PDF(8233 KB)
Joint velocity modeling method of depth-domain tomography and full-waveform inversion constrained by geological information: application in the Dongpu Depression
YunDong GUO, QingYang LI, JianPing HUANG, QingDa LÜ, GuoLong LI, GuangSheng QIN, Xia WAN, XiangYu Meng
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 1623-1633.
PDF(8233 KB)
PDF(8233 KB)
Joint velocity modeling method of depth-domain tomography and full-waveform inversion constrained by geological information: application in the Dongpu Depression
Depth-domain tomography and Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) are the primary methods for subsurface velocity model building. Tomography relies on travel-time information, featuring high computational efficiency but with insufficient resolution. FWI utilizes the travel-time, amplitude and waveform information of seismic field data, providing high-precision, but is highly dependent on the initial model and seismic data quality, and prone to non-convergence issues during inversion. To comprehensively leverage the advantages of aforementioned techniques, we constructed a practical workflow and processing method for joint velocity modeling integrating depth-domain tomography and FWI under geological constraints. This approach involves using well logging data to constrain the construction of background velocity models and incorporating fault control information during both depth-domain tomography and full waveform inversion to constrain the updating direction. Comparative analysis of modeling results and actual data from the Dongpu exploration area demonstrates that the geologically constrained joint modeling method can: (1) obtain relatively accurate subsurface velocity models in complex fault-block areas; (2) suppress the influence of noise on inversion results; (3) achieve better fault positioning and seismic imaging in obscured zones; (4) significantly improve the focusing and flattening of image gathers; and (5) remarkably reduce well-to-seismic discrepancies.
Geological constraints / Depth-domain tomography / Full waveform inversion / Velocity model building / Dongpu depression
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cui C, Huang J P, Guo Y D, et al. 2017. Double-difference wave-equation reflection traveltime inversion. //2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Houston, Texas: SEG, 1476-1480, doi: 10.1190/segam2017-17589500.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Li G L, Li Y Y, Huang J P. 2025. Quadratic wasserstein metric full waveform inversion using the excitation representation of the source wavefield. //86th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Toulouse, France: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1-5 doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.202510895.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plessix R E, Rynja H. 2010. VTI full waveform inversion: a parameterization study with a narrow azimuth streamer data example. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010. Denver, Colorado: SEG, 962-966, doi: 10.1190/1.3513936.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sirgue L, Barkved O I, van Gestel J P, et al. 2009.3D waveform inversion on Valhall wide-azimuth OBC. //71st EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201400395.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |