Distributed helical optical fiber das seismic acquisition system: a comparative test with geophones

JunGuang NIE, DeBao XU, YuHui YAO, XiaoLiang HONG

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1) : 428-441.

PDF(1593 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(1593 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1) : 428-441. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026II0539

Distributed helical optical fiber das seismic acquisition system: a comparative test with geophones

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) technology leverages the linear response of Rayleigh backscattered light in optical fibers to external acoustic fields, enabling distributed sensing and collection of vibrations. This technology has seen extensive application in seismic exploration. However, conventional straight optical fibers exhibit sensitivity primarily along the fiber axis, limiting their effectiveness in detecting vertically incident seismic waves, thus constraining their use in surface seismic surveys. To address this limitation, a Helically Wound Cable-Based Distributed Acoustic Sensing (HWC-DAS) technique has been proposed. In this approach, the fiber is helically wrapped around a deformable elastic medium, improving directional sensitivity and enhancing its ability to detect vertically incident reflections, significantly boosting sensitivity. Nevertheless, systematic comparisons between HWC-DAS and traditional seismic geophones remain sparse, and the differences in their sensitivity, Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and frequency-dependent responses are not yet clearly understood. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted controlled laboratory experiments, including shaking table and vibration-sensing tests, to systematically compare the performance of HWC-DAS with conventional seismic geophones. Results from shaking table experiments indicate that HWC-DAS exhibits vibration response capabilities comparable to those of geophones across various frequency bands. Furthermore, vibration-sensing tests demonstrated that HWC-DAS achieves higher sensitivity and improved SNR compared to single-point geophones. Our study validates the effectiveness and feasibility of HWC-DAS for seismic exploration through laboratory experimentation, laying foundational groundwork for its practical deployment in industry.

Key words

Distributed acoustic sensing / Helical wound cable / Geophone / Vibration test

Cite this article

Download Citations
JunGuang NIE , DeBao XU , YuHui YAO , et al. Distributed helical optical fiber das seismic acquisition system: a comparative test with geophones[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(1): 428-441 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026II0539

References

Bakulin A, Silvestrov I, Pevzner R. 2019. Surface seismic with DAS changes land acquisition. //SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Manama, Bahrain: SPE, doi: 10.2118/194950-MS.
Cao D P , J J , Sun S R , et al. Three-component signal acquisition mechanism of distributed acoustic sensing based on helically winding fiber-optic. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61 (1): 60- 69.
Chen J F , Li H , Xiao X P , et al. Fully distributed fiber-optic streamer with small channel spacing for marine seismic acquisition. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 294: 116852
Daley T M , Freifeld B M , Ajo-Franklin J , et al. Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge, 2013, 32 (6): 699- 706.
Daley T M , Miller D E , Dodds K , et al. Field testing of modular borehole monitoring with simultaneous distributed acoustic sensing and geophone vertical seismic profiles at Citronelle, Alabama. Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 64 (5): 1318- 1334.
Freifeld B M, Pevzner R, Dou S, et al. 2016. The CO2CRC Otway Project deployment of a distributed acoustic sensing network coupled with permanent rotary sources. //78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. Online: EAGE, 1-5.
Gou L , Zhang S H , Yu G , et al. Optical fiber geophysics: development status and future prospects. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61 (1): 15- 31.
Hartog A , Frignet B , Mackie D , et al. Vertical seismic optical profiling on wireline logging cable. Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 62 (4): 693- 701.
Hornman J C . Field trial of seismic recording using distributed acoustic sensing with broadside sensitive fibre-optic cables. Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 65 (1): 35- 46.
Hornman K, Kuvshinov B, Zwartjes P, et al. 2013. Field trial of a broadside-sensitive distributed acoustic sensing cable for surface seismic. //75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013. London: EAGE, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130383.
Innanen K, Eaid M. 2018. Towards discrimination of elastic wave modes with shaped DAS Fibre-optic cables. //80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Copenhagen, Denmark: EAGE, 1-5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201801628.
Innanen K A. 2017a. Parameterization of a helical DAS fibre wound about an arbitrarily curved cable axis. //79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Paris, France: EAGE, 1-5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201701202.
Innanen K A. 2017b. Determination of seismic-tensor strain from Helical Wound Cable-Distributed Acoustic Sensing cable with arbitrary and nested-helix winds. //2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Houston, Texas: SEG, 926-930.
Innanen K A, Lawton D, Hall K, et al. 2019. Design and deployment of a prototype multicomponent Distributed Acoustic Sensing loop array. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. San Antonio, Texas, USA: SEG, 953-957, doi: 10.1190/segam2019-3216304.1.
Jiang T, Zhan G, Hance T, et al. 2016. Valhall dual-well 3D DAS VSP field trial and imaging for active wells. //2016 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Dallas, Texas: SEG, 5582-5586.
Kimura T, Suzuki K, Ali S, et al. 2018. Hybrid 3D VSP using fiber-optic technology and a conventional borehole seismic array tool. //80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Copenhagen, Denmark: EAGE, 1-5.
Kuvshinov B N . Interaction of helically wound fibre-optic cables with plane seismic waves. Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 64 (3): 671- 688.
La Follett J, Wyker B, Hemink G, et al. 2014. Evaluation of fiber-optic cables for use in distributed acoustic sensing: Commercially available cables and novel cable designs. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014. SEG, 5009-5013, doi: 10.1190/segam2014-0297.1.
Lesnikov V, Allanic C. 2014. DAS VSP acquisition-perspectives and challenges. //76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition-Workshops. Amsterdam, Netherlands: EAGE.
Li Y, Wu H, Wong W, et al. 2015. Velocity analysis and update with 3D DAS-VSP to improve borehole/surface seismic images. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015. SEG, 5285-5289.
Li Y P. 2019. Application of DAS systems in oilfield exploration. //Symposium on Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology in Energy Exploration and Development (in Chinese).
Li Y P , Li F , Li J G , et al. Application of distributed acoustic sensing in borehole seismic exploration. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59 (2): 242- 249.
Lumens P, Franzen A, Hornman K, et al. 2013. Cable development for distributed geophysical sensing with a field trial in surface seismic. //Proceedings Volume 8794, 5th European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors. Krakow, Poland: SPIE, 497-501, doi: 10.1117/12.2025693.
Madsen K N , Thompson M , Parker T , et al. A VSP field trial using distributed acoustic sensing in a producing well in the North Sea. First Break, 2013, 31 (11): 51- 56.
Parker T , Shatalin S , Farhadiroushan M . Distributed Acoustic Sensing—a new tool for seismic applications. First Break, 2014, 32 (2): 61- 69.
Poletto F, Finfer D, Corubolo P. 2015. Broadside wavefields in horizontal helically-wound optical fiber and hydrophone streamer. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015. SEG, 95-99, doi: 10.1190/segam2015-5896445.1.
Ringstad C, Røed M H, Jestin C, et al. 2020. A multi-fibre optic sensing system for cross-well monitoring at the Svelvik CO2 field lab. //First EAGE Workshop on Fibre Optic Sensing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: EAGE, 1-5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.202030039.
Sun Q Z , Fan C Z , Li H , et al. Progress of research on optical fiber distributed acoustic sensing technology in petroleum industry. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61 (1): 50- 59. 50-59, 77
Wang Z Y , Liu Y F , Chen Y C , et al. Research and application progress of distributed fiber-optic hydrophone technology. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44 (1): 0106004
Yao Y , Wang Y B , Wang W J , et al. Micro-vibration response characteristics of distributed acoustic sensing. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2023, 66 (2): 713- 730.
Yavuz S, Freifeld B M, Pevzner R, et al. 2016. Subsurface imaging using buried DAS and geophone arrays—Preliminary results from CO2CRC Otway Project. //78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. Online: EAGE, 1-5, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601497.
Zhang H , Q T , Zhang Y , et al. Recent advances in geoscience using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) and Distrusted Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and the road ahead. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38 (3): 1416- 1454.
Zhang Z P, Deng B, Fan G D, et al. 2024. Discussion on directional sensitivity of DAS in surface seismic exploration. //Proceedings of the 2nd China Petroleum Geophysical Annual Conference (Vol. 1) (in Chinese). Wuhan: Sinopec Geophysical Corporation Jianghan Branch, 226-229, doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2024.001606.
丹平 , 军军 , 上饶 , 等. 基于螺旋缠绕光纤的分布式声波传感三分量信号采集机理研究. 石油物探, 2022, 61 (1): 60- 69.
, 少华 , , 等. 光纤地球物理技术的发展现状与展望. 石油物探, 2022, 61 (1): 15- 31.
李彦鹏. 2019. DAS系统在油田勘探领域的应用. //光纤传感技术在能源勘探开发领域应用研讨会.
彦鹏 , , 建国 , 等. DAS技术在井中地震勘探的应用. 石油物探, 2020, 59 (2): 242- 249.
琪真 , 存政 , , 等. 光纤分布式声波传感技术在石油行业的研究进展. 石油物探, 2022, 61 (1): 50- 59. 50-59, 77
照勇 , 依凡 , 义赐 , 等. 分布式光纤水听器技术研究和应用进展. 光学学报, 2024, 44 (1): 0106004
, 一博 , 伟君 , 等. 分布式光纤声波传感微振动响应特征. 地球物理学报, 2023, 66 (2): 713- 730.
, 庆田 , , 等. 光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)和分布式声波传感器(DAS)在地学中的应用进展及发展方向. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38 (3): 1416- 1454.
张忠坡, 邓搏, 范国栋, 等. 2024. DAS在地面地震勘探中的方向性敏感问题探讨. //中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 第二届中国石油物探学术年会论文集(上册). 武汉: 中石化石油工程地球物理有限公司江汉分公司, 226-229, doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2024.001606.

感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(1593 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/