PDF(5978 KB)
Analysis of Potential Pests Risk in Actinidia chinensis Seedlings Introduced from Japan
YIJun, ZHANGYu, FUHuijuan, HURongping, XUBingzhi, ZENGShuocheng, ZHANGHaiting, LIQiyong, ZHANGHong, LIXingyue
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 59-68.
PDF(5978 KB)
PDF(5978 KB)
Analysis of Potential Pests Risk in Actinidia chinensis Seedlings Introduced from Japan
To clarify the pests that may be carried by Actinidia chinensis seedlings and their invasion risks, and to provide a reference for the introduction of A. chinensis seedlings from Japan, the pest information regarding A. chinensiswas searched through the national biosafety basic data information resource platform. The regional distribution of key quarantine pests in the world was clarified through the databases of EPPO, CABI and GBIF, and the risk of invasion was analyzed by the previous relevant studies. The results showed that the pests on A. chinensis plants included 18 species of insects, 4 species of nematodes, 1 species of mite, 1 species of weed, 1 species of mollusk, 24 species of fungi, and 5 species of bacteria. Among these, 5 species belonged to the Chinese imported phytosanitary pests, namely, Lobesia botrana, Involvulus cupreus, Radopholus similis, Euglandina rosea, and Verticillium albo-atrum, with hazardous R-values of 2.14, 2.46, 2.70, 2.51 and 2.52, respectively, belonging to the highly or particularly hazardous pests. To ensure a successful introduction of plant seedlings, it is crucial to collaborate with both internal and external inspection teams to quarantine any potential pests. Adhering to strict quarantine standards and the transmission of pests must be prevented. Once the seedlings are introduced, it's essential to enhance trial planting supervision and improve the pest monitoring system.
Actinidia chinensis / Japan / seedlings introduction / biological invasion / quarantine / risk assessment
| [1] |
徐小彪, 张秋明. 中国猕猴桃种质资源的研究与利用[J]. 植物学报, 2003, 20(6):648-655.
|
| [2] |
王连润, 陶磅, 陈霞, 等. 野生猕猴桃优异资源果实形态及营养成分分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(7):1515-1520.
|
| [3] |
Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) is one of the popular fruits worldwide, and its quality is mainly determined by key metabolites (sugars, flavonoids and vitamins). Previous works on kiwifruit are mostly done via a single omics approach or involve only limited metabolites. Consequently, the dynamic metabolomes during kiwifruit development and ripening and the underlying regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, using high-resolution metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses, we investigated kiwifruit metabolic landscapes at 11 different developmental and ripening stages and revealed a parallel classification of 515 metabolites and their co-expressed genes into 10 distinct metabolic vs gene modules (MM vs GM). Through integrative bioinformatics coupled with functional genomic assays, we constructed a global map and uncovered essential transcriptomic and transcriptional regulatory networks for all major metabolic changes that occurred throughout the kiwifruit growth cycle. Apart from known MM vs GM for metabolites such as soluble sugars, we identified novel transcription factors that regulate the accumulation of procyanidins, vitamin C and other important metabolites. Our findings thus shed light on the kiwifruit metabolic regulatory network and provide a valuable resource for the designed improvement of kiwifruit quality.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
|
| [4] |
杨勤民, 朱国亮. 国外引种新特点及检疫风险点分析研究[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(4):161-165.
|
| [5] |
高增永, 赵艳业, 刘树勋. 实施新《种子法》后引种的潜在风险与应对措施[J]. 中国种业, 2016, 35(5):17-18.
|
| [6] |
杨勤民, 卢增全, 张德满, 等. 国外引种风险评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2011, 31(3):41-43.
|
| [7] |
张杰, 敖子强, 吴永明, 等. 中华猕猴桃(Actinidia chinensis)在中国的适生性及其潜在地理分布模拟预测[J]. 热带地理, 2017, 37(2):218-225.
利用181个地理分布调查数据,基于ArcGIS对中华猕猴桃的目前分布进行空间重建,利用MaxEnt生态位模型对中华猕猴桃在中国的适生性及其未来气候变化下潜在可扩散地理范围进行了模拟与预测,分析中华猕猴桃在中国的适生性和扩散潜力及其空间格局,在未来气候变化背景下,预测中华猕猴桃当代及未来至2050年适生区分布格局变化。结果表明:中华猕猴桃当前的潜在适生区主要分布在23°―35°N之间和102°E以东的中亚热带山地丘陵区,如秦岭―大巴山、云贵高原、罗霄山脉―南岭和武夷山脉等地区。中华猕猴桃在当前气候条件下适生区总面积为2 382 381 km<sup>2</sup>,占中国版图的25.19%,在中等温室气体排放(RCP4.5)情景下预测至2050年,适生区总面积相对当前气候情景略有减少,但空间分布格局变化强烈。预测结果表明:在未来气候变暖影响下,中华猕猴桃潜在适生区具有向北或高纬度地区迁移的趋势。
|
| [8] |
郭晓成. 日本选育的猕猴桃品种简介[J]. 中国果树, 2006, 30(3):63-64.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
何水涛. 日本猕猴桃和柿子的生产动向[J]. 果树资源学报, 2015, 36(4):53+60.
