Effects of Soil Mulching on Soil Organic Carbon and Enzyme Activities

XUERunyu, ZHAOKegang, SUNShengxue, ZHANGQingwen, LIMengni, LIUGuocheng

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5) : 61-70.

PDF(2343 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2343 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5) : 61-70. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0025

Effects of Soil Mulching on Soil Organic Carbon and Enzyme Activities

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As an important agricultural measure for soil warming and moisture retention, the long-term application of plastic film mulching has drawn much attention for its impact on soil quality. This study took the uncovered area, open-field mulched area and greenhouse mulched area in Xi’an as research objects, and systematically analyzed the regulatory effects of different mulching patterns on soil organic carbon (SOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM) and enzyme activities. The results showed that (1) mulching significantly increased the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) contents in the surface soil (0-20 cm), with the greatest increase observed in the mulched greenhouse plots. (2) All mulching treatments significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) content, especially in the topsoil layer (0-10 cm). (3) The distribution of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) showed spatial differences. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, the DOC content in the open-field mulched plots was lower than that in the non-mulched plots, while in the greenhouse mulched plots, the DOC content was higher than that in the non-mulched plots. In the soil layer of 10 to 30 cm, the DOC content in both mulched soils was higher than that in the non-mulched treatment. (4) Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy revealed that mulching enhanced the fluorescence intensity of the humification component (V region) in DOM, especially in the soil layer of 10 to 20 cm, which had a positive effect on soil humification. (5) Enzyme activity analysis showed that both mulching treatments stimulated the activity of soil β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and greenhouse mulching also increased the activity of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG). The results of this study reveal the effects of the film mulching technology on SOC, DOM and enzyme activity, providing a theoretical basis for the rational use of plastic films and offering technological support for a deeper understanding of the migration and transformation of SOC, DOM and enzyme activity under the influence of film mulching.

Key words

soil mulching / organic carbon / dissolved organic carbon / dissolved organic matter / enzyme activity

Cite this article

Download Citations
XUE Runyu , ZHAO Kegang , SUN Shengxue , et al . Effects of Soil Mulching on Soil Organic Carbon and Enzyme Activities[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2026, 16(5): 61-70 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0025

References

[1]
孙源辰, 何文清, 靳拓, 等. 西北六省区农田地膜残留特征与关键影响因素[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(6):1260-1270.
[2]
GAO H, YAN C, LIU Q, et al. Exploring optimal soil mulching to enhance yield and water use efficiency in maize cropping in China: A meta-analysis[J]. Agricultural water management, 2019, 225:105741.
[3]
POZZER A, TSIMPIDI A P, KARYDIS V A, et al. Impact of agricultural emission reductions on fine-particulate matter and public health[J]. Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2017, 17(20):12813-12826.
[4]
LI N, QI W, JIANG C, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil respiration and its sensitivity to temperature and water content[J]. Environmental technology & innovation, 2024, 36:103780.
[5]
史文娇, 汪景宽, 祝凤春, 等. 施肥与覆膜对棕壤Olsen-P剖面分布及动态变化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007(2):248-253.
[6]
ZHANG H, LIU Q, YU X, et al. Effects of plastic mulch duration on nitrogen mineralization andleaching in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivated land in the Yimeng Mountainous Area, China[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2012, 158:164-171.
[7]
LIU X J, WANG J C, LU S H, et al. Effects of non-flooded mulching cultivation on crop yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient balance in rice-wheat cropping systems[J]. Field crops research, 2003, 83(3):297-311.
[8]
张成娥, 梁银丽, 贺秀斌. 地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2002(4):508-512.
[9]
杨那, 毛晓涵, 李彦, 等. 农田土壤有机碳及活性碳组分对秸秆和地膜覆盖响应的Meta分析[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(4):2292-2300.
[10]
REN T, UKALSKA-JARUGA A, SMRECZAK B, et al. Dissolved organic carbon in cropland soils: A global meta-analysis of management effects[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2024, 371:109080.
[11]
GUO C, LIU X, HE X. A global meta-analysis of crop yield and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions under nitrogen fertilizer application[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 831:154982.
[12]
UKALSKA-JARUGA A, KLIMKOWICZ-PAWLAS A, SMRECZAK B. Characterization of organic matter fractions in the top layer of soils under different land uses in Central-Eastern Europe[J]. Soil use and management, 2019, 35(4):595-606.
[13]
DENG J, FROLKING S, BAJGAIN R, et al. Improving a biogeochemical model to simulate microbial-mediated carbon dynamics in Agricultural ecosystems[J]. Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2021, 13(11):e2021MS002752.
[14]
何冬梅, 王火, 祝亚云, 等. 盐城滨海湿地土壤溶解性有机质的光谱特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(6):781-787.
[15]
陈丽铭, 吴月颖, 李财生, 等. 土壤溶解性有机质分子特征对不同来源有机肥分解的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(4):1101-1112.
[16]
张建, 石义静, 崔寅, 等. 土壤中邻苯二甲酸酯类物质的降解及其对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(12):3056-3061.
[17]
丰晨晨, 陈悦, 陈富鹏, 等. 聚乙烯微塑料对冬小麦生长及土壤酶活性影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2024, 58(3):496-507.
[18]
黄佳惠, 张瑶, 肖凯, 等. 中国农田土壤质量评价指标及其发展趋势[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2024, 38(1):26-33.
中国现有农田土壤质量评价指标主要包括物理、化学、生物3类,但当前的指标体系还存在诸如对生物指标重视程度不足、部分指标检测方法技术落后、指标之间不成体系等问题。在总结此3类常规农田土壤质量评价指标的基础上,着重介绍土壤中微量营养元素、重金属、微塑料、农药等化学类物质的定性与定量以及土壤微生物群落组成等非常规指标的应用,并对土壤分析方法和分析设备的升级和研发、生物传感器技术等领域的研究及其在农田土壤质量评价中的应用进行了展望。此可为中国农田土壤质量评价体系的发展提供参考。
[19]
MA Q J, ZHANG Q, NIU J, et al. Plastic-film mulch cropping increases mineral-associated organic carbon accumulation in maize cropped soils as revealed by natural 13C/12C ratio signature[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 370:114350.
[20]
HUANG Y, ZHAO Y, WANG J, et al. LDPE microplastic films alter microbial community composition and enzymatic activities in soil[J]. Environmental pollution, 2019, 254:112983.
[21]
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2000:39-97.
[22]
NELSON D W, SOMMERS L E, Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter[M]. Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, WI, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,1996:961-1010.
[23]
JONES D, WILLETT V. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2006, 38(5):991-999.
[24]
MOORHEAD D L, SINSABAUGH R L, HILL B H, et al. Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2016, 93:1-7.
[25]
周丽娜, 雷金银. 覆膜方式对坡耕地春玉米产量、土壤水分和养分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(33):20-25.
为了探讨覆膜对宁南山区坡耕地春玉米栽培的可行性,寻求合适的覆膜方式。在宁南山区坡耕地条件下,通过田间小区试验研究了裸地平作(CK)、垄沟不覆膜(NM)、垄沟全覆膜(WM)和垄沟半覆膜(HM)4个不同覆膜方式对春玉米产量、土壤水分和养分含量的影响。结果表明,相对于CK处理,WM和HM处理能显著提高春玉米产量,分别提高了65.4%和62.5%。WM和HM处理也能增加0~80 cm土壤含水量和储水能力,提高土壤氮磷钾速效养分含量,较好地维持土地生产力。综合考虑春玉米产量、土壤储水保水能力和土壤肥力维持等因素,在宁南山区坡耕地春玉米植种中,垄沟全覆膜和垄沟半覆膜都是较好的覆膜栽培措施。
[26]
师玥, 栾璐, 蒋希芝, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对土壤质量和大蒜产量及品质的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(9):5464-5473.
[27]
王庆鲁, 祝鹏飞, 丁凡. 地膜覆盖和有机肥施用对农田土壤和作物C、N、P化学计量学的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4):1191-1197.
为了解长期地膜覆盖和施用有机肥对农田土壤和作物C、N、P化学计量学的影响,于2015年采集沈阳农业大学长期地膜覆盖和施肥定位试验(建于1987年)土壤和玉米植株不同组织(根、秸秆、叶片、籽粒),测定了土壤和作物C、N、P含量。结果表明:长期地膜覆盖和施用有机肥均对土壤pH产生显著影响(P<0.01),且两者存在显著的交互作用(P=0.001);地膜覆盖对土壤全碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮、有效磷,以及土壤C∶N∶P化学计量学均没有显著影响(P>0.05),而施用有机肥会显著增加土壤全碳、全氮、全磷含量以及碱解氮和有效磷含量(P<0.01),降低土壤C/P和N/P(P<0.01);除了叶片N含量和籽粒P含量及C/P以外,地膜覆盖对玉米各组织中C、N、P含量及C∶N∶P化学计量均没有显著影响(P>0.05);而有机肥施用显著增加了玉米各组织中N含量(P<0.05),从而降低C/N(P<0.05),但只增加了根和籽实中P含量(P<0.05),降低了玉米籽实的C/P(P<0.001)。综上所述,土壤和作物的C、N、P化学计量学随长期施用有机肥而变化,但受地膜覆盖的影响较小。
[28]
胡志娥, 肖谋良, 王双, 等. 地膜覆盖对农田土壤养分和生态酶计量学特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(3):1649-1656.
[29]
HANSEN A M, KRAUS T E C, PELLERIN B A, et al. Optical properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM): effects of biological and photolytic degradation[J]. Limnology and oceanography, 2016, 61(3):1015-1032.
[30]
MO F, YU K L, CROWTHER T W, et al. How plastic mulching affects net primary productivity, soil C fluxes and organic carbon balance in dry agroecosystems in China[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 263:121470.
PDF(2343 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/