Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments

Yao Kebing, Yu Julong, Zhang Guo, Zhao Laicheng, Miao Kang, Shu Zhaolin, Yang Hongfu, Xu Chao, Zhu Feng

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) : 13-17.

PDF(1276 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1276 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) : 13-17. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200300047

Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To clarify the control effect of thiofuramide seed treatment on rice sheath blight and its impact on rice growth, and provide a basis for its popularization and application, 24% thiofuramide SC was used as the experimental material, and three seed treatment methods, including seed soaking, wet mixing and dry mixing were conducted, and each method was set with five treatments of 150, 300, 450, 600 ai.g/hm2 and CK, to determine the control effect on rice sheath blight and safety on rice seed. The results showed that the control effect on sheath blight by wet mixing was 90.46%-98.10% when seeds were treated with 24% thifluzamide 150-600 ai.g/hm2 after 91 days. The control effect on sheath blight by dry mix treatment was 91.16%-99.28%. The control effect on sheath blight was poor when seeds were treated by soaking. The effect of each treatment on rice sheath blight slightly decreased after 108 days, but the trend was basically the same as 91 days after sowing. At the same time, all treatments had no adverse effect on rice germination, emergence and growth. Therefore, rice seed treatment with 24% thifluzamide SC should be used by wet mixing or dry mixing. In addition, from the perspective of control effect and economic cost, the recommended concentration should be 300-450 ai.g/hm2, which has a good control effect on rice sheath blight and a long efficacy, and is safe for rice growth.

Key words

Rice Sheath Blight / Thifluzamide / Seed Treatment / Control Effect / Safety Evaluation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yao Kebing , Yu Julong , Zhang Guo , et al . Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2021, 11(7): 13-17 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200300047

References

[1]
孟庆忠, 刘志恒, 王鹤影, 等. 水稻纹枯病研究进展[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2001, 32(5):376-381.
[2]
孙雪. 水稻纹枯病的防治技术研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2015.
[3]
刘长令. 世界农药大全(杀菌剂卷)[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005:90-92.
[4]
孙春来, 陈怀谷, 吉用铨, 等. 噻呋酰胺等杀菌剂防治小麦纹枯病田间试验[J]. 现代农药, 2012, 11(6):42-44.
[5]
关立松. 240g/L满穗悬浮剂防治小麦纹枯病药效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(8):94-99.
[6]
陈会柱, 钱国华. 24%噻呋酰胺悬浮剂(满穗)对水稻纹枯病的药效试验[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2006, 25(8):1-3.
[7]
甄洁, 张建军, 朱信函, 等. 噻呋酰胺24%悬浮剂防治水稻纹枯病试验[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2009, 30(3):30.
[8]
Magalhaes L C, Hunt T E, Siegfried B D. Efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments to reduce soybean aphid populations under field and controlled conditions in Nebraska[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2009, 102(1):187-195.
The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is native to Asia and was recently (2000) detected in North America. Since then, it has become a significant threat to U.S. soybean production. Although neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, have been suggested as a method of control, the season-long efficacy is still uncertain. Therefore, the use of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments to control soybean aphid in Nebraska were examined. Soybean aphid populations were monitored weekly in an irrigated field study planted during the later half of the typical Nebraska planting window during 2005 and 2006. Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were quantified by leaves through time, and leaf specific bioassays were conducted. In 2005, aphid populations were very low; however, in 2006 aphid numbers were significantly higher than 2005, reaching approximately 1,200 aphids per plant in the untreated plots. Aphid injury significantly reduced yield and individual seed size in 2006. Imidacloprid significantly reduced aphid densities in 2006 but not below the economic threshold. In 2006, thiamethoxam held aphid densities below the economic threshold. Leaf specific bioassays and leaf specific imidacloprid and thiamethoxam quantification indicated that thiamethoxam was present in the plant at higher concentrations and for a longer period.
[9]
Worrall D, Holroyd G H, Moore J P, et al. Treating seeds with activators of plant defence generates long-lasting priming of resistance to pests and pathogens[J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 93(3):770-778.
[10]
束兆林, 糜林, 杨金生, 等. 吡虫啉拌种控制棉虫作用及其促长保产效应[J]. 农药, 1997, 36(2):39-40.
[11]
张文丹, 刘磊, 渠成, 等. 不同杀虫剂对花生蚜毒力及拌种控制效果研究[J]. 花生学报, 2015, 44(1):29-33.
[12]
徐蕾, 赵彤华, 钟涛, 等. 药剂包衣对苗期大豆蚜防治效果与安全性评价[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2016, 53(4):759-771.
[13]
吉沐祥, 陈宏州, 吴祥, 等. 噻呋酰胺与氟环唑及其混配对水稻纹枯病菌抑菌作用[J]. 农学学报, 2014, 4(1):15-18.
[14]
朱凤, 杨荣明, 吴佳文, 等. 水稻纹枯病防治药剂筛选和应用技术研究[J]. 现代农药, 2013, 12(2):48-50.
[15]
陈瑾, 吴如建, 胡菡青, 等. 6种嘧菌酯复配剂对水稻纹枯病的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(18):162-167.
[16]
傅福全, 陈久利, 范仰东. 24%噻呋酰胺(满穗)悬浮剂防治水稻纹枯病效果研究[J]. 植物保护学, 2013(1):124-125.
[17]
齐永志, 李海燕, 苏媛, 等. 小麦纹枯病菌对噻呋酰胺的敏感性及抗药性突变体的主要生物学性状[J]. 农药学学报, 2014(3):271-280.
[18]
任学祥, 叶正和, 丁克坚, 等. 噻呋酰胺种衣剂防治小麦纹枯病效果及安全性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(11):1588-1591.
[19]
杨克泽, 马金慧, 任宝仓. 种子包衣防治玉米瘤黑粉病药效试验[J]. 农药, 2016(10):764-766.
[20]
张楠, 杨峻, 王晓军, 等. 中国种子处理剂登记概况及常见问题[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2018: 39(6):16-20,25.
[21]
付佑胜, 赵桂东, 刘伟中. 70%噻虫嗪WS对水稻壮苗及稻飞虱的防治效果[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(4):54-457.
[22]
束兆林, 缪康, 吉沐祥, 等. 包虫清对水稻前期害虫的控制效果及安全性[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2005, 14(1):59-64.
[23]
杨红福, 束兆林, 陈宏州, 等. 20%咪鲜胺·噻唑膦·戊唑醇悬浮剂对水稻种传病害防治效果[J]. 农药, 2018, 57(7):536-538.
[24]
Hummel N A, Mészáros A, Ring D R, et al. Evaluation of seed treatment insecticides for management of the rice water weevil, Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, Kuschel (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in commercial rice fields in Louisiana[J]. Crop Protection, 2014, 65:37-42.
[25]
Lanka S K, Ottea J A, Davis J A, et al. Systemic effects of thiamethoxam and chlorantraniliprole seed treatments on adult Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice[J]. Pest Management Science, 2013, 69(2):250-256.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021. Chinese Agricultural Association. All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Chinese Agricultural Association or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.
PDF(1276 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/