Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Morphological Evolution of Atmospheric Black Carbon Particles

  • Kexin Liu 1 ,
  • Zhuofei Du , 2 ,
  • Xin Gong 1 ,
  • Hongjun Mao 1 ,
  • Jianfei Peng , 1
Expand
  • 1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research,College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China
  • 2. College of Environmental Science and Safety Engineering,Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300384,China

Received date: 2024-05-11

  Revised date: 2024-07-20

  Online published: 2024-09-06

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42107125)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(72104132)

Youth Foundation of MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Liberal arts and Social Sciences(21YJCZH136)

Shanxi Province Basic Research Program Foundation(20210302124201)

Abstract

Black carbon (BC) particulate matter has significant light-absorbing capacity and is an important species contributing to haze pollution and global warming. However, quantitative studies of the light absorption capacity of black carbon (BC) have long been unable to reach a consensus affecting the accurate assessment of its environmental and climate effect. The morphological evolution of BC particles is the important factor affecting the light-absorbing capacity. However, the current literature review lacks a comprehensive summary of the characteristics and mechanisms involved in the evolution of BC micromorphology. This review summarizes the relevant studies on BC morphology evolution in recent years including the quantitative parameters of BC morphology, measurement and calculation methods of morphology parameters, the micromorphology evolution characteristics of BC during condensation process, phase separation process, coagulation process and evaporation process, and its evolution mechanism and main influencing factors. The evolution of the microphysical morphology of BC particles during different aging processes is the key to explaining the controversy over the light absorption of BC particles. However, there are still many uncertainties in the morphology evolution of BC core and the quantitative assessment of light absorption of complex-structured BC particles in these processes. Therefore, tracking the actual atmospheric BC morphology evolution, further investigating the effect of morphology evolution mechanism on the BC core collapse, and improving the models of BC light absorption and radiation will be the key research direction in the future.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Quantitative characterization parameters and related measurement instruments for morphology of BC particles

2.1 Quantitative characterization parameters for morphology of BC particles

2.2 Related measurement instruments for morphology of BC particles

3 Morphological evolution characteristics and absorption effect of BC particles during different aging processes

3.1 Condensation process

3.2 Phase separation process

3.3 Coagulation process

3.4 Evaporation process

4 Conclusion and prospect

Cite this article

Kexin Liu , Zhuofei Du , Xin Gong , Hongjun Mao , Jianfei Peng . Morphological Evolution of Atmospheric Black Carbon Particles[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2025 , 37(3) : 397 -410 . DOI: 10.7536/PC240510

1 Introduction

Black Carbon (BC) is an important light-absorbing particulate matter that absorbs solar radiation in the visible to infrared spectrum, and it is one of the main aerosols causing global warming1-2, with its greenhouse effect second only to CO2 and CH43; meanwhile, BC particles can also inhibit the development of the atmospheric boundary layer by changing the surface radiation energy balance and heating the top of the boundary layer, triggering the "dome effect" and exacerbating regional air pollution4. BC particles are also the main component of atmospheric particulate matter that has toxic effects on the lungs, impacting human health5-6.
The strong light absorption capability of BC particles is a core factor in their climatic and haze - causing effects, but there is still no consensus on the evaluation of their light absorption, making it a frontier scientific issue in atmospheric environmental research. Freshly emitted BC particles undergo an "aging" process in the atmosphere, including condensation, coagulation, heterogeneous reactions, etc., which alter their physicochemical properties. Different studies have shown great discrepancies in evaluating the enhancement magnitude of light absorption of aged BC particles, with a range of 6% to 250%7-8, indicating that there are still significant gaps in understanding the evolution of light absorption during the aging process of BC particles, and the mechanism of light absorption evolution has become the focus of current debate7. Recent studies have shown that the morphological characteristics of BC particles are important factors affecting their light absorption capacity. Freshly emitted BC particles exist in a branched structure, composed of many hydrophobic carbon spheres with diameters ranging from 15 to 40 nm9-11, but under certain combustion conditions, the diameter of carbon spheres can reach about 100 nm or even larger12. After fresh BC particles are emitted into the atmosphere, during the aging process, the condensation of non - BC components, particle phase separation, and particle coagulation may all lead to morphological evolution of BC particles11. For example, when fresh BC particles age and are coated by non - BC components, in the classical "core - shell" model, the outer non - BC component is called the "shell", which enhances the light absorption of aged BC particles due to the "lens effect", and the pure BC is wrapped inside the aged BC particles, known as the "core"12. Laboratory and field observation studies have shown that after being coated by non - BC components, compared with fresh branched BC particles, partially and fully coated BC particles can increase light absorption by 1.37 to 3.6 times the original8, 13-18, and the difference in the proportion of non - BC components in single particles may lead to a 14% to 51% difference in the enhancement of light absorption of BC particles16. However, during the condensation and wrapping process of non - BC components, the morphology of the BC core may also change. Some studies have found that the spatial structure of carbon spheres becomes more compact19, while other studies have not observed significant changes in the morphology of the BC core20. The morphological evolution process of BC cores from loose branches to dense clusters is called the collapse process, also known as the restructuring process, first proposed by Mikhailov et al.21. Many studies have shown that the collapse process of BC will further affect its optical properties2, 8, 22-26. Some studies have found that the Mass Absorption Cross section (MAC) of collapsed BC is reduced by up to 30% compared with its fresh branched state27, but the branched state of BC will increase scattering by 30% due to multiple scattering between primary carbon spheres28. Therefore, a full understanding of the morphological evolution process and mechanism of BC particles during the aging process is beneficial to elucidate the changing rules of optical properties and reduce the uncertainty in assessing the impact of BC particles on the environment and climate.
This article will summarize the quantitative characterization parameters and measurement methods of BC particulate morphology, and based on laboratory and field observation studies, summarize the morphological evolution rules of BC particles during multiple aging processes, discuss and organize the microphysical mechanisms involved, clarify the impact on the light absorption properties of BC particles, and provide theoretical support for the accurate assessment of their environmental and climate effects.

2 Quantitative Characterization Parameters and Related Measuring Instruments of BC Particulate Morphology

The morphological evolution of BC particles significantly influences their optical properties and climatic effects, making the quantitative characterization of morphological features crucial for assessing their optical properties and climatic impacts. In laboratory and field observations, methods involving the combined use of instruments and the introduction of certain morphology-related parameters are typically employed to quantify the degree of BC morphological evolution. Parameters related to morphology mainly characterize the changes in the BC core and the overall morphology of BC particles through online and offline instrument measurements. The combined use of instruments primarily quantifies morphological information such as the size, mass, mixing state, and hygroscopicity of BC particles before and after aging.

2.1 Quantitative Characterization Parameters of BC Particle Morphology

The morphological information of BC is relatively complex, and usually, multiple parameters are used to jointly characterize the morphological evolution of BC. Parameters such as effective density (ρeff), fractal dimension (Df), and dynamic shape factor (χ) are used to characterize the compactness of BC particles, and all these parameters can be calculated from data measured by online instruments. Additionally, some studies use parameters obtained from electron microscope identification, such as Roundness (RN), Convexity (CE), and Aspect Ratio (AR), to collectively characterize the morphological features of BC particles29-31.
ρeff is used to characterize the compactness of a large number of small carbon spheres within particulate clusters. The greater the effective density, the more pronounced the compactness of BC particles. For example, field observation studies by Zhang et al. in North China have shown that as the proportion of non-BC components increases, the ρeff of the BC core increases from about 0.5 g/cm3 to 1.2 g/cm3[32.
ρ e f f = 6 m π D p 3
in Equation (1), m is the mass of the particulate matter, and Dp is the electrical mobility diameter of the particulate matter.
Df is a measure of the irregularity of particulate matter used to characterize cluster structures, and it is one of the key parameters for quantifying the structure of BC particulate matter, which can be used to distinguish the degree of irregularity between fresh and aged particles. When the fractal dimension Df is close to 1, it indicates that the morphology of the particles is approximately a straight line; when the fractal dimension Df is close to 3, it suggests that the particles are spherical[33]. Studies have shown that the typical Df value of aged urban environmental BC particles is around 1.82, ranging from 1.50 to 2.60[16]. For different types of BC particles, the Df ranges from 1.80 to 2.16, increasing in the following order: fresh < partially encapsulated < fully encapsulated BC particles[33]. There are also significant differences in Df among fresh BC particles from different sources. For example, the Df of fresh diesel BC particles typically ranges from 2.2 to 2.4, within which the BC particle structures are all dendritic[34]. Pang et al. measured the Df of BC particles from different sources, and found a significant difference between the average Df (1.66±0.17) of vehicle-emitted BC particles and those from biomass burning (1.75±0.18) and coal combustion (1.76±0.18). The average Df (1.77±0.18) of BC particles in urban atmospheres is close to the Df of biomass and coal combustion but much lower than that in rural atmospheres (Df(1.85±0.13))[12, 35]. Li et al.[16] demonstrated that an accurate description of Df can significantly improve the assessment of the optical effects of BC particles.
N = k 2 R g d p D f
in Equation (2), dp is the radius of fresh BC, where the number of BC carbon microsphere monomers is N, Rg refers to the rotational radius of BC (a particle size characterizing the features of cluster particles, which can be measured by techniques such as electron microscopy), k is a prefactor, and the values of Df and k are determined by power function fitting of N with 2Rg/dp.
χ is also used to characterize the irregularity of particles. If χ=1, it indicates that the particle is a standard sphere. The larger the χ, the more obvious its non-spherical characteristics are32, 36.
χ = D p × C c D v e D v e × C c D m
among them, Dp is the electrical mobility diameter of the particles, Dve is the volume equivalent diameter of the particles, Dm is the mobility diameter, and Cc represents the Cunningham correction factor for the corresponding particle size. The research by Guo et al.19 shows that when BC particles are exposed to the OH oxidation products of m-xylene, χ decreases from around 1.5 to nearly 1.0, indicating that as the degree of aging increases, the morphology of BC particles transitions from an initially highly irregular structure towards a spherical shape.
Pei et al37 also defined BC spatial ratios (internal space ratio, open space ratio), internal space modified dynamic shape factor, etc., in their study to characterize the BC structure.
Some other two-dimensional shape parameters, such as AR, RN, CE, etc., are used to characterize the sphericity of particles. These parameters can be obtained through electron microscopy38.
A R = L m a x W m a x
R o u n d n e s s = 4 A a ( π L m a x 2 )
C o n v e x i t y = A a A p o l y g o n
in Equation (4), AR is the area ratio, Lmax and Wmax are the maximum length and width of the boundary, and in Equations (5) and (6), Aa is the projected area of BC particles. For spherical particles, AR=RN=1, while for non-spherical particles: AR>1 and RN<1. The values of RN and CE vary between 0 and 1, with larger values indicating that the BC particles are more compact. Chen et al.[29] found that the CE and RN of fresh BC particles were 0.43±0.06 and 0.25±0.08, respectively. After being coated with pyrene, fluoranthene, and phenanthrene, the BC particles collapsed significantly, with CE increasing to 0.75~0.88 and RN increasing to 0.45~0.66.

2.2 Measurement Method of Morphological Parameters of BC Particles

2.2.1 Measurement Instruments

The measurement or calculation of morphology-related parameters for BC particulates is often based on online methods, including instruments such as aerosol particle mass analyzers, particle mass sifters, scanning mobility particle size spectrometers, and aerodynamic particle size selectors, which primarily measure properties like particle size and mass. Instruments like single-particle soot photometers are mostly used for measuring the mixing state of BC. Offline instruments such as scanning electron microscopes and transmission electron microscopes are more commonly applied to the direct morphological measurement of BC particles. Table 1 summarizes the principles, measurement parameters, advantages, and disadvantages of commonly used instruments capable of obtaining morphological changes in BC.
表1 BC性质常见测量仪器

Table 1 Common measuring instruments for BC properties.

Full name of the instrument Abbreviation name of the instrument Measurement principle Main measurement parameters Particle size range Main advantages and disadvantages online/offline
Single Particle soot photometer SP2 Laser induced incandescence Mass of single particle BC, mix state 70~700 nm Quantitative analysis of single particle mix state; Limited measurement range of particle size online
Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometry SP-AMS Laser induced incandescence, mass spectrum Mass ratio of BC to non BC components PM1.0 Measure the chemical composition of BC; Only the mixed state of particle groups can be measured under conventional configuration online
Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer APM Balance of centrifugal force and electrostatic force Mass of BC particles 14 nm~1.3 μm Fast and high-precision separation ability for measurement; Particle aggregation leads to reduced scanning efficiency and a limited range of measured particle sizes online
Centri-fugal particle mass analyzer CPMA Balance of centrifugal force and electrostatic force Mass of BC particles 7 nm~1.3 μm online
Scanning Mobility Particle Spectrometer SMPS Different particle sizes have different electromigration rates BC particle size and number concentration 10~680 nm Not dependent on the optical and fluid properties of particles; Low detection rate for particles below 200nm online
Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier AAC Aerodynamics BC particle size 25 nm~5 μm No need to charge, using air jet technology to screen reduce the aggregation of small particle samples; Limited screening accuracy online
Volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer VTDMA Changes in particle size before and after heating Changes in particle size before and after volatilization 100~600 nm Direct measurement of the particle size changes before and after heating, without parameter assumptions; Extremely low volatile organic compounds may remain after heating online
Humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer HTDMA Changes in particle size before and after humidification Hygroscopic growth factor 100~600 nm Direct measurement of hygroscopic growth factor online
Transmission Electron Microscope TEM Laser irradiation generates secondary electrons in the sample BC microstructure

Direct measurement of the surface morphology of BC; Laser high temperature causes evaporation of the coating material,

Low scanning time resolution

offline
Scanning Electron Microscope SEM Transmission electron imaging offline
The instruments in Table 1 can characterize the morphological features of BC particles by measuring properties such as particle size, mass, and microscopic morphology. Instruments like SMPS and AAC are commonly used for particle size measurement. SMPS consists of DMA (Differential Mobility Analyzer) and CPC (Condensation Particle Counters), which can measure the particle size and number concentration information of 70~700 nm BC particles. Its advantage is that it can achieve rapid scanning (<10 s), enabling high-resolution nanoscale particle size measurement through 128 particle size channels and single-particle counting, with high measurement accuracy and repeatability. AAC sorts particles between 25~>5000 nm according to aerodynamic size, and its advantage is that particle classification during measurement is independent of charge, avoiding measurement errors caused by multiply charged particles[39-42].
APM and CPMA are often used for the observation of BC particulate mass, both having similar measurement principles. They charge aerosol particles through a neutralizer and classify particles by mass-equivalent diameter based on the balance of centrifugal force and electrostatic force. Compared with APM, CPMA has a wider particle size measurement range43-46. Unlike APM and CPMA, which measure the mass of BC particle ensembles, SP2 can directly measure the mass and scattering coefficient of single BC particles. The intensity of the incandescence signal generated by laser irradiation of particles is positively correlated with the pure BC mass, allowing the determination of pure BC mass in individual BC particles. SP2 can also simultaneously detect scattering signals to obtain the size of entire BC particles and determine the mixing state of BC particles combined with pure BC information30,32. SP-AMS can perform real-time in-situ measurements of BC particles, using the laser-induced incandescence principle similar to the SP module in SP2 to measure the pure BC mass in BC particles, while the AMS module measures non-BC chemical components, providing information on mixing states and chemical compositions at high time resolution. AMS can obtain specific mass spectral characteristics, thus SP-AMS combined with source apportionment methods such as PMF (Positive Matrix Factorization) can be used to estimate the relative contributions of different types of sources to atmospheric BC particles47-53. Additionally, due to its high time-resolution measurement capability, it is suitable for investigating aerosol chemical reaction kinetics and microphysical properties under controlled experimental conditions such as in reaction flow tubes and smog chambers as well as in field observations54-57.
The combination of single-particle sampling and electron microscopy techniques has also been utilized to study the properties of single BC particles. TEM and SEM are the primary electron microscopy techniques for analyzing the morphology of single particles. They irradiate the sample with an electron beam and then use an electron probe to capture secondary electrons excited from the sample, which enter the electron imaging system for imaging. The advantage is that they can obtain the particle size distribution of BC particles as well as the intuitive morphological characteristics of BC particles. However, both TEM and SEM require the collected samples to be placed in a high vacuum environment for analysis. On one hand, the morphology and composition of particles differ between vacuum conditions and atmospheric conditions; considering the low-pressure environment of the microscope and the high-temperature environment under the electron laser, it is easy for the coating layer to volatilize. On the other hand, changes in particles with environmental humidity cannot be examined in a vacuum environment. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM)[58], Environmental Transmission Electron Microscopy (ETEM), and in-situ Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)[59] can all achieve imaging under non-vacuum conditions, providing observational conditions for studying the morphological evolution of BC particles with changing environmental conditions. ESEM and ETEM have been developed based on SEM and TEM, respectively. Compared to conventional TEM monitoring in a high vacuum environment, ETEM allows monitoring at a pressure of 10-20 mm/Hg in the environment, making it possible to adjust the relative humidity during sample detection by regulating water vapor pressure and temperature. However, ETEM is rarely used in studying changes in BC particles with environmental humidity[60]. Similar to ETEM, ESEM can reduce the impact of sample preparation on imaging. By adding variables such as hydration, thermal cycling, and gas introduction, it characterizes in-situ dynamic changes, achieving characterization of the sample in its natural state. ESEM is widely used to observe changes in the morphology of BC particles during oxidation and hygroscopic dynamic processes[58,61-62]. When the tiny tip of AFM comes into contact with the atoms on the sample surface, a repulsive force is generated. The micro-cantilever controlling the tip movement senses this repulsive force to control the tip's fluctuating motion in the vertical direction relative to the sample surface, converting positional changes at each scanning point into electrical signals, thereby obtaining information about the sample surface morphology. It can probe physical properties including morphology in the nanoscale region of various samples under atmospheric and liquid environments. Compared to SEM, AFM offers advantages such as high resolution, three-dimensional imaging of the sample surface, and no damage to the sample; however, the AFM sample preparation process in solution may alter the morphology and aggregation state of nanoparticles. AFM is widely used to study the molecular structure during the early formation of BC particles[63-66]. Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM) has significant application value in studying the collapse of the microstructure morphology of BC particles. Its cryogenic operation in liquid nitrogen can solidify the morphology of BC particles, avoiding the influence of ordinary microscope lasers and low-pressure environments on their coating layers. For instance, Zhang et al.[67] used the Cryo-TEM method to rapidly freeze field-collected BC particles and directly observed the liquid-liquid phase separation process, which redistributed the BC core into the organic coating layer. Although electron microscopy methods can provide intuitive morphological features and data information of BC particles, they are affected by substrate effects, allowing only a small number of BC particle structural changes to be observed at a time, making it difficult to characterize a large amount of BC morphology changes.

2.2.2 Commonly Used Combination Methods

The complex situation of morphological evolution of BC particles cannot be characterized by a single parameter obtained with an individual instrument alone. Therefore, multiple parameters are usually obtained in the measurement to characterize the degree of their morphological evolution using combined instruments such as DMA and APM/CPMA, SP2 and DMA/CPMA, etc.
HTDMA and VTDMA are the most commonly used instrument systems based on SMPS. HTDMA and VTDMA respectively add humidification and heating devices between DMA and SMPS, which can measure the size changes of BC particles before and after heating and humidification, and calculate parameters such as volatility distribution and hygroscopic growth factors to study the volatility and hygroscopic properties of particles. They are widely used in the measurement of the mixing state and morphology of BC particles during the aging process[18, 68-70]. Cheng et al.[71] observed a significant reduction in particle size after nitrate-coated BC particles were humidified based on HTDMA measurements, indicating that the BC core had collapsed. As a fundamental platform for the physicochemical properties of BC particles, it can also be combined with other techniques to determine key parameters such as mass, size, optical absorption and scattering coefficients, and morphology of particles after thermal desorption and humidification.
The combination of DMA and APM/CPMA is often used in research to characterize the changes in particle size and mass of BC particles before and after aging, which allows for the calculation of parameters such as the mass mobility exponent ($D_{fm}$) and $ρ_{eff}$. Dfm serves as an indirect measurement of the morphology of irregularly shaped aggregates, representing the characteristics of fresh or coated BC particles. Pei et al.[37] used the DMA-APM combined method and observed that BC particles with similar mobility diameters (≈100 nm) exhibited similar Dfm values (2.14~2.28), indicating that primary carbon spheres of BC can coalesce through collision processes to form BC particles. Several studies utilizing this method have drawn similar conclusions, showing a significant increase in Dfm of BC particles before and after aging, suggesting their irregular shapes gradually transition towards a spherical form[72-73]. The combination of DMA-APM/CPMA can also be used to measure effective density. Studies have shown that the effective density of fresh BC particles from various sources, such as diesel engines, diffusion burners, and premixed burners, ranges from 0.2 to 1.2 g/cm3, typically decreasing with increasing electrical mobility diameter[74-75]. Multiple studies using this approach found that the effective density of BC particles increases during the aging process, implying that BC particles gradually become denser[30, 76]. Schnitzler et al.[73] used the combination of DMA and CPMA and found that the mass factor and effective density of aged BC particles increased, while the effective density of larger BC particles was lower than that of smaller ones. The combination of DMA-APM/CPMA with VH-TDMA allows for a comprehensive examination of multiple properties of particles, including particle size distribution, density, volatility, hygroscopicity, and mass growth[77-78]. Khalizov et al.[79] combined HTDMA and DMA-APM to study the hygroscopic changes during the internal mixing process of submicron BC particles with sulfuric acid, showing that humidified sulfuric acid-coated BC particles exhibited significant hygroscopic growth patterns.
SP2 is often used in conjunction with DMA or CPMA to obtain more detailed information about the distribution of BC cores and coating layers by measuring the mixing state after sifting BC particle size or mass. The combination of SP2 and DMA is used to measure the mixing state of BC particles and the thickness of the coating layer. The introduction of humidifying devices, such as the combination of HTDMA and SP2, can not only measure the mixing state of BC particles but also be used to measure hygroscopic changes, and can obtain the distribution of particle shape and chemical composition within a single particle. Li et al80 studied the change in the mixing state of BC particles in the atmospheric environment of Shanghai and its impact on hygroscopicity. The results show that the hygroscopicity of BC is related to the thickness and chemical composition of the coating layer. Under the same conditions, BC particles with a thinner nitrate coating layer and those with a thicker organic carbon coating layer have the same hygroscopicity. In addition, the combination of other instruments, such as CPMA-SP2, where CPMA is used to select particles of a specific mass, and the corresponding mass of the BC core of the particles is measured by SP2, thus the combination of CPMA-SP2 can visually identify the mass distribution of the coating layer and the BC core of the BC particle group. This combined technology simultaneously measures the number distribution of BC core and total particle mass81-83, achieving the quantitative measurement of the mixing state of BC particles without morphological assumptions and model calculations84.

3 Morphological Evolution Characteristics and Absorption Effects of Different Aging Processes of BC Particles

Based on existing research, the morphological changes of BC particles during the aging process are related to various factors. Freshly emitted BC particles undergo aging processes such as condensation, phase separation, and coalescence when released into the atmosphere, which in turn drive their morphological changes. Additionally, factors such as the thickness and polarity of non-BC components, and the aging sites of BC particles are also related to morphological changes. Therefore, in field observations, significant variations in microstructures such as coating thickness (mixing state), core position, and core structure of BC particles are often observed 85-86. The numerous and complex morphological characteristics after aging further influence their optical properties.

