Application of electrical resistivity imaging in the sediments detection of shallow river and lake

Kui SUO, MingDong ZHAO, Lei FANG, WenHui LIU, ShiZhong CHEN, ShaoKang LIU, MengHan JIA, GuiZhang ZHAO

Prog Geophy ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 2160-2171.

PDF(7886 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(7886 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 2160-2171. DOI: 10.6038/pg2025II0373

Application of electrical resistivity imaging in the sediments detection of shallow river and lake

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI), a geophysical method based on resistivity contrasts between different media and their sensitivity to water, has become a vital tool for investigating subsurface structures in shallow aquatic environments such as rivers and lakes. Known for its non-invasive nature, environmental friendliness, and high-resolution imaging capabilities, ERI is particularly effective in mapping sediment layers and subsurface strata. However, the complexity of aquatic environments, influenced by factors such as water depth, resistivity, flow velocity, and sediment properties, poses significant challenges in obtaining high-resolution data. To address these challenges, this study explores the performance of ERI in two distinct aquatic settings: the Xinbian River, an artificial river in Suzhou, and the Qingshui Lake, a small inland lake in Yinchuan. This study established five ERI profiles using both suspended and floating electrode configurations. Key prior information, including water depth and resistivity, was integrated as constraints during the inversion process to enhance the accuracy of the resistivity distributions. The results delineated detailed spatial distributions of water, sediment layers, and subsurface formations. In the Xinbian River, the upstream section exhibited a relatively uniform depth with thicker sediment layers and a higher groundwater level compared to the downstream section. The downstream area, significantly affected by seasonal flooding, showed increased riverbed scouring, resulting in thinner sediment layers and a groundwater level approximately 1 meter lower than upstream. In Qingshui Lake, the maximum water depth reached 6 meters, with minimal bottom undulation and an average sediment thickness of about 1 meter. The sediments primarily consisted of clay layers, acting as aquicludes, with a distinct lens body identified in the western region. The underlying sand layer exhibited high water content but showed no significant groundwater activity. The findings underscore the effectiveness of ERI in resolving fine-scale sedimentary and subsurface structural features in shallow aquatic environments. The method excels in identifying sediment thickness, fine-grained lithological distributions, and their physical properties, offering high-resolution imaging without the need for invasive techniques such as drilling. The incorporation of prior information as inversion constraints significantly improves reliability while reducing uncertainties. This study demonstrates the broad applicability of ERI in investigating shallow rivers, lakes, and other aquatic systems, providing critical technical support for pollution monitoring, groundwater research, and hydrogeological and ecological restoration efforts. Future research could focus on optimizing electrode configurations and developing advanced inversion algorithms to further improve the resolution and reliability of ERI in complex aquatic environments.

Key words

Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) / Shallow waters / Sediments / Constrained inversion / Surface water-groundwater conversion

Cite this article

Download Citations
Kui SUO , MingDong ZHAO , Lei FANG , et al . Application of electrical resistivity imaging in the sediments detection of shallow river and lake[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2025, 40(5): 2160-2171 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2025II0373

References

Bartole R, Lodolo E, Obrist-Farner J, et al. Sedimentary architecture, structural setting, and Late Cenozoic depocentre migration of an asymmetric transtensional basin: Lake Izabal, eastern Guatemala. Tectonophysics, 2019, 750: 419- 433.
Colombero C, Comina C, Gianotti F, et al. Waterborne and on-land electrical surveys to suggest the geological evolution of a glacial lake in NW Italy. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2014, 105: 191- 202.
Dahlin T, Loke M H. Underwater ERT surveying in water with resistivity layering with example of application to site investigation for a rock tunnel in central Stockholm. Near Surface Geophysics, 2018, 16(3): 230- 237.
Dara R, Kettridge N, Rivett M O, et al. Identification of floodplain and riverbed sediment heterogeneity in a meandering UK lowland stream by ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2019, 171: 103863
Eleftherakis D, Amiri-Simkooei A, Snellen M, et al. Improving riverbed sediment classification using backscatter and depth residual features of multi-beam echo-sounder systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 131(5): 3710- 3725.
Feng D S, Yang B K, Dai Q W, et al. The simulation and inversion for the full-four-pole array of Ultra-High density resistivity method. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(2): 718- 724.
Gao J, Zhang H J, Qin Z. Study of 2.5D full channel adjoint electrical resistivity tomography for different observation configurations. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31(6): 2534- 2540.
Harvey J, Gooseff M. River corridor science: Hydrologic exchange and ecological consequences from bedforms to basins. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(9): 6893- 6922.
Hoppenbrock J, Bücker M, Gallistl J, et al. Evaluation of lake sediment thickness from water-borne electrical resistivity tomography data. Sensors, 2021, 21(23): 8053
Li G C, Zhu P M, Zhang T. Application of high density resistivity method to the exploration of fault along the river. Yellow River, 2017, 39(5): 109- 111.
Loke M H, Chambers J E, Rucker D F, et al. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 95: 135- 156.
Maurya P K, Christensen F E, Kass M A, et al. Technical note: efficient imaging of hydrological units below lakes and fjords with a floating, transient electromagnetic (FloaTEM) system. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2022, 26(11): 2813- 2827.
McLachlan P, Chambers J, Uhlemann S, et al. Limitations and considerations for electrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging of riverbed sediments: observations from laboratory, field, and synthetic experiments. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2020, 183: 104173
Ni L, Chen D H, Xu H W, et al. Electrical exploration on water region used in the geophysical prospecting cross the river and lake. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(6): 2710- 2715.
Nyquist J E, Freyer P A, Toran L. Stream bottom resistivity tomography to map ground water discharge. Groundwater, 2008, 46(4): 561- 569.
Orlando L. Some considerations on electrical resistivity imaging for characterization of waterbed sediments. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 95: 77- 89.
Schrottke K, Becker M, Bartholomä A, et al. Fluid mud dynamics in the Weser estuary turbidity zone tracked by high-resolution side-scan sonar and parametric sub-bottom profiler. Geo-Marine Letters, 2006, 26(3): 185- 198.
Simyrdanis K, Papadopoulos N, Kim J H, et al. Archaeological investigations in the shallow seawater environment with electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 2015, 13(6): 601- 611.
Suo K, Liu W H, Ni Y P, et al. Application of three-dimensional resistivity imaging in small landslide detection. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 43(6): 71- 78. 71-78, 95
Wang S L, Liu C P. Over-water geophysical scheme study of some Yangtze River bridges. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2016, 13(4): 546- 552.
Weit A, Mourier B, Fretaud T, et al. Combined usage of geophysical methods in continental water bodies, their benefits and challenging issues: a special focus on sediment deposits in dam reservoirs. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2023, 213: 105036
Wunderlich T, Fischer P, Wilken D. Constraining electric resistivity tomography by direct push electric conductivity logs and vibracores: an exemplary study of the Fiume Morto silted riverbed (Ostia Antica, western Italy). Geophysics, 2018, 83(3): B87- B103.
Yang L, Jin W J, Shang Y J. Effects on the resolution of high-density electrical method by electrodes array deploying. Progress in Geophysics, 2019, 34(1): 406- 411.
Yun Z, Wang R, Fu C M, et al. Response analysis of marine DC resistivity electrical sounding with different configurations. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38(2): 928- 939.
德山, 炳坤, 前伟, 等. 超高密度电法全四极装置正反演. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(2): 718- 724.
, 海江, . 不同观测方式下基于伴随矩阵的2.5D全通道电阻率反演研究. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(6): 2534- 2540.
广超, 培民, . 高密度电法在花岗岩地区跨河流探测中的应用. 人民黄河, 2017, 39(5): 109- 111.
, 大红, 华文, 等. 水域电法在江、湖穿越工程中应用. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(6): 2710- 2715.
, 文辉, 云鹏, 等. 三维电阻率成像在小型滑坡探测中的应用. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(6): 71- 78. 71-78, 95
双六, 长平. 拟建长江大桥桥址区水上物探方案研究. 工程地球物理学报, 2016, 13(4): 546- 552.
, 维浚, 彦军. 电极布置方式对高密度电法探测分辨率的影响. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(1): 406- 411.
, , 长民, 等. 海洋直流电阻率法电测深装置响应分析. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38(2): 928- 939.

本文数据采集过程得到了中国地质调查局南京地质调查中心和宁夏回族自治区水文环境地质调查院的支持,在此表示感谢.感谢审稿专家的修改意见,使本文质量得到显著提升.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2025 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(7886 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/