Time domain migration velocity modeling method based on deep learning

ShuangQi YUAN

Prog Geophy ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 2686-2697.

PDF(12292 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(12292 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 2686-2697. DOI: 10.6038/pg2025II0353

Time domain migration velocity modeling method based on deep learning

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Residual Curvature Analysis (RCA) based on common image point gathers(offset domain) can significantly improve the accuracy of migration velocity modeling and Pre-Stack Time Migration (PSTM). By picking up the points with the maximum energy in the spectrum data, one can achieve a new time domain migration velocity. However, the traditional methods for instance: migration velocity modeling based on manual picking of γ spectrum, or migration velocity analyzing based on Human-Computer Interaction etc. Which are very labor-intensive and time-consuming. To help address this concern, we proposed a kind of migration velocity modeling method based on deep learning. First, A series of random γ values are applied to the target velocity model, and after performing PSTM, then common image point gathers are obtained. Second, based on common image point gathers, we can calculate corresponded γ spectrum through γ scanning, which can be taken as the sample data-set and input γ can be used as label data. In terms of constructing a γ value prediction network, we implement a neural network based on the architectures of U-Net3+, and we chose Mish as the activation function, and we chose Log_Cosh as the misfit function. We can train the network using data-sets above, and corrected migration velocity model can be predicted though inferring input γ spectrum. Method test based on Marmousi model has verified the correctness of the method proposed in this paper. And a large amount of field data processing results show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accuracy velocity model than manual picking, while its efficiency is dozens of times higher than manual picking, which turns out our method has great potential in industrial application.Although certain achievements have been made in this paper, continuous efforts are still required in terms of the generalization of the neural network model, the pre-processing of CRP gather data, and the completeness of the data-set.

Key words

Residual Curvature Analysis (RCA) / Migration velocity modeling / Deep learning / U-Net3+ network

Cite this article

Download Citations
ShuangQi YUAN. Time domain migration velocity modeling method based on deep learning[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2025, 40(6): 2686-2697 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2025II0353

References

Araya-Polo M , Jennings J , Adler A , et al. Deep-learning tomography. The Leading Edge, 2018, 37 (1): 58- 66.
Cai Z Y , Ge Z X . Using artificial intelligence to pick P-wave first-arrival of the microseisms: taking the aftershock sequence of Wenchuan earthquake as an example. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55 (3): 451- 460.
Chen D W , Yang W Y , Wei X J , et al. Research on first-break automatic picking based on an improved U-Net network. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36 (4): 1493- 1503.
Cho S , Pyun S , Choi B , et al. Prediction of S-wave velocity models from surface waves using deep learning. Near Surface Geophysics, 2024, 22 (3): 281- 297.
Geng Z C , Zhao Z Y , Shi Y Z , et al. Deep learning for velocity model building with common-image gather volumes. Geophysical Journal International, 2021, 228 (2): 1054- 1070.
Han M L , Zou Z H , Ma R . Deep learning-driven velocity modeling based on seismic reflection data and multi-scale training sets. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56 (5): 935- 946.
Huang H M, Lin L F, Tong R F, et al. 2020. U-net 3+: a full-scale connected U-net for medical image segmentation. //Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Barcelona: IEEE, 1055-1059, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053405.
Li S C , Liu B , Ren Y X , et al. Deep-learning inversion of seismic data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58 (3): 2135- 2149.
Lu J M , Wang Y G . The Principle of Seismic Exploration. 3rd ed Beijing: China University of Petroleum Press, 2009
Misra D. 2019. Mish: a self regularized non-monotonic neural activation function. arXiv: 1908.08681, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1908.08681.
Muller A P O , Bom C R , Costa J C , et al. Deep-Tomography: iterative velocity model building with deep learning. Geophysical Journal International, 2023, 232 (2): 975- 989.
Nath S K , Chakraborty S , Singh S K , et al. Velocity inversion in cross-hole seismic tomography by counter-propagation neural network, genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming techniques. Geophysical Journal International, 1999, 138 (1): 108- 124.
Pan H X , Fang W B . Review of seismic velocity analysis methods. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2006, 29 (5): 305- 311. 305-311, 332
Pan H X , Geng W F , Cui J H , et al. Deep learning method for intelligent picking of seismic velocity spectrum. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38 (6): 2553- 2564.
Ronneberger O , Fischer P , Brox T . U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. //Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Munich: Springer, 2015, 234- 241.
Röth G , Tarantola A . Neural networks and inversion of seismic data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1994, 99 (B4): 6753- 6768.
Song H , Mao W J , Tang H H . Application of deep neural networks for multiples attenuation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64 (8): 2795- 2808.
Tang J , Han S Y , Liu Y C , et al. Seismic surface wave attenuation based on denoising convolutional neural networks. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61 (2): 245- 252.
Wang H T , Zhang J S , Zhao Z X , et al. Automatic velocity picking using a multi-information fusion deep semantic segmentation network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5918310
Wu Y , Lin Y Z . InversionNet: an efficient and accurate data-driven full waveform inversion. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 2020, 6: 419- 433.
Yang F S , Ma J W . Deep-learning inversion: a next-generation seismic velocity model building method. Geophysics, 2019, 84 (4): R583- R599.
Zhang B , Wang H Z , Sun C L , et al. Realization of time-domain residual curvature migration velocity analysis in iCluster software platform. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010, 33 (3): 168- 173.
Zhang B . Automatic seismic interval velocity building based on convolutional neural network and velocity spectrum. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60 (3): 366- 375.
Zhang H , Zhu P M , Gu Y , et al. Velocity auto-picking from seismic velocity spectra based on deep learning. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019, 58 (5): 724- 733.
Zhu S X , Meng F K , Jiang T . Research on deep learning-based automatic pickup algorithm for seismic stacked velocity spectra. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2024, 67 (3): 1223- 1236.
振宇 , 增喜 . 人工智能在拾取地震P波初至中的应用——以汶川地震余震序列为例. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55 (3): 451- 460.
德武 , 午阳 , 新建 , 等. 一种基于改进的U-Net网络的初至自动拾取研究. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36 (4): 1493- 1503.
明亮 , 志辉 , . 利用反射地震资料和多尺度训练集的深度学习速度建模. 石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56 (5): 935- 946.
基孟 , 永刚 . 地震勘探原理. 3版 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2009
海侠 , 伟峰 , 家豪 , 等. 面向地震速度谱智能拾取的深度学习方法. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38 (6): 2553- 2564.
宏勋 , 伍宝 . 地震速度分析方法综述. 勘探地球物理进展, 2006, 29 (5): 305- 311. 305-311, 332
, 伟建 , 欢欢 . 基于深层神经网络压制多次波. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64 (8): 2795- 2808.
, 盛元 , 英昌 , 等. 基于去噪卷积神经网络的面波噪声压制方法. 石油物探, 2022, 61 (2): 245- 252.
, 华忠 , 成龙 , 等. 时间域剩余曲率偏移速度分析技术在iCluster软件中的实现. 勘探地球物理进展, 2010, 33 (3): 168- 173.
. 基于卷积神经网络和叠加速度谱的地震层速度自动建模方法. 石油物探, 2021, 60 (3): 366- 375.
, 培民 , , 等. 基于深度学习的地震速度谱自动拾取方法. 石油物探, 2019, 58 (5): 724- 733.
四新 , 凡可 , . 基于深度学习的地震叠加速度谱自动拾取算法研究. 地球物理学报, 2024, 67 (3): 1223- 1236.

感谢中石化石油物探技术研究院有限公司以及国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金重大项目“高精度地震导向钻井关键技术及软件”对本文完成提供的支持与帮助,感谢评审专家对本文提出的宝贵意见.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2025 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(12292 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/