
Effects of Weed Control Under Different Weed Growth Patterns in Tobacco Field and Its Effects on Agronomic Traits of Tobacco
HUYong, CHENShihong, NIEZhongyang, YEZhaochun, LIUHongfeng, SONGYiyang, WANGBo
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 20-23.
Effects of Weed Control Under Different Weed Growth Patterns in Tobacco Field and Its Effects on Agronomic Traits of Tobacco
The use of grass control methods to explore ecological weed control techniques in tobacco fields is studied, with the aim of seeking new green prevention and control paths for weed control in tobacco fields. In this study, ryegrass, clover, lemongrass, peanut, horseshoe clover and other grass were selected for the experiment. Through the field plot experiment, the grass control effect of each treatment was investigated 20 and 60 days after the grass became turf, and the effects of each treatment on tobacco plant height, leaf number, leaf length and leaf width were investigated before tobacco topping. The results showed that ryegrass had the best control effect, with fast turf formation speed, over 90% control effect, and a long control time; the treatment of clover and thatch followed, while peanut and horseshoe clover were relatively poor, but they also had a certain inhibitory effect on the growth of weeds. The plant height, leaf length, and leaf width of tobacco treated with ryegrass, thatch grass, and clover grass were higher than those treated with tillage and natural grass, and there was a highly significant difference in leaf width. Ryegrass, clover, and thatch can be selected for ecological grass control in tobacco production.
tobacco / herbage / weed control effect / agronomic traits / ryegrass / green prevention and control / ecological grass control / Guizhou Province
[1] |
罗贞宝, 陆妍如, 高知灵, 等. 基于GF-1/2影像数据的烟草种植区信息遥感监测[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2022, 43(4):87-95.
|
[2] |
贵州省统计局. 贵州统计年鉴[DB/OL]. 2022-12-14. 2023-12-04. https://stjj.guizhou.gov.cn/tjsj_35719/sjcx_35720/gztjnj_40112/
|
[3] |
罗金香, 丁伟, 刘元平, 等. 重庆市烟田杂草种类、分布与危害程度研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(1):7-17.
|
[4] |
周艳华, 余清. 烟地杂草对烤烟产量产值损失研究[J]. 云南农业科技, 2007(4):25-27.
|
[5] |
谈孝凤, 张斌, 陈国奇. 茶园杂草彩色图谱[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020:1.
|
[6] |
冉海燕, 兰献敏, 陈仕红, 等. 间种白三叶草和覆盖防草布对猕猴桃园杂草的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2022, 50(2):44-49.
|
[7] |
张雯娟, 张正桂, 刘永忠, 等. 3种常见草种对桔园杂草控制能力及对柑桔根系分布的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(1):22-24.
|
[8] |
冉海燕, 叶照春, 陈仕红, 等. 广金钱草和狗牙根对芒果园杂草替代控制效果[J]. 杂草学报, 2018, 36(2):25-30.
|
[9] |
杜丽清, 吴浩, 郑良永. 果园生草栽培的生态环境效应研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(11):217-221.
果园生草是保持果园土壤肥力和改善土壤环境的有效技术,在欧美等国应用广泛。20世纪80年代初,中国引进生草技术,并首先在福建、广东等地果园中推广。但由于中国气候差异较大,缺乏规范化,果园生草技术一直没有得到广泛的推广应用。为此,笔者从生草栽培的果园环境效应、生草栽培的果树生理效应等方面综述了国内外果园生草栽培效应的研究进展,以期为果园的可持续发展、推广果园生草栽培技术提供参考。
|
[10] |
张慧, 廖敦秀, 马连杰, 等. 果园种植三叶草对杂草群落及物种多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(32):130-134.
为实现果园杂草生态控制,减少或避免使用化学除草剂。根据生态位先估和生态位竞争原理,设计间种豆科绿肥白三叶草和红三叶草两种杂草生态控制技术,同时设置清耕对照(CK),采用小样方多点取样连续两年调查果园杂草种群数量、生物量、平均株高等指标。结果表明:果园共有杂草13科28属34种;3个处理在4次调查时,对照杂草多度(Pi)高达1.001和1.000,间种白三叶草处理分别为0.755、0.664、1.001和0.945,间种红三叶草处理分别为0.986、0.889、0.982和0.992。种植白三叶处理果园在四次调查时期,杂草物种丰富度(S)和种群多样性(H)均大于对照,均匀度(J)在第一次调查时小于对照,优势集中性指数(C)均小于对照;间种红三叶草处理四次调查杂草总数量均低于对照。本研究表明间种白三叶草能改变果园杂草群落结构,有效控制杂草的生长。
|
[11] |
陈永安. 猕猴桃园种植三叶草技术及效果[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2011, 57(1):246,270.
|
[12] |
陈仕红, 叶照春, 冉海燕, 等. 幼龄茶园间作白三叶草和黑麦草替代控草效果及其对茶树的影响[J]. 杂草学报, 2021, 39(2):36-40.
|
[13] |
罗旭辉, 刘明香, 罗石海, 等. 茶园套种圆叶决明对杂草物种多样性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(12):2053-2507.
|
[14] |
何秋虹, 杨知建, 肖润林. 农田生态控草技术研究进展[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 35(S1):59-63.
|
[15] |
吴田乡, 盛婧, 朱普平, 等. 果园生草覆盖的生态效应研究进展及展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(3):28-34.
|
[16] |
毕明浩, 梁斌, 董静, 等. 果园生草对氮素表层累积及径流损失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):102-105.
|
[17] |
刘伟, 罗玲, 钟奇, 等. 生草和地布覆盖对攀枝花地区芒果园土壤性质及果实品质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2):261-270.
|
[18] |
付学琴, 陈登云, 杨星鹏, 等. ‘南丰蜜橘’园生草对土壤团聚体养分和微生物特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(11):1655-1666.
|
[19] |
陈曦, 王改玲, 刘焕焕, 等. 生草覆盖对枣园土壤水稳性团聚体中两种有机碳组成的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2):424-431.
|
[20] |
秦秦, 宋科, 孙丽娟, 等. 猕猴桃园行间生草对土壤养分的影响及有效性评价[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(1):68-76.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |