Study on Effects of Organic and Conventional Planting Modes on Quality and Economic Benefits of Rice in Yunnan

ZHANG Peng; YANG Xukun; CHEN Lu; WANG Wenzhi; MI Yanhua; LIU Zhenhuan; LI Maoxuan; SU Wen; WANG Xiangquan; YANG Yanxiong; GUO Lujun

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0048

PDF(1357 KB)

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 12-19. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0048

Study on Effects of Organic and Conventional Planting Modes on Quality and Economic Benefits of Rice in Yunnan

ZHANG Peng ¹ ,
YANG Xukun ¹ ,
CHEN Lu ¹ ,
WANG Wenzhi ¹ ,
MI Yanhua ¹ ,
LIU Zhenhuan ¹ ,
LI Maoxuan ¹ ,
SU Wen ¹ ,
WANG Xiangquan ² ,
YANG Yanxiong ³ ,
GUO Lujun ⁴

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The aims are to develop green organic agriculture, promote organic planting models, vigorously advance sustainable development strategies, explore effective organic planting models, and study the cultivation of organic and conventional rice under the rotation mode of ‘rice + broad bean + rice’. The experiment adopted adjacent planting in the field, set up duplicate and control groups, and the detection of various indicators was determined according to the corresponding national standards. Based on the experimental results, the impact of different planting modes on the quality and economic benefits of rice in Yunnan was analyzed. The results showed that the cadmium and arsenic levels in the organic planting mode were lower than those of the conventional rice, and the contents of lead, chromium, and copper were all higher than those of the conventional rice. The organic⁺ mode had higher contents of other heavy metals except for cadmium, which was lower than that of the conventional rice. Through analysis of variance, P>0.05, the differences in various safety quality indicators between different treatments were not significant; the nutritional quality of rice was higher than that of conventional planting, except for dietary fiber, which was lower than that of conventional planting. All nutritional quality indicators of the organic+ mode were higher than those of conventional planting. The overall nutritional quality of the organic planting mode was higher than that of conventional planting. Organic planting could improve the nutritional quality of rice to a certain extent, but after analysis of variance, P>0.05, the difference was not significant; Organic planting had high initial production input costs and lower yields than conventional planting. However, the market price advantage of organic rice was obvious, and the final profit was 2.5 times that of conventional planting, with good economic benefits. By comparing the two different modes of conventional planting and organic planting, this study provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for further optimizing the rice industry structure in Yunnan and improving the planting mode in some areas.

Key words

organic planting / conventional planting / Yunnan rice / quality impact / economic benefits / rice quality / sustainable development

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHANG Peng , YANG Xukun , CHEN Lu , et al . Study on Effects of Organic and Conventional Planting Modes on Quality and Economic Benefits of Rice in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(5): 12-19 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0048

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]

王敏羽, 戴志刚, 余德芳, 等. “水稻-再生稻”种植模式专用肥轻简施用对产量、肥料利用率及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5):531-542.

https://doi.org/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210808

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

【目的】研究明确“水稻-再生稻”体系施用专用肥对产量、产量构成因子、肥料利用率和经济效益的影响，为“水稻-再生稻”的轻简科学施肥提供理论依据。【方法】采用多点田间试验，设置不施肥(T1)、当地农民习惯施肥(T2)、专用肥(T3)等3个处理。分别测定不同处理的产量、产量构成因子和氮、磷、钾养分含量，从而计算养分积累量、肥料利用率和经济效益。【结果】施肥可以显著提高稻谷产量，与T1相比，9个试验点的T2处理头季稻和再生稻平均增产56.0%和89.4%;T3处理平均增产75.3%和108.9%;与T2相比，T3处理头季稻、再生稻以及两季总产量分别增加了1006 kg/hm2、356 kg/hm2和1362 kg/hm2，增幅分别为12.4%、10.3%和11.8%。T3处理相较于T2处理，每穗粒数增加了20粒，增幅达到10.5%。养分吸收结果显示，与T2处理相比，T3处理头季水稻地上部氮(N)、磷(P2O5)和钾(K2O)的积累量分别增加了7.4%、6.8%和10.2%;再生季分别增加了5.9%、16.6%和24.4%。不同试验点T3处理氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学利用率和氮肥回收利用率均有提高的趋势，与T2处理相比，最高分别增加25.3%、93.8%和143.7%。在9个试验点，纯收入平均提高了6.19×103 元/hm2。【结论】专用肥的施用可以显著提高“水稻-再生稻”种植模式稻谷产量，增加地上部养分吸收量，提高肥料利用率，减少施肥次数，提高经济效益。

[2]	纪洪亭, 周炜, 郭智, 等. 猪粪有机肥替代化学氮肥对水稻农学效应、安全效应及经济效益影响的综合评价[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(6):1451-1459. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	金淑, 席运官, 王磊, 等. 有机与常规种植稻麦品质的比较研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6):571-576. Cited in this article [2]

[4]	彭东海. 有机农业发展现状及其对农业可持续发展的促进作用[J]. 农产品加工, 2021(13):90-91+95. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	张振芳. 有机水稻标准化生产技术[J]. 现代农业研究, 2021, 27(1):113-114. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	崔莹莹, 周波, 唐劲驰, 等. 华南山地茶园有机肥高效施用模式[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(22):172-179. Cited in this article [1]

[7]

崔莹莹, 周波, 陈义勇, 等. 广东茶区土壤肥力时空变化分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1):85-95.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1176

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为了解广东省茶园土壤养分特征的变化，及时调整土壤养分管理策略，提高茶叶产量和品质。以粤东、粤西和粤北3个主要茶区为研究区域，通过对pH、有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾和中微量元素等指标的综合分析，系统评价这3个茶区土壤肥力属性在时间和空间上的变化情况。结果表明，自2009年起，经过10年的养分管理，粤东茶区土壤有机质和速效钾含量显著增加，分别达到22.87 mg/kg和123.00 mg/kg；粤西茶区土壤pH显著下降，土壤酸化程度加剧；粤北茶区土壤有机质含量从18.46 mg/kg显著增加至26.27 mg/kg。广东茶园土壤肥力状况的空间差异分析表明，粤西茶区的土壤有机质和速效钾的含量显著低于粤东和粤北茶区；仅有粤东茶区pH 4.5以上；粤北和粤东茶区Fe、Mn、Cu、Zn和Mg的含量均高于粤西茶区，部分差异达到显著水平。粤东茶区土壤养分管理趋向合理，可适当注重氮磷肥的配施。粤北茶区土壤养分管理尚可，但是部分有机肥的种类需要调整为偏碱性的肥料并需配施适量土壤调理剂，以改善土壤酸化加剧的情况，同时需要加强磷钾肥的施用。粤西茶区土壤肥力较差，并且土壤酸化加剧，应适当增施优质有机肥并需配施适量土壤调理剂，以改善土壤肥力质量。

[8]	张慧, 赵建坤, 夏兆刚, 等. 有机农业助力脱贫攻坚的模式与成效研究[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2021, 110(2):21-24. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	谭春华. 浅谈有机水稻种植模式及生态农业技术推广[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(29):65-66. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	ARUNRAT N, SEREENONCHAI S, CHAOWIWAT W, et al. Carbon, nitrogen and water footprints of organic rice and conventional rice production over 4 years of cultivation: A case study in the Lower North of Thailand[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(2): 380. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	CAVITE H J, MANKEB P, SUWANMANEEPONG S. Community enterprise consumers’ intention to purchase organic rice in Thailand: the moderating role of product traceability knowledge[J]. British food journal, 2022, 124(4): 1124-1148. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	SUSWADI, VINOLIA A S, PRASETYO A, et al. Analysis of organic rice farming contribution to farmer household income in Andong Village, Boyolali Regency[J]. IOP Conference series: Earth and environmental science, 2021, 905(1):012078. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	焦翔, 修文彦. 国际有机农业发展经验及对中国的启示[J]. 世界农业, 2021, 511(11):74-80+100. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	马晨怡, 张伟贵, 李洪艳, 等. 绿色有机稻米与常规稻米的品质相关研究[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2022, 28(8):39-42. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	陆桂清, 何松银, 衡丽, 等. 有机及常规栽培条件对不同优良食味水稻品种的产量和品质影响试验[J]. 北方水稻, 2021, 51(1):26-28. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	刘洋, 张玉烛, 柏连阳, 等. 有机、绿色与常规栽培对水稻产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2017(12):71-74. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	王蒙. 广东省典型区域水稻有机与常规栽培的对比分析研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	代福林. 银桥镇有机水稻栽培技术初探[J]. 云南农业, 2016(1):24-25. Cited in this article [1]

[19]	王紫. 云南农垦建设环洱海绿色有机水稻生产基地[N]. 农民日报, 2021-03-22(8). Cited in this article [1]

[20]	伍世惠, 李才荣, 罗贤成. 云南大关县有机水稻栽培技术[J]. 农业工程技术, 2022, 42(32):62+66. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	王锦华, 李春天. 有机产品认证发展现状与高质量发展路径探索[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2022, 116(2):20-23. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	云南省市场监督管理局. 全国有机产品认证机构名单及云南省有机产品证书及获证组织名单[EB/OL]. 2021-07-01. http://amr.yn.gov.cn/info/1030/15724.htm http://amr.yn.gov.cn/info/1030/15724.htm Cited in this article [1]

[23]	刘丽媛. 有机肥配施对稻田土壤环境质量的影响及驱动机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	韩爱民, 蔡继红, 屠锦河, 等. 水稻重金属含量与土壤质量的关系[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2002(3):27-28+32. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	金淑, 席运官, 王磊, 等. 广东省典型区域水稻有机与常规栽培的对比分析研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016. Cited in this article [1]

[26]

韩雪梅, 许俊伟, 杨秋平, 等. 施用植物源有机肥对水稻产量形成及养分吸收利用效率的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(4):798-803.

https://doi.org/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220559

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为促进稻田化肥减量,根据太湖地区有机物料资源的特征,选取本地区典型地力田块,开展植物源有机肥在稻田生产应用效应的研究。以当地常规施肥措施(有机无机复混肥追施配方肥)为对照,比较相同施氮量条件下植物源有机肥(菜籽饼与豆粕源有机肥)施用对水稻籽粒产量及其构成因子、干物质形成与积累量、养分吸收与利用效率以及土壤养分等的影响。结果表明,相较于当地常规施肥措施,植物源有机肥施用下水稻产量显著增加11.2%,结实率显著增加5.9百分点。植物源有机肥施用下水稻干物质质量较当地常规施肥措施呈明显增加的趋势,至成熟期显著增加7.5%。与当地常规施肥措施相比,植物源有机肥施用条件下的水稻吸氮总量和氮素收获指数无明显变化,但氮素籽粒生产效率显著增加6.0%;水稻吸磷总量降低4.8%,磷素籽粒生产效率和磷素收获指数显著增加8.5%和6.7百分点;水稻吸钾总量增加18.2%,钾素籽粒生产效率和收获指数降低11.3%和2.4百分点。由此可见,与当地常规施肥措施相比,稻田中植物源有机肥施用具有更好的稳产性、养分均衡性,养分利用效率较高,在中等地力及以上的稻田环境下施用植物源有机肥优势显著。

[27]	张三元, 张俊国, 金京德, 等. 有机栽培环境对水稻产量构成及稻米品质的影响[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2005(2):13-16+20. Cited in this article [1]

[28]	侯立刚, 马巍, 孙洪娇, 等. 有机栽培对水稻产量和品质影响的研究[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2012, 37(1):1-3. Cited in this article [1]

[29]	黄丽芬, 张蓉, 余俊, 等. 有机栽培对杂交粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(3):458-467. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	王祥斌. 水分管理对滴灌水稻产量和营养品质的影响机理[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2023. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	王德仁, 卢婉芳, 陈苇. 施氮对稻米蛋白质、氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001(3):353-356. Cited in this article [1]

[32]	戴湘桂, 赵一童, 宋肖肖, 等. 粒肥施用对籽粒蛋白质含量组分及米质性状的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种,1-22 [2025-05-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220829.1738.004.html http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220829.1738.004.html Cited in this article [1]

[33]	邱诗春, 周静, 卿晨, 等. 有机肥用量对水稻产量、净光合速率及土壤生物活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(22):107-113. Cited in this article [1]

[34]

邱尧, 刘备, 何霖, 等. 增施生物有机肥对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(13):1-5.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020032

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

采用田间小区试验,研究生物有机肥对水稻生长、碳氮代谢、水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响。结果表明：增施生物有机肥,能够促进水稻的生长,增加农艺性状和生物量,增强碳氮代谢能力,提高根系活力,增加水稻产量,提高耕地肥力;生物有机肥含有大量的有机质和功能微生物,能够使土壤容重降低,土壤中细菌、真菌、放线菌数量增加;土壤容重与微生物群落数量呈极显著负相关,与细菌、真菌、放线菌的相关系数分别为-0.96、-0.94、-0.97;土壤有机质含量与微生物群落数量呈显著正相关,与细菌、真菌、放线菌的相关系数分别为0.83、0.90、0.85;土壤有机质含量与水稻产量呈显著正相关,相关系数为0.85。