|
| [11] |
蒋青, 梁忆冰, 王乃扬, 等. 有害生物危险性评价的定量分析方法研究[J]. 植物检疫, 1995, 9(4):208-211.
|
| [12] |
李俊峰, 阿地力•沙塔尔, 喻峰, 等. 世界性害虫葡萄花翅小卷蛾入侵我国的风险分析[J]. 生物安全学报, 2017, 26(1):52-57.
|
| [13] |
秦誉嘉, 吕文诚, 赵守歧, 等. 考虑灌溉及气候变化条件下葡萄花翅小卷蛾在中国的潜在地理分布[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(3):599-605.
|
| [14] |
Grape berries attacked by Lobesia botrana larvae are more easily infected by Aspergillus section Nigri (black aspergilli) ochratoxigenic species. Two-year field trials were carried out in Apulia (Italy) to evaluate a bioinsecticide control strategy against L. botrana and the indirect effect on reducing ochratoxin A (OTA) contamination in vineyards. A commercial Bacillus thuringiensis formulate and an experimental Beauveria bassiana (ITEM-1559) formulate were tested in two vineyards cultivated with the same grape variety, Negroamaro, but with two different training systems (espalier and little-arbor techniques). In both years and training systems the treatments by B. bassiana ITEM-1559 significantly controlled L. botrana larvae attacks with effectiveness similar to B. thuringensis (more than 20%). A significant reduction of OTA concentrations (up to 80% compared to untreated controls) was observed only in the first year in both training systems, when the metereological parameters prior to harvest were more favorable to the insect attack. Results of field trials showed that B. bassiana ITEM-1559 is a valid bioinsecticide against L. botrana and that grape moth biocontrol is a strategy to reduce OTA contamination in vineyard in seasons with heavy natural infestation.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
任立, 张润志. 进境植物检疫性有害生物名录中二种象虫学名的订正[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2010, 47(1):193-196.7
|
| [17] |
张建华, 徐泽海, 谢辉, 等. 香蕉穿孔线虫在北京地区的适应性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2008, 34(1):72-75.
|
| [18] |
李一农, 李芳荣. 深圳口岸旅检截获香蕉穿孔线虫[J]. 植物检疫, 2004, 26(3):163.
|
| [19] |
李一农, 李芳荣, 罗海燕, 等. 外来入侵生物香蕉穿孔线虫管理对策[J]. 植物保护, 2006, 32(6):119-121.
|
| [20] |
黄法余, 梁琼超, 黄箭, 等. 从进口凤梨科植物截获香蕉穿孔线虫[J]. 植物检疫, 2002, 24(5):267.
|
| [21] |
边勇, 周琦, 高文娜, 等. 北京口岸进境苗木线虫检出分析[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(4):148-152.
|
| [22] |
姚卫民, 刘铮, 韦斌. 香蕉穿孔线虫入侵广西的风险分析[J]. 植物检疫, 2011, 25(6):43-44.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
朱崧琪, 梁柱伟, 汪绍文. 《中华人民共和国进境植物检疫性有害生物名录》更新项目简介[J]. 中国海关, 2021, 24(7):54.
|
| [25] |
王沛, 胡美玲, 肖颖, 等. 玫瑰蜗牛入侵中国的风险评估[J]. 中国口岸科学技术, 2020, 23(9):31-36.
|
| [26] |
索南措, 黄远志, 李彦忠, 等. 苜蓿黄萎病的发生、危害及检测[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(9):2384-2394.
|
| [27] |
王坤, 石娟, 孙双艳. 植物种质资源引进风险分析方法概述[J]. 生物安全学报, 2024, 33(1):1-6.
|
| [28] |
刘博, 姜帆, 黄静, 等. 我国进境植物检疫性有害生物检疫鉴定标准浅析[J]. 生物安全学报, 2023, 32(2):93-98.
|
| [29] |
刘爱华, 胡冬青, 陈长法, 等. 香蕉穿孔线虫在我国入侵状况研究进展[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2011, 31(5):106-109.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |