Impact of Dazomet Fumigation and Fosthiazate Hole Application on Potato Cyst Nematode Infestation and Potato Yield

FU Huijuan; YI Jun; SHAO Baolin; ZENG Shuocheng; ZHANG Haiting; LI Qiyong; ZHANG Hong; LI Xingyue

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0084

PDF(1361 KB)

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (7) : 8-14. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0084

Impact of Dazomet Fumigation and Fosthiazate Hole Application on Potato Cyst Nematode Infestation and Potato Yield

Author information +

History +

Abstract

To prevent and control the spread of potato cyst nematode, a research on field control methods for this pest was carried out. In the experiment, dazomet fumigation and fosthiazate hole application were adopted. The effects of these measures on potato production were analyzed through various indicators, such as the SPAD value and nitrogen content of the leaves, plant height, plant weight, yield at maturity, and the number of potato cyst nematodes at the pre-sowing, flowering, and maturity stages of the potatoes, and the control effect of potato cyst nematode. The results revealed that both of the treatments significantly improved the plant height and enhanced photosynthesis of leaves. At the same time, the control measures reduced the infection of potato roots by cyst nematode. The average control efficacy of dazomet fumigation for potato new cysts nematode was 91.07%, which was significantly higher than that of fosthiazate hole application and control treatment. Compared with the control, dazomet fumigation and fosthiazate hole application increased the average yield by 20.13% and 9.69%, respectively. Dazomet fumigation was notably more effective in suppressing the potato’s infection of potato cyst nematode than fosthiazate hole application, and it also substantially increased the rate of big tuber and potato yield.

Key words

potato cyst nematode / dazomet / dazomet fumigation / fosthiazate / fosthiazate hole application / control efficacy / control measures / yield

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

FU Huijuan , YI Jun , SHAO Baolin , et al . Impact of Dazomet Fumigation and Fosthiazate Hole Application on Potato Cyst Nematode Infestation and Potato Yield[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(7): 8-14 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0084

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	顾建锋, 邵宝林, 方亦午, 等. 四川省马铃薯孢囊线虫的形态和分子鉴定[J]. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37(4):520-528. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	PM 7/40 (4) Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida[J]. EPPO Bulletin, 2017, 47(2):174-197. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	彭焕, 刘慧, 江如, 等. 警惕检疫性有害生物马铃薯孢囊线虫(Globodera rostochiensis和G.pallida)入侵我国[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(6):1-9. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	张治宇, 刘爱华, 厉艳, 等. 青岛口岸截获的马铃薯白线虫[J]. 植物检疫, 2007(2):127-128. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	王达龙, 沈培垠, 汪家庆. 江苏局在运输工具检疫中首次截获马铃薯金线虫[J]. 中国检验检疫, 2000(5):37. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	JIANG R, LI Y Q, HUANG L Q, et al. Association of Globodera rostochiensis (nematoda) with stunted and chlorotic potato plants in Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces in China[J]. Plant disease, 2023,107:1027-1034. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	JIANG R, PENG H, LI Y Q, et al. First record of the golden potato nematode Globodera rostochiensis in Yunnan and Sichuan provinces of China[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 898-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63845-5 Cited in this article [1]

[8]	邓春菊, 李艳, 杨毅娟, 等. 云南省马铃薯孢囊线虫种类鉴定[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 38(3):400-408. Cited in this article [1]

[9]	宋家雄, 许翀, 陈敏, 等. 马铃薯金线虫发生特点及综合防控方法[J]. 植物检疫, 2023, 37(1):68-72. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	JATALA P, BRIDGE J. Nematode parasites of root and tuber crops[J]. Nematode parasites of root & tuber crops, 1990:237-283. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	GUY B, NATHALIE D, BENJAMIN M. Evaluation of cultural methods for the management of the golden nematode (Globodera rostochiensis) in Quebec, Canada[J]. Canadian journal of plant pathology, 2016, 38(2):209-217. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	GILREATH J P, SANTOS B M, MOTIS T N, et al. Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and cyperus control in bell pepper(Capsicum annuum)[J]. Crop protection, 2005, 24(10): 903-908. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	王晴, 李林, 朱文达, 等. 土壤熏蒸剂棉隆联合太阳能消毒防治草莓土传病害效果及经济效益分析[J]. 植物保护, 2024, 50(1):339-346. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	刘珍, 范巧兰, 姚众, 等. 生物熏蒸配施微生物菌剂对西瓜生长发育及枯萎病的影响[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(4):50-55. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	方文生, 王秋霞, 颜冬冬, 等. 土壤熏蒸剂棉隆防治土传病害研究进展及未来发展趋势[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(1):40-49. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	王芳, 姚彬, 黄成东, 等. 马铃薯养分需求及营养调控研究进展[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2023, 37(4):353-359. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	杨绅, 方文生, 白庆荣, 等. 棉隆熏蒸对烟草氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2024, 50(2):100-110. Cited in this article [1]

[18]

索海翠, 王丽, 李成晨, 等. 叶面施锌对马铃薯叶片光合特性、超微结构及产量的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(7):1963-1970.

https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.07.020

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

为明确锌对马铃薯叶片光合特性及超微结构的影响,以马铃薯品种‘粤引85-38’为试验材料,在出苗后第40 天,叶面喷施5个不同浓度ZnSO4•7H2O溶液[0（T0）、3.5 mmol/L（T1）、7.0 mmol/L（T2）、14.0 mmol/L（T3）和28.0 mmol/L（T4）]。结果显示,与缺锌处理T0相比较,较低浓度T1和T2处理显著提高了马铃薯叶片的SPAD值和净光合速率（Pn）,显著增加了地上部鲜重、地上部干重、薯块鲜重及叶片和薯块锌含量;但当处理浓度达到T4时,马铃薯叶片SPAD值和Pn显著降低,各指标分别与T0处理差异不显著,而最大荧光产量Fm,PSⅡ最大光合量子产量Fv/Fm,非光化学淬灭系数qP和化学淬灭系数NPQ则显著低于T0处理,但叶片和薯块锌含量则显著升高。进一步对叶片显微和超微结构研究显示,T2处理下马铃薯叶片栅栏组织和海绵组织排列整齐,叶绿体形态结构完好,而T0和T4处理降低了叶片表皮厚度,增加了细胞间隙。T0处理下淀粉粒增多,叶绿体膨胀短缩,基粒片层模糊不清;T4处理下细胞凹陷,叶绿体形状改变。以上结果表明,在本研究中,T1~T2处理为较为适宜马铃薯生长的锌浓度。本研究从生理上揭示了锌缺失和过量对马铃薯光合作用和生长发育的影响,为马铃薯田间叶面喷施锌肥提供一定的理论参考。

[19]	曹坳程, 张大琪, 方文生, 等. 土传病害防治技术进展及面临的挑战[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(5):260-269. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	王豪吉, 陈鹏崟, 王勇, 等. 土壤熏蒸对三七连作土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(1):51-58. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	刘博文, 李蓉, 杨萍, 等. 生物菌剂与土壤熏蒸互作对三七土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(11):2437-2450. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	曾荣, 方文生, 孙杨, 等. 二甲基二硫与氯化苦联合熏蒸防治山药土传病害效果及生物安全性评价[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(2):184-191. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	杨馥霞, 汤玲, 贺欢, 等. 不同熏蒸剂处理对土壤理化特性及草莓生长发育的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2023(11):50-55+60. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	杨馥霞, 汤玲, 贺欢, 等. 不同熏蒸剂对草莓连作土壤养分和微生物群落的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2023, 50(6):2452-2467. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	张伯虎, 朱雪荣, 孟延, 等. 不同药剂对拱棚西瓜根结线虫的防效及对土壤环境的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2022, 31(12):1646-1653. Cited in this article [1]