PDF(1286 KB)
Effect of Planting Density on Yield and Quality Traits of a New Weak Gluten Wheat Variety 'Yunmai 114'
TIANJingmei, LIUJia, YANGXiaoyun, LIShaoxiang, ZHANGCuiping, ZHANGLin, LIUKun, ZHURunyun, DINGMingliang
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 14-21.
PDF(1286 KB)
PDF(1286 KB)
Effect of Planting Density on Yield and Quality Traits of a New Weak Gluten Wheat Variety 'Yunmai 114'
The study aims to investigate the impact of planting density on the yield and quality of the newly approved high-quality weak gluten wheat variety 'Yunmai 114' in Yunnan, providing a theoretical basis for determining a reasonable planting density for the large-scale promotion of weak gluten wheat varieties in Yunnan. Using 'Yunmai 114' as the experimental material, seven treatments including 900000 plants/hm2 (A), 1.35 million plants/hm2 (B), 1.8 million plants/hm2 (C), 2.25 million plants/hm2 (D), 2.7 million plants/hm2 (E), 3.15 million plants/hm2 (F), and 3.6 million plants/hm2 (G) were set up for basic seedlings, with three replicates and incomplete random block arrangement. The yield and yield related traits, grain type traits, quality traits and stem tiller dynamics of the variety were investigated under different planting densities, and variance analysis and correlation analysis were conducted on these traits. The highest number of tillers, effective panicles, and the number of tillers in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh leaf stages of 'Yunmai 114' showed extremely distinct differences at 7 planting densities. There were also significant differences in spike rate, grain number, plant height, water absorption rate, protein content, stable time, formation time, and hardness value at each planting density. However, there were no significant differences in theoretical yield, actual yield, thousand grain weight, grain area, grain circumference, grain length to width ratio, and grain length and width among different planting densities. The changes in both theoretical and actual yields showed a trend of first increasing, then decreasing, then increasing, and finally decreasing with the increase of planting density. There was a highly significant positive correlation (r=0.778**, 0.908**, 0.767**, 0.924**, 0.850**, and 0.752**) between the effective panicle, the number of tillers in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh leaf stages of the variety and its basic seedlings. The plant height and theoretical yield were significantly positively correlated with their basic seedlings (r=0.536* and 0.520*). There was a significant negative correlation between the number of grains per panicle, protein content and stability time with their basic seedlings (r=-0.450*, -0.449*, and -0.467*), while there was a certain correlation but not significant between actual yield and 16 other traits with the basic seedlings. Planting density could significantly affect the number of tillers in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh leaf stages, highest tiller number, effective panicle, spike rate, grain number, plant height, water absorption rate, protein content, stability time, formation time, and hardness value of 'Yunmai 114', but it did not significantly affect the theoretical yield, actual yield, thousand grain weight, grain area, grain circumference, and grain length to width ratio, grain length and grain width. Moreover, a low planting density was not conducive to the performance of the yield and quality characteristics of the variety. When the basic seedlings were 1.35 million -3.6 million plants/hm2, the yield of the variety remained stable at 14389.50-16078.50 kg/hm2, maintaining good yield and stability, as well as maintaining the quality characteristics of weak gluten wheat. These planting densities are suitable for promotion in areas with better water and fertilizer conditions in Yunnan.
'Yunmai 114' / weak gluten wheat / planting density / yield traits / quality traits / stem and tiller dynamics
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Wheat ( L.) grain yield response to plant density is inconsistent, and the mechanisms driving this response are unclear. A better understanding of the factors governing this relationship could improve plant density recommendations according to specific environmental and genetics characteristics. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to: i) execute a synthesis-analysis of existing literature related to yield-plant density relationship to provide an indication of the need for different agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) in different yield environments (YEs), and ii) explore a data set of field research studies conducted in Kansas (USA) on yield response to plant density to determine the AOPD at different YEs, evaluate the effect of tillering potential (TP) on the AOPD, and explain changes in AOPD variations in wheat yield components. Major findings of this study are: i) the synthesis-analysis portrayed new insights of differences in AOPD at varying YEs, reducing the AOPD as the attainable yield increases (with AOPD moving from 397 pl m for the low YE to 191 pl m for the high YE); ii) the field dataset confirmed the trend observed in the synthesis-analysis but expanded on the physiological mechanisms underpinning the yield response to plant density for wheat, mainly highlighting the following points: a) high TP reduces the AOPD mainly in high and low YEs, b) at canopy-scale, both final number of heads and kernels per square meter were the main factors improving yield response to plant density under high TP, c) under varying YEs, at per-plant-scale, a compensation between heads per plant and kernels per head was the main factor contributing to yield with different TP.Copyright © 2020 Bastos, Carciochi, Lollato, Jaenisch, Rezende, Schwalbert, Vara Prasad, Zhang, Fritz, Foster, Wright, Young, Bradley and Ciampitti.
|
| [4] |
张晓, 张勇, 高德荣, 等. 中国弱筋小麦育种进展及生产现状[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(1):184-189.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
蒋进, 李小雨, 王淑荣, 等. 不同施氮量对弱筋小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2022, 36(1):9-13.
|
| [7] |
徐家万, 于亚雄, 曾江. 云南省麦类产业发展现状和问题探析[J]. 当代经济, 2017, 34:80-82.
|
| [8] |
胡学旭, 孙丽娟, 周桂英, 等. 2006-2015年中国小麦质量年度变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(16):3063-3072.
【目的】中国小麦由强筋小麦、中强筋小麦、中筋小麦和弱筋小麦4种类型构成，分析近10年来各类型小麦年度质量变化，探讨小麦生产质量现状、存在的问题和解决方法，为小麦生产、科研、购销和加工等环节提供必要的参考。【方法】对2006—2015年中国小麦生产区742个小麦品种7 561份样品的容重、蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量、沉淀指数和面团流变学特性进行测定，分析各类型小麦年度比例和8个主要品质性状年度变化。【结果】小麦品种结构有所改善，但达标样品比例较低。从品种比例看，强筋品种、中强筋品种、中筋品种和弱筋品种比例分别为12.6%、16.7%、68.7%和2.0%，年度间保持稳定。从样品比例看，强筋小麦、中强筋小麦、中筋小麦和弱筋小麦样品比例分别为21.0%、16.9%、49.4%和3.8%；各类型小麦样品比例年度间变化差异较大，年度间强筋小麦和中筋小麦呈此消彼长趋势，中强筋小麦呈缓慢增加趋势，弱筋小麦呈下降趋势。从达标样品比例看，各类型小麦达标比例较低，强筋小麦、中强筋小麦、中筋小麦和弱筋小麦达标比例分别为4.8%、4.6%、25.0%和0.4%。中国小麦总体质量表现为中筋小麦水平，容重、蛋白质含量和湿面筋含量年度间变化趋势不明显，沉淀指数、粉质和拉伸参数呈小幅下降趋势。强筋小麦、中强筋小麦和中筋小麦品质性状年度间保持相对稳定，沉淀指数、粉质和拉伸参数变化趋势基本相同；弱筋小麦近年来蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量和沉淀指数年度平均值增加，品质下降。不同类型小麦品质性状差异较大，容重年度平均值大小依次为中强筋小麦＞强筋小麦＞中筋小麦＞弱筋小麦，蛋白质含量和湿面筋含量年度平均值大小依次为强筋小麦＞中筋小麦＞中强筋小麦＞弱筋小麦，沉淀指数、粉质和拉伸参数年度平均值大小依次为强筋小麦＞中强筋小麦＞中筋小麦、弱筋小麦；年度平均值变幅不同，其中沉淀指数、粉质和拉伸参数年度平均值变幅大小依次为强筋小麦＞中强筋小麦＞中筋小麦、弱筋小麦。【结论】中国小麦品种结构有所改善，各类型小麦达标比例较低，小麦质量有较大提升空间。应通过选育和推广高产优质专用小麦品种、合理增加现有各类型优质小麦品种面积和加大政策扶持力度等途径，优化品种结构，提高小麦质量。
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
丁明亮, 刘佳, 李绍祥, 等. 小麦新品种‘云麦110’产量和品质性状对不同种植密度的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(24):1-7.
为了探明小麦新品种‘云麦110’产量和品质相关性状对种植密度的响应,以该品种为试验材料,采用6个种植密度的单因素随机区组设计,考察该品种在不同密度下的产量与品质相关性状并进行方差分析。结果表明：种植密度对产量及产量三要素均影响显著;对第三、四、五、六、七叶期的茎蘖数均影响显著,但对八叶期的茎蘖数影响不显著;对籽粒周长影响显著,但对其余4个粒型性状影响不显著;对容重影响显著,但对其余8个品质性状影响不显著。当基本苗为270×10<sup>4</sup>/hm<sup>2</sup>时产量最高(6435.00 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>),茎蘖消长最平缓,成穗率最高(25.39%),籽粒周长最大(18.07 mm),容重最高(798.00 g/L)。因此,小麦新品种‘云麦110’产量和品质相关性状对不同种植密度的响应较大,其中基本苗为270×10<sup>4</sup>/hm<sup>2</sup>时该品种产量最高,产量三要素最协调,茎蘖消长最合理,株高适宜,且综合品质性状最好,适宜在该种植密度下推广种植。
|
| [17] |
李欣欣, 石祖梁, 王久臣, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对稻茬晚播小麦干物质积累及光合特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(5):140-148.
旨在为稻茬晚播小麦高产高效栽培提供理论依据，在大田试验条件下，研究了施氮量（0，150，225 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>）和种植密度（150×10<sup>4</sup>，225×10<sup>4</sup>，300×10<sup>4</sup>株/hm<sup>2</sup>）对稻茬晚播小麦旗叶光合特性及干物质积累转运的影响。研究结果表明，全生育期干物质积累量和叶面积指数（LAI）均随施氮量和种植密度的增加而增加，但拔节后干物质积累比例则随种植密度增加而降低。花后干物质积累量、花前干物质转运量均随施氮量的增加而增加，随种植密度的增加呈先增后降的变化特点。不同处理干物质转运量对籽粒产量的贡献率（CDMRG）平均约为40%，干物质转运效率（DMRE）平均约为26%；CDMRG和DMRE均随施氮量的增加而下降，随种植密度的增加亦呈先升后降的变化趋势。旗叶净光合速率（Pn）、气孔导度（Gs）、蒸腾速率（Tr）、最大光化学效率（Fv/Fm）、实际光化学效率（φ<sub>PSⅡ</sub>）、叶绿素相对含量（SPAD值）均随施氮量的增加而升高，随种植密度的增加而降低，胞间CO<sub>2</sub>浓度（Ci）则呈相反的变化趋势。产量及产量构成因素在不同施氮量及种植密度处理下均达极显著差异水平，在本试验条件下，施氮量为225 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>、种植密度为225×10<sup>4</sup>株/hm<sup>2</sup>时，有利于维持稻茬晚播小麦的产量稳定，可作为长江中下游地区稻茬晚播小麦的适宜氮密组合模式。
|
| [18] |
郭丹丹, 刘哲文, 常旭虹, 等. 强筋小麦群体结构、光能利用及籽粒产量对种植密度与追氮模式的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2024, 44(1):82-91.
|
| [19] |
周文银, 李文阳, 李浩杰, 等. 种植密度对小麦籽粒淀粉品质与茎秆抗倒性能的调控效应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(4):108-114.
|
| [20] |
王乐凯, 程爱华, 林作楫, 等. GB/T 17320—2013,小麦品种品质分类京[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
|
| [21] |
徐俊, 姚远, 钱晨诚, 等. 增密减氮对弱筋小麦‘宁麦13’产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14):1-8.
为实现弱筋小麦优质稳产,解决当前弱筋小麦存在品质稳定性差的问题。本试验以弱筋小麦‘宁麦13’为试材,结合方差分析等方法研究增密减氮对弱筋小麦的产量、群体质量指标以及籽粒品质的影响。结果表明,在240 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>施氮水平条件下,随着密度的增加,小麦LAI、干物质积累量均呈先增加后下降的趋势,密度超过240×10<sup>4</sup>/hm<sup>2</sup>会导致LAI、干物质积累量、产量下降。在240×10<sup>4</sup>/hm<sup>2</sup>密度条件下,施氮量超过240 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>会导致小麦叶面积指数、SPAD值、花后干物质积累量和产量下降。适当的增密减氮有利于提高弱筋小麦的优质稳产,而过量增密减氮则会导致小麦产量下降,品质不稳定。为实现产量和品质的最优化,生产上推荐采用种植密度为240×10<sup>4</sup>/hm<sup>2</sup>,施氮量为180 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>,氮肥运筹为7:1:2:0的栽培模式。
|
| [22] |
李志坤, 时萍, 姜文武, 等. 不同氮肥运筹对国审弱筋小麦新品种‘皖西麦0638’产量及品质的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(3):30-34.
‘皖西麦0638’是六安市农业科学研究院选育的弱筋小麦新品种，为探究其适播区内高产栽培技术，为其大面积推广进行栽培技术指导，设置了8种氮肥运筹方式，24个小区进行试验。结果表明：采用施氮量为234 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>、基追比为7:3:3、基肥+返青肥+拔节肥的氮肥运筹方式时，‘皖西麦0638’的株高过高，倒伏面积达到了50.00%；而施氮量为288 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>、基追比为7:3:3:3、基肥+苗肥+返青肥+拔节肥的氮肥运筹方式会导致‘皖西麦0638’的倒伏比例高达81.67%，其籽粒品质也不符合弱筋小麦标准。采用施氮量180 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>、基追比为7:3、基肥+返青肥的氮肥运筹方式，可以避免出现大面积倒伏，收获较高的产量，同时可以保证‘皖西麦0638’籽粒较好的弱筋品质。
|
| [23] |
丁明亮, 刘琨, 杨忠慧, 等. 云南省小麦育种策略与思考[J]. 云南农业科技, 2023(2):4-7.
|
| [24] |
王慧, 朱冬梅, 高致富, 等. 播期与密度组合对不同小麦品种产量及抗倒性的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(6):34-39.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
樊继伟, 王康君, 张广旭, 等. 黄淮麦区不同小麦品种氮素利用差异分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(4):43-51.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
