Operational assessment and performance evaluation of the shakealert earthquake early warning system

JiaNan ZHANG, JinDong SONG, Qiang MA, HeYi LIU, ShanYou LI

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 522-539.

PDF(4637 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(4637 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 522-539. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026JJ0144

Operational assessment and performance evaluation of the shakealert earthquake early warning system

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Earthquake early warning systems are one of the effective means to mitigate earthquake disasters. In recent years, frequent earthquakes have caused enormous losses to human lives and property, making it extremely urgent to build a safe and reliable earthquake early warning system. The ShakeAlert system is an earthquake early warning system on the United States. West Coast. Since its official launch in 2019, it has now been updated to version 3.0. The monitoring network of the ShakeAlert system includes 1, 400 seismic stations, 1, 100 GNSS stations, as well as the MEMS, DAS, and BSM sensor networks under research. Its main algorithms consist of three seismic source algorithms: EPIC, FinDer, and GFAST-PGD, along with the Solution Aggregator (SA) module, Decision Module (DM), and ground motion estimation module (Eqinfo2GM). The operational process of ShakeAlert is closely linked: the data layer captures and transmits raw data, the production layer conducts collaborative analysis through multiple algorithms, and the alert layer conducts final review for release and dynamic updates, forming an efficient closed loop from perception to early warning. This paper studies its performance from the three dimensions of timeliness, accuracy, and reliability. The system can issue the first alert within 4 to 20 seconds in areas with dense stations, and successfully warned 41 out of 53 earthquakes with magnitude M≥4.5 from 2019 to 2023. However, the ShakeAlert system still has problems such as high system complexity, insufficient station distribution, shortcomings in algorithm performance, difficulty in identifying intensity anomaly zones, and failure of the public's scientific risk avoidance behaviors. As an internationally leading early warning system, ShakeAlert has important reference value for its technical experiences such as multi-source monitoring integration and dynamic algorithm weighting. In the future, China can improve the accuracy and social effectiveness of its earthquake early warning system by densifying stations in weak areas, optimizing algorithm fusion mechanisms, and strengthening public education.

Key words

United States / ShakeAlert / Earthquake detection / Early warning system

Cite this article

Download Citations
JiaNan ZHANG , JinDong SONG , Qiang MA , et al . Operational assessment and performance evaluation of the shakealert earthquake early warning system[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(2): 522-539 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026JJ0144

References

Allen R M , Gasparini P , Kamigaichi O , et al. The status of earthquake early warning around the world: An introductory overview. Seismological Research Letters, 2009, 80 (5): 682- 693.
Atkinson G M , Boore D M . Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011, 101 (3): 1121- 1135.
Boore D M , Atkinson G M . Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24 (1): 99- 138.
Böse M , Heaton T H , Hauksson E . Real-time Finite Fault Rupture Detector (FinDer) for large earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 191 (2): 803- 812.
Böse M , Felizardo C , Heaton T H . Finite-fault rupture detector (FinDer): Going real-time in Californian ShakeAlert warning system. Seismological Research Letters, 2015, 86 (6): 1692- 1704.
Böse M , Smith D E , Felizardo C , et al. FinDer v.2: Improved real-time ground-motion predictions for M2-M9 with seismic finite-source characterization. Geophysical Journal International, 2018, 212 (1): 725- 742.
Böse M , Andrews J , O'Rourke C , et al. Testing the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system using synthesized earthquake sequences. Seismological Research Letters, 2023, 94 (1): 243- 259.
Brooks B A , Protti M , Ericksen T , et al. Robust earthquake early warning at a fraction of the cost: ASTUTI costa Rica. AGU Advances, 2021, 2 (3): e2021AV000407
Brown H M , Allen R M , Hellweg M , et al. Development of the ElarmS methodology for earthquake early warning: Realtime application in California and offline testing in Japan. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31 (2): 188- 200.
Chiou B S J , Youngs R R . An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24 (1): 173- 215.
Chung A I , Meier M A , Andrews J , et al. ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system performance during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2020, 110 (4): 1904- 1923.
Clements T . Earthquake detection with tinyML. Seismological Research Letters, 2023, 94 (4): 2030- 2039.
Cochran E S , Kohler M D , Given D D , et al. Earthquake early warning ShakeAlert system: testing and certification platform. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89 (1): 108- 117.
Cochran E S , Bunn J , Minson S E , et al. Event detection performance of the PLUM earthquake early warning algorithm in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2019, 109 (4): 1524- 1541.
Crayne J , Herrán C , Sumy D F , et al. Public education about ShakeAlert earthquake early warning: evaluation of an animated video in English and Spanish. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. Communication and Public Engagement, 2024, 14 (2): 232- 256.
Crowell B W , Schmidt D A , Bodin P , et al. Demonstration of the Cascadia G-FAST geodetic earthquake early warning system for the Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 2016, 87 (4): 930- 943.
de Groot R M, Sumy D F, McBride S K, et al. 2022. ShakeAlert: A people-focused earthquake early warning system. //12th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Dybing S N. 2024. Improving earthquake rapid response and early warning performance with geodesy and machine learning[Ph. D. thesis]. Eugene: University of Oregon.
Farghal N , Barbour A , Langbein J . The potential of using dynamic strains in earthquake early warning applications. Seismological Research Letters, 2020, 91 (5): 2817- 2827.
Farghal N S , Saunders J K , Parker G A . The potential of using fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) in earthquake early warning applications. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2022, 112 (3): 1416- 1435.
Friberg P, Lisowski S, Dricker I, et al. 2010. Earthworm in the 21st century. //EGU General Assembly. EGU.
Ghahari F , Sargsyan K , Parker G A , et al. Performance-based earthquake early warning for tall buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 2024, 40 (2): 1425- 1451.
Given D D, Allen R M, Sundstrom A S B, et al. 2018. Revised technical implementation plan for the ShakeAlert system—An earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey, doi: 10.3133/ofr20181155.
Goltz J D. 2023. Social science contributions to earthquake warnings: Commemorating the work of Dennis S. Mileti. Natural Hazards Review, 24(2): 03123003, doi: 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1697.
Goltz J D , Wald D J , McBride S K , et al. The Ojai California Earthquake of 20 August 2023: Earthquake early warning performance and alert recipient response in the MW5.1 event. Seismological Research Letters, 2024, 95 (5): 2745- 2760.
Gou Y C , Allen R M , Zhu W Q , et al. Leveraging submarine DAS arrays for offshore earthquake early warning: A case study in Monterey Bay, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2025, 115 (2): 516- 532.
Hirakawa E , Parker G A , Baltay A , et al. Rupture directivity of the 25 October 2022 MW5.1 Alum Rock Earthquake. The Seismic Record, 2023, 3 (2): 144- 155.
Horiuchi S , Negishi H , Abe K , et al. An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005, 95 (2): 708- 718.
Kodera Y , Yamada Y , Hirano K , et al. The propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM) method: A simple and robust seismic wavefield estimation approach for earthquake early warning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2018, 108 (2): 983- 1003.
Kohler M D , Cochran E S , Given D , et al. Earthquake early warning ShakeAlert system: West coast wide production prototype. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89 (1): 99- 107.
Kohler M D , Smith D E , Andrews J , et al. Earthquake early warning ShakeAlert 2.0: Public rollout. Seismological Research Letters, 2020, 91 (3): 1763- 1775.
Kuyuk H S , Allen R M , Brown H , et al. Designing a network-based earthquake early warning algorithm for California: ElarmS-2. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2014, 104 (1): 162- 173.
Li T L , Jiang P , Ma K X , et al. Analysis of early warning processing capability and efficiency for the Lushan M6.1 Earthquake on June 1, 2022. Earthquake Research in China, 2024a, 40 (3): 586- 601.
Li T L , Jiang P , Li P P , et al. Analysis of the earthquake early warning of the Luding M6.8 earthquake on September 5, 2022. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2024b, 19 (2): 397- 409.
Lian J X , Liao W Y , Lee E J , et al. Integration of Machine learning and equal differential time method for enhanced hypocenter localization in earthquake early warning systems: application to dense seismic arrays in Taiwan. Earth Planets Space, 2024, 76 (1): 94
Liu H Y , Song J D , Li S Y . Development of ShakeAlert 2.0 earthquake early warning system in the United States. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 2021, 52 (6): 634- 646.
Lou J S , Tian J Y . Review on seismic strain-wave observation based on high-resolution borehole strainmeters. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37 (1): 51- 58.
Lux A I , Smith D , Böse M , et al. Status and performance of the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system: 2019-2023. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2024, 114 (6): 3041- 3062.
S , Fang L H , Ren H Y , et al. Overview of the earthquake monitoring status in the United States. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2024, 46 (2): 431- 448.
Ma R , Zhang W X , Tang H , et al. Implications of the emergency response to the Yinchuan M4.8 and M4.6 earthquakes by the Yinchuan earthquake monitoring central station. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2025, 41 (2): 68- 75.
McBride S K , Smith H , Morgoch M , et al. Evidence-based guidelines for protective actions and earthquake early warning systems. Geophysics, 2022, 87 (1): WA77- WA102.
McBride S K, De Groot R M. 2023. Social science and ShakeAlert, the earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States. //Basin and Range Summit 2022. Salt Lake City, Utah, 7-11.
McGuire J J, Smith D E, Frankel A D, et al. 2021. Expected warning times from the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system for earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.
McGuire J J , Ulberg C W , Lux A I , et al. ShakeAlert Version 3: Expected performance in large earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2025a, 115 (2): 533- 561.
McGuire J J , Barbour A J , Stewart C , et al. The GorDAS distributed acoustic sensing experiment above the Cascadia locked zone and Subducted Gorda Slab. Seismological Research Letters, 2025b, 96 (4): 2489- 2503.
Meier M A . How "good" are real-time ground motion predictions from Earthquake Early Warning systems?. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, 122 (7): 5561- 5577.
Minson S E , Meier M A , Baltay A S , et al. The limits of earthquake early warning: Timeliness of ground motion estimates. Science Advances, 2018, 4 (3): eaaq0504
Murray J R , Crowell B W , Murray M H , et al. Incorporation of real-time earthquake magnitudes estimated via peak ground displacement scaling in the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2023, 113 (3): 1286- 1310.
Nakayachi K , Yokoi R , Goltz J . Human behavioral response to earthquake early warnings (EEW): Are alerts received on mobile phones inhibiting protective actions?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 105: 104401
Ouyang L B , Su Z J , Liu J , et al. construction of decision-making platform fused in China earthquake early warning network. Earthquake Research in China, 2024, 40 (1): 24- 39.
Patel S C , Allen R M . The MyShake App: User experience of early warning delivery and earthquake shaking. Seismological Research Letters, 2022, 93 (6): 3324- 3336.
Sun J X , Yu S H , Xie X F , et al. Review and reflection on the emergency response of the Yongning M4.8 and Jinfeng M4.6 earthquake in Yinchuan. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2025, 41 (2): 82- 87.
Thakoor K , Andrews J , Hauksson E , et al. From earthquake source parameters to ground-motion warnings near you: The ShakeAlert earthquake information to ground-motion (eqInfo2GM) method. Seismological Research Letters, 2019, 90 (3): 1243- 1257.
Trugman D T , Page M T , Minson S E , et al. Peak ground displacement saturates exactly when expected: Implications for earthquake early warning. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2019, 124 (5): 4642- 4653.
Williams E F , Fernández-Ruiz M R , Magalhaes R , et al. Distributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers. Nature Communications, 2019, 10 (1): 5778
Williamson A , Lux A , Allen R . Improving out of network earthquake locations using prior seismicity for use in earthquake early warning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2023, 113 (2): 664- 675.
Xu J J , Yang Z G , Han G J , et al. Emergency production and preliminary analysis of source parameters of the M6.8 earthquake on January 7, 2025 in Dingri, Xizang. Earthquake Research in China, 2025, 41 (1): 154- 166.
Zhang J Y , Xi N , Xu T R , et al. The center technology platform for national earthquake intensity quick reporting and early warning. Earthquake Research in China, 2024, 40 (1): 54- 68.
Zhao G Y , Qiu L , Li C H , et al. Applicability analysis of improved STA/LTA algorithm for MEMS seismograph. Progress in Geophysics, 2025, 40 (2): 448- 459.
孟潭 . 从定日6.8级地震灾害审视地震预警盲区与认知误区. 防灾博览, 2025, (1): 4- 11.
同林 , , 康熙 , 等. 2022年6月1日芦山6.1级地震预警处理能力及效能分析. 中国地震, 2024a, 40 (3): 586- 601.
同林 , , 萍萍 , 等. 2022年9月5日泸定M6.8地震预警分析. 震灾防御技术, 2024b, 19 (2): 397- 409.
赫奕 , 晋东 , 山有 . 美国ShakeAlert地震预警系统2.0版本的发展. 地球与行星物理论评, 2021, 52 (6): 634- 646.
家墅 , 家勇 . 基于高分辨率钻孔应变仪的地震应变波观测研究进展. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37 (1): 51- 58.
, 立华 , 华育 , 等. 美国地震监测现状综述. 地震工程学报, 2024, 46 (2): 431- 448.
, 山有 , , 等. 地震预警是如何实现的. 防灾博览, 2023, (1): 2- 9.
, 文鑫 , , 等. 银川地震监测中心站2025年M4.8、M4.6地震应急响应启示. 防灾减灾学报, 2025, 41 (2): 68- 75.
欧阳 龙斌 , 柱金 , , 等. 国家地震烈度速报与预警工程融合决策平台建设. 中国地震, 2024, 40 (1): 24- 39.
嘉欣 , 思汗 , 晓峰 , 等. 2025年银川永宁4.8级、金凤4.6级地震应急处置回顾与思考. 防灾减灾学报, 2025, 41 (2): 82- 87.
佳静 , 志高 , 光洁 , 等. 2025年1月7日西藏定日6.8级地震应急产品产出及震源参数初步分析. 中国地震, 2025, 41 (1): 154- 166.
伟恒 , 施文 , 水龙 . 四川泸定M6.8级地震预警结果分析研究. 科技与创新, 2024, (19): 145- 148.
建勇 , , 泰然 , 等. 国家中心地震烈度速报与预警技术平台. 中国地震, 2024, 40 (1): 54- 68.
国勇 , , 彩华 , 等. 面向MEMS强震仪的改进STA/LTA算法适用性分析. 地球物理学进展, 2025, 40 (2): 448- 459.

感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(4637 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/