Effects of Concentrations of Fish Protein Fertilizer on Growth, Quality and Yield of Small Fruit Watermelon

JIAWenhong

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 66-70.

PDF(1278 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1278 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 66-70. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0023

Effects of Concentrations of Fish Protein Fertilizer on Growth, Quality and Yield of Small Fruit Watermelon

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this experiment, fish protein fertilizer was diluted to 1200, 1000, 800 and 500 times respectively, with clear water as the control. The watermelon plants were sprayed from the pollination stage to the fruit enlargement stage. Indicators such as the growth status of watermelon plants, fruit yield, and taste quality were measured. Variance analysis was used to comprehensively evaluate the effects of different spraying concentrations of fish protein fertilizer on the growth, quality and yield of small fruit watermelons. The results showed that watermelon treated with 500 times dilution had better performance in fruit development, plant growth and disease resistance. The average stem diameter during growth period was 7.10 mm, the average plant height was 218.15 cm, the average maximum leaf area was 699.48 cm2, the average relative content of chlorophyll was 55.33, and the average nitrogen content was 18.58 mg/g. The weight of single melon was 1.22 kg, equivalent to the yield of 35428.8 kg/hm2, the thickness of the peel was 0.43 cm, the content of soluble solid in the center and the edge were 10.8% and 10.0%, respectively, the taste was crisp and the fiber was less. The optimal concentration of fish protein fertilizer for small fruit watermelon is 500 times dilution.

Key words

small fruit watermelon / fish protein / fertilizer / concentration / growth / quality / yield

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIA Wenhong. Effects of Concentrations of Fish Protein Fertilizer on Growth, Quality and Yield of Small Fruit Watermelon[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2026, 16(4): 66-70 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0023

References

[1]
张莹, 马超, 曾剑波, 等. 北京地区小型西瓜优势品种推介术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2018(9):15-17.
[2]
李晶, 郁继华, 武玥, 等. 不同小果型西瓜品种品质评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(11):61-67.
[3]
李婷, 雷慧, 刘雪莹, 等. 甘氨酸和鱼蛋白在网纹甜瓜上应用效果比较[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2021, 36(2):47-51.
[4]
何伟忠, 韦凯丽, 华震宇, 等. 不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及评价指标[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9):1652-1658.
【目的】研究不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及其评价指标。【方法】以6个不同品种西瓜为研究对象,分析样品中16种成分含量,并通过INQ(营养质量指数),研究受试成分营养质量的品种间差异,通过主成分分析,筛选营养质量评价指标。【结果】6种不同品种西瓜烟酸、脂肪、钠和锌INQ均小于1,碳水化合物INQ在1.38~1.44,钾和维生素B<sub>2</sub> INQ均大于2;VB<sub>1</sub>、蛋白、纤维、锰、铁、钙、铜、磷和镁INQ因品种的不同而处于不同营养水平,其中VB<sub>1</sub>、镁、锰、铁4项指标的负荷量相对较高。【结论】VB<sub>1</sub>、蛋白、纤维、锰、铁、钙、铜、磷、镁可用于体现西瓜营养质量的品种间差异,其中VB<sub>1</sub>、镁、锰、铁指标适合作为西瓜营养质量评价指标。
[5]
高玉琦, 胡宝贵. 北京市西瓜产业发展现状及对策建议[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(11):87-89.
[6]
潘烨, 谢贞清, 金娟. 鱼蛋白有机肥料对番茄果实甜度及风味的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2021, 41(10):62-64.
[7]
黄娜, 柳建良, 马路凯, 等. 鱼蛋白多肽水溶肥对韭菜品质和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(8):209-218.
[8]
李方勇, 刘庆叶, 黄忠阳, 等. γ-聚谷氨酸和鱼蛋白水溶肥对松花菜生长和产量的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2024(4):68-71.
[9]
张莹雪, 刘文钰, 李超, 等. 海藻多肽鱼蛋白肥对茄子生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2024(1):64-66.
[10]
马蓉, 任元龙, 邓文霞, 等. 不同菌剂与生物刺激素组合对盐碱胁迫、低温干旱盐碱复合胁迫下西瓜幼苗生长及生理的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(24):155-165.
[11]
周雄, 黄吉人. 鱼蛋白氨基酸水溶肥料的制备及应用研究[J]. 肥料与健康, 2021, 48(3):52-55.
[12]
张莹, 曾剑波, 马超. 4种功能性肥料对小型西瓜生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2021, 52(4):4-7.
[13]
林湘雪, 何咏梅, 辛恺达, 等. 鱼蛋白水溶氨基酸肥的制备及其对植物生长发育的影响[J]. 福建农业科技, 2024, 55(10):21-28.
[14]
陈祥福, 魏萍, 刘召部, 等. 鱼蛋白套餐肥对设施西瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(19):136-140.
[15]
黄小玲, 罗宁, 黄兰彬, 等. 不同肥料对香浓甜瓜产量及品质的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2024(11):29-31.
[16]
张依哲, 陈梦微, 张成磊, 等. 鱼蛋白对西瓜种子发芽特性的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2023, 41(3):15-17.
[17]
安亚杰. 鱼蛋白:未来十年,将引爆特肥圈的大单品[J]. 营销界(农资与市场), 2018(19):65-71.
[18]
金艳杰, 张宇, 赵国龙, 等. 鱼蛋白水溶肥对设施草莓发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 北京农学院学报2025, 40(2):41-44.
[19]
谷旭琳. 深海鱼蛋白水溶肥在温室草莓上的应用效果评价[J]. 电大理工, 2023(1):14-18.
[20]
李婷, 张静, 曲明山, 等. 喷施鱼蛋白对网纹甜瓜生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(6):58-63.
PDF(1278 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/