PDF(2948 KB)
Hotspots and Prospect of Minimum Data Set (MDS) in Soil Quality Assessment Based on Bibliometric Analysis
HOUYilong, MARuiqi, LIZheng, SHIWuliang, LIBin, ZHANGShengwu, CAONing, CUIJinhu, ZHANGYubin
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 48-61.
PDF(2948 KB)
PDF(2948 KB)
Hotspots and Prospect of Minimum Data Set (MDS) in Soil Quality Assessment Based on Bibliometric Analysis
To provide scientific reference for soil quality evaluation and agricultural green development in China, this study used bibliometric methods to conduct quantitatively analysis, screened the hotspots and frontiers of soil quality evaluation based on minimum data set (MDS), and summarized the current methods and indicators used to select the MDS in soil quality research. By searching relevant literatures on CNKI and Web of Science from 1991 to 2022, we collected and screened 310 MDS. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to conduct co-occurrence analysis of the annual number of publications, countries/regions, institutions, journals, and to perform burst words and clusters analysis on keywords. Over the past 31 years, the publications in this field have gradually increased and remain in a phase of rapid development. China is the country with the largest number of publications. The journals with the largest number of publications are Acta Ecologica Sinica, Chinese Journal of Soil Science, and Ecological Indicators, respectively. The main research hotspots were the impact of agricultural management on soil quality, soil degradation and remediation, soil quality response to climate change, MDS screening methods and model construction, respectively. In the early stage, MDS in soil quality evaluation mainly used physical and chemical indicators, but with the development of soil health, the use of biological indicators has gradually increased. So the number of publications will be still in a rapid growth stage in the next period of time, and developing countries will play an important role in the globe. The core indicators are SOM/SOC, pH, TN, AP and BD, respectively. In future, research on MDS should focus on the building of soil health quality evaluation framework system, which combines static evaluation and dynamic monitoring in different scales and comprehensively reflects soil functions based on big data. The MDS and evaluation system corresponding to soil quality change under the background of climate change should be discussed, and evaluation model and optimal MDS (OMDS) should be constructed to accurately reflect soil quality change rules.
soil quality evaluation / minimum data set (MDS) / CiteSpace / cluster analysis / evaluation indicators / soil healthy
| [1] |
FAO. The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture-Systems at breaking point. Synthesis report 2021[R]. Rome, 2021.
|
| [2] |
环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R]. 北京, 2014.
|
| [3] |
中华人民共和国农业农村部. 2019年全国耕地质量等级情况公报[R]. 北京, 2020.
|
| [4] |
曹志洪, 周健民. 中国土壤质量[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
赵其国, 孙波, 张桃林. 土壤质量与持续环境Ⅰ.土壤质量的定义及评价方法[J]. 土壤, 1997(3):113-120.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
刘占锋, 傅伯杰, 刘国华, 等. 土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J]. 生态学报, 2006(3):276-288.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
张江周, 李奕赞, 李颖, 等. 土壤健康指标体系与评价方法研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(3):603-616.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
王晓飞, 魏萌萌, 温中海, 等. 物元分析法在土壤重金属污染评价中的应用[J]. 中国环境监测, 2016, 32(3):69-73.
|
| [18] |
杨先野, 付强, 王宝华, 等. 三江平原土壤质量变化评价的模糊神经网络模型构建及应用[J]. 水土保持研究, 2008(3):54-57.
|
| [19] |
刘文民, 田鹏, 刘利昆, 等. 青藏高原典型沙化区草地土壤质量评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(2):118-124.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
刘杏梅, 赵健, 徐建明. 污染农田土壤的重金属钝化技术研究——基于Web of Science数据库的计量分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(2):445-455.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
徐红星. 《中国科技期刊研究》2008—2012年核心作者群的分析研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013, 24(6):1074-1078.
对《中国科技期刊研究》2008~2012年的作者发文情况统计分析,找出核心作者群。从发文量、地区分布、机构分布等方面对核心作者群的基本情况进行了分析。并重点对核心作者群的发文被引情况多角度地进行研究。以期反映《中国科技期刊研究》的办刊水平以及作者队伍的现状。
|
| [24] |
赵玉珍. 运用布拉德福定律研究中国沙棘文献的核心期刊[J]. 情报科学, 2000(5):462-464.
|
| [25] |
胡金娇, 周青平, 吕一河, 等. 青藏高原东缘半湿润沙地典型生态恢复模式的效果比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7410-7418.
|
| [26] |
刘鸿雁, 黄建国. 缙云山森林群落次生演替中土壤理化性质的动态变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005(11):37-42.
|
| [27] |
王理德, 王方琳, 郭春秀, 等. 土壤酶学硏究进展[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(1):12-21.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
USDA-NRCS. Soil health[EB/OL]. 2025-05-13. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/natural-resource-concerns/soils/soil-health
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
张俊伶, 张江周, 申建波, 等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展:机遇与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4):783-796.
|
| [33] |
李霞, 朱万泽, 舒树淼, 等. 基于主成分分析的大渡河中游干暖河谷草地土壤质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10):3891-3900.
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
赵西宁, 刘帅, 高晓东, 等. 不同改良剂对黄土高原丘陵区山地果园土壤质量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17):7080-7091.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
全国农业区划委员会. 中国综合农业区划[J]. 农业区划, 1985(6):19.
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1634—2008,耕地地力调查与质量评价技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |