Effects of Soil Conditioner on Soil Fertility and Fruit Quality in Continuous Cropping Peach Orchards

MAChang, ZHAOKegang, CAIMiao, LIMengni, ZHANGQingwen

Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 42-55.

PDF(2897 KB)
Home Journals Journal of Agriculture
Journal of Agriculture

Abbreviation (ISO4): Journal of Agriculture      Editor in chief: Shiyan QIAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2897 KB)
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 42-55. DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0088

Effects of Soil Conditioner on Soil Fertility and Fruit Quality in Continuous Cropping Peach Orchards

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Long-term peach cultivation depletes soil nutrients, reduces microbial activity, and decreases organic matter, thereby affecting fruit quality. A field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of soil conditioner application combined with fertilization and water management on soil properties, organic carbon fractions, microbial biomass C/N, water-stable aggregates, and peach quality. Six treatments were designed: no fertilization (CK), farmers’ conventional fertilization with regular water management (NPK+W), farmers’ conventional fertilization combined with optimized water and fertilizer management (NPK+MW), soil conditioner application with regular water management (BGA+W), soil conditioner application combined with optimized water and fertilizer management (BGA+MW), and a combined treatment of 50% soil conditioner + 50% conventional fertilizer with optimized water and fertilizer management (H-BGA+NPK+MW). The results showed that BGA+MW significantly reduced soil pH (6.96%-13.53% during fruit expansion; 7.08%-16.77% at maturity), and increased nitrate-N (15.2%-310.7%) and ammonium-N (236.1%-315.5%). H-BGA+NPK+MW decreased soil bulk density (10.69%-11.36% during expansion; 7.80% at maturity) and improved aggregate stability, with average weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) increased by 32.3% and 100% (expansion) and 3.3% and 9.8% (maturity), respectively. Treatments enhanced organic carbon fractions and soil microbial biomass carbon. NPK+W increased soil organic carbon (SOC) by 31.77% compared with BGA+W during expansion, while H-BGA+NPK+MW showed the highest SOC at maturity. NPK+MW promoted microbial biomass carbon in expansion, and H-BGA+NPK+MW did in maturity. H-BGA+NPK+MW increased soluble solids, and BGA+MW increased soluble sugars. The BGA soil conditioner improves soil microbial activity, organic carbon fractions, and fruit quality in continuous cropping orchards, supporting sustainable production.

Key words

BGA soil conditioner / continuous cropping orchard / soil fertility / soil carbon components / fruit quality

Cite this article

Download Citations
MA Chang , ZHAO Kegang , CAI Miao , et al . Effects of Soil Conditioner on Soil Fertility and Fruit Quality in Continuous Cropping Peach Orchards[J]. Journal of Agriculture. 2026, 16(8): 42-55 https://doi.org/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0088

References

[1]
王力荣. 我国桃产业现状与发展建议[J]. 中国果树, 2021(10):1-5.
[2]
朱慧敏. 引进桃新品种在陕西关中地区物候期观察与果实品质评价[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
[3]
蒋晓梅. 不同施肥处理对桃园土壤酶活性及植株生长的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016.
[4]
张良英, 王永熙, 王小伟, 等. 草炭对桃园土壤理化性状及桃树生物效应的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2008(3):145-149.
[5]
罗华, 李敏, 胡大刚, 等. 不同有机肥对肥城桃果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(4):955-964.
[6]
王钰馨. 有机肥对肥桃土壤养分、树体营养和果实品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016.
[7]
索琳娜, 马杰, 刘宝存, 等. 土壤调理剂应用现状及施用风险研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(6):1141-1149.
[8]
杨凯. 土壤激活剂bga在滨海盐土上的应用效果研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2006.
[9]
王磊, 任树梅, 张文理, 等. 有机肥料bga激活剂对日光温室内土壤含水率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005(S1):228-231.
[10]
王勇, 杨培岭, 任树梅. 有机抗旱剂bga对大叶黄杨生长及耗水特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006(3):150-153,157.
[11]
王勇, 杨培岭, 任树梅, 等. 有机抗旱肥料bga的节水机制及其施用技术[J]. 节水灌溉, 2006(2):1-4.
[12]
曾征. 不同土壤调理剂对连作土壤的改良效果及对玉米产量形成的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2025, 53(5):133-135+168.
[13]
刘仁根, 林洪鑫, 袁展汽, 等. Bga土壤调理剂对木薯产量的影响研究初报[J]. 江西农业学报, 2012, 24(5):119-120.
[14]
刘君恬, 邹维娜, 袁琳, 等. 圈围对海岸带湿地土壤有机碳及活性碳组分的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(9):4213-4222.
[15]
ARAI M, IKAZAKI K, TERAJIMA Y, et al. Effects of organic amendment on earthworm density and biomass in sugarcane fields with different soil pH[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2024, 122:103645.
[16]
纪立东, 杨建国, 尚红莺, 等. Bga土壤调理剂对盐渍化土壤和枸杞生长发育的影响[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 33(3):293-297.
[17]
郭永忠, 景春梅, 王峰, 等. Bga土壤调理剂对土壤结构及养分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(12):87-90.
[18]
CUI H, SHUTES B, HOU S N, et al. Long-term organic fertilization increases phosphorus content but reduces its release in soil aggregates[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2024, 203:105684.
[19]
GOPINATH K A, SAHA S, MINA B L, et al. Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2008, 82(1):51-60.
[20]
DAS B, CHAKRABORTY D, SINGH V K, et al. Effect of integrated nutrient management practice on soil aggregate properties, its stability and aggregate-associated carbon content in an intensive rice-wheat system[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2014, 136:9-18.
[21]
MA F, LIU L, HAN X, et al. Using a novel vector length stability index (VLSI) to evaluate soil aggregate stability: A preliminary study[J]. Catena, 2024, 240:107995.
[22]
BANDYOPADHYAY K K, MISRA A K, GHOSH P K, et al. Effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2010, 110(1):115-125.
[23]
王周, 李强, 彭畅, 等. 有机肥氮替代50%化肥氮有效改善吉林省中部地区黑土团聚体性状[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(12):2247-2257.
[24]
杨金翰, 田小明, 胡晨阳, 等. 氮肥配施调理剂对土壤团聚体和有机碳及莜麦产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024.
[25]
董少文, 马淑花, 初茉, 等. 粉煤灰基土壤调理剂作用下盐碱土壤微观结构变化规律[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3):357-365.
以宁夏银北地区典型盐碱土壤为研究对象,采用X射线衍射(XRD)、红外光谱(FTIR)、比表面全自动物理吸附仪(BET)以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)等测试技术对粉煤灰基土壤调理剂作用下盐碱土壤颗粒微观结构进行研究和系统表征。结果表明,利用调理剂改良后土壤矿物的主要成分未发生改变,但是添加调理剂后土壤有新晶相方解石生成;土壤的pH值大幅降低,由9.01降低到7.66;土壤红外吸收变化较小,Si-O-Si和有机质吸收峰略有增强;随着调理剂的增加,土壤小颗粒开始团聚,孔隙率逐渐增加,以添加2.5wt%组为例,15天后样品孔隙率达到21.30%,30天后样品孔隙率达到25.29%,约为未添加调理剂组的两倍;土壤颗粒的比表面积略有增加,30天后由初始的23.06 m2/g增加到25.55 m2/g。
[26]
袁颖红, 李辉信, 黄欠如, 等. 长期施肥对水稻土颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008(1):353-360.
[27]
ZHANG Z, GAO H, GAO X, et al. Short-term warming supports mineral-associated carbon accrual in abandoned croplands[J]. Nature communications, 2025, 16(1):344.
[28]
CESARANO G, DE FILIPPIS F, LA STORIA A, et al. Organic amendment type and application frequency affect crop yields, soil fertility and microbiome composition[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2017, 120:254-264.
[29]
龚伟, 颜晓元, 蔡祖聪, 等. 长期施肥对小麦-玉米作物系统土壤颗粒有机碳和氮的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008(11):2375-2381.
[30]
陈武荣, 刘勤, 禹洪双, 等. 长期不同施肥处理水稻土溶解性有机质组分含量及其特性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(6):111-116.
[31]
倪进治, 徐建民, 谢正苗, 等. 不同施肥处理下土壤水溶性有机碳含量及其组成特征的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2003(5):724-730.
[32]
KING A E, CONGREVES K A, DEEN B, et al. Quantifying the relationships between soil fraction mass, fraction carbon, and total soil carbon to assess mechanisms of physical protection[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2019, 135:95-107.
[33]
张琪, 刘彦波, 丁金鹏, 等. 炭基牛粪有机肥对盐渍化水稻土水稳性团聚体组成和有机碳分布的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2024.
[34]
林小兵, 柳开楼, 黄尚书, 等. 长期施肥对旱地红壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(4):119-128.
为探究南方长期不同施肥对双季玉米土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性的影响,依托江西进贤35 a旱地红壤长期定位试验,选取不施肥(CK)、单施化肥(NPK)、化肥和新鲜猪粪配施(NPKM)、单施新鲜猪粪(OM)4个处理,测定双季玉米成熟期0~20 cm,20~40 cm土层土壤养分、微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性并分析了微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性与土壤养分的相关性。结果表明,长期施肥(NPK、NPKM和OM)显著提高土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性,春玉米时期,0~40 cm土层各施肥处理土壤微生物生物量碳、氮含量较CK分别提升了67.05%~159.15%,3.33%~62.37%;过氧化氢酶、磷酸单脂酶、脲酶和蔗糖酶活性分别提高了0.22%~79.71%,9.82%~59.51%,8.73%~82.37%,66.67%~538.89%;秋玉米时期,0~40 cm土层各施肥处理土壤微生物生物量碳、氮含量较CK分别提升了36.30%~136.72%,17.09%~47.29%;过氧化氢酶、磷酸单脂酶、脲酶和蔗糖酶活性分别提高了7.41%~74.55%,22.69%~57.39%,18.85%~58.98%,51.70%~216.67%,其中,以NPKM处理的提升效果最佳。总体上,0~20 cm土层土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性高于20~40 cm,秋玉米时期土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和酶活性高于春玉米时期。NPKM和OM处理还可以显著提高土壤pH值、有机碳、全氮、全磷、全钾、有效磷、碱解氮和速效钾等养分,长期增施有机肥后土壤磷素累积明显,而NPK处理则加速了土壤酸化。各施肥处理均可以显著提高玉米产量(P<0.05),较CK比增加了1.04~15.07倍。综上,有机无机配施(NPKM)是提升土壤养分、微生物生物量、酶活性和产量的最佳培肥措施。
[35]
柳夏艳, 曹浩轩, 缪闯和, 等. 长期施用堆肥处理下潮土剖面水溶性有机物的三维荧光光谱研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2023, 43(3):674-684.
[36]
陈丽铭, 吴月颖, 李财生, 等. 土壤溶解性有机质分子特征对不同来源有机肥分解的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(4):1101-1112.
[37]
GARCIA J, MONDRAGON-BECERRA M, MARTINEZ I, et al. Organic amendments alter urban soil microbiomes and improve crop quality[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2024, 204:105731.
PDF(2897 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/