Method for calculating the dominant azimuth of rock fractures from the telluric field based on trend fitting

Yi LIN, ZhangHui AN, YingYing FAN, PeiYue LIU, LiHua YUAN

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3) : 1048-1059.

PDF(6858 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(6858 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3) : 1048-1059. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026JJ0259

Method for calculating the dominant azimuth of rock fractures from the telluric field based on trend fitting

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The dominant azimuth angle (α-angle) of telluric field rock cracks is an important parameter in geoelectric research, holding significant meaning for identifying seismic precursors. Traditional methods for calculating the α-angle based on harmonic amplitude ratios have certain limitations, particularly regarding the depiction of dynamic evolution processes and dependency on original data quality. This study aims to propose a new α-angle calculation method based on trend fitting to enhance the characterization capability of the dominant direction of rock cracks and the sensitivity of anomaly identification. This method separates the natural electric field from the telluric field, combines the phase information of various orders of electric field harmonics, and utilizes full-day data for trend fitting to calculate the dominant azimuth angle. Using observation data from 14 geoelectric stations within a 560 km radius of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MS7.0 earthquake epicenter (103.82°E, 33.20°N) for verification, a comparison with traditional calculation results shows that: For stations with well-developed rock cracks (Δα≤10°), such as the Pingliang and Gufeng stations, the results of the new method are similar to those of the traditional method, with minimal differences in polarization stability indicators (average SDS and MECM were 0.62% and 0.26%, respectively), verifying the correctness of the new method. More importantly, for stations exhibiting suspected pre-seismic anomalies (such as Tianshui, Chengdu, and Hanwang stations), the new method reveals anomaly phenomena, such as increased variation range or jumps in the α-angle, more significantly than the traditional method, demonstrating stronger anomaly detection capability. Therefore, the trend-fitting-based α-angle calculation method can not only effectively reflect the dominant direction of telluric field rock cracks but may also possess higher sensitivity to suspected pre-seismic anomalies, thus providing a useful supplement to pre-seismic geoelectric anomaly analysis. However, its universality across different geological environments still requires further verification.

Key words

Telluric field / Telluric field rock crack / Trend fitting / Pre-seismic anomalies

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yi LIN , ZhangHui AN , YingYing FAN , et al . Method for calculating the dominant azimuth of rock fractures from the telluric field based on trend fitting[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(3): 1048-1059 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026JJ0259

References

An Z H , Yuan L H , Li N , et al. Discussion on the application of HHT method to Geoelectric field data processing. Progress in Geophysics, 2010, 25 (2): 525- 532.
Bao H Y , Xia Z , Yang Y , et al. Analysis of consistency with anomalous focal mechanisms of small earthquakes and the dominant azimuth of the geoelectric field before the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MS7.0 earthquake in Sichuan Province. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2025, 46 (1): 78- 84.
Butler K E , Russell R D , Kepic A W , et al. Measurement of the seismoelectric response from a shallow boundary. Geophysics, 1996, 61 (6): 1769- 1778.
Chen Y , Huang T F , Liu E R . Rock Physics (in Chinese). Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2009, 6- 113.
Dong X N , Guan Y L , Wang Q L , et al. Advantageous azimuth characteristics of geoelectric fields in shandong region. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2025, 45 (10): 1071- 1078.
Fu A L , An Z H , Fan Y Y , et al. Study on the characteristics of geoelectric field response to the Menyuan MS6.9 earthquake on January 8, 2022 in Qinghai Province. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2022, 43 (6): 30- 40.
Li J H , Sun L L , Liu L , et al. Application of the geoelectric field dominant azimuth method in Anhui province. South China Journal of Seismology, 2024, 44 (S1): 174- 176.
Li M Y , Zhang Z H , Jiao M R , et al. Study on variation characteristics of natural electric field in Songyuan MS5.7 earthquake on May 28, 2018. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2022, 42 (12): 1276- 1280. 1276-1280, 1299
Li W , Fang G Q , Zhao W Z , et al. Analysis of synchronous abnormal signals of the geoelectric field in Shanghai. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37 (2): 499- 510.
Liao X F , Wang W M , Yang X , et al. Anomalous characteristics of the dominant azimuth of geoelectric fields at some stations in the Sichuan region before earthquakes. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2024, 46 (2): 465- 472.
Liu W , Chai N J , Wang Y L , et al. Analysis of the variation characteristics of the dominant azimuth angle of the geoelectric field at Wujiahe Seismic Station before and after the earthquake. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2025, 46 (1): 71- 77.
Ma J , Guo Y S . Accelerated synergism prior to fault instability: evidence from laboratory experiments and an earthquake case. Seismology and Geology, 2014, 36 (3): 547- 561.
Matsushima M , Honkura Y , Oshiman N , et al. Seismoelectromagnetic effect associated with the Izmit earthquake and its aftershocks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002, 92 (1): 350- 360.
Mikhailov O V , Haartsen M W , Toksoz M N . Electroseismic investigation of the shallow subsurface: field measurements and numerical modeling. Geophysics, 1997, 62 (1): 97- 105.
Takeuchi A , Lau B W S , Freund F T . Current and surface potential induced by stress-activated positive holes in igneous rocks. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2006, 31 (4-9): 240- 247.
Tan D C , Zhao J L , Xi J L , et al. A study on feature and mechanism of the tidal geoelectrical field. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53 (3): 544- 555.
Tan D C , Xin J C , Wang J J , et al. Application foundation and earthquake case analysis of the telluric field rock crack model. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62 (2): 558- 571.
Tian S , Zhang L , Wang J G , et al. Geoelectric field anomaly before wenchuan and Yushu earthquake. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27 (3): 878- 887.
Xin J C , Qi Y F , Yang W T , et al. Application of dominant azimuth of the telluric field in a typical interference environment. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2023, 45 (1): 161- 168.
Yisimayili A , Chen J H , Ci D , et al. Analysis on variation characteristics of dominant azimuth of rock fracture in hetian electric field. Inland Earthquake, 2021, 35 (3): 245- 252.
Yu C , Wang S Y , Yu H Z . Study of the electromechanical coupling process before the 2020 MS6.4 Yutian, China earthquake.. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12 (1): 17622
Yu C , Han Y , Fan Y , et al. Characteristic analysis of geoelectric field pulse signal at Dulan station before three M6 or above earthquakes in Northwest China from 2021 to 2022. Progress in Geophysics, 2025, 40 (4): 1383- 1393.
Zhang L Q , Gao S D , Li N . Anomaly characteristics of geoelectric field before Jishishan MS6.2 earthquake. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2025, 45 (4): 367- 372.
Zhang Z H , Huang M W , Li M Y , et al. Characteristics of earthquake precursor anomalies based on the telluric field rock crack water seepage model. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2021, 42 (2): 134- 136.
Zhang Z H , Ji Y H , Ji S X . Characteristics and mechanism analysis of geoelectric field variations for the Dalian pulandian M4.6 earthquake in 2023. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2023, 39 (4): 1- 6.
Zhao G Z , Zhang X M , Cai J T , et al. A review of seismo-electromagnetic research in China. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65 (7): 1229- 1246.
Zhao Y H , Li X , Feng L L , et al. Research on the characteristics of telluric field anomalies before Lushan MS7.0 and Maduo MS7.4 earthquakes. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2021, 42 (S1): 86- 89.
Zhao Y H , Li X , Feng L L , et al. Analysis of anomaly characteristics of the geoelectric field at Dawu Seismic Station before the Barkam MS6.0 earthquake swarm and Madoi MS7.4 earthquake. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2022, 43 (S1): 307- 309.
Zhao Y H , Su W G , Feng L L , et al. Characteristics of the dominant azimuth anomalies of geoelectric field at Dawu station before MS7.4 Maduo, Qinghai earthquake in 2021. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2023, 45 (1): 76- 83.
艾萨·伊斯马伊力 , 界宏 , , 等. 和田台地电场岩体裂隙优势方位角变化特征分析. 内陆地震, 2021, 35 (3): 245- 252.
张辉 , 丽华 , , 等. HHT方法在地电场数据处理中的应用. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25 (2): 525- 532.
海英 , , , 等. 2017年四川九寨沟MS7.0地震前地电场优势方位角与小震震源机制解异常一致性分析. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2025, 46 (1): 78- 84.
, 庭芳 , 恩儒 . 岩石物理学. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009, 6- 113.
晓娜 , 贻亮 , 庆林 , 等. 山东地区大地电场优势方位角特征分析. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2025, 45 (10): 1071- 1078.
阿龙 , 张辉 , 莹莹 , 等. 2022年1月8日青海门源县MS6.9地震地电场响应特征. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2022, 43 (6): 30- 40.
军辉 , 亮亮 , , 等. 地电场优势方位角方法在安徽地区的应用. 华南地震, 2024, 44 (S1): 174- 176.
梦莹 , 志宏 , 明若 , 等. 2018-05-28松原MS5.7地震地电场变化特征研究. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2022, 42 (12): 1276- 1280. 1276-1280, 1299
, 国庆 , 文舟 , 等. 上海地电场观测同步异常信号分析. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37 (2): 499- 510.
晓峰 , 玮铭 , , 等. 四川地区部分台站大地电场优势方位角震前异常特征分析. 地震工程学报, 2024, 46 (2): 465- 472.
, 宁娇 , 耀临 , 等. 乌加河地电场优势方位角地震前后变化特征. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2025, 46 (1): 71- 77.
, 彦双 . 失稳前断层加速协同化的实验室证据和地震实例. 地震地质, 2014, 36 (3): 547- 561.
大诚 , 家骝 , 继楼 , 等. 潮汐地电场特征及机理研究. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53 (3): 544- 555.
大诚 , 建村 , 建军 , 等. 大地电场岩体裂隙模型的应用基础与震例解析. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62 (2): 558- 571.
, , 建国 , 等. 汶川、玉树大地震前的地电场异常. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27 (3): 878- 887.
建村 , 银峰 , 婉婷 , 等. 典型干扰环境中的大地电场优势方位角应用探讨. 地震工程学报, 2023, 45 (1): 161- 168.
, , , 等. 2021—2022年西北地区3次6级以上地震前都兰台地电场脉冲信号特征分析. 地球物理学进展, 2025, 40 (4): 1383- 1393.
丽琼 , 曙德 , . 积石山MS6.2地震前地电场异常特征. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2025, 45 (4): 367- 372.
志宏 , 明威 , 梦莹 , 等. 基于大地电场岩体裂隙水渗流模型的地震前兆异常特征. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2021, 42 (2): 134- 136.
志宏 , 延辉 , 树新 . 2023年大连普兰店M4.6地震地电场变化特征及其机理分析.. 防灾减灾学报, 2023, 39 (4): 1- 6.
国泽 , 学民 , 军涛 , 等. 中国地震电磁研究现状和发展趋势. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2022, 52 (8): 1499- 1515.
玉红 , , 丽丽 , 等. 芦山MS7.0、玛多MS7.4地震前大地电场异常变化特征. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2021, 42 (S1): 86- 89.
玉红 , , 丽丽 , 等. 马尔康MS6.0震群和玛多MS7.4地震前大武地震台地电场异常特征分析. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2022, 43 (S1): 307- 309.
玉红 , 维刚 , 丽丽 , 等. 2021年青海玛多MS7.4地震前大武台地电场优势方位角异常特征分析. 地震学报, 2023, 45 (1): 76- 83.

本研究传统方法α角计算软件由甘肃省地震局王建军老师提供,对文中所使用地电场观测站一线工作人员辛勤工作,以及匿名审稿专家的有益建议,特此一并致谢.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(6858 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/