Impact of Soil Conditioner on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Urban Relocation Sites

WANGRuonan, XUBing, LIANGJing, WUHaibing

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : 22-27.

PDF(1313 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1313 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : 22-27. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0169

Impact of Soil Conditioner on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Urban Relocation Sites

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As the basis for plant growth, soil quality directly determines the success or failure of landscaping in urban areas. To understand the impact of conditioners on soil quality, we selected typical relocation site soil as the research object, and studied the impact on physical and chemical properties of the soil under different conditioners, different application methods and different time. The results showed that after applying different conditioners, each conditioner could effectively reduce the pH and increase the EC value of the relocated soil within a period of time, while the organic matter and total nitrogen of the soil had a tendency of decreasing to a certain extent, among which the decrease of Fe-S treatment was the most significant, while other treatments were not obvious; the impact of each conditioner on soil physical properties did not demonstrate clear improvement, which was mainly observed in the reduction of total soil porosity, non-capillary porosity and capillary porosity, increase of soil bulk density, decrease of soil infiltration rate, maximum water holding capacity and capillary water holding capacity. And among these treatments, M-S showed relatively poorer results; each treatment reduced the seed germination index, but the difference was not obvious, and the Fe-I treatment had poorer results than other treatments. The application of conditioner can improve the chemical properties of the soil in urban relocation site to a certain extent, but it is not obvious to improve the physical properties of the soil. Therefore, to achieve the desired effect of improving both the physical and chemical properties of the soil, it is suggested that the conditioner should be mixed with organic amendment materials.

Key words

soil quality / soil conditioner / urban relocation site / physical properties of the soil / chemical properties of the soil / landscape gardening

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Ruonan , XU Bing , LIANG Jing , et al. Impact of Soil Conditioner on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Urban Relocation Sites[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(4): 22-27 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0169

References

[1]
张浪. 谈新时期城市困难立地绿化[J]. 园林, 2018(1):2-7.
[2]
陈平, 张浪, 李跃忠, 等. 基于园林绿化用途城市搬迁地土壤质量评价的思考[J]. 园林, 2019(8):78-82.
[3]
伍海兵, 何小丽, 梁晶. 园林绿化用搬迁地土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(5):1076-1081.
[4]
梁晶, 伍海兵, 张浪. 城市典型搬迁地土壤质量特征及绿化障碍因子研究[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(12):38-42.
[5]
项建光, 方海兰, 杨意, 等. 上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J]. 土壤, 2004(4):424-429.
[6]
方海兰, 陈玲, 黄懿珍, 等. 上海新建绿地的土壤质量现状和对策[J]. 林业科学, 2007(S1):89-94.
[7]
郝瑞军. 上海城市绿地土壤肥力特征分析与评价[J]. 上海农业学报, 2014, 30(1):79-84.
[8]
徐冰, 张峰, 梁晶. 不同土壤调理剂对城市搬迁地土壤pH值影响研究[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(5):94-99.
[9]
伍海兵, 梁晶, 陈平, 等. 湿垃圾沼渣对城市搬迁地土壤水库特征的影响研究[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(10):45-50.
[10]
向文明, 孙媛, 周富忠. 土壤调理剂的种类、作用及科学使用[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2021(13):70-72.
[11]
吴荣, 刘善江, 孙昊, 等. 长期定位不同施肥方式对土壤肥力和微生物的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(4):12-18.
[12]
石刚, 庞巧莲, 李文燕, 等. 土壤调理剂的应用现状及前景[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(24):138-139.
[13]
郑冰. 不同施肥模式对园林绿地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2021(2):16-19.
[14]
伍海兵, 张青青, 梁晶. 城市绿地土壤肥力质量综合评价方法初探[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(4):795-800.
[15]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. LY/T 1239—1999,森林土壤pH的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[16]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. LY/T 1251—1999,森林土壤水溶性盐分的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[17]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. LY/T 1237—1999,森林土壤有机质的测定及碳氮比的计算[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[18]
国家林业局. LY/T 1228—2015,森林土壤氮的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[19]
住房和城乡建设部风景园林标准化技术委员会. CJ/T 340—2016,绿化种植土壤[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[20]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. LY/T 1215—1999,森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[21]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. LY/T 1218—1999,森林土壤渗滤率的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[22]
金大成, 沈烈英, 方海兰, 等. 绿化种植土质量标准创新实践:上海国际旅游度假区绿化建设案例[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2017.
[23]
章少辉, 许迪, 白美建, 等. 畦灌条件下液施与撒施硫酸铵施肥性能评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22):103-107.
[24]
方海兰, 钱杰, 梁晶, 等. 上海园林绿化土壤[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
[25]
方海兰. 城市土壤生态功能与有机废弃物循环利用[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2014.1.
[26]
方海兰, 徐忠, 张浪, 等. 园林绿化土壤质量标准及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.6.
[27]
艾海舰. 土壤持水性及孔性的影响因素浅析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2002(3):75-79.
PDF(1313 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/