Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Application of MOFs-Derived Metal Oxides in Catalytic Total Oxidation of VOCs

  • Tao Peng ,
  • Qianqian Chai ,
  • Chuanqiang Li , * ,
  • Xuxu Zheng ,
  • Lingjuan Li
Expand
  • School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Received date: 2023-05-11

  Revised date: 2023-07-11

  Online published: 2023-08-06

Supported by

Chongqing Technical Innovation and Application Development Special Surface Project(cstc2020jscx-msxmX0071)

Chongqing Technical Innovation and Application Development Special Surface Project(CSTB2022TIAD-GPX0033)

Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission(KJZD-K202300709)

Abstract

The emission of a significant amount of VOCs has resulted in severe impacts on both human health and the environment. Currently, the most effective method for treating VOCs is their total oxidation to carbon dioxide and water through metal oxide catalysis. To enhance the catalytic performance of metal oxides, various synthetic strategies have been developed, including morphology, defect, and doping engineering. However, these processes are cumbersome and require further improvements to enhance the catalytic performance. On the other hand, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-derived metal oxides have been extensively used to catalyze the complete oxidation of VOCs. This is because of their tunable morphology, large specific surface area, high defect concentration, and excellent doping dispersion. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive summary of the application of MOFs-derived metal oxides in the total oxidation of VOCs. Therefore, this paper reviews the synthesis conditions, doping methods, and pyrolysis conditions of MOFs from the control strategy of derived metal oxides. It also summarizes the regulation methods and the relationship between the physicochemical properties of derived metal oxides and the total oxidation performance of VOCs. Additionally, this paper discusses the future development and challenges of MOFs-derived metal oxides.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Regulatory strategies of MOFs-derived metal oxides and their application in catalytic total oxidation of VOCs

2.1 Synthesis conditions

2.2 Doping methods

2.3 Pyrolysis conditions

3 Mechanism of catalytic VOCs total oxidation

4 Conclusion and outlook

Cite this article

Tao Peng , Qianqian Chai , Chuanqiang Li , Xuxu Zheng , Lingjuan Li . Application of MOFs-Derived Metal Oxides in Catalytic Total Oxidation of VOCs[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2024 , 36(1) : 81 -94 . DOI: 10.7536/PC230511

1 Introduction

In the past few decades, atmospheric environmental problems have attracted more and more attention. Among them, how to deal with Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has become one of the hot issues of air pollution[1,2]. VOCs mainly come from petroleum refining, chemical raw material production, resin synthesis, printing and dyeing industries. These compounds can be classified according to their organic structure into alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, aromatics, halogenated hydrocarbons, and oxygen/nitrogen/sulfur-containing compounds[3,4]. A large number of VOCs can cause photochemical smog, haze, sick buildings, plant decay, and even human cancer[5]. Various methods have been developed to treat VOCs, such as catalytic total oxidation, photocatalysis, incineration, adsorption, biofiltration and membrane filtration[6~11]. Among them, catalytic complete oxidation is considered to be a feasible treatment method because of its high economic feasibility, simple operation, low secondary pollution, controllable by-products and low reaction temperature[12-14]. At present, complete oxidation catalysts are mainly divided into precious metal catalysts and metal oxide catalysts[15,16]. Compared with noble metal catalysts, which are expensive and easy to sinter and deactivate, metal oxide catalysts with abundant sources and good economy have rich potential in the field of VOCs catalysis[17,18][12]. In recent years, there have been many excellent articles summarizing the application and progress of complete oxidation of VOCs catalyzed by metal oxides[2,19~22]. However, considering that the synthesis strategy, morphology, and structure of current catalysts are difficult to precisely control, and the defect concentration and utilization of doping atoms are low, further exploration of synthetic strategies with high-performance catalysts is needed.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new type of porous materials composed of Metal ions/clusters and multidentate organic ligands[23,24]. It has been widely used in adsorption, separation, storage, sensing and catalysis due to its large specific surface area, controllable morphology and tunable pore size distribution[25~27]. MOFs usually employ multidentate carboxylates as organic ligands to assemble with metal ion/cluster bridges to form various framework structures. This is beneficial for the MOFs-derived materials obtained by pyrolysis to inherit their morphologies and pore structures, such as carbides, nitrides, oxides, etc. Most importantly, nanoparticles of Derived metal oxides (Derived metal oxides, DMOs) are not easy to agglomerate due to the confinement and dispersion effect of organic ligands on metal atoms in MOFs[28~30]. In addition, the reversibility of coordination bonds, a large number of adsorption sites and pores of MOFs can accommodate more second-phase metals, which makes the mixed metal oxides (DMMOs) Derived from MMOFs (Mixed metal-organic frameworks) have better synergistic ability and higher dispersion threshold. These characteristics make DMOs attract much attention.
Although there are many reviews on the application of DMOs, there is a lack of synthetic regulatory strategies and application summaries for VOCs[31~34]. In recent years, more and more studies have focused on the complete oxidation of VOCs catalyzed by DMOs, and it is necessary to summarize the relevant developments in this paper[35,36]. In this review, we will summarize the application of DMOs in the catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs in the past 5 years. We focus on the effects of the synthesis strategies of DMOs on the physicochemical properties (specific surface area, pore structure, surface element state, and defect concentration) and catalytic activity of the catalysts, and divide them into three categories according to the control strategies: MOFs synthesis condition control, doping mode control, and pyrolysis condition control. Then, the latest mechanism of catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs is discussed. It is expected that this review can promote the application of MOFs-derived metal oxides in catalyzing the complete oxidation of VOCs.

2 Regulation Strategy of MOFs Derived Metal Oxides and Their Application in Catalytic Total Oxidation of VOCs

The morphology and structure of MOFs directly depend on the synthesis conditions, such as the synthesis method, the choice of metal and organic ligands, temperature and solvent, so the morphology and structure of MOFs can be controlled by adjusting these conditions. Especially for MMOFs, different doping methods have a large effect. In addition, the conditions during pyrolysis, such as temperature, atmosphere, calcination time and heating rate, can seriously affect the physical structure and chemical characteristics of oxides, thus inducing the catalytic activity of different VOCs. In this paper, we will discuss the control of MOFs synthesis conditions, doping methods and pyrolysis conditions on DMOs. Table 1 summarizes the research progress of MOFs-derived MOs in catalyzing the complete oxidation of VOCs in the past 5 years.
表1 近5年来MOFs衍生的MOs在VOCs的研究总结

Table 1 Summary of research on MOFs-derived MOs in VOCs in recent five years

Catalyst MOF pyrolysis conditions pollutant Concentration(ppm) WHSV(mL·gcat−1·h−1) T90(℃) ref
CeO2/Co3O4 CoCe-BDC Air, 350 ℃ Acetone 600 18 600 180 35
CeCoOx-MNS ZIF-67 Air, 450 ℃ Toluene 3000 30 000 249 44
CeO2-1 Ce-BTC Air, 450 ℃ o-xylene 500 48 000 198 52
Co3O4-R Co-MOF-74 Air, 350 ℃ o-xylene 100 120 000 270 37
Mn-100-AR-O MIL-101(Mn) O2 after Ar,
700 ℃
Toluene 1000 30 000 265 49
ZSA-1-Co3O4 ZSA-1 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene / 20 000 240 40
CeO2 Ce-MOF-808 Air, 250 ℃ Toluene 1000 30 000 278 41
Mn3O4-MOFs-74-300 Mn-MOF-74 Air, 300 ℃ Toluene 1000 20 000 218 50
CeCoOx-200 Ce[Co(CN)6]2·nH2O Air, 500 ℃ Toluene 3000 30 000 168 56
Co3O4-400 ZIF-67 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 12000 21 000 259 43
CeO2-C Ce-BTC Air, 450 ℃ o-xylene 500 48 000 193 62
Co2Mn3 MnCo-BTC Air, 350 ℃ Propane 10000 120 000 255 45
M-Co2Cu1Ox CoCu-MOF-74 Air, 400 ℃ Toluene 1000 30 000 220 66
MOF-Mn1Co1 Mn3[Co(CN)6]2·nH2O Air, 450 ℃ Toluene 500 96 000 226 75
MnOx-CeO2-MOF Ce/Mn-MOF-74 Air, 600 ℃ Toluene 1000 60 000 220 78
CuMn2Ox CuMn -BTC N2,350 ℃&500 ℃ Acetone 1019 18 000 144 80
MnOx-CeO2-s Mn/Ce-BTC Air, 600 ℃ ethylacetate 500 60 000 205 83
CuO/Co3O4 Cu/ZIF-67 Air, 500 ℃ Toluene 1000 20 000 229 84
M-Co1Mn1Ox Mn/ZSA-1 Air, 500 ℃ Toluene - 20 000 192 85
15Mn/Cr2O3-M Cr-MIL-101 Air, 500 ℃ Toluene 1000 60 000 268 86
10%CeO2-MnOx Mn-BTC Air, 300 ℃ Toluene 1000 48 000 275 89
M-Co1Cu1Ox Mn/ZSA-1 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 1000 20 000 208 88
MnOx/Co3O4-4 h Mn/ZIF-67 Air, 350 ℃ chlorobenzene 1000 60 000 334 90
MnOx/Co3O4-10 Mn/ZIF-67 O2 after N2, 500 ℃ Toluene 1000 120 000 242 70
CoMn6 Mn/ZIF-67 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 1000 60 000 219 92
MOF-CMO/400 Mn3[Co(CN)6]2·nH2O Air, 400 ℃ Toluene 1000 20 000 209 72
M-Co3O4-350 ZSA-1 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 1000 20 000 239 95
Co3O4-350 Co-BTC Air, 350 ℃ Propane 10000 60 000 275 96
CeO2-MOF/ 350 Ce-BTC Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 1000 12 000 260 97
1Mn1Ce-300 MnCe-BTC O2 after Ar,
300 ℃
Toluene 1000 30 000 244 103
HW-MnxCo3-xO4 ZIF-67 Air, 350 ℃ Toluene 3000 30 000 188 104
MnOx-NA Mn-BDC O2 after N2, 350 ℃ Acetone 600 56 000 167 105
MnOx@ZrO2-NA MOF-808 O2 after N2, 300 ℃ Toluene 1000 60 000 260 106
MnOx-700 Mn-MOF-74 Air, 700 ℃ chlorobenzene 50 12 000 225 109
3Mn2Ce Mn/Ce-BTC O2 after Ar,
300 ℃
Toluene 1000 30 000 236 117

2.1 Synthetic condition

Generally, there are two ways to form MOFs, one is that metal ions directly coordinate with organic ligands to form metal-organic frameworks, and the other is that metal elements first form secondary building units (SBUs) and then coordinate with organic ligands to form frameworks. Because there are many metal elements that can form the structure of MOFs, such as transition metal elements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Co, etc.), lanthanide metal elements, main group metal elements, etc., this will form different forms of SBUs. In addition, organic ligands also have a wide range of choices, such as carboxylic acids, pyridine, imidazole and so on. Therefore, the morphology, specific surface area and pore structure can be selectively tailored by adjusting the element type, bridging length and coordination teeth number of metal/organic ligands. Of course, other synthesis conditions can also control the morphology and structure of MOFs, such as synthesis method, reaction temperature and solvent. The morphology and structure of DMOs can be controlled by adjusting the morphology and structure of MOFs through the above method, so as to produce different catalytic complete oxidation activities of VOCs.

2.1.1 Metal/organic ligand regulation

MOFs with different morphologies can be formed by different metal sources and organic ligands, and these morphologies can be completely mapped into DMOs by pyrolysis. Ma et al. Synthesized MOF-74 with rod-like morphology and MOF-39 with spherical morphology from 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid and 1,3,5-tris (4-carboxyphenyl) benzene using Co as a metal source, and then pyrolyzed them to form Co3O4-R with rod-like morphology and Co3O4-S( with spherical morphology (Fig. 1A)[35]. It is found that Co3O4-R mainly exposes the (220) crystal plane, and compared with the (311) crystal plane with three-coordination lattice oxygen exposed by Co3O4-S, the (220) crystal plane with two-coordination lattice oxygen has a lower oxygen vacancy formation energy and a higher oxygen adsorption energy, which is conducive to the formation of oxygen vacancies and the supplement of gaseous oxygen, so that Co3O4-R can convert 98% of o-xylene at 270 ℃. In addition, many studies have shown that specific crystal faces can effectively promote the adsorption of gaseous pollutants or oxygen, thereby improving catalytic activity[38,39]. Lei et al. Also prepared three morphologies of Co-MOFs using Co as metal source and 2-methylimidazole, 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid, imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid as organic ligands[40]. The study shows that the activity of Co3O4 with three different ligands and morphologies on toluene decreases according to the following rule: :ZSA-1-Co3O4( octahedral )>MOF-74-Co3O4( rod-like )>ZIF-67-Co3O4( dodecahedral shape) (Figure 1B),This is positively correlated with the specific surface area of the catalyst and the surface elemental state (more Co3+ and Oads)). Larger specific surface area can provide more adsorption sites, and specific surface element States (such as Co3+ and Mn4+)) can be used as active sites for catalytic reactions to upgrade the catalytic activity of VOCs[46~48].
图1 (a) Co3O4-R和Co3O4-S的形貌及o-xylene上的催化氧化活性[37];(b) ZSA-1-Co3O4、MOF-74-Co3O4和ZIF-67-Co3O4的形貌以及甲苯完全氧化活性[40];(c) Ce-MOF-808、Ce-BTC、Ce-UiO-66的XRD图谱[41];(d) DMF/水控制Co-MOF-74尺寸和形貌的机制[42];(e) 1.7 μm、800 nm和400 nm尺寸ZIF-67的合成过程[43];(f) 立方状、网状纳米片、棒状的Co-MOFs的合成步骤[44];(g)球磨法制备MOFs衍生MnCo二元氧化物的示意图[45]

Fig. 1 (a) Morphology of Co3O4-R and Co3O4-S and catalytic oxidation activity on o-xylene[37]; (b) Morphology of ZSA-1-Co3O4, MOF-74-Co3O4 and ZIF-67-Co3O4 and complete oxidation activity of toluene[40]; (c) XRD patterns of Ce-MOF-808, Ce-BTC and Ce-UiO-66[41]; (d) Mechanism of DMF/ water control on the size and morphology of Co-MOF-74[42]; (e) Synthesis of ZIF-67 at 1.7 μm, 800 nm and 400 nm[43]; (f) Synthesis steps of cubic, reticular nanosheet and rod-like Co-MOFs[44]; (g) Schematic diagram of preparation of MoFs-derived MnCo dioxides by ball milling[45]

Zhang et al. Used Mn as the metal source and different organic ligands (terephthalic acid and trimesic acid) to form MOFs precursors with different morphologies, and then prepared octahedral Mn-100-Ar-O2, spherical Mn-74-Ar-O2 and rod-like Mn-BTC-Ar-O2 by heat treatment[49]. The results showed that these catalysts were all Mn2O3 with similar specific surface area, but the octahedral Mn-100-Ar-O2 had better reducibility at low temperature and larger pore size, which was easier to reduce the migration resistance of VOCs, thus showing the best catalytic activity for toluene. Similarly, Chen et al. Also prepared two Mn-MOFs through 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid and trimesic acid, and they found that different morphologies and structures would also lead to different phases of oxide formation, which was related to the combustion of organic ligand carbon.When the spherical Mn-MOFs-74 was also calcined at 400 ℃, the Mn3O4structure was obtained, while the Mn2O3 structure was obtained for Mn-BDC, which made the two catalysts have different toluene catalytic activities[50]. Sun et al. Used Ce as the metal source to prepare Ce-MOF with three different morphological structures through terephthalic acid and trimesic acid, and they found that the morphology would seriously affect the temperature at which the framework was converted into carbon skeleton and the decomposition temperature of carbon skeleton during the pyrolysis of MOF[41]. As shown in Figure 1C, Ce-MOF-808 begins to decompose the organic framework into carbon skeleton at 220 ℃ and recrystallize into CeO2 at 300 ℃, while Ce-UIO-66 and Ce-BTC begin to transform into carbon skeleton at 320 ℃ and obtain crystalline CeO2 at 330 and 350 ℃, respectively.At the same time, the temperature range of carbon skeleton preservation decreases according to the rule of Ce-MOF-808 > Ce-BTC > Ce-UiO-66. The existence of a large number of carbon skeletons can limit the grain growth and obtain a high concentration of defects in the combustion, which is consistent with its catalytic activity for the complete oxidation of toluene.
Of course, in addition to the regulation of the metal/organic ligand species, the ratio can also be regulated, and a smaller metal/organic ligand ratio will reduce the size of the crystal[51]. Mei et al. Prepared a series of CeO2 catalysts by varying the molar ratio of cerium nitrate and trimesic acid[52]. It was found that with the increase of the molar ratio of cerium nitrate to trimesic acid, the crystal size of the oxide increased, while the pore volume, oxygen vacancy content and lattice oxygen mobility decreased.Therefore, the CeO2-1 produced at a molar ratio of cerium nitrate to trimesic acid of 1:1 showed the best catalytic oxidation performance, which could degrade 90% of o-xylene at 198 ℃.

2.1.2 Synthesis temperature and solvent

Nucleation and growth are the important steps of crystal crystallization, and temperature and solvent can control the nucleation rate and growth rate of crystal, especially the coordination of some solvents to metal ions, which leads to the selective growth of crystal faces[53~55]. Therefore, the morphology and structure of MOFs can also be changed by adjusting the synthesis temperature and solvent of MOFs. Han et al. Obtained one-dimensional nanoparticles (100 ℃), two-dimensional hexagonal sheets (25 ℃) and three-dimensional nanoflowers (200 ℃) by changing the synthesis temperature of Ce[Co(CN)6][56]. Because the three-dimensional nanoflowers have more oxygen vacancies, Ce3+ and Co3+, the complete oxidation of toluene can be realized at 200 deg C. In addition, water, alcohol and N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) are good solvents for the synthesis of MOFs precursors, and different ratios of alcohol/water, DMF/water, DMF/alcohol/water can affect the nucleation and growth rate of MOF crystals, thus regulating the morphology, structure, size and pore size of MOFs[54,57~59]. For example, Huang et al. Found that in the DMF/water two-solvent system, the proportion of water in Co-MOF-74 can regulate the deprotonation rate of organic ligands, affect the nucleation efficiency of crystals, and thus regulate the morphology and structure (Fig. 1D)[42]. Zhao et al. Also prepared ZIF-67 with different sizes (400, 800, 1700 nm) by changing the synthesis temperature and solvent conditions (Figure 1E)[43]. The results show that the precursor with small size also has smaller grain size after pyrolysis, which has higher atom utilization and exposes more Co3+, so that the removal rate of toluene can reach 90% at 259 ℃.
In addition to this, acid and CTAB have also been used as capping agents to control the morphology through selective coordination of metal ions[60,61]. However, the results show that CTAB can not only change the morphology of the precursor, but also reduce the energy of recrystallization during pyrolysis, inhibit the agglomeration of particles, reduce the grain size, increase the oxygen vacancy content, and greatly increase the catalytic complete oxidation activity of o-xylene[62]. In addition, considering that MOFs materials are composed of secondary building units (SBUs), Dong et al. Obtained cubic, net-like nanosheets, and rod-like Co-MOFs (Figure 1 f) by adding acid to modulate the SBUs and reconstructing the framework, in which the net-like nanosheet-derived cobalt-based oxides showed excellent toluene complete oxidation performance[44].

2.1.3 Synthetic method

In addition to the conventional hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis of MOFs precursors to achieve morphology and structure control, other methods can also be used, such as microwave method, spinning method, mechanochemical method, etc., and the MOFs prepared by these methods often have more special structures[63-65]. Our research group prepared Mn/Co-BTC with different Mn-Co molar ratios by mechanical ball milling, and the synthesis route is shown in Fig. 1G. The morphology of the MnCoOx prepared by the method is completely different from that of the catalyst prepared by the conventional hydrothermal method, which shows a porous flocculent morphology, rich defects and a large specific surface area, and can complete 90% of propane elimination at 255 deg C[45]. In addition, Sun et al. Also prepared spherical CoyCu3−y-MOF-74 by mechanical ball milling, which showed excellent catalytic complete oxidation performance of toluene[66].

2.2 Doping method

Benefiting from the structural advantages of metal-organic frameworks, MMOFs with high catalytic VOCs complete oxidation performance can be obtained by synthesizing MMOFs through various doping methods and then pyrolytically reconstructing the crystal phase[28]. At present, there are two kinds of treatments for MMOFs: one is to synthesize MMOFs directly under the same conditions, and then pyrolyze to obtain MMOs; The other is to prepare monometallic MOFs and their derivatives by secondary synthesis methods such as impregnation, then dope another metal ion into the framework structure of MOFs, and finally pyrolyze to obtain MMOs.

2.2.1 Primary synthesis

The primary synthesis is often heavily doped to obtain binary complex oxides with uniform dispersion. Mn-MOF, Co-MOF derived oxides are currently the most studied and the most effective catalysts for catalyzing the complete oxidation of VOCs[73,74]. Based on the similar size and physical and chemical characteristics of the two ions, it is easy to form MOFs with similar structures, so MnCo-MOF with uniform structure can be directly obtained by one-step synthesis, and then MnCo binary oxides with uniform dispersion can be formed by pyrolysis, and the physical and chemical properties of MOFs-derived oxides can be effectively controlled by the proportion of metal ions. Luo et al. Prepared different Mn3[Co(CN)6]2·nH2O precursors by changing the ratio of Mn and Co (1:1, 1:2, 2:1), and pyrolyzed to form the corresponding cubic MOF-MnxCoy[75]. The results show that the ratio of Mn and Co can control the morphology and size of the oxide, and there is a strong interaction between Mn and Co, which can form (Co,Mn)(Co,Mn)2O4 after pyrolysis, and a large number of surface adsorbed oxygen, surface Mn4+, Co3+ concentration and good reducibility make the MOF-Mn1Co1 have the best toluene catalytic activity. Tu et al. Also found that the Mn1Co1 derived from M3(HCOO)6(M=Mn, Co) prepared when the ratio of Mn and Co was 1:1 had the best catalytic activity for formaldehyde oxidation[76].
The synthesis of mixed metal oxides by Ce-MOF is also widely studied, especially the precursor of MOFs can achieve the mixing of bimetallic elements at the molecular level, which can enhance the degree of aliovalent metal substitution to CeO2 in the subsequent pyrolysis process. Guo et al. First examined the similarities and differences between CeCu-BTC derived Ce-Cu-Ox and CeO2-CuO obtained by first preparing Ce-BTC derived CeO2 and then impregnating Cu and calcining[77]. The results showed that the two catalysts were rod-like, and there was no significant difference in specific surface area and crystal structure, but the catalyst synthesized by MOFs had a higher dispersion scale, a strong interaction between Ce and Cu, and more defects. Wang et al. Also prepared diamond-shaped multilayer CeCuBDC by a one-step synthesis method, and then made a high degree of heterovalent substitution of Cu into the CeO2 lattice by pyrolysis, which brought abundant defect structures while forming a solid solution (Figure 2A), so that the formed CeCuOx had better catalytic performance for methanol, acetone and o-xylene[68]. Other metals, such as Mn and Co, can also achieve a high degree of substitution for the CeO2 lattice through MOF, thus showing excellent catalytic performance for VOCs[67,78,79]. Li et al. Compared the different catalytic properties of CoCeBDC-derived CoCeOx and common supported prepared Co3O4/CeO2[67]. As shown in Figure 2B, Co3O4 in Co3O4/CeO2 exists on the surface of CeO2, while Co in CoCeOx is heterovalently substituted into the lattice of CeO2, forming defects while effectively restricting grain growth and forming a larger specific surface area, thus showing superior catalytic performance in a series of VOCs (methanol, acetone, toluene, o-xylene). By comparing the MnOx-CeOx-MOF obtained by pyrolysis of MOF-74 with the MnOx-CeOx-CP prepared by precipitation method, Sun et al. Found that the MnOx-CeOx-MOF has higher specific surface area, pore volume, defect level and surface Mn4+, and is easier to adsorb, activate and migrate oxygen species. At the same time, they also found that Ce doped with Mn can limit grain growth, improve low-temperature reducibility and oxygen storage capacity, so that the MnOx-CeOx-MOF can convert 90% of toluene at 208 ℃[78]. In addition, Wang et al. Prepared CuMn2Ox with a three-phase (CuO, Mn3O4, CuMn2O4)) interface by pyrolyzing Cu/Mn-BTC, and found that the abundant defects on the interface were beneficial to the activation of oxygen adsorption, which could complete 90% of acetone catalytic oxidation at 144 ° C[80]. Similarly, CuMn-ptcda derived flower-like CuMnOx also showed excellent acetone complete oxidation performance[81].
图2 (a) CoCeBDC衍生的CoCeOx和普通负载制备Co3O4/CeO2[68];(b) CeCuBDC衍生的异价取代的CeCuOx[67];(c) MOFs的掺杂位点[33];(d) 硝酸镍掺杂ZIF-67制备中空NiOx/Co3O4的流程[69];(e) 协同热解-氧化-吸附制备MnOx/Co3O4的过程[70];(f) Co-MOFs封装到有序介孔CeO2中制备CeCoOx的流程[71];(g) 中空CoMn2O4的制备方法[72]

Fig. 2 (a) Co3O4/CeO2 was prepared by CoCeOx derived from CoCeBDC and ordinary load[68]; (b) CoCeBDC derived heterovalent substituted CoCeOx[67]; (c) Doping sites of MOFs[33]; (d) Preparation of hollow NiOx/Co3O4 by doping ZIF-67 with nickel nitrate[69]; (e) The preparation of MnOx/Co3O4 by synergistic pyrolysis-oxidation-adsorption[70]; (f) CeCoOx was prepared by encapsulation of Co-MOFs into ordered mesoporous CeO2[71]; (g) Preparation method of hollow CoMn2O4[72]

2.2.2 Secondary synthesis

The secondary synthesis is mainly for modification on the basis of the first phase metal. As shown in Figure 2C, after the formation of monometallic MOFs, the second phase metal enters the MOFs structure through the connection of SBUs, SBUs ion replacement, pore intercalation, and organic ligand connection, respectively, to obtain MMOFs[33]. The infiltration amount of the second phase metal can be adjusted by modifying the synthesis parameters of substitution (such as concentration, reaction time, etc.), and then MMOs with different doping amounts can be formed by pyrolysis[82]. Jiang et al. First studied the difference between the MnOx-CeO2-h of Mn ion directly soaking doped CeO2 and the formation of MnOx-CeO2-s by Mn doping on Ce-BTC and then pyrolysis[83]. The results show that the Mn and Ce elements in the MnOx-CeO2-s are more dispersed, and the doping of Mn produces a large number of F-OVs (Frankel-type oxygen vacancies), which is conducive to the production of Frankel oxygen atoms for the reaction with ethyl acetate and improves the catalytic activity. Xu et al. Also found that Cu-doped ZIF-67-derived CuO/Co3O4 has a higher defect level than physically mixed CuO-Co3O4, making it easier for lattice oxygen for toluene oxidation to be replenished[84]. The doping concentration of the second phase metal in MMOFs is often controlled by changing the concentration of the soaking solution. Lei et al. Obtained different Mn-doped ZSA-1 by soaking different amounts of ZSA-1 in manganese nitrate solution (50%). When the doping ratio was 1:1, the obtained M-Co1Mn1Ox showed the best toluene catalytic activity, which was the same as the ratio of MnCoOx with the best complete oxidation performance prepared by one synthesis[85]. Chen et al. Obtained a series of nickel nitrate-doped ZIF-67 by changing the concentration of nickel nitrate solution (10%, 20%, 35%, 50%), followed by pyrolysis to obtain hollow NiOx/Co3O4( Fig. 2D)[69]. It was found that with the increase of nickel doping, nickel oxide entered the lattice of Co3O4 and the defects increased, and the nickel ions in the pore would restrict the collapse of the pore during pyrolysis.So as to obtain larger specific surface area and more surface adsorbed oxygen, but too much doping will lead to the destruction of the hollow structure, resulting in a decrease in activity, so the 35-NiOx/Co3O4 shows the best toluene catalytic activity. They also studied the doping of different amounts of Mn on MIL-101-Cr, and found that the introduction of Mn reduced the strength of Cr-O bond, and the lattice oxygen was easier to dissociate to form active oxygen and oxygen vacancies.However, excessive Mn doping will lead to the coating of MnOx on the surface of Cr2O3, and the isolated manganese oxide phase will be formed in the part exceeding the uniform distribution, which will reduce the surface active oxygen and the low temperature reduction ability[86]. Wang et al. Studied the doping of different amounts (1%, 5%, 10%) of Co on spherical Ce-MOF, and the study showed that a small amount of Co could be highly dispersed into the CeO2 lattice, but excessive Co agglomerated, thus forming a Co3O4 phase separated from the CeO2 phase, so the CoCe-5 prepared with a doping amount of 5% had the best catalytic activity for toluene[87]. Similar findings were found in other studies, for example, when Ni was doped into ZSA-1 and derived oxides, it was found that Ni was not doped into the lattice of Co3O4, but dispersed on the surface of Co3O4 in the form of NiO, and the active sites of Co3O4 decreased, which reduced the catalytic activity of toluene[88]. However, it does not mean that excessive doping will lead to a decrease in the activity of catalytic VOCs, which is related to the monolayer dispersion threshold and the intrinsic activity of doped oxides[89].
In addition to directly soaking metal ions with a specific content, the amount of doping can also be controlled by changing the soaking time. Hu et al. Studied the core-shell MnOx/Co3O4 derived from Mn doped ZIF-67 with different soaking time, and found that with the increase of soaking time, the amount of Mn loaded on the surface of Co increased, and there was a strong interaction between Mn and Co. When the Mn/Co molar ratio was 0. 13 (soaking for 4 H), it showed the lowest reduction temperature and the most oxygen desorption, so it could oxidize 90% of chlorobenzene at 342 ℃[90].
There are also some interesting strategies for repyrolysis of secondarily synthesized MMOFs (or their derivatives) to obtain DMMOs. Han et al. Proposed to prepare ZIF-67 carbonitride first, impregnate Mn on the adsorption sites of nitrogen-doped carbon matrix, and then cooperate with pyrolysis-oxidation-adsorption to prepare MnOx/Co3O4( with different ratios of Co to Mn (1:1, 1:5, 1:10) (Fig. 2e)[70]. Mao et al. Prepared flower-like ZIF-67-on-CuCoBDC metal-organic framework by a simple exchange extended growth method, and derived a Co3O4-CuCo2O4 with a heterostructure for low-temperature catalytic oxidation[91]. Zhao et al. Proposed a strategy of assembling CoMnOx by oxidation etching[92]. In this method, ZIF-67 was first prepared, then treated by different concentrations of potassium permanganate (1, 6, 11 G/L), and finally calcined to obtain the corresponding CoMnOx. The addition of potassium permanganate makes the material etched and reassembled, and the smooth surface becomes stacked sheets, resulting in abundant low crystallization areas, dislocation areas and phase interfaces, which effectively reduces the complete oxidation temperature of toluene. In addition, combining MOF with oxides and then pyrolyzing to prepare bimetallic oxides is also a potential strategy. Some researchers first synthesized CeO2 nanowires, then added 2-methylimidazole to synthesize CeO2-ZIF-67, and finally obtained dodecahedral CeO2-Co3O4 nanoframes with nanowire insertion by pyrolysis at 400 ℃[93]. While Wen et al. Proposed to embed and anchor Co-MOFs in the ordered mesoporous CeO2structure to prepare the Co-MOFs@CeO2 composite precursor with ordered mesoporous channel structure (Fig. 2 f), and finally pyrolyze to obtain the CeCoOx catalyst with mesoporous structure, which can completely oxidize 90% of toluene at 220 ° C[71]. Through the Kirkendall effect, solid MOFs precursors can also be prepared into oxide catalysts with special hollow structures. Luo et al. And Chen et al. Respectively prepared MnCo2O4 and NiOx/Co3O4( with a cubic hollow structure by using the Kirkendall effect (Fig. 2g), and this three-dimensional hollow structure showed a higher defect level, which enabled the catalyst to effectively oxidize toluene deeply at low temperature[72][69].

2.3 Pyrolysis condition

Pyrolysis is a bridge for the derivation of MOFs into metal oxides, and the conditions of pyrolysis (such as calcination temperature, heating rate, and calcination atmosphere) will determine the physical and chemical characteristics of the derived MOs, especially the MOFs have tens of thousands of framework structures, which lead to significant differences in ligand decomposition, pore collapse, and phase transition processes[28,94].

2.3.1 Pyrolysis temperature

Lei et al. Investigated the transformation of ZSA-1 from MOFs to metal oxides by pyrolyzing Co-MOF (ZSA-1) at 250, 350, 450 ° C[95]. It is found that when the temperature rises to 250 ℃, the MOF organic linker decomposes, the pores collapse and the material becomes amorphous, the specific surface area decreases from 1382 m2·g−1 to 2.5 m2·g−1, and the pore volume decreases from 0.67 to 0.003 cm3·g−1. When the temperature continues to rise to 350 ℃, the material recrystallizes to form Co3O4.The specific surface area and pore volume increased, and the { 110 } crystal plane family with more Co3+ was exposed. With the temperature rising to 450 ℃, the material collapsed further, the grain growth became larger, the specific surface area decreased, and the { 111 } crystal plane family with less Co3+ was exposed, which led to the decrease of catalytic activity for toluene. Similarly, in our previous study, it was also found that with the increase of the temperature of pyrolyzed MOFs, the crystal agglomeration growth led to the increase of grain size, the decrease of specific surface area and the collapse of pore structure, while the column-layered Co-BTC pyrolyzed at 350 ℃ showed the best propane catalytic activity due to the smallest grain size, the largest pore volume and the most defect concentration[96]. Chen et al. Also found that as the pyrolysis temperature of rod-like Ce-BTC increased from 350 ℃ to 500 ℃, the crystallite size became larger, the specific surface area decreased, and the Ce3+/Ce4+, Osur/Olat, defect concentration and oxygen storage capacity decreased. Therefore, the CeO2-MOF-350 obtained by pyrolysis at 350 ℃ showed the best toluene catalytic activity, and 90% of toluene could be converted at 223 ℃[97]. However, Zhang et al. Found that flower-like Ce-BTC could not be completely pyrolyzed to form CeO2 when calcined at 400 ℃, so the specific surface area was smaller and the grain size was larger, while when the pyrolysis temperature rose to 500 ℃, it had the largest specific surface area and the smallest grain size, thus showing the best oxidation catalytic activity[98]. It is worth noting that in their later work (Fig. 3A), by increasing the amount of oxygen for calcination (30%O2/Ar), the flower-like Ce-BTC was successfully pyrolyzed at 300 ℃ and formed CeO2-300 with good crystallinity.At the same time, the DMF in the pore of Ce-BTC will form a large number of pore structures during pyrolysis (250 ℃), showing an ultra-high specific surface area (648 m2·g−1), but this pore structure will collapse during subsequent pyrolysis (300 ℃), and the specific surface area will be greatly reduced by (77 m2·g−1[99].
图3 (a) 不同温度下热解Ce-BTC的图解模型[99];(b) ZIF-67在不同热解条件下的形貌图解[104];(c) 两段式制备MnOx-NA的过程[105];(d) 两段式制备MnOx@ZrO2-NA的过程[106]

Fig. 3 (a) Graphical models of pyrolysis Ce-BTC at different temperatures[99]; (b) Morphology diagram of ZIF-67 under different pyrolysis conditions[104]; (c) Two-stage preparation of MnOx-NA[105]; (d) A two-stage process for preparing MnOx@ZrO2-NA[106]

Cui et al. Prepared Fe-MIL-100 using Fe as the metal source, and explored the physicochemical properties of Fe2O3-X(X=400, 430, 450, 500 ℃) derived from different pyrolysis temperatures[100]. The results show that when the organic ligand is not completely pyrolyzed (400 ℃), the specific surface area and reduction ability increase with the increase of temperature, while after complete pyrolysis (430 ℃), the specific surface area and reduction ability decrease with the increase of temperature, so the Fe2O3-430 shows the best catalytic activity. Zhang et al. Pyrolyzed Mn-MIL-100 at different temperatures to obtain Mn2O3 with different physicochemical properties, among which Mn2O3-700℃ obtained at 700 ° C had the best catalytic oxidation performance due to the smallest particle size, the lowest reduction temperature, the highest Mn3+/Mn4+ and Oads/Olatt[101]. Many other studies have also shown that pyrolysis temperature can greatly affect the grain size, specific surface area, surface composition and redox properties[102]. The calcination temperature also has a decisive effect on the physicochemical properties of bimetallic organic framework-derived composite metal oxides. Zhang et al. Prepared rod-like MnCe-BTC and pyrolyzed at 200, 300, 400 and 500 ℃ to prepare the corresponding MnCeOx[103]. The results show that the pyrolysis process of bimetallic MOFs is similar to that of monometallic MOFs, and too high calcination temperature may lead to grain agglomeration and reduced interaction and redox. It is worth noting that for the CoyCu3−y-MOF-74 prepared by mechanical ball milling, the calcination temperature has no significant effect on the catalytic performance of its derived M-Co2Cu1Ox for toluene[66].

2.3.2 Heating rate

In addition, different heating rates during pyrolysis can also affect the catalytic activity. Zhao et al. Respectively prepared HW-MnxCo3−xO4 and BIB-MnxCo3−xO4 with pyrolysis heating rates of 1 and 10℃·min−1, as shown in Fig. 2b, a higher heating rate (10℃·min−1) would lead to the structural collapse of hollow dodecahedron,The specific surface area decreased sharply from 59. 7 to 7.3 m2·g−1, and the lower heating rate (10℃·min−1) would make the crystal have smaller particle size and more defect concentration, and improve the catalytic performance of toluene[104]. Other researchers have also found that for UiO-66 (Ce), high heating rates lead to the formation of CeO2 with larger crystal size, fewer defects and active sites, which leads to lower oxidation and reduced catalytic activity[107]. This is mainly due to the fact that at low calcination rates, the organic ligands of MOFs can fully form carbon skeletons, which will restrict crystal growth during subsequent calcination and form defects during subsequent calcination[105]. At higher calcination rates, the organic ligands are directly and completely oxidized, the carbon skeleton is not effectively formed, the pores collapse rapidly, a large number of metal ions agglomerate, the grain size increases, and the defect concentration and pore size decrease compared with those at lower calcination rates, so the ability to catalyze the complete oxidation of VOCs decreases.

2.3.3 Pyrolysis atmosphere

In fact, the two-stage calcination method, in which MOFs are pretreated with inert gas, has the same principle as the lower calcination heating rate, which is to form a carbon skeleton. However, the catalyst obtained by the two-stage calcination method has a greater improvement in the catalytic performance of VOCs, which may be related to the degree of carbon skeleton formation by organic ligands. For example, when Zhang et al. Prepared metal oxides with different ligands, they found that the Mn2O3 obtained by argon treatment followed by air pyrolysis had better toluene catalytic activity, which was attributed to the formation of carbon skeleton by organic ligands in MOFs materials under inert atmosphere, thus limiting the growth of Mn metal particles[49]. Zheng et al. systematically studied the differences in structure and catalytic performance of catalysts produced by nitrogen pretreatment and direct air pyrolysis (Fig. 3C)[105]. The results show that nitrogen pretreatment can form amorphous carbon, which can limit the grain growth in the subsequent calcination process, while the carbon can form oxygen vacancies in the subsequent combustion process to enhance the catalytic activity. Therefore, compared with the MnOx-A produced by direct air pyrolysis, the MnOx-NA produced by nitrogen pretreatment and re-pyrolysis has smaller crystal size, larger specific surface area, pore volume, pore size and oxygen vacancy concentration, so that the mixture of acetone, toluene and acetone can be degraded by 90% at 167 and 180 ℃, respectively. On this basis, Li et al. used the carbon formed by nitrogen pretreatment as a molecular fence, and doped Mn on the surface of MOFs to form a double restriction, as shown in Figure 2D. The molecular fence can restrict the collapse of pores in the subsequent pyrolysis process, and restrict the growth of Mn doped on MOF-808, thereby improving the catalytic performance of toluene[106].
There are also researchers who adopt other atmospheres to treat MOFs, such as typical oxidizing gas O2, reducing gas H2, inert gas Ar[108]. Of course, it is also feasible to pyrolyze MOFs directly under nitrogen conditions, but this requires the presence of in-situ oxygen in the organic ligand itself. In addition, too high temperature will also lead to the destruction of the structure, the reduction of specific surface area, and the reduction of catalytic VOCs activity[109].

3 Mechanism of catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs

Because there are many types of VOCs, the types of catalysts are also varied, and the reaction mechanisms of different pollutants on various catalysts are also different, so the establishment of a suitable catalytic reaction mechanism is helpful to guide the preparation of highly active catalysts. There are three main models for the current understanding of the catalytic mechanism: Mars-van Krevelen (MvK), Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH), Eley-Rideal (ER). Among them, MvK model and LH model are the most widely used models for VOCs on complete oxidation of DMOs[73,110~112].
The MvK model, also known as the redox model, is widely used in the catalytic complete oxidation mechanism of various VOCs. The model contains two steps: (I) VOCs are adsorbed on the catalyst and oxidized by the surface lattice oxygen of the catalyst, while the catalyst is reduced and oxygen vacancies are generated on the surface, as shown in Figure 4A; (ii) As shown in Fig. 4 B, surface oxygen vacancies adsorb molecular oxygen to form new surface lattice oxygen, so that the catalyst is oxidized. Some scholars also believe that the oxygen vacancy in step (ii) is supplemented by bulk lattice oxygen, which is supplemented by molecular oxygen adsorbed by other oxygen vacancies[81,113]. However, the source of oxygen atoms in both catalysts is the same, that is, the molecular oxygen in the gas phase supplements the lattice oxygen in the catalyst[79]. Through the alternation of these two steps, VOCs molecules are deeply oxidized. The LH model is also a commonly used mechanism for catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs, as shown in Figure 4C, which is understood that oxygen is adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst to form active oxygen species, which then react with the adsorbed VOCs molecules to form products and desorb them. The ER mechanism is completely different from the former two, emphasizing that VOCs molecules are not adsorbed, but react with the adsorbed active oxygen. The use of the model is not single, and the current catalytic mechanism of VOCs is more inclined to the common use of MvK model and LH model. For example, Liu et al. Found that with the increase of temperature, LH mechanism occurs first and then MvK mechanism occurs on the MnCoOx of toluene[114]. DRIFTS shows that strong benzoate and phenol bands appear at 225 ℃ under nitrogen condition, while they decrease sharply after heating to 275 ℃, which indicates that lattice oxygen begins to participate in the reaction and shows MvK mechanism; Under aerobic conditions, strong benzoate and phenol bands appear at 150 ℃ and decrease when the temperature rises to 225 ℃, which proves that they have been completely oxidized. In this process, molecular oxygen reacts with toluene intermediates through oxygen vacancies to form surface active oxygen, which can catalyze the complete oxidation of toluene at low temperatures, showing LH mechanism. Dong et al. Found that toluene could only react with surface lattice oxygen to form intermediate substances such as benzyl alcohol and benzoate in the absence of oxygen in the study of complete oxidation of toluene catalyzed by CeCoOx-MNS derived from reticular nanosheets Co-MOFs-MNS.In the presence of oxygen, oxygen can be adsorbed by the oxygen vacancies of the catalyst itself to form active oxygen species, and the toluene reacts with the active oxygen species to form CO2 and H2O[44]. A similar finding was found in the complete oxidation of o-xylene catalyzed by CeO2 prepared by MOF. Under nitrogen atmosphere, the surface lattice oxygen is limited, and the intermediate of o-xylene can only be formed slowly without further oxidation[52]. In addition, some isotope experiments and kinetic experiments also show that the MvK model together with the LH model leads to the catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs[115,116].
图4 (a, b) MvK模型反应步骤; (c) LH模型反应步骤

Fig. 4 (a, b) MvK model reaction steps; (c) LH model reaction steps

4 Summary and Prospect

4.1 Sum up

Metal oxide catalysts as the best strategy to catalyze the complete oxidation of VOCs, and different synthesis methods will determine the physicochemical properties of the catalysts. According to the above conclusions, the catalytic performance of metal oxides for complete oxidation of VOCs is affected by morphology, specific surface area, pore structure, grain size, defect concentration, and surface oxygen species. As an emerging porous material, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have large specific surface area, abundant active sites, tunable morphology and pore structure, which give them rich application scenarios. Benefiting from the above advantages of MOFs, MOFs precursors with different morphologies and structures can be obtained by adjusting the selection of metal/organic ligands, the ratio of metal/organic ligands, the synthesis temperature, the synthesis solvent and the synthesis method, and the metal oxides obtained by pyrolysis can completely inherit the morphology and structure of MOFs. In addition, DMMOs with high dispersion can be obtained by doping MMOFs with uniform dispersion of two-phase metals. The specific surface area, pore structure, grain size, defect concentration and surface oxygen species of DMOs can also be adjusted by carefully controlling the calcination temperature, heating rate and calcination atmosphere. We firmly believe that DMOs will be widely used in catalyzing the complete oxidation of VOCs.

4.2 Outlook

Although many strategies have been explored to synthesize DMOs as mentioned above, there is still much research to be continued.
(1) At present, the organic ligands of MOFs precursors are expensive, and the solvothermal synthesis of MOFs takes a long time or has complex routes, so it is necessary to create simple, green and efficient synthesis methods. For example, terephthalic acid, a common organic ligand for the synthesis of MOFs, can be obtained by acid, alkali and water treatment of specific waste plastics (PET), which can be used as a resource for waste utilization to achieve the purpose of waste treatment by waste. At the same time, synthesis methods such as mechanical ball milling and ultrasonic method can greatly shorten the synthesis time and reduce the use of organic solvents in the reaction, but there are few studies on related methods, and further understanding of the impact of these syntheses on the oxidative physicochemical properties of MOFs is needed.
(2) The conversion of MOFs to metal oxides requires the elimination of organic carbon in the ligand, and pyrolysis is the simplest and most effective method, but higher pyrolysis temperature will cause the collapse of the pore structure of MOFs, the remodeling of the crystal phase, the growth of the grain size, and the agglomeration of nanoparticles, which will reduce the performance of catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop methods for low-temperature pyrolysis of MOFs. At present, some studies have begun to use alkali to treat MOFs to form derivatives, but they have not completely obtained pure oxides, which need further exploration.
(3) The current research on the catalytic complete oxidation of VOCs by DMOs is usually focused on a single gas, and there is a lack of research on mixed gases for practical applications. In addition, there are few studies on the stability and anti-toxicity of DMOs, so it is necessary to further promote the relevant research status.
[1]
Zhang Z X, Jiang Z, Shangguan W F. Catal. Today, 2016, 264: 270.

[2]
Zheng Y F, Fu K X, Yu Z H, Su Y, Han R, Liu Q L. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2022, 10(27): 14171.

[3]
He C, Cheng J, Zhang X, Douthwaite M, Pattisson S, Hao Z P. Chem. Rev., 2019, 119(7): 4471.

[4]
Zhang S H, You J P, Kennes C, Cheng Z W, Ye J X, Chen D Z, Chen J M, Wang L D. Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 334: 2625.

[5]
Kamal M S, Razzak S A, Hossain M M. Atmos. Environ., 2016, 140: 117.

[6]
Feng C, Xiong G, Jiang F, Gao Q, Chen C, Pan Y, Fei Z, Li Y, Lu Y, Liu C. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 284: 120269.

[7]
Almaie S, Vatanpour V, Rasoulifard M H, Koyuncu I. Chemosphere, 2022, 306: 135655.

[8]
Li X Q, Zhang L, Yang Z Q, Wang P, Yan Y F, Ran J Y. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 235: 116213.

[9]
Zheng S J, Qian Y, Wang X B, Vujanović M, Zhang Y J, Ur Rahman Z, Yang P H, Duan F, Tan H Z, De Toni A, Li Y, Mikulćić H. Fuel, 2022, 315: 123149.

[10]
Lelicińska-Serafin K, Rolewicz-Kalińska A, Manczarski P. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019, 16(17): 3009.

[11]
Xie L H, Liu X M, He T, Li J R. Chem, 2018, 4(8): 1911.

[12]
Yang R J, Guo Z J, Cai L X, Zhu R S, Fan Y Y, Zhang Y F, Han P P, Zhang W J, Zhu X G, Zhao Q T, Zhu Z Y, Chan C K, Zeng Z Y. Small, 2021, 17(50): 2103052.

[13]
Min X, Guo M M, Liu L Z, Li L, Gu J N, Liang J X, Chen C, Li K, Jia J P, Sun T H. J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 406: 124743.

[14]
Zhao Q, Zheng Y F, Song C F, Liu Q L, Ji N, Ma D G, Lu X B. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2020, 265: 118552.

[15]
Lou B Z, Shakoor N, Adeel M, Zhang P, Huang L L, Zhao Y W, Zhao W C, Jiang Y Q, Rui Y K. J. Clean. Prod., 2022, 363: 132523.

[16]
Kim H S, Kim H J, Kim J H, Kim J H, Kang S H, Ryu J H, Park N K, Yun D S, Bae J W. Catalysts, 2022, 12(1): 63.

[17]
Lu Y Q, Deng H, Pan T T, Wang L, Zhang C B, He H. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2022, 606: 154834.

[18]
Shen K, Gao B, Xia H Q, Deng W, Yan J R, Guo X H, Guo Y L, Wang X Y, Zhan W C, Dai Q G. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2022, 56(12): 8854.

[19]
Guo Y L, Wen M C, Li G Y, An T C. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2021, 281: 119447.

[20]
Wu X, Han R, Liu Q, Su Y, Lu S, Yang L, Song C, Ji N, Ma D, Lu X. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2021, 11(16): 5374.

[21]
Huang H B, Xu Y, Feng Q Y, Leung D. Catal. Sci. \& Technol., 2015, 5: 2649.

[22]
Liu R, Wu H, Shi J H, Xu X M, Zhao D, Ng Y H, Zhang M L, Liu S J, Ding H. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2022, 12(23): 6945.

[23]
Li H L, Eddaoudi M, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi O M. Nature, 1999, 402(6759): 276.

[24]
He T, Kong X J, Bian Z X, Zhang Y Z, Si G R, Xie L H, Wu X Q, Huang H L, Chang Z, Bu X H, Zaworotko M J, Nie Z R, Li J R. Nat. Mater., 2022, 21(6): 689.

[25]
Hussain I, Iqbal S, Hussain T, Chen Y T, Ahmad M, Javed M S, AlFantazi A, Zhang K L. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9(33): 17790.

[26]
Li Y Z, Wang G D, Ma L N, Hou L, Wang Y Y, Zhu Z H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13(3): 4102.

[27]
Li D D, Xu H Q, Jiao L, Jiang H L. EnergyChem, 2019, 1(1): 100005.

[28]
Hu H, Guan B Y, Xia B Y, David Lou X W. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(16): 5590.

[29]
Cong Y Q, Chen X, Wang W X, Ye L J, Zhang Y, Lv S W. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2022, 655: 130266.

[30]
Li C Q, Liu X, Yang X Y, Peng T, Li Y Q, Chen M W, Lin C C, Jiang J, Su Z Y, Kong W J, Wang Y. Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(13): 18460.

[31]
Zhou W X, Tang Y J, Zhang X Y, Zhang S T, Xue H G, Pang H. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2023, 477: 214949.

[32]
Sanati S, Abazari R, Albero J, Morsali A, García H, Liang Z B, Zou R Q. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed., 2021, 60(20): 11048.

[33]
De Villenoisy T, Zheng X R, Wong V, Mofarah S S, Arandiyan H, Yamauchi Y, Koshy P, Sorrell C C. Adv. Mater., 2023, 35(24): 2370174.

[34]
Reddy R K, Lin J N, Chen Y Y, Zeng C, Lin X M, Cai Y P, Su C. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2020, 420: 213434.

[35]
Zheng Y F, Zhao Q, Shan C P, Lu S C, Su Y, Han R, Song C F, Ji N, Ma D G, Liu Q L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(25): 28139.

[36]
Wang L, Yin G Y, Yang Y Q, Zhang X D. React. Kinetics Mech. Catal., 2019, 128(1): 193.

[37]
Ma Y, Wang L, Ma J Z, Wang H H, Zhang C B, Deng H, He H. ACS Catal., 2021, 11(11): 6614.

[38]
Jian Y F, Tian M J, He C, Xiong J C, Jiang Z Y, Jin H, Zheng L R, Albilali R, Shi J W. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2021, 283: 119657.

[39]
Xie Y J, Yu Y Y, Gong X Q, Guo Y, Guo Y L, Wang Y Q, Lu G Z. CrystEngComm, 2015, 17(15): 3005.

[40]
Lei J, Wang S, Li J P. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2020, 220: 115654.

[41]
Sun W J, Li X M, Sun C, Huang Z, Xu H L, Shen W. Catalysts, 2019, 9(8): 682.

[42]
Huang C, Gu X Y, Su X Y, Xu Z C, Liu R, Zhu H J. J. Solid State Chem., 2020, 289: 121497.

[43]
Zhao J H, Tang Z C, Dong F, Zhang J Y. Mol. Catal., 2019, 463: 77.

[44]
Dong F, Han W G, Guo Y, Han W L, Tang Z C. Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 405: 126948.

[45]
Li C Q, Liu X, Peng T, Zhang T, Lin C C, Zhang Y Y, Chai Q Q, Qiu W G, Song L Y. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 619: 156698.

[46]
Lu S C, Han R, Wang H, Song C F, Ji N, Lu X B, Ma D G, Liu Q L. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 448: 137629.

[47]
Feng C, Chen C, Xiong G Y, Yang D, Wang Z, Pan Y, Fei Z Y, Lu Y K, Liu Y Q, Zhang R D, Li X B. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 328: 122528.

[48]
Ma Y, Wang L, Ma J Z, Liu F D, Einaga H, He H. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2022, 56(13): 9751.

[49]
Zhang X D, Lv X T, Bi F K, Lu G, Wang Y X. Mol. Catal., 2020, 482: 110701.

[50]
Chen J J, Bai B B, Lei J, Wang P, Wang S, Li J P. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2022, 263: 118065.

[51]
Marshall C R, Staudhammer S A, Brozek C K. Chem. Sci., 2019, 10(41): 9396.

[52]
Mei J, Shen Y, Wang Q L, Shen Y, Li W, Zhao J K, Chen J R, Zhang S H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14(31): 35694.

[53]
Niu Y D, Yuan Y, Zhang Q, Chang F F, Yang L, Chen Z W, Bai Z Y. Nano Energy, 2021, 82: 105699.

[54]
Jang J S, Koo W T, Kim D H, Kim I D. ACS Cent. Sci., 2018, 4(7): 929.

[55]
Zhai C B, Zhang H P, Du L Y, Wang D X, Xing D J, Zhang M Z. CrystEngComm, 2020, 22(7): 1286.

[56]
Han W L, Zhao H J, Dong F, Tang Z C. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(45): 21307.

[57]
Zhang B X, Zhang J L, Liu C C, Sang X X, Peng L, Ma X, Wu T B, Han B X, Yang G Y. RSC Adv., 2015, 5(47): 37691.

[58]
Cheng X Q, Zhang A F, Hou K K, Liu M, Wang Y X, Song C S, Zhang G L, Guo X W. Dalton Trans., 2013, 42(37): 13698.

[59]
Wang S M, Liu H R, Zheng S T, Lan H L, Yang Q Y, Zheng Y Z. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 304: 122378.

[60]
Guo H L, Zhu Y Z, Wang S, Su S Q, Zhou L, Zhang H J. Chem. Mater., 2012, 24(3): 444.

[61]
Sun D, Tang Y G, Ye D L, Yan J, Zhou H S, Wang H Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(6): 5254.

[62]
Mei J, Zhang S H, Pan G J, Cheng Z W, Chen J R, Zhao J K. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2022, 10(6): 108743.

[63]
Babu R, Roshan R, Kathalikkattil A C, Kim D W, Park D W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(49): 33723.

[64]
Gu W H, Lv J, Quan B, Liang X H, Zhang B S, Ji G B. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 806: 983.

[65]
Yue C G, Lin Y H, Sang J T, Li Z Y, Zhang P B, Fan M M, Leng Y, Jiang P P, Haryono A. Mater. Today Commun., 2022, 31: 103270.

[66]
Sun N, Zhang Y F, Wang L Y, Cao Z Z, Sun J M. J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 928: 167105.

[67]
Li Y X, Han W, Wang R X, Weng L T, Serrano-Lotina A, Bañares M A, Wang Q Y, Yeung K L. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2020, 275: 119121.

[68]
Wang Q Y, Li Z M, Bañares M A, Weng L T, Gu Q F, Price J, Han W, Yeung K L. Small, 2019, 15(42): 1903525.

[69]
Chen X, Li J J, Chen X, Cai S C, Yu E Q, Chen J, Jia H P. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2018, 1(6): 2971.

[70]
Han D W, Ma X Y, Yang X Q, Xiao M L, Sun H, Ma L J, Yu X L, Ge M F. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 603: 695.

[71]
Wen M, Dong F, Tang Z C, Zhang J Y. Mol. Catal., 2022, 519: 112149.

[72]
Luo L, Huang R, Hu W, Yu Z S, Tang Z X, Chen L Q, Zhang Y H, Zhang D, Xiao P. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2022, 5(6): 8232.

[73]
Hu Z, Tang Z Y, Zhang T, Yong X, Mi R L, Li D, Yang X, Yang R T. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2022, 61(14): 4803.

[74]
Lu T L, Su F C, Zhao Q, Li J X, Zhang C S, Zhang R Q, Liu P P. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 296: 121436.

[75]
Luo Y J, Zheng Y B, Zuo J C, Feng X S, Wang X Y, Zhang T H, Zhang K, Jiang L L. J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 349: 119.

[76]
Tu S, Chen Y, Zhang X Y, Yao J Z, Wu Y, Wu H X, Zhang J Y, Wang J L, Mu B, Li Z, Xia Q B. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2021, 611: 117975.

[77]
Guo Z Y, Song L H, Xu T T, Gao D W, Li C C, Hu X, Chen G Z. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2019, 226: 338.

[78]
Sun H, Yu X L, Ma X Y, Yang X Q, Lin M Y, Ge M F. Catal. Today, 2020, 355: 580.

[79]
Zhang X D, Zhao Z Y, Zhao S H, Xiang S, Gao W K, Wang L, Xu J C, Wang Y X. J. Catal., 2022, 415: 218.

[80]
Wang L, Sun Y G, Zhu Y B, Zhang J, Ding J, Gao J D, Ji W X, Li Y Y, Wang L Q, Ma Y L. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 622: 577.

[81]
Hu W, Huang J C, Xu J Y, Cheng S, Lyu Y, Xie D, Wang Z Q. Fuel Process. Technol., 2022, 236: 107424.

[82]
Liu W X, Yin R L, Xu X L, Zhang L, Shi W H, Cao X H. Adv. Sci., 2019, 6(12): 1802373.

[83]
Jiang Y W, Gao J H, Zhang Q, Liu Z Y, Fu M L, Wu J L, Hu Y, Ye D Q. Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 371: 78.

[84]
Xu W J, Chen X, Chen J, Jia H P. J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 403: 123869.

[85]
Lei J, Wang P, Wang S, Li J P, Xu Y P, Li S Y. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2022, 52: 1.

[86]
Chen X, Chen X, Cai S C, Yu E Q, Chen J, Jia H P. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 475: 312.

[87]
Wang L D, Li Y L, Liu J, Tian Z X, Jing Y. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2021, 277: 119505.

[88]
Lei J, Wang S, Li J P, Xu Y P, Li S Y. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2022, 251: 117436.

[89]
Zhang Q, Jiang Y W, Gao J H, Fu M L, Zou S B, Li Y X, Ye D Q. Catalysts, 2020, 10(6): 681.

[90]
Hu Z Y, Chen J, Yan D X, Li Y, Jia H P, Lu C Z. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 551: 149453.

[91]
Mao J W, Meng Q, Xu Z H, Xu L S, Fan Z, Zhang G L. Chem. Commun., 2022, 58(98): 13600.

[92]
Zhao J G, Wang P F, Liu C L, Zhao Q, Wang J L, Shi L, Xu G W, Abudula A, Guan G Q. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 629: 706.

[93]
Wang X, Zhao S N, Zhang Y B, Wang Z, Feng J, Song S Y, Zhang H J. Chem. Sci., 2016, 7(2): 1109.

[94]
Yang P, Song X L, Jia C C, Chen H S. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2018, 62: 250.

[95]
Lei J, Wang S, Li J P. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2020, 59(13): 5583.

[96]
Li C Q, Liu X, Wang H B, He Y, Song L Y, Deng Y D, Cai S C, Li S M. Adv. Powder Technol., 2022, 33(1): 103373.

[97]
Chen X, Chen X, Yu E Q, Cai S C, Jia H P, Chen J, Liang P. Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 344: 469.

[98]
Zhang X D, Hou F L, Yang Y, Wang Y X, Liu N, Chen D, Yang Y Q. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 423: 771.

[99]
Zhang X D, Hou F L, Li H X, Yang Y, Wang Y X, Liu N, Yang Y Q. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2018, 259: 211.

[100]
Cui L F, Zhao D, Yang Y, Wang Y X, Zhang X D. J. Solid State Chem., 2017, 247: 168.

[101]
Zhang X D, Li H X, Hou F L, Yang Y, Dong H, Liu N, Wang Y X, Cui L F. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 411: 27.

[102]
Zheng J, Wang Z, Chen Z, Zuo S F. J. Rare Earths, 2021, 39(7): 790.

[103]
Zhang X D, Xiang S, Du Q X, Bi F K, Xie K L, Wang L. Mol. Catal., 2022, 522: 112226.

[104]
Zhao J H, Han W L, Tang Z C, Zhang J Y. Cryst. Growth Des., 2019, 19(11): 6207.

[105]
Zheng Y F, Liu Q L, Shan C P, Su Y, Fu K X, Lu S C, Han R, Song C F, Ji N, Ma D G. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2021, 55(8): 5403.

[106]
Li W W, Gao G Q, Wang L L, Xu H M, Huang W J, Yan N Q, Qu Z. Fuel, 2022, 320: 123983.

[107]
Li Z J, Ma C, Qi M, Li Y L, Qu Y C, Zhang Y, Zhou L L, Yun J. Mol. Catal., 2023, 535: 112857.

[108]
Yang Y Q, Dong H, Wang Y, He C, Wang Y X, Zhang X D. J. Solid State Chem., 2018, 258: 582.

[109]
Jiang T T, Wang X, Chen J Z, Zhang J J, Mai Y L. ChemistrySelect, 2022, 7(29): e202201409.

[110]
Yang S, Qi Z T, Wen Y C, Wang X X, Zhang S H, Li W, Li S J. Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 452: 139657.

[111]
Jiang S L, Li C H, Muhammad Y, Tang Y, Wang R M, Li J J, Li J, Zhao Z X, Zhao Z X. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 328: 122509.

[112]
Dong Y L, Zhao J Y, Zhang J Y, Chen Y, Yang X X, Song W N, Wei L G, Li W. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 388: 124244.

[113]
Li R Z, Zhang L, Zhu S M, Fu S Y, Dong X P, Ida S, Zhang L X, Guo L M. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2020, 602: 117715.

[114]
Liu P, Liao Y X, Li J J, Chen L W, Fu M L, Wu P Q, Zhu R L, Liang X L, Wu T L, Ye D Q. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 594: 713.

[115]
Zhang Z R, Hu G T, Zhao C C, Wei X L, Dou B J, Liang W J, Bin F. Fuel, 2023, 341: 127760.

[116]
Feng C, Jiang F, Xiong G Y, Chen C, Wang Z, Pan Y, Fei Z Y, Lu Y K, Li X B, Zhang R D, Liu Y Q. Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 451: 138868.

[117]
Zhang X D, Bi F K, Zhu Z Q, Yang Y, Zhao S H, Chen J F, Lv X T, Wang Y X, Xu J C, Liu N. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2021, 297: 120393.

Outlines

/