Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Nanocarbon Molecules — the Fascination of Synthetic Chemistry

  • Jianfeng Yan 1 ,
  • Jindong Xu 1 ,
  • Ruiying Zhang 1 ,
  • Pin Zhou 2 ,
  • Yaofeng Yuan , 1, * ,
  • Yuanming Li , 1, *
Expand
  • 1 College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
  • 2 College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
* Corresponding author e-mail: (Yaofeng Yuan);
(Yuanming Li)

Received date: 2022-09-29

  Revised date: 2023-02-28

  Online published: 2023-03-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(22071025)

Abstract

The discovery and creation of new carbon materials have motivated the evolution of technology. Carbon is one of the central elements, due to the characteristics of carbon atoms and varying electron configurations, diverse molecules will be discovered and formed. The structures and arrangements of carbon atoms in molecules have a significant impact on their properties. Nanocarbon molecules, as novel carbon materials with excellent properties, have found promising applications in nanotechnology, electronics, optics, and biomedical fields. In the past four decades, the discovery and creation of new variety of nanocarbon materials have opened up a new path to advanced science and technology. This paper focuses on the study of the structural characteristics of nanocarbon molecules with novel topological structures, and the way to achieve full synthetic control over these structures that are reported in recent years.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Graphene nanoribbons

3 Negatively Curved Nanocarbons

4 carbon nanorings and Carbon nanobelts

4.1 Synthesis of carbon nanorings

4.2 Synthesis of carbon nanobelts

5 Other structures

6 Conclusion and perspectives

Cite this article

Jianfeng Yan , Jindong Xu , Ruiying Zhang , Pin Zhou , Yaofeng Yuan , Yuanming Li . Nanocarbon Molecules — the Fascination of Synthetic Chemistry[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2023 , 35(5) : 699 -708 . DOI: 10.7536/PC220933

1 Introduction

Carbon is one of the important basic elements in nature, and carbon materials with carbon as the main constituent element play an irreplaceable role in human society. The synthesis of new carbon materials and the study of their properties have greatly promoted the development of science. Especially in the past four decades, the discovery and application of new carbon materials such as fullerene (1985), carbon nanotube (1991), graphene (2004) and graphyne (2010) have made great progress in the fields of optoelectronics, information and energy (Figure 1)[1,2][3,4][5]. In view of the significant contribution of this new class of nanocarbon materials to the development of science, the discovery of fullerene and graphene won the Nobel Prize in 1996 and 2010, respectively. However, most carbon materials obtained by physical synthesis, such as graphene and carbon nanotubes, still have differences in length, width, and even chemical structure between their molecules, and there is no reliable and convenient separation method to purify them[6]. Therefore, scientists have set their sights on the means of synthetic chemistry. Based on the "bottom-up" organic synthesis pathway, nano-carbon molecules with precise structure are gradually constructed and used as template molecules. The precise construction of carbon materials is achieved by developing the expansion reaction of the conjugated system of template molecules (Fig. 7). Among them, nanocarbon molecules are conjugated structures with nanometer size and atomic-level accuracy, mainly composed of sp2 carbon atoms. The synthesis of nanocarbon molecules with novel topologies is very challenging research. By designing and adjusting the molecular structure of nanocarbon, a clear structure-activity relationship can be obtained, and then its physical and chemical properties can be regulated, which will also strongly promote the development of new carbon materials[7,8]. As one of the most promising new carbon materials in the future, carbon nanomaterials have made rapid progress in this field in recent years[9]. Especially in the last fifteen years, organic synthesis techniques have achieved important applications in this field. In this paper, from the perspective of the structure and synthesis of carbon nanomolecules, the latest research progress of carbon nanomolecules will be introduced from four parts: carbon nanoribbons, negative curvature carbon nanorods, cyclic carbon nanorods and other structures.
图1 近年来碳材料家族的发展

Fig. 1 The recent development of the carbon materials

2 Carbon nanoribbon

Graphene is a two-dimensional material with the thickness of a single layer of carbon atoms, which is based on a hexagonal honeycomb lattice formed by carbon atoms with sp2 hybrid orbitals, while carbon Nanoribbons (GNRs) are Graphene carbon nanoribbons with a width of less than 10 nm, which is a new type of carbon nanomaterials with quasi-one-dimensional structure[10,11]. GNRs synthesized precisely at the atomic level have special electronic structure, magnetic edge state and carrier transport properties. The research results on their synthesis methods and physical properties have been published in Science and other journals for many times, and have attracted wide attention from scientists in various fields around the world[12~14].
GNRs can be divided into zigzag-edge, armchair-edge, cove-edge and gulf-edge according to their length, direction and edge structure (Fig. 2), and these edge types are also one of the main factors determining the properties of GNRs. Calculations made by early scientists based on the tight-binding approximation model predicted that the zigzag type had metallic bond properties. The armchair type has metallic bonding properties or semiconducting properties, and its specific properties depend on the bandwidth of the nanoribbon[13]. The edge configuration of GNRs not only affects their electrical, magnetic and chemical properties, but also their width and number of layers[15,16].
图2 不同类型的碳纳米条带

Fig. 2 Different types of graphene nanoribbons

At present, there are two main strategies for the preparation of GNRs: "top-down" (etching graphene or shearing and exfoliating carbon nanotubes) and "bottom-up" (building from molecular modules by organic synthesis and chemical vapor deposition)[17]. The "top-down" approach does not allow precise control of the molecular structure, which in turn leads to uncertainty in the width and edge structure of GNRs. In order to precisely control the physical and chemical properties of GNRs, the "bottom-up" organic synthesis strategy can be used to control their structures to atomic level accuracy, and then to realize the synthesis of GNRs with specific widths and edge structures. Many simple and efficient strategies for organic synthesis have been developed in the past two decades. For example, monomers with substituents or defined edge structures are generally designed first, and then linear polymer precursors are prepared through coupling reactions such as Yamamoto or Suzuki-Miyaura. Finally, GNRs with various sizes, symmetries and edge structures were synthesized by intramolecular-based oxidative dehydrocyclization (Scholl reaction). In 2008, M Müllen et al. Used 1,4-diiodo-2,3,5,6-tetraphenylbenzene and hexaphenylbenzene diborate as monomers to obtain polymer precursors through Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction, and then used FeCl3 as an oxidant to realize the intramolecular oxidative dehydrocyclization of the polymer precursors, pioneering the synthesis of armchair GNRs (Fig. 3)[18]. In 2012, they reported the synthesis of GNRs based on Yamamoto coupling reaction, and obtained laterally extended GNRs with absorption range extending to the near-infrared (NIR) region (Fig. 4)[19]. There are still some problems to be solved in the organic synthesis of GNRs, such as the complexity of the synthesis of GNRs precursors, the solubility of GNRs and the structural defects caused by the side reactions in the Scholl reaction.
图3 通过Suzuki-Miyaura偶联“自下而上”液相合成GNRs[18]

Fig. 3 The bottom-up synthesis of GNR by solution-phase polymerization via Suzuki-Miyaura coupling[18]

图4 通过Yamamoto偶联“自下而上”液相合成GNRs[19]

Fig. 4 The synthesis of a chiral-type GNR via Yamamoto coupling[19]

3 Nanographene with negative curvature

Allotropes made entirely of carbon atoms hybridized with sp2 can exhibit different surface structures, either lying flat like a carpet or bending like a bowl or saddle. The curvature of this surface reflects the overall geometric properties of the nanocarbon structure. Among them, "graphene composed entirely of hexagonal carbon skeleton is a flat surface with zero curvature;" Fullerenes built from hexagonal and pentagonal carbon skeletons are closed spherical structures with positive curvature. The introduction of heptagonal or octagonal carbon skeletons into the hexagonal network results in a saddle-shaped surface with "negative" curvature[20]. Mackay crystal is the first three-dimensional periodic carbon structure with negative curvature (Fig. 5), which has been challenged by synthetic scientists as a new carbon allotrope[21]. At present, the exploration of Makai crystal synthesis is mainly based on the "bottom-up" strategy, which introduces seven-membered or eight-membered rings into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to realize the synthesis of nano-graphene fragments with negative curvature, and then uses them as templates to construct Makai crystals.
图5 一种马凯晶体或碳施瓦茨体的晶胞结构[20]

Fig. 5 The cellular structure of a Mackey crystal or a carbon Schwarz body, Copyright 2020, Progress in Chemistry[20]

In the past ten years, remarkable progress has also been made in the synthesis of nanographene with negative curvature, in which Miao Qian et al., Itami et al., Wu Yaoting et al[22~24][25,26][27][28][29]. Miao Qian et al. Have made detailed reviews focusing on negative curvature nanographene containing seven-membered rings and eight-membered rings respectively[30][20]. Here, we briefly introduce the relevant synthesis strategies with emphasis on synthesis.
The synthetic idea of negative curvature nanographene is mainly to fuse more benzene rings or larger aromatic structures on the periphery of the basic structural unit, which is mainly composed of condensed aromatic hydrocarbons with seven-membered rings or eight-membered rings. In 2018, Miao Qian et al. Reported a saddle-shaped nanocarbon composed of 86 sp2 carbon atoms (Figure 6A)[23]. They first used a condensed ring containing a seven-membered ring as the basic unit, and then extended the carbon skeleton through Diels-Alder reaction and Scholl reaction. Crystal diffraction analysis shows that the naphthalene moiety of the molecular core has a bend of up to 77.2 °, which is significantly higher than the 42.5 ° bend observed in the naphthalene moiety of the C60. In 2019, Miao Qian et al. Carried out Diels-Alder cycloaddition reaction with 1,3-diarylbenzofuran by using fused ring containing eight-membered ring (containing naphthalenediyne) as basic unit, and then successfully obtained saddle-shaped polycyclic skeleton by aromatization (Fig. 6B)[22]. The above two typical synthetic strategies are to start from the basic structural unit containing a seven-membered ring or an eight-membered ring, and then use the in-out strategy to "stitch" the benzene ring outside the basic structural unit, so as to obtain the negative curvature graphene.
图6 负曲率的纳米石墨烯的合成策略[22,23,31]

Fig. 6 Strategies for the synthesis of nanographene with negative curvature[22,23,31]

in addition, there is another ingenious synthesis strategy of negative curvature nanographene, namely the out-in strategy, which is to synthesize macrocycles first, and then realize the construction of seven-membered or eight-membered ring cores in the final synthesis step. In 2017, Miao Qian et al. Cleverly used the strategy of inward cyclization to synthesize [8] cycloalkene derivatives composed of 96 sp2 carbon atoms[31]. The precursor macrocycle with a hexaarylbenzene moiety is formed by two Diels-Alder reactions of cyclopentadienone with macrocyclic diyne and decarbonylation. Finally, a polycyclic twisted skeleton with an eight-membered ring as the inner core and fused with hexabenzene is formed by cyclization and dehydrogenation via Scholl reaction (fig. 6C).
Negative curvature nanographene usually exhibits higher solubility, larger HOMO-LUMO band gap, higher fluorescence quantum yield and red shift of absorption spectrum than planar nanocarbon with similar size due to its more flexible polycyclic skeleton[32]. In view of this, the study of negative curvature nanographene will certainly become an important part of the development of new nanocarbon materials. Of course, the development of more efficient and universal synthesis strategies is also a major challenge for the synthesis of nanographene with negative curvature.

4 Carbon nanorings and carbon nanoribbons

Carbon Nanorings (CNRs) and Carbon Nanobelts (CNBs), as the ring structural units of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), can be used as template molecules to control the precise synthesis of CNTs[33]. In the past 15 years, carbon nanorings and carbon nanoribbons have also been precisely synthesized by means of organic synthesis, laying the foundation for the precise synthesis of carbon nanotubes[34].

4.1 Precise Synthesis of Carbon Nanorings

Carbon nanorings, namely Cycloparaphenylenes (CPPs), as the smallest structural unit of carbon nanotubes, are cyclic structures formed by multiple benzene rings directly connected at the para position of adjacent benzene rings through carbon-carbon single bonds (as shown in Figure 7A). Because of its unique radial conjugation structure, it has attracted the interest of researchers in many fields such as synthetic chemistry, supramolecular chemistry and materials science. After nearly 90 years of continuous exploration and attempt, it has not made a significant breakthrough because its synthesis needs to overcome the great ring tension[35]. In 2008, Bertozzi and Jasti et al. Successfully synthesized [9], [12] and [18] CPPs for the first time[36]. They used benzene ring-substituted cyclohexadiene derivatives to form low-strain cyclic precursors through a multi-step coupling reaction, and then obtained the corresponding carbon nanorings by reductive aromatization of the cyclohexadiene motif in the precursor macrocycle. The cyclohexadiene motif acts as a stress buffer during the reaction, thus overcoming the difficulty in its synthesis. Subsequently, Itami et al. Selectively synthesized [12] CPP by a similar synthetic strategy[37]. They used derivatives of cis-1,4-diphenylcyclohexane as stress buffer units to construct cyclic precursors, and then obtained the corresponding CPPs by oxidative aromatization of the cyclohexane moiety. In 2010, Yamago et al., on the basis of their predecessors, synthesized a low-tension rigid metal precursor macrocycle based on the synthetic strategy of platinum complexes, and then selectively synthesized [8] CPP by reductive elimination[38][39]. The synthesis methods explored by the above three research groups have been widely used in the selective synthesis of various CPPs, making a qualitative leap in the development process of CPPs synthesis. Since then, researchers have successfully prepared CPPs of different sizes and types by using the synthesis methods of these three groups, which has laid a solid foundation for the subsequent synthesis of other carbon nanorings with novel structures.
图7 以碳纳米环和碳纳米环带为模板合成碳纳米管[7]

Fig. 7 The synthesis of GNTs by “growth-from-template” approach[7]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society

图8 代表性的碳纳米环分子的合成[36~38]

Fig. 8 The representative synthesis of CPPs[36~38]

With the development of the above synthetic strategies, the research on the precise synthesis of nanocarbon molecules has entered the fast lane of development, and more and more nanocarbon molecules with interesting and novel structures have been synthesized. Over the past decade, scientists have achieved precise synthesis of carbon nanomolecules with different topologies. Examples with benzene ring as the main building unit include perfluorocarbon nanorings, macroconjugated carbon nanorings, carbon nanocages, benzene nanotubes, perphenylene cyclanes, perphenylene trefoil knots, 8-shaped carbon nanorings and carbon nanobicycls (Fig. 9), among which Chinese scientists have also made extremely important contributions[40][41][42][43][44][44][45][46]. Du Pingwu et al. Successfully embedded polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as side walls into carbon nanorings, and realized the synthesis of hexabenzomyxyl carbon nanorings[41]. The compound and the fullerene C60 construct a supermolecule heterojunction, which provides a solid experimental basis for the application of the compound in the aspect of photoelectric devices[47]. Taking advantage of the reversibility of the photochemical anthracene [4 + 4] dimerization reaction, Cong Huan et al. Originally developed the anthracene photodimerization-depolymerization synthesis strategy, which further enriched the synthesis method of high-tension carbon nanorings[45].
图9 近年来基于苯环单元的一些代表性纳米碳分子[40~46]

Fig. 9 Some representative nanocarbon molecules based on benzene rings[40~46]

4.2 Precise synthesis of carbon nanoribbons

Compared with carbon nanorings, carbon nanoribbons, as a structure with closed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon system, need to cut off at least two carbon-carbon single bonds to open its ribbon structure. Carbon nanoribbons can be divided into three types according to the chirality indices (n, m) of carbon nanotubes: armchair (n = m), chiral (n > m > 0), and zigzag (n = 0) (fig. 7). Similar to carbon nanorings, the successful synthesis of carbon nanoribbons also needs to solve the problem of high tension caused by macrocyclization and ring formation. In 2017, Itami et al. achieved the synthesis of the first armchair CNB (Fig. 10) by iterative Wittig reaction and nickel-catalyzed aryl-aryl coupling reaction using simple p-xylene as precursor[48].
图10 碳纳米环带的合成[48~52]

Fig. 10 The synthesis of CNBs[48~52]

Subsequently, Miao Qian et al. Of the Chinese University of Hong Kong realized the oxidative dehydrocyclization reaction of polyaryl carbon nanorings through ingenious substrate design, and obtained chiral CNB[49]. In this strategy, the key to the successful transformation lies in the use of large carbon nanorings as precursors to reduce the ring strain of the resulting carbon nanoribbons and the enhancement of the oxidative dehydrocyclization activity by alkoxy substituents. Recently, Itami et al. Have also successfully realized the synthesis of zigzag [18,0] CNB through iterative Diels-Alder reaction and reductive arylation of oxo-bridged structure[50]. At the same time, Chi Chunyan et al. Of the National University of Singapore also achieved a more challenging synthesis of [12,0] CNB with greater ring tension through a similar synthesis strategy[51]. In addition, Wang Meixiang et al. Found a new way to establish and develop a new strategy of "building a bridge across the bay", that is, using the ring structure of macrocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, then modifying the appropriate reaction group at the "bay" site on the macrocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and finally using multiple intramolecular reactions to achieve efficient construction of ribbon molecules with different types of skeletons[52]. They used this strategy to obtain hydrogenated zigzag carbon nanoribbon structures with different substituents through trifluoromethanesulfonylation, Suzuki coupling reaction and intramolecular "one-pot" quadruple Friedel-Crafts alkylation. During the oxidative aromatization of the hydrogenated carbon nanoribbon molecule with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ) reagent, the resulting zigzag carbon nanoribbon molecule is unstable and further undergoes a [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction with DDQ in the system. Although they failed to separate the product under conventional experimental conditions, the molecular ion peak of the zigzag carbon nanoribbon was monitored under MALDI mass spectrometry conditions, which was the first time that the signal of the zigzag carbon nanoribbon molecule was observed[53]. These achievements give full play to the creativity of synthetic chemistry and have important academic value in basic research. This kind of molecule can also be used as a template molecule, which lays a solid foundation for the subsequent precise synthesis of carbon nanotubes.
In addition, carbon nanoribbons with other topologies have been continuously synthesized (Fig. 11). In 2020, Wang Meixiang et al. Realized the synthesis of carbon nanoribbons with alternating six-membered and seven-membered carbon rings by using Kou Lei Suo aromatic hydrocarbon. This fused new type of cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon provides a unique truncated cone structure and cavity, which provides a new macrocyclic host molecule for supramolecular chemistry. More importantly, this structure and its derivatives can be used as connection points to prepare carbon nanotubes with heterojunctions[52]. In the same year, Itami et al. Efficiently realized the synthesis of carbon nanoribbons with alternating five- and six-membered carbon rings through a three-step reaction by using pillararene as an easily prepared tensionless macrocycle, which can be regarded as ribbon-like fragments of unconventional carbon nanotubes[54,55]. Twisted carbon nanoribbons can exhibit persistent chiral properties, which can further broaden the application fields of materials. In 2021, Wu Jishan et al. Reported the synthesis of twisted carbon nanoribbons and their chiral resolution, and they confirmed their twisted structure by X-ray crystallographic analysis[56]. In addition to this, the Möbius carbon nanoribbon has been a dream molecule for the scientific community in recent years. In 2022, Itami et al. Successfully overcome its synthesis problem and obtained a carbon nanorin with Mobius band topology[57]. Compared with the normal ribbon topology, the distorted Mbius carbon nanoribbons show completely different characteristics and molecular motions: the distorted part can move rapidly and has chiral properties in solution.
图11 具有其他拓扑结构的碳纳米环带[53,54,56,57]

Fig. 11 The CNBs with other topological structures[53,54,56,57]

5 Other structures

In recent years, carbon nanomolecules with other novel topologies have emerged in an endless stream, such as super helicene, carbon nanocone/bowl, thiacarbon nanoribbon and other structures (Fig. 12)[58][59,60][61]. In 2018, Wang Jiaobing et al. Reported the synthesis and characterization of sextet [7] helicene[58]. In addition to the interesting topology of superhelicene, the synthesis of nanocone topology has also made a major breakthrough, and Xie Suyuan/Zhang Qianyan et al. First synthesized carbon nanocone molecules with well-defined configuration under mild reaction conditions[60]. Tan yuanzhi et al. Constructed carbon nanocone molecules with holes through cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[59]. In addition, nanoribbon molecules doped with heteroatoms have also been successfully synthesized, and Zhu Kelong et al. Reported the synthesis of a series of thiacarbon nanoribbons with thianthrene building blocks[61]. These new nanocarbon molecules have been applied in the fields of optoelectronic materials, supramolecular recognition and living cell imaging technology[62].
图12 其他新颖结构的碳纳米分子[58~61]

Fig.12 Other nanocarbon molecules with novel topological structures[58~61]

6 Conclusion and prospect

This review summarizes the recent developments in the field of nanocarbon molecules with novel topologies. These new nanocarbon molecules exhibit unique physicochemical properties, which are essential for the future development of functional materials in nanotechnology, electronics, optics, and biomedical applications. The emergence of various new nanocarbon molecules has fundamentally changed the scientific landscape and has been regarded as a revolutionary material in the future. Although the field of nanocarbon has made great progress in the past two decades, challenges still exist, and there are still two directions to be solved urgently: obtaining nanocarbon molecules with uniform structure is still a huge challenge in the field of nanocarbon science.The tedious synthesis methods still hinder their large-scale application, and how to accurately and efficiently synthesize the next new nano-carbon molecule with wide influence has always been one of the goals pursued by chemists. In a word, the discovery of various new carbon nanostructures and the study of their unique properties will have very attractive application prospects in materials science, information science, biomedicine and other fields.
[1]
Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A. Science, 2004, 306(5696): 666.

[2]
Xu X J, Qin J G, Li Z. Prog. Chem., 2009, 21(12): 2559.

(徐秀娟, 秦金贵, 李振. 化学进展, 2009, 21(12): 2559.).

[3]
Huang C S, Li Y J, Wang N, Xue Y R, Zuo Z C, Liu H B, Li Y L. Chem. Rev., 2018, 118(16): 7744.

[4]
Shang H, Gu Y, Wang Y B. University Chemistry, 2020, 35: 201.

(商虹, 顾宇, 王英滨. 大学化学, 2020, 35: 201. ).

[5]
Georgakilas V, Perman J A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115(11): 4744.

[6]
Li P, Zhang J. Progress in Chemistry, 2013, 25: 167.

(李盼, 张锦. 化学进展, 2013, 25: 167. ).

[7]
Li Y M, Kono H, Maekawa T, Segawa Y, Yagi A, Itami K. Acc. Mater. Res., 2021, 2(8): 681.

[8]
Majewski M A, Stępień M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(1): 86.

[9]
Itami K, Maekawa T. Nano Lett., 2020, 20(7): 4718.

[10]
Jolly A, Miao D D, Daigle M, Morin J F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59(12): 4624.

[11]
Zheng X Q, Feng M, Zhan H B. Progress in Chemistry, 2012, 24: 2320.

(郑小青, 冯苗, 詹红兵. 化学进展, 2012, 24: 2320. ).

[12]
Kolmer M, Steiner A K, Izydorczyk I, Ko W, Engelund M, Szymonski M, Li A P, Amsharov K. Science, 2020, 369(6503): 571.

[13]
Rizzo D J, Veber G, Jiang J W, McCurdy R, Cao T, Bronner C, Chen T, Louie S G, Fischer F R, Crommie M F. Science, 2020, 369(6511): 1597.

[14]
Cai J M, Ruffieux P, Jaafar R, Bieri M, Braun T, Blankenburg S, Muoth M, Seitsonen A P, Saleh M, Feng X L, Müllen K, Fasel R. Nature, 2010, 466(7305): 470.

[15]
Jia X T, Hofmann M, Meunier V, Sumpter B G, Campos-Delgado J, Romo-Herrera J M, Son H, Hsieh Y P, Reina A, Kong J, Terrones M, Dresselhaus M S. Science, 2009, 323(5922): 1701.

[16]
Jia X T, Campos-Delgado J, Terrones M, Meunier V, Dresselhaus M S. Nanoscale, 2011, 3(1): 86.

[17]
Chen L, Hernandez Y, Feng X L, Müllen K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51(31): 7640.

[18]
Yang X Y, Dou X, Rouhanipour A, Zhi L J, Räder H J, Müllen K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(13): 4216.

[19]
Schwab M G, Narita A, Hernandez Y, Balandina T, Mali K S, De Feyter S, Feng X L, Müllen K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134(44): 18169.

[20]
Miao Q, Yang D Y. Progress in Chemistry, 2020, 32: 1835.

(缪谦, 杨代月. 化学进展, 2020, 32: 1835.).

[21]
Kim K, Lee T, Kwon Y, Seo Y, Song J, Park J K, Lee H, Park J Y, Ihee H, Cho S J, Ryoo R. Nature, 2016, 535(7610): 131.

[22]
Pun S H, Wang Y J, Chu M, Chan C K, Li Y K, Liu Z F, Miao Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(24): 9680.

[23]
Pun S H, Chan C K, Luo J Y, Liu Z F, Miao Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(6): 1581.

[24]
Zhang Y Q, Zhu Y K, Lan D N, Pun S H, Zhou Z, Wei Z, Wang Y, Lee H K, Lin C, Wang J P, Petrukhina M A, Li Q, Miao Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(13): 5231.

[25]
Chaolumen, Stepek I A, Yamada K E, Ito H, Itami K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(44): 23508.

[26]
Kato K, Takaba K, Maki-Yonekura S, Mitoma N, Nakanishi Y, Nishihara T, Hatakeyama T, Kawada T, Hijikata Y, Pirillo J, Scott L T, Yonekura K, Segawa Y, Itami K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(14): 5465.

[27]
Feng C N, Kuo M Y, Wu Y T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52(30): 7791.

[28]
Márquez I R, Fuentes N, Cruz C M, Puente-Muñoz V, Sotorrios L, Marcos M L, Choquesillo-Lazarte D, Biel B, Crovetto L, GÓmez-Bengoa E, Teresa González M, Martin R, Cuerva J M, Campaña A G. Chem. Sci., 2017, 8(2): 1068.

[29]
Qiu Z L, Chen X W, Huang Y D, Wei R J, Chu K S, Zhao X J, Tan Y Z. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed., 2022, 61(18): e202116955.

[30]
Pun S H, Miao Q. Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51(7): 1630.

[31]
Cheung K Y, Chan C K, Liu Z F, Miao Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56(31): 9003.

[32]
González Miera G, Matsubara S, Kono H, Murakami K, Itami K. Chem. Sci., 2022, 13(7): 1848.

[33]
Omachi H, Nakayama T, Takahashi E, Segawa Y, Itami K. Nat. Chem., 2013, 5(7): 572.

[34]
Zhou Q F, Jiang B, Yang H B. Progress in Chemistry, 2018, 30: 628.

(周启峰, 江波, 杨海波. 化学进展, 2018, 30: 628.).

[35]
Parekh V, Guha P. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1934, 11: 95.

[36]
Jasti R, Bhattacharjee J, Neaton J B, Bertozzi C R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(52): 17646.

[37]
Takaba H, Omachi H, Yamamoto Y, Bouffard J, Itami K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48(33): 6112.

[38]
Zhang F, Götz G, Winkler H D, Schalley C, Bäuerle P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48(36): 6632.

[39]
Yamago S, Watanabe Y, Iwamoto T. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed., 2010, 49(4): 644.

[40]
Shudo H, Kuwayama M, Shimasaki M, Nishihara T, Takeda Y, Mitoma N, Kuwabara T, Yagi A, Segawa Y, Itami K. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13: 3713.

[41]
Lu D P, Zhuang G L, Wu H T, Wang S, Yang S F, Du P W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56(1): 158.

[42]
Kayahara E, Iwamoto T, Takaya H, Suzuki T, Fujitsuka M, Majima T, Yasuda N, Matsuyama N, Seki S, Yamago S. Nat. Commun., 2013, 4: 2694.

[43]
Sun Z, Ikemoto K, Fukunaga T M, Koretsune T, Arita R, Sato S, Isobe H. Science, 2019, 363(6423): 151.

[44]
Segawa Y, Kuwayama M, Hijikata Y, Fushimi M, Nishihara T, Pirillo J, Shirasaki J, Kubota N, Itami K. Science, 2019, 365(6450): 272.

[45]
Huang Z A, Chen C, Yang X D, Fan X B, Zhou W, Tung C H, Wu L Z, Cong H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138(35): 11144.

[46]
Li K, Xu Z Q, Deng H, Zhou Z N, Dang Y F, Sun Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(14): 7649.

[47]
Huang Q, Zhuang G L, Jia H X, Qian M M, Cui S S, Yang S F, Du P W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(19): 6244.

[48]
Povie G, Segawa Y, Nishihara T, Miyauchi Y, Itami K. Science, 2017, 356(6334): 172.

[49]
Cheung K Y, Gui S J, Deng C F, Liang H F, Xia Z M, Liu Z F, Chi L F, Miao Q. Chem, 2019, 5(4): 838.

[50]
Cheung K Y, Watanabe K, Segawa Y, Itami K. Nat. Chem., 2021, 13(3): 255.

[51]
Han Y, Dong S Q, Shao J W, Fan W, Chi C Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(5): 2658.

[52]
Zhang Q, Zhang Y E, Tong S, Wang M X. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(3): 1196.

[53]
Shi T H, Guo Q H, Tong S, Wang M X. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(10): 4576.

[54]
Li Y M, Segawa Y, Yagi A, Itami K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(29): 12850.

[55]
Xue B C, Cai W S, Shao X G. Progress in Chemistry, 2008, 20: 1501.

(薛冰纯, 蔡文生, 邵学广. 化学进展, 2008, 20: 1501. ).

[56]
Fan W, Matsuno T, Han Y, Wang X H, Zhou Q F, Isobe H, Wu J S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(39): 15924.

[57]
Segawa Y, Watanabe T, Yamanoue K, Kuwayama M, Watanabe K, Pirillo J, Hijikata Y, Itami K. Nat. Synth, 2022, 1(7): 535.

[58]
Zhu Y P, Xia Z M, Cai Z Y, Yuan Z Y, Jiang N Q, Li T, Wang Y G, Guo X Y, Li Z H, Ma S, Zhong D Y, Li Y, Wang J B. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(12): 4222.

[59]
Hou H, Zhao X J, Tang C, Ju Y Y, Deng Z Y, Wang X R, Feng L B, Lin D H, Hou X, Narita A, Mu¨llen K, Tan Y Z. Nat. Commun., 2020, 11: 3976.

[60]
Zhu Z Z, Chen Z C, Yao Y R, Cui C H, Li S H, Zhao X J, Zhang Q Y, Tian H R, Xu P Y, Xie F F, Xie X M, Tan Y Z, Deng S L, Quimby J M, Scott L T, Xie S Y, Huang R B, Zheng L S. Sci. Adv., 2019, 5(8): eaaw0982.

[61]
Wang S H, Yuan J, Xie J L, Lu Z H, Jiang L, Mu Y X, Huo Y P, Tsuchido Y, Zhu K L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(34): 18443.

[62]
Leonhardt E J, Jasti R. Nat. Rev. Chem., 2019, 3(12): 672.

Outlines

/