Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Methanol and Machine Learning Assistance
Received date: 2025-03-19
Revised date: 2025-04-15
Online published: 2025-09-01
Supported by
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(51908457)
With the increasing global emphasis on carbon dioxide emissions reduction, electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction (ECO2R) to methanol has garnered significant attention within the context of carbon neutrality. However, existing ECO2R catalysts still suffer from limitations in activity, selectivity, and stability, thereby constraining their practical applications. This underscores the urgent need for the development of highly efficient catalysts, which remains a central research focus in this field. Traditional catalyst design predominantly relies on trial-and-error approaches, which are inherently inefficient. Therefore, novel strategies are required to accelerate catalyst discovery and optimization. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool to drive catalyst development. This review systematically summarizes the reaction mechanisms underlying ECO2R to methanol and highlights recent advancements in catalyst research, encompassing Cu-based, non-Cu-based, and phthalocyanine-based catalysts. Furthermore, the fundamental framework of machine learning applications in this domain is introduced, covering key stages from data acquisition to model validation. Particular emphasis is placed on machine learning-driven predictions of catalytic activity, catalyst design, and performance optimization. Although machine learning has made remarkable progress in ECO2R research, there are still several challenges, including data scarcity, insufficient model interpretability, and the lack of a universal prediction framework. Future research should focus on the establishment of high-quality catalyst databases, enhancement of model interpretability, and improvement of generalization capabilities. This review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on ECO2R catalyst design while emphasizing the pivotal role of machine learning in facilitating breakthroughs in this field.
1 Introduction
2 Reaction mechanism of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to methanol
2.1 Reduction of carbon dioxide to two‑electron products
2.2 Further conversion of carbon monoxide intermediates
3 Electrocatalysts for the reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol
3.1 Copper‑based catalysts
3.2 Non‑copper‑based catalysts
3.3 Phthalocyanine‑based catalysts
3.4 Design principles and performance regulation of catalysts
4 Machine learning-assisted electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol
4.1 Basic procedures of machine learning application
4.2 Machine learning empowering the design of carbon dioxide to methanol catalysts
5 Challenges and prospects
5.1 Improve catalyst stability
5.2 In-depth analysis of reaction mechanisms
5.3 Optimize reactor structure
5.4 Machine learning-assisted catalyst design
Sun Ruyu , Qi Man , Zhao Yawen , Lv Yongli , Wang Li , Yan Wei . Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Methanol and Machine Learning Assistance[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2025 , 37(9) : 1274 -1289 . DOI: 10.7536/PC20250311
表1 ECO2R制甲醇催化剂性能比较Table 1 Comparison of Catalyst Performance for Producing Methanol by ECO2R |
| Type | Catalyst | Potential [V (vs RHE)] | J (mA·cm-2) | FEMethanol (%) | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-based | CuOx-based | Cu2O/CuO | -1.3 (vs Ag/AgCl) | 46 | 6.46 | 51 |
| CuO NWs | -1.4 (vs Ag/AgCl/Sat. KCl) | - | 66.4 | 52 | ||
| Cu2O-o | -0.3 | - | 4.9 | 53 | ||
| Sn1/Vo-CuO-90 | -2.0 (vs Ag/AgCl) | 67.0 | 88.6 | 54 | ||
| Copper alloy | Ag,S-Cu2O/Cu | - | 122.7 | 67.4 | 55 | |
| Cu-Co PBA-VCN | -0.9 | 10.8 | 39.2 | 56 | ||
| Other copper-based | Ti3(Al1-xCux)C2 | -1.4 | 21.3 | 59.1 | 34 | |
| Cu-g-C3N4/MoS2 | -1.4 (vs Ag/AgCl) | 78 | 19.7 | 57 | ||
| CuO-ZnO-MoS2 | -0.6 | 38 | 24.6 | 58 | ||
| -1.2 (vs Ag/AgCl) | 121 | - | ||||
| Cu2O/NC | -0.55 | - | 52 | 59 | ||
| CuGa2 | -0.3 | 21.4 | 77.26 | 60 | ||
| np-Cu(Se-5%) | -0.5 | - | 58 | 61 | ||
| Cu58-I NC | -0.7 | - | 54 | 62 | ||
| Cu2NCN | - | 92.3 | Sel.=70% | 63 | ||
| Non-Cu-based | PtxZn/C | -0.9 | - | 81.4 | 64 | |
| Pd1.80%/MnO2 | 3.2 V (cell voltage) | 250.8 | 77.6 | 65 | ||
| CoO/CN/Ni | -0.7 | 10.6 | 70.7 | 66 | ||
| C-Py-Sn-Zn | -0.5 | - | 59.9 | 67 | ||
| Mo2C/N-CNT | -1.1 (vs SHE) | - | 80.4 | 68 | ||
| Pyr-CP-800 | -0.60 | 7.14 | 32.46 | 69 | ||
| C3SH-ZnO | -0.9 | - | 92 | 70 | ||
| Phthalocyanine-based | CoPc/CNT | -0.94 | 10.6 | 44 | 71 | |
| CoTAPc/GCNT | - | >150 | - | 72 | ||
| CoPc/SWCNTs | -0.9 | 66.8 | 31.3 | 73 | ||
| CoTAPc/SW | -0.95 | 6 | 51.5 | 74 | ||
图2 典型铜基催化剂性能及结构示意图:(a) 不同Cu2O催化剂的TEM图像及对应产物的FE[53];(b) 不同双掺杂催化剂的性能及甲醇分电流密度与催化剂吉布斯自由能差关系图[55];(c) SA-Cu-MXene作为单原子铜催化剂实现二氧化碳高效制甲醇及其FE图[34];(d) Cu2NCN表面反应示意图及其在MEA的电解槽中ECO2R产物分布[63]Fig.2 Schematic diagram of typical copper based catalyst performance and structure. (a) TEM images of different Cu2O catalysts and FE of corresponding products[53]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (b) The properties of different double-doped catalysts and the relationship between methanol partial current density and catalyst Gibbs free energy difference[55]. (c) SA-Cu-MXene as a single atomic copper catalyst to achieve efficient methanol production from carbon dioxide and its FE pattern[34]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic diagram of Cu2NCN surface reaction and its distribution of ECO2R products in an electrolytic cell of MEA[63] |
图3 典型非铜基催化剂性能及结构示意图:(a) Pd1.80%/MnO2在MEA电解槽中耦合OER的电催化性能[65];(b) CoO/CN/Ni和CoO/CN催化剂的机理示意图[66];(c) Mo2C/N-CNT制备流程图[68];(d) Pyr-CP-600和Pyr-CP-800材料的合成路线的示意图[69]Fig.3 Schematic diagram of properties and structures of typical non-copper based catalysts. (a) Electrocatalytic performance of Pd1.80%/MnO2 in an MEA electrolyzer by coupling OER[65]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic show about the mechanism of the catalysts CoO/CN/Ni and CoO/CN[66]. (c) Mo2C/N-CNT preparation flow chart[68]. (d) Schematic illustration of the synthetic route of Pyr-CP-600 and Pyr-CP-800 materials[69] |
图4 典型酞菁催化剂性能及结构示意图:(a) 两种CoTAPc@1V-Gr模型的示意图,对应的*CO结合构型以及主要产物[72];(b) CoPc/SWCNTs催化剂表面反应示意图[73];(c) 催化剂电催化二氧化碳还原性能[74];(d) *CoTAPc和FePc不同界面构型的CO结合能[74]Fig.4 Properties and structure diagram of typical phthalocyanine catalysts. (a) Schematic illustration of two CoTAPc@1V-Gr models, their corresponding *CO binding configurations, and the predominant products[72] (Haozhou Yang et al, Potential-driven structural distortion in cobalt phthalocyanine for electrocatalytic CO2/CO reduction towards methanol. Nature Communications, published 2024, Springer Nature). (b) Diagram of surface reaction of CoPc/SWCNTs catalyst[73]. (c) Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction performance of catalyst[74]. (d) *CO binding energy of different interface configurations of CoTAPc and FePc[74] |
图6 (a) ECO2R催化剂活性筛选[82];(b) SAC@UiO-66-X催化剂上生成HCOOH、CO和CH4/CH3OH的计算极限电位[83]Fig.6 (a) Screening of ECO2R catalyst activity[82]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (b) The calculated limiting potentials for the formation of HCOOH, CO, and CH4/CH3OH on the SAC@UiO-66-X catalyst[83]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society |
图7 (a) DACs@2D对CH4/CH3OH产物的计算起始电位(UCH4/CH3OHonset);(b) UCH4/CH3OHonset与描述符φi和φ1的火山图;(c) DACs@2D对HCOOH产物的计算起始电位(UHCOOHonset);(d) UHCOOHonset与描述符φ2的火山图[84]Fig.7 (a) Calculated onset potentials of DACs@2D toward the CH4/CH3OH product (UCH4/CH3OHonset); (b) volcano plot for UCH4/CH3OHonset versus the descriptor φi and φ1; (c) calculated onset potentials of DACs@2D toward HCOOH product (UHCOOHonset); (d) volcano plot for UHCOOHonset versus the descriptor φ2[84]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society |
图8 (a) 通过微观结构筛选催化剂流程图[86];(b) 通过不同吸附位点间的关联筛选催化剂流程图[87]Fig. 8 (a) Flow chart of catalyst screening by microstructure[86]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (b) Flowchart of catalyst screening through the correlation between different adsorption sites[87]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
( 李歌, 马子然, 闾菲, 彭胜攀, 佟振伟. 材料导报, 2025, 39(01): 160).
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |