Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Clinical Applications

  • Wenhao Luo 1, 2 ,
  • Rui Yuan 1, 2 ,
  • Jinyuan Sun 1, 2 ,
  • Lianqun Zhou 3 ,
  • Xiaohe Luo , 1, 4, * ,
  • Yang Luo , 1, 5, *
Expand
  • 1 School of Medicine, Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044, China
  • 2 College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044, China
  • 3 Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Suzhou 215163, China
  • 4 Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital,Chongqing 400044, China
  • 5 College of Life Science and Laboratory Medicine, Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650050, China
*e-mail: (Yang Luo);
(Xiaohe Luo)

Received date: 2023-01-31

  Revised date: 2023-04-07

  Online published: 2023-05-30

Supported by

The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFC2009600)

The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFC2009603)

The National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(82125022)

The National Natural Science Foundation of China(82202633)

The National Natural Science Foundation of China(82072383)

The Chongqing Higher Education Teaching Reform Research Project(213035)

Abstract

Enzymes are considered as natural biocatalysts, which catalyze many biochemical reactions with good catalytic efficiency, biocompatibility, and substrate specificity. The intrinsic limitations of natural enzymes such as low stability, high cost, and storage difficulty have led to the introduction of artificial enzymes that imitate the activity of natural enzymes. With the rapid development of nanomaterials in the recent decade, novel enzyme-mimicking nanomaterials (nanozymes) have attracted considerable attention from researchers. Nanozymes are defined as a class of artificial nanomaterials possessing intrinsic enzymes-like activities, which have the advantages of simple preparation processes, low cost and some environmental tolerance. However, most of them are limited by their low activity and relatively poor stability, leading to many difficulties in the application of biochemical analysis. Among them, metal-organic framework nanozymes (MOFs) have demonstrated a wide range of uses because of their evident favorable circumstances, including the large surface area and porosity for functionalization, uniform active sites, high catalytic activity and stability, simple and controllable synthesis and low cost. In this review, we provide a summary of the clinical detection application of MOFs in nucleic acid, protein and small molecules based on their different activity classification (peroxidase, oxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and hydrolase). Finally, we look forward to the opportunities and challenges that MOFs will face in clinical detection, promoting their clinical application transformation.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Classification of MOF nanozymes

2.1 Peroxidase

2.2 Oxidase

2.3 Catalase

2.4 Superoxide dismutase

2.5 Hydrolase

3 Application of MOF nanozymes in clinical detection

3.1 Application of MOF nanozymes in nucleic acid detection

3.2 Application of MOF nanozymes in protein detection

3.3 Application of MOF nanozymes in the detection of small molecule

4 Conclusion and outlook

4.1 Strengthening environmental stability

4.2 Enhancing substrate specificity

4.3 Enhancing the enzymes-like catalytic activity

Cite this article

Wenhao Luo , Rui Yuan , Jinyuan Sun , Lianqun Zhou , Xiaohe Luo , Yang Luo . Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanozymes for Clinical Applications[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2023 , 35(9) : 1389 -1398 . DOI: 10.7536/PC230113

1 Introduction

In living systems, enzymes act as catalysts for most biochemical reactions and are important drivers of human metabolism. Although natural enzymes have high catalytic specificity and adjustable activity, their mutability, high cost and complex preparation greatly limit their application in biomedical and other fields[1~3]. In order to make up for this defect, nanoenzymes, as a new class of artificial enzymes, have emerged, which have the characteristics of simple synthesis, controllable cost, stable and easy storage, strong catalytic performance and easy modification, and show great potential for development[4,5].
metal-organic framework (MOF) is a porous coordination crystal material formed by self-assembly of metal nodes or metal clusters and organic ligands through coordination chemistry.The metal node can be used as the active site in the catalytic reaction, and the organic ligand can be easily functionalized to connect other catalytic substances, which has the characteristics of high porosity, large specific surface area, high loading capacity and homogeneous structure[6,7]. MOF-based nanoenzyme has been developed into a new type of nanoenzyme, which is relatively simple in preparation, more flexible in design, and richer in active sites compared with carbon-based, metal, and transition metal compound nanoenzymes. Therefore, MOF nanoenzymes have stronger catalytic performance than other nanoenzymes, and their easy multi-functionalization features enable more applications, especially in the field of clinical testing[8,9]. In this paper, the main classification of MOF nanoenzymes is introduced, the latest progress in clinical testing is reviewed in detail, and the current challenges and prospects of MOF nanoenzymes in biomedicine are put forward, aiming at exploring the application potential of MOF nanoenzymes and promoting their clinical application.

2 Classification of MOF nanozymes

The catalytic ability of MOF nanoenzyme mainly comes from the following two aspects: on the one hand, the catalytic activity of Fe, Cu, Co, Ni, Ce and other metal ions for redox reaction; On the other hand, it is a natural enzyme-catalyzed reaction process mimicked by special organic ligands (organic ligands act as electron intermediaries to transfer electrons accepted by one substrate to another). According to different enzymatic activities, researchers have developed MOF nanozymes with different enzymatic activities, mainly including peroxidase, oxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase and hydrolase (Table 1)[10].
表1 MOF 纳米酶的主要分类[8,11 ~24]

Table 1 The main classification of MOF nanozymes[8,11 ~24]

Classification Advantages Disadvantages Reaction principle Examples ref
Peroxidase Higher catalytic activity than natural peroxidase, and adjusted active sites The high activity is only in weak acidity condition (pH is about 4). Fenton-like reaction Zr-MOF,Fe-MOF,
Ni-MOF
8,11,12
Oxidase Higher catalytic activity than natural oxidase, and H2O2 is not required for the reaction The selectivity and specificity of substrate are insufficient in
complex samples
Activating O2 to
produce ROS
some Ce-MOF,Co-MOF,Cu-MOF 13~16
Catalase High stability, adjustable enzyme activity, simple preparation, good biocompatibility The high catalytic activity is only at specific pH. Accelerating the
dismutation of H2O2 into water and oxygen
Ce-MOF,Mn-MOF 17~19
Superoxide dismutase Higher stability than natural superoxide dismutase, and high catalytic activity Certain cytotoxicity Disproportionation of
superoxide anion to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide
Cu/Zr-MOF,Sn-MOF 8,20,21
Hydrolase Higher stability than natural hydrolase, wide range of applications, and flexible design The activity of catalyst is easily affected by strong acid and alkali The hydrolysis of the metal nodes and
coordination structures
Zr-MOF,Ce-MOF 8,22~24

2.1 Peroxidase

In recent years, a large number of research reports have confirmed that many MOFs containing Fe redox nodes have peroxidase catalytic function, and their catalytic principle is usually Fenton-like mechanism, that is, hydrogen peroxide reacts with ferrous ions to produce hydroxyl radicals (· OH) with strong oxidizing ability[11,25 ~27]. In addition to iron-based MOF, some other transition-metal-containing MOF, including copper-based, ruthenium-based, nickel-based and zirconium-based, have also been found to have peroxidase catalytic ability[10,28]. These nanoenzymes can oxidize colorless 3,3 ', 5,5' -tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to blue 3,3 ', 5,5' -tetramethylbenzidine diimine oxide (TMBox) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, and then turn yellow in the presence of acid[29~31]. Compared with the natural peroxidase, the MOF nanoenzyme has stronger peroxidase-like activity and higher stability. For example, the Michaelis constant Km of Zr-based MOF nanocomposite (Zr-MOF-PVP) synthesized by Lu et al. For hydrogen peroxide and TMB is about 6 and 14 times lower than that of natural HRP enzyme, while the highest reaction rate is about 14 and 7 times higher than that of HRP enzyme[12].

2.2 Oxidase

In addition to peroxidase activity, many cerium-based, cobalt-based, copper-based MOF nanozymes also show oxidase catalytic activity[32~34]. They can mimic the action of oxidase, activate oxygen in aqueous solution to produce reactive oxygen radicals (ROS), and then catalyze the redox reaction of substrates[34]. At the same time, the MOF nanoenzyme can directly catalyze the oxidation of a substrate (such as TMB) by using dissolved oxygen in the reaction without the participation of hydrogen peroxide, and has the advantages of simple operation and rapid reaction[10]. A series of studies have shown that its enzyme-like activity is much better than that of natural oxidase. For example, Mao et al. Simulated the active catalytic center of natural enzyme and synthesized a spherical porous copper-mimetic oxidase (Cu-MOF) with clear catalytic active center.It has good oxidase-like activity, the Km value of Michaelis-Menten constant is as low as 1.09 mmol/L, and it shows good catalytic activity even at low concentration, and the enzyme activity can be maintained for about one month[13]. At the same time, the nanoenzyme can also produce strong exogenous ROS.

2.3 Catalase

MOF nanoenzymes synthesized from cerium-based, manganese-based and other materials are also often used to mimic catalase activity, as antioxidants to catalyze the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, and also have high affinity and catalytic effects on other ROS[35,36][17,19]. The MOF nanoenzyme has higher catalytic activity and stability than natural catalase. In order to further improve the catalytic activity of MOF nanoenzyme, researchers introduced noble metal nanoparticles into the MOF substrate to form a composite MOF nanoenzyme with high enzymatic activity[37,38]. He et al. Modified AuNPs on the surface of MOF in situ to form hydrogen peroxide nanoenzyme with high catalytic activity, which increased the decomposition ability of hydrogen peroxide by more than 6 times compared with the catalytic ability of AuNPs alone, and had good stability in buffer environment such as phosphate[37].

2.4 Superoxide dismutase

At present, many bimetallic MOF nanoenzymes have been used by a large number of researchers to mimic superoxide dismutase[39,40]. The function of this kind of nanoenzyme is similar to that of natural superoxide dismutase, which can catalyze the dismutation of ROS to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, but it has higher stability and stronger catalytic activity[30,31]. Qu et al. Prepared a Cu-TCPP MOF with superoxide dismutase-like activity, whose size and Cu active site coordination environment are similar to those of native superoxide dismutase, and whose superoxide dismutase activity is higher than that of other nanoenzymes (e.The activity of that MOF nanoenzyme is nearly 10 time higher than that of the CeO2, and is 4 time higher than that of the MnO2 nanoenzyme), the MOF nanoenzyme is closer to the natural superoxide dismutase, and the MOF Nanoenzyme can stably exist in high temperature, various organic solvents and a complex environment in a human body[41].

2.5 Hydrolase

In addition to oxidase activity, cerium-based and zinc-based MOF nanoenzymes have also been shown to have hydrolase-like activity, which can promote the hydrolysis of chemical bonds of the corresponding substrates[42,43]. According to the different substrates, the hydrolase activity of MOF nanoenzyme is mainly divided into three types, namely, organophosphorus hydrolase, protease and esterase[22,44]. For example, Lin et al. Used ZIF-90 to simulate organophosphohydrolase (OPH) to realize the hydrolysis of organophosphorus methyl parathion (MP), the highest reaction rate of which is tens of thousands of times that of natural OPH, and has higher stability and recyclability[45]; The MOF-808 nanoenzyme prepared by Ly et al. Showed high protease activity, especially the model dipeptide (glycine-glycine) hydrolysis effect was excellent, which could completely hydrolyze the peptide bond with a rate constant of 2.69×10-4s-1;Chen.It showed good enzymatic activity toward p-nitrophenylacetate with a Michaelis-Menten constant (Km value) of 3.9 mmol/L and a maximum initial velocity of 317 nm/s, and was easily separated from the system for recycling[24][46].
The above five common MOF nanoenzymes have their own advantages and disadvantages: ① Many peroxidase-like MOF nanoenzymes have higher activity than natural enzymes, but most of them need moderate acidic conditions to exert higher activity; (2) The catalytic activity of MOF nanoenzyme with oxidase-like activity is also high, but the substrate selectivity is insufficient in complex samples; (3) catalase-like MOF has good stability and biocompatibility, but its catalytic activity is greatly affected by pH; (4) The stability of superoxide dismutase and hydrolase MOF nanoenzymes is better than that of natural enzymes, but the former is more cytotoxic and difficult to be used for in vivo analysis, while the biological activity of the latter is easily affected by pH. In addition, many MOF nanozymes can possess two or more enzymatic activities at the same time, which can be used for the analysis of synergistic reactions of multiple enzymes, such as catalytic cascade reactions.

3 Application of MOF nanoenzyme in clinical detection

MOF nanoenzyme brings new ideas for the detection of clinical biomarkers because of its excellent mimetic enzyme activity, unique selectivity and good stability. MOF nanoenzymes are expected to provide technical support for simple and reliable clinical detection, from the direct detection of substrate molecules by catalyzing specific substrates to the indirect analysis of analytes by using the influence of analytes on their enzymatic activity in the reaction system. A large number of studies have applied MOF nanozymes to the analysis of clinical biomarkers such as nucleic acids, proteins and small molecules[47,48].

3.1 Application of MOF nanoenzyme in nucleic acid detection

Nucleic acid, as a carrier of genetic material, is of great significance in the growth and development of organisms, as well as in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of diseases. The analysis of disease-related nucleic acid markers has become the basis of diagnosis and precise diagnosis and treatment of various diseases[49]. At present, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most widely used nucleic acid detection method in clinical practice, which requires professional operation and precise instruments and equipment. Isothermal amplification techniques (such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification, rolling circle amplification, etc.), as a newly developed detection technique, have high sensitivity, simple operation, and do not require professional analytical instruments[50~53]. These methods can realize the sensitive analysis of nucleic acid, but their common shortcomings are that the experimental process is greatly affected by enzyme activity, and the sensitivity and specificity are insufficient.
As an enzyme-like active substance, the MOF nanoenzyme is less affected by the reaction environment, can realize the sensitive and specific detection of the target nucleic acid through specific functional modification, and has the advantages of simple operation and rapid reaction[14]. Based on this, Kong et al. Encapsulated glucose oxidase (GOx) in ZIF-8 as a nanocarrier, modified DNA strands on its surface to form a three-dimensional Walker, and achieved microRNA-21 (miRNA-21) sensitive electrochemical analysis on ZIF-8 nanocarrier through cascade catalytic reaction, with a minimum detection limit of 29 pmol/L.The implementation of this method provides a new idea for the clinical analysis of miRNA (Figure 1A); Li et al. Synthesized a loose and porous three-layer structure MOF @ Pt @ MOF nanoenzyme, which has a large specific surface area and abundant porosity, and its efficient catalytic performance and cascade primer exchange reaction can achieve ultrasensitive detection of exosomal miRNA, with a detection limit as low as 0.29 fmol/L[54][55]. Similarly, the researchers used MIL-101, a metal-organic framework with abundant surface area and catalytic sites, excellent hydrothermal and chemical stability, to effectively immobilize G-triad/heme DNase, which has dual peroxidase activity and achieves ultrasensitive detection of miRNA-721 with a detection limit as low as 0.25 fmol/L[56].
图1 MOF纳米酶在核酸检测中的应用。(A)ZIF-8纳米酶触发级联催化反应,实现miRNA-21灵敏检测[54];(B)MOF级联核酸电路用于准确、灵敏地检测血清循环miRNA[57];(C)新型多功能铁基金属有机框架(PdNPs@Fe-MOFs)用于药物性肝损伤标记物miRNA-122超敏检测[58];(D)基于MOF纳米酶的miRNA流动均相电化学检测系统[59]

Fig.1 Application of MOF nanozymes in nucleic acid detection.(A)ZIF-8 nanozymes triggered cascade catalytic reaction for miRNA-21 detection[54];(B)MOF cascade nucleic acid circuit for circulating miRNA analyzing in serum[57];(C)multifunctional iron-based metal-organic framework (PdNPs@Fe-MOFs) for miRNA-122 identification[58];(D)MOF nanozymes assisted homogeneous electrochemical system for miRNA discrimination[59]

In order to further improve the detection sensitivity and effectively realize the early monitoring of diseases, Zhang et al. Developed a dual-signal mode based on the luminescent metal-organic framework coupled cascade nucleic acid circuit by using the photophysical effect of luminescent MOF and its own multi-active site characteristics.Effectively normalizing the interference of environmental factors to achieve accurate and sensitive analysis of serum circulating miRNA solves the challenge of low abundance detection of circulating miRNA in peripheral blood (Figure 1B)[57]. Meanwhile, Wang et al. Assembled palladium nanoparticles on the surface of the previously synthesized Fe-MIL-88NH2MOF microcrystals to prepare a novel multifunctional MOF (PdNPs @ Fe-MOF). Compared with the previously synthesized MOF, the prepared MOF has a large specific surface area and multiple active sites, and the enzyme activity can be enhanced by using the synergistic effect between PdNPs and Fe-MOF, which can detect miRNA-122 at a concentration as low as 3×10-3fmol/L in serum samples (Figure 1C)[58].
Although a series of nucleic acid analysis technologies based on MOF nanoenzymes have improved the sensitivity of traditional analysis methods, the stability of MOF materials is insufficient. In order to solve this problem, Han et al. Prepared an ultrathin (only 1 nm) two-dimensional MOF nanoenzyme, which has a larger surface area and more accessible active sites than the traditional three-dimensional MOF nanoenzyme, and has a smaller diffusion barrier for substrate molecules, thus improving the stability of detection[59]. At the same time, the MOF-modified electrode can be regenerated by flowing target molecules and phosphate buffer, which can achieve continuous monitoring of target molecules (Figure 1 D).
Nucleic acid detection based on MOF nanoenzyme is a great progress in nucleic acid molecular detection technology, which helps to achieve more sensitive, accurate and convenient nucleic acid detection, but the enzyme-like catalytic activity of MOF nanoenzyme limits its practical application. Enhancing the catalytic activity of MOF nanoenzymes by increasing the specific surface area, modifying the spatial structure or doping other metal materials is an important direction worthy of further study.

3.2 Application of MOF nanoenzyme in protein detection

The change of protein level in organism is often used as an objective evaluation basis for disease development, and is an important reference object for disease prediction, diagnosis and treatment. At present, protein analysis is usually based on antigen-antibody reaction, mainly including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, etc. These methods are cumbersome, time-consuming, dependent on the substrate of enzyme-catalyzed reaction, and lack of sensitivity and specificity[60,61]. MOF nanoenzyme overcomes the limitations of natural enzymatic reaction to a great extent because of its high reaction rate and catalytic performance.
Wang et al. prepared peroxidase-like catalytic active Fe-MIL-88 A (ion-based MOF material) for TMB catalysis, and achieved rapid analysis of thrombin within 10 min, with a minimum detection limit of 0.8 nmol/L observed by naked eyes (Fig. 2A)[62]; Furthermore, Jiang et al. Synthesized a highly catalytic catechol-oxidizing nanoenzyme MOF-818 on the surface of carbon cloth fiber in situ by hydrothermal method, and used the surface modified functional aptamer to achieve ultrasensitive analysis of thrombin, which was at least two orders of magnitude higher than the reported analysis strategy (detection limit of 6.4 pmol/L) (Fig. 2B)[63]; At the same time, Jiang et al. Modified a platinum-coordinated titanium-based porphyrin metal-organic framework (Ti-MOF-Pt) on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode, and enhanced the analytical ability of thrombin (linear range of 4 pmol/L ~ 0.2 μmol/L, detection limit of 1.3 pmol/L) by taking advantage of the high specific surface area of MOF and the excellent electrochemical properties of platinum, which is superior to most electrochemical and fluorescence analytical techniques[64].
图2 MOF纳米酶在蛋白检测中的应用。(A)过氧化物酶模拟物Fe-MIL-88A用于凝血酶的检测[62];(B)碳布纤维表面合成的MOF-818用于凝血酶的检测[63];(C)模拟过氧化物酶的二维MOF用于碱性磷酸酶测定[68];(D)合成的MIL53(Fe)/G4-氯化血红素用于碱性磷酸酶检测[69]

Fig.2 Application of MOF nanozymes in protein detection. (A)peroxidase mimic Fe-MIL-88A for thrombin detection[62];(B)MOF-818 synthesized with the surface of carbon cloth fiber for the identification of thrombin[63];(C)Peroxidase mimic two-dimensional MOF for Alkaline Phosphatase determination[68];(D)MIL53 (Fe) / G4-hemin for the discrimination of alkaline phosphatase[69]

In order to better demonstrate the excellent analytical performance of MOF nanoenzyme, the researchers also used it for the detection of some protein markers. Zeng et al. Used carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) -specific aptamer-functionalized DNA/AuNPs/MOF complex (peroxidase mimetic activity) for highly sensitive detection of CEA, with a minimum detection limit as low as 0.742 pg/mL; Feng et al. Prepared peroxidase-like active Fe-MIL-88B-NH2 (Fe-MOF) as an immunoprobe.Combined with the electrochemical platform, the analytical sensitivity of prostate specific antigen was improved, and the detection limit was 0. 13 pg/mL; Wang et al used Zr-based MOF as a peroxidase mimic to quantify and identify phosphorylated protein, and the linear detection range was 0. 17-5. 0 mg/mL, and the detection limit was 0. 16 mg/mL[65][66][67]. In addition, Wang et al. Developed a colorimetric method for quantifying ALP activity using 2D-MOF with peroxidase-like activity in combination with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) -catalyzed hydrolysis, and three different phosphates, PPi, ATP, and ADP, were used as inhibitors of peroxidase nanoenzymes.Three different linear detection ranges were achieved, namely, 2.5 – 20 U/L, 5 – 60 U/L, and 50 – 200 U/L. The analytical performance of the method was able to adapt to the detection of samples with different abundances (Fig. 2C)[68]. The above research strategies have effectively utilized the efficient enzyme-like catalytic activity of MOF nanoenzymes, but the sensitivity of these techniques needs to be further improved to better apply to the analysis of clinical samples. Therefore, Mao et al. covalently linked MIL-53 (Fe) MOF with a G-quadruplex forming sequence (F3TC) to couple heme to produce peroxidase-mimetic activity, and achieved ALP detection through a cascade enzymatic reaction with a detection limit of 0.02 U/L, which was successfully used in the analysis of human plasma samples (Figure 2D)[69]. In order to further meet the needs of clinical rapid detection, Zhou et al. Introduced the technology of smart phone to identify the color change. According to the color change caused by Fe/Zn MOF, the RGB value generated by the color reaction was obtained, and the minimum ALP of 0.03 U/L could be identified[70].
MOF nanoenzyme has been widely used in the detection of various protein disease markers, which can not only be used to effectively enrich antigens, but also have stable and controllable properties, and its catalytic activity can be comparable to that of natural enzymes. Combined with specific recognition elements (such as aptamers and antibodies), it can well achieve specific, sensitive and stable detection of protein targets. Improving the enzymatic activity and stability of MOF nanoenzyme will help to enhance its practical application in clinical protein detection.

3.3 Application of MOF nanoenzyme in small molecule detection

In clinical analysis, inorganic compounds, ions, short peptides and other small molecules play an important role in the homeostasis, metabolism, occurrence and development of diseases. The existing methods for the analysis of small molecules are generally detected by atomic absorption spectroscopy, atomic emission spectroscopy, cold vapor, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography and the like, and the methods are often insufficient in specificity or complex in operation, long in detection period and the like[71,72]. Based on this, MOF nanoenzyme can make up for the defects of existing detection methods through functional modification and high catalytic performance.
Blood glucose monitoring, as the main type of clinical small molecule detection, occupies an indispensable position in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Although a large number of glucose sensing devices have been used in clinical practice, the key to diabetes diagnosis and treatment is to continue to explore sensitive, simple and low-cost glucose monitoring strategies. Based on the advantages of MOF nanoenzyme, such as high activity, high specific surface area and rich active sites, researchers have applied it to glucose monitoring[73]. Xu et al. Synthesized a peroxidase-like active Fe-MIL-88B-NH2(Fe based MOF) nanoenzyme to link GOx by amidation coupling reaction, and performed cascade catalytic colorimetric detection of glucose. The detection system (linear range of 1 – 500 μmol/L, detection limit of 0.487 μmol/L) had comparable analytical performance with a blood glucose meter and better repeatability (Fig. 3A)[74]. However, due to the limitation of sensitivity, this kind of method is easy to miss the detection of people with impaired glucose tolerance, so the analysis performance of this kind of sensor needs to be improved. Based on this, Yuan et al. established an ultrasensitive colorimetric glucose biosensing platform using two-dimensional iron-based MOF nanosheets with peroxidase properties for the determination of glucose in people with impaired glucose tolerance or other biological matrices, with a linear range of 0.04 ~ 20 μmol/L and a minimum detection limit as low as 39 nmol/L[27]. During the occurrence and development of diabetes mellitus, not only the increase of blood sugar, but also the increase of other substances in the process of glucose metabolism. Therefore, simultaneous monitoring of multiple target molecules is often required at the same time of blood glucose detection. Wang et al. Introduced H2pydc and EuNO3·6H2O to synthesize peroxidase-active MOF Eu-pydc to establish a dual-target molecular sensor, which could not only detect glucose, but also analyze cysteine, with detection limits of 0.28 μmol/L and 6.9 μmol/L, respectively (Fig. 3B)[75].
图3 MOF纳米酶在小分子检测中的应用。(A)Fe-MOF-Gox 级联催化检测葡萄糖[74];(B)合成的MOF纳米酶用于葡萄糖和半胱氨酸的检测[75];(C)ELISA中引入MOF纳米酶进行催化显色以测定黄曲霉毒素B1[78];(D)高过氧化物酶活性的Hemin@BSA@ZIF-8用于过氧化氢和双酚 A的检测[81]

Fig.3 Application of MOF nanozymes in the Detection of small molecules.(A)Fe-MOF-Gox cascade catalysis for glucose detection[74];(B)MOF nanozymes for the detection of glucose and Cysteine[75];(C)MOF nanozymes for the Determination of aflatoxin B1 in ELISA[78];(D)Hemin@BSA@ZIF-8 for H2O2 and bisphenol Aidentification[81]

In addition to blood glucose monitoring, MOF nanozymes are also widely used in other clinically common small molecule assays. Cui et al. Constructed a cascade catalytic detector (MIL-88B(Fe)-NH2@GLOX) to immobilize glutamate oxidase (GLOX) using Schiff base reaction for glutamate analysis (detection limit of 2.5 μmol/L, linear range of 1 – 100 μmol/L)[76]. Zeng et al. Found that the biomineralized MOF of bovine serum albumin (BSA) could enhance the high catalytic activity of nanoenzyme, so the Bioinorganic hybrid nanoenzyme functionalized by cholesterol oxidase was used to achieve highly sensitive detection of cholesterol in serum samples, with a minimum detection limit of 4.85 μmol/L; Xu et al. Established a new indirect competitive MOF nanoenzyme linked immunosorbent assay.For highly sensitive detection of aflatoxin B1, this method uses functional MOF instead of natural enzyme to catalyze color development, and its detection limit is 0.009 ng/mL. Compared with traditional ELISA, the detection limit of this method is reduced by 20 times, and false positive and false negative results are effectively avoided during the detection process (Figure 3C)[77][78]. While improving the catalytic performance, the specificity of MOF nanoenzyme needs to be enhanced urgently. Wu et al. Coated polydopamine on the surface of MIL-53 (Fe) by self-polymerization, which showed strong anti-interference ability to common ions, amino acids and other substances on the basis of enhancing peroxidase activity and target recognition ability[79]. Wang et al. Combined the flexible structure of MOF materials to construct a catalytic and luminescent dual-function nanoenzyme for 17β-estradiol specificity analysis[80]. In addition to the analysis of single target molecules, Zhu et al. Improved Hemin @ BSA @ ZIF-8 peroxidases and successfully used them for the sensitive detection of various small molecules such as hydrogen peroxide and bisphenol A, broadening the biological application scope of MOF nanozymes (Fig. 3D)[81].
MOF nanoenzyme provides strong support for sensitive and high-throughput detection of glucose, hydrogen peroxide, aflatoxin B1 and other small molecules by its strong stability and uniformly dispersed active sites. Further improving the specific surface area of MOF nanoenzyme and modifying its spatial structure will help it react more fully with small molecules and improve the precision and accuracy of clinical analysis.

4 Conclusion and prospect

MOF nanoenzyme has attracted more and more attention because of its good mimic enzyme activity. In clinical testing, researchers often combine the multifunctional properties of MOF materials with good enzyme-like activity for the analysis of a variety of biomarkers. Although MOF nanoenzyme has made a series of achievements in clinical detection, it still faces great challenges.

4.1 Enhance environmental stability

Increasing the stability of MOF nanozymes in aqueous environment is a major challenge for their clinical detection applications. Because most MOF nanoenzymes are synthesized in organic solvents, their skeleton structure is easily destroyed in the catalytic process in aqueous environment, resulting in great structural instability. In clinical detection, most of the analytical systems are aqueous environment, which is easy to destroy the structure of MOF nanoenzyme and reduce its catalytic function, thus affecting the clinical detection results. Therefore, improving the stability of MOF nanoenzyme in aqueous environment, such as reducing the size of MOF materials or doping metal nanoparticles such as platinum, is conducive to its reuse and application in clinical testing.

4.2 Enhanced substrate specificity

At present, the specificity of MOF nanozymes mainly depends on the interaction between nanozymes and analytes or their functionalized biological recognition elements (antibodies, aptamers, etc.). However, MOF nanoenzyme itself does not have the fine protein structure of natural enzyme, which is easy to cause the recognition element to be unable to exclude the influence of non-target substances to a certain extent, resulting in the limitation of analytical specificity. Strengthening the interaction between the target substance and MOF nanoenzyme is the key to improve the specificity. The construction of nanozymes targeting substrate specificity is an effective way to enhance their detection selectivity. In addition, changing the spatial structure of MOF nanozymes can also solve the problem of selective catalysis of substrates by MOF nanozymes to some extent.

4.3 Promoted enzyme-like catalytic activity

In previous studies, MOF nanoenzymes were difficult to achieve ideal catalytic activity due to their morphological structure and active sites. Although some strategies have been used to improve the enzyme-like catalytic activity, such as the synthesis of 2D-MOF nanosheets to expand the contact area of the active site, the results still fail to meet the needs in clinical testing. On this basis, the emerging single-atom and complex metal (such as bimetallic) MOF nanoenzymes are expected to provide new ideas for the ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids, proteins, and small molecules. However, how to adjust the composition ratio of the composite metal and the monoatomization of the active site while retaining its own excellent structure and performance remains a great challenge.
In view of the above key problems, researchers can take advantage of the easy functionalization of MOF nanomaterials to synthesize monatomic nanomaterials with natural enzyme structure in the follow-up research, which can not only ensure high catalytic activity, but also greatly improve the selectivity of target nucleic acids, proteins or small molecules. The catalytic process of MOF nanoenzyme and the interaction between the catalytic active center and the clinical target were theoretically analyzed by density functional theory calculation, and the relationship between the structure and activity of MOF nanoenzyme was explored to prepare high-performance nanoenzyme. Controlling different reaction conditions (precursor, temperature, etc.) To achieve high-density catalytic active sites, ideal dispersion, stability, etc. Of MOF materials, and improve its clinical applicability. With the progress of nanoscience and the further study of the properties and catalytic mechanism of MOF nano-mimetic enzymes, MOF nano-enzymes with better stability, catalytic activity and selectivity will be further applied.
[1]
Wang Q, Astruc D. Chem. Rev., 2020, 120(2): 1438.

[2]
Arcus V L, van der Kamp M W, Pudney C R, Mulholland A J. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 2020, 65: 96.

[3]
Zhang Y, Ge J, Liu Z. ACS Catal., 2015, 5(8): 4503.

[4]
Liang M, Yan X. Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52(8): 2190.

[5]
Ren X, Chen D, Wang Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Chen H, Li X, Huo M. J. Nanobiotechnology, 2022, 20(1): 92.

[6]
Wang S, McGuirk C M, d'Aquino A, Mason J A, Mirkin C A. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(37): 1800202.

[7]
Wang L, Wang K, Wang X, Niu R, Chen X, Zhu Y, Sun Z, Yang J, Liu G, Luo Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15(3): 3826.

[8]
Niu X, Li X, Lyu Z, Pan J, Ding S, Ruan X, Zhu W, Du D, Lin Y. Chem. Comm., 2020, 56(77): 11338.

[9]
Wang D, Jana D, Zhao Y. Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53(7): 1389.

[10]
Huang X, Zhang S, Tang Y, Zhang X, Bai Y, Pang H. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2021, 449: 214216.

[11]
Shu Y, Ye Q, Tan J, Lv H, Liu Z, Mo Q. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2022, 5(12): 17909.

[12]
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zeng M, Zhao Y, Zuo X, Meng F, Lv F, Lu Y. Environ. Res., 2022, 203: 111818.

[13]
Mao Z, Chen J, Wang Y, Xia J, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhu H, Hu X, Chen H. Nanoscale, 2022, 14(26): 9474.

[14]
Zandieh M, Liu J. Langmuir, 2022, 38(12): 3617.

[15]
Xia Y, Zhou J, Liu Y, Liu Y, Huang K, Yu H, Jiang X, Xiong X. Analyst, 2022, 147(23): 5355.

[16]
Han M, Ren M, Li Z, Qu L, Yu L. New J. Chem., 2022, 46(22): 10682.

[17]
Jiang D, Ni D, Rosenkrans Z T, Huang P, Yan X, Cai W. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48(14): 3683.

[18]
Xu D, Wu L, Yao H, Zhao L. Small, 2022, 18(37): 2203400.

[19]
Wang D, Zhao Y. Chem, 2021, 7(10): 2635.

[20]
Li L, Li H, Shi L, Shi L, Li T. Langmuir, 2022, 38(23): 7272.

[21]
Wu T, Huang S, Yang H, Ye N, Tong L, Chen G, Zhou Q, Ouyang G. ACS Mater. Lett., 2022, 4(4): 751.

[22]
Li S, Zhou Z, Tie Z, Wang B, Ye M, Du L, Cui R, Liu W, Wan C, Liu Q, Zhao S, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Zhang H, Du Y, Wei H. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13(1): 827.

[23]
Dai S, Simms C, Dovgaliuk I, Patriarche G, Tissot A, Parac-Vogt T N, Serre C. Chem. Mater., 2021, 33(17): 7057.

[24]
Ly H G T, Fu G, Kondinski A, Bueken B, De Vos D, Parac-Vogt T N. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(20): 6325.

[25]
Thakur B, Karve V V, Sun D T, Semrau A L, Weiß L J K, Grob L, Fischer R A, Queen W L, Wolfrum B. Adv. Mater. Technol., 2021, 6(5): 2001048.

[26]
Liu X, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sun Y, Ren J, Qu X. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(5): 5222.

[27]
Yuan A, Lu Y, Zhang X, Chen Q, Huang Y. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8(40): 9295.

[28]
Yang J, Dai H, Sun Y, Wang L, Qin G, Zhou J, Chen Q, Sun G. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2022, 414(9): 2971.

[29]
Cheng X, Zhou X, Zheng Z, Kuang Q. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 430: 133079.

[30]
Lee J, Liao H, Wang Q, Han J, Han J H, Shin H E, Ge M, Park W, Li F. Exploration, 2022, 2(1): 20210086.

[31]
Mou X, Wu Q, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhang C, Chen X, Fan K, Liu H. Small Methods, 2022, 6(11): 2200997.

[32]
Kandathil V, Patil S A. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 294: 102485.

[33]
Loosen A, Simms C, Smolders S, De Vos D E, Parac-Vogt T N. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4(6): 5748.

[34]
Wang F, Chen L, Liu D, Ma W, Dramou P, He H. Trends Analyt. Chem., 2020, 133: 116080.

[35]
Chen G, Yu Y, Fu X, Wang G, Wang Z, Wu X, Ren J, Zhao Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 607(2): 1382.

[36]
Abdelhamid H N, Sharmoukh W. Microchem. J., 2021, 163: 105873.

[37]
He Z, Huang X, Wang C, Li X, Liu Y, Zhou Z, Wang S, Zhang F, Wang Z, Jacobson O, Zhu J J, Yu G, Dai Y, Chen X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(26): 8752.

[38]
Liu Y, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Zhou M, Yu Y, Lin S, Jiang B, Zhao X, Miao L, Wei C W, Liu Q, Lin Y W, Du Y, Butch C J, Wei H. Sci. Adv., 2020, 6(29): eabb2695.

[39]
Lewandowski Ł, Kepinska M, Milnerowicz H. Eur. J. Clin. Invest., 2019, 49(1): e13036.

[40]
Zhang X, Li G, Chen G, Wu D, Wu Y, James T D. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31(50): 2106139.

[41]
Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Cao F, Sang Y, Dong K, Pu F, Ren J, Qu X. Mater. Horizons, 2019, 6(8): 1682.

[42]
Dou Y, Yang L, Qin L, Dong Y, Zhou Z, Zhang D. J. Solid State Chem., 2021, 293: 121820.

[43]
Fan C, Tang Y, Wang H, Huang Y, Xu F, Yang Y, Huang Y, Rong W, Lin Y. Nanoscale, 2022, 14(22): 7985.

[44]
Liu J, Liang J, Xue J, Liang K. Small, 2021, 17(32): 2100300.

[45]
Fu T, Xu C, Guo R, Lin C, Huang Y, Tang Y, Wang H, Zhou Q, Lin Y. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4(4): 3345.

[46]
Chen J, Huang L, Wang Q, Wu W, Zhang H, Fang Y, Dong S. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(13): 5960.

[47]
Li S, Liu X, Chai H, Huang Y. Trends Analyt. Chem., 2018, 105: 391.

[48]
Wang X, Wang Y, Ying Y. Trends Analyt. Chem., 2021, 143: 116395.

[49]
Chen X, Jia M, Liu L, Qiu X, Zhang H, Yu X, Gu W, Qing G, Li Q, Hu X, Wang R, Zhao X, Zhang L, Wang X, Durkan C, Wang N, Wang G, Luo Y. Small, 2020, 16(40): 2002800.

[50]
Boonbanjong P, Treerattrakoon K, Waiwinya W, Pitikultham P, Japrung D. Biosensors, 2022, 12(9): 677.

[51]
Wei Z, Wang X, Feng H, Ji F, Bai D, Dong X, Huang W. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2022: 1.

[52]
Bao J, Qiu X, Wang D, Yang H, Zhao J, Qi Y, Zhang L, Chen X, Yang M, Gu W, Huo D, Luo Y, Hou C. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31(14): 2006521.

[53]
Zhao X, Zhang L, Gao W, Yu X, Gu W, Fu W, Luo Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(32): 35958.

[54]
Kong L, Lv S, Qiao Z, Yan Y, Zhang J, Bi S. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2022, 207: 114188.

[55]
Li X, Li X, Li D, Zhao M, Wu H, Shen B, Liu P, Ding S. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2020, 168: 112554.

[56]
Li Y, Zhang C, He Y, Gao J, Li W, Cheng L, Sun F, Xia P, Wang Q. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2022, 203: 114051.

[57]
Zhang S, Xu S, Li X, Ma R, Cheng G, Xue Q, Wang H. Chem. Comm., 2020, 56(31): 4288.

[58]
Li Y, Yu C, Yang B, Liu Z, Xia P, Wang Q. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2018, 102: 307.

[59]
Wang Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Han L. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2022, 206: 114120.

[60]
Yadav S, Kashaninejad N, Masud M K, Yamauchi Y, Nguyen N T, Shiddiky M J A. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2019, 139: 111315.

[61]
Ma Y, Song M, Li L, Lao X, Wong M C, Hao J. Exploration, 2022, 2(6): 20210216.

[62]
Wang Y, Zhu Y, Binyam A, Liu M, Wu Y, Li F. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2016, 86: 432.

[63]
Jiang J, Wang Y, Kan X. Microchem. J., 2022, 172: 106965.

[64]
Jiang J, Cai Q, Deng M. Front. Chem., 2022, 9: 1194.

[65]
Zeng Y, Wang M, Sun Z, Sha L, Yang J, Li G. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2022, 10(3): 450.

[66]
Feng J, Wang H, Ma Z. Microchim. Acta, 2020, 187(1): 95.

[67]
Wang L, Hu Z, Wu S, Pan J, Xu X, Niu X J A C A. Anal. Chim. Acta., 2020, 1121: 26.

[68]
Wang X, Jiang X, Wei H. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8(31): 6905.

[69]
Mao X, He F, Qiu D, Wei S, Luo R, Chen Y, Zhang X, Lei J, Monchaud D, Mergny J L, Ju H, Zhou J. Anal. Chem., 2022, 94(20): 7295.

[70]
Zhou X, Wang M, Wang M, Su X. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2021, 4(8): 7888.

[71]
Evans E H, Pisonero J, Smith C M M, Taylor R N. J. Anal. At Spectrom., 2020, 35(5): 830.

[72]
Vargas Medina D A, Pereira dos Santos N G, da Silva Burato J S, Borsatto J V B, Lanças F M. J. Chromatogr. A, 2021, 1641: 461989.

[73]
Adeel M, Asif K, Rahman M M, Daniele S, Canzonieri V, Rizzolio F. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31(52): 2106023.

[74]
Xu W, Jiao L, Yan H, Wu Y, Chen L, Gu W, Du D, Lin Y, Zhu C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(25): 22096.

[75]
Wang L, Ling Y, Han L, Zhou J, Sun Z, Li N B, Luo H Q. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2020, 1131: 118.

[76]
Hu H, Li P, Wang Z, Du Y, Kuang G, Feng Y, Jia S, Cui J. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2022, 70(12): 3785.

[77]
Zeng X, Yan S, Liu B F. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2022, 335: 111826.

[78]
Xu Z, Long L L, Chen Y Q, Chen M L, Cheng Y H. Food Chem., 2021, 338: 128039.

[79]
Zhang Z, Liu Y, Huang P, Wu F Y, Ma L. Talanta, 2021, 232: 122411.

[80]
Wang L, Chen Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(7): 8351.

[81]
Zhu N, Liu C, Liu R, Niu X, Xiong D, Wang K, Yin D, Zhang Z. Anal. Chem., 2022, 94(11): 4821.

Outlines

/