Research progress on data preprocessing methods for geophysical multi-information fusion

Xin WU, GuoQiang XUE, YanBo WANG, Song CUI, JinJing SHI

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1) : 143-155.

PDF(3175 KB)
image
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Online first  /  Current issue  /  All issues  /  Top access  /  RSS
PDF(3175 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1) : 143-155. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026II0426

Research progress on data preprocessing methods for geophysical multi-information fusion

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Multimodal information fusion technology is an emerging field that has flourished in recent years, representing the application of artificial intelligence theories and technologies in information analysis and processing. It plays a crucial role in various domains, such as battlefield situational awareness, industrial robotics, remote medical care, and autonomous driving. With the rapid development of geophysical exploration theories and technologies, particularly with the significant advancements in China's airborne and satellite-based Earth observation technologies in recent years, the massive data generated poses a severe challenge to the traditional analysis models, which are primarily based on human experience. There is an increasing demand to introduce multi-information fusion technology into the field of geosciences, especially in the domain of geophysical exploration data. However, due to the differences in methods, scenarios, and equipment in geophysical observations, the data obtained have varying spatial distribution standards, making subsequent information fusion calculations difficult. Therefore, it is necessary to preprocess the observational data according to a unified standard to ensure that the data have consistent observational density. Currently, both the theory and technology for voxel-based preprocessing of observational data, which is crucial for multi-information fusion, are lacking. In some studies, traditional prediction techniques have been used to perform quasi-three-dimensional (or quasi-voxel-based) data standardization, but the effectiveness of these approaches is still under evaluation. Therefore, this paper reviews the existing data standardization preprocessing methods from the perspective of geophysical multi-information fusion methods. It introduces a semi-airborne electromagnetic observation case to discuss the performance of various existing methods, providing a methodological basis for further developing and refining the geophysical multi-information fusion processing technology system.

Key words

Multimodal information fusion / Data prediction method / Voxel-ization

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
Xin WU , GuoQiang XUE , YanBo WANG , et al . Research progress on data preprocessing methods for geophysical multi-information fusion[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(1): 143-155 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026II0426

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
Appleby G, Liu L F, Liu L P. 2020. Kriging convolutional networks. //Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New York: AAAI, 3187-3194, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5716.
Cited in this article [1]
Bárdossy A . Introduction to geostatistics. Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 1997, 28- 32.
Cited in this article [1]
Bokareva T, Hu W, Kanhere S, et al. 2006. Wireless sensor networks for battlefield surveillance. //Proceedings of the Land Warfare Conference 2006. Brisbane, 1-8.
Cited in this article [1]
Buhmann M D . Radial basis functions. Acta Numerica, 2000, 9: 1- 38.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900000015
Cited in this article [1]
Calcagno P , Chilès J P , Courrioux G , et al. Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2008, 171 (1-4): 147- 157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013
Cited in this article [1]
Caumon G , Gray G , Antoine C , et al. Three-dimensional implicit stratigraphic model building from remote sensing data on tetrahedral meshes: theory and application to a regional model of La Popa Basin, NE Mexico. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51 (3): 1613- 1621.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2207727
Cited in this article [1]
Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1810.04805.
Cited in this article [1]
Di Q Y , Yang C C , Zhu R X . Key technology development of deep resources exploration and field experimentation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences , 2012, 27 (3): 389- 394.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2012.03.019
Diffo S , Lemotio W , Mezoue Adiang C , et al. Contribution of the artificial neural network (ANN) method to the interpolation of the Bouguer gravity anomalies in the region of Lom-Pangar (East-Cameroon). Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2022, 8 (1): 32
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-022-00341-1
Cited in this article [1]
Dou F F , Lin Z Y , Ye Z H . Study of 3D visualization of discrete data based on GOCAD. Acta Geologica Sichuan , 2017, 37 (1): 159- 163.
Drews F, Feng D, Faion F, et al. 2022. DeepFusion: A robust and modular 3D object detector for lidars, cameras and radars. //2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Kyoto: IEEE, 560-567, doi: 10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981778.
Cited in this article [1]
Elman J L . Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 1990, 14 (2): 179- 211.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
Cited in this article [1]
Frank T , Tertois A L , Mallet J L . 3D-reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly distributed and noisy point data. Computers & Geosciences, 2007, 33 (7): 932- 943.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.11.014
Cited in this article [1]
Goodfellow I J, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. //Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Montreal: MIT Press, 2672-2680.
Cited in this article [1]
Goovaerts P . Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 228 (1-2): 113- 129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X
Cited in this article [1]
Guo J T , Wu L X , Zhou W H , et al. Section-constrained local geological interface dynamic updating method based on the HRBF surface. Journal of Structural Geology, 2018, 107: 64- 72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.11.017
Cited in this article [1]
Hall D L , Llinas J . An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1997, 85 (1): 6- 23.
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.554205
Cited in this article [1]
He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q, et al. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. //Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas: IEEE, 770-778.
Cited in this article [1]
Hillier M , Wellmann F , Brodaric B , et al. Three-dimensional structural geological modeling using graph neural networks. Mathematical Geosciences, 2021, 53 (8): 1725- 1749.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09945-x
Cited in this article [1]
Hillier M , Wellmann F , de Kemp E A , et al. GeoINR 1.0: an implicit neural network approach to three-dimensional geological modelling. Geoscientific Model Development, 2023, 16 (23): 6987- 7012.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023
Cited in this article [1]
Hillier M J , Schetselaar E M , de Kemp E A , et al. Three-dimensional modelling of geological surfaces using generalized interpolation with radial basis functions. Mathematical Geosciences, 2014, 46 (8): 931- 953.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9540-3
Cited in this article [1]
Hochreiter S , Schmidhuber J . Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 1997, 9 (8): 1735- 1780.
https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Cited in this article [1]
Houlding S W . 3D Geoscience Modeling: Computer Techniques for Geological Characterization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1994
Cited in this article [1]
Irakarama M , Laurent G , Renaudeau J , et al. Finite difference implicit structural modeling of geological structures. Mathematical Geosciences, 2021, 53 (5): 785- 808.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09887-w
Cited in this article [1]
Journel A G , Huijbregts C J . Mining Geostatistics. London: Academic Press, 1978
Cited in this article [1]
Kitanidis P K . Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997
Cited in this article [1]
Lam N S N . Spatial interpolation methods: a review. The American Cartographer, 1983, 10 (2): 129- 150.
https://doi.org/10.1559/152304083783914958
Cited in this article [1]
Lejeune Dirichlet G . über die Reduction der positiven quadratischen Formen mit drei unbestimmten ganzen Zahlen. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 1850, 1850 (40): 209- 227.
Cited in this article [1]
Li B , Liu H , Li Y M . 3-D seismic data discrete smooth interpolation using conjugate gradient. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , 2002, 45 (5): 691- 699.
Li F. 2015. Study on the technology of spatial data interpolation method of mine transient electromagnetic (in Chinese). Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology.
Li F, Zheng Q, Wang M, et al. 2016. Current status and development trends of multi-source geological information fusion technology in mineral exploration. //Proceedings of the 2016 China Earth Science Joint Academic Annual Conference (in Chinese). Beijing, 545.
Li J, Shen Y Y, Chen L, et al. 2023a. Rainfall spatial interpolation with graph neural networks. //28th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Tianjin: Springer, 175-191, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-30678-5_14.
Cited in this article [1]
Li J , Shen Y Y , Chen L , et al. SSIN: Self-supervised learning for rainfall spatial interpolation. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 2023b, 1 (2): 176
https://doi.org/10.1145/3589321
Cited in this article [1]
Li X, Shi B T, Hou Y N, et al. 2022. Homogeneous multi-modal feature fusion and interaction for 3D object detection. //17th European Conference on Computer Vision. Tel Aviv: Springer, 691-707, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-19839-7_40.
Cited in this article [2]
Li Z Y , Tao H , Zhao D , et al. Three-dimensional empirical Bayesian Kriging for soil PAHs interpolation considering the vertical soil lithology. Catena, 2022, 212: 106098
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106098
Liu X Q , Su Y J , Hu T Y , et al. Neural network guided interpolation for mapping canopy height of China's forests by integrating GEDI and ICESat-2 data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2022, 269: 112844
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112844
Cited in this article [1]
Liu Z Y. 2016. Research on surface interpolation algorithm in geological modeling (in Chinese). Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology.
Lu G Y , Wong D W . An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Computers & Geosciences, 2008, 34 (9): 1044- 1055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010
Cited in this article [1]
Ma J , Ding Y X , Gan V J L , et al. Spatiotemporal prediction of PM2.5 concentrations at different time granularities using IDW-BLSTM. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 107897- 107907.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932445
Cited in this article [1]
Macêdo I , Gois J P , Velho L . Hermite radial basis functions implicits. Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, 30 (1): 27- 42.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01785.x
Cited in this article [1]
Mallet J L . Discrete smooth interpolation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 1989, 8 (2): 121- 144.
https://doi.org/10.1145/62054.62057
Cited in this article [1]
Mallet J L . Discrete smooth interpolation in geometric modelling. Computer-Aided Design, 1992, 24 (4): 178- 191.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(92)90054-E
Cited in this article [1]
Mallet J L . Discrete modeling for natural objects. Mathematical Geology, 1997, 29 (2): 199- 219.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769628
Cited in this article [1]
Matheron G . Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 1963, 58 (8): 1246- 1266.
https://doi.org/10.211-3/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
Cited in this article [1]
Meng T , Jing X Y , Yan Z , et al. A survey on machine learning for data fusion. Information Fusion, 2020, 57: 115- 129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.001
Cited in this article [1]
Meng X H , Hou J Q , Liang H Y , et al. The fast realization of discrete smooth interpolation in the interpolation of potential data. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration , 2002, 26 (4): 302- 306.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8918.2002.04.015
Merwade V M , Maidment D R , Goff J A . Anisotropic considerations while interpolating river channel bathymetry. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 331 (3-4): 731- 741.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.018
Cited in this article [1]
Muzammal M , Talat R , Sodhro A H , et al. A multi-sensor data fusion enabled ensemble approach for medical data from body sensor networks. Information Fusion, 2020, 53: 155- 164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.021
Cited in this article [1]
Oliver M A , Webster R . Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1990, 4 (3): 313- 332.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799008941549
Cited in this article [1]
Radford A, Narasimhan K, Salimans T, et al. 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training.
Cited in this article [1]
Radford A , Wu J , Child R , et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 2019, 1 (8): 9
Cited in this article [1]
Rosenblatt F . The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 1958, 65 (6): 386- 408.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519
Cited in this article [1]
Shepard D. 1968. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. //Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference. New York: ACM, 517-524, doi: 10.1145/800186.810616.
Cited in this article [1]
Sibson R. 1981. A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation. //Barnett V ed. Interpreting Multivariate Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 21-36.
Cited in this article [1]
Tertois A, Koren Z. 2020. Solving problems with the discrete smooth interpolation framework, from geomodelling to geophysics and beyond. //First EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition. Vienna: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1-5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.202032041.
Cited in this article [1]
Tomczak M . Spatial interpolation and its uncertainty using automated anisotropic inverse distance weighting (IDW)-cross-validation/jackknife approach. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 1998, 2 (2): 18- 30.
Cited in this article [1]
Vance T C , Huang T , Butler K A . Big data in Earth science: Emerging practice and promise. Science, 2024, 383 (6688): eadh9607
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh9607
Cited in this article [1]
Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. 2017. Attention is all you need. //Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates Inc., 6000-6010.
Cited in this article [1]
Velasco-Hernandez G, Yeong D J, Barry J, et al. 2020. Autonomous driving architectures, perception and data fusion: A review. //2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP). Cluj-Napoca: IEEE, 315-321, doi: 10.1109/ICCP51029.2020.9266268.
Cited in this article [1]
Voronoi G . Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Deuxième mémoire. Recherches sur les parallélloèdres primitifs. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1908, 134: 198- 287.
Cited in this article [1]
Wang S H , Li Y M , Yin H , et al. Improvement of GeoSMA-3D program based on multi-constrained DSI algorithm. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science) , 2023, 44 (2): 251- 257.
https://doi.org/10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2023.02.013
Wang T. 2013. Research on 3D interpolation approaches based on Kriging with anisotropic spatial structures (in Chinese). Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University.
Wang X L , Guo J T , Fu S H , et al. Towards automatic and rapid 3D geological modelling of urban sedimentary strata from a large amount of borehole data using a parallel solution of implicit equations. Earth Science Informatics, 2024, 17 (1): 421- 440.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01164-8
Cited in this article [1]
Wang Z H , Chen J , Hoi S C H . Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021, 43 (10): 3365- 3387.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2982166
Cited in this article [1]
West D B . Introduction to Graph Theory. 2nd ed Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2001
Cited in this article [1]
Wu X , Xue G Q , Chen W Y , et al. Research on key technologies of the low-noise system for Semi-airborne electromagnetic method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , 2023, 66 (9): 3904- 3913.
https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2023Q0891
Wu Y K, Zhuang D Y, Labbe A, et al. 2021. Inductive graph neural networks for spatiotemporal Kriging. //Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Virtually: AAAI, 4478-4485, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16575.
Cited in this article [1]
Wu Z C , Guo F S , Lin Z Y , et al. Technology and method of multi-data merging in 3D geological modeling. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition) , 2016, 46 (6): 1895- 1913.
https://doi.org/10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606308
Xia H S , Liu Z S , Efremochkina M , et al. Study on city digital twin technologies for sustainable smart city design: A review and bibliometric analysis of geographic information system and building information modeling integration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 84: 104009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104009
Cited in this article [1]
Xu D Y , Wang D , Li J H , et al. The security connotation and index system of industry chain and supply chain of strategic mineral resources under the new development pattern. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences) , 2023, 57 (1): 1- 12.
Xue G Q , Chen W , Cheng J L , et al. A review of electrical and electromagnetic methods for coal mine exploration in China. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 177332- 177341.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951774
Cited in this article [1]
Xue G Q , Li H , Chen W Y , et al. Progress of transient electromagnetic detection technology for water-bearing bodies in coal mines. Journal of China Coal Society , 2021, 46 (1): 77- 85.
Yan J B , Wu B , He Q H . An anisotropic IDW interpolation method with multiple parameters cooperative optimization. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica , 2021, 50 (5): 675- 684.
https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200148
Yang Y , Jia M Y . 3D spatial interpolation of soil heavy metals by combining Kriging with depth function trend model. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 461: 132571
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132571
Cited in this article [1]
Yao L Q , Pan M , Cheng Q M , et al. Nested overlap of variograms in 3D Kriging. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences) , 2009, 34 (2): 294- 298.
https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2009.030
Zeng Q D , Di Q Y , Xue G Q , et al. Modern science and technology in metallogenic and prospecting model studies. Earth Science Frontiers , 2021, 28 (3): 295- 308.
https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.1.3
Zhang J. 2012. Kring-based geophysical data mesh of three-dimensional space (in Chinese). Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing).
Zhang M M , Li X H , Yuan F , et al. Comparative study between three-dimensional strata modeling and surface model interpolation. Geology of Anhui , 2015, 25 (3): 182- 186.
Zhang Z Q , Wang G W , Carranza E J M , et al. An integrated machine learning framework with uncertainty quantification for three-dimensional lithological modeling from multi-source geophysical data and drilling data. Engineering Geology, 2023, 324: 107255
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107255
Cited in this article [1]
Zhang Z W , Cui P , Zhu W W . Deep learning on graphs: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 34 (1): 249- 270.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.2981333
Cited in this article [1]
Zheng S J, Meng X H, Wang J, et al. 2019. Potential field data discrete smooth interpolation using conjugate gradient. //International Workshop on Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Methods and Their Applications. Xi'an, China: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 85-88, doi: 10.1190/GEM2019-022.1.
Cited in this article [1]
Zheng Y . Methodologies for cross-domain data fusion: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2015, 1 (1): 16- 34.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2015.2465959
Cited in this article [1]
Zhu D , Cheng X M , Zhang F , et al. Spatial interpolation using conditional generative adversarial neural networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2020, 34 (4): 735- 758.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1599122
Cited in this article [1]
底 青云 , 杨 长春 , 朱 日祥 . 深部资源探测核心技术研发与应用. 中国科学院院刊, 2012, 27 (3): 389- 394.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2012.03.019
Cited in this article [1]
窦 帆帆 , 林 子瑜 , 叶 子华 . 基于GOCAD的离散点云数据三维可视化研究. 四川地质学报, 2017, 37 (1): 159- 163.
Cited in this article [1]
李 冰 , 刘 洪 , 李 幼铭 . 三维地震数据离散光滑插值的共轭梯度法. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45 (5): 691- 699.
Cited in this article [1]
李飞. 2015. 矿井瞬变电磁空间数据体插值方法技术研究. 徐州: 中国矿业大学.
Cited in this article [1]
李芳, 郑强, 王明, 等. 2016. 多源地学信息融合技术在矿产勘查中的研究现状及发展趋势. //2016中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集. 北京, 545.
Cited in this article [1]
刘智勇. 2016. 曲面插值算法在三维地质建模中的研究. 成都: 成都理工大学.
Cited in this article [1]
孟 小红 , 侯 建全 , 梁 宏英 , 等. 离散光滑插值方法在地球物理位场中的快速实现. 物探与化探, 2002, 26 (4): 302- 306.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8918.2002.04.015
Cited in this article [1]
王 述红 , 李 友明 , 尹 宏 , 等. 基于多约束DSI算法的GeoSMA-3D程序改进. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 44 (2): 251- 257.
https://doi.org/10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2023.02.013
Cited in this article [1]
王亭. 2013. 顾及各向异性的三维Kriging空间插值方法研究. 南京: 南京师范大学.
Cited in this article [1]
武 欣 , 薛 国强 , 陈 卫营 , 等. 半航空电磁法全流程低噪声关键技术研究. 地球物理学报, 2023, 66 (9): 3904- 3913.
https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2023Q0891
Cited in this article [1]
吴 志春 , 郭 福生 , 林 子瑜 , 等. 三维地质建模中的多源数据融合技术与方法. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46 (6): 1895- 1913.
https://doi.org/10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606308
Cited in this article [1]
徐 德义 , 王 迪 , 李 军辉 , 等. 新发展格局下战略性矿产资源产业链供应链安全内涵及指标体系研究. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 57 (1): 1- 12.
Cited in this article [1]
薛 国强 , 李 海 , 陈 卫营 , 等. 煤矿含水体瞬变电磁探测技术研究进展. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46 (1): 77- 85.
Cited in this article [1]
颜 金彪 , 吴 波 , 何 清华 . 顾及各向异性的多参数协同优化IDW插值方法. 测绘学报, 2021, 50 (5): 675- 684.
https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200148
Cited in this article [1]
姚 凌青 , 潘 懋 , 成 秋明 , 等. 三维Kriging方法中的变异函数套合. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2009, 34 (2): 294- 298.
Cited in this article [1]
曾 庆栋 , 底 青云 , 薛 国强 , 等. 成矿模式与找矿模式研究的现代科学技术. 地学前缘, 2021, 28 (3): 295- 308.
https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.1.3
Cited in this article [1]
张隽. 2012. 基于克里金方法的地球物理三维空间数据网格化. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京).
Cited in this article [1]
张 明明 , 李 晓晖 , 袁 峰 , 等. 地层三维建模及面模型插值方法对比研究. 安徽地质, 2015, 25 (3): 182- 186.
Cited in this article [1]

感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持！

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(3175 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