Progress in the application of deep learning in magnetotelluric inversion

YuHang LI, Chong ZHANG, JiaYong YAN

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 604-616.

PDF(2606 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(2606 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 604-616. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026JJ0172

Progress in the application of deep learning in magnetotelluric inversion

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Magnetotelluric (MT) inversion is a key technology for exploration underground electrical structures. However, conventional methods such as the Gauss-Newton method and Occam method are limited by high computational complexity, sensitivity to initial models, and strong non-uniqueness. In recent years, deep learning has significantly improved the efficiency and accuracy of inversion through end-to-end nonlinear mapping, multimodal data fusion, and noise enhancement strategies. This paper systematically reviews the core progress of deep learning in MT inversion: Firstly, it reviews five traditional MT inversion methods, including the Gauss-Newton method, quasi-Newton method, Occam method, conjugate gradient method, and nonlinear conjugate gradient method. These conventional MT inversion methods face problems such as high computational resource requirements, significant sensitivity to initial models, and strong non-uniqueness. Then, in response to these difficulties, this paper mainly reviews the application of deep learning methods such as MT2DInv-Unet and MT-MitNet in MT inversion. MT2DInv-Unet avoids the dependence on initial models through end-to-end nonlinear mapping, reduces the risk of falling into local optimal solutions, and thus alleviates the problems of initial model sensitivity and strong non-uniqueness; MT-MitNet accelerates forward modeling, significantly shortening the forward calculation time and effectively reducing computational complexity. The application of deep learning methods effectively improves the predicament of traditional inversion methods. Finally, in the face of challenges such as scarce measured data, non-Gaussian noise interference, and three-dimensional anisotropic modeling in complex geological scenarios, this paper combines the advantages of deep learning methods and proposes targeted suggestions for optimizing MT inversion.

Key words

Magnetotelluric method / Inversion / Deep learning / Forward modeling / Multimodal data fusion / Noise robustness

Cite this article

Download Citations
YuHang LI , Chong ZHANG , JiaYong YAN. Progress in the application of deep learning in magnetotelluric inversion[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(2): 604-616 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026JJ0172

References

Amaya M , Morten J P , Boman L . A low-rank approximation for large-scale 3D controlled-source electromagnetic Gauss-Newton inversion. Geophysics, 2016, 81 (3): E211- E225.
Cao X Y , Yin C C , Zhang B , et al. 3D magnetotelluric inversions with unstructured finite-element and limited-memory quasi-Newton methods. Applied Geophysics, 2018, 15 (3): 556- 565.
Chen X B. 2003. New forward and inversion algorithms and a visual integrated system for MT data[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing: Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.
Chen X B , Q T , Zhang K . Review of magnetotelluric data inversion methods. Progress in Geophysics, 2011, 26 (5): 1607- 1619.
Constable S C , Parker R L , Constable C G . Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics, 1987, 52 (3): 289- 300.
Constable S C , Orange A S , Hoversten G M , et al. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration—Part 1: A sea-floor equipment system. Geophysics, 1998, 63 (3): 816- 825.
Deng F , Hu J , Wang X B , et al. Magnetotelluric deep learning forward modeling and its application in inversion. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15 (14): 3667
Gu G W , Li T L . Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion with surface topography based on the vector finite element method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63 (6): 2449- 2465.
Habashy T M , Abubakar A . A general framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2004, 46: 265- 312.
He Z X . Opportunities, challenges and development directions of electromagnetic exploration today. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 41 (4): 433- 447.
Hou Y W . OCCAM inversion for detecting overlying multiple electrical layers above deep coal seams by TEM. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46 (6): 169- 173.
Hu Z Z , Hu X Y , He Z X . Pseudo-Three-Dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using nonlinear conjugate gradients. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2006, 49 (4): 1226- 1234.
Kang M , Hu X Y , Kang J , et al. Compared of magnetotelluric 2D inversion methods. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32 (2): 476- 486.
Kelbert A , Meqbel N , Egbert G D , et al. ModEM: A modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data. Computers & Geosciences, 2014, 66: 40- 53.
Khan A , Lowther D A . Physics informed neural networks for electromagnetic analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2022, 58 (9): 7500404
LeCun Y , Bengio Y , Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521 (7553): 436- 444.
Liao X Y , Shi Y J , Cheng H , et al. Study on distribution characteristics of groundwater resources intermountain basins in the eastern part of Altun Mountains. Progress in Geophysics, 2024, 39 (1): 421- 430.
Liu W , Wang H , Xi Z Z , et al. Physics-driven deep learning inversion with application to magnetotelluric. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14 (13): 3218
Liu W , Wang H , Xi Z Z , et al. Physics-informed deep learning inversion with application to noisy magnetotelluric measurements. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16 (1): 62
Ma J X , Deng Y F , Li X , et al. Recent advances in machine learning-enhanced joint inversion of seismic and electromagnetic data. Surveys in Geophysics, 2025, 46 (1): 197- 225.
MacBain J A , Bednar J B . Existence and uniqueness properties for the one-dimensional magnetotellurics inversion problem. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1986, 27 (2): 645- 649.
Mackie R L , Madden T R . Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysical Journal International, 1993, 115 (1): 215- 229.
Madden T M , Mackie R L . Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling and inversion. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1989, 77 (2): 318- 333.
Marquardt D W . An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1963, 11 (2): 431- 441.
Newman G A , Alumbaugh D L . Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients. Geophysical Journal International, 2000, 140 (2): 410- 424.
Newman G A , Boggs P T . Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 2004, 20 (6): S151- S170.
Odot A , Haferssas R , Cotin S . DeepPhysics: A physics aware deep learning framework for real-time simulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2022, 123 (10): 2381- 2398.
Oldenburg D W, Li Y G. 2005. Inversion for applied geophysics: A tutorial. //Butler D K ed. Near-Surface Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 13: 89-150, doi: 10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch5.
Pan K J , Ling W W , Zhang J J , et al. MT2DInv-Unet: A 2D magnetotelluric inversion method based on deep-learning technology. Geophysics, 2024, 89 (2): G13- G27.
Parker R L . Geophysical Inverse Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994
Peng R H , Hu X Y , Han B . 3D inversion of frequency-domain CSEM data based on Gauss-Newton optimization. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59 (9): 3470- 3481.
Pratt R G , Shin C , Hicks G J . Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 1998, 133 (2): 341- 362.
Puzyrev V . Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks. Geophysical Journal International, 2019, 218 (2): 817- 832.
Rahmani Jevinani M , Habibian Dehkordi B , Ferguson I J , et al. Deep learning-based 1-D magnetotelluric inversion: Performance comparison of architectures. Earth Science Informatics, 2024, 17 (2): 1663- 1677.
Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E. 2017. Physics informed deep learning (part Ⅰ): data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1711.10561.
Raissi M , Perdikaris P , Karniadakis G E . Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686- 707.
Ren P , Rao C P , Chen S , et al. SeismicNet: Physics-informed neural networks for seismic wave modeling in semi-infinite domain. Computer Physics Communications, 2024, 295: 109010
Rodi W L , Mackie R L . Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics, 2001, 66 (1): 174- 187.
Sasaki Y . Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2001, 46 (1): 45- 54.
Siripunvaraporn W , Sarakorn W . An efficient data space conjugate gradient Occam's method for three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 2011, 186 (2): 567- 579.
Tan H D , Yu Q F , Booker J , et al. Magnetotelluric three-dimensional modeling using the staggered-grid finite difference method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46 (5): 705- 711.
Tikhonov A N . Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Mathematics: Doklady, 1963, 4: 1035- 1038.
Tikhonov A N , Arsenin V Y . Solutions to Ill-posed Problems. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977
Unsworth M , Wenbo W , Jones A G , et al. Crustal and upper mantle structure of northern Tibet imaged with magnetotelluric data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004, 109 (B2): B02403
Varentsov I M , Kulikov V A , Yakovlev A G , et al. Possibilities of magnetotelluric methods in geophysical exploration for ore minerals. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2013, 49 (3): 309- 328.
Vozoff K. 1991. The magnetotelluric method. //Nabighian M N, Corbett J D eds. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Volume 2, Application, Parts A and B. SEG, 3: 641-712.
Wang S B , Li Y , Li T Y , et al. Regional maize suitability based on soil water and salt content inversion by integrating machine and transfer learnings in Xinjiang. Soil and Tillage Research, 2025, 254: 106740
Wei K R, Liu H Q, Cao H, et al. 2025. Research on inversion of borehole-surface electromagnetic method based on CNN-LSTM hybrid network. //Proceedings of the 3rd China Petroleum Geophysical Academic Annual Conference (Ⅳ) (in Chinese). Hangzhou, 58-61, doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2025.002599.
Wu X P , Xu G M . Study on 3-D resistivity inversion using conjugate gradient method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2000, 43 (3): 420- 427.
Xiao Y , Xue M X , He Z H , et al. Comparative study of Gauss-Newton and gradient waveform inversion. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2008, (18): 79- 82.
Xu F J , Xie X B , Guo Q S . Study and application on the nonlinear conjugate gradient inversion method for 2D magnetotelluric with different polarization modes. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61 (1): 174- 182.
Xu K J , Lu Y , Wang D Y , et al. Two-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion based on deep learning. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2024, 59 (5): 1174- 1183.
Xu K J , Liang S Y , Lu Y , et al. Magnetotelluric data inversion based on deep learning with the self-attention mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5917910
Yin Y X , Zhang L W , Tong X Z . Research on the two-dimensional magnetotelluric regularization inversion. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2014, (4): 19- 23.
Zhang J T , Zhou J , Wang X B , et al. Lagrange multiplier's search in one-dimensional magnetotelluric Occam's inversion. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 37 (6): 687- 692.
Zhang K , Yan J Y , Q T , et al. The study of upper crust electrical structure in Ningwu and adjacent area. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58 (12): 4505- 4521.
Zhao N , Wang X B , Qin C , et al. 3D frequency-domain CSEM inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59 (1): 330- 341.
Zhdanov M S . Inverse Theory and Applications in Geophysics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015
Zhou H Y , Guo R , Li M K , et al. Feature-based magnetotelluric inversion by variational autoencoder using a subdomain encoding scheme. Geophysics, 2024, 89 (1): WA67- WA83.
陈小斌. 2003. 大地电磁正反演新算法研究及资料处理与解释的可视化集成系统开发[博士论文]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.
向斌 , 庆田 , . 大地电磁测深反演方法现状与评述. 地球物理学进展, 2011, 26 (5): 1607- 1619.
观文 , 桐林 . 基于矢量有限元的带地形大地电磁三维反演研究. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63 (6): 2449- 2465.
展翔 . 电磁勘探技术的机遇与挑战及发展方向. 物探化探计算技术, 2019, 41 (4): 433- 447.
彦威 . TEM探测深部煤层上覆多电性层的OCCAM反演. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46 (6): 169- 173.
祖志 , 祥云 , 展翔 . 大地电磁非线性共轭梯度拟三维反演. 地球物理学报, 2006, 49 (4): 1226- 1234.
, 祥云 , , 等. 大地电磁二维反演方法分析对比. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32 (2): 476- 486.
秀英 , 英杰 , , 等. 阿尔金山东段山间盆地地下水资源分布特征研究. 地球物理学进展, 2024, 39 (1): 421- 430.
荣华 , 祥云 , . 基于高斯牛顿法的频率域可控源电磁三维反演研究. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59 (9): 3470- 3481.
捍东 , 钦范 , Booker J , 等. 大地电磁法三维交错采样有限差分数值模拟. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46 (5): 705- 711.
魏开瑞, 刘浩琦, 曹辉, 等. 2025. 基于CNN-LSTM混合网络的井地电磁法反演研究. //第三届中国石油物探学术年会论文集(四). 杭州, 58-61, doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2025.002599.
小平 , 果明 . 利用共轭梯度法的电阻率三维反演研究. 地球物理学报, 2000, 43 (3): 420- 427.
, 明星 , 振华 , 等. 高斯-牛顿法与梯度法波形反演比较研究. 内蒙古石油化工, 2008, (18): 79- 82.
凤姣 , 兴兵 , 全仕 . 不同极化模式的二维大地电磁非线性共轭梯度反演及应用研究. 石油物探, 2022, 61 (1): 174- 182.
凯军 , , 大勇 , 等. 基于深度学习的大地电磁二维反演研究. 石油地球物理勘探, 2024, 59 (5): 1174- 1183.
银轩 , 连伟 , 孝忠 . 大地电磁二维正则化反演研究. 铁道工程学报, 2014, (4): 19- 23.
君涛 , , 绪本 , 等. 一维大地电磁Occam反演拉格朗日乘子的搜索. 物探化探计算技术, 2015, 37 (6): 687- 692.
, 加永 , 庆田 , 等. 宁芜火山岩盆地及邻区上地壳电性结构研究. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58 (12): 4505- 4521.
, 绪本 , , 等. 三维频率域可控源电磁反演研究. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59 (1): 330- 341.

衷心感谢王德智、孙怀凤、张镕哲等教授在本文撰写过程中给予的宝贵指导与热心帮助.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(2606 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/