Research on the disaster characteristics of the MW6.1 earthquake in the Hindu Kush region of eastern Afghanistan in 2025

BoWei GONG, Wei LI, YiMin WANG, DeChen ZHANG

Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1979-1987.

PDF(4481 KB)
Home Journals Progress in Geophysics
Progress in Geophysics

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Geophy      Editor in chief:

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
PDF(4481 KB)
Prog Geophy ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1979-1987. DOI: 10.6038/pg2026KK0046

Research on the disaster characteristics of the MW6.1 earthquake in the Hindu Kush region of eastern Afghanistan in 2025

Author information +
History +

Abstract

On August 31, 2025, a magnitude MW6.1 earthquake occurred in the Hindu Kush Mountains region of eastern Afghanistan, near Kunar and Nangarhar provinces, causing a large number of casualties and property damage. The earthquake further exacerbated the risk of disaster in the region due to Afghanistan's location in the intra-continental deformation zone at the junction of the Eurasian and Indian plates, with active tectonic activity, and the country has long faced a humanitarian crisis and weak infrastructure. In order to reveal the disaster characteristics of this earthquake, based on the Sentinel-1 satellite data, this paper uses Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to carry out coseismic deformation monitoring, and uses the coseismic deformation field as the constraint to invert the source parameters and static sliding distribution. The results show that the rupture depth of the earthquake is shallow, mainly concentrated within 8 km underground. The rupture is dominated by thrust motion and has a small tilt-slip component, with a maximum sliding amount of 2.5 m. At the same time, there were many strong aftershocks after the earthquake, the terrain of the earthquake area was steep, and many landslides occurred after the earthquake, and a large number of mud brick houses collapsed. As of September 4, 2025, the Afghan Red Crescent Society confirmed that the earthquake killed 3, 073 people and injured 3, 640, making it the deadliest earthquake event in Afghanistan in recent years. In view of the complex topography, poor building quality and dense population in the local area of the earthquake, this paper studies the population casualties and spatial distribution laws. The results show that the casualty population is highly concentrated in the river valleys and towns in the southern part of Kunar province and the northern part of Nangarhar province, which is closely related to the characteristics of local population aggregation along the river valley and the extremely poor seismic performance of traditional mud brick and adobe houses. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to pay attention to the secondary disaster hazards in the earthquake area and conduct multi-dimensional regional disaster risk assessment to reduce the systemic crisis in Afghanistan.

Key words

Afghanistan earthquake / InSAR / Coseismic deformation / Casualties / Western Himalayan syntaxis (WHS)

Cite this article

Download Citations
BoWei GONG , Wei LI , YiMin WANG , et al. Research on the disaster characteristics of the MW6.1 earthquake in the Hindu Kush region of eastern Afghanistan in 2025[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2026, 41(5): 1979-1987 https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2026KK0046

References

Akhundzadah N A. Earthquake risk severity and urgent need for disaster management in Afghanistan. GeoHazards, 2025, 6(1): 9.
Al-Ajmi F, Abdalla H, Abdelghaffar M, et al. Strength behavior of mud brick in building construction. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 6(3): 482- 494.
Ambraseys N, Bilham R. Earthquakes in Afghanistan. Seismological Research Letters, 2003, 74(2): 107- 123.
Chen C W, Zebker H A. Network approaches to two-dimensional phase unwrapping: Intractability and two new algorithms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2000, 17(3): 401- 414.
Chen J L, Zhou Y. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2023 earthquake doublet in Turkey and Syria from joint inversion of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data: an iterative modelling method for mapping large earthquake deformation. Geophysical Journal International, 2024, 237(1): 636- 648.
Chen Y. 2015. Study on rapid assessment method for destructive earthquake casualty[Master's thesis](in Chinese). Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration.
Danciu L, Şeşetyan K, Demircioglu M, et al. The 2014 earthquake model of the Middle East: seismogenic sources. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(8): 3465- 3496.
Fang L H, Wu J P, Wang W L, et al. Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of MS7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(28-29): 3451- 3459.
Fayyaz N, Miraj M A F, Ahsan N. 2024. Geomechanics of tectonic stress path constraints and outcrop deformation analysis of naturally fractured rocks: A case study along main boundary thrust (MBT) and Nathia Gali Thrust (NGT), NW-Himalayas, Pakistan. //International Geomechanics Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, ARMA-IGS-2024-0905, doi: 10.56952/igs-2024-0905.
Huang L Y, Cheng H H, Zhang H, et al. Discussion on fault planes of the Alaska MW7.9 earthquake, Jan 23, 2018. Progress in Geophysics, 2019, 34(3): 886- 895.
Kufner S K, Bie L, Gao Y, et al. The devastating 2022 M6.2 Afghanistan earthquake: Challenges, processes, and implications. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(11): e2022GL102176.
Li H Y, Xia C X, Zhang Y Z, et al. Dynamic population distribution and perceived impact area of the Xizang Dingri MS6.8 earthquake based on mobile phone location data. Sensors, 2026, 26(2): 457.
Li Q, Li C T, Liu G, et al. Study on the source rupture characteristics of the Afghanistan earthquake swarm in October 2023. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2025, 68(10): 3823- 3833.
Li W, Du J C, Zhang C, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of disaster and population casualties in Jishishan earthquake by fusing multi-source data. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2025, 50(2): 271- 283.
Liu J L, Lin J Q. Study on assessment method for earthquake casualty based on epicentral intensity. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2012, 21(5): 113- 119.
Liu Y, Xu C J, Wen Y M. Adaptive robust Kalman filter-based InSAR time series analysis for deformation monitoring. Advances in Space Research, 2026, 77(4): 4168- 4183.
Luo H, Xu D Y, Wang T. Geodetic source modeling of the destructive 2022 MW6.2 Afghanistan earthquake: A shallow, moderate-dipping, pure strike-slip event with a relatively high stress drop. Seismological Research Letters, 2025, 96(5): 2812- 2821.
Mallapaty S. Deadly Afghanistan quake challenges scientists trying to study it. Nature, 2022, 607(7919): 433.
Okada Y. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1985, 75(4): 1135- 1154.
Omari E S, Yaman Z. Difficulties in applying lean construction principles within Afghanistan's construction sector. Civil Engineering Beyond Limits, 2023, 3: 1870.
Qi Y H, Feng W P, Zhang Y, et al. Fault geometry, slip distribution, and potential triggering of the 2022 MW6.2 deadly Afghanistan earthquake revealed from geodetic and weather data. Seismological Research Letters, 2023, 94(5): 2154- 2166.
Rehman K, Ali W, Ali A, et al. Shallow and intermediate depth earthquakes in the Hindu Kush region across the Afghan-Pakistan border. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 148: 241- 253.
Rosen P A, Gurrola E, Sacco G F, et al. 2012. The InSAR scientific computing environment. //EUSAR 2012; 9th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar. Nuremberg, Germany: VDE, 730-733.
Royden L H, Burchfiel B C, van der Hilst R D. The geological evolution of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Science, 2008, 321(5892): 1054- 1058.
Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Armijo R. On the mechanics of the collision between India and Asia. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1986, 19(1): 113- 157.
Verma R K, Sekhar C C. Seismotectonics and focal mechanisms of earthquakes from Pamir-Hindukush regions. Tectonophysics, 1985, 112(1-4): 297- 324.
Wan Y G. Determination of center of several focal mechanisms of the same earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(12): 4718- 4728.
Wang S, Zhang Y Z, Jiang Y T, et al. Slip velocity of fault induced by PSO algorithm with dynamical inertial weight and dimension mutation. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(4): 1766- 1771.
Waseem M, Lateef A, Ahmad I, et al. Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan. Journal of Seismology, 2019, 23(2): 217- 242.
Wei Y G, Jiang C S. Research progress of artificial intelligence technology in the application of earthquake disaster reduction. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(2): 516- 524.
Xu J, Zhao X H, Zhou Q, et al. Features of the casualty by the 2022 Luding, Sichuan MS6.8 earthquake. Journal of Seismological Research, 2023, 46(4): 603- 610.
Xu Y H, Diao F Q, Xiong X. Co-and early post-seismic InSAR observations reveal complex rupture of the 2023 Herat earthquake sequence, NW Afghanistan. Geophysical Journal International, 2026, 244(1): ggaf442.
Yang Z B. 2020. Multi-scale scenario simulation and 3D visualization of urban earthquake disaster[Ph. D. thesis] (in Chinese). Beijing: Tsinghua University, doi: 10.27266/d.cnki.gqhau.2020.000010.
Yin Z Q. Methods for Earthquake Disaster and Loss Prediction. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1995
Zhao L, Nissen E, Xu W B, et al. Variable fault geometry controls the cascading 2023 Herat, Afghanistan multiplet sequence. Communications Earth & Environment, 2025, 6(1): 135.
Zhong Y C, Gao H, Lin H, et al. Mechanism and Co-seismic effects of the 2023 Herat earthquake sequence in Afghanistan based on InSAR. Tectonophysics, 2026, 920: 231038.
Zhu D M, Wang D M. The study of earthquake deaths forecasting model based on the earthquake resistance index of the whole country. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2021, 30(6): 51- 60.
陈尧. 2015. 破坏性地震人员伤亡快速评估方法研究[硕士论文]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.
黄 禄渊, 程 惠红, 张 怀, 等. 2018年1月23日阿拉斯加MW7.9地震发震节面讨论. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(3): 886- 895.
李 琦, 李 承涛, 刘 刚, 等. 2023年10月阿富汗震群震源破裂特征研究. 地球物理学报, 2025, 68(10): 3823- 3833.
李 伟, 杜 锦辰, 张 超, 等. 融合多源数据研究积石山地震灾害及人口伤亡时空演化. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2025, 50(2): 271- 283.
刘 金龙, 林 均岐. 基于震中烈度的地震人员伤亡评估方法研究. 自然灾害学报, 2012, 21(5): 113- 119.
万 永革. 同一地震多个震源机制中心解的确定. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(12): 4718- 4728.
王 帅, 张 永志, 姜 永涛, 等. 维多样性的动态权重粒子群算法反演断层滑动速率. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(4): 1766- 1771.
隗 永刚, 蒋 长胜. 人工智能技术在地震减灾应用中的研究进展. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(2): 516- 524.
许 娟, 赵 雪慧, 周 琪, 等. 2022年四川泸定MS6.8地震人员震亡特征分析. 地震研究, 2023, 46(4): 603- 610.
杨哲飚. 2020. 城市多尺度地震灾害情境模拟及可视化[博士论文]. 北京: 清华大学, doi: 10.27266/d.cnki.gqhau.2020.000010.
尹 之潜. 地震灾害及损失预测方法. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995
朱 达邈, 王 东明. 基于全国建筑抗震能力指数修正的地震人员死亡预测模型研究. 自然灾害学报, 2021, 30(6): 51- 60.

感谢审稿专家提出的修改意见和编辑部的大力支持!

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright ©2026 Progress in Geophysics. All rights reserved.
PDF(4481 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