PDF(1265 KB)
Effects of Forchlorfenuron and Brassinolide on Fruit Quality and Occurrence of Soft Rot in ‘Taishan No.1’ Kiwifruit
LIAihua, FENGShuaishuai, QIAOFeng, ZHANGJinchao, JIANGTingting, JIEWeidong, YANGZong, HANWei, LIQuanxi, ANMengmeng, LIUTian, TANDeyun
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 9-13.
PDF(1265 KB)
PDF(1265 KB)
Effects of Forchlorfenuron and Brassinolide on Fruit Quality and Occurrence of Soft Rot in ‘Taishan No.1’ Kiwifruit
The paper aims to mitigate the adverse impacts of long-term and excessive use of forchlorfenuron (CPPU) on the kiwifruit industry. This experiment was conducted with 6-year-old ‘Taishan No.1’ kiwifruit as the test material to investigate the effects of reduced CPPU combined with brassinolide (BR) on the yield, fruit quality and storage performance of kiwifruit. Five treatments were set up, including young fruits soaked with 5 mg/L CPPU combined with 0.075, 0.15 and 0.3 mg/L BR, with clear water as the blank control and 10 mg/L CPPU solution as the reagent control. Fruits at physiological maturity were collected to determine the indicators including single fruit weight, firmness, titratable acid and soluble solids content, and the incidence of soft rot during fruit storage was statistically analyzed. The results showed that reduced CPPU combined with an appropriate concentration of BR could maintain a high yield of kiwifruit, and among them, the combination of 5 mg/L CPPU and 0.15 mg/L BR had significant effects in reducing the core cavity rate and malformed fruit rate, increasing the fruit soluble solids content and decreasing the incidence of soft rot during fruit storage. It is concluded that the combination of 5 mg/L CPPU and 0.15 mg/L BR is the optimal combination for improving the fruit quality and enhancing the storage resistance of ‘Taishan No.1’ kiwifruit.
| [1] |
齐秀娟, 王然, 张敏, 等. 猕猴桃育种研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2024, 41(11):2160-2172.
|
| [2] |
王玮. CPPU处理对采后猕猴桃品质及贮藏性的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2016:1-48.
|
| [3] |
李大卫, 黄文俊, 钟彩虹. 中国猕猴桃产业现状及“十五五”发展建议[J]. 果树学报, 2024, 41(11):2149-2159.
|
| [4] |
崔玉玉, 金光春. 山东淄博博山猕猴桃产业发展现状与对策建议[J]. 中国果树, 2024, 10(10):143-150.
|
| [5] |
马筱. 农产品区域公用品牌推动乡村产业振兴研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学,2025:1-72.
|
| [6] |
李瑞奇, 曹庆, 王秋红, 等. 氯吡脲和28-高芸苔素内酯混用对猕猴桃树的增产调节作用[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(15):49-50.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
王艳玲. 减量膨大剂搭配不同植物生长调节剂对红心猕猴桃品质及产量的影响[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学,2023:1-69.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
刘焕, 周会玲, 王甜, 等. 膨大剂在猕猴桃上的应用分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2018, 64(2):71-75.
|
| [12] |
袁林, 巴合提古丽·乌拉力别克, 王海珍, 等. 2个软枣猕猴桃品种果实生长发育规律及品质特征研究[J]. 果树资源学报, 2025, 6(5):50-56.
|
| [13] |
蔡莉, 侯再忠, 吴崇文, 等. 3种生物肥对贵长猕猴桃果实品质及软腐病发生率的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2025, 5(7):22-28.
|
| [14] |
陈双双, 钟嵘, 黄春辉, 等. 不同浓度氯吡脲对‘东红’猕猴桃果实品质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44(3):549-559.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
解鑫. 氯吡脲对猕猴桃果实发育期及贮藏期营养物质变化的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院,2023:1-70.
|
| [17] |
刘兴华, 郭井泉, 罗安伟, 等. 果实膨大剂对陕西省猕猴桃产业负效应的调查分析[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2004, 10(1):30-32.
|
| [18] |
王宪爽, 赵小明, 徐爽, 等. 壳寡糖减少膨大剂用量改善猕猴桃品质的效果[J]. 农产品加工, 2025, 5(1):5-9.
|
| [19] |
刘金娜. 6-酮螺甾型油菜素甾醇类植物激素构效关系及其对猕猴桃产量和贮藏品质的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2021:1-146.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
何胜娟, 赵雯, 王亚国, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂处理对‘瑞玉’猕猴桃果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2026, 35(1):73-82.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
王靖, 宋佳奕, 何小娥, 等. 猕猴桃软腐病防治研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2025, 10(18):50-55.
|
| [24] |
王丽, 周贝贝, 侯珲, 等. 猕猴桃软腐病病原菌鉴定及杀菌剂的防治效果[J]. 果树学报, 2025, 42(12):2930-2939.
|
| [25] |
车翔婷, 杨梅, 潘万和, 等. 不同处理方式对猕猴桃果实品质影响的研究进展[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2024, 5(18):137-140.
|
| [26] |
郭琳琳, 罗静, 庞荣丽, 等. CPPU处理猕猴桃常温贮藏过程中果实糖含量相关基因的表达分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(1):40-45.
为了解析采前CPPU处理的猕猴桃果实贮藏性与未处理果实的差异及相关的分子调控机制,以清水为对照,评价了盛花后用20 mg/L CPPU处理果实在常温贮藏下可溶性固形物、可滴定酸及可溶性糖含量的变化,并用转录组分析鉴定出与可溶性糖变化相关的候选基因。结果表明,无论处理还是对照,可溶性糖含量在贮藏过程中呈逐渐上升趋势,但CPPU处理果实的可溶性糖含量始终低于对照果实。转录组分析表明,CPPU处理抑制了淀粉和蔗糖代谢中的基因Achn087691(编码磷酸己糖异构酶)以及果糖和甘露糖代谢中基因Achn203191(编码磷酸丙糖异构酶)的表达,并促进淀粉和蔗糖代谢中基因Achn069851(编码己糖激酶)前期表达,但对基因Achn161931(编码尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶)、基因Achn206141(编码尿苷二磷酸-葡萄糖醛酸酯-4-表异构酶)和基因Achn295291(编码果胶甲酯酶)表现为前期抑制、中期促进、后期抑制。由此推测,20 mg/L CPPU处理明显影响了徐香猕猴桃果实中可溶性糖含量及糖代谢相关基因的表达,致使果实常温贮藏过程中可溶性固形物和可溶性糖含量降低,且提前软化。
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |