Study on Character Segregation of F1 Hybrids from Cymbidium ‘Gohho No Shinpi’× Cym. ‘Peace in the World’

HANJulan, XUZhenhuan, SUNTing, BAIWei, TANGXiaohua, YANGMajin

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (11) : 35-43.

PDF(2500 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2500 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (11) : 35-43. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0091

Study on Character Segregation of F1 Hybrids from Cymbidium ‘Gohho No Shinpi’× Cym. ‘Peace in the World’

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To study the hereditary law of important characters of Cymbidium and provide references for parents’ selection and new varieties breeding, the traits of crossing F1 generation from Cym. ‘Gohho No Shinpi’ with Cym. ‘Peace in the World’ were analyzed. The quantitative characters and qualitative indicators of parents and hybrid offspring were observed and statically analyzed. The results indicated that overall plant type of F1 generation tended towards the higher numerical value of the parent. The peduncle length and number of arrows showed positive heterosis advantage. The average value of inflorescence length and flowers were close to the paternal mean. The average value of flower diameter, petal length, petal width, calyx length, and calyx width were between those of the parents and closer to the paternal mean. Most of flower types were round, with petals resembling lotus petals. The flower color trait showed a relatively wide separation, forming a gradient of fusion from the maternal yellow to the paternal green, along with a small number of red and white colors. The parental petal pattern was solid, but the offspring were separated and appeared red. The flower color and petal pattern were superimposed, which were significantly different from the parents. The base color of the lip was related to the flower color, and the separation rule was the same as the flower color. The overall inheritance of lip spots was from the maternal parent, and the distribution of lip spots combined the characteristics of both parents, with 38.3% being closer to the maternal parent and 15.0% being closer to the paternal parent, while the remaining 46.7% were a fusion of both parents. All lip spot colors showed variation in depth, width, and degree of fusion. The variation coefficients of plant phenotypic traits ranged from 10.34%-18.66%, and the coefficients of flower type-related phenotypic traits ranged from 12.57%-35.62%. In conclusion, the variation of F1 generation was rich, and the heterosis of plant type and flower arrow morphology showed positive super-parent heterosis. In flower color heredity, lip spot color and distribution were based on female parent and gradually changed to male parent fusion gradient, and the flower type was between parents and tended to male parent. This research could supply reference for directed breeding of certain plant types and floral traits.

Key words

Cymbidium hybridium / hybridization / traits / F1 generation / genetic performance

Cite this article

Download Citations
HAN Julan , XU Zhenhuan , SUN Ting , et al . Study on Character Segregation of F1 Hybrids from Cymbidium ‘Gohho No Shinpi’× Cym. ‘Peace in the World’[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2024, 14(11): 35-43 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0091

References

[1]
赖鋆英, 大花蕙兰植物学形态特征及遗传多样性的SRAP分析[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2010.
[2]
陈和明, 吕复兵, 李佐, 等. 秋石斛兰F1代主要观赏性状的遗传表现[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(9):1664-1669.
[3]
黄玮婷, 曾宋君, 吴坤林, 等. 蝴蝶兰属植物杂交育种研究进展[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2012, 20(2):209-220.
[4]
李佐, 肖文芳, 陈和明, 等. 蝴蝶兰Phalaenopsis ‘Frigdaas Oxford’和Phal. SH49正反交后代观赏性状遗传倾向研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(1):4-11.
[5]
操君喜, 陈和明, 吕复兵, 等. P42×P39蝴蝶兰F1代性状分离研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2010, 39(4):10-13.
[6]
朱娇, 吕晓蕙, 王俊峰, 等. 蝴蝶兰黄色蜡质品种Phalaenopsis ‘C27’与紫红纸质品种Phalaenopsis ‘31’杂交F1代性状分离研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(1):22-27.
[7]
陈和明, 吕复兵, 朱根发, 等. 1个正反交蝴蝶兰若干性状在F1的遗传表现[J]. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(S2):28-33.
以蝴蝶兰P42和P39为亲本,配制成正反2个杂交组合,对杂交F1的植株性状、花部性状和开花期进行了统计分析。结果表明,杂种F1的株幅、叶长、叶宽、花径和花梗高度5个数量性状的平均值分别占中亲值的74.1%,65.15%,79.2%,88.5%和67.7%,均较中亲值明显下降,表现出一定程度的衰退现象,但某些性状上仍可出现超高亲个体,选育花径较大或植株更大的个体是可能的;叶数、花朵数和花色的遗传能力强,尤其是花朵数和花色,其平均变异系数分别达到30.1%和29.95%,分别占中亲值的105.0%和111.45%;在F1花色分布上,正交组合比反交组合更容易选出超亲优良个体,其F1的超亲个体占杂种数的16.8%,比反交组合高出3.1%;在亲本花色遗传能力上,颜色为紫红亲本(P39)的花色遗传能力比颜色为紫红边白的亲本(P42)更强;在花期遗传上,杂种F1的开花期趋向亲本P39,表现在抽梗期、现蕾期和始花期分别趋向于1月、3月和4月。
[8]
陈和明, 吕复兵, 肖文芳, 等. 蝴蝶兰Phalaenopsis ‘Sogo Vivien’自交S1代若干性状的遗传表现[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(2):29-35.
[9]
郑君爽, 宁惠娟, 吕慧, 等. 国兰与大花蕙兰杂交育种及无菌播种研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(4):81-84.
[10]
王丰妍, 李承秀. 大花蕙兰与春剑杂交原球茎增殖及分化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(23):327-330.
[11]
孙叶, 刘红, 李风童, 等. 春兰与大花蕙兰杂交种红花呈色机理初探[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(10):2178-2189.
为探究兰属杂交种红花的呈色机理,选择绿花春兰和黄花大花蕙兰的红花杂交种黄金梅为试验材料,通过小花蕾期和始花期花瓣的转录组测序分析,筛选影响花色的关键结构基因及调节基因,实时荧光定量PCR(qPCR)验证基因的差异表达,分光光度计法检测花瓣色素(类黄酮、叶绿素A、叶绿素B、花青苷)的含量。结果表明,通过测序共获得113 780条单基因(Unigene),其中200~300 bp的Unigene占比42.68%;44 088 个Unigene获得注释信息;与小花蕾期花瓣比较,始花期花瓣上调基因有1 855个,下调基因有2 494 个;差异表达基因(DEGs)被GO数据库注释划分为47个功能组;1 219个DEGs被KEGG数据库注释,涉及166条代谢途径;根据KEGG代谢通路及基因注释结果,筛选出与花色相关的54个关键结构基因和21个转录因子;花青苷合成基因DFR、ANS、3,5GT及转录因子Zm1、Hv1、MYB305表达量在始花期上调, 在NCBI库BLAST同源基因发现黄金梅DFR、ANS、3GT基因与大花蕙兰的基因同源性最高,5,3GT、3,5GT、Zm1基因与蝴蝶兰和石斛兰的基因同源性最高,转录因子Hv1、MYB305与建兰的基因同源性最高。qPCR参试基因表达量变化与转录组测序结果趋势一致。各阶段花瓣总黄酮的含量显著高于类胡萝卜素和叶绿素含量;始花期花瓣中花青苷含量升高。本研究结果为兰属杂交种花色基因的功能分析提供了参考。
[12]
姚婧, 覃宝祥, 刘帆, 等. 冬凤兰与‘黄金小神童’大花蕙兰杂交后代的观赏性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(7):1201-1206.
[13]
白为, 王辉, 韩菊兰, 等. AHP评价法在大花蕙兰杂交后代选育中的应用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(15):4599-4601.
[14]
许震寰, 韩菊兰, 刘静, 等. 大花蕙兰杂交种灰色关联分析与评判[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(2):226-230
[15]
韩菊兰, 白为, 李臻, 等. 大花蕙兰新品种选育-植物学特征比较分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015(35):47-50.
[16]
高雪松, 张玉萍, 顾文辉. 兰花杂交后代形态特征研究进展[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2016, 9:76-77
[17]
高兰阳, 尚迪, 许震寰, 等. 熵权赋权法灰色系统理论在大花蕙兰(Cymbidium hybridium)品种综合评价中的应用初探[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(1):176-180.
[18]
李娟娟, 陈洪伟, 王红利, 等. 一串红若干观赏性状在F1的遗传表现[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(6):113-120.
对影响一串红品质的几个性状F<sub>1</sub>中表现进行了分析,以期为一串红杂交选育提供指导。以4个自育品种红粉佳人、橙香公主、白马王子、彩铃红和一个国外品种展望紫为亲本,进行不包括正反交在内的双列杂交,配制成10个杂交组合,对F<sub>1</sub>子代植株性状、花部性状和开花期进行统计分析。结果表明,F<sub>1</sub>株高、茎粗、叶面积、花序粗、花序长、花序轮间距、花轮数、盛花期8个数量性状的平均值分别占中亲值的104.87%,126.01%,123.79%,111.09%,147.41%,134.32%,120.84%,94.51%,且有超亲个体大量出现,F<sub>1</sub>整体表现出明显的杂种优势,但不同组合杂种优势不同。杂交F<sub>1</sub>只有红色和紫红色2种花色,玫红色、橙色和白色植株未出现。各性状中,除叶面积和花轮间距外,其他性状遗传变异系数均在15%以内,变异较小。亲本选配环节最好选择花轮间距较小的品种;以矮株为F<sub>1</sub>代育种目标时,杂交亲本双方尽量都选矮株;亲本花序较短的杂交组合,其F<sub>1</sub>也会表现出强杂种优势,花序明显增长;要获得新颖花色的子代,应采用花色新颖复杂的亲本进行杂交或者做F<sub>2</sub>至多世代的选育。经过综合比较,红粉佳人&times;展望紫、彩铃红&times;红粉佳人、展望紫&times;橙香公主组合的F<sub>1</sub>表现较好。
[19]
王利民. 大花蕙兰杂交育种研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007
[20]
卢思聪, 石雷. 大花蕙兰[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004:19-20.
PDF(2500 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/