PDF(1480 KB)
Simulation Model of Growth Stages of Myrica rubra in Protected Cultivation Based on Meteorological Factors
JIANDan, WUJianxin, ZHAORui, JINYang
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5) : 92-100.
PDF(1480 KB)
PDF(1480 KB)
Simulation Model of Growth Stages of Myrica rubra in Protected Cultivation Based on Meteorological Factors
The simulation of the growth stages of Myrica rubra in protected cultivation is a key aspect in understanding the interaction between the growth of the plant and environmental factors. To explore the impact of the microclimate in protected cultivation on the growth stages of Myrica rubra and accurately predict the evolution of these stages, this study utilized growth and development data of Myrica rubra from 2022 to 2024 in Lanxi of Zhejiang, along with concurrent meteorological data on light, temperature, and other factors. Three methods were employed for the growth stage simulation: growing degree day (GDD), physiological development time (PDT), and the clock model. The models were validated based on their performance. The results indicated that the clock model exhibited higher predictive accuracy and adaptability in simulating the various growth stages of Myrica rubra, particularly during the reddening stage and maturity stages, where the prediction errors were significantly smaller compared to GDD and PDT methods. The root mean square errors (RMSE) for the wintering, flowering, fruit setting, reddening stage, and maturity stages in the clock model were 2.83 d, 3.32 d, 4.24 d, 2.38 d, and 2.16 d, respectively. The normalized root mean square errors (nRMSE) were 0.47, 1.11, 0.47, 0.48, and 0.54, respectively. These results demonstrate that the clock model provides a more accurate reflection of the growth stage evolution of Myrica rubra, offering scientific support for optimizing cultivation management strategies. This can effectively promote the implementation of refined management practices, improving both management efficiency and effectiveness. In the future, the parameters of wintering period can be optimized and extended to multi-variety and multi-region applications.
Myrica rubra / protected cultivation / growth stage simulation model / temperature-light effect / biological characteristics
| [1] |
陈方永. 我国杨梅研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012, 41(5):31-36.
|
| [2] |
吴昌旺, 程慧斌, 林明明, 等. 浙南山区杨梅大棚促早栽培技术研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2021, 50(3):4.
|
| [3] |
江云珠, 姚佳蓉, 姜遥, 等. 浙江省杨梅设施栽培主要模式及效益分析[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2022(4):69-73.
|
| [4] |
郑丕尧主编. 作物生理学导论[M]. 北京: 农业大学出版社, 1992
|
| [5] |
Global food security for the increasing world population not only requires increased sustainable production of food but a significant reduction in pre- and post-harvest waste. The timing of when a fruit is harvested is critical for reducing waste along the supply chain and increasing fruit quality for consumers. The early in-field assessment of fruit ripeness and prediction of the harvest date and yield by non-destructive technologies have the potential to revolutionize farming practices and enable the consumer to eat the tastiest and freshest fruit possible. A variety of non-destructive techniques have been applied to estimate the ripeness or maturity but not all of them are applicable for in situ (field or glasshouse) assessment. This review focuses on the non-destructive methods which are promising for, or have already been applied to, the pre-harvest in-field measurements including colorimetry, visible imaging, spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging. Machine learning and regression models used in assessing ripeness are also discussed.
|
| [6] |
朱学玲, 徐延红, 张素霞. 基于生长度日的牡丹物候期预测研究[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2024, 47(3):55-61.
|
| [7] |
杨再强, 孙擎, 李永秀, 等. CN201410479377.X,一种基于温光的设施杨梅果实生长模拟方法[P]. 江苏,2016-06-15.
|
| [8] |
蔡淑芳, 吴宝意, 廖水兰, 等. 基于光温效应的温室小白菜生理指标动态模拟[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(9):2191-2198.
|
| [9] |
李威, 柳军, 刘阳, 等. 基于气象因子的设施番茄果实生长模拟模型[J]. 中国农业气象, 2024, 45(12):1487-1495.
|
| [10] |
苏李君, 刘云鹤, 王全九. 基于有效积温的中国水稻生长模型的构建[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1):13.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
岳延滨, 冯恩英, 黎瑞君, 等. 基于生理发育时间的火龙果周年生育期模拟[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(12):140-145.
|
| [13] |
董蕊. 宁夏地区日光温室黄瓜生长模型研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
程陈, 黎贞发, 董朝阳, 等. 日光温室黄瓜和芹菜不同位置消光系数模拟及验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(21):243-252.
|
| [17] |
陈先冠, 冯利平, 白慧卿, 等. 小麦模型算法集成平台构建与算法比较[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(6):237-249.
|
| [18] |
牛宁, 景博, 刘其, 等. 温室樱桃番茄生育期模拟模型的研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(3):318-325.
|
| [19] |
陈潇, 冯利平, 彭明喜, 等. 钟模型法建立甘蔗发育期模拟模型[J]. 中国农业气象, 2019, 40(3):186-194.
|
| [20] |
赵辰, 孙彬彬, 周国华, 等. 福建龙海杨梅生态地质适生模型研究与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5):9.
|
| [21] |
李化龙, 陈端生, 尚小宁. 农业设施环境中光、热、湿、CO2浓度等要素调控及应用技术研究进展[J]. 农业工程技术·温室园艺, 2006(4):9-11.
|
| [22] |
姜兴东, 赵慧宇, 马迪, 等. 浙江省杨梅果实品质发展现状探析[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2023(4):20-25.
|
| [23] |
郭文场, 刘佳贺, 李悦. 中国杨梅栽培管理与利用(2)[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2016, 19(11):47-48.
|
| [24] |
黄海静, 符国槐, 杨再强, 等. 设施栽培对杨梅生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(6):47-52.
以‘丁岙’杨梅(Myrica rubra Sieb.cv.‘Dingao’)为试材,分别于2010年和2011年1—6月间,在浙江温州开展设施大棚和露地杨梅观测试验,研究设施栽培对杨梅生长发育和果实品质的影响。结果表明:观测期间,杨梅塑料大棚内日均气温、日均空气相对湿度、气温日较差和大于10 ℃的有效积温较棚外分别高30 ℃、12 %、67 ℃和2375 ℃〖DK〗·d;设施杨梅单果质量、果实可溶性固形物、糖、Vc含量及可食率分别比露地栽培杨梅提高了386 %、111 %、83 %、566 %和97 %,有机酸含量减少了115 %,每6667 m2果实产量提高了177 %;同时设施杨梅较露地提早成熟,杨梅果实直径与累计温光效应(APTE)较好地符合Logistic方程。利用逐步回归分析,建立了杨梅品质与气象因子的回归方程,相关分析结果显示:日均气温、气温日较差和大于10 ℃的有效积温与果实可溶性固形物、含糖量、Vc含量、酸含量及单果质量的相关性显著;最高、最低气温及日平均空气相对湿度与果实可溶性固形物、Vc含量和单果质量显著相关。因此,设施大棚具有增温、保湿作用,可有效调节小气候条件,显著缩短杨梅果实发育进程和改善果实品质。
|
| [25] |
曹卫星, 罗卫红. 作物系统模拟及智能管理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
|
| [26] |
刘福昊. 设施番茄生长发育模型构建及软件开发研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
傅元本, 江进发, 王跃春. 杨梅栽培新技术[J]. 江西园艺, 2003(1):3.
|
| [29] |
黄一华. 东魁杨梅品种特性及高产优质栽培技术[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012, 41(6):2.
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
温永菁, 李春, 董朝阳, 等. 钟模型在日光温室番茄发育进程模拟中的适应性探讨[J]. 中国农业气象, 2020, 41(10):622-631.
|
| [33] |
程陈, 董朝阳, 郑生宏, 等. 光温因子驱动的园艺作物叶龄模型模拟精度比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6):1368-1378.
为了提高光温因子驱动的园艺作物通用性叶龄模拟模型的模拟精度,以黄瓜、芹菜、菠菜、小香芹、郁金香和茶叶为供试材料,进行了7年(2016—2022年)的分期播种试验,依据作物生长发育与关键气象因子(辐射和温度)的关系,采用4类建模方法(温差法、积温法、生理发育时间法和辐热积法)构建了园艺作物叶龄模拟模型,并以6种方式(平均值、最值均值、中值、逐步回归、BP神经网络和Elman神经网络)和2种集成逻辑(直接和分步)集成模拟结果,最终优化模型模拟精度。结果表明:1)2种集成逻辑下模型模拟精度均较高,且分步集成逻辑优于直接集成逻辑,平均绝对误差(mean absolute error, MAE)差值为0.31 d,平均相对误差(mean relative error, MRE)差值为0.33%,均方根误差(root mean square error, RMSE)差值为0.40 d,归一化均方根误差(normalized root mean square error, NRMSE)差值为0.46%;2)2种集成逻辑下模型最优时间尺度为逐时尺度,最优作物类型为茶叶,最优建模方法为Elman神经网络集成模拟模型。研究结果可为园艺作物智慧生产管理和可视化提供理论依据和技术支撑。
|
| [34] |
马玉平, 王培娟, 王达, 等. 作物发育模式重构及基于甘蔗的模拟检验[J]. 应用气象学报, 2021, 32(5):603-617.
|
| [35] |
付永硕, 李昕熹, 周轩成, 等. 全球变化背景下的植物物候模型研究进展与展望[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2020, 50(9):13.
|
| [36] |
钟乐, 曾燕, 邱新法, 等. 浙江省杨梅种植适宜性区划[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2023, 35(2):236-244.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |