PDF(10050 KB)
Practical seismic exploration acquisition design based on compressed sensing theory
JingJie CAO, YuQi WANG, JinZong WANG
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 2026-2037.
PDF(10050 KB)
PDF(10050 KB)
Practical seismic exploration acquisition design based on compressed sensing theory
Seismic data acquisition serves as a critical foundation for seismic exploration. Since it accounts for the majority of the costs in seismic exploration, the optimization of acquisition technology is of great significance to the entire seismic exploration workflow. Constrained by the Nyquist sampling theorem, traditional acquisition methods require high sampling rates, lack flexibility in adapting to actual field conditions, and incur substantial exploration costs. Compressed sensing theory has been introduced into seismic exploration for more than a decade. Acquisition methods based on this theory allow for random deployment of receivers, reduce operational time, lower costs, and improve the efficiency of seismic exploration. However, existing compressed sensing based acquisition design methods cannot guarantee a consistent number of traces per shot, which adversely affects reconstruction quality. This paper proposes a two-step sampling method to overcome the inconsistency in the number of sampled traces per shot. The first step employs regular sampling to generate fixed sampling positions and control the spacing between adjacent receivers. The second step introduces random sampling to fill the gaps within the fixed scheme, enhancing the randomness of sampling, and subsequently generates sampling schemes that maintain a consistent number of traces per shot. Data experiments demonstrate that the reconstruction results from the two-step acquisition method achieve a higher signal-to-noise ratio compared to those from random sampling and piece-wise random sampling on average. Therefore, this method holds practical application value in seismic exploration.
Data acquisition / Compressed sensing / Regular sampling / Random sampling
|
Candes E J, Romberg J K. 2005. Signal recovery from random projections. //Proceedings Volume 5674, Computational Imaging Ⅲ. San Jose, California, United States: SPIE, 76-86.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jamali-Rad H, Kuvshinov B, Tang Z, et al. 2016. Deterministically subsampled acquisition geometries for optimal reconstruction. //78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1-5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titova A, Wakin M B, Tura A. 2019. Mutual coherence in compressive sensing seismic acquisition. //SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019. SEG, 122-126.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
门哲, 宁宏晓, 李伟波, 等. 2019. 基于压缩感知的随机采样与稀疏性约束采样重构效果对比. //中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会, 中国地球物理学会勘探地球物理委员会. 中国石油学会2019年物探技术研讨会论文集. 成都: 中国石油东方地球物理公司, 1148-1151.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |