PDF(1666 KB)
Estimation of Environment Bearing Capacity of Animal Farming Based on Carbon-water Footprint
ZHANGQihe, CHENChenchen, ZHANGPanlong, YANGYuchen, HEXueni, ZHANGYuxian, ZHUKebai, ZHAOZhiqiang, MAXingwang, CHUTianshu
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7) : 52-61.
PDF(1666 KB)
PDF(1666 KB)
Estimation of Environment Bearing Capacity of Animal Farming Based on Carbon-water Footprint
Regional balance between planting and breeding is an important goal of green agricultural development. Pollution to the atmosphere and water environment caused by breeding is one of the factors restricting the green and efficient development of animal breeding industry. This paper conducted modeling work of the environmental bearing capacity of animal farming, evaluated the appropriate breeding volume in the region, and provided a reference for regional balance between planting and breeding and environmental protection. The animal breeding production system in the North China Plain was taken as the research object. The results of the second national pollution source census were used to calculate the carbon footprint and grey water footprint of the animal breeding industry in 2017. According to the regional water environment, atmospheric environment, farmland nutrients and policy-oriented constraints, the linear programming and scenario analysis methods were used to model and simulate the environmental bearing capacity of animal farming in the North China Plain. The results showed that based on the evaluation and optimization of carbon footprint and grey water footprint, the environmental bearing capacity of animal farming in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei Province, Shandong Province and Henan Province was 10 million, 20 million, 290 million, 580 million and 1.03 billion heads respectively, which far exceeded the current breeding volume and were not overloaded. When the water environment pressure increased, the environmental bearing capacity of animal farming showed a downward trend. When the ammonia nitrogen emissions from water pollutants of animal breeding industry were reduced by 50%, the environmental bearing capacity of animal farming in the North China Plain increased to 2.04 billion heads, an increase of 66.7%; once the surface water resources began to decrease, the animal bearing capacity was constrained because it was lower than the policy-guided value. It could be seen that reducing the discharge of water pollutants alleviated the pressure of water shortage in the North China Plain on the development of animal breeding industry. It was recommended that animal farms should strengthen anaerobic fermentation engineering facilities, reduced the emission of water pollutants such as ammonia nitrogen; the government should increase subsidies for the purchase and production of agricultural machinery for returning manure to the fields, to achieve efficient return of manure to the fields; green accounts should be established for farms, and fiscal means should be used to guide the green transformation of the industry.
animal farming / environmental bearing capacity / carbon footprint / grey water footprint / North China Plain
| [1] |
Food systems are the largest users of land and water resources worldwide. Using a multi-model approach to track food through the global trade network, we calculated the land footprint (LF) and water footprint (WF) of food consumption in the European Union (EU). We estimated the EU LF as 140-222 Mha yr and WF as 569-918 km yr. These amounts are 5-7% of the global LF and 6-10% of the global WF of agriculture, with the EU representing 6% of the global population. We also calculated the global LF of livestock grazing, accounting only for grass eaten, to be 1,411-1,657 Mha yr, and the global LF of agriculture to be 2,809-3,014 Mha yr, which is about two-thirds of what the Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics (FAOSTAT) database reports. We discuss here the different methods for calculating the LF for livestock grazing, underscoring the need for a consistent methodology when monitoring the food LF and WF reduction goals set by the EU's Farm To Fork Strategy.© 2023. The Author(s).
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
张洁瑕, 陈佑启, 郝晋珉, 等. 乡村振兴战略框架下的区域农业生态系统研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(5):92-105.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
The degrading impacts of livestock production on the environment are well acknowledged. Although ruminants are much studied due to their large contribution to climate change impact, monogastrics are also known to carry a significant load, and mitigation options need investigation. Here, the climate change impact and water scarcity impact of Finnish pork production was investigated using the life cycle assessment approach.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
邢浩翰, 谢昀, 郑炜超, 等. 基于水足迹的鸡蛋生产耗水核算与评价[J]. 中国家禽, 2024, 46(6):72-78.
|
| [14] |
楚天舒, 黄译萱, 赖世宣, 等. 中国各省市区种养业灰水足迹分析与评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(11):53-64.
|
| [15] |
国家统计局农村社会经济调查司. 中国农村统计年鉴——2018[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
|
| [16] |
国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2018[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
|
| [17] |
中华人民共和国生态环境部,国家统计局,中华人民共和国农业农村部. 第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2020-06-08/2024-12-10. Https://www.mee.gov.cn/home/ztbd/rdzl/wrypc/zlxz/202006/t20200616_784745.html.
|
| [18] |
IPCC. 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventory[R]. Switzerland: Intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2019.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
中国城市温室气体工作组. 中国产品全生命周期温室气体排放系数集(2022)[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2022.
|
| [21] |
李慧, 郑王睿, 刘耕源. 灰水足迹研究进展与方法学改进[J]. 中国环境管理, 2024, 16(1):127-135.
|
| [22] |
河南省生态环境厅,河南省统计局,河南省农业农村厅. 河南省第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2020-11-30/2024-12-10. Https://www.henan.gov.cn/2020/12-01/1916810.html.
|
| [23] |
山东省生态环境厅,山东省统计局,山东省农业农村厅,山东省畜牧兽医局. 山东省第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2020-06-09/2024-12-10. Http://zlc.sdein.gov.cn/zkgb/202010/P020201015634885508138.pdf.
|
| [24] |
北京市生态环境局. 北京市第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2021-07-28/2024-12-10. Https://sthjj.beijing.gov.cn/bjhrb/index/xxgk69/sthjlyzwg/wrygl/11033870/index.html.
|
| [25] |
天津市生态环境局,天津市统计局,天津市农业农村委员会,天津市第二次全国污染源普查领导小组办公室. 天津市第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2020-09-10/2024-12-10. https://sthj.tj.gov.cn/ZWGK4828/ZFXXGK8438/FDZDGK27/TJXX158/202010/W020201022604842469697.pdf.
|
| [26] |
河北省生态环境厅,河北省统计局. 河北省第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL]. 2020-10-30/2024-12-10. Http://tjj.hebei.gov.cn/res/hetj/upload/file/20201030/%E6%B2%B3%E5%8C%97%E7%9C%81%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E5%85%A8%E5%9B%BD%E6%B1%A1%E6%9F%93%E6%BA%90%E6%99%AE%E6%9F%A5%E5%85%AC%E6%8A%A5_170503.pdf.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
陈淑芬, 郭莲秀, 尹萌萌, 等. 生态沟渠植被对坡地径流冲刷物质的拦截去除效应试验研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2016, 26(S1):158-161.
|
| [30] |
朱晓瑞, 张春雪, 郑向群, 等. 天津地区生态沟渠不同植物配置对氮磷去除效果研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2020, 42(2):170-175.
|
| [31] |
顾兆俊, 刘兴国, 程果锋, 等. 淡水池塘4种生态沟渠净化效果研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(13):285-291.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
中华人民共和国生态环境部. GB 3838-2002,地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
|
| [34] |
中国环境监测总站. 国家水质自动综合监管平台[EB/OL]. 2024-04-25/2024-12-10. Https://szzdjc.cnemc.cn:8070/GJZ/Business/Publish/Main.html.
|
| [35] |
温源远, 张建宇, 于晓龙, 等. 全球碳排放碳市场现状趋势及对我国的影响[J]. 中国投资, 2024(Z5):70-74.
|
| [36] |
农业部办公厅. 畜禽粪污土地承载力测算技术指南[EB/OL]. 2018-01-26/2024-12-10. Http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/XMYS/201801/t20180122_6135486.htm.
|
| [37] |
中华人民共和国农业农村部. NY/T3877—2021,畜禽粪便土地承载力测算方法[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021.
|
| [38] |
北京市农业农村局. 北京市“十四五”时期农业科技发展规划[EB/OL]. 2021-12-31/2024-12-10. Https://www.beijing.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengcefagui/202207/t20220726_2779748.html.
|
| [39] |
天津市农业农村委员会. 天津市畜牧业“十四五”发展规划[EB/OL]. 2020-10-10/2024-12-10. Https://nync.tj.gov.cn/ZWGK0/ZCFG152022/202110/W020211011536817738675.pdf.
|
| [40] |
河北省农业农村厅. 河北省“十四五”畜牧兽医行业发展规划[EB/OL]. 2022-06-09/2024-12-10. Https://nync.hebei.gov.cn/uploads/www/file/202206/1655453122427.pdf.
|
| [41] |
山东省畜牧兽医局,山东省发展和改革委员会. 山东省“十四五”畜牧业发展规划[EB/OL]. 2021-11-01/2024-12-10. Http://xm.shandong.gov.cn/art/2021/11/1/art_117619_10298661.html.
|
| [42] |
河南省人民政府. 河南省“十四五”乡村振兴和农业农村现代化规划[EB/OL]. 2022-01-21/2024-12-10. Https://www.henan.gov.cn/2022/01-21/2386282.html.
|
| [43] |
国家发展改革委. “十四五”重点流域水环境综合治理规划[EB/OL]. 2018-01-26/2024-12-10. Https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/12/5667781/files/764d029d91ae4bf39cf836627599869c.pdf.
|
| [44] |
张胜利, 秦永杰. 河北省规模养殖场畜禽粪污资源化利用现状及问题[J]. 北方牧业, 2023(22):5.
|
| [45] |
姚惠娇, 韦伟, 周会, 等. 典型生猪养殖场粪污产生和排放情况[J]. 北方牧业, 2024(13):7.
|
| [46] |
史晓晴, 张鑫, 徐霄, 等. 生猪养殖场碳核算评估分级标识与碳抵消路径——以衢州市170家生猪养殖场为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(12):141-151.
|
| [47] |
卢耕雨. 碳账户金融实现精准减碳——以衢州市绿色金改为例[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2023.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |