, a variety of synthesis methods can be developed, such as swelling, exfoliation, pillared, etc. Two-dimensional zeolites not only maintain the unique framework acid sites and related advantages of zeolites, but also have a large, accessible, easily adjustable outer surface, and a short diffusion path, which make them the leader in catalysis and other research.
With the development of zeolite synthesis technology and framework structure analysis technology, it is gradually found that many zeolites can be deconstructed into two-dimensional zeolite crystal layers. Among the more than 250 framework types identified by the International Zeolite Association (IZA), more than 20 are recognized as candidates for two-dimensional crystal layers (Figure 1).Some of them, such as MWW, FER, CDO, CAS, RRO, RWB, MTF, RTH, HEU, NSI, etc., have successfully prepared the corresponding two-dimensional layered zeolite precursors (including discrete two-dimensional crystal layers, ordered stacks of polycrystalline layers, etc.) Through direct hydrothermal synthesis (Bottom-up) or selective bond-breaking deconstruction synthesis (Top-down)[4,6,7]. However, according to the data of the International Zeolite Association, only about 5% of the more than 200 zeolite structures documented have been synthesized into 2D structures[8]. Most of the zeolite two-dimensional crystal layer or zeolite layered precursors lose the unique micropore shape selectivity of three-dimensional zeolite except for a few (such as MCM-22 (P)) which have intralaminar micropores, but they contain zeolite framework acidic sites, isolated heteroatom oxidation active sites and cation exchange sites.The unique large external surface area, highly exposed acid sites, highly accessible cation sites, unique bowl-shaped semi-cage structure (such as MCM-22 (P), PREFER, etc.), adjustable framework element composition and abundant surface silanol array of two-dimensional zeolite crystal layer bring full imagination to its application in catalysis, adsorption and separation[2,4,6].
图1 IZA已认定的沸石拓扑结构,黄色图标为已确认的具有层状形式的结构

Fig. 1 Zeolite frameworks approved by the IZA Structure Commission in the alphabetical order and the confirmed structures with layered forms (yellow)

The structural characteristics of two-dimensional zeolite and its unique advantages have attracted wide attention of researchers at home and abroad[9]. Wang et al. Summarized the synthesis and application of MFI nanosheet zeolite, focusing on the formation mechanism of nanosheet MFI[9]; Guo et al. Summarized in detail the methods of controlling the synthesis of b-oriented MFI zeolite membranes from the aspects of seed synthesis, seed coating method and the composition of secondary growth solution[10]; Che et al. Focused on the progress of self-assembly of amphiphilic molecules to obtain ordered layered zeolites[11].
Based on the previous literature, this paper summarizes the progress of different synthesis methods of the same type of zeolite, and focuses on the new development of classical synthesis methods and the new synthesis methods proposed recently, such as Li et al.Tang's research group proposed a new preparation method combining soft chemical exfoliation and micro-blasting, and Hao et al proposed a dual-template system to synthesize ultra-thin zeolite, which is convenient for a rapid and comprehensive understanding of the progress of two-dimensional zeolite[12][13,14][15]. In addition, the latest progress of two-dimensional zeolite in the fields of catalysis, adsorption and separation in recent years was summarized, and the future development of synthesis and application of two-dimensional zeolite was prospected.The new concept of "two-dimensional nanocrystalline layer microreactor" based on microchannel assembly technology, the new characteristics of "quasi-phase transfer catalyst" based on reversible polymerization and dispersion of flexible structure development, and the new concept of "pseudo-homogeneous catalytic reaction" in the conversion of macromolecular reaction substrates catalyzed by highly discrete layered catalysts were put forward.In order to provide a reference for the synthesis and application of two-dimensional zeolite.

2 Synthesis of two-dimensional layered zeolite

Traditional synthesis methods of three-dimensional zeolites generally refer to crystallization from a suitable gel or solution under hydrothermal conditions. However, in the usual hydrothermal synthesis, the ordered stacking structure of multilayer two-dimensional zeolite crystal layers filled with various organic templates (or called layered zeolite, zeolite layered precursor, etc.) And the polymorphic intergrowth structure formed by dislocation stacking (such as ECNU-5P) are more obtained.They show the unique diffraction patterns of layered materials in XRD diffraction, and in the subsequent heat treatment to remove the organic template, the topological condensation reaction occurs between the silicon hydroxyl groups on the surface of adjacent crystal layers, thus forming a typical three-dimensional framework structure (or substructure zeolite materials)[16,17][4,6,18~20]. It is also possible to form three-dimensional framework zeolites with different topological frameworks and pore structures (such as CDO and FER zeolites) by changing the stacking mode of zeolite crystal layers (such as RUB-36 and PREFER-1) through the mutual replacement of interlayer templates in the post-modification or post-synthesis process[21]. Although there are also special cases of layered zeolite materials with (partially) disordered stacking of crystal layers, such as MCM-56, due to the fact that the crystal layers are stacked in a face-to-face manner, the increased exposure of the interlayer surface is limited, and the synthesis conditions are difficult to control accurately, three-dimensional MWW zeolite materials, such as MCM-49, will be formed after prolonging the hydrothermal synthesis time[22][16].
Accordingly, researchers have developed a variety of synthesis and post-treatment approaches to achieve high accessibility of the interlayer surface, such as the use of surfactants to achieve interlayer swelling and the insertion of organosilicon esters to form pillared structures (such as MCM-36)[4]; Or using a specially designed structure-directing agent to obtain a two-dimensional zeolite by a limited crystal growth mechanism; Or the alkaline treated expansion material is used for interlayer expansion to synthesize the new structure zeolite (IEZ zeolite), and the latter can further realize the modulation of more structure types and pore structures through various post-treatment methods[4,6,18,23~27][28]. The stacking structure of these ordered or partially ordered zeolite two-dimensional crystal layers can be treated by ultrasonic wave after surfactant swelling to obtain discrete monolayer or oligolayer zeolite crystal layers (such as ITQ-2, ITQ-6, etc.).To fully expose its surface acid sites, interfacial silanol groups and/or unique semi-cage structure, which lays a foundation for the further development of pseudo-homogeneous liquid-solid macromolecular catalytic reactions[4,6,18,29].
At present, the synthesis methods of two-dimensional zeolites can be summarized as two kinds: one is the bottom-up method, which refers to the direct synthesis of two-dimensional zeolites from raw materials, such as direct hydrothermal synthesis or structure-directing agent template synthesis; The other is the top-down method, which refers to the conversion from three-dimensional zeolite to two-dimensional zeolite, such as the indirect secondary exfoliation strategy.

2.1 Bottom-up synthesis

Among the bottom-up synthesis methods, the solvothermal method is the most popular and the commonly used solvent is water, as shown in Figure 2. The most important synthesis method in hydrothermal method is the structure-directing agent template method, which has been developed for nearly a hundred years, and the related synthesis processes are also very mature. In recent years, with the design and development of more structure-directing agents, this method has been developing towards green and low-cost.
图2 二维沸石自下而上合成示意图

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of bottom-up synthesis of 2D zeolite

2.1.1 Structure-directing agent template method

Jeon et al. Synthesized monolayer zeolite nanocrystalline layers with high aspect ratio by hydrothermal epitaxy[30]. They used [bis-1,5 (tripropyl ammonium) pentamethylene diiodide] (dCA) as an Organic structure direction agent (OSDA) and added MFI seeds for gel crystallization. In the initial stage of growth (20 – 40 H), the 30 nm seed slowly grew into 140 nm columnar crystals. The crystal growth changed dramatically over the next few hours. A nanocrystalline layer appears at the edge of the columnar seed and continues to grow around the seed along the (011) plane, forming a 5 nm thick MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer. The monolayer MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer synthesized by this method requires the use of expensive OSDA, and the yield is low[31].
Corma et al. Proposed a dual-template system composed of Hexamethylene (HMI), a commonly used template for the synthesis of MWW-type zeolite, and a second template with surfactant properties to prepare a single/double-layer mixed growth MWW-type DS-ITQ-2 zeolite with an external specific surface area of 300 m2/g[32]; Rom Román-Leshkov et al. Designed a surfactant-like template and synthesized MIT-1 zeolite containing discrete MWW two-dimensional crystal layers with an external surface area of 500 m2/g by drawing on the concept of multi-quaternary ammonium head surfactant template proposed by Ryoo et al[33][34]. In the synthesis of B-Ti-MWW zeolite using piperidine as a framework template, Yang et al. Obtained a thin layer of Ti-MWW zeolite with a thickness of about 15 nm (~ 6 layers) by adding a silanization reagent to seal the silicon hydroxyl groups at the crystal layer interface during crystallization, supplemented by acidification treatment[35]. Yang et al. Also successfully developed a more simple and feasible synthesis route of discrete MWW two-dimensional crystal layer, using HMI as the MWW framework structure directing agent and Dicyclohexylamine (DCHA) with larger size as the auxiliary template for interlayer filling barrier.Controllable single/double crystal layer zeolites (SCM-6, SCM-1) were synthesized by one step. It was found that SCM-1 with double crystal layer structure had higher product purity and stability, and showed great advantages in the liquid phase alkylation of benzene with ethylene in which the crystal layer interface semi-cage structure was the catalytic active region[36]. Compared with the previously reported preparation methods of zeolite two-dimensional crystal layer, this method uses a cheaper second template, which reduces the synthesis cost, and the simple one-step synthesis process avoids the damage of crystal layer structure caused by the post-treatment process such as secondary exfoliation.
Recently, Wu et al. Reported a multilayer MOR zeolite with a nanosheet thickness of ∼ 10 nm, using a diamine surfactant with benzyl and C16 alkyl chains as the two heads[37]. The continuous growth of the MOR structure along the B axis is blocked, resulting in a highly exposed 8-membered ring pore. Rimer et al. Reported the preparation of two-dimensional MWW-type zeolite nanocrystalline layer by one-step method (Fig. 3), and the results showed that in the conventional MCM-22 synthesis system, by adding the surfactant Hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide,CTAB) can be used to synthesize disordered two-dimensional MWW materials d8.0-MWW with an average thickness of 3. 5 nm and cross-lamellar growth in one step, and CTA+ ions can also modulate the lattice Al atoms, but the effectiveness of CTAB is limited by the Si/Al ratio of the synthesis system (such as Si/Al = 15 ~ 30)[38].
图3 一步法制备表面增强活性二维MWW型沸石纳米晶层[38]

Fig. 3 Enhanced surface activity of MWW zeolite nanosheets prepared via a one-step synthesis[38]. Copyright © 2020, American Chemical Society

2.1.2 Interlayer self-supporting synthesis method

In order to reduce the interlayer condensation of layered zeolite during calcination and improve the overall strength of layered zeolite, structural modification of layered zeolite is usually needed. Two-dimensional layered zeolites templated by long-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium salts are usually supported by interlayer columns to prevent interlayer condensation during calcination[39]. The interlayer pillared method can only limit the interlayer extension, while the silanol group formed on the scaffold will make the zeolite more hydrophilic and promote the adsorption of polar products, especially the epoxidation products are easy to further hydrolyze into diols under acid catalysis. In addition, most of the resulting silicon pillars are unstable and decomposed by atmospheric moisture after being placed in the environment for several months, and the nanocrystalline layer can easily collapse when the sample is compressed[40]. It is well known that rotational boundaries are prevalent in MFI zeolites, and there is an overgrowth relationship between the (h00) plane and the (0k0) plane, where a large number of (h00) planes grow epitaxially on the (0k0) plane[41][42]. The self-supporting structure is realized by the mutual 90 ° rotation growth between the nanocrystalline layers, which eliminates the subsequent expansion and pillared operation, and also prevents the excessive collapse between the layers caused by the lamellar zeolite in the process of removing the template. Through the formation of two-dimensional zeolite with interlayer self-supporting structure, the collapse problem in the calcination process can be effectively solved, and the mesoporous properties of two-dimensional zeolite can be improved through the dense stacking between layers.

2.1.2.1 Phenyl quaternary ammonium salt template

The long-range ordered interlayer mesopores of MFI nanosheets induced by [C22H45-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-C6H13]Br2(C22-6-6) can only be stabilized and preserved by the post-treatment of interlayer pillared. Xu et al. Employed a Bola-type amphiphile, C6H13-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-(CH2)n-O-C6H4-C6H4-O-(CH2)n-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-C6H13(4Br-)(BCPh-n-6-6), with a bis-quaternary ammonium group and a biphenyl group as a structure-directing agent[43]. MFI nanosheets were synthesized by PI-PI stacking between aryl groups. The existence of biphenyl group and diquaternary ammonium group in the template molecule greatly reduces the binding energy of the synthesis system, which is beneficial to the rotation of the zeolite sheet. The results show that only the samples with n = 6 or n = 8 have a distinct house of cards structure of 90 ° rotated crystals for the monolayer zeolite nanocrystal layers synthesized using the BCPh-n-6-6 template (n = 4, 6, 8, 10, or 12). The (100) surface is overgrown on the (010) surface, and the abundant interlayer mesopores can be well preserved by rotating the growth dendrite structure even if the Bola-type surfactant is removed. This phenomenon indicates that the high matching of molecular size and distance between adjacent MFI sheets can promote the continuous 90 ° rotation of the structure. The template with appropriate chain length is beneficial to the formation of free-standing MFI nanosheets, and the distance between layers can be controlled by adjusting the length of the carbon chain, thereby controlling the size of the mesopores.
Based on the work of Xu et al., Li et al. Synthesized TS-1 nanosheets with a 90 ° rotation structure by a hydrothermal one-pot method using Bola-type template BCPh-12-6-6 as a structure-directing agent[12]. Even though the template was removed by calcination, the multilayer structure did not completely collapse, and its specific surface area was significantly improved by the connection and vertical growth of the skeleton, providing a considerable amount of interlayer pores. The open boundary structure not only significantly shortens the micropore diffusion length and improves the accessibility of active sites, but also solves the problem of low hydrothermal stability and weak activity caused by the amorphous framework structure of microporous titanosilicate zeolites. Thereafter, the synthesized sample was subjected to fluorination treatment with ammonium fluoride (NH4F) to reduce the concentration of silanol groups and improve the hydrophobicity of the zeolite. Fluorination treatment before calcination can effectively prevent the structural collapse and the adverse effect of fluoride ions on Ti active sites.
Most surfactant aggregates have a sheet-like structure. Shen et al. Formed an amphiphilic template by introducing azobenzene at the hydrophobic end C6H5-2N-C6H4-O-C10H20-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+-(CH3)2-C6H13(2Br)( is denoted as Cazo-10-6-6[42]. The formation of highly ordered mesoporous zeolites can be guided by amphiphilic molecules self-assembled from helical cylindrical micelles. The synthesized zeolite is tetragonal with an average size of 1.5 μm. The MFI sheet with a thickness of about 3 nm is rotated at 90 ° to form a mesoporous structure, and the synthesized sample still maintains an ordered mesoporous structure after the template is removed by calcination. By calculating the chain length of Cazo-n-6-6(n=6, 8, 10, 12) in detail, it is found that the subsequent Cazo-10-6-6 with a chain length of ~ 1.2 nm can be geometrically matched to form ordered MFI zeolite square mesopores with a width of about three pentasil layers. This phenomenon indicates that the high geometric matching between the chain length of the templating agent and the MFI framework is a prerequisite for the formation of 90 ° -rotated alternating nanocrystalline layer zeolites.

2.1.2.2 Double template method

It is difficult to form a densely stacked self-supporting structure by using the long-chain alkyl bis-quaternary ammonium salt template alone. Emdadi et al. Employed the strategy of synergistic synthesis of quaternary ammonium surfactant C22-6-6 and molecular template Tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH)[44]. In the synthesis process of zeolite, the C22-6-6 guides the formation of zeolite sheets, and the molecular template guides the formation of self-supporting structure between zeolite layers, thus realizing the one-step synthesis of MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layers with micro/mesoporous structure. When the molar ratio of TPAOH/C22-6-6 was adjusted from 0/10 to 20/10, the morphology and porosity of the synthesized zeolite nanocrystalline layer were systematically adjusted, and the morphology varied from intricate (randomly organized nanosheet particles interwoven with each other) to house of cards structure, and then to dense stacking plate morphology, as shown in Fig. 4. TPAOH can be used as an auxiliary template to induce the growth size of zeolite nanosheets in three dimensions, and the staggered nanosheets can be used as pillars to support each other and maintain a good mesoporous structure during calcination. Hao et al. Used HMI and Dimethyloctadecyl [3- (trimethoxysilyl) proyl] ammonium chloride (TPOAC) to form a dual-template system to synthesize Single layer MWW zeolites SL-MWW, and revealed the Single layer MWW zeolites from the point of view of the equilibrium rate between the nucleation and growth of MWW nanocrystals and the infiltration of organosilane into the unit cell[15]. On this basis, Tang's group further obtained a bifunctional catalyst Zr-OL-MWW with two-dimensional thin layers by direct grafting of zirconium species, which showed excellent catalytic activity in cascade Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley (MPV) reduction and cinnamaldehyde (CAL) etherification[45].
图4 用C22-6-6/TPAOH摩尔比为10/0(a)、10/1(b)、10/2(c)、10/3(d)、10/5(e)、10/8(f)、10/12(g)和10/20(h)制备的MFI沸石的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像[44]。Si/Al比为~40(i)的商用MFI沸石作为对照

Fig. 4 SEM images of MFI zeolites obtained with C22-6-6/TPAOH molar ratio of (a) 10/0, (b) 10/1, (c) 10/2, (d) 10/3, (e) 10/5, (f) 10/8, (g) 10/12, and (h) 10/20, respectively, in the dual template synthesis. (i) Commercial MFI with Si/Al ratio of ∼40 was used for comparison[44]. Copyright © 2014, American Chemical Society

Based on the synthesis of layered TS-1 zeolite with Bola-type surfactant BCPh-12-6-6, Liu's team added TPAOH as an auxiliary template to induce self-supporting and self-shearing of layered structure, and synthesized layered TS-1 zeolite with stable mesoporous structure and long-range order by one-pot method[46]. After the template was removed by calcination, a stable interlayer mesoporous structure was formed due to the highly staggered growth of nanosheets, which avoided the excessive collapse of zeolite. Unlike single-templated TS-1, dual-templated multilayer TS-1 has a highly expanded structure, increasing the surface area of the zeolite. The addition of TPAOH can adjust the coordination state of titanium species in layered TS-1 (LTS-1) zeolite, providing more accessible Ti active sites for reactants.
Although the Bottom-up synthesis method is mature, the synthesis results usually have strong non-directivity, and even the specially designed template can only be analyzed by trial and error. In addition, structure-directing agents are usually quaternary ammonium salts and other substances, which have a great impact on the environment. Avoiding the excessive use of structure-directing agents is also one of the current research directions of two-dimensional zeolite synthesis. Therefore, top-down synthesis, as an alternative method, has made rapid progress in recent years.

2.2 Top-down synthesis

Top-down synthesis is mainly to convert three-dimensional zeolite into two-dimensional zeolite, which is usually used to synthesize the lamellar structure of known zeolite, and can obtain the target structure more accurately. The main steps of Top-down focus on the post-treatment stage after synthesis, which usually includes swelling, exfoliation, pillared and other modification processes, as shown in Figure 5. The swelling is the first step of the post-treatment synthesis, and the exfoliation and pillared methods are based on the swollen zeolite precursor. Top-down synthesis is described in detail below.
图5 二维沸石自上而下合成示意图

Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of top-down synthesis of 2D zeolite

2.2.1 Twice-stripping strategy

At present, part of the means to obtain monolayer zeolite nanocrystalline layers relies on the indirect secondary exfoliation strategy of their ordered (or partially ordered) multilayer zeolite crystal layer stacking structure. Monolayer MFI nanosheets are usually prepared by a multi-step method, in which the multilayer MFI zeolite nanosheets are first exfoliated, and then the unexfoliated particles are removed by centrifugation[47][48]. Varoon et al. First achieved exfoliation of MFI nanosheet monolayers by melt blending technique[47~49]. The MFI nanosheet suspension was obtained by first exfoliating the multilayer nanosheets, followed by dissolution, ultrasonic dispersion, and centrifugal purification. Removal of the polymer by calcination or other heat treatment usually results in a significant curling of the sample, but relatively flat nanosheets can be obtained by dissolution and purification. When the nanosheet-polystyrene mixture was sonicated in toluene, the polymer was dissolved by centrifugation and the larger particles were removed, and the monolayer M FI zeolite nanocrystal layer with high purity was obtained. However, this method still has some problems, such as time-consuming and uneconomical, and the generated nanosheets are small and non-uniform in size[47,48,50]. In addition, MFI nanosheets are difficult to separate from the polymer solution with high concentration, which can easily contaminate the MFI nanosheet solution.
In subsequent work, Zhang et al. Used piranha solution to treat multilayer M FI zeolite exfoliated from polystyrene melt blends to remove organic residues[50]. Sabnis et al. Isolated multilayer M FI zeolite by dispersing a layered zeolite precursor in polybutadiene followed by short shear or sonication at room temperature[51]. Guo et al. Repeatedly treated multilayer MFI zeolite with piranha solution to remove the template, and then carried out ultrasonic exfoliation and precipitation purification in water to obtain monolayer MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer aqueous solution with aspect ratio up to 100[52]. Ultrasonic treatment is difficult to control the exfoliation process and easily leads to the fragmentation of flakes, resulting in the formation of large-diameter monolayers.
The exfoliation method can also be used for two-dimensional lamella exfoliation of MWW topology. The exfoliation method in organic base system (pH = 12.5 ~ 13.8) developed by Corma as a representative has obtained a high external surface zeolite material named ITQ-2 with a specific surface area of 700 m2/g, which shows its excellent catalytic performance in macromolecular and diffusion-controlled chemical reactions[29]. However, this method is difficult to control, and many subsequent studies have shown that the zeolite framework structure is easily damaged during swelling and/or ultrasonic treatment due to the presence of strong bases (such as quaternary ammonium bases) and surfactants (such as CTAB) in the system.Amorphous impurities are produced or mesoporous materials such as MCM-41 are formed, and aluminum and other heteroatoms are easily separated from the framework during ultrasonic and acidification treatment, forming framework defects, which not only reduce the acidity of zeolite, but also lead to the reduction of framework active sites[53~55]. Therefore, Katz and Zones developed a stripping method under mild conditions (pH = 9) in quaternary ammonium salt and CTAB systems containing fluorine and chlorine, and successively realized the effective stripping of MCM-22 (P) in water phase and PPEFER, SSZ-70 and their heteroatom-containing multilayer zeolite crystal layer stacks in organic phase (such as DMF)[53~55]. Furthermore, Katz, Zone and Ouyang et al. Developed the effective exfoliation of simple inorganic aluminum salts and zinc salts from multilayer superposed structures (ERB-1P, B-SSZ-70) of various boron-containing zeolite crystal layers in acidic system.Tsapatsis and Fan successively developed the exfoliation of swollen MCM-22 (P) by the shear force of polystyrene or end-group modified polybutadiene system to obtain discrete zeolite two-dimensional crystal layers which are easy to prepare membranes, and verified their advantages in diffusion-dominated gas separation or macromolecular reactions[56-58][47,51].
It has also been reported that at room temperature, the layer exfoliation of multilayer (partially) disordered stack MCM-56 with weak crystal layer interaction can be achieved by using a large volume of simple quaternary ammonium strong base, but the similar method for MCM-22 (P) with ordered crystal layer stacking needs to be repeated many times to improve the yield of oligolayer products[59][60]. It is worth noting that these methods often need to use strong organic bases which may cause framework damage, heteroatom shedding and environmental pollution, or need to operate in organic solvent media to bring environmental problems in the post-treatment.Or it is necessary to add metal salts to introduce impurity residues or cause isomorphous substitution of framework elements, or there are some restrictions on interlayer interaction forces and stacking modes, which leads to the complexity of research and practice.
In recent years, Čejka et al. Selectively removed the interlayer germanium-rich d4r subunit from UTL germanium-silicate in acidic medium to produce a layered zeolite IPC-1P, which was then treated by calcination or interlayer silicification to produce a series of new zeolites (IPC-n) with adjustable interlayer pore size[61]. This strategy of constructing new zeolites from layered intermediates derived from germanosilicates is called ADOR method, which includes many steps such as Assembly, Disassembly, Organization and Reassembly. This method has been successfully generalized to ITH, IWR, IWW, UOV, and SAZ-1 (Fig. 6)[62][63~65][66][67]. Subsequently, Wu et al. Realized the structural transformation of CIT-13 germanosilicate into ECNU-21 and ECNU-23, two new zeolites, through a layered intermediate in weak alkaline medium, because CIT-13 germanosilicate is rich in Si d4r subunits in acidic medium, in which stable Si-O-Si bonds exist and cannot be transformed[68,69]. Davis et al. Also reported a CIT-14 zeolite similar to ECNU-23 by post-treatment of CIT-13[70].
图6 不同硅锗比水解沸石的SEM图像[62]。ITH-4(A), ITH-10(B), ITR-2(C), ITR-3(D), 0.1B-IWR-2(E), 0.1B-IWR-6(F), and 0.1B-IWR-2(G)

Fig. 6 SEM image of ITH-4 (A), ITH-10 (B), ITR-2 (C), ITR-3 (D), 0.1B-IWR-2 (E), 0.1B-IWR-6 (F), and 0.1B-IWR-2 (G)[62]. Copyright © 2014, American Chemical Society

Recently, Tang's group proposed a combination of liquid soft chemical exfoliation and hydrogen peroxide-induced microblasting to prepare highly dispersed porous MWW thin zeolite nanocrystalline layers[13,14]. According to the method, ethanolamine (ETA) which has stronger hydrogen bonds with a MWW lamellar silicon hydroxyl array and solvent water molecules is used as a stripping agent, and a large amount of oligolamellar MWW zeolite material ETA-OL-MWW rich in two-dimensional sheets is obtained in a zeolite colloidal dispersion, wherein the oligolamellar MWW zeolite material ETA-OL-MWW can not be settled for a long time and has abundant contactable functional alkaline sites. On the basis of this, a series of thin two-dimensional MWW zeolite nanocrystalline layers with good dispersion and interpenetrating graded pore structure were synthesized by adjusting the content of hydrogen peroxide in the synthesis system on the premise of maintaining the high dispersion and structural integrity of the thin MWW zeolite nanocrystalline layer.At the same time, it can also efficiently remove organic templates and construct acidic sites through hydrogen peroxide, further increase the openness of the skeleton structure, and reflect the characteristics of high efficiency, environmental protection and multi-function.

2.2.2 Strut

In order to maintain the ordered mesoporous structure of multilayer MFI zeolite, it is usually necessary to support the zeolite lamellae. At present, the commonly used pillared method is to disperse two-dimensional zeolite in alkoxide liquid after expanding the interlayer space in the swelling process, and then hydrolyze the alkoxide in alkaline aqueous solution to form inorganic oxide pillars, which are finally inserted into the pillared precursor[25]. Two-dimensional zeolite can increase the surface area and acid sites by layering, while pillared can increase the distance between layers and further improve the accessibility of external acid sites. Meanwhile, the pillared treatment before calcination significantly increased the total specific surface area and total pore volume of the zeolite[71]. However, the total pore volume of the Al-rich sample is slightly lower due to the penetration of TEOS between the layers. By interlayer silanization using silane monomer in acidic medium, two additional silicon can be inserted in the interlayer pore, thus enlarging the pore size.

2.2.2.1 Gas phase pillaring

Wei et al. Used vapor phase pillared (VPP) process, using alkoxide in the intercalation process, and only a small amount of water was added in the hydrolysis process, with an efficiency of nearly 100%[25]. In this process, the product does not need to be separated, so there is almost no waste liquid produced, and only three discrete operations are needed: TEOS intercalation, TEOS hydrolysis, and calcination. The specific process is shown in Figure 7A. A glass vial filled with layered zeolite was inserted into a Teflon-lined autoclave containing TEOS at the bottom. After heat treatment, the glass vial containing the sample was transferred to another Teflon-lined autoclave with an appropriate amount of water at the bottom. After heat treatment again, MFI zeolite can be obtained by calcination. In some cases, the amount of water used in the hydrolysis process can be reduced to zero. Since the porous zeolite absorbs water, the water molecules dried by hydrothermal crystallization can be used for hydrolysis, while the alkali ions trapped in the MFI zeolite and bis-quaternary ammonium salt template molecules provide sufficient alkalinity for hydrolysis, which is very close to the amount of water required for complete hydrolysis during intercalation. Therefore, Wei et al. Designed a one-step experimental structure, as shown in Figure 7B[25]. Zeolite was placed in the bulb zone and TEOS was placed at the bottom of the U-tube. Through this device, a one-time operation can be achieved without further separation and recovery of the product.
图7 三步离散操作(a)和一次性操作(b)条件下二维沸石气相柱撑(VPP)实验示意图[25]

Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of two-dimensional zeolite vapor phase column (VPP) experiment under three-step discrete operation (a) or one-time operation conditions (b)[25] Copyright © 2019, American Chemical Society

2.2.2.2 Liquid phase pillared method

The pillared method is also applicable to other framework-structured zeolites, such as the MWW-type topology[72]. Kim et al. Used Ti-MCM-22 with MWW topology as the raw material for expansion, in which cetyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (CTMACl) was added[73]. A mixture composed of a molar ratio of 1 Ti-MCM-22 (P): 4 CTMACl: 1.2 TPAOH was reflux-expanded and then mixed with TEOS at a weight ratio of 1:5 for pillared. The expansion process increases the interlayer distance, providing mesoporous regions for pillared (Fig. 8). On this basis, P Přech et al. Synthesized layered TS-1 zeolite with C18H37-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-C6H13( as C18-6-6) as the structure-directing agent[74]. In order to increase the interlayer void volume, layered pillared TS-1 catalyst was synthesized by using pure TEOS or the mixture of TEOS and tetrabutyl titanate (TOBT) as the column medium. The interlayer space of TS-1 zeolite treated by interlayer pillared is larger, and the existence of interlayer silica column also increases the specific surface area of zeolite. However, the use of TEOS as a pillared agent dilutes the active sites of the TS-1 zeolite catalyst. At the same time, excessive use of TEOS will also lead to the coverage of amorphous silica on the TS-1 zeolite layer, thus affecting the catalytic performance of zeolite. By adding a mixture of TEOS and TBOT, the disadvantage of active phase dilution can be overcome by increasing the titanium content in the material. However, the addition of titanium species makes the surface area of TS-1 columnar structure smaller than that of pure TEOS columnar structure, and the resulting product lacks long-distance ordered layered structure.
图8 MCM-22(P)柱撑工艺[72]

Fig. 8 Illustration showing the reversible swelling of MCM-22(P) and pillaring of the swollen material[72]. Copyright © 2008, American Chemical Society

Liu et al. Synthesized MFI zeolite nanosheets using C6H13-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-C10H21(C6-6-10) as a template, and synthesized titanosilicate columnar MFI zeolite nanosheets by interlayer columnar infiltration using TEOS and TBOT mixed solution[75]. The micropore/mesopore ratio of the zeolite can be balanced by optimizing the molar ratio of TEOS/TBOT. Wu et al. Synthesized layered TS-1 molecular sieves by using quaternary ammonium bromide C22-6-6 as a template and 1,6-hexanediamine (C6DN) as a base donor[76]. In order to maintain the long-range ordered structure of TS-1 nanosheets, they used TEOS to prepare layered TS-1 zeolite, and then hydrolyzed TEOS to form silica columns to synthesize columnar TS-1 zeolite, which still maintained a good layered structure after calcination.
The layered inorganic zeolite framework synthesized by using C22-6-6 as a surfactant has good thermal and structural stability. Liu et al. First synthesized an organic columnar MFI molecular sieve by inserting 1,4-bis (triethoxysilyl) benzene (BTEB) as a pillar between multilayer MFI layers[77]. Organic columns offer greater flexibility and specific functionality, overcoming the limitations of a single material. The method of template removal is not by traditional calcination, but by acid extraction and ultraviolet irradiation, which can prevent the condensation of silicon groups between adjacent layers, so that BTEB molecules can react with silicon groups continuously during intercalation to form organic columnar structures. Then the sample was ammoniated, and the amino group was introduced into the organic column, so that the MFI zeolite had the acid center of the framework aluminum and the amino center of the BTEB column, and the organic column MFI zeolite had the dual function of cascade catalysis.
At present, there are some problems in the operation of column support, such as complex steps and low efficiency. Through the formation of 2D zeolite with self-pillared structure (see Section 2.1.2 for details), the collapse problem during calcination can be effectively solved, and the mesoporous properties of 2D zeolite can be improved through the dense stacking between layers.
To sum up, the two major methods (Bottom-up and Top-down) for the synthesis of two-dimensional layered zeolites complement each other and complement each other. Bottom-up synthesis has the characteristics of simple process and avoiding complex post-treatment, but the structure-directing agent used may have the disadvantages of high cost and pollution, and the synthesis usually has strong non-directivity, even if the structure-directing agent is specially designed, its principle needs to be analyzed by trial and error. Top-down synthesis is the conversion of three-dimensional zeolite structure into two-dimensional zeolite, which is usually known as the lamellar structure, so it can obtain the target lamellar more accurately, but the post-treatment operation is complicated, the method is complex, and the preparation process is time-consuming. The two kinds of synthesis methods complement each other, which improves the synthesis path of two-dimensional zeolite and provides researchers with suitable synthesis ideas.

3 Application of two-dimensional layered zeolites

3.1 Catalyze

3.1.1 Epoxidation

TS-1 is the preferred catalyst for the epoxidation of C = C double bond with hydrogen peroxide, which not only has good catalytic performance, but also is a new type of green catalyst. TS-1 has a pore size of 5.55 Å and has high epoxidation activity for small molecular olefins such as propylene, 1-hexene and cyclopentene, but it is difficult for the bulky olefin reactant like terpene to enter the pore and contact the active site in the pore, which is a major challenge for epoxidation[78,79]. Compared with traditional three-dimensional zeolites, two-dimensional layered zeolites have higher specific surface area and shorter diffusion distance, which makes it possible to overcome diffusion limitation.
Na et al. Synthesized TS-1 disordered nanosheets with a mesoporous diameter of 6.3 nm by using bis-quaternary ammonium surfactant [C16H33-N+(CH3)2-zC6H12-N+(CH3)2-C6H13](OH)2(C16-6-6(OH)2) as a structure-directing agent[80]. Compared with the traditional TS-1, the Ti sites on the outer surface of the nanosheets showed high activity. In the epoxidation of cyclohexene and cyclooctene, the conversion of cyclooctene was high (15.3% for TS-1 nanosheets and 0.6% for conventional TS-1 after 60 ° C and 2 H). In the epoxidation of 1-hexene, the catalytic performance of TS-1 nanosheets before and after fluorination was lower than that of traditional bulk microporous TS-1 zeolite, indicating that the catalytic activity of external Ti sites was lower than that of internal Ti sites. Wang et al. Synthesized multilayer TS-1 nanosheets (LTS-1) with C22-6-6(OH)2 replacing C16-6-6(OH)2 as a structure-directing agent[81]. In the epoxidation reaction, the mesoporous nature and ultrathin crystal structure of LTS-1 make its catalytic activity much higher than that of microporous TS-1, Ti-Beta, Ti-MWW, and comparable to that of mesoporous Ti-MCM-41.
On this basis, P Přech et al. Synthesized layered TS-1 zeolite using C18-6-6(OH)2 as a structure-directing agent[74]. Layered TS-1 zeolite was intercalated with a mixture of TEOS and TBOT as the supporting medium. In the epoxidation of cyclooctene, the catalytic performance of the titanium-containing columnar TS-1 catalyst (16.9% yield) was higher than that of the titanium-free columnar TS-1 catalyst (3.5% yield). However, the addition of titanium species makes the surface area of TS-1 columnar structure smaller than that of pure TEOS columnar structure, and the resulting product lacks long-range ordered layered structure. Wilde et al. Prepared the same layered TS-1 as Na et al., and used pure silica or a silica/titania mixture to support the layered TS-1[82]. In the epoxidation of methyl oleate, the presence of octahedrally coordinated Ti in the SiO2-TiO2 column would lead to the failure of decomposition of H2O2, resulting in higher catalytic performance of layered TS-1 and columnar TS-1 containing SiO2. In the epoxidation of high molecular weight substrates with H2O2, tetrahedrally coordinated Ti centers are more important than partial porosity for obtaining high activity and selectivity. In addition, due to the continuous reaction of epoxy compounds, the oligomers formed will block the active center, resulting in catalyst deactivation. Columnar TS-1 and conventional microporous TS-1 can be regenerated by roasting, while layered TS-1 can cause partial interlayer collapse during roasting, so the reproducibility of layered TS-1 is poor.
In order to maintain the long-range ordered structure of TS-1 nanosheets, Wu et al. Synthesized columnar TS-1 zeolite by TEOS pillared method using quaternary ammonium bromide salt C22-6-6 as a template and C6DN as a precursor to provide basicity[76]. Phenol hydroxylation and cyclooctene epoxidation reactions were performed on conventional TS-1 (C-TS-1), layered TS-1 (M-TS1), and columnar TS-1 (P-TS-1). The conversion of phenol increased with reaction time over P-TS-1 and M-TS-1 zeolite catalysts. Due to the low concentration of Ti sites in P-TS-1 zeolite, the phenol conversion of C-TS-1 and M-TS-1 was higher. In the epoxidation of cyclooctene in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, the conversion of P-TS-1 zeolite was much higher than that of M-TS-1 and C-TS-1 zeolite due to the limitation of the outer surface. P-TS-1 has the advantages of uniform mesoporous structure and long-range ordered structure, which has more significant advantages in promoting macromolecular reactions. When the epoxide is formed, it is easier to diffuse from the outer surface into the uniform mesopores, thus inhibiting the possibility of epoxide ring opening and improving the epoxide selectivity.
Layered TS-1 nanosheets (HTS-1) with good interlayer stability and unique house-of-cards-like structure were synthesized by using Bola type surfactant BCPh-12-6-6 as structure-directing agent[12]. Because HTS-1 has mesopores on the external surface and a larger external surface area, its titanium active sites are more accessible to the macromolecular reactants during the epoxidation of macrocyclic olefins (cyclohexene and cyclooctene) than the traditional monomicroporous TS-1 (CTS-1) catalyst and the microporous TS-1 (MTS-1) synthesized directly from a commercial organosilane surfactant (TPOAC). Wang et al. Prepared layered TS-1 (LTS-1) with stable interlayer mesopores by one-pot method using Bola-type surfactant BCPh-12-6-6 and TPAOH as dual templates[46]. The dual-template synthesized LTS-1 has a highly extended structure, which makes it easier to obtain a high-performance titanium active site dominated by TiO6 species. In cyclooctene epoxidation, LTS-1 showed better performance than TS-1 with BCPh-12-6-6 as a single template for directional demixing. The LTS-1 sample synthesized by the dual-template method showed high TiO6 content and good catalytic performance for the epoxidation of cyclooctene.

3.1.2 Alkylation reaction

Liu et al. Used a hydrothermal method to synthesize hierarchical ZSM-5 nanosheets (Hi-ZSM-5) with intracrystalline mesopores and honeycomb structure[83]. The catalytic performance of Hi-ZSM-5 was better than that of C-ZSM-5 in the alkylation of toluene with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene. This is due to the fact that the layered structure increases the acid site concentration and enhances the alkylation efficiency and diffusion rate of toluene. In addition, Hi-ZSM-5 has a low carbon deposition rate and a long catalytic lifetime because it combines the characteristics of mesoporous and layered crystal structures, which facilitates the transport of coke precursors from the zeolite.
Bian et al. Synthesized ZSM-5 nanosheet single crystals with a thickness of 100 nm by the seeded orientation method[84]. During the alkylation of benzene and ethylene, the layered ZSM-5 nanosheets with a b-axis thickness of 100 nm exhibited an ethyl selectivity of 94. 8%, a stable benzene conversion of 44. 0%, and a significant deactivation of the large particle ZSM-5 catalyst. Wei et al. Synthesized a pillared layered MFI molecular sieve by VPP process[25]. Compared with the two-dimensional layered zeolite without pillared treatment, the columnar zeolite prepared by VPP method not only retains the layered structure of zeolite, but also retains the acidity of zeolite, and also improves the catalytic effect of trimethylbenzene alkylation with benzyl alcohol. Naranov et al. Synthesized a layered MFI zeolite with mesoporous structure by using surfactant C22-6-6 as structure-directing agent, zeolite seed and a small amount of perchloric acid as promoter[85]. MFI nanosheets exhibited very high catalytic activity for toluene alkylation compared to conventional ZSM-5 zeolite. Traditional ZSM-5 has only intracrystalline micropores, which is not suitable for acid-catalyzed processes of macromolecules, so its selectivity for most products is low (3%).

3.1.3 Isomerization reaction

Tian et al. Synthesized two kinds of ZSM-5 pillared nanosheets by dual-template method (DZN-2) and TEOS pillared method (PZN-2)[86]. The dual-template method (DZN-2) retained more mesopores and had better channel connectivity than the TEOS method (PZN-2). Compared with layered and massive MFI zeolites, columnar MFI zeolites have more mesopores, which is beneficial to the rapid diffusion of light olefins in the catalytic cracking of n-decane. It can also effectively inhibit secondary reactions such as hydrogen transfer and oligomerization, and has high selectivity for light olefins. Compared with PZN-2 and parent ZN-2 catalyst, DZN-2 catalyst showed the highest selectivity to low olefins at 500 ℃, reaching 37.8%, and the conversion of n-decane was about 92%. The low olefin selectivity of PZN-2 catalyst prepared by TEOS column (28.2%) is higher than that of ZN-2 catalyst (21.2%), but the conversion is lower due to the introduction of Si column which reduces the Brønsted acidity of PZN-2.

3.1.4 Methanol to hydrocarbon

Zhang et al. Used solid silica and dense gel at 373 K by adding ammonium fluoride, using fluoride ions instead of hydroxide ions as mineralizer, and tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr) as a single template[87]. The dissolution of solid silica is promoted by highly electronegative fluoride ions in neutral fluoride medium. ZSM-5 zeolite nanosheets with a rich mesoporous structure were synthesized using ion-pair (F-TPA+) as a structure-directing agent. It has higher surface area and pore volume. Compared with the traditional ZSM-5 zeolite, the ZSM-5 layered zeolite has higher propylene and butene selectivity in the methanol to propylene reaction. In addition, ZSM-5 layered zeolite can inhibit the deposition of coke and prolong the service life of the catalyst.
Feng et al. Prepared ZSM-5 zeolite with hexagonal lamellar structure and low acid content by a relatively simple hydrothermal crystallization method using TPAOH as template and glucose as additive, and the thickness of b-axis orientation was 220 nm[88]. At the same time, the acid content and acid strength of b-oriented ZSM-5 zeolite were further reduced by phosphorus modification with ammonium phosphate as modifier. Compared with conventional ZSM-5, multilayer ZSM-5 has shorter b-axis mass transfer distance, abundant multistage pore structure and suitable surface acidity, and has higher propylene selectivity, longer catalyst life and excellent coke resistance for methanol to olefins reaction.
Although the use of additives can alleviate the cost pressure of template, it also inhibits the growth of crystals in other directions, resulting in small crystal particles and complex separation problems. Meng et al. Proposed a new method for the synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite by dual-template method[89]. ZSM-5 nanoflake zeolite was synthesized using diethylamine (DEA) and inexpensive quaternary ammonium salt surfactant C16H33-[N+-methylpiperidine](C16MP) as mesoporous agents. In the methanol to olefins reaction, its catalytic performance is similar to that of the zeolite nanocrystal layer catalyst synthesized with the expensive bis-quaternary ammonium salt template. ZSM-5 zeolite is highly mesoporous and crystalline, and its microporous space, a small amount of silica groups, and the efficient utilization of Brønsted acid sites on the outer surface all increase the lifetime of the zeolite.
Chen et al. Used a simple and low-cost method to synthesize ZSM-5 zeolite nanosheets, and further shortened the synthesis time to 4 d[90]. They used the traditional surfactant CTAB as the template, replaced the organic quaternary ammonium salt template TPAOH with ZSM-5 seeds, and added ZSM-5 seeds to the synthetic gel to guide the formation of ZSM-5 structure. This method effectively avoided the phase separation caused by CTAB competition, and prepared ZSM-5 zeolite nanosheets with large specific surface area, large mesopore volume and narrow intercrystalline mesopores. Layered ZSM-5 exhibits higher stability and propylene selectivity than conventional microporous ZSM-5 in methanol to propylene reaction.
To sum up, two-dimensional zeolite is more conducive to substrate contact with active sites because of its larger specific surface area, more exposed acidic sites and smaller mass transfer resistance.The diffusion efficiency of the product is improved, the carbon deposition rate is reduced, the selectivity of the product is improved, and the catalytic life is prolonged, so the two-dimensional zeolite can play a great advantage in the field of catalysis.

3.2 Adsorption

Zeolite is a promising candidate for pollutant adsorption because of its high specific surface area, ion exchange properties, shape selectivity, and good thermal and chemical stability[91]. However, the traditional MFI molecular sieve has small micropore size and long diffusion path, which limits the migration of adsorbed molecules in zeolite[92]. The adsorption properties of molecular sieves can be improved by enlarging the pores or shortening the diffusion length. Therefore, MFI molecular sieve nanosheets with ultrathin layered structure and hierarchical micro/mesopores are expected to be applied in the field of adsorption.
Ji et al. Used surfactant C22-6-6 as a structure-directing agent to synthesize ZSM-5 nanosheets with extremely thin petaloid shapes[92]. In the adsorption test of methylene blue (MB), it was found that the nanosheet ZSM-5 zeolite with excellent structural properties had better adsorption performance for MB, and its maximum adsorption capacity was 476. 19 mg/G, which was much higher than that of conventional ZSM-5 zeolite (105. 82 mg/G).
Kim et al. Synthesized MFI nanosheets with excellent p-xylene adsorption by using surfactant [C18H37-N+(CH3)2-C6H12-N+(CH3)2-C4H9][Br]2(C18-6-4) as MFI structure-directing agent[93]. Compared with the traditional massive MFI zeolite, the layered MFI zeolite nanosheets have shorter diffusion path, higher specific surface area, and mesopores between layers, which make it easier for p-xylene to enter the zeolite pores, and the dynamic adsorption capacity reaches 170 mg/G.
Chang et al. Synthesized orthogonal superposed MFI zeolite nanosheets using a novel three-block structure-directing agent, N3-POn-N3[94]. Compared with the traditional bulk ZSM-5 zeolite, the layered ZSM-5 zeolite has a higher adsorption capacity for Pd2+, which is 3 to 4 times higher than that of the bulk ZSM-5. Schnell et al. Used the template C22-6-6 as a structure-directing agent to synthesize mutually orthogonal MFI nanosheets for the adsorption of argon[95]. Interangular overlap can produce favorable adsorption sites, such as capillary condensation between zeolite nanosheets and condensation of silanols on the outer surface, which can increase the adsorption of argon.

3.3 Separation membrane

Gas separation membrane technology is a cost-effective gas removal and capture technology. The traditional gas separation membrane is generally polymer membrane, because it has the advantages of easy processing and low cost. But polymers that exhibit high permeability to gases have poor selectivity, and vice versa[96]. To overcome the limitations of polymer membranes, a common strategy employed by researchers is to incorporate fillers into the polymer matrix to produce Mixed matrix membrane (MMM). In which the polymer is the continuous phase and the filler is the dispersed phase to enhance membrane performance for gas separation applications[97].

