Two New Varieties of High-quality Soft Rice: Field Experiment on Disease Resistance and High Yield

YANGRongjiao, WANGBai, WANGBaichang, ZHANGBisheng, LIXuemei, XIAZaixing, YUXuanli, CHENYixiang

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (12) : 8-14.

PDF(1250 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1250 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (12) : 8-14. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0165

Two New Varieties of High-quality Soft Rice: Field Experiment on Disease Resistance and High Yield

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this study, with 'Hongyou 7' as the control, the field agronomic traits, disease-resistance performance, yield traits and rice quality of the new varieties 'Dedao 1' and 'Dedao 3' were compared to provide a scientific basis for the popularization and application of soft rice varieties in Yunnan. The results showed that the growth period of 'Dedao 1' (151 days) was the longest, followed by that of 'Hongyou 7' (145 days), and the growth period of 'Dedao 3' (136 days) was the shortest. There was no significant difference in plant height among the three varieties, and the occurrence of field diseases was generally mild. Among them, the disease indices of panicle neck blast, bacterial blight and sheath blight of 'Dedao 1' and 'Dedao 3' were significantly lower than those of 'Hongyou 7'. The panicle length, total number of grains per panicle, number of filled grains per panicle, seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight of 'Dedao 1' and 'Dedao 3' were higher than those of 'Hongyou 7', and their average yields were 15.54% and 6.89% higher than that of 'Hongyou 7' respectively. The cooking quality of 'Dedao 1' and 'Dedao 3' was better than that of 'Hongyou 7'. Compared with 'Hongyou 7', the new varieties 'Dedao 1' and 'Dedao 3' have outstanding comprehensive performance and good adaptability, and can be further demonstrated, popularized and planted in the soft-rice production areas of Yunnan.

Key words

rice / high-quality soft rice / agronomic trait / disease resistance / high yield / adaptability / Yunnan

Cite this article

Download Citations
YANG Rongjiao , WANG Bai , WANG Baichang , et al . Two New Varieties of High-quality Soft Rice: Field Experiment on Disease Resistance and High Yield[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2025, 15(12): 8-14 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0165

References

[1]
王跃星, 魏祥进, 徐春春, 等. 我国水稻种业发展现状与对策浅析[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5):62-65.
种业是我国农业发展的重要基石,水稻种源自主可控是保障国家粮食安全的根本基础。我国水稻传统育种技术创新力强,知识产权保护体系较为完善,但新兴育种技术仍存在发展空间。因此,未来我国仍需加大财政支持力度,提高种业核心技术研发能力等,不断提高水稻种业科技创新能力。
[2]
隋亚云, 王志兴, 郭素华, 等. 水稻新品种推广的现状、问题与建议[J]. 北方水稻, 2020, 50(3):57-60.
[3]
李自超, 张洪亮, 曾亚文, 等. 云南稻种资源表型遗传多样性的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2001(6):832-837.
[4]
郑国利, 杜明, 李家瑞, 等. 云南软米的发展及其在水稻育种中的应用[J]. 中国种业, 2023(3):28-32.
[5]
李存龙, 杨芬, 罗龙, 等. 云南香型软米水稻资源及在水稻育种中的研究利用[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008(5):1450-1455.
[6]
曾亚文, 申时全, 杨忠义, 等. 云南稻种资源的蒸煮食味品质研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 2001(5):410-413.
[7]
陈智慧, 王芳权, 许扬, 等. 软米基因Wx-mp在部分粳稻品种资源中的分布[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(4):975-981.
携带Wx-mp基因的水稻材料直链淀粉含量约为10%,其米饭柔软,富有弹性,深受市场欢迎。为探明该基因在水稻品种资源中的分布情况以及加快该基因利用进程,我们开发了该基因的功能标记,对我国南方242份粳稻品种资源进行了检测,发现26份品种资源携带Wx-mp基因,其中25份来源于江苏品种和育种中间材料,1份来源于上海;为验证标记检测的准确性,对26份材料进行了重测序,测序结果与标记检测结果完全吻合;对26份材料的直链淀粉含量进行测定,直链淀粉平均含量为9.2%,变异幅度3.3%,直链淀粉含量最低的品种为南粳505,含量为7.3%,直链淀粉含量最高的品种是南粳46,含量为10.6%,以上结果表明,软米基因Wx-mp主要分布在江沪一带。
[8]
曾波, 李爱宏, 吕海霞. 近年来中国水稻品种审定和推广应用的几个特点[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(21):4035-4039,4055.
[9]
于洋, 陈建云, 张江丽, 等. 不同类型籼稻区对杂交籼稻性状的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(1):39-47.
[10]
李仕贵, 马玉清, 何平, 等. 不同环境条件下水稻生育期和株高的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2002(4):546-550.
[11]
郎有忠, 窦永秀, 王美娥, 等. 水稻生育期对籽粒产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(3):528-534.
[12]
何平, 杨阳, 陈俊丞, 等. 水稻多基因型种群品种在云南不同稻区的抗病丰产性评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(4):745-754.
[13]
张能, 张露元, 李晓方, 等. 水稻多基因型种群品种不同生态稻区的适应性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(8):1-8.
旨在探究水稻多基因型种群品种在不同生态稻区的适应性和稳定性,为多基因型种群品种的推广提供依据。选用参试品种‘尤群6号’、‘南八糯’和对照品种‘红优7号’开展田间试验,通过抗病性、农艺性状等指标进行综合评价。结果表明:参试品种‘尤群6号’(0.40~0.95 kg/m2)和‘南八糯’(0.81~1.04 kg/m2)在4个稻区产量显著高于对照品种(尤群6号在文山地区表现除外);田间发病总体较轻,个别品种在局部试验点表现有差异,‘尤群6号’在文山稻瘟病发生 (DI=48.66)和粳稻区楚雄稻曲病发生相对较重,仍需继续种植综合观察;品种生育期随试验点海拔的升高而缩短,株高随月平均气温升高而增高,品种内株高变异系数介于1.97~6.13之间。研究表明参试品种在籼粳混栽区红河表现最佳,籼稻区德宏表现较好,在文山、楚雄田间表现有待继续评价;总体上,表现出较好适应性和稳定性。
[14]
李全衡, 陈洁, 郑智, 等. 云南省水稻品种科研育种及应用[J]. 中国种业, 2021(12):27-30.
[15]
窦海珊, 管俊娇, 李小林, 等. 云南省2008-2023年审定水稻品种品质及相关性状分析[J]. 中国种业, 2024(5):62-72.
[16]
董维, 张建平, 邓伟, 等. 云南省1983—2021年审定水稻品种基本特性分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4):84-89.
水稻是云南最主要的粮食作物之一。对已审定水稻品种进行总结和分析,可为云南未来的水稻新品种选育工作提供参考。本研究对云南省1983—2021年审定的559个水稻品种的亲本、产量、米质和抗病性等主要性状进行了分析评价。结果表明,审定的品种数量呈逐年上升趋势;杂交稻与常规稻的亲本多样性基本相当,亲本多样性并未随着审定品种数量上升而增加;杂交稻(非旱稻)和常规稻(非旱稻)单产呈小幅上下波动态势,旱稻单产呈增长趋势;近12年(2010—2021年)品种优质率为35.71%,优质1级品种数量极少,垩白度是影响米质提升最主要的因素;总体上,稻瘟病抗性有所降低,白叶枯抗性优于稻瘟病,近4年数据,抗纹枯病性好,感及高感纹枯病品种占比在15.00%以下,感及高感稻曲病品种占比在17.00%~52.00%间波动。
[17]
陈建云. 云南不同类型籼稻区对籼稻组合影响的分析[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2017.
[18]
顾雪, 高亮, 杨米, 等. 云南软香型籼稻品种滇屯502的复壮研究[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(4):698-705.
软香型品种滇屯502是云南特色优质米生产的当家品种,30余年生产应用种性退化严重,在无病虫害防治条件下,其稻瘟病发病率为100%,产量减少41.9%。为了对该品种进行复壮,采用单穗选择、株系比较、品系鉴定的方法,紧扣稻瘟病抗性、香味和软米几个重要而典型的性状,开展滇屯502复壮相关研究。结果表明,在2.67万株滇屯502群体中筛选出3个复壮品系,入选率为0.01%。这3个品系表型和食味品质与滇屯502相似,但产量和稻瘟病抗性较滇屯502分别至少提高41.1%和58.3%。利用复壮品系混系繁殖形成的复壮滇屯502,较原种滇屯502的生产力得到明显提高。本研究结果可为云南软香常规稻品种复壮提供技术和经验指导。
[19]
张能, 张露元, 范金娇, 等. 水稻多基因型种群品种田间抗病丰产试验[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(6):1003-1008.
[20]
TUCKER S L, BESI M I, GALHANO R, et al. Common genetic pathways regulate organ-specific infection-related development in the rice blast fungus[J]. The plant cell, 2010, 22(3):953-972.
Magnaporthe oryzae is the most important fungal pathogen of rice (Oryza sativa). Under laboratory conditions, it is able to colonize both aerial and underground plant organs using different mechanisms. Here, we characterize an infection-related development in M. oryzae produced on hydrophilic polystyrene (PHIL-PS) and on roots. We show that fungal spores develop preinvasive hyphae (pre-IH) from hyphopodia (root penetration structures) or germ tubes and that pre-IH also enter root cells. Changes in fungal cell wall structure accompanying pre-IH are seen on both artificial and root surfaces. Using characterized mutants, we show that the PMK1 (for pathogenicity mitogen-activated protein kinase 1) pathway is required for pre-IH development. Twenty mutants with altered pre-IH differentiation on PHIL-PS identified from an insertional library of 2885 M. oryzae T-DNA transformants were found to be defective in pathogenicity. The phenotypic analysis of these mutants revealed that appressorium, hyphopodium, and pre-IH formation are genetically linked fungal developmental processes. We further characterized one of these mutants, M1373, which lacked the M. oryzae ortholog of exportin-5/Msn5p (EXP5). Mutants lacking EXP5 were much less virulent on roots, suggesting an important involvement of proteins and/or RNAs transported by EXP5 during M. oryzae root infection.
[21]
刘树芳, 张先闻, 董丽英, 等. 云南不同稻区稻瘟病菌群体遗传结构的SSR分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(12):123-130.
为了解稻瘟病菌的群体遗传结构,选用13对SSR标记对2007—2013年分离自云南省陆稻区、籼稻区和粳稻区(共计13个州)的125个稻瘟病菌单孢菌株的全基因组DNA进行PCR扩增及分析,结果13对引物共检测出128个等位基因;聚类分析表明,在相似系数为0.57时,125个供试菌株可划分为29个遗传宗谱,优势宗谱YN02包含了39个菌株,占总菌株数的31.20%,次优势宗谱YN08包含了15个菌株,占总菌株数的12.00%,其余71个菌株分属27个宗谱;表明云南省既有优势宗谱,又有较多遗传多样性的小宗谱,菌株群体遗传多样性丰富;比较不同稻区菌株群体的宗谱频率发现,陆稻区菌株的宗谱频率为65.52%,粳稻区和籼稻区菌株的宗谱频率分别为27.59%和13.79%,表明陆稻区菌株群体的遗传结构比粳稻区、籼稻区菌株复杂。因此,针对菌株群体宗谱较少,且优势宗谱突出的地方,应加强品种多样化种植,有利于稻瘟病菌群体的稳定化选择,降低病害流行风险。
[22]
杨楠, 陈恺茜, 杨勤忠, 等. 云南地方籼粳稻稻瘟病抗性和农艺性状差异分析及优异稻种筛选[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(10):2680-2689.
[23]
LI W, CHERN M, YIN J, et al. Recent advances in broad-spectrum resistance to the rice blast disease[J]. Current opinion in plant biology, 2019, 50:114-120.
Blast is arguably the most devastating fungal disease of rice. Systematic studies of this disease have made significant progress and identified many genes. Broad-spectrum resistance is highly preferred in agricultural practice. Here, we focus our discussion on resistance (R) and defense-regulator (DR) genes that confer broad-spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae, in particular those potentially causing no significant yield penalties. Recent advances show that broad-spectrum resistance can be achieved without significant yield penalties, or even with yield benefits. Cross talks of defense signaling mediated by these genes are present that may allow the host to integrate different anti-fungal factors against M. oryzae infection. We also summarize possible mechanisms underlying broad-spectrum resistance to rice blast.Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
[24]
BAGNARESI P, BISELLI C, ORRÙ L, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling of the early response to Magnaporthe oryzae in durable resistant vs susceptible rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes[J]. Plos one, 2012, 7(12):e51609.
[25]
张锦文. 杂交籼稻在云南不同海拔和纬度的产量及品质变化研究[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2016.
[26]
杜永林. 江苏省水稻品种选育利用现状与发展对策[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2010(1):9-13.
[27]
罗龙, 陶永宏, 韦永贵, 等. 云南香型软米水稻资源农艺性状遗传效应研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(6):992-996,1004.
[28]
李学梅, 李翱, 陈以相, 等. 云南德宏杂交籼稻品种农艺性状与产量的相关性[J]. 热带生物学报, 2021, 12(4):456-465.
[29]
姜心禄, 李旭毅, 池忠志, 等. 10个品种的生态适应性与产量稳定性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(12):2792-2795.
[30]
李树杏, 涂敏, 黄贵民, 等. 贵州省水稻区试稳产性与适应性分析[J]. 种子, 2011, 30(6):83-85.
[31]
卢林, 孙成效, 朱智伟, 等. 我国稻米品质标准及检测技术创新概述[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(1):1-6.
稻米品质是决定其市场价值和商品价值的重要属性。本文简述了我国稻米品质标准的现状;探讨了稻米品质评价包括的五个方面:加工品质、外观品质、蒸煮品质、食味品质及营养品质;介绍了稻米品质检测技术的创新进展。
[32]
陈燕红, 胡标林, 张帆涛. 稻米品质遗传分析研究现状[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(1):44-54,59.
水稻是我国主要的粮食作物之一,近65%的人口以稻米为主食。随着人们生活水平不断提高,对稻米品质的要求日趋提升,改善稻米品质尤为迫切。因此,优质水稻品种选育成为水稻育种研究的重要课题。本文对稻米外观品质、加工品质、蒸煮食味品质和营养品质等性状的QTL定位、克隆和功能研究进行了概述,以期为稻米品质改良育种提供参考依据。
[33]
李清华, 朱业宝, 郑长林, 等. 福建水稻地方品种稻米品质鉴定与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(5):1291-1301.
[34]
夏朵, 周浩, 何予卿. 稻米品质的遗传研究及分子育种进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1):48-61.
[35]
LI X, WU L, GENG X, et al. Deciphering the environmental impacts on rice quality for different rice cultivated areas[J]. Rice, 2018, 11(1):1-10.
[36]
杨陶陶, 韦佳, 邹积祥, 等. 早晚兼用型水稻稻米品质在早、晚季的差异特征[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(9):1843-1851.
为明确华南地区早晚兼用型水稻稻米品质在早、晚季的差异特征,以6个早晚兼用型水稻品种(美香占2号、象牙香占、19香、南晶香占、二广香占3号、莉香占)为试验材料,测定了大田栽培条件下早、晚季稻米的加工、外观、蒸煮和食味品质等指标。结果表明,与早季相比,晚季稻米糙米率、精米率、垩白粒率、垩白度和蛋白质含量平均降低4.8、2.5、2.4、0.7和0.8个百分点,整精米率和直链淀粉含量平均提高5.6和0.9个百分点。早晚兼用型水稻加工和外观品质、直链淀粉和蛋白质含量在早、晚季的差异与其灌浆期的温度相关。与早季相比,晚季稻米峰值黏度、崩解值和糊化温度分别平均降低10.7%、19.5%和1.60 ℃,消减值平均升高32.4%。另外,晚季米饭硬度、黏性、咀嚼性和食味值均整体显著高于早季,平均增幅分别为36.7%、37.1%、37.5%和10.3%。早晚兼用型水稻糊化特性、米饭质构和食味值在早、晚季的差异与直链淀粉和蛋白质含量相关。综上,早晚兼用型水稻在早、晚季种植时的加工和外观品质、稻米糊化特性、米饭质构和食味值存在较大差异,主要与灌浆期温度和稻米组分变化有关。本研究结果可为华南双季稻,特别是“丝苗米”的品种选育、优质栽培及产品加工提供理论依据。
[37]
邹茜, 邵源梅, 黄平, 等. 不同生态型低AC稻米蒸煮和食味品质特性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(11):2514-2520.
[38]
LI C, LUO J, ZHANG C, et al. Causal relations among starch chain-length distributions, short-term retrogradation and cooked rice texture[J]. Food hydrocolloids, 2020, 108:106064.
[39]
吉志军, 尤娟, 王龙俊, 等. 不同基因型水稻稻米加工品质和外观品质的生态型差异[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2005(4):16-20.
[40]
邵雅芳, 郑欣, 朱大伟, 等. 2002—2022年中国籼稻品质的时空分布和发展状况[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(3):418-430.
PDF(1250 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/