Differences in Color Value and SPAD of Tobacco Leaves with Different Ripeness and Their Effects on Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves

TANGMin, HUANGJian, LUWeipeng, ZHANGHong, WANGZhushi, MAZhanfeng, YANGXikun, XIAOFei

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (8) : 69-76.

PDF(1324 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1324 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (8) : 69-76. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0110

Differences in Color Value and SPAD of Tobacco Leaves with Different Ripeness and Their Effects on Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In order to explore the differences in color value, SPAD value and quality of cured tobacco leaves with different maturity levels, the color parameters, SPAD values, conventional chemical composition and sensory quality in different sections of the tobacco leaves of three ripening levels were studied using the middle and upper tobacco leaves of ‘Yunyan 87’ as materials. The results showed that with the increase of the harvesting maturity of the middle and upper tobacco leaves, the L*, a* and b* values of tobacco leaves gradually increased, the SPAD values gradually decreased, and the uniformity of leaf color deteriorated. The color value and SPAD value of different sections of the same tobacco leaf were different, and the color value of the section near the tip of the leaf was larger and the SPAD value was smaller. The color value of the lower section (C area) of the middle tobacco leaves and the upper section (D area) of the upper tobacco leaves was similar to the overall mean value of the leaves, and the SPAD value of the upper section (D area) of the middle and upper tobacco leaves was similar to the overall mean value of the leaves. From the perspective of the quality of cured tobacco leaves, with the improvement of maturity, the quality of tobacco leaves first increased and then decreased; the middle tobacco leaves were roasted when the yellow-green area of the leaf surface was about 60% and the main vein became white about 1/2, while the upper tobacco leaves were roasted when the yellow-green area of the leaf surface was about 80% and the main vein became white about 2/3, the comprehensive quality of the cured tobacco leaves was relatively good. In addition, the color parameters L*, a* and b* of tobacco leaves were negatively correlated with SPAD values, and the color parameters and SPAD values were significantly or extremely significantly correlated with some conventional chemical composition indexes of tobacco leaves.

Key words

maturity / color values / SPAD / tobacco quality / correlation analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
TANG Min , HUANG Jian , LU Weipeng , et al . Differences in Color Value and SPAD of Tobacco Leaves with Different Ripeness and Their Effects on Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(8): 69-76 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0110

References

[1]
蔡宪杰, 王信民, 尹启生. 成熟度与烟叶质量的量化关系研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2005(4):42-46.
[2]
张军刚, 王永利, 吕国新, 等. 烤烟成熟过程中鲜烟颜色值与色素含量变化及相关分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2014, 35(1):54-60.
[3]
潘义宏, 顾毓敏, 杨森, 等. 不同品种中部烟叶SPAD值及其与叶绿素含量的相关性分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2017(2):156-162.
[4]
李旭华, 扈强, 潘义宏, 等. 不同成熟度烟叶叶绿素含量及其与SPAD值的相关分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014(3):47-52.
 为了研究叶绿素仪在判断烟叶成熟度中的应用,对不同部位不同成熟度烟叶叶绿素含量和SPAD值进行测定和相关性分析。结果表明,从适熟、成熟至过熟,各部位烟叶叶绿素a、叶绿素b、总叶绿素含量以及SPAD值显著降低。下部适熟、中部成熟、上部成熟采收烟叶的总叶绿素含量和SPAD值相关系数分别为0.777、0.942、0.877,均达极显著正相关。下部和中部3个成熟度烟叶总叶绿素含量与SPAD值均是在叶基部位达到显著正相关,上部适熟和过熟烟叶在叶基部达到显著正相关,成熟烟叶在叶中或叶基部位达到极显著正相关。综合分析表明,上、中、下3个部位不同成熟度烟叶叶基部为叶绿素仪测定的最佳部位,适熟、成熟、过熟,下部叶叶基部叶绿素仪的读数分别为22.8~32.1、19.7~22.8、13.5~17.2,中部叶读数分别为24.1~28.5、19.2~21.4、2.4~4.3,上部叶读数分别为36.2~47.5、18.3~23.1、2.2~3.8;使用叶绿素仪能较好地判断下部适熟或过熟档次烟叶,并能较好地判断上部和中部3个采收成熟档次的烟叶,其中对成熟烟叶的判断效果最好。 
[5]
徐光辉, 虎晓红, 熊淑萍, 等. 烤烟叶片叶绿素含量与颜色特征的关系[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2007(6):600-604.
[6]
陈乾锦, 池国胜, 袁帅, 等. 鲜烟不同采收成熟度和SPAD值与烤后烟叶质量关系研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021(1):55-59.
[7]
刘芳, 宋笑龙, 马浩波, 等. 不同成熟度烤烟萜类物质含量及相关基因研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2023(4):79-86.
[8]
武钰存, 李波, 许佳丹, 等. 不同采收成熟度对南平上部烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023(7):1802-1805.
对上部叶采收成熟度把握不准,会导致上部4~6片烟叶一次性采收技术推广效果不理想,为此,我们研究云烟87上部4~6片烟叶的适宜采收成熟度,确定最有利于可用性提升的采收成熟度,为南平优质烤烟生产提供技术支撑。本文采用随机区组设计,设置3个处理,即T1处理,叶片8成黄采收;T2处理,叶片9成黄采收;T3处理,叶片全黄采收。各处理3次重复。结果表明,随着采收成熟度的提高,上部烟叶面积逐渐增大;上部烟叶9成黄采收烤后的外观质量和感官质量最好,还原糖含量较高,烟碱和钾含量适宜,协调性指标最高,产量低于8成黄采收处理,而其他经济性状指标均最高;T2处理的产值分别比T1和T3处理提高了9.50%和19.45%,提高了烟叶等级结构,提升了均价,综合经济性状好。总体而言,采收成熟度为9成黄的烟叶不仅烟碱含量适中,化学成分协调,外观质量和感官质量最高,且经济效益最好,最有利于高可用性提升的成熟度标准,建议在南平烟区采取上部烟叶9成黄时一次性采收。
[9]
贾中林, 尹启生, 陈广晴, 等. 成熟度对烤烟上部烟叶生理特性及烟叶质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(4):1-7.
[10]
倪克平, 甄焕菊, 姬小明, 等. 不同采烤成熟度对云烟87上部叶烘烤质量的影响[J]. 福建农业科技, 2023, 54(2):55-60.
[11]
李齐霖, 金江华, 李旭, 等. 采收成熟度对稻茬烤烟上部6片烟叶质量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(1):41-48.
[12]
吴飞跃, 游连尉, 郭学清, 等. 采收成熟度对‘翠碧一号’上部烟叶质量的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(2):45-47.
[13]
刘舜旗, 柳强, 潘洪, 等. 基于鲜叶外观参数的烤后烟叶柔软度LM-BP神经网络预测模型构建[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2024(2):152-159.
[14]
匡鹏飞. 成熟度对烘烤过程烟叶颜色、生化变化及烤后质量的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023.
[15]
李雨芮, 李佛琳, 贾博文, 等. 云南省主栽烤烟品种C3F烟叶色度值比较分析[J]. 作物研究, 2022(6):568-574.
[16]
王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:24-29,36-37.
[17]
李向阳, 刘国顺, 史舟, 等. 利用室内光谱红边参数估测烤烟叶片成熟度[J]. 遥感学报, 2007, 11(2):269-275.
[18]
李青山, 张玉琴, 沈晗, 等. 基于叶绿素相对含量的烤烟叶色仿真[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(3):110-117.
[19]
霍开玲, 宋朝鹏, 武圣江, 等. 不同成熟度烟叶烘烤中颜色值和色素含量的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(10):2013-2021.
【目的】了解不同成熟度烟叶密集烘烤中颜色值和色素含量的变化以及它们之间的关系,为密集烘烤工艺的优化和完善提供理论依据。【方法】采用全自动测色色差计,对比研究烘烤中未熟、尚熟、适熟和过熟烟叶颜色参数(L*、a*、b*)和色差参数(△L*、△a*、△b*)的变化特征,采用分光光度法测定不同成熟度烟叶叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量等指标。【结果】不同成熟度烟叶的L*、a*值在烘烤过程中均呈现升高的趋势,b*值在48℃之前升高,48&mdash;54℃有所下降,之后稍有回升。L*的变化规律表现为过熟>适熟>尚熟>未熟,鲜烟叶a*值在不同成熟度之间差别不大,在变黄中期之前成熟度高的烟叶a*值上升较快,烤后烟叶b*值大小表现为尚熟>未熟>过熟>适熟。随着烘烤的进行,烟叶△L*总体趋势变小。在48℃烟叶△a*明显变大,△b*相对降低,尤其以未熟和过熟烟叶明显。相关分析表明,尚熟和适熟烟叶的类胡萝卜素含量与L*值均呈极显著负相关(r = - 0.979,-0.851,P < 0.01),类胡萝卜素含量与a*值呈显著负相关(r = - 0.832,- 0.853,P < 0.05)。烘烤过程中适熟烟叶的L*、a*和b*与各种色素含量的回归方程分别为 = 245.67 x1 + 114.75 x2 - 211.69 x3 - 125.21 x4 + 118.69, = 416.9 x1 + 369.19 x2 - 404.38 x3 -78.38 x4 + 43.55,&nbsp; = - 1051.55 x1 -1270.02 x2 + 1106.42 x3 + 17.48 x4 + 40.1。【结论】烘烤中不同成熟度烟叶正反面颜色变化趋势基本同步,烟叶颜色参数和色素含量的相关性明显,可以用颜色值作为辅助指标来判断烟叶成熟度。
[20]
郑璞帆. 陕南地区不同成熟度烟叶生理特性和烤后品质研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[21]
李青山, 矫海楠, 王传义, 等. 烟叶正背面颜色参数与色素和主要化学成分的关系研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(8):332-336.
[22]
曾建敏, 姚恒, 李天福, 等. 烤烟叶片叶绿素含量的测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J]. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(1):56-62.
[23]
孙阳阳, 靳志伟, 黄明迪, 等. SPAD值与鲜烟叶成熟度及烤后烟叶质量的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(2):42-46.
[24]
梁洪波, 李念胜, 元建, 等. 烤烟烟叶颜色与内在品质的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2002(1):9-11.
[25]
彭新辉, 易建华, 周清明, 等. 同部位不同等级烤烟的色泽和化学成分及其关系[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(1):39-43.
[26]
丁根胜, 张庆明, 巴金莎, 等. 烟叶颜色色度学指标与烤烟品质的关系分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(4):14-18.
[27]
刘新民. 颜色量化分析在烤烟品质评价中的应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2004.
PDF(1324 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/