PDF(6575 KB)
Magnetization direction estimation based on attention and multi-scale dilated convolutional neural network
HangHang XU, ZeLin LI
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 1682-1696.
PDF(6575 KB)
PDF(6575 KB)
Magnetization direction estimation based on attention and multi-scale dilated convolutional neural network
Determination magnetization direction is essential for processing and interpretation of magnetic data. However, traditional methods for estimating magnetization direction are often sensitive to noises and to effects of low latitude, leading to large deviations in the estimated directions. In contrast, deep learning methods can effectively mitigate the effects of the above problems. Therefore, we propose a multi-scale dilated convolution with squeeze-and-excitation neural network(MSDC-SENet) for magnetization direction estimation. This model extracts both local details and global features of magnetic data simultaneously through a multi-scale dilated convolution module. In addition, SE (squeeze and excitation networks) attention modules are added to enhance the focus on key features of magnetic anomalies. Synthetic data experiments show that test accuracy of MSDC-SENet model outperforms that of the original CNN model under most conditions. Particularly, on diverse datasets with different depths and locations, the inclination test accuracies of MSDC-SENet are improved by 4.82% and 14.22% to 91.56% and 89.47%, respectively, while the declination test accuracies are improved by 1.24% and 6.17%, respectively. The model is applied to synthetic data tests as well as magnetization direction estimation of aeromagnetic data from southern Australia. Compared with the existing methods, the model in this paper shows higher accuracy and robustness under complex conditions, providing an efficient and reliable method for magnetization direction estimation.
Magnetization direction / Attention mechanism / Multiscale / Dilated convolution / Deep learning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elllis R G, de Wet B, Macleod I N. 2012. Inversion of magnetic data from remanent and induced sources. //ASEG Extended Abstracts, Volume 2012, Issue ASEG2012-22nd Geophysical Conference. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1-4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. 2018. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. //Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City: IEEE, 7132-7141.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janocha K, Czarnecki W M. 2017. On loss functions for deep neural networks in classification. arxiv preprint arxiv: 1702.05659.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kingma D P, Ba J. 2017. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 1412.6980, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Li X, Wang W H, Hu X L, et al. 2019. Selective kernel networks. //Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach: IEEE, 510-519.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scherer D, Müller A, Behnke S. 2010. Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for object recognition. //20th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Thessaloniki: Springer, 92-101.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yacouby R, Axman D. 2020. Probabilistic extension of precision, recall, and F1 score for more thorough evaluation of classification models. //Proceedings of the first Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, 79-91.
|
|
Yu F, Koltun V, Funkhouser T. 2017. Dilated residual networks. //Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 636-644.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |