Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Composite Polymer Electrolytes with Multi-Dimensional Non-Lithium Inorganic Hybird Components for Lithium Batteries

  • Bingyi Ma 1 ,
  • Sheng Huang 2 ,
  • Shuanjin Wang 2 ,
  • Min Xiao 2 ,
  • Dongmei Han , 1, 2, * ,
  • Yuezhong Meng , 1, 2, *
Expand
  • 1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University,Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 2 The Key Lab of Low-Carbon Chemistry & Energy Conservation of Guangdong Province, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275, China
*e-mail: (Dongmei Han);
(Yuezhong Meng)

Professor Dongmei Han received her PhD degree from Sun Yat-sen University in 2008, under the supervision of Professor Yuezhong Meng. She has ever worked one year as a Visiting fellow at University of wollongong, Australia 2008, and two years of a postdoctoral fellow with Professor Peikang Shen in Sun Yat-sen University from 2009 to 2012. Now she is an Associate Professor at Sun Yat-Sen University. Her research interests are focused on new energy materials. In this field, she has authored about 75 publications.

Yuezhong Meng is the Pearl-River Professor at Sun Yat-sen University and the director of the Key Laboratory of Low-carbon Chemistry and Energy Conservation of Guangdong Province. He received B.Sc., M.Sc. and PhD degrees from Dalian University of Technology. He worked at City University of Hong Kong, McGill University, Canada, Nanyang Tech-nological University, Singapore and the National University of Singapore for more than 8 years. He became a "Hundred Talents" member of CAS in 1998. He has published 438 papers in refereed international journals and has 106 U.S. and Chinese patents. His research areas include exploratory functional polymers, chemical utilization of carbon dioxide and new energy materials.

Received date: 2022-10-14

  Revised date: 2023-08-02

  Online published: 2023-08-23

Abstract

The traditional electrolyte is flammable, easy to leak, and toxic, which affects the safety performance of batteries working for a long time. In view of the above problems, recently researchers have focused on the development of (quasi) solid electrolyte. Solid composite electrolyte composed of inorganic fillers and polymer has the advantages of high ionic conductivity and mechanical stability of inorganic electrolyte, flexibility and low interface impedance of polymer electrolyte, which has attracted extensive attention of researchers. Inorganic components mainly include active Li+-containing fillers and inert Li+-free fillers. The inert Li+-free fillers possess the benefits of low cost and easy preparation process, so they have greater potential for large-scale industrial applications. In this paper, the performance requirements of composite polymer electrolytes are reviewed. Starting from non-lithium inorganic hybrid components, we summarize the research on improving the performance of composite polymer electrolyte with inert Li+-free fillers, including zero-dimensional nanoparticles, one-dimensional nanotubes (nanowires, nanorods), two-dimensional boron nitride nanosheets, and three-dimensional structure of fillers. Different dimensions of analysis and thinking aim to shed light on the design and application of inert fillers-polymer electrolytes, and we also look forward to the broad prospects of non-lithium inorganic components in the industrial application of composite electrolyte.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Performance requirements

2.1 High ionic conductivity

2.2 High lithium-ion transference number

2.3 Wide electrochemical stability window

2.4 Mechanical strength

2.5 Thermal and chemical stability

3 Multi-dimensional non-lithium inorganic hybrid component

3.1 Zero-dimensional nanoparticles

3.2 One-dimensional nanostructure

3.3 Two-dimensional nanosheet

3.4 Three-dimensional strucutre

4 Conclusion and outlook

Cite this article

Bingyi Ma , Sheng Huang , Shuanjin Wang , Min Xiao , Dongmei Han , Yuezhong Meng . Composite Polymer Electrolytes with Multi-Dimensional Non-Lithium Inorganic Hybird Components for Lithium Batteries[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2023 , 35(9) : 1327 -1340 . DOI: 10.7536/PC221007

1 Introduction

With the development of economy and society and the increasingly serious global ecological problems, the market demand for low-cost and environmentally friendly energy conversion and storage systems is increasing, so the field of safe and high specific capacity batteries is developing rapidly[1,2]. Lithium metal has the advantages of high theoretical specific capacity (3860 mAh/G), low chemical potential (− 3.04 V vs hydrogen standard electrode), and low density (0.59 g·cm-3), making it an ideal anode material for high-performance lithium metal batteries[3~5]. Lithium-ion batteries have the advantages of light weight, low self-discharge, high energy density, long service life and stable cycle. Their popularity has promoted the wireless revolution of small energy storage devices such as mobile phones, notebook computers and digital cameras, and changed the global communication. With the continuous improvement of lithium battery performance, their applications in transportation systems, power grid storage and residential power supply are becoming more and more extensive[6,7][8]. Liquid organic electrolytes are widely used in lithium batteries because of their high ionic conductivity (10-3~10-2S·cm-1) and excellent wettability, but there are still some problems with organic electrolytes[9]. The traditional electrolyte uses organic solvent as solvent, which is flammable, easy to leak and has low coulombic efficiency. It is difficult to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) between the electrode and the electrolyte, which leads to the rapid decline of battery capacity and the decrease of cycle life[10]. When used in lithium metal batteries, the organic electrolyte will also react adversely with lithium. During the charging and discharging process of the battery, the lithium dendrite formed by the uneven deposition of lithium will pierce the separator, resulting in internal short circuit and thermal runaway of the battery, causing a series of safety problems[11,12]. Lithium dendrites become dead lithium when they lose contact with the electrode after breaking, resulting in a decrease in Coulombic efficiency. Researchers have added additives to the electrolyte to improve the stability of the SEI layer. However, the low solubility of many additives in the electrolyte and their rapid consumption during cycling weaken their effectiveness in inhibiting dendrite growth[13]. In order to inhibit the formation of lithium dendrites and improve the safety and cycle life of lithium batteries, researchers have proposed the use of (quasi) solid-state electrolytes instead of organic electrolytes[14,15]. Solid-state processing uses bipolar electrodes to stack cells in a single package, thereby reducing package volume and increasing energy density[16]. In order to realize the commercial application of solid-state batteries, solid-state electrolytes are required to be low-cost, lightweight, environmentally friendly, able to improve the transport efficiency of ions at the interface, and have good chemical, thermal and mechanical stability after long-term operation[17].
Solid electrolytes include inorganic electrolytes, solid polymer electrolytes, and organic-inorganic composite electrolytes[18]. The inorganic electrolyte has high lithium ionic conductivity (>0.1 mS·cm-1 at room temperature), wide electrochemical window (> 4.0 V), good mechanical properties and thermal stability at room temperature[19]. However, inorganic solid electrolytes also have some problems, such as poor wettability, large interface resistance between electrode and electrolyte, brittle inorganic materials (conductive ceramics/glass), difficult processing, complex manufacturing process, and lithium dendrite growth along grain boundaries at low current density, which limit the application of inorganic electrolytes in lithium batteries[20][21]. Solid polymer electrolyte is a kind of solid ionic conductor formed by dissolving lithium salt in polymer containing Lewis basic atoms. It is light, flexible, easy to process, and has relatively small interface contact resistance, good chemical stability and mechanical properties, but low ionic conductivity at room temperature and narrow electrochemical window[22][23~25][26]. Therefore, researchers have doped inorganic fillers into the polymer matrix to form composite polymer electrolytes, which combine the advantages of inorganic electrolytes and polymer electrolytes to improve the electrochemical performance of composite electrolytes.
Commonly used polymer matrices include polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), poly (vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) and others[27,28][29,30][31][32][33,34][35,36]. It is now generally accepted that ion transport occurs mainly in the amorphous region above the glass transition temperature of the polymer[37]. The ion motion in the electrolyte is combined with the local segmental motion of the host polymer matrix to conduct ions through the segmental relaxation of the polymer chain, for example, polyether conducts lithium ions through the complexation (coordination) of oxygen atoms on the main chain with lithium ions[38]. For most polymer electrolytes, lithium ion migration occurs in the amorphous region of the polymer, and the segmented motion of the chain supports lithium ion migration from one coordination site to a new coordination site on the chain, or from one chain to another under the action of an electric field[39]. Since the first polymer electrolyte system was developed by Michel Armand in the 1970s, PEO and its derivatives have been widely studied as the mainstream system of polymer electrolytes[40,41]. PEO has low cost, strong solvating ability, large dielectric constant, and good compatibility with anode lithium; the ethylene oxide (EO) segment in PEO can interact with cations such as Li+ to promote the dissociation of lithium salt; and the EO segment has good chain flexibility and segmental motion ability, and can conduct Li+ through long-range segmental motion[42~44]. However, PEO is crystalline at room temperature and has weak segmental mobility, resulting in low lithium ion transport efficiency, low ionic conductivity (10-7~10-6S/cm) at room temperature, and small lithium ion transference number (0.2 – 0.4)[45,46]. In order to improve the ionic conductivity, polymer mixing, grafting and copolymerization can be considered to increase the segmental movement of the main chain or optimize the flexibility of the branch chain, and inorganic fillers can also be added to the polymer to construct fast ion conduction channels or single ion conductors can be introduced to restrict the movement of anions[47,48]. The solid-state composite electrolyte based on inorganic filler-polymer matrix has attracted wide attention in recent years. Fig. 1 shows the hot trend of solid-state composite electrolyte in the field of lithium batteries from 2011 to 2021.
图1 2011—2021年锂电池领域固态复合电解质的热度趋势

Fig.1 The research trend of solid composite electrolytes of lithium batteries from 2011 to 2021

The results show that the physical, chemical and electrochemical properties of polymer electrolytes can be improved by doping inorganic fillers. Inorganic fillers include inert lithium-free fillers (such as SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, etc.) and active lithium-containing fillers (such as Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3(LATP) and Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12(LLZTO)). Active filler is a kind of ionic conductor with high ionic conductivity, which can provide lithium source and partially participate in the transport of lithium ions. However, in order to obtain the specific nanostructure of this kind of conductor, its preparation process is complex. Inert filler is a kind of non-ionic conductor, which does not directly participate in ionic conduction. It can reorient adjacent polymer segments, reduce the glass transition temperature and crystallinity of polymers, and increase the amorphous region of polymers[49]. Some fillers also promote the dissociation of lithium salt by Lewis acid-base interaction with lithium salt, and increase the number of free mobile lithium ions. The surface of some inorganic materials rich in oxygen holes is positively charged, which can adsorb the anions of lithium salts (such as TFSI-, ClO 4 -) and improve the lithium ion transfer number. Some functional groups of the filler can coordinate with lithium ions or polymers, weaken the interaction between polymers and ions, and thus reduce the energy barrier of lithium ion migration. In addition, the interface layer formed by the inorganic particle-organic polymer can also be used as a new ionic conduction channel to improve the ionic conductivity. Due to the inherent physical properties of inert ceramic fillers, they also play an important role in improving the thermal stability, wettability, mechanical properties and interfacial stability with electrodes of (quasi) solid electrolytes. Therefore, starting from the non-lithium inorganic hybrid components, this paper summarizes the research on the improvement of the performance of composite polymer electrolytes by different dimensions of inert lithium-free filler structures, aiming to provide a clear guidance for the structural design of inert fillers.

2 Performance requirement

In lithium metal batteries, the solid composite polymer electrolyte acts as both an electrolyte and a separator, forming a sandwich structure with the positive and negative electrodes. To improve the electrochemical performance of solid-state lithium batteries, the composite electrolyte should meet the following requirements. Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of performance requirements of a composite polymer electrolyte.
图2 复合聚合物电解质的性能要求示意图

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of performance requirements for composite polymer electrolytes

2.1 High ionic conductivity

Ionic conductivity is a key characteristic of the electrolyte, which quantifies the degree to which ions are mobile and available for the ongoing electrochemical reaction, and in part determines the power output of the battery[50]. The Li+ is dissolved in the polymer and moves with the movement of the polymer chain segment, and the higher the ionic conductivity is, the better the battery performance is[51]. To achieve an ionic conductivity (10 mS·cm-1) comparable to that of an electrolyte at room temperature, the ionic conductivity can be improved in two ways: improving the ion mobility and increasing the concentration of free ions. Therefore, a good ionic conductor must have a small resistance to the movement of ions and promote the dissociation of ion pairs. Reducing the crystallinity of the polymer increases the ionic conductivity. Ionic conductivity is usually measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

2.2 High lithium ion transference number ($t_{Li}^{+}$)

Although the total current is generated by the movement of anions and cations, the useful current to drive redox reactions is usually generated by the movement of cations, which are lithium ions in lithium batteries. Lithium ion transference number refers to the ratio of the number of mobile lithium ions to the total number of mobile ions in the electrolyte. The larger the $t_{Li}^{+}$ is, the smaller the concentration polarization is, which is beneficial to inhibit the formation of lithium dendrite. The lithium ion transference number is usually obtained from the potentiostatic polarization test and calculation of lithium-lithium symmetrical batteries.

2.3 Wide electrochemical window

The electrochemical window is the difference between the oxidation and reduction potentials. In order to make the battery work stably, the electrolyte can not react with the cathode and anode, that is, it is inert to both electrodes, so the oxidation potential must be higher than the intercalation potential of Li+ in the cathode, and the reduction potential must be lower than the intercalation potential of anode lithium metal. The electrochemical stability of the high voltage cathode in the battery system should be 4. 3 ~ 5.0 V[52]. The electrochemical window of the electrolyte can be achieved by constructing a lithium/polymer electrolyte/stainless steel sheet cell, followed by linear sweep voltammetry at a certain scan rate over a specific potential range.

2.4 Mechanical stability

The manufacturing process of the polymer film and the assembly process of the battery require the (quasi) solid electrolyte to have a certain degree of flexibility. At the same time, because lithium dendrites are produced during the operation of the lithium battery, the polymer film must have a certain strength to inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites, prevent short circuit within the battery, and reduce potential safety hazards[53]. According to the tensile test and rheological test, the mechanical properties including strength, modulus and elongation at break can be measured.

2.5 Thermal and chemical stability

Reliable thermal stability (> 150 ° C) can guarantee the stable operation of the battery under high temperature conditions, which is usually tested by thermogravimetric analysis, ranging from liquid nitrogen temperature to room temperature, and then to the set temperature above room temperature[54]. Chemical stability requires that chemical reactions do not occur during battery operation, including within the electrolyte, with the electrodes, or with the current collector and packaging materials[55].
In addition, the electrolyte and the electrode should have good interfacial compatibility to reduce the interfacial impedance. The electrolyte membrane should have an appropriate thickness. If the thickness is too small, it is difficult to resist the penetration of lithium dendrites, which will lead to a series of safety problems. If the thickness is too thick, the impedance of the electrolyte will be too large, which is not conducive to improving the energy density and power density of the battery.

3 Multidimensional non-lithium inorganic hybrid component

In polymer electrolytes, lithium ion transport mainly occurs in the amorphous region of the polymer chain segment, and the segmented motion of the chain supports the migration of lithium ions from one coordination site to a new coordination site on the chain, or from one chain to another under the action of an electric field. The inert lithium-free filler promotes ionic conduction mainly from the following aspects: (1) the filler reacts with the polymer to reduce the glass transition temperature and crystallinity of the polymer, so that the polymer chain segment is easier to swing; (2) Lewis acid-base interaction between the filler and the lithium salt promotes the dissociation of the lithium salt, thereby increasing the concentration of mobile lithium ions[56]; (3) The interaction between the filler with high specific surface area and the polymer matrix produces more interfacial layers, and these filler-polymer interfaces can serve as new fast ion transport channels to improve ionic conductivity; (4) Some functional groups in the filler can interact with lithium salt anions to restrict the movement of anions and increase the transference number of lithium ions. The functional group is coordinated with lithium ion or polymer to weaken the interaction between polymer and ion, thereby reducing the energy barrier of lithium ion migration.

3.1 Zero-dimensional nanoparticle

Zero-dimensional nanomaterials usually refer to very small particles (nanoparticles) and clusters. Ceramic nanoparticles can destroy the local reorganization of the polymer chain, reduce the crystallinity, expose more amorphous regions, and improve the swing ability of the polymer chain segment to promote the conduction of lithium ions. Nanoparticles have larger specific surface area, which can provide more active sites, and high Young's modulus and hardness can improve the mechanical stability of polymer electrolytes, which is conducive to the suppression of lithium dendrites. Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a nanoparticle promoting ion conduction by enhancing the movement of a polymer segment.
图3 零维纳米颗粒通过增强聚合物链段运动提高锂离子传导能力示意图

Fig.3 Schematic diagram of 0 D nanoparticles improving lithium ion conductivity by enhancing polymer chain segment movement

Lv et al. Used methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (KH570) to modify SiO2, and then copolymerized PEO with the modified SiO2 under UV conditions to reduce the crystallinity of PEO, so that it could achieve 3.37×10-4S/cm conductivity at room temperature[57]. Similarly, Li et al. Utilized the interaction between the — NCO of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and the — OH of SiO2 particles to prepare TDI-SiO2 nanoparticles, which were then grafted onto PEO to form a cross-linked network, and the TDI-SiO2 nanoparticles provided a more continuous Li-ion conduction path while enhancing the movement of polymer segments, broadening the electrochemical stability window (5.6 V vs Li/Li+)[58]. Lee et al. Synthesized nano ZrO2 particles in situ on a polyester substrate P(CL80TMC20). This in situ synthesis method reduced the agglomeration of nanoparticles and made the particles disperse uniformly in the polymer matrix[59]. The ionic conductivity of the electrolyte at 30 ° C is 1.7×10-5S/cm, which is higher than that of the electrolyte synthesized ex situ (5.6×10-6S/cm). Guo et al. Doped poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) with nano-sized TiO2 particles and triethyl phosphate (TEP) to promote the rapid conduction of Li+ using the electric double layer on the surface of TiO2[30]. When the TiO2 particles are dissolved, the released cations are attached to the Helmholtz layer, and the Li+ in the lithium salt is attracted to the diffusion layer to form unstable adsorption. At the same time, the interaction between the nanoparticles and Li+ promotes the movement ability of PEG segments, and the migration of Li+ is accelerated under the action of electric field and segment movement. This electric field effect can guide the uniform deposition of lithium ions and inhibit the formation of lithium dendrites, thus enhancing the interfacial compatibility of electrolyte/electrode. The cycle performance of the lithium-lithium symmetrical battery was tested at a constant current of 0.01 mA/cm2, and the battery could cycle stably for 800 H without short circuit. Although scholars have found that the introduction of nanoparticles destroys the crystal structure of some polymer skeletons and increases their amorphous regions and free volume, the mechanism of nanoparticles promoting lithium ion conduction at the micro-molecular level has not been thoroughly studied.To fill this gap, Song et al. Thoroughly investigated the effect of oxygen vacancy-rich nanofillers on the transport mechanism of lithium ions at the molecular level[60]. Taking nanoscale Al2O3 and nanoscale TiO2 as examples, they revealed that the effect of nanofillers on improving the ionic conductivity of PEO-based electrolytes containing lithium salts is due to synergistic dissociation and trapping effects. The polar filler can interact with the ion pair of lithium salt to produce a local induced dipole, which weakens the Coulomb attraction within the ion pair and dissociates the ion pair to produce abundant anions and lithium ions. The oxygen vacancy of the filler preferentially interacts with the anions to restrict the movement of the anions and increase the transference number of lithium ions. Although fillers without oxygen vacancies can also improve ionic conductivity by dissociating ion pairs, the lithium ion transference number is not high due to the inability to trap anions. The relationship between oxygen holes and ionic conductivity is also applicable to other systems, which provides a general method for the design of inorganic-polymer composite electrolytes. Table 1 summarizes the main electrochemical properties and the corresponding battery performance of the solid state electrolyte based on inert nanoparticle fillers.
表1 基于纳米颗粒的复合聚合物电解质的主要电化学性质

Table 1 Main electrochemical properties of composite polymer electrolytes with nanoparticles

0 D nanoparticles Electrolyte Ionic
conductivity(S/cm)
Lithium-ion transference number Electrochemical stability window (vs
Li+/Li)(V)
Performance of battery ref
0.5 wt% TiO2 CPE-8 1.97×10-4(25 ℃) 5. LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial discharge capacity is 149 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate after 140 cycles is 90% (0.2 C) 81
8 wt% TDI-SiO2 PEO-TDI-SiO2 1.2×10-4(25 ℃) 0.33 5.6 Graphene foam-LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial discharge capacity is 149.8 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rates after 100 cycles and 200 cycles are 93.8% and 83.7%, respectively (0.2 C) 58
4 wt% Al2O3 GPE 3.37×10-3 (24 ℃) 0.74 4.5 LiFePO4/Li battery: The highest capacity can reach 140 mAh/g. After 200 cycles, the capacity remains at 115 mAh/g, and the retention rate is 82.1% (100 mA/g) 82
9 wt% SiO2 PAN-in situ 3.5×10-4(20 ℃) 0.52 5.2 Li/ /NCM622 battery: The initial capacity is 173.1 mAh/g, the discharge capacity remains at 162.3 mAh/g after 200 cycles, and the capacity retention rate is 93.7% (0.1 C) 83
10 wt% KH570-modified SiO2 KSCE-PEO 3.37×10-4(25 ℃) 4.9 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 138.31 mAh/g, and the discharge capacity after 100 cycles is 144.4 mAh/g (0.2 C) 57
7.5 wt% TiO2 PVdF-co-HFP-LiTFSI-EC-TiO2-NCF 2.69×10-3 (30 ℃) 0.53 5.4 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 145 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate after 50 cycles is 94% (0.1 C) 84
TiO2 PVDF-HFP/TBOB 7.4×10-3(25 ℃) 5.5 LiFePO4/Li battery: It can stably charge and discharge for 600 cycles at 0.1 C, with little capacity attenuation 85
10 wt% γ-Al2O3 FSI-based NSPE 5.4×10-4(70 ℃) 0.15 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 160 mAh/g, and the capacity after 50 cycles is 156 mAh/g (0.1 C) 86
ZnO VPI-ZnO/PEO/LiTFSI 1.5×10-5(25 ℃) 0.31 4.5 NMC811/Li battery: The initial capacity is 164.7 mAh/g. It remains 132.8 mAh/g after 200 cycles, and the capacity retention rate is 82.0% (0.5 C) 28
4 wt% ZrO2 P(CL80TMC20)-LiTFSI0.28-ZrO2 1.7×10-5(30 ℃) 0.83~0.87 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 150 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 82% after 55 cycles (0.1 C) 59
TiO2 PEG-TEP-TiO2 1.9×10-5(70 ℃) 5.32 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 125.7 mAh/g, the capacity after 200 cycles is 102.0 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 82% (0.2 C) 30
γ-Al2O3 QSE 1.1×10-3(25 ℃) 0.62 5.0 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 141.8 mAh/g. After 50 cycles, the capacity is 136.8 mAh/g and the capacity retention rate is 96.5% (0.1 C) 87
SiO2 SiES 1.74×10-3(25 ℃) 0.44 4.91 LiFePO4/Li battery: After 200 cycles, the capacity is still 159.3 mAh/g (0.2 C) 88
Due to its high surface energy and easy agglomeration, nano-ceramic particles are separated from the polymer matrix, and the agglomerated particles will block the ionic conduction channel and reduce the ionic conductivity. In addition, the poor interfacial compatibility due to the weak interaction between inorganic ceramics and organic polymers further reduces the dispersion of ceramic particles in the polymer matrix. For this reason, researchers have proposed methods to modify the structure of ceramic particles, such as coating ceramic particles in polymers to form inorganic-organic core-shell structure, so as to improve the stability of fillers in polymer matrix.
In the early stage, Lee et al. Treated SiO2 with vinyltrimethoxysilane (VTMS), and the surface of the modified SiO2 contained carbon-carbon double bonds, and then carried out radical polymerization with sodium 4-toluenesulfonate to obtain a material with a core layer of SiO2 and a shell layer of poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate), and then obtained the shell layer of poly (lithium 4-styrenesulfonate) by ion exchange method, and finally obtained a core-shell structure SiO2(Li+) (Fig. 4)[61]. They doped core-shell SiO2(Li+) into PVDF-HFP substrate to prepare composite electrolyte. However, the particle size of this SiO2(Li+) is relatively large (~ 2.0 μm), which limits its application in solid-state electrolytes. Therefore, they optimized the size of the core layer and shell layer on the basis of the above SiO2(Li+)), and prepared a SiO2 core layer with an average diameter of 200 nm and a shell layer with a thickness of 320 nm, which significantly improved the physicochemical and electrochemical properties of the electrolyte[62,63]. Gao et al. Used a similar method to prepare filler SiO2-PAA@Li with core-shell structure, and then blended the filler with PVDF-HFP, EMITSI, and LiTFSI to prepare gel polymer (ILGPE-SiO2-PAA@Li)[64]. It is found that ILGPE-SiO2-PAA@Li has good adhesion and interfacial compatibility with anode lithium, which can provide interfacial transport channels for lithium ions and inhibit the formation of lithium dendrites. When the filler content is 15 wt%, there is almost no shrinkage deformation at more than 200 ℃, showing excellent heat resistance. The initial discharge capacity of the LiFePO4/ILGPE-15%-SiO2-PAA@Li/Li cell is as high as 138 mAh/G at 0. 05 C, and the capacity retention rate is 87% (120. 1 mAh/G) after 100 cycles of stable operation. Similarly, Khan et al. Found that when the outer surface of SiO2 was coated with a layer of PMMA and the content was 10 wt%, the PVDF-HFP-based electrolyte had the highest ionic conductivity of 2.22 mS/cm, while the unmodified SiO2 content reached the maximum ionic conductivity (1.33 mS/cm) at 4 wt%[65].
图4 核壳结构SiO2 颗粒的(a)TEM图像和在直径方向上的(b)能量色散X射线光谱(EDXS)分布[61]

Fig.4 (a) TEM image and (b) EDXS profile of core-shell structured SiO2 particle in the direction of diameter[61]. Copyright 2012, Elsevier

3.2 One-dimensional nanostructure

One-dimensional nanomaterials refer to materials in which the size of one of the three dimensions is not between 0.1 and 100 nm, including nanowires, nanotubes, nanorods, nanoribbons, etc. Compared with isolated nanoparticles, one-dimensional nanostructures have larger specific surface area, larger aspect ratio and more exposed active sites, which can provide a longer distance continuous ion conduction pathway.Creating an effective percolating network, a higher surface-to-volume ratio is beneficial to reduce the crystallinity of the polymer and enhance the polymer segment movement, thereby improving the ionic conductivity. Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of the ion conduction pathway constructed by the nanorods.
图5 一维纳米棒构建的离子传导途径示意图

Fig.5 Schematic diagram of ion conduction pathway constructed by 1 D nanorods

As early as 2016, Liu et al. Reported a composite electrolyte of PAN modified by Y2O3 doped ZrO2 nanowires, and explored the effect of doping different concentrations of Y2O3 in ZrO2 nanowires on ionic conductivity[66]. With the in-depth understanding of one-dimensional inorganic fillers, the research of one-dimensional structure in electrolytes has become more and more extensive. Ao et al. Used a variety of characterization methods to compare CeO2 nanoparticles and CeO2 nanowires, and they found that the network structure formed by interwoven CeO2 nanowires can be used as a fast conduction channel for Li+.PAN doped with 10 wt%CeO2 nanowires at 60 ° C can achieve a high ionic conductivity of 1.1×10-3S/cm, while the ionic conductivity of PAN doped with CeO2 particles under the same conditions is only 5.9×10-4S/cm[67]. The plating/stripping test was carried out at a current of 0.25 mA/cm2, and the results showed that the stable and low hysteresis potential was maintained within 2000 H, indicating that the CeO2 nanowires could effectively suppress the lithium dendrite. In order to obtain more point defects and enhance the cooperative dissociation and trapping effect, Chen et al. Doped low-cost Ca in CeO2 and prepared Ca-CeO2 nanotubes by electrospinning technology, whose hollow structure increased the contact area with PEO matrix.Similarly, Gao et al. Reported a composite electrolyte es-PVDF-PEO-GDC formed by gadolinium-doped ceria (Gd-doped CeO2,GDC) ceramic nanowires and PVDF-PEO composite nanofiber membrane,The doping of gadolinium increases the oxygen vacancy of CeO2, and the ionic conductivity of es-PVDF-PEO-GDC at 30 ℃ can reach 2.3×10-4S/cm, the lithium ion transfer number is 0. 64, the tensile strength is 10. 8 MPa, and the average coulombic efficiency is 99. 2% after 250 cycles at 0. 5 C[68][64]. Li et al. Prepared Ti3+ doped TiO2 nanowires through the bridging effect of TDI, which was applied to PEO-based electrolyte as a modifier (Fig. 6)[69]. The oxygen vacancy in the TiO2 nanowire can stabilize the free ion, promote the dissociation of lithium salt by Lewis acid-base interaction with the anion, and provide a continuous and long-range ionic conduction path. When the doping amount of TDI-TiO2 is 8%, the ionic conductivity is 1×10-4S/cm at 30 ℃, and the lithium ion transfer number is 0.36. The cross-linked network formed by the TDI-TiO2 nanowires and the polymer substrate helps to improve the electrochemical stability and increase the electrochemical stability window (5.5 V vs Li/Li+). Table 2 summarizes the main electrochemical properties of the inert 1D nanowire-based solid-state electrolyte and the corresponding battery performance.
图6 (a)TDI接枝TiO2制备示意图和(b)电解质制备及应用示意图[69]

Fig.6 (a) The preparation scheme of TDI grafted TiO2 and (b) schematic diagram of electrolyte preparation and application[69]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier

表2 基于惰性一维纳米填料的复合聚合物电解质的主要电化学性质

Table 2 Main electrochemical properties of composite polymer electrolytes with inert one-dimensional nanofiller

1 D nanostructure Electrolyte Ionic
conductivity(S/cm)
Lithium-ion transference number Electrochemical stability window
(vs Li+/Li)(V)
Performance of battery ref
Ca-CeO2 nanotube Ca-CeO2/LiTFSI/PEO 1.3×10-4(60 ℃) 0.453 4.5 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 125.7 mAh/g, the capacity after 200 cycles is 102.0 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 82% (0.2 C) 68
10 wt% Sm-
CeO2 nanowire
PVDF-based CPE 9.09×10-5(30 ℃) 0.40 4.89 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 155.1 mAh/g, and the discharge capacity after 130 cycles is 155.3 mAh/g (1 C) 89
8 wt% TDI-
TiO2 nanowire
PEO-TDI-TiO2 1.04×10-3(60 ℃) 0.36 5.5 NCM811/Li battery: The initial discharge capacity is 161.1 mAh/g, and the discharge capacity after 40 cycles is 150.3 mAh/g (0.1 C) 75
10 wt%
CeO2 nanowire
CSPE-10NW 1.1×10-3(60 ℃) 0.47 5.1 LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity retention rate is 98% and 91% after 100 cycles and 280 cycles, respectively (0.1 C) 67
Gd-CeO2 nanowire es-PVDF-PEO-GDC 2.3×10-4(30 ℃) 0.64 4.5 LiFePO4/Li battery: After 600 cycles, the capacity is still 119.4 mAh/g, and the coulombic efficiency is ~99.8% (1 C) 64
CNF CNF/PEO 3.1×10-5(25 ℃) Li/Li symmetrical battery: stable cycling for more than 280 hours at 0.2 mA/cm2 90
10 wt%
Mg2B2O5 nanowire
PEO-LiTFSI-
10 wt%
Mg2B2O5
3.7×10-4(50 ℃) 0.44 4.75 LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity retention after 230 cycles is ~120 mAh/g, and coulombic efficiency is ~100% (1 C) 91
3 wt% VSB-
5 nanorod
PEO-LiTFSI-3%VSB-5 4.83×10-5(30 ℃) 0.13 4.13 LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity remains 157.4 mAh/g after 50 cycles, with excellent cycle performance and rate performance 92
5 wt%
HNT
HNT-PCL 6.62×10-5(30 ℃) 0.65 5.4 LiMn0.5Fe0.5PO4/Li battery: The initial discharge capacity is 134 mAh/g, the capacity after 250 cycles is 117 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 87% (0.2 C) 93
HNT TPU-HNTs-LiFSI-PE 1.87×10-5(60 ℃) 0.24 5.1 NCM/Li battery: The initial capacity is 114 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 89.99% after 300 cycles (0.5 C) 94
10 wt%
SiO2 nanotube
(SNts)
PEO/LiTFSI/SNts 4.35×10-4(30 ℃) 0.65 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 151 mAh/g, the capacity remains 126 mAh/g after 100 cycles, and the capacity retention rate is ~83.4% (0.1 C) 95
1.0 wt% NWCNTs UPHC 1.1×10-3(25 ℃) 0.64 5.08 LSB: The initial capacity is 704.5 mAh/g, the discharge capacity after 300 cycles is 608.8 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 86.4% (0.5 C) 96

3.3 Two-dimensional nanosheet

Two-dimensional materials are ultrathin materials with high anisotropy and chemical functionality, which have extremely large specific surface area and can form effective interfacial interaction with polymer matrix. The performance improvement of polymer electrolyte is highly related to the structure of the filler. Generally, the layered structure with large specific surface area, high porosity and polar materials are beneficial to the full contact or interaction between the filler and the polymer matrix and lithium salt, and improve the stability and dispersion of the filler in the polymer system. Two-dimensional materials such as MOFs, COFs, graphene and boron nitride usually have abundant functional groups and specific crystal structures. The interaction between some functional groups and lithium salts and polymers can promote the dissociation of lithium salts, inhibit the movement of anions and improve the transference number of lithium ions. The unique size selectivity of periodic porous materials also contributes to the transport of lithium ions. The larger size surface of the two-dimensional packing can form a richer active interface with the polymer matrix and construct a fast ion transport channel. Taking graphene oxide as an example, it is shown that the utilization of the functional groups of two-dimensional inert fillers and the construction of larger inert filler-polymer active interfaces can enhance ion transport, as shown in Figure 7.
图7 LiClO4-PAN电解质中锂离子传导机制示意图[70]

Fig.7 The schematic illustration of Li+ conduction mechanism in LiClO4-PAN electrolyte[70]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier

Two-dimensional layered boron nitride (BN) is a honeycomb-like material composed of nitrogen atoms and boron atoms, which has a crystal structure similar to graphene. Due to the inherent physical and chemical properties of BN, it can improve the performance of solid polymer electrolytes when used as an additive. The heat resistance of boron nitride can alleviate the heating problem during the working process of the battery, the excellent mechanical stability is beneficial to inhibiting the growth of lithium dendrite and improving the safety performance of the battery, and the electronic insulation and electrochemical stability of boron nitride mean that the boron nitride can remain stable and does not participate in the battery reaction during the long-term working of the battery[71]. When applied to quasi-solid electrolyte, the high porosity of boron nitride is beneficial to the absorption of electrolyte, and the interlayer or external channels can be used as the conduction path of lithium ions to improve the ionic conductivity. Recent studies have shown that boron nitride can adsorb polysulfides and lithium ions, which is beneficial to improve the electrochemical performance of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries[72]. This paper mainly focuses on the effect of BN nanosheets as an additive on the performance of the electrolyte.
Initially, Li et al. Used a template-free heat treatment process to synthesize porous g-BN nanosheets, which were used as the main body of the electrolyte to absorb ionic liquids and prepare quasi-liquid solid-state electrolytes.Its ionic conductivity at room temperature and low temperature (− 20 ° C) is 3.85×10-3S/cm and 2.32×10-4S/cm, respectively, which is the earliest work using boron nitride nanosheets as the electrolyte framework, and also provides an idea for the development of solid-state electrolytes for two-dimensional layered nanomaterials[73]. Subsequently, Shim et al. First used boron nitride as an additive in solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries, and found that it could significantly improve the performance of polymer electrolytes, especially effectively inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites[74]. They prepared perfluoropolyether modified boron nitride nano sheets (BNNS) by ultrasound-assisted exfoliation and non-covalent functionalization, then added them into PVDF-co-HFP matrix to prepare porous composite membrane, and soaked the porous membrane in electrolyte (1 mol/L LiTFSI in EC: DEC (1:1 vol%)) to prepare composite gel electrolyte (Fig. 8). The functionalized boron nitride reduces the crystallinity of PVDF-co-HFP, and the resulting porous structure facilitates the absorption of solvent, thereby improving the ionic conductivity. Even with only 0.5 wt% doping, the prepared composite electrolyte can achieve a high Li-ion transfer number ( t L i + = 0.62), a high Young's modulus (110 GPa), and a high tensile strength (53 MPa), and the Li-Li symmetric battery can be stably cycled for more than 1940 H at a constant current of 0.1 mA/cm2 and maintain a low voltage hysteresis, which indicates that boron nitride has a significant advantage in suppressing lithium dendrite. However, due to the weak chemical interaction between boron nitride and polymer matrix, the compatibility and dispersion are poor, resulting in the increase of thermal resistance at the interface, which can not give full play to the thermal properties of boron nitride. For this reason, Zhang et al. Used SiO2 to modify the surface of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets to prepare PEO/LiTFSI/SiO2@BNNS composite electrolyte, which improved the electrical conductivity and thermal properties of boron nitride by introducing defects (SiO2)[75]. The SiO2@BNNS composite can form a thermal channel in the polymer system to enhance the thermal stability of the electrolyte. When the temperature rises to 150 ℃, the composite membrane has almost no thermal shrinkage and the shape remains unchanged, while the Celgard 2300 membrane and PEO/LiTFSI membrane have obvious deformation. Table 3 summarizes the main electrochemical properties and the corresponding battery performance of the 2D boron nitride nanosheet-based solid-state electrolyte.
图8 (a)G-CFBN的制备示意图,(b)CFBN (0.5 wt% FBN)的照片,(c) CFBN (0.5 wt% FBN) 的SEM图像,表面(左)和横截面(右), 25 ℃下Li/电解质/ LiFePO4电池的电化学性能,其中电解质为G-CFBN和LE-Celgard(d)在0.1 C下的长循环性能和(e)含G-CFBN电解质的电池在10 C下的长循环性能[74]

Fig.8 (a) Schematic illustration of the overall procedure for the preparation of G-CFBNs, (b) photograph of CFBN (0.5 wt% FBN), (c) surface (left) and cross-sectional (right) SEM images of CFBN (0.5 wt% FBN), Electrochemical performance of Li/electrolyte/LiFePO4 cells cycled at 25 ℃, where the electrolyte is G-CFBN and LE-Celgard, (d) long-term cycling performance of the cells at 1.0 C, and (e) long-term cycling performance of the cells containing G-CFBN at 10 C[74]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier

表3 基于二维氮化硼纳米片的复合聚合物电解质的主要电化学性质

Table 3 Main electrochemical properties of composite polymer electrolytes with 2D boron nitride nanosheets

BNNS Electrolyte Ionic
conductivity(S/cm)
Lithium-ion transference number Electrochemical stability window (vs Li+/Li)(V) Performance of battery ref
BNNS BNNs-MPS-PEGDA(BNP) 1.05×10-4(25 ℃) 0.49 5.5 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 125 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate for 600 cycles is 80% (0.5 C) 97
4 wt% SiO2
@BNNS
SiO2@
BNNS-PEO
4.53×10-4(60 ℃) 0.54 4.71 LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity can remain ~131 mAh/g after 900 cycles(1 C) 75
BNNS BN-PEO-PVDF 2.0×10-4(70 ℃) LSB: The initial discharge capacity is~1200 mAh/g, after 50 cycles the capacity is ~790 mAh/g (0.05 C) 98
6 wt% h-BN PEO/LiTFSI/h-BN 1.45×10-4(80 ℃) 0.33 5.16 LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity remains 134 mAh/g after 140 cycles, and the capacity retention rate is 93% (0.2 C) 99
1.5 wt%
AFBBNS
BN GPE 6.47×10-4(25 ℃) 0.23 4.5 LSB: a high initial discharge capacity of 142.2 mAh/g and 132.8 mAh/g at 0.1 C and 0.2 C 100
1% BN BN-PVDF-HFP/ LiTFSI 1.82×10-3(25 ℃) 4.8 LiFePO4/Li battery: The initial capacity is 150 mAh/g, and the capacity is 116 mAh/g after 50 cycles (0.2 C) 101
40 wt% hBN hBN gel electrolyte 1.0×10-3(25 ℃) 5.3 Gr-LFP/Li battery: The initial capacity is 160 mAh/g, the discharge capacity after 100 cycles is 144 mAh/g, and the capacity retention rate is 90%(10 C,175 ℃) 102
BNNS BNNSs-coated PEO 2.0×10-4(60 ℃) LiFePO4/Li battery: The capacity can remain 110 mAh/g after 200 cycles (2 C) 103

3.4 Three-dimensional structure

Materials with three-dimensional structure refer to composite materials composed of one or more basic units in zero, one or two dimensions, usually bulk materials. The mechanical support of the three-dimensional framework is better, which can ensure better lithium dendrite inhibition, and its connectivity and permeability are also better than those of the two-dimensional lamella, which can conduct lithium ions in more dimensions[76]. Taking the SiO2-PEO continuous nanonetwork constructed in Fig. 9 as an example, the three-dimensional network structure not only provides abundant ion transport channels and improves the ionic conductivity, but also effectively enhances the mechanical properties of the electrolyte membrane and improves the dimensional stability.
图9 SiO2-PEO三维网络促进离子运输的示意图[77]

Fig.9 Schematic diagram of SiO2-PEO three-dimensional network promoting ion transport[77]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier

The main components of glass fiber are SiO2, CaO, Al2O3, etc., and these oxides play an important role in improving the mechanical strength and ionic conductivity of the electrolyte. Zhang et al. filled PEO, LiTFSI and ionic liquid into a 3D glass fiber cloth (GFC) framework to prepare a composite electrolyte (Fig. 10). The 3D rigid framework gives the electrolyte good mechanical support, and its polar groups (— OH, Si — O bonds) can guide the uniform deposition of lithium.The Li/PEO @ GFC/Li symmetrical cell was cycled stably for more than 1000 H at a current of 0.2 mA/cm2, and the plating/stripping voltage was stable at about 0. 21 V, while the Li/PEO/Li cell could only cycle for 400 H under the same conditions, and the voltage fluctuated greatly, which would cause internal short circuit due to the growth of lithium dendrites[78]. The glass fiber skeleton across the PEO matrix destroyed the crystal structure of the polymer and exposed more amorphous regions, which facilitated the transport of lithium ions, and the polar groups reacting with lithium salt anions enhanced the dissociation of lithium salts, and the PEO @ GFC had an ionic conductivity of 1.1×10-5S/cm and a lithium ion transference number of 0.30 at 30 ° C, which were superior to the electrical properties of PEO electrolyte under the same conditions (7.6×10-6S/cm, t L i + = 0.24). Similarly, Wang et al. Replaced the ionic liquid with the plasticizer succinonitrile (SN). Although the addition of the plasticizer can greatly improve the ionic conductivity, it reduces the mechanical properties of the electrolyte. The 3D glass fiber framework can compensate for the mechanical loss to some extent[79]. When doped with 25 wt% succinonitrile and 10 wt% glass fiber, the ionic conductivity of PEO-SN25-LiTFSI10-GF can reach 2.84×10-4S/cm at room temperature, which is two orders of magnitude higher than that of pure PEO. The electrochemical stability window is 5. 5 V, which shows excellent mechanical stability and electrochemical stability. The assembled LiFePO4/Li battery is tested at 0. 2 C, the initial discharge capacity is 150 mAh/G, and the capacity almost does not decay after 100 cycles, which is 147. 8 mAh/G, achieving a high capacity retention rate of 98. 5%.
图10 三维玻璃纤维布和PEO构建的复合电解质示意图[78]

Fig.10 Schematic diagram of composite electrolyte constructed by 3D glass fiber cloth and PEO[78]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier

In addition to the three-dimensional glass fiber skeleton, the researchers also explored the effect of non-lithium inorganic fillers with microsphere structure on the electrochemical performance of batteries when applied to electrolytes. Hu et al. First proposed that the polymer electrolyte (PEO-LiTFSI-0.2C3N4,20 wt%C3N4) with tightly packed polygraphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) microspheres was applied to the conversion-type FeF3 cathode, and the Li/FeF3 battery has a high theoretical energy density (850 Wh/kg) and no solid-liquid phase conversion of lithium polysulfide, which is considered to be a battery system with the possibility of achieving high-energy all-solid-state[80]. The g-C3N4 nanosheets are self-assembled to form a highly regular microsphere structure, the microspheres are tightly stacked to form a firm porous framework structure, and the PEO molecular chain can penetrate into the pores to enable the g-C3N4 to be deeply crosslinked with the polymerized lithium salt, thereby enhancing the mechanical strength of the composite electrolyte.The high Young's modulus (285 MPa) and lithium dendrite inhibition function were achieved, and the electrochemical stability window was improved to 5. 12 V. Plating/stripping tests of lithium-lithium symmetric cells were carried out at currents of 0. 1 and 0.2 mA/cm2, and the stable cycling time without short circuit was as long as 10 400 and 5000 H, respectively. The binding energy between g-C3N4 and lithium salt is larger, which is beneficial to the adsorption of lithium salt anions, increases the lithium ion transference number ( t L i + = 0.69) and reduces the potential decomposition of lithium salt anions, and enhances the stability of the passivation layer on the anode side. The microsphere filler has better interfacial compatibility and can realize high capacity retention rate and cycle reversibility when being applied to a Li/FeF3 battery.

4 Conclusion and prospect

Solid-state composite polymer electrolytes have broad application prospects in the development of lithium batteries with high energy density, high specific capacity and high cycle stability. Compared with the traditional organic electrolyte, the solid electrolyte is non-volatile, not easy to leak, has high mechanical strength, can inhibit the formation of lithium dendrites, and has good safety performance. The composite electrolyte combines the advantages of inorganic electrolyte and polymer electrolyte, and has the advantages of high ionic conductivity, high lithium ion transference number and good interfacial compatibility[68]. In this paper, based on the performance requirements of composite polymer electrolytes, the research progress of inert lithium-free fillers in composite polymer electrolytes in recent years was summarized from the non-lithium inorganic hybrid components with different dimensions, aiming to provide a reference for the structural design of non-lithium fillers and the improvement of the safety and electrochemical performance of lithium batteries.
(1) As a non-ionic conductor, the inert lithium-free filler does not directly participate in ionic conduction, and it promotes ionic conduction by lowering the glass transition temperature and crystallinity of the polymer and increasing the amorphous region of the polymer. The addition of inorganic fillers can enhance the mechanical properties and heat resistance of the electrolyte, inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites and improve its safety at high temperatures. The surface of the filler with defects can capture lithium salt anions due to the action of charges, promote the dissociation of lithium salt, and improve the transference number of lithium ions. In addition, the pore channel formed by the inorganic filler-organic polymer can also be used as an ion conduction channel to improve the ion conductivity.
(2) The application of zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional non-lithium inorganic hybrid components in composite electrolytes is introduced in this paper. The enhancement effects of different dimensional filler structures on ion transport, electronic conduction, interfacial compatibility and mechanical stability are different.Therefore, when designing organic-inorganic composite electrolytes, it is necessary to consider the performance requirements and design appropriate inert fillers with different dimensions. At present, most composite electrolytes are prepared by solution casting method, and nanoparticles are still the mainstream inert fillers studied, but because of their high surface energy, they are very easy to agglomerate in polymer substrates, so we provide two strategies. First, in situ synthesis. The in-situ synthesis method fundamentally solves the agglomeration problem of nanomaterials, so that the nanoparticles can be uniformly dispersed in the polymer to the maximum extent, providing abundant active sites and improving the mechanical strength of the electrolyte membrane. Second, construct a 3D network structure. Whether zero-dimensional or one-dimensional nanostructures, the aggregation of fillers is inevitable to form discontinuous channels, while the continuous three-dimensional structure can inhibit the aggregation of fillers and construct fast ion transport channels. In addition, the ion conductivity can also be significantly improved by using inert fillers to design ordered ion transport channels perpendicular to the electrolyte membrane to shorten the ion diffusion path as much as possible. Considering the performance of composite electrolyte, 3D inert filler will have more development space in the future. First, it reduces the agglomeration of the filler and exposes more active sites, which is beneficial to the interaction with lithium salt and polymer. Secondly, the 3D network structure provides a continuous ion transport channel to promote the conduction of ions. Thirdly, the 3 D inert filler enhances the mechanical properties of the membrane and improves the ability to inhibit lithium dendrite. Finally, the structural gaps of some 3D inert fillers allow the infiltration of polymers, and the electrolyte membrane can be designed to be both rigid and flexible.
(3) Nevertheless, there are still some obvious defects in the composite electrolyte, such as the complex structural design of inorganic fillers, the generally low transference number of lithium ions (< 0.7), and the interfacial compatibility needs to be improved. For the electrochemical stability window, the electrochemical window of most composite electrolytes can reach more than 4. 5 V, which is enough to meet the voltage requirements of high-voltage cathode (such as NCM811). In order to improve the performance of composite polymer electrolytes in the future, we should not only focus on the effective lithium ion conductivity, but also consider the compatibility of inorganic fillers and organic frameworks, as well as the interfacial stability between solid electrolytes and electrode materials in the structural design, so as to reduce the occurrence of side reactions at the interface and improve the safety and cycle life of batteries.
(4) Due to the high cost and complex preparation process of active lithium-containing fillers, they are mostly used for laboratory research, and large-scale industrial application is unrealistic.The advantages of economy and convenient synthesis of inert lithium-free fillers make them have greater potential in industrial application. Based on this, the composite electrolyte with non-lithium inorganic hybrid components is the trend of commercial application in the future.
[1]
Tarascon J M, Armand M. Nature, 2001, 414(6861): 359.

[2]
Aricò A S, Bruce P, Scrosati B, Tarascon J M, van Schalkwijk W. Nat. Mater., 2005, 4(5): 366.

[3]
Cheng X B, Zhao C Z, Yao Y X, Liu H, Zhang Q. Chem, 2019, 5(1): 74.

[4]
Li C F, Liu S H, Shi C G, Liang G H, Lu Z T, Fu R W, Wu D C. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10: 1363.

[5]
Wang R H, Cui W S, Chu F L, Wu F X. J. Energy Chem., 2020, 48: 145.

[6]
Liu Z X, Huang Y, Huang Y, Yang Q, Li X L, Huang Z D, Zhi C Y. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49(1): 180.

[7]
Lu Y Y, Tu Z Y, Archer L A. Nat. Mater., 2014, 13(10): 961.

[8]
Goodenough J B, Park K S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(4): 1167.

[9]
Xu R, Cheng X B, Yan C, Zhang X Q, Xiao Y, Zhao C Z, Huang J Q, Zhang Q. Matter, 2019, 1(2): 317.

[10]
Wang Q S, Jiang L H, Yu Y, Sun J H. Nano Energy, 2019, 55: 93.

[11]
Goodenough J B, Kim Y. Chem. Mater., 2010, 22(3): 587.

[12]
Goriparti S, Miele E, De Angelis F, Di Fabrizio E, Proietti Zaccaria R, Capiglia C. J. Power Sources, 2014, 257: 421.

[13]
Li W Y, Yao H B, Yan K, Zheng G Y, Liang Z, Chiang Y M, Cui Y. Nat. Commun., 2015, 6: 7436.

[14]
Wan J Y, Xie J, Kong X, Liu Z, Liu K, Shi F F, Pei A, Chen H, Chen W, Chen J, Zhang X K, Zong L Q, Wang J Y, Chen L Q, Qin J, Cui Y. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2019, 14(7): 705.

[15]
Tang W J, Tang S, Guan X Z, Zhang X Y, Xiang Q, Luo J Y. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29(16): 1900648.

[16]
Zhao C Z, Zhao B C, Yan C, Zhang X Q, Huang J Q, Mo Y F, Xu X X, Li H, Zhang Q. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 24: 75.

[17]
Wang Q, Yuan B H, Lu Y F, Shen F, Zhao B, Han X G. Nanotechnology, 2021, 32(49): 495401.

[18]
Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao C Z, Archer L A. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2020, 5(3): 229.

[19]
Lim H D, Park J H, Shin H J, Jeong J, Kim J T, Nam K W, Jung H G, Chung K Y. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 25: 224.

[20]
Pan K C, Zhang L, Qian W W, Wu X K, Dong K, Zhang H T, Zhang S J. Adv. Mater., 2020, 32(17): 2000399.

[21]
Li L, Deng Y, Chen G. J. Energy Chem., 2020, 50: 154.

[22]
Li S, Zhang S Q, Shen L, Liu Q, Ma J B, Lv W, He Y B, Yang Q H. Adv. Sci., 2020, 7(5): 1903088.

[23]
Zhao Q, Liu X, Stalin S, Khan K, Archer L A. Nat. Energy, 2019, 4(5): 365.

[24]
Zhao C Z, Zhao Q, Liu X, Zheng J X, Stalin S, Zhang Q, Archer L A. Adv. Mater., 2020, 32(12): 1905629.

[25]
Wu N, Li Y T, Dolocan A, Li W, Xu H H, Xu B Y, Grundish N S, Cui Z M, Jin H B, Goodenough J B. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30(22): 2000831.

[26]
Fan L, Wei S Y, Li S Y, Li Q, Lu Y Y. Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(11): 1702657.

[27]
Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang S, Ying H, Zhuang Z, Ma F, Huang P, Yang T, Han G, Han W Q. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 43: 229.

[28]
Bao W D, Zhao L Q, Zhao H J, Su L X, Cai X C, Yi B L, Zhang Y, Xie J. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 43: 258.

[29]
Hoang H A, Le Mong A, Kim D. J. Power Sources, 2021, 507: 230288.

[30]
Guo J Q, Chen Y P, Xiao Y B, Xi C P, Xu G, Li B R, Yang C K, Yu Y. Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 422: 130526.

[31]
Dhatarwal P, Choudhary S, Sengwa R J. Compos. Commun., 2018, 10: 11.

[32]
Duan H, Fan M, Chen W P, Li J Y, Wang P F, Wang W P, Shi J L, Yin Y X, Wan L J, Guo Y G. Adv. Mater., 2019, 31(12): 1807789.

[33]
Hu J K, He P G, Zhang B C, Wang B Y, Fan L Z. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 26: 283.

[34]
Bag S, Zhou C T, Kim P J, Pol V G, Thangadurai V. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 24: 198.

[35]
Yao M, Zhang H T, Xing C X, Li Q G, Tang Y J, Zhang F J, Yang K, Zhang S J. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 41: 51.

[36]
Yao M, Yu T H, Ruan Q Q, Chen Q J, Zhang H T, Zhang S J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13(39): 47163.

[37]
Wu F, Zhang K, Liu Y R, Gao H C, Bai Y, Wang X R, Wu C. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 33: 26.

[38]
Bocharova V, Sokolov A P. Macromolecules, 2020, 53(11): 4141.

[39]
Costa C M, Lee Y H, Kim J H, Lee S Y, Lanceros-MÉndez S. Energy Storage Mater., 2019, 22: 346.

[40]
Wang X E, Kerr R, Chen F F, Goujon N, Pringle J M, Mecerreyes D, Forsyth M, Howlett P C. Adv. Mater., 2020, 32(18): 1905219.

[41]
Manthiram A, Yu X W, Wang S F. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2017, 2(4): 16103.

[42]
Chen L, Li Y T, Li S P, Fan L Z, Nan C W, Goodenough J B. Nano Energy, 2018, 46: 176.

[43]
Hsu S T, Tran B T, Subramani R, Nguyen H T T, Rajamani A, Lee M Y, Hou S S, Lee Y L, Teng H. J. Power Sources, 2020, 449: 227518.

[44]
Zhao Y, Zhang Y G, Gosselink D, Doan T N L, Sadhu M, Cheang H J, Chen P. Membranes, 2012, 2(3): 553.

[45]
Zhang W Q, Nie J H, Li F, Wang zhong lin, Sun C W. Nano Energy, 2018, 45: 413.

[46]
Zhang Z, Huang Y, Gao H, Hang J X, Li C, Liu P B. J. Membr. Sci., 2020, 598: 117800.

[47]
Lopez J, Mackanic D G, Cui Y, Bao Z N. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2019, 4(5): 312.

[48]
Liu H, Cheng X B, Huang J Q, Yuan H, Lu Y, Yan C, Zhu G L, Xu R, Zhao C Z, Hou L P, He C X, Kaskel S, Zhang Q. ACS Energy Lett., 2020, 5(3): 833.

[49]
Liu S L, Liu W Y, Ba D L, Zhao Y Z, Ye Y H, Li Y Y, Liu J P. Adv. Mater., 2023, 35(2): 2110423.

[50]
Xu K. Chem. Rev., 2014, 114(23): 11503.

[51]
Zou Z Y, Li Y J, Lu Z H, Wang D, Cui Y H, Guo B K, Li Y J, Liang X M, Feng J W, Li H, Nan C W, Armand M, Chen L Q, Xu K, Shi S Q. Chem. Rev., 2020, 120(9): 4169.

[52]
Boaretto N, Meabe L, Martinez-Ibanez M, Armand M, Zhang H. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2020, 167: 070524.

[53]
Cao D X, Sun X, Li Q, Natan A, Xiang P Y, Zhu H L. Matter, 2020, 3(1): 57.

[54]
Li J H, Cai Y F, Wu H M, Yu Z A, Yan X Z, Zhang Q H, Gao T Z, Liu K, Jia X D, Bao Z N. Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11(15): 2003239.

[55]
Zhang Q Q, Liu K, Ding F, Liu X J. Nano Res., 2017, 10(12): 4139.

[56]
Jia M Y, Khurram Tufail M, Guo X X. ChemSusChem, 2023, 16(2): e202201801.

[57]
Lv F, Liu K X, Wang Z Y, Zhu J F, Zhao Y, Yuan S. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 596: 257.

[58]
Li C, Huang Y, Feng X S, Zhang Z, Gao H, Huang J X. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 594: 1.

[59]
Lee T K, Andersson R, Dzulkurnain N A, Hernández G, Mindemark J, Brandell D. Batter. Supercaps, 2021, 4(4): 653.

[60]
Song Y L, Yang L Y, Li J W, Zhang M Z, Wang Y H, Li S N, Chen S M, Yang K, Xu K, Pan F. Small, 2021, 17(42): 2102039.

[61]
Lee Y S, Ju S H, Kim J H, Hwang S S, Choi J M, Sun Y K, Kim H, Scrosati B, Kim D W. Electrochem. Commun., 2012, 17: 18.

[62]
Ju S H, Lee Y S, Sun Y K, Kim D W. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(2): 395.

[63]
Lee Y S, Lee J H, Choi J A, Yoon W Y, Kim D W. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23(8): 1019.

[64]
Gao L, Luo S B, Li J X, Cheng B W, Kang W M, Deng N P. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 43: 266.

[65]
Khan S, Fang C Y, Ma Y C, Haq M U, Nisar M, Xu G, Liu Y, Han G R. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2021, 168(2): 022504.

[66]
Liu W, Lin D C, Sun J, Zhou G M, Cui Y. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(12): 11407.

[67]
Ao X, Wang X, Tan J, Zhang S, Su C, Dong L, Tang M, Wang Z, Tian B, Wang H. Nano Energy, 2021, 79: 105475.

[68]
Chen H, Adekoya D, Hencz L, Ma J, Chen S, Yan C, Zhao H J, Cui G L, Zhang S Q. Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10(21): 2000049.

[69]
Li C, Huang Y, Chen C, Feng X S, Zhang Z. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 563: 150248.

[70]
Jia W S, Li Z L, Wu Z R, Wang L P, Wu B, Wang Y H, Cao Y, Li J Z. Solid State Ion., 2018, 315: 7.

[71]
Pu J, Zhang K, Wang Z H, Li C W, Zhu K P, Yao Y G, Hong G. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31(48): 2106315.

[72]
Zheng Y P, Li H H, Yuan H Y, Fan H H, Li W L, Zhang J P. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 434: 596.

[73]
Li M T, Zhu W S, Zhang P F, Chao Y H, He Q, Yang B L, Li H M, Borisevich A, Dai S. Small, 2016, 12(26): 3535.

[74]
Shim J, Kim H J, Kim B G, Kim Y S, Kim D G, Lee J C. Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10(9): 1911.

[75]
Zhang X L, Guo W Y, Zhou L Z, Xu Q J, Min Y L. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9(36): 20530.

[76]
Du L L, Zhang B, Wang X F, Dong C H, Mai L Q, Xu L. Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 451: 138787.

[77]
Lin D C, Yuen P Y, Liu Y Y, Liu W, Liu N, Dauskardt R H, Cui Y. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(32): 1802661.

[78]
Zhang Z, Huang Y, Gao H, Li C, Huang J X, Liu P B. J. Membr. Sci., 2021, 621: 118940.

[79]
Wang J, Yang J, Shen L, Guo Q Y, He H, Yao X Y. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2021, 4(4): 4129.

[80]
Hu J L, Chen K Y, Yao Z G, Li C L. Sci. Bull., 2021, 66(7): 694.

[81]
Tseng Y C, Ramdhani F I, Hsiang S H, Lee T Y, Teng H, Jan J S. J. Membr. Sci., 2022, 641: 119891.

[82]
Wang S S, Zhou L, Tufail M K, Yang L, Zhai P F, Chen R J, Yang W. Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 415: 128846.

[83]
Yao M, Ruan Q Q, Yu T H, Zhang H T, Zhang S J. Energy Storage Mater., 2022, 44: 93.

[84]
Sasikumar M, Krishna R H, Raja M, Therese H A, Balakrishnan N T M, Raghavan P, Sivakumar P. J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 882: 160709.

[85]
Chen N, Xing Y, Wang L L, Liu F, Li L, Chen R J, Wu F, Guo S J. Nano Energy, 2018, 47: 35.

[86]
Judez X, Piszcz M, Coya E, Li C M, Aldalur I, Oteo U, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Rodriguez-Martinez L M, Zhang H, Armand M. Solid State Ion., 2018, 318: 95.

[87]
Tinghua X, Jian S, Shuhong Y, Dandan W, Yaping L, Qingqing P, Du P, Huiling Z, Ying B. Solid State Ionics, 2018, 326: 110.

[88]
Zhou D, Liu R L, He Y B, Li F Y, Liu M, Li B H, Yang Q H, Cai Q, Kang F Y. Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6(7): 1502214.

[89]
Peiqi L, Peng L, Haoqing L, Ziyang D, Zhenbao Z, Dengjie C. J. Membr. Sci., 2019, 580: 92.

[90]
Hengfei Q, Kun F, Ying Z, Yuhang Y, Mingyao S, Yudi K, Soo-Hwan J, Feng J, Lifeng C. Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 28: 293.

[91]
Sheng O W, Jin C B, Luo J M, Yuan H D, Huang H, Gan Y P, Zhang J, Xia Y, Liang C, Zhang W K, Tao X Y. Nano Lett., 2018, 18(5): 3104.

[92]
Wu Z J, Xie Z K, Yoshida A, Wang J, Yu T, Wang Z D, Hao X G, Abudula A, Guan G Q. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 565: 110.

[93]
Xu H L, Ye W, Wang Q R, Han B, Wang J, Wang C Y, Deng Y H. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9(15): 9826.

[94]
Shen Z C, Zhong J W, Xie W H, Chen J B, Ke X, Ma J M, Shi Z C. Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett., 2021, 34(3): 359.

[95]
Hu J, Wang W H, Zhu X J, Liu S B, Wang Y J, Xu Y J, Zhou S K, He X C, Xue Z G. J. Membr. Sci., 2021, 618: 118697.

[96]
Wang X L, Hao X J, Cai D, Zhang S E, Xia X H, Tu J P. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 382: 122714.

[97]
An H W, Liu Q S, An J L, Liang S T, Wang X F, Xu Z W, Tong Y J, Huo H, Sun N, Wang Y L, Shi Y F, Wang J J. Energy Storage Mater., 2021, 43: 358.

[98]
Yin X S, Wang L, Kim Y, Ding N, Kong J H, Safanama D, Zheng Y, Xu J W, Repaka D V M, Hippalgaonkar K, Lee S W, Adams S, Zheng G W. Adv. Sci., 2020, 7(19): 2001303.

[99]
Li Y H, Zhang L B, Sun Z J, Gao G X, Lu S Y, Zhu M, Zhang Y F, Jia Z Y, Xiao C H, Bu H T, Xi K, Ding S J. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8(19): 9579.

[100]
Kim D, Liu X, Yu B Z, Mateti S, O'dell L A, Rong Q Z, Chen Y. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30(15): 1910813.

[101]
Zhang Z Y, Antonio R G, Leong Choy K. J. Power Sources, 2019, 435: 226736.

[102]
Hyun W J, de Moraes A C M, Lim J M, Downing J R, Park K Y, Tan M T Z, Hersam M C. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(8): 9664.

[103]
Shen B, Zhang T W, Yin Y C, Zhu Z X, Lu L L, Ma C, Zhou F, Yao H B. Chem. Commun., 2019, 55(53): 7703.

Outlines

/