Effects of Irrigation Methods and Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Development and Yield of Winter Wheat

HANMingming, LYULianjie, LIWenqian, ZHANGHaijun

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (8) : 1-5.

PDF(1176 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1176 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (8) : 1-5. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0109

Effects of Irrigation Methods and Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Development and Yield of Winter Wheat

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of different irrigation methods and fertilizer treatments on the population dynamics, dry matter accumulation and distribution, and yield of winter wheat. A field experiment was conducted during the 2017-2018 growing season by using the winter wheat variety 'Zimai 28'. The experiment employed a split-plot design, with the main plots consisting of two irrigation methods: traditional furrow irrigation and on-demand supplementary irrigation. The subplots included two fertilizer treatments, including conventional fertilization and reduced fertilization. Growth, development indicators and yield of winter wheat were measured. The results showed that compared with the conventional fertilization treatment, the combination of on-demand supplementary irrigation and reduced fertilization significantly increased the dry matter accumulation of grains and glumes plus rachis at maturity, with increases of 11.98% and 12.47%, respectively. It also enhanced the contribution rate of post-anthesis assimilated dry matter to grain, with an increase of 10.87%, which is conducive to yield formation and ultimately improves overall economic returns. It is recommended that in regions with natural environments and production conditions similar to those of this experiment, adopting on-demand supplementary irrigation and appropriately reducing fertilization levels is an effective approach to balancing yield and economic benefits.

Key words

winter wheat / irrigation methods / fertilizer treatments / grain yield / economic benefits

Cite this article

Download Citations
HAN Mingming , LYU Lianjie , LI Wenqian , et al. Effects of Irrigation Methods and Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Development and Yield of Winter Wheat[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(8): 1-5 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0109

References

[1]
王在柱. 浅析我国水资源利用现状及农业节水灌溉对策[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2013, 4:42-43.
[2]
石祖梁, 贾涛, 王亚静, 等. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用现状及焚烧碳排放估算[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(9):32-37.
[3]
李文倩, 张海军, 韩明明, 等. 秸秆还田条件下耕作措施与施氮量对冬小麦干物质积累转运及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(34):1-8.
为探讨黄淮海地区不同秸秆处理、耕作方式和施氮量相结合的高产高效生产技术,于2018—2020年设置2年大田定位试验。试验采用裂-裂区设计,主区为秸秆处理,分别为秸秆不还田(S<sub>0</sub>)和秸秆全量还田(S<sub>1</sub>);裂区为耕作方式,分别为旋耕(R)、深耕(P)和深松(B);裂裂区为施氮量,分别为135 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>(N<sub>135</sub>)、180 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>(N<sub>180</sub>)、225 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>(N<sub>225</sub>)、270 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>(N<sub>270</sub>)。结果表明,与S<sub>0</sub>相比,S<sub>1</sub>开花期、成熟期和花后干物质积累量提高0.6%~17.5%、1.1%~17%和1.1%~18.5%,随施氮量的降低,小麦全生育时期干物质积累量降低2.8%~22.2%。相较于常规S<sub>1</sub>+R+N<sub>225</sub>模式,S<sub>1</sub>+B+N<sub>180</sub>模式开花期、成熟期干物质积累量分别增加10.3%、7.2%,干物质转运量、干物质转运率和干物质转运量对籽粒贡献率分别增加45.9%、35.6%和27.2%,因此籽粒产量提高10.1%。从产量构成因素分析,后者小麦单位面积穗数较前者显著提高10.8%,通径分析进一步证明S<sub>1</sub>+B+N<sub>180</sub>模式增产的主要原因是增加了单位面积穗数。因此,与本试验相近环境条件下,在秸秆还田基础上配合深松和氮肥适量减施是实现冬小麦高产高效生产的可行技术。
[4]
刘帅康, 林祥, 谷淑波, 等. 拔节后补灌对不同穗型冬小麦耗水和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(12):1501-1513.
[5]
CUI Y P, NING X J, QIN Y C, et al. Spatio-temporal changes in agricultural hydrothermal conditions in China from 1951 to 2010[J]. Journal of geographical sciences, 2016, 26(6):643.

Based on the daily observation data of 824 meteorological stations during 1951- 2010 released by the National Meteorological Information Center, this paper evaluated the changes in the heat and moisture conditions of crop growth. An average value of ten years was used to analyze the spatio-temporal variation in the agricultural hydrothermal conditions within a 1 km2 grid. Next, the inter-annual changing trend was simulated by regression analysis of the agricultural hydrothermal conditions. The results showed that the contour lines for temperature and accumulated temperatures (the daily mean temperature ≥0°C) increased significantly in most parts of China, and that the temperature contour lines had all moved northwards over the past 60 years. At the same time, the annual precipitation showed a decreasing trend, though more than half of the meteorological stations did not pass the significance test. However, the mean temperatures in the hottest month and the coldest month exhibited a decreasing trend from 1951 to 2010. In addition, the 0°C contour line gradually moved from the Qinling Mountains and Huaihe River Basin to the Yellow River Basin. All these changes would have a significant impact on the distribution of crops and farming systems. Although the mechanisms influencing the interactive temperature and precipitation changes on crops were complex and hard to distinguish, the fact remained that these changes would directly cause corresponding changes in crop characteristics.

[6]
张光辉, 连英立, 刘春华, 等. 华北平原水资源紧缺情势与因源[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2011, 33:172-176.
[7]
何昕楠, 林祥, 谷淑波, 等. 微喷补灌对麦田土壤物理性状及冬小麦耗水和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6):879-892.
黄淮海麦区水资源短缺, 探明畦灌和微喷补灌对麦田土壤物理性状及冬小麦耗水特性、产量和水分利用效率调节的差异, 可为该地区冬小麦节水高产栽培提供理论和技术支持。2016—2018年冬小麦生长季, 设置畦灌和微喷补灌两处理, 研究其对麦田0~40 cm土层土壤容重、总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、田间持水率, 及冬小麦各生育阶段棵间蒸发量、蒸腾量、籽粒产量和水分利用效率的影响。结果表明微喷补灌处理与畦灌处理相比, 0~20 cm土层土壤容重降低, 总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和田间持水率增加; 冬小麦返青后春季分蘖明显减少, 返青至拔节期的棵间蒸发量和蒸腾量及全生育期总耗水量均显著减少; 籽粒产量无明显变化, 但水分利用效率显著提高, 说明微喷补灌可以改善麦田土壤物理性状, 优化冬小麦群体结构, 通过减少棵间蒸发和植株无效蒸腾降低麦田耗水量, 从而在维持高产水平的同时提高水分利用效率。
[8]
刘愿英, 代世伟, 范永贵, 等. 我国灌区农业水资源可持续利用问题探讨[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007(6):157-162.
[9]
任玉忠, 王水献, 谢蕾, 等. 干旱区不同灌溉方式对枣树水分利用效率和果实品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22):95-102.
[10]
MAN J, WANG D, WHITE P. Photosynthesis and drymass production of winter wheat in response to micro-sprinkling irrigation[J]. Agronomy journal, 2017, 109(2):549-561.
[11]
LIU H, YU L, LUO Y, WANG X P, et al. Responses of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) evapotranspiration and yield to sprinkler irrigation regimes[J]. Agricultural water management, 2011, 98:483-492.
[12]
WANG J, HUANG G H, LI J S, et al. Effect of soil moisture-based furrow irrigation scheduling on melon (Cucumis melo L.) yield and quality in an arid region of northwest China[J]. Agricultural water management, 2017, 179:167-176.
[13]
王科. 低压喷灌对冬小麦节水省肥及增产效应研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2013.
[14]
居辉, 兰霞, 李建民, 等. 不同灌溉制度下冬小麦产量效应与耗水特征研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(5):23-29.
[15]
杨晓光, 陈阜, 宫飞, 等. 喷灌条件下冬小麦生理特征及生态环境特点的试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(3):35-37.
[16]
李月华, 李琴, 王树生, 等. 小麦微喷水肥一体化技术试验示范初报[J]. 河北农业科学, 2012, 16(7):28-31.
[17]
贾永国, 张双宝, 徐淑贞, 等. 滴灌条件下不同供水方式对日光温室桃树耗水量、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(2):111-114.
对滴灌条件下,不同供水方式对温室桃树耗水量、产量及水分利用效率的影响进行了系统研究,结果表明,随着灌水次数和灌水量的增加,滴灌温室桃树各物候期阶段耗水量呈增加趋势;在整个年生长周期中,各处理土壤水分消耗的变化均呈双峰曲线,需水高峰期分别出现在花芽分化期和果实发育期;在各灌水处理中,T4处理产量和水分利用效率最高,分别达41521.5 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>和54.46 kg/(mm&middot;hm<sup>2</sup>);日光温室桃树耗水量与产量、水分利用效率间均呈二次曲线关系,经相关性分析,相关系数分别为0.8949,0.9153,达0.01极显著相关水平。
[18]
李茂权, 朱帮忠, 赵飞, 等. “水肥一体化”技术试验示范与应用展望[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(7):100-101.
[19]
余松烈, 于振文, 董庆裕, 等. 小麦亩产789.9kg高产栽培技术思路[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010, 4:11-12.
[20]
于振文. 作物栽培学各论(北方本)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[21]
郭天财, 冯伟, 赵会杰, 等. 水分和氮素运筹对冬小麦生育后期光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(9):1512-1517.
[22]
蔡瑞国, 张迪, 张敏, 等. 雨养和灌溉条件下施氮量对小麦干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(2):194-202.
[23]
ABDEL-GHANI A H, AL-DALAIN S A, OWAIS S J, et al. Effect of water deficit and soil nitrogen on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and mobilization in durum wheat under semi-arid environment[J]. Jordan journal of agricultural sciences, 2013, 9(4):457-474.
[24]
文卿琳, 柳伟祥. 不同灌水和施肥处理对春小麦产量的影响[J]. 农业科学研究, 2006, 27(2):26-29.
[25]
翟丙年, 李生秀. 冬小麦水氮配合关键期和亏缺敏感期的确定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(6):1188-1195.
[26]
姚素梅, 康跃虎, 吕国华, 等. 喷灌与地面灌溉条件下冬小麦籽粒灌浆过程特性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(7):13-17.
PDF(1176 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/