3.1 Condensation Process

During the initial aging process, vapors generated from gas-phase or heterogeneous reactions condense onto the surface of BC particles. Numerous studies have reported the collapse of BC particle branches during the condensation process, yet understanding of the collapse mechanism remains limited. The current perspective suggests that properties such as surface tension, polarity, and melting point of the coating materials are key factors influencing the deformation of BC particles.
Regarding the influence of surface tension, since the encapsulating material tends to minimize the surface area of the condensate to reduce surface energy during the condensation process on the surface of BC particles, this leads to a stretching effect on the carbon microspheres on both sides, and the greater the surface tension, the stronger the stretching effect, resulting in a more significant collapse of BC particles. However, some studies have shown that exposing BC particles to the vapor of saturated ethanol and dimethyl sulfoxide/water mixtures, despite a 2.5-fold difference in surface tension of the condensed material under these two conditions, results in a similar degree of collapse87, indicating that surface tension alone cannot fully explain the collapse of BC particles. As for the influence of the melting point of the encapsulating material, Corbin et al.88 suggested that the presence of encapsulating material in solid form on BC particles does not cause deformation, and its liquid form on the surface of BC particles is a necessary prerequisite for morphological evolution.
Regarding the impact of the polarity of encapsulating substances during the condensation process, studies have found that when the non-BC component is a non-polar substance, non-polar substances tend to adhere more easily to the surface of BC particles, causing the BC core to collapse89, whereas this tendency is not as strong for polar encapsulating substances88. This is mainly because the surface of fresh BC particles exhibits non-polar characteristics90, which results in a lower contact angle with non-polar substances, making it easier for metastable liquid phases of different shapes to form between adjacent carbon spheres, leading to the collapse of BC particle branches through capillary forces. Recent research has proposed that the mechanism behind the collapse of BC particles during condensation is primarily determined by the polarity of the non-BC components. Non-polar substances exhibit a low contact angle with the surface of BC particles, allowing capillary condensation to occur between two adjacent carbon spheres, producing metastable liquid phases of different forms and inducing capillary forces that cause the collapse of BC particle branches, known as the capillary collapse mechanism88. As shown in Figure 1a. This is the key factor behind the collapse of BC particles induced by non-polar substances during condensation. Some experiments have provided evidence of condensation-induced collapse. Chen et al. and Enekwizu et al.89 encapsulated sub-monolayers of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and triethylene glycol on BC particles under subsaturated conditions29-30, where only capillary collapse could be triggered, providing further evidence for the capillary collapse29-30. Evidence of condensation-induced collapse has also been demonstrated under subsaturated vapor conditions of non-polar substances in other experiments34,87. This also explains that the polarity of substances is a key factor affecting the collapse of BC particle branches during the condensation process.
图1 Schematic Diagram of BC Collapse Mechanism: The black circles in the figure represent carbon pellets, and the gray shadow represents the encapsulation layer: (a) Capillary Collapse Mechanism, (b) Droplet Activation Mechanism, (c) Evaporation Collapse Mechanism (The image is redrawn from Reference 88).

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of BC collapse mechanism, with black circles representing carbon balls and gray shadows representing the coating layer. (a) capillary collapse mechanism, (b) droplet activation mechanism, (c) evaporation collapse mechanism. (Images modified from ref 88)

However, during the condensation process, when the non-BC component is a polar substance, the polar substance exhibits a high contact angle with BC particles, which means that a higher density of nanodroplets may be required to form a metastable phase. A high density of nanodroplets will require a higher concentration of saturated vapor. Therefore, in some laboratory studies, wrapping BC particles with low saturated vapor polar substances does not result in the observation of BC core collapse. For example, fresh BC particles show almost no collapse when exposed to water vapor under low saturation conditions87, 91, because water is a polar liquid and exhibits a high contact angle with the surface of BC particles; a high contact angle does not cause capillary forces between adjacent carbon microsphere monomers. Brauer et al. reported two cases where dendritic BC particles were found during autopsies of residents in Mexico City92, indicating that these fresh hydrophobic BC particles did not collapse as they entered the lungs. Another nanoactivation mechanism proposed by Corbin et al. (as shown in Fig. 1c) suggests that when the vapor concentration reaches the critical saturation ratio on a curved surface, metastable phases such as nanodroplets, thin films, and capillary phases may be activated into droplets and grow without any energy barrier88. Thus, BC particles may undergo a nanodroplet activation process but without generating capillary forces, so the BC particles do not collapse. Under extreme supersaturation conditions, multiple nanodroplets on two or more carbon microspheres can overcome energy barriers and simultaneously activate into droplets, and these droplets connect two non-adjacent carbon microspheres through a capillary phase, thereby generating an attractive force. Alternatively, when pendant capillary rings or adsorption films grow to engulf the particles they connect, capillary bridges can form, generating mutually attractive capillary forces among three adjacent spheres. There is no direct evidence showing the capillary bridge collapse mechanism during actual measurements. Only in Chen et al.'s study was this theory speculated, where a group of compounds were exposed to an experimental temperature of 50°C, causing instantaneous collapse of BC particles. They believed that at the current temperature, the vapor of the encapsulating layer has a high transient saturation ratio, under such extreme supersaturation conditions, capillary nucleation cannot occur, i.e., capillary condensation does not happen30. Multiple nanodroplets on the surface of carbon microsphere monomers might be simultaneously activated and rapidly grow to interconnect, forming capillary rings that engulf the carbon microspheres, possibly leading to the collapse of BC particles through the capillary bridge collapse mechanism30.
Previous studies have suggested that the morphological evolution of BC particles during the condensation process significantly affects their optical properties, but the results of their light absorption properties are not consistent. For example, the mass absorption cross-section of a collapsed BC core can decrease by up to 30% compared to its fresh branched state27. However, some studies suggest that the scattering cross-section of branched BC particles is smaller than that of a fully collapsed spherical BC core28. In the actual atmosphere, BC particles mostly focus on the transition of mixed states and the increase in coating thickness (as shown in Figure 2), and multiple studies indicate that light absorption enhancement is highly correlated with the mixed state. BC particles coated by non-BC components can enhance light absorption through a lensing effect93-96. There is limited research on the initial condensation process of non-BC components on the surface of BC particles regarding their optical properties. Peng et al. suggested that during the early aging stage of BC particles, when only a small amount of material is coated, BC collapses from a branched structure into an approximately spherical structure, which does not significantly increase the MAC of BC particles and may even show an initial increase followed by a decrease97-99. This process implies a competitive relationship between the collapsing of BC branches and the lensing effect on the absorption during the early stages of aging97. Currently, there are few reports on the optical properties of BC cores that do not collapse during the condensation process.
图2 Morphological Types of BC in the Actual Atmosphere: (a) Fresh Exposed Type, (b) Partially Encapsulated Type, (c) Fully Encapsulated Type 25

Fig. 2 The morphology types of BC in the ambient air (a) bare type, (b) partly-coated type, (c) fully encapsulated type 25

Additionally, studies have pointed out that during the aging process of BC, non-BC components may start aging at the end positions of BC branch structures rather than the main body of the branch-like structure. Therefore, when BC is completely encapsulated by non-BC components, the BC core is not always located at the center of the BC particles (as shown in Figure 3d)[84]. The optical properties of BC particles with this eccentric structure differ somewhat from those of BC particles with an ideal core-shell structure. Laboratory measurement results from Liu et al. indicate that the initial aging situation at the ends of BC branches is similar to the scattering coefficient values and trends simulated by the externally mixed core-shell model, suggesting that the aging process of BC begins at the ends of its branches[84]. When internally mixed and the BC core fully collapses, laboratory measurements and model simulations yield similar results. However, in the transition zone between external and internal mixing, there is a significant discrepancy between the measured scattering coefficients and the simulations. Cappa et al. observed that the light absorption enhancement of the coating layer in internally mixed BC particles in California was only about 6%, and the MAC values of the BC particle group did not show a significant increase with the increase in BC particle mass. This conclusion differs considerably from smog chamber results and MIE model calculations[8]. They suggested that in the actual atmosphere, the BC core exists at the edge rather than the center of the particles. Thus, they proposed that BC particles with an eccentric core structure cause differences in light absorption capacity between observations and smog chamber and model simulations, questioning the applicability of MIE scattering theory in the real atmosphere. Huang et al.[86], based on field observation data, found that the light absorption properties of these eccentrically structured particles would further decrease by 40%.
图3 (a) Redistribution Structure67, (b) BC Adhesion to Other Aerosol Surfaces86, (c) BC Adhesion to Other Aerosol Surfaces33, (d) Eccentric BC Core-Shell Structure33

Fig. 3 (a) redistribution structure67, (b) BC adhesion to other aerosol surfaces86, (c) BC adhesion to other aerosol surfaces33, (d) eccentric core-shell structure of BC33

From the perspective of curvature, there are convex spherical surfaces on the surface of BC particles and grooves between two carbon spheres. According to the Kelvin effect, the sites for initial condensation of different substances may vary. Some studies suggest that non-BC components would first condense in the grooves between BC carbon spheres or uniformly adhere to the surface of carbon spheres[30]. Therefore, it still needs further verification whether the aging of non-BC components starts from the ends of BC branches.

3.2 Phase Separation Process

The aging of BC particles in the atmosphere involves encapsulation by various substances. When a certain relative humidity threshold is reached, the "salting-out effect" causes the particles to separate into two distinct liquid phases: typically, an outer organic phase and an inner inorganic aqueous phase. This phenomenon is referred to as the liquid-liquid phase separation of atmospheric particles, or simply phase separation100-102. Recent studies have found that BC particles encapsulated by large amounts of organic and inorganic materials also undergo phase separation, which may alter the position of the BC core within the particle. Brunamonti et al.101, based on laboratory observations of BC particle distribution in mixed solutions, first proposed that the BC core might migrate during phase separation, moving from the center of the particle to its surface (as shown in Figure 3a). Model calculations suggested that this migration increases the light absorption capacity of the BC core by 25%. Recent field observations have revealed that up to 73% of BC particles with a core-shell structure experience the migration of the BC core from the inorganic phase to the organic phase103, indicating that the phase separation process of BC particles may be common in the atmosphere. Zhang et al.67 used cryo-electron microscopy to analyze atmospheric particle samples and found that BC particles encapsulated by both inorganic and organic components undergo phase separation at relative humidity levels between 75% and 88%, accompanied by partial migration of the BC core and collapse of its branches. The study concluded that the migration of the BC core reduces light absorption by 28%~34%, challenging the traditional view that increased coating thickness leads to higher light absorption enhancement. The scattering cross-sections of these particles are 50% larger than those of uniformly mixed particles, but their absorption cross-sections can decrease by up to 20%16.

3.3 Collision Process

In addition to the process of condensation on the surface of BC particles, other substances can also be fixed onto the surface of BC particles through the processes of collision or deposition. Laboratory studies have found that the processes of collision or deposition do not induce capillary forces, thus not causing the collapse of the BC core88. Corbin et al.88 achieved anthracene coating in a solid state deposition on the surface of BC particles by controlling the temperature. Although DMA measurements showed an increase in the size of the coated BC particles, electron microscope images revealed that the BC particles still maintained a fresh branched structure. Similar findings were observed in another study. Slowik et al.104 used anthracene to coat BC particles and removed these coating layers by heating at 200 ℃, below anthracene's melting point of 216 ℃. The solid-state anthracene coating layer did not cause structural reorganization of the BC core. Chen et al.29 coated BC particles with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and observed significant reorganization under sub-nanometer coatings of pyrene, fluoranthene, and phenanthrene. They suggested that the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were in a thin-film liquid state, with these liquid layers acting as lubricants reducing the force required to initiate reorganization. Conversely, thin layers of higher melting point polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., perylene, anthracene, and triphenylene) might remain solid at room temperature, causing less structural change to the BC core.
In the laboratory, it can be observed that there is no surface tension generated between carbon microspheres during the coalescence process under controlled conditions, so the controlled experimental conditions do not lead to the collapse of BC cores. However, the actual atmospheric environment is more complex, and the coalescence between different particles in heavily polluted areas may be an important mixing mechanism24. Moreover, the coalescence has a certain randomness, which could involve fresh BC particles or aged BC particles coalescing with other aerosols. There is still a lack of research on the impact of changes in surface tension of different aerosols during the coalescence process on the morphology of BC cores and BC particles. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the coalescence process in the actual atmosphere can cause the collapse of BC cores. Additionally, BC particles can coalesce at various locations on other aerosols, thus the coalescence process also significantly affects the morphological evolution of BC particles. Recent observational studies have found that during the transport process dominated by coalescence, the BC cores in BC particles are mostly eccentric structures and the number of BC cores increases105, these complex morphological structures bring some difficulties to accurately measuring optical properties. In recent years, some scholars have conducted simulation studies on the impact of irregular morphology on optical properties. Huang et al.86 further parameterized the non-spherical structure of BC cores based on field observation data, and this morphology of BC particles reduces the light absorption enhancement of BC particles by 30% compared to core-shell simulations. Fierce et al.24 compared the measured light absorption enhancement factor with the calculated light absorption enhancement factor based on the core-shell morphology assumption in laboratory studies and found that since the BC particles generated in the laboratory still exhibited irregular shapes, their light absorption values would be lower than those of core-shell structures. The modified core-shell MIE model improves the simulation performance of light absorption capacity but still cannot characterize the non-spherical morphological characteristics of BC particles in the actual atmosphere. Other optical models, such as Rayleigh-Debye-Gans fractal aggregate theory (RDG)106, multi-sphere T-matrix method (MSTM)107, and discrete dipole approximation (Discrete Dipole Approximation, DDA), etc., can be used to simulate the complex structure of BC particles. RDG and MSTM can use aggregates of multiple spheres to characterize the complex chain-like sphere structure of BC cores and use large-volume spheres to represent non-BC coatings, thereby establishing a model of BC particles with coatings. Li et al.108 used the RDG model to simulate the scattering phase function of BC particles produced by biomass and fossil fuel combustion, and the simulation results were in good agreement with the nephelometer measurements. Liu et al.109 found using MSTM simulation that the light absorption intensity of BC particles with non-absorbing coating layers can reach approximately 2. The shape of BC particles in the atmosphere is highly irregular and diverse, but the shape modeling of particles in RDG and MSTM can only calculate the scattering characteristics of aggregates composed of non-overlapping primary particles with special geometric shapes (such as spheres and spheres) and cannot flexibly simulate BC particles of various shapes in the atmosphere. DDA can perform optical simulations on BC particles of arbitrary shapes. In recent years, some scholars have estimated the optical properties of BC particles of different shapes based on the DDA algorithm. Feng Xue110 used a simplified core-shell model to simulate the absorption enhancement, which overestimated the maximum by about 36% compared to observations, while the simulated absorption enhancement value using DDA was between 2 and 2.2, consistent with most observation results. Three-dimensional modeling methods have also been applied to describe the morphology of BC particles. Wang et al.25 developed the SP-EMBS-DDA simulation tool using DDA combined with three-dimensional modeling methods, which can directly obtain the morphology and mixing structure of aged BC particles from SEM or TEM electron images, simulating the overall morphology of BC particles and the complex morphology of BC cores, describing the morphological structure of BC particles in the atmosphere and its changes in light absorption capacity as accurately as possible, and indicating that the light absorption enhancement of BC particles has a nonlinear relationship with the thickness of the secondary coating layer. However, compared with the other three models, the computational efficiency of the MIE theory is significantly higher, so the MIE model is widely used. Although numerous studies analyze the optical properties of aerosols using numerical simulation methods, the models established through numerical simulations in these studies still differ significantly from the mixing structure of single BC particles in the actual atmosphere. Detailed introductions to optical models and radiative forcing simulations can be found in Li et al.'s review16.

3.4 Evaporation Process

The evaporation process of the coating layer on the surface of BC particles also largely affects the morphology of the BC core, namely, the restructuring process of the BC core as the liquid coating layer on the surface of BC particles evaporates, as shown in Figure 3d. In this process, the coating layer is generally a polar substance, and the polar substance exhibits a high contact angle with the surface of the carbon microspheres; substances with a high contact angle do not cause capillary forces between the carbon microspheres. During the evaporation process, individual carbon microspheres in a force-balanced state will experience inward movement due to the capillary force from the retreating liquid-air interface, and overall, the BC particles will be subjected to a net compressive force leading to collapse during evaporation, referred to as evaporative collapse. Some laboratory studies have provided evidence for the mechanism of evaporative collapse. Research by Leung et al.[111] and Chen et al.[29], using glassy SOA and solid anthracene respectively, shows that thin coatings lead to an increase in the migration diameter of BC particles, and when the coating is removed by heating, the migration diameter decreases, suggesting the collapse of BC particles during evaporation. Some studies propose that droplet evaporation in atmospheric processes may also lead to the collapse of BC particles. Ma et al.[72] provided more direct observational evidence in their study; they found that fresh BC particles remained in a low fractal dimension, branch-like state within water droplets, and observed via TEM that the BC core collapsed somewhat during the evaporation of water vapor. However, in laboratory measurements, the evaporation process might be due to measurement errors caused by heating to remove the coating layer or by laser-induced high temperatures in electron microscopy. Corbin et al.[88] also verified the mechanism of evaporative collapse by controlling temperature so that the anthracene coating layer was deposited on the surface of BC particles in a solid state (without surface tension), keeping the BC core in a branched shape, but after removing the coating layer by evaporation, microscopic images showed the collapse of the BC core. Without the heating process, the BC core may not collapse either. Additionally, Chen Chao[112] used ETEM to observe in situ that BC particles coated with pure H2SO4 vapor (high contact angle) or humidified H2SO4 vapor (high contact angle) still maintained a branched structure. However, in Zhang et al.'s[99] study, the BC core coated with pure sulfuric acid and humidified significantly collapsed, and the authors suggested it might be due to the reheating process of TDMA in the measurement system triggering the mechanism of evaporative collapse. The morphology of the BC core after artificially heating to remove the coating layer during instrument measurement cannot represent the actual morphology of the BC core, which in turn affects the calculation of its optical properties, also explaining to some extent why the optical properties calculated from laboratory measurements are greater than those observed in the field[8,113-114]; therefore, it is recommended to observe the morphology of BC particles using means such as electron microscopy before heating to remove the coating layer in experimental studies.

4 Conclusions and Prospects

In summary, the processes of condensation, phase separation, coalescence, and evaporation during the aging process may lead to the morphological evolution of BC particles. In the real atmospheric environment, there may be significant differences in the morphological characteristics between BC particles, which deviate from the unified characteristic assumption of particle groups in models, resulting in an overestimation of the light absorption ability of simulated aged BC particles17, 24, 115. Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the morphological evolution process and mechanism of the microstructure of BC particles to accurately quantify the light absorption ability of BC particles. Currently, researchers both domestically and internationally have made certain progress in studying the morphological evolution characteristics of BC particles. However, due to the limited field observation conditions and the differences between laboratory-controlled conditions and real atmospheric observation conditions, further research on the morphological evolution of BC particles is still needed. Firstly, there is a lack of in-depth research on the specific morphological evolution process of BC particles in the actual atmosphere. Secondly, the evidence for the mechanisms of morphological evolution simulated in the laboratory is still incomplete. Lastly, there is a certain gap between the simulation and observation of the light absorption evolution of BC particle morphology in the actual atmosphere. In summary, this article proposes the following prospects for the study of the morphological evolution process of BC particles.
(1) Investigate the morphological evolution process of actual atmospheric BC particles: Several studies have preliminarily explored the morphological evolution of BC in the actual atmosphere, but the mechanism of morphological evolution of BC particles under different atmospheric conditions remains unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the characteristics of morphological evolution of BC particles under different atmospheric conditions, identify the influence of factors such as temperature and humidity in the real atmospheric environment on the morphological evolution of BC particles, and explore the mechanism of morphological evolution of BC particles in the actual atmospheric environment.
(2) Further in-depth research on the morphological evolution mechanism of BC particles: exploring the microphysical structural morphology evolution characteristics of coated BC particles in different coating materials (polar substances, non-polar substances, or a mixture of both) and different temperature and humidity conditions, and improving the contribution of morphological evolution mechanism to the structural collapse of BC particles.
(3) Improvement of the light absorption model for BC particles: The morphology of BC particles varies in the actual atmospheric environment, and the existing parametric schemes of the model cannot reflect the real light absorption properties. It is necessary to further establish a parametric method for the morphological parameters and light absorption capacity of BC particles in the actual environmental atmosphere, reveal the radiative forcing of BC particles on the climate under real atmospheric conditions, and improve the accuracy of the model.
[1]
Bond T C Doherty S J Fahey D W Forster P M Berntsen T DeAngelo B J Flanner M G Ghan S Kärcher B Koch D Kinne S Kondo Y Quinn P K Sarofim M C Schultz M G Schulz M Venkataraman C Zhang H Zhang S Bellouin N Guttikunda S K Hopke P K Jacobson M Z Kaiser J W Klimont Z Lohmann U Schwarz J P Shindell D Storelvmo T Warren S G Zender C S. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2013118(11): 5380.

[2]
Ramanathan V Carmichael G. Nat. Geosci.20081(4): 221.

[3]
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change.2022.

[4]
Wang Z L Huang X Ding A J. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201818(4): 2821.

[5]
Bair W J. Health Phys.1989, 57: 249.

[6]
Lippmann M Albert R. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.196930(3): 257.

[7]
Tan T Y Guo S Wu Z J He L Y Huang X F Hu M. Chin. Sci. Bull.202065(36): 4235.

[8]
Cappa C D Onasch T B Massoli P Worsnop D R Bates T S Cross E S Davidovits P Hakala J Hayden K L Jobson B T Kolesar K R Lack D A Lerner B M Li S M Mellon D Nuaaman I Olfert J S Petäjä T Quinn P K Song C Subramanian R Williams E J Zaveri R A. Science2012337(6098): 1078.

[9]
Burtscher H. J. Aerosol Sci.200536(7): 896.

[10]
Hu B Koylu U. Aerosol Sci. Technol.200438(10): 1009.

[11]
Sachdeva K Attri A K. Atmos. Environ.200842(5): 1025.

[12]
Pang Y E Chen M H Wang Y Y Chen X Y Teng X M Kong S F Zheng Z H Li W J. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2023128(6): e2022JD037711.

[13]
Schnaiter M Schmid O Petzold A Fritzsche L Klein K F Andreae M O Helas G Thielmann A Gimmler M Möhler O Linke C Schurath U. Aerosol Sci. Technol.200539(3): 249.

[14]
Cappa C D Zhang X L Russell L M Collier S Lee A K Y Chen C L Betha R Chen S J Liu J Price D J Sanchez K J McMeeking G R Williams L R Onasch T B Worsnop D R Abbatt J Zhang Q. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2019124(3): 1550.

[15]
Wang Y Y Xu L Zhang Z X Zhang J Liu L Zhang Y X Pang Y E Yuan Q Fu P Q Liu D T Li W J. Atmos. Environ.2024, 326: 120489.

[16]
Li W J Riemer N Xu L Wang Y Y Adachi K Shi Z B Zhang D Z Zheng Z H Laskin A. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci.2024, 7: 65.

[17]
Peng J F Hu M Guo S Du Z F Zheng J Shang D J Levy Zamora M Zeng L M Shao M Wu Y-S Zheng J Wang Y Glen C R Collins D R Molina M J Zhang R Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2016113(16): 4266.

[18]
Liu D Allan J Whitehead J Young D Flynn M Coe H McFiggans G Fleming Z L Bandy B. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201313(4): 2015.

[19]
Guo S Hu M Lin Y Gomez-Hernandez M Zamora M L Peng J F Collins D R Zhang R Y. Environ. Sci. Technol.201650(16): 8605.

[20]
Rocca A L Di Liberto G Shayler P J Fay M W. Tribol. Int.2013, 61: 80.

[21]
Mikhailov E F Vlasenko S S Kiselev A A Ryshkevich T I. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys.199834(3): 345.

[22]
Zhang R Y Peng J F Wang Y Hu M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2016113(35): E5094.

[23]
Liu S Aiken A C Gorkowski K Dubey M K Cappa C D Williams L R Herndon S C Massoli P Fortner E C Chhabra P S Brooks W A Onasch T B Jayne J T Worsnop D R China S Sharma N Mazzoleni C Xu L Ng N L Liu D T Allan J D Lee J D Fleming Z L Mohr C Zotter P Szidat S Prévôt A S H. Nat. Commun.2015, 6: 8435.

[24]
Fierce L Onasch T B Cappa C D Mazzoleni C China S Bhandari J Davidovits P Al Fischer D Helgestad T Lambe A T Sedlacek A J III Smith G D Wolff L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2020117(10): 5196.

[25]
Wang Y Y Li W J Huang J Liu L Pang Y E He C L Liu F S Liu D T Bi L Zhang X Y Shi Z B. Geophys. Res. Lett.202148(24): e2021GL096437.

[26]
Zhang P Chen T Z Ma Q X Chu B W Wang Y H Mu Y J Yu Y B He H. Nat. Commun.2022, 13: 5364.

[27]
Scarnato B V Vahidinia S Richard D T Kirchstetter T W. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201313(10): 5089.

[28]
Kelesidis G A Neubauer D Fan L S Lohmann U Pratsinis S E. Environ. Sci. Technol.202256(12): 8610.

[29]
Chen C Fan X L Shaltout T Qiu C Ma Y Goldman A Khalizov A F. Geophys. Res. Lett.201643(20): 11080.

[30]
Chen C Enekwizu O Y Fan X L Dobrzanski C D Ivanova E V Ma Y Gor G Y Khalizov A F. Environ. Sci. Technol.201852(24): 14169.

[31]
Fu Y Z Peng X C Sun W Hu X D Wang D Yang Y X Guo Z Y Wang Y Y Zhang G H Zhu J X Ou J Shi Z B Wang X M Bi X H. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2022127(21): e2022JD037169.

[32]
Zhang Y X Zhang Q Cheng Y F Su H Kecorius S Wang Z B Wu Z J Hu M Zhu T Wiedensohler A He K B. Atmos. Meas. Tech.20169(4): 1833.

[33]
Wang Y Y Liu F S He C L Bi L Cheng T H Wang Z L Zhang H Zhang X Y Shi Z B Li W J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.20174(11): 487.

[34]
Park K Cao F Kittelson D B McMurry P H. Environ. Sci. Technol.200337(3): 577.

[35]
Pang Y E Wang Y Y Wang Z C Zhang Y X Liu L Kong S F Liu F S Shi Z B Li W J. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2022127(5): e2021JD036055.

[36]
Khalizov A F Lin Y Qiu C Guo S Collins D Zhang R Y. Environ. Sci. Technol.201347(5): 2254.

[37]
Pei X Y Hallquist M Eriksson A C Pagels J Donahue N M Mentel T Svenningsson B Brune W Pathak R K. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201818(13): 9845.

[38]
Hentschel M Page N. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.200320(1): 25.

[39]
Johnson T J Symonds J P R Olfert J S Boies A M. Aerosol Sci. Technol.202155(2): 119.

[40]
Sang-Nourpour N Olfert J S. J. Aerosol. Sci.2019, 138.

[41]
Song Y Pei X Y Liu H Zhou J J Wang Z. Atmos. Meas. Tech.202215(11): 3513.

[42]
Tavakoli F Olfert J S. J. Aerosol Sci.2014, 75: 35.

[43]
Gysel M Laborde M Olfert J S Subramanian R Gröhn A J. Atmos. Meas. Tech.20114(12): 2851.

[44]
Lee S Y Chang H Ogi T Iskandar F Okuyama K. Carbon201149(7): 2163.

[45]
Rissler J Messing M E Malik A I Nilsson P T Nordin E Z Bohgard M Sanati M Pagels J H. Aerosol. Sci. Technol.201347(7): 792.

[46]
Wu Y F Xia Y J Huang R J Deng Z Z Tian P Xia X G Zhang R J. Atmos. Meas. Tech.201912(8): 4347.

[47]
Canagaratna M R Massoli P Browne E C Franklin J P Wilson K R Onasch T B Kirchstetter T W Fortner E C Kolb C E Jayne J T Kroll J H Worsnop D R. J. Phys. Chem. A2015119(19): 4589.

[48]
Fortner E Onasch T Canagaratna M Williams L R Lee T Jayne J Worsnop D. J. Aerosol Sci.2018, 120: 12.

[49]
Healy R M Wang J M Jeong C H Lee A K Y Willis M D Jaroudi E Zimmerman N Hilker N Murphy M Eckhardt S Stohl A Abbatt J P D Wenger J C Evans G J. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2015120(13): 6619.

[50]
Malmborg V B Eriksson A C Török S Zhang Y L Kling K Martinsson J Fortner E C Gren L Kook S Onasch T B Bengtsson P E Pagels J. Carbon2019, 142: 535.

[51]
Onasch T B Fortner E C Trimborn A M Lambe A T Tiwari A J Marr L C Corbin J C Mensah A A Williams L R Davidovits P Worsnop D R. Aerosol Sci. Technol.201549(6): 409.

[52]
Onasch T B Trimborn A Fortner E C Jayne J T Kok G L Williams L R Davidovits P Worsnop D R. Aerosol Sci. Technol.201246(7): 804.

[53]
Willis M D Lee A K Y Onasch T Fortner E Williams L R Lambe A T Worsnop D R Abbatt J P D. AerosolMeas. Tech.20147(12): 4507.

[54]
Katrib Y Martin S T Hung H M Rudich Y Zhang H Z Slowik J G Davidovits P Jayne J T Worsnop D R. J. Phys. Chem. A2004108(32): 6686.

[55]
Lee A K Y Chen C L Liu J Price D J Betha R Russell L M Zhang X L Cappa C D. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201717(24): 15055.

[56]
Wei J Niu Y B Tang M X Peng Y Cao L M He L Y Huang X F. Sci. Total Environ.2023, 859: 160290.

[57]
Wei J Huang X F Peng Y Lin X Y Lei Z H Cao L M Zhu W F Guo S He L Y. Environ. Pollut.2023, 324: 121380.

[58]
Ebert M Inerle-Hof M Weinbruch S. Atmos. Environ.200236(39/40): 5909.

[59]
Köllensperger G Friedbacher G Kotzick R Niessner R Grasserbauer M. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem.1999364(4): 296.

[60]
Rissler J Pagels J Swietlicki E Wierzbicka A Strand M Lillieblad L Sanati M Bohgard M. Aerosol Sci. Technol.200539(10): 919.

[61]
Yuan Z Q Huang J Peng C Y Wang M L Wang X Bin J P Xing S L Xiao J Y Zeng J C Xiao X M Fu X Gong H F Zhao D J Chen H. Appl. Phys. A2016122(2): 125.

[62]
Kameya Y Lee K O. Energy Technol.20131(11): 695.

[63]
Schulz F Commodo M Kaiser K De Falco G Minutolo P Meyer G D`Anna A Gross L. Proc. Combust. Inst.201937(1): 885.

[64]
Barone A C D’Alessio A D’Anna A. Combust. Flame2003132(1/2): 181.

[65]
Commodo M Kaiser K De Falco G Minutolo P Schulz F D’Anna A Gross L. Combust. Flame2019, 205: 154.

[66]
Abid A D Tolmachoff E D Phares D J Wang H Liu Y Laskin A. Proc. Combust. Inst.200932(1): 681.

[67]
Zhang J Wang Y Y Teng X M Liu L Xu Y S Ren L H Shi Z B Zhang Y Jiang J K Liu D T Hu M Shao L Y Chen J M Martin S T Zhang X Y Li W J. Commun. Earth Environ.2022, 3: 128.

[68]
Sarangi B Ramachandran S Rajesh T A Dhaker V K. Atmos. Environ.2019, 200: 110.

[69]
Schneider J Weimer S Drewnick F Borrmann S Helas G Gwaze P Schmid O Andreae M O Kirchner U. Int. J. Mass Spectrom.2006258(1/3): 37.

[70]
Yuan C Zheng J Ma Y Jiang Y L Li Y L Wang Z Q. Environ. Pollut.2020, 262: 114172.

[71]
Cheng M Q Kuwata M. J. Aerosol Sci.2023, 168: 106111.

[72]
Ma X F Zangmeister C D Gigault J Mulholland G W Zachariah M R. J. Aerosol Sci.2013, 66: 209.

[73]
Schnitzler E G Dutt A Charbonneau A M Olfert J S Jäger W. Environ. Sci. Technol.201448(24): 14309.

[74]
Ghazi R Tjong H Soewono A Rogak S N Olfert J S. Aerosol Sci. Technol.201347(4): 395.

[75]
Rissler J Swietlicki E Bengtsson A Boman C Pagels J Sandstrom T Blomberg A Londahl J. Aerosol Sci.2012, 48: 18.

[76]
Pei X Y Hallquist M Eriksson A C Pagels J Donahue N M Mentel T Svenningsson B Brune W Pathak R K. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201818(13): 9845.

[77]
Bond T C Streets D G Yarber K F Nelson S M Woo J H Klimont Z. J. Geophys. Res.2004109(D14): D14203.

[78]
Penner J E Eddleman H Novakov T. Atmos. Environ. Part A Gen. Top.199327(8): 1277.

[79]
Khalizov A F Zhang R Y Zhang D Xue H X Pagels J McMurry P H. J. Geophys. Res.2009114(D5): D05208.

[80]
Li K N Ye X N Pang H W Lu X H Chen H Wang X F Yang X Chen J M Chen Y J. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201818(20): 15201.

[81]
Broda K N Olfert J S Irwin M Schill G P McMeeking G R Schnitzler E G Jäger W. Aerosol Sci. Technol.201852(5): 567.

[82]
Liu H Pan X L Wang D W Liu X Y Tian Y Yao W J Lei S D Zhang Y T Li J Lei L Xie C H Fu P Q Sun Y L Wang Z F. Atmos. Res.2022, 265: 105867.

[83]
Naseri A Sipkens T A Rogak S N Olfert J S. Aerosol Sci. Technol.202155(1): 104.

[84]
Liu D T Whitehead J Alfarra M R Reyes-Villegas E Spracklen D V Reddington C L Kong S F Williams P I Ting Y C Haslett S Taylor J W Flynn M J Morgan W T McFiggans G Coe H Allan J D. Nat. Geosci.201710(3): 184.

[85]
Radney J G You R A Ma X F Conny J M Zachariah M R Hodges J T Zangmeister C D. Environ. Sci. Technol.201448(6): 3169.

[86]
Huang X F Peng Y Wei J Peng J F Lin X Y Tang M X Cheng Y Men Z Y Fang T G Zhang J S He L Y Cao L M Liu C Zhang C C Mao H J Seinfeld J H Wang Y. One Earth20247(1): 136.

[87]
Miljevic B Surawski N C Bostrom T Ristovski Z D. J. Aerosol Sci.2012, 47: 48.

[88]
Corbin J C Modini R L Gysel-Beer M. Aerosol Sci. Technol.202357(2): 89.

[89]
Enekwizu O Y Hasani A Khalizov A F. Environ. Sci. Technol.202155(13): 8622.

[90]
Li M Bao F X Zhang Y Sheng H Chen C C Zhao J C. Environ. Sci. Technol.201953(21): 12311.

[91]
Mikhailov E F Vlasenko S S Krämer L Niessner R. J. Aerosol Sci.200132(6): 697.

[92]
Brauer M Avila-Casado C Fortoul T I Vedal S Stevens B Churg A. Environ. Health Perspect.2001109(10): 1039.

[93]
Lack D A Cappa C D. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201010(9): 4207.

[94]
Cheng T H Wu Y Gu X F Chen H. Opt. Express201523(8): 10808.

[95]
Cheng Y F Berghof M Garland R M Wiedensohler A Wehner B Mueller T Su H Zhang Y H Achtert P Nowak A Poeschl U Zhu T Hu M Zeng L M. Geophys. Res-Atmos.2009114(D2).

[96]
Dong J Zhao J M Liu L H. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.2015, 165: 43.

[97]
Qiu C Khalizov A F Zhang R Y. Environ. Sci. Technol.201246(17): 9464.

[98]
Slowik J G Cross E S Han J H Davidovits P Onasch T B Jayne J T Williams L R Canagaratna M R Worsnop D R Chakrabarty R K Moosmüller H Arnott W P Schwarz J P Gao R S Fahey D W Kok G L Petzold A. Aerosol Sci. Technol.200741(3): 295.

[99]
Zhang R Y Khalizov A F Pagels J Zhang D Xue H X McMurry P H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.2008105(30): 10291.

[100]
Marcolli C Krieger U K. J. Phys. Chem. A2006110(5): 1881.

[101]
Brunamonti S Krieger U K Marcolli C Peter T. Geophys. Res. Lett.201542(7): 2532.

[102]
Bertram A K Martin S T Hanna S J Smith M L Bodsworth A Chen Q Kuwata M Liu A You Y Zorn S R. Atmos. Chem. Phys.201111(21): 10995.

[103]
Yuan Q Wang Y Y Chen Y X Yue S Y Zhang J Zhang Y X Xu L Hu W Liu D T Fu P Q Gao H W Li W J. Atmos. Chem. Phys.202323(16): 9385.

[104]
Slowik J G Cross E S Han J H Kolucki J Davidovits P Williams L R Onasch T B Jayne J T Kolb C E Worsnop D R. Aerosol Sci. Technol.200741(8): 734.

[105]
Chen X Y Ye C X Wang Y Y Wu Z J Zhu T Zhang F Ding X K Shi Z B Zheng Z H Li W J. iScience202326(11): 108125.

[106]
Farias T L, Köylü, Carvalho M G. Appl. Opt.199635(33): 6560.

[107]
Mackowski D W Mishchenko M I. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.2011112(13): 2182.

[108]
Li J Liu C Yin Y Kumar K R. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2016121(7): 3506.

[109]
Liu C Li J Yin Y Zhu B Feng Q. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.2017, 187: 443.

[110]
Feng X. Master's Dissertation of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology2021 .

(冯雪. 南京信息工程大学硕士论文2021.).

[111]
Leung K K Schnitzler E G Jäger W Olfert J S. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.20174(9): 386.

[112]
Chen C. Doctoral Dissertation of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology2018.

(陈超. 南京信息工程大学博士论文2018.).

[113]
Lack D A Langridge J M Bahreini R Cappa C D Middlebrook A M Schwarz J P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.2012109(37): 14802.

[114]
Zhang X L Mao M Yin Y Wang B. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.2018123(2): 1297.

[115]
Adachi K Chung S H Buseck P R. J. Geophys. Res.2010115(D15): D15206.

Options
Outlines

/