3.3.1 Two-dimensional zeolite packing

MMM composed of layered structured packing with high aspect ratio, perpendicular to the diffusion path of gas through the polymer matrix, has high gas separation performance. Two-dimensional zeolites are considered to be an emerging material due to their barrier properties, and have therefore been extensively studied as fillers for MMMs in gas separation applications.
Two-dimensional zeolite not only has the high aspect ratio of oriented growth zeolite, but also has a short diffusion path for selective separation of chemical components[98]. Cao et al. Successfully prepared layered ultrathin ZSM-5 zeolite by seeded secondary growth method for pervaporation desalination[99]. They successfully achieved high salt rejection (up to 24% NaCl content) with porous alumina-supported ZSM-5 zeolite membranes, and observed that the lateral size of zeolite nanosheets increased with the time of seed secondary growth during the synthesis. The lateral size of zeolite nanosheets increased from an average of 2. 15 μm at 3 d to an average of 2. 75 μm at 4 d, while the thickness did not change significantly. The large aspect ratio of zeolite nanosheets in the laminated film significantly reduces the intergranular (i.e., internanosheet) boundary openings in the surface and significantly lengthens the internanosheet channels to minimize the penetration of liquid brine into the permeate-side surface.
Min et al. Prepared 2D M FI zeolite nanosheets on porous α-alumina support for butane isomer separation[100]. It was found that the nanosheet suspension concentration affected the thickness of the 2D MFI zeolite nanosheet coating on the α-alumina support, thereby affecting the n-butane permeability. The increase in the thickness of the 2D MFI nanosheets brings additional resistance to the passage of n-butane through the membrane. Although the films prepared after the primary growth had no obvious cracks or defects, the films did not show significant selectivity for n-butane/isobutane isomer separation due to the presence of voids between the grown nanosheets. In order to enhance the molecular sieving mechanism and cover the voids of the two-dimensional zeolite nanosheets after the primary seed growth, they used the hydrothermal method for secondary growth and tertiary growth, and the resulting membrane had good separation performance of n-butane/isobutane isomers, with a separation factor of 42 and a n-butane Permeance of 382 GPU. Compared with the primary seeded two-dimensional zeolite nanosheets, the secondary and tertiary grown nanosheets showed a greatly reduced n-butane permeability and a significantly improved separation factor, which may be due to the selective separation of isomers by the molecular sieving mechanism. Gou et al. Used 2D MFI zeolite to prepare polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/2D MFI zeolite nanosheet MMM for n-butane/isobutane isomer separation applications[52]. In their study, the permeability and selectivity of n-butane/isobutane isomers were improved simultaneously. PDMS intercalated with 1 wt% 2D MFI zeolite has an n-butane permeability of 15 615 barrer and an n-butane/isobutane separation factor of 15.6, which are 541% and 524% higher, respectively. The 2D MFI nanosheets formed tortuous paths in the PDMS polymer matrix. In addition, the MFI membrane is selective for n-butane[101]. The two-dimensional MFI nanosheets contain 10-ring channels along the b-axis, which facilitate the transport of n-butane on the PDMS polymer matrix. At the same time, isobutane passes through the MMM along the tortuous path formed by the zeolite nanosheets in the polymer matrix. This resulted in a significant increase in the permeability of n-butane and only a slight increase in the isobutane permeability. In addition, the continuous phase of PDMS fills the gap between the two-dimensional MFI nanosheets, effectively improving the separation factor of n-butane/isobutane. Kim et al. Used C22-6-6 as a template to grow layered (2D) MFI sheets on the surface of bulk MFI crystals[102]. The structure and morphology of this material is referred to as "block-MFI-layer-MFI" (BMLM) material, which, in combination with polyimide, enables fabrication of composite membranes with enhanced CO2 permeability and good selectivity for CO2/CH4 gas separation. Fig. 9a shows the morphology of pure MFI particles, and Fig. 9b ~ e shows the morphology of BMLM structure growing on the surface of MFI particles. Recently, Wang's group successfully prepared a two-dimensional zeolite LTA material with a thickness of only 1. 38 nm by template method using kaolin as raw material for CO2 capture[103]. Microscopic characterization showed that the conventional cubic structure of zeolite LTA was transformed into a two-dimensional sheet structure, and the specific surface area was also increased. In addition, in the comparative experiments of CO2 separation at different temperatures, the two-dimensional sheet structure with larger specific surface area can capture more CO2 than the traditional three-dimensional zeolite, and its CO2/CH4 selectivity is 76.78.
图9 (a)纯MFI微粒与(b~e)BMLM粒子在不同水浓度合成条件下的SEM图像[102]

Fig. 9 SEM images of (a) 10 μm bare MFI and (b~e) BMLM particles at varying water concentrations in the synthesis [102]. Copyright © 2012, American Chemical Society

Recently, Azizi et al. Used molecular dynamics to simulate the CH4/N2 separation of MFI molecular sieve nanocrystal layers with dimensions of 38 38 Å × 38 Å × 20 Å and pore size of 4.44 Å[104]. Their simulations showed that the MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer is highly selective for N2 molecules compared to CH4 molecules. The MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer exhibits stronger van der Waals interactions with the CH4 molecules than the N2 molecules. Due to this interaction, the N2 molecule can smoothly pass through the MFI nanosheet, while the CH4 is either trapped in the pore of the MFI nanosheet or unable to pass through it. When the system is simulated at high temperature and high pressure, a small amount of CH4 molecules can also permeate through the MFI nanosheets due to the increase of transmembrane driving force, which overcomes the van der Waals interaction between CH4 molecules and the pores of MFI nanosheets. MFI molecular sieves, which can be exfoliated into nanosheets, exhibit good separation performance in pervaporation desalination and can separate n-butane/isobutane isomers by molecular sieving mechanism, and also have high potential in CO2 gas separation applications.

3.3.2 Comparison of traditional zeolite and two-dimensional zeolite filler

The nanosheet structure shows good barrier performance, which can improve the selectivity of the separated gas. Wolf et al. Concluded in their review that layered nanoparticles are more effective than isodimensional or elongated nanoparticles in reducing relative permeability[105]. However, the effect of adding layered nanoparticles cannot be easily anticipated due to other factors, which may disturb the curvature of the modification, adsorbability, polymer matrix-modified chains, generation of interfacial phases, voids and cracks, etc., leading to the unexpected behavior of MMM. In addition, no general pattern has been observed on selective transport for gas separation applications and it is difficult to predict.
To sum up, the advantage of traditional zeolite is that the porous interconnected structure of zeolite increases the diffusion coefficient of gas molecules through the membrane; Some zeolites (e.g., SAPO-34) have very small pores that can distinguish CO2 from other larger gas molecules by molecular sieving. However, the shortcomings of traditional zeolite can not be ignored. If there is interfacial incompatibility between the polymer matrix and the filler, the pores of the zeolite filler will be blocked, resulting in reduced permeability; The difference of physical properties between zeolite and polymer coating solution may lead to the precipitation of zeolite and the formation of non-selective channels by the migration of particles to the surface, which affects the gas selectivity.
Two-dimensional zeolites have an extremely high aspect ratio compared to typical conventional zeolites; And that nano-sheet fill has a blocking characteristic, so that larger gas molecule can be limited to move through a tortuous path formed by the nano-sheets, and the require small gas molecules are allowed to rapidly diffuse; In addition, two-dimensional zeolites have great potential in the field of separation membranes because of their good film-forming characteristics; Recent research on various two-dimensional materials is developing rapidly. Of course, there are still many challenges in the application of two-dimensional zeolite in separation membranes, such as controlling the ideal orientation of nanocrystalline layers in MMM, disturbing the polymer matrix, etc; In addition, some nanocrystalline layers (such as MFI zeolite nanocrystalline layer) require long time and complex process to synthesize, making the commercialization progress slow.

4 Summary and Prospect

The practical significance of layered zeolites is that they greatly expand the innovation potential: standard three-dimensional zeolites have a rigid, immutable structure, but as layered materials, they can be easily modified into new structures, topologically functionalized, and transformed into compact composites.
At present, the synthetic strategies for the development of layered zeolites are mainly bottom-up and top-down strategies, in which structure-directing agents or templates are usually used in bottom-up synthesis, and in recent years, the design of structure-directing agents with special structures has also been reported. However, most of the reagents used above are expensive, and they are usually quaternary ammonium salts and other substances, which have a great impact on the environment, so it is urgent to develop green and low-cost structure-directing agents or templates. In addition, the current bottom-up synthesis still has a strong non-directionality, and the design and development of new special structure-directing agents or templates for the directional synthesis of two-dimensional zeolites will be an important development trend in the future.
Top-down post-treatment modification includes swelling, exfoliation, pillared and other modification processes, which are complex in operation, complex in methods and long in preparation cycle, and are often treated in strong alkaline environment. Therefore, the development of simple, efficient and mild post-treatment paths is an important direction for the subsequent top-down synthesis of two-dimensional zeolites.
All the existing three-dimensional zeolites may have their corresponding two-dimensional layered precursors, and it is speculated that more new layered zeolites will be developed and prepared. Zeolite layers are typically less than a few nanometers thick, and the transition between two and three dimensions may become increasingly blurred and produce a continuous layer thickness. An extended concept of "secondary zeolite structure" can also be proposed, such as various layer arrangements and composites, non-zeolite, and even amorphous components, as auxiliary zeolite layers. In addition to increasing the total surface area or mesopore volume to provide high accessibility of active sites, for the same topology (such as MFI or MWW), two-dimensional zeolites can also produce layer-assembled structures, whose structural characteristics and catalytic behavior may be changed accordingly.
Zeolite is mainly used in catalysis, adsorption and separation. With the gradual development of two-dimensional zeolites, their extremely short diffusion path, huge external surface area, hierarchical pore system and film-forming characteristics of layered zeolites have attracted great attention in the field of gas separation membranes. In addition, through the film-forming characteristics, active sites and microenvironment modulation of the two-dimensional zeolite crystal layer, the layered zeolite, as an assembly element of the two-dimensional membrane, is expected to embody the new characteristics of the "two-dimensional nanocrystalline layer microreactor" in the multi-step cascade reaction urgently needed by the biomass fine chemical industry through the microchannel assembly.
With the increasingly prominent energy and environmental issues, the directional cracking and reuse of waste polymers, as well as the efficient directional conversion of biomass resources, have become an important research direction in the field of catalysis. In the face of macromolecules such as biomass, plastics and other substances, the larger surface area of two-dimensional zeolite can greatly improve the exposure and accessibility of active sites, and the shorter diffusion path can remove product molecules in time.The secondary reaction after substrate conversion is avoided, and the flexible structure endows the zeolite with better modification and assembly capability, so that the characteristics of the'phase transfer catalyst-like 'of the reversible polymerization and redispersion of the two-dimensional zeolite can be realized. With the heavy oil and the intervention of new carbon-containing raw materials such as biomass, as well as the demand of fine organic chemical industry, more and more catalytic reactions need to be carried out in the liquid phase.Even in some reactions, it is necessary to add highly dispersed nanocatalysts to larger substrates for "reverse" liquid-solid catalytic reactions, thus forming a new concept of "pseudo-homogeneous catalytic reaction". In addition, the ordered installation of active sites with different sizes and morphologies can be realized by further developing the secondary treatment means in the liquid phase system and using the effective method of installing active sites in layered zeolite for reference, taking advantage of the accessibility of zeolite two-dimensional crystal layer and macromolecules, the high adjustability of interfacial silanol array and active sites.Organic groups are grafted to adjust the microenvironment or construct special regional molecular fences and diffusion channels to meet the coupling requirements of reactant cascade reactions, which is expected to achieve directional catalytic conversion in complex reaction networks of macromolecules such as heavy oil or biomass, and to achieve the goal of integration of multi-step cascade reactions. It can be seen that two-dimensional zeolites have great potential in the field of macromolecular catalytic conversion.
The superior catalytic activity of 2D zeolite-related materials is mainly attributed to the shortened diffusion path, increased external surface area, and more exposed active sites, which are caused by the post-modification changing the original ordered stacking manner in the layered zeolite precursor. Therefore, a revolution in the field of modified layered zeolites has also occurred to propose easier and milder processes. Applications related to two-dimensional zeolites remain to be explored in more fields.
[1]
Čejka J, Millini R, Opanasenko M, Serrano D P, Roth W J. Catal. Today, 2020, 345: 2.

[2]
Wang J, Fan Y, Jiang J, Wan Z, Pang S, Guan Y, Xu H, He X, Ma Y, Huang A, Wu P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62(25): e202304734.

[3]
Diao D D, Zhang H Y, Wang J G, Xiao Q. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2022, 330: 111629.

[4]
Li C G, Moliner M, Corma A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(47): 15330.

[5]
Přech J, Pizarro P, Serrano D P, Čejka J. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47(22): 8263.

[6]
Heard C J, Čejka J, Opanasenko M, Nachtigall P, Centi G, Perathoner S. Adv. Mater., 2019, 31(3): 1801712.

[7]
Zi W, Zhang J, Jiang J, Qu K, Tao S, Zhang J. Chem. Eur. J., 2023, 29(11): e202202754.

[8]
Xu H, Wu P. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2021, 63(2): 234.

[9]
Shao X, Wang S, Zhang X, Li J, Wang N, Wang Z, Yuan Z. Prog. Chem., 2022, 34(12): 2651.

[10]
Ni X, Ding H, Zhang J, Zeng Z, Bai P, Guo X. Prog. Chem., 2018, 30(7): 976.

[11]
Zhang Y, Che S. Angew. Chem.Int. Edit., 2020, 59(1): 50.

[12]
Li N, Wang M Y, You Q, Bi C Y, Chen H Y, Liu B Y, Sun M, Hao Q Q, Zhang J B, Ma X X. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2020, 10(5): 1323.

[13]
Zhang C N, Lin F, Kong L T, Ye Z Q, Pan D, Li H B, Li H, Liu P, Zhang Y H, Zhang H B, Tang Y. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2022, 9(16): 4030.

[14]
Zhang C N, Huang Y Y, Zhao H B, Zhang H B, Ye Z Q, Liu P, Zhang Y H, Tang Y. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4(10): 10645.

[15]
Chen J Q, Li Y Z, Hao Q Q, Chen H, Liu Z T, Dai C, Zhang J, Ma X, Liu Z W. Natl. Sci. Rev., 2021, 8(7): nwaa236.

[16]
Grzybek J, Roth W J, Gil B, Korzeniowska A, Mazur M, Čejka J, Morris R E. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(13): 7701.

[17]
Xu L, Ji X Y, Jiang J G, Han L, Che S N, Wu P. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27(23): 7852.

[18]
Ramos F S O, de Pietre M K, Pastore H O. RSC Adv., 2013, 3(7): 2084.

[19]
Wang X G, Firdous A, Xu L, Chen P H, Liao F H, Lin J H, Sun J L. Cryst. Growth Des., 2019, 19(4): 2272.

[20]
Bae J N, Cichocka M O, Zhang Y, Bacsik Z, Bals S, Zou X D, Willhammar T, Hong S B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(30): 10230.

[21]
Zhao Z C, Zhang W P, Ren P J, Han X W, Müller U, Yilmaz B, Feyen M, Gies H, Xiao F S, De Vos D, Tatsumi T, Bao X H. Chem. Mater., 2013, 25(6): 840.

[22]
Gil B, Makowski W, Marszalek B, Roth W J, Kubu M, Čejka J, Olejniczak Z. Dalton Trans., 2014, 43(27): 10501.

[23]
Gies H, Feyen M, De Baerdemaeker T, De Vos D E, Yilmaz B, Müller U, Meng X J, Xiao F S, Zhang W P, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T, Bao X H. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2016, 222: 235.

[24]
Bian C Q, Wu Q M, Zhang J, Chen F, Pan S X, Wang L, Meng X J, Müller U, Feyen M, Yilmaz B, Gies H, Zhang W P, Bao X H, De Vos D, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T, Xiao F S. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2015, 214: 204.

[25]
Wei L, Song K C, Wu W, Holdren S, Zhu G H, Shulman E, Shang W J, Chen H Y, Zachariah M R, Liu D X. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(22): 8712.

[26]
Roth W J, Gil B, Mayoral A, Grzybek J, Korzeniowska A, Kubu M, Makowski W, Čejka J, Olejniczak Z, Mazur M. Dalton Trans., 2018, 47(9): 3029.

[27]
De Baerdemaeker T, Feyen M, Vanbergen T, Müller U, Yilmaz B, Xiao F S, Zhang W P, Yokoi T, Bao X H, De Vos D E, Gies H. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27(1): 316.

[28]
Yang Z J, Li Y F, Wu Q B, Ren N, Zhang Y H, Liu Z P, Tang Y. J. Catal., 2011, 280(2): 247.

[29]
Corma A, Fornes V, Pergher S B, Maesen T L M, Buglass J G. Nature, 1998, 396(6709): 353.

[30]
Jeon M Y, Kim D, Kumar P, Lee P S, Rangnekar N, Bai P, Shete M, Elyassi B, Lee H S, Narasimharao K, Basahel S N, Al-Thabaiti S, Xu W Q, Cho H J, Fetisov E O, Thyagarajan R, DeJaco R F, Fan W, Mkhoyan K A, Siepmann J I, Tsapatsis M. Nature, 2017, 543(7647): 690.

[31]
Liu Y. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. Chin., 2021, 42(1): 117.

[32]
Margarit V J, Martínez-Armero M E, Navarro M T, Martínez C, Corma A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54(46): 13724.

[33]
Luo H Y, Michaelis V K, Hodges S, Griffin R G, Román-Leshkov Y. Chem. Sci., 2015, 6(11): 6320.

[34]
Choi M, Na K, Kim J, Sakamoto Y, Terasaki O, Ryoo R. Nature, 2009, 461(7261): 246.

[35]
Jin S Q, Tao G J, Zhang S L, Luo Y, Fu W H, Wang Z D, Gao H X, Sun H M, Yang W M. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8(23): 6076.

[36]
Wang Z D, Cichocka M O, Luo Y, Zhang B, Sun H M, Tang Y, Yang W M. Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41(7): 1062.

[37]
Lu K, Huang J, Ren L, Li C, Guan Y J, Hu B W, Xu H, Jiang J G, Ma Y H, Wu P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59(15): 6258.

[38]
Zhou Y W, Mu Y Y, Hsieh M F, Kabius B, Pacheco C, Bator C, Rioux R M, Rimer J D. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(18): 8211.

[39]
Na K, Choi M, Park W, Sakamoto Y, Terasaki O, Ryoo R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132(12): 4169.

[40]
Jo C, Cho K, Kim J, Ryoo R. Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(32): 4175.

[41]
Karwacki L, Stavitski E, Kox M H F, Kornatowski J, Weckhuysen B M. Angew. Chem., 2007, 119(38): 7366.

[42]
Shen X F, Mao W T, Ma Y H, Xu D D, Wu P, Terasaki O, Han L, Che S N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(3): 724.

[43]
Xu D D, Ma Y H, Jing Z F, Han L, Singh B, Feng J, Shen X F, Cao F L, Oleynikov P, Sun H, Terasaki O, Che S N. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 4262.

[44]
Emdadi L, Wu Y Q, Zhu G H, Chang C C, Fan W, Pham T, Lobo R F, Liu D X. Chem. Mater., 2014, 26(3): 1345.

[45]
Huang Y H, Zhang H C, Gao L, Yan T L, Yan Y E, Zhang Y H, Tang Y. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2022, 341: 112110.

[46]
Wang M Y, Wang X, You Q, Wu Y S, Yang X, Chen H Y, Liu B Y, Hao Q Q, Zhang J B, Ma X X. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2021, 323: 111207.

[47]
Varoon Agrawal K, Zhang X Y, Elyassi B, Brewer D D, Gettel M, Kumar S, Lee J A, Maheshwari S, Mittal A, Sung C Y, Cococcioni M, Francis L F, McCormick A V, Mkhoyan K A, Tsapatsis M. Science, 2011, 334(6052): 72.

[48]
Agrawal K V, Topuz B, Jiang Z Y, Nguenkam K, Elyassi B, Francis L F, Tsapatsis M, Navarro M. AlChE. J., 2013, 59(9): 3458.

[49]
Rangnekar N, Shete M, Agrawal K V, Topuz B, Kumar P, Guo Q, Ismail I, Alyoubi A, Basahel S, Narasimharao K, Macosko C W, Mkhoyan K A, Al-Thabaiti S, Stottrup B, Tsapatsis M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54(22): 6571.

[50]
Zhang H, Xiao Q, Guo X H, Li N J, Kumar P, Rangnekar N, Jeon M Y, Al-Thabaiti S, Narasimharao K, Basahel S N, Topuz B, Onorato F J, Macosko C W, Mkhoyan K A, Tsapatsis M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55(25): 7009.

[51]
Sabnis S, Tanna V A, Li C, Zhu J X, Vattipalli V, Nonnenmann S S, Sheng G, Lai Z P, Winter H H, Fan W. Chem. Commun., 2017, 53(52): 7011.

[52]
Gou Y H, Xiao L, Yang Y T, Guo X H, Zhang F M, Zhu W D, Xiao Q. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2021, 315: 110930.

[53]
Ogino I, Nigra M M, Hwang S J, Ha J M, Rea T, Zones S I, Katz A. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133(10): 3288.

[54]
Eilertsen E A, Ogino I, Hwang S J, Rea T, Yeh S, Zones S I, Katz A. Chem. Mater., 2011, 23(24): 5404.

[55]
Ogino I, Eilertsen E A, Hwang S J, Rea T, Xie D, Ouyang X, Zones S I, Katz A. Chem. Mater., 2013, 25(9): 1502.

[56]
Ouyang X, Wanglee Y J, Hwang S J, Xie D, Rea T, Zones S I, Katz A. Dalton Trans., 2014, 43(27): 10417.

[57]
Ouyang X, Hwang S J, Runnebaum R C, Xie D, Wanglee Y J, Rea T, Zones S I, Katz A. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136(4): 1449.

[58]
Okrut A, Aigner M, Schöttle C, Grosso-Giordano N A, Hwang S J, Ouyang X Y, Zones S, Katz A. Dalton Trans., 2018, 47(42): 15082.

[59]
Roth W J, Sasaki T, Wolski K, Song Y J, Tang D M, Ebina Y, Ma R Z, Grzybek J, Kałahurska K, Gil B, Mazur M, Zapotoczny S, Ceka J. Sci. Adv., 2020, 6(12): eaay8163.

[60]
Maluangnont T, Yamauchi Y, Sasaki T, Roth W J, Čejka J, Kubu M. Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(55): 7378.

[61]
Opanasenko M, Shamzhy M, Wang Y Z, Yan W F, Nachtigall P, Čejka J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59(44): 19380.

[62]
Shamzhy M, Opanasenko M, Tian Y Y, Konysheva K, Shvets O, Morris R E, Čejka J. Chem. Mater., 2014, 26(19): 5789.

[63]
Lu K, Huang J, Jiao M C, Zhao Y H, Ma Y, Jiang J G, Xu H, Ma Y H, Wu P. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2021, 310: 110617.

[64]
Kasneryk V, Shamzhy M, Zhou J T, Yue Q D, Mazur M, Mayoral A, Luo Z L, Morris R E, Čejka J, Opanasenko M. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10: 5129.

[65]
Chlubná-Eliášová P, Tian Y Y, Pinar A B, Kubů M, Čejka J, Morris R E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53(27): 7048.

[66]
Kasneryk V, Shamzhy M, Opanasenko M, Wheatley P S, Morris S A, Russell S E, Mayoral A, Trachta M, Čejka J, Morris R E. Angew. Chem., 2017, 129(15): 4388.

[67]
Firth D S, Morris S A, Wheatley P S, Russell S E, Slawin A M Z, Dawson D M, Mayoral A, Opanasenko M, Položij M, Čejka J, Nachtigall P, Morris R E. Chem. Mater., 2017, 29(13): 5605.

[68]
Liu X, Luo Y, Mao W T, Jiang J G, Xu H, Han L, Sun J L, Wu P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59(3): 1166.

[69]
Liu X, Mao W T, Jiang J G, Lu X Q, Peng M M, Xu H, Han L, Che S A, Wu P. Chem., 2019, 25(17): 4520.

[70]
Kang J H, Xie D, Zones S I, Davis M E. Chem. Mater., 2020, 32(5): 2014.

[71]
Machoke A G, Knoke I Y, Lopez-Orozco S, Schmiele M, Selvam T, Marthala V R R, Spiecker E, Unruh T, Hartmann M, Schwieger W. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2014, 190: 324.

[72]
Maheshwari S, Jordan E, Kumar S, Bates F S, Penn R L, Shantz D F, Tsapatsis M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(4): 1507.

[73]
Kim S Y, Ban H J, Ahn W S. Catal. Lett., 2007, 113(3): 160.

[74]
Přech J, Eliášová P, Aldhayan D, Kubů M. Catal. Today, 2015, 243: 134.

[75]
Liu B Y, Mu Q W, Huang J J, Tan W, Xiao J. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 772.

[76]
Wu W, Tran D T, Wu X Y, Oh S C, Wang M Y, Chen H Y, Emdadi L, Zhang J Y, Schulman E, Liu D X. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2019, 278: 414.

[77]
Liu B Y, Wattanaprayoon C, Oh S C, Emdadi L, Liu D X. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27(5): 1479.

[78]
van der Waal J C, Rigutto M S, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 1998, 167(2): 331.

[79]
Eimer G A, Díaz I, Sastre E, Casuscelli S G, Crivello M E, Herrero E R, Perez-Pariente J. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2008, 343(1/2): 77.

[80]
Na K, Jo C, Kim J, Ahn W S, Ryoo R. ACS Catal., 2011, 1(8): 901.

[81]
Wang J G, Xu L, Zhang K, Peng H G, Wu H H, Jiang J G, Liu Y M, Wu P. J. Catal., 2012, 288: 16.

[82]
Wilde N, Přech J, Pelz M, Kubů M, Čejka J, Gläser R. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6(19): 7280.

[83]
Liu M, Jia W Z, Liu X H, Li J H, Zhu Z R. Catal. Lett., 2018, 148: 1396-1406.

[84]
Bian K, Hou Z. J. Chin. Univ., 2019, 40(4): 784.

[85]
Naranov E R, Sadovnikov A A, Vatsouro I M, Maximov A L. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2020, 7(6): 1400.

[86]
Tian Y J, Zhang B F, Liang H R, Hou X, Wang L, Zhang X W, Liu G Z. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2019, 572: 24.

[87]
Zhang L L, Song Y, Li G D, Zhang Q, Zhang S L, Xu J, Deng F, Gong Y J. RSC Adv., 2015, 5(75): 61354.

[88]
Feng R, Yan X L, Hu X Y, Zhang Y X, Wu J J, Yan Z F. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2020, 594: 117464.

[89]
Meng L Q, Zhu X C, Wannapakdee W, Pestman R, Goesten M G, Gao L, van Hoof A J F, Hensen E J M. J. Catal., 2018, 361: 135.

[90]
Chen Y H, Han D M, Zhang Q, Cui H X. J. Porous Mater., 2020, 27(5): 1265.

[91]
Ji Y J, Xu F Y, Wei W, Gao H, Zhang K, Zhang G L, Xu Y Y, Zhang P L. J. Solid State Chem., 2021, 295: 121917.

[92]
van den Bergh J, Ban S, Vlugt T J H, Kapteijn F. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113(52): 21856.

[93]
Kim N S, Numan M, Nam S C, Park S E, Jo C. J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 403: 123659.

[94]
Chang A, Yang T C, Chen M Y, Hsiao H M, Yang C M. J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 400: 123241.

[95]
Schnell S K, Wu L L, Koekkoek A J J, Kjelstrup S, Hensen E J M, Vlugt T J H. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117(46): 24503.

[96]
Robeson L M. J. Membr. Sci., 2008, 320(1/2): 390.

[97]
Zainuddin M I F, Ahmad A L. J. CO2 Util., 2022, 62: 102094.

[98]
Rehman A U, Arepalli D, Alam S F, Kim M Z, Choi J, Cho C H. Nanomaterials, 2021, 11(9): 2327.

[99]
Cao Z S, Zeng S X, Xu Z, Arvanitis A, Yang S W, Gu X H, Dong J H. Sci. Adv., 2018, 4(11): eaau8634.

[100]
Min B, Yang S W, Korde A, Kwon Y H, Jones C W, Nair S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(24): 8201.

[101]
Wang Q, Wu A M, Zhong S L, Wang B, Zhou R F. J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 540: 50.

[102]
Kim W, Zhang X, Lee J S, Tsapatsis M, Nair S. ACS Nano, 2012, 6(11): 9978.

[103]
Shen J, Sun Q, Cao J, Wang P, Jia W L, Wang S Y, Zhao P, Wang Z P. New J. Chem., 2022, 46(14): 6720.

[104]
Azizi B, Vessally E, Ahmadi S, Ebadi A G, Azamat J. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2022, 641: 128527.

[105]
Wolf C, Angellier-Coussy H, Gontard N, Doghieri F, Guillard V. J. Membr. Sci., 2018, 556: 393.

Outlines

/