Effects of Different Slow (Controlled) Release Fertilizers on Reduction and Efficiency of Rice Chemical Fertilizers and Soil Environment

XIE Wei; YUAN Hangjie; YANG Wenye

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0131

PDF(1222 KB)

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (11) : 23-27. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0131

Effects of Different Slow (Controlled) Release Fertilizers on Reduction and Efficiency of Rice Chemical Fertilizers and Soil Environment

Author information +

History +

Abstract

To explore the efficiency of different slow (controlled) release fertilizers in rice, this experiment set up four treatments of fertilization: conventional fertilization, Maoshi controlled-release fertilizer, Sirte slow-release fertilizer, and Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer. The rice yield and soil chemical properties were measured in each plot, and the effects of different slow (controlled) release fertilizers on reduction and efficiency of rice fertilizer, soil fertility and determination of soil chemical properties were evaluated using combination of the analysis of soil enzyme activity and microorganism indicators. The results showed that when fertilizer nutrients quantity decreased by 13%, the theoretical yield of rice was consistent with the actual yield, with Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer treatment>Sirte slow-release fertilizer treatment>conventional fertilization treatment>Maoshi controlled-release fertilizer treatment; under the application of slow (controlled) release fertilizer in rice, the cost-saving and fertilizer reduction effect of Sirte slow-release fertilizer and Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer were the better; the total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium content of rice grains and straw treated with Sirte slow-release fertilizer and Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer were relatively higher. Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer treatment had the best effect on improving various chemical and biological characteristics of soil. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that the application of Maoshi dual control slow-release fertilizer had the best effect.

Key words

slow (controlled) release fertilizers / fertilizer reduction and efficiency / soil / rice yields

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

XIE Wei , YUAN Hangjie , YANG Wenye. Effects of Different Slow (Controlled) Release Fertilizers on Reduction and Efficiency of Rice Chemical Fertilizers and Soil Environment[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(11): 23-27 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0131

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	卢再杰, 谈梅芳, 余策金, 等. 缓控肥在水稻生产上应用探讨[J]. 农业与技术, 2017, 37(22):66. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	吴红洪, 徐广辉, 高凤云, 等. 缓控释肥对水稻产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(7):116-118. Cited in this article [1]

[3]	陈和秀, 郑铭洁, 赵玲玲, 等. 缓释肥对水稻生物性状、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2019, 30(11):48-49. Cited in this article [1]

[4]	KHAN M A, KIM K W, WANG M, et al. Nutrient-impregnated charcoal: an environmentally friendly slow-release fertilizer[J]. Environmentalist, 2008, 28(3):231-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9133-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-007-9133-5 Cited in this article [1]

[5]	张玉凤, 沈玉文, 王江涛, 等. 缓控释掺混尿素对章丘大葱-小麦产量、效益及土壤氮素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):231-238. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	DONG D, WANG C, ZWIETEN L V, et al. An effective biochar-based slow-release fertilizer for reducing nitrogen loss in paddy fields[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2020, 20(8):3027-3040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02401-8 Cited in this article [1]

[7]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	农业部果品及苗木质量监督检验测试中心（郑州）、中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所. NYT2017-2011,植物中氮、磷、钾的测定[S].2011. Cited in this article [1]

[9]

楼玲, 袁杭杰, 李丹, 等. 不同缓(控)释肥对水稻化肥减量增效和土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(20):73-77.

https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0673

Cited in this article [1] Abstract

本研究旨在评估不同缓（控）释肥在水稻栽培中的化肥减量增效效果及对土壤肥力和酶活性的影响。通过设立4个不同的施肥处理：常规施肥、有机缓释肥、掺混肥料和永笑缓释肥，对各小区水稻产量及土壤化学性质测定，并结合土壤酶活性等指标进行了综合分析。经过2年的连续试验，结果显示，在养分投入减少15%的条件下，施用缓（控）释肥能够实现成本节约和效率提升，其中以永笑缓释肥的效果最为显著。水稻籽粒中的氮、磷、钾含量与各处理中相应肥料的投入量呈正相关。4种处理实施后，土壤有机质和碱解氮含量均有所增加，且3种缓（控）释肥处理的增加幅度超过了常规施肥处理。然而，土壤有效磷和速效钾的含量有所下降。值得注意的是，与常规施肥相比，施用缓（控）释肥后的土壤脲酶、蛋白酶、磷酸酶和脱氢酶活性均有明显提高，这表明缓（控）释肥的使用有助于提升土壤酶活性，从而改善土壤的生物学特性。

[10]	王惠英. 水稻控缓释配方肥肥效对比试验初报[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(9):54-55. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	李新悦, 王昌全, 李冰, 等. 控释掺混氮肥对稻麦土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(1):35-42. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	蒋晓梅, 彭福田, 张江红, 等. 肥料袋控缓释对桃树土壤酶活性及植株生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015(2):279-284. Cited in this article [1]