Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Photocatalytic Removal of Antibiotics from Water

  • Jiangbo Yu 1 ,
  • Jing Yu 1 ,
  • Jie Liu 2 ,
  • Zhanchao Wu , 2, * ,
  • Shaoping Kuang , 1, *
Expand
  • 1 School of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
  • 2 School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
* e-mail: (Zhanchao Wu);
(Shaoping Kuang)

Received date: 2023-05-25

  Revised date: 2023-08-19

  Online published: 2023-09-10

Supported by

Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province(2021CXGC011206)

Abstract

With the widespread use of antibiotics, the problem of water pollution caused by antibiotics is becoming increasingly serious. Currently, technologies for removing antibiotic pollutants from water include physical adsorption, flocculation, and chemical oxidation. However, these processes often leave a large amount of chemical reagents and difficult-to-dispose sediment in water, making post-treatment more difficult. Photocatalytic technology uses photocatalytic materials to decompose antibiotics under light, ultimately forming non-toxic CO2 and H2O. Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency and free secondary pollution. In this paper, the research progress of several commonly used photocatalytic materials for degrading antibiotics is reviewed, and their future researches and applications are also prospected.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 the impact of antibiotics in wastewater on The environment and human health

3 Principles of photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics

4 Commonly used photocatalytic materials for antibiotic degradation

4.1 Metal oxide based photocatalyst

4.2 Bi-based photocatalysts

4.3 Photocatalysts based on metal organic frameworks(MOFs)

4.4 Graphite like g-C3N4photocatalyst

5 Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics

5.1 Photocatalytic degradation of TC

5.2 Photocatalytic degradation of CIP

6 Conclusion and outlook

Cite this article

Jiangbo Yu , Jing Yu , Jie Liu , Zhanchao Wu , Shaoping Kuang . Photocatalytic Removal of Antibiotics from Water[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2024 , 36(1) : 95 -105 . DOI: 10.7536/PC230525

1 Introduction

The threat of antibiotic pollutants to water resources is considered to be one of the most serious environmental problems worldwide today. In recent years, the global use of antibiotics has increased dramatically due to the COVID-19 pandemic[1]. Antibiotic pollution not only causes damage to the environment, but also has great potential harm to human health. Antibiotic contaminants are readily soluble in water and have strong mobility. In the traditional water pollution treatment methods, physical methods such as sedimentation, flocculation, coagulation and filtration can not destroy antibiotics, if not treated by other methods, it will cause secondary pollution[2]; The main problems of ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and activated carbon adsorption are membrane fouling, high cost, low stability and poor recovery capacity, which can not fundamentally and completely destroy antibiotics and achieve the goal of complete treatment[3][3,4]. In recent years, photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics has attracted much attention of researchers because of its low cost, high efficiency and environmental friendliness. Most antibiotics are difficult to be decomposed by a single photocatalytic material due to their stable molecular structure. Therefore, by modifying a single photocatalytic material to reduce the band gap width and absorb as much light as possible, and by forming a heterojunction structure with semiconductors with different energy levels and band gap energies, the recombination of carriers can be inhibited to obtain higher photodegradation efficiency, which has become a hot research topic of photocatalysts. In addition, in recent years, there are many studies on the use of antibiotic wastewater to produce hydrogen and the degradation of antibiotic wastewater[5~12].
In 2020, Wei et al. Reviewed the photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic wastewater and hydrogen production, and in 2021, Velempini et al. Reviewed the drug degradation in water mainly from the perspective of metal oxide semiconductor photocatalysts[13][14]. In this paper, the latest research progress of photocatalytic materials for antibiotic degradation from 2022 to 2023 is reviewed, and the impact of antibiotics on the environment and human health and the principle of photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics are briefly introduced.The latest research progress in photodegradation of antibiotics by four different types of photocatalysts, including metal oxide-based photocatalyst, bismuth-based photocatalyst, metal-organic framework (MOFs) -based photocatalyst and graphene-like phase g-C3N4 photocatalyst was reviewed.The research results on the degradation and mineralization of two common antibiotics were reviewed, and the future research and application of photocatalysts were further prospected.

2 Effects of Antibiotics in Wastewater on Environment and Human Health

Antibiotics are natural, synthetic, or semisynthetic compounds that inhibit the growth or metabolic activity of microorganisms. These compounds are bioactive molecules with antibacterial, antifungal, and antiparasitic effects. They are commonly used to treat bacterial infections in humans and animals. They are also used as feed additives or veterinary disease prevention[15]. The common antibiotics are tetracycline (TC), ciprofloxacin (CIP), sulfamethoxazole (SMZ), metronidazole (MTZ) and ceftriaxone (CFX).
Drugs can greatly improve human health and quality of life when used to treat infectious diseases. However, the abuse of drugs, especially antibiotics, can cause serious damage to the environment and human health[14]. Antibiotics may change under the influence of biotic and abiotic factors in the environment, and some antibiotics are not only resistant to natural degradation, but also able to form secondary pollutants larger than the original pollutants by changing their activity. For example, tetracycline can be converted into reversible isomers under appropriate conditions, and Anhydrotetracycline (ATC) can form Epianhydrotetracyclin (EATC), which is much more toxic than tetracycline[16].
In some countries, antibiotics are used not only for animal treatment, but also to accelerate plant growth and increase its yield. Food is not completely digested in animals, so antibiotics may be released from animal manure, which may then be used as fertilizer in agriculture or dumped into wastewater, further harming humans (Figure 1).
图1 日常生活中的抗生素污染物

Fig. 1 Antibiotic pollutants in daily life

3 Principle of Photocatalytic Degradation of Antibiotics

Photocatalysis is a low-cost green technology for organic matter purification (Fig. 2). The photocatalytic process requires the absorption of light of a specific wavelength by a semiconductor (Semi) as a photocatalyst, resulting in the excitation of electron (e) from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) of the photocatalyst, generating a positive hole (h+) in VB, as shown in Equation (1). The hole in VB splits the H2O molecule to produce a hydroxyl radical as shown in formula (2). The electron (e) in CB is captured by oxygen molecules to form superoxide radical as shown in formula (3).
图2 光催化降解抗生素原理

Fig. 2 Principle of photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics

The generated hydroxyl radicals are able to degrade the organic pollutants adsorbed and absorbed on the catalyst surface through a series of steps, resulting in CO2 and H2O as shown in formula (4), as well as other by-products unique to drugs[17]. In some cases, the generated holes have been shown to react directly with pharmaceutical contaminants, generating intermediate products that are ultimately oxidized to CO2 and H2O[18].
$\mathrm{Semi}+\mathrm{hv}\to \mathrm{Semi}(\mathrm{h})_{\mathrm{VB}}^{+}+\mathrm{e}_{\mathrm{CB}}^{-}$
$\mathrm{Semi}(\mathrm{h})_{\mathrm{VB}}^{+}+{{\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{2}}}\mathrm{O}\to \mathrm{Semi}+{{\mathrm{H}}^{+}}+\cdot \mathrm{OH}$
$\mathrm{e}_{\mathrm{CB}}^{-}+{{\mathrm{O}}_{2}}\to \cdot \mathrm{O}_{\mathrm{2}}^{-}$
$\cdot \mathrm{OH}+\mathrm{pharmaceuticals}\to \mathrm{C}{{\mathrm{O}}_{2}}+{{\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{2}}}\mathrm{O}$

4 Commonly used photocatalytic materials for antibiotic degradation

4.1 Metal oxide-based photocatalyst

Metal oxide-based photocatalysts are often used as pristine photocatalysts, or coupled, doped with other substances to promote the degradation of organic pollutants, such as pesticides, dyes, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[19]. In recent years, the application of metal oxide-based photocatalysts in the degradation of antibiotics has attracted more interest and attention of researchers, which have good light absorption ability under ultraviolet, visible light (Vis) or both irradiation, and high biocompatibility, safety and stability under different conditions[20]. However, metal oxides have some defects in photocatalytic activity due to their wide band gap (Fig. 3) and high electron-hole pair recombination rate, so many researchers have studied their various modifications and modifications.
图3 不同半导体的能带隙值[21]

Fig. 3 Energy band gaps of different semiconductors[21]

TiO2 is the most commonly used metal oxide in photocatalysis, and the commonly used crystal structure is anatase, which has an obvious octahedral distortion compared with rutile with four Ti — O bonds. Anatase with two Ti — O bonds is easier to form defects and produce more electrons and holes, which is beneficial to the photocatalytic reaction process. However, the carrier recombination rate of TiO2 is high, and the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 can be effectively improved by using a modifier, which can be cationic or anionic. The introduction of modifiers can affect the stability of anatase phase, particle size, etc., resulting in a narrowing of the band gap and absorption of light in the visible range of the spectrum.
Metal ions can affect the photoactivity of photocatalysts by adjusting the recombination rate. Compared with the pure TiO2 nanotubes, the Au-doped TiO2 nanotubes have a larger specific surface area, and the photocatalytic activity of the Au-TiO2 is enhanced. The enhancement mechanism is mainly due to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSRP) of Au nanoparticles (NPs) under Vis irradiation.Photoexcited electrons and holes were generated, and then high-energy electrons were injected into the conduction band of TiO2 to initiate the photocatalytic reaction. Lincomycin was photocatalytically degraded by nanowires on Au-TiO2 nanotube arrays, and 83% of lincomycin was degraded under Vis irradiation for 20 min[22]. Du et al. Also found that the degradation rate of CIF reached 78.4% within 60 min of Vis irradiation using Ag-doped TiO2 nanotubes[23]. Li et al. Prepared TiO2 nanorods co-doped with gold and silver ions, and found that the rod-like structure of TiO2 not only combined well with cellulose acetate (CA) bulk, but also maintained good crystallinity with CA film and improved porosity[24]. Under Vis irradiation, the degradation of TC reached 80% within 120 min.
Compared with metal ions, nonmetals are not easy to form recombination centers, so they can enhance the photocatalytic activity more effectively. This effect is particularly evident in multicomponent anion doping. For example, C-N-S tri-doped TiO2 material has a large specific surface area, and some Ti atoms in the lattice are replaced by C, so that the network structure of Ti-O-Ti is changed into Ti-O-C, but C atoms can not replace O atoms in the TiO2 lattice.The substitution of S6+ for Ti4+ in the lattice is easier than the substitution of S2− for O2−, and this substitution also helps to reduce the band gap energy of TiO2 by introducing an interband gap and lowering the conduction band,N is substituted to the site of O, the valence band energy level increases, while the band gap energy of TiO2 can be reduced with nitrogen doping. And carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur were added to the TiO2 catalyst, and their electronic structures were changed. It showed good photocatalytic activity for TC decomposition in the Vis range (96%, Vis irradiation in 120 min). The resulting material also degraded other antibiotics well, such as CIF (94%, 150 min Vis irradiation) and chloramphenicol (60%, 150 min Vis irradiation)[25].
ZnO is another semiconductor material. The hexagonal wurtzite structure is the most common structure of ZnO. It is a tetrahedral structure composed of one zinc atom and four oxygen atoms, which is the basis of wurtzite. It has a higher tendency to crystallize in the form of wurtite. It has two lattice parameters, a (0.3296 nm) and C (0.52065 nm), in which 52065 and O2− are alternately arranged along the C axis, forming a hexagonal sublattice pattern. In the actual preparation of ZnO nanomaterials, there are always different numbers and forms of crystal defects in the obtained ZnO, such as oxygen vacancy (Vo), zinc vacancy (VZn), oxo Zn site defects (OZn), etc[26]. ZnO has good quantum efficiency and high photocatalytic efficiency, especially when it is used for photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics at neutral pH. However, the high recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs limits the application of ZnO in photocatalysis. It has been shown that doping ZnO with metals such as Ag or nonmetals such as N and C can enhance the photocatalytic activity for antibiotic degradation[27]. Semiconductor coupling is achieved by forming heterojunctions with semiconductors of different energy levels and band gap energies. Due to their different band structures and energies, the transfer of photoinduced electrons in the coupling photocatalyst can achieve effective charge separation and prolong the lifetime of photogenerated carriers[28]. The absorption threshold of ZnO with wide band gap is 390 nm, and the band gap can be reduced by loading rare earth oxides, forming a heterojunction between the two rare earth oxides, and the interaction between ZnO and CeO2 nanocrystals.The wavelength of the absorbed light is increased, the red is shifted to the Vis region, the utilization rate of the Vis is improved, the degradation efficiency of the antibiotic is further improved, and the mixed solution of ceftriaxone and TC can be degraded at the same time. Because nano-ZnO is not easy to recycle, some scholars have proposed to combine Fe2O3 with ZnO, which proves that Fe2O3 does not affect the photodegradation mediated by ZnO, and can increase the porosity and adsorption performance of nanostructures, so that the overall degradation performance is improved by about 20%[29].
Tungsten oxide (WO3) is an n-type semiconductor photocatalyst, which is chemically stable, non-toxic and has electron storage properties. In addition, WO3 semiconductors contain chemically and photochemically stable photocatalysts, consisting of perovskite units with a band gap of ∼ 2.8 eV, in which the 2 p orbitals of O form the valence band, while the 5d orbitals of W form the conduction band. Compared with the reduction potential of eV vs NHE, WO3 has a more positive (about + 0.5 eV vs NHE) conduction band edge (i.e. O2/O2‾=−0.33 V vs NHE). It has excellent electronic and morphological properties, good stability and photoactivity. Various structures of WO3 have been observed, such as monoclinic, triclinic, orthorhombic, tetragonal, hexagonal, and octahedral cubic, the most common being an octahedral structure with a tungsten atom at the center of each octahedral molecule and oxygen atoms at the corners. Under heat treatment, some W-O bonds are broken, resulting in oxygen molecules leaving the surface lattice and creating oxygen vacancies[30]. One oxygen vacancy in WO3 usually generates two electrons, which reduces the W6+ ion to W5+. However, these vacancies have a positive aspect only if they are found at an optimal concentration in the surface lattice of WO3. Despite the Vis response, pure WO3 faces two major drawbacks: a large carrier recombination rate and a small CB edge position. Since the CB value of WO3 is + 0.5 eV, it is inefficient to carry out the reduction process in any photocatalytic application. This means that the WO3 surface does not generate O2−, or the excited electrons do not have enough potential to carry out the specific reduction process, thus reducing their photocatalytic efficiency.
The purpose of morphology modification is to increase the photocatalytic reaction center and specific surface area by improving the porosity and volume ratio. Various morphologies of WO3 nanocomposites with zero-, one-, two-, and three-dimensional structures have been reported so far, including nanotubes, nanowires, nanorods, nanoplates, square plates, urchin-like, microflower-like, and hollow microspheres. Different nanostructures were prepared by hydrothermal, solvothermal, pulsed laser deposition, anodic oxidation, chemical vapor deposition, sol-gel and electrodeposition methods. Different precursors such as tungsten-chlorine (WCl2, WCl4, WCl5 and WCl6), ammonium tungstate, sodium tungstate were used for the preparation of WO3, providing different morphologies.
Different annealing temperature and reaction time during the synthesis of WO3 can also form different structures. The higher the annealing temperature (up to 600 ℃), the higher the crystallinity, which is beneficial to the transport of electron-hole pairs through the semiconductor. Rong and Wang reported that as the annealing temperature increased from 300 ° C to 550 ° C, the crystallinity of WO3 nanostructures improved and the monoclinic structure integrity was maintained, but the surface area would decrease with the increase of annealing temperature[31].
In addition, compared with WO3, W18O49 is also considered as a photocatalyst with high photocatalytic degradation efficiency, but it is easily oxidized to WO3[32]. It was found that the construction of a mixture of W18O49 and other metal oxides could overcome this oxidation barrier, and they successfully prepared CdS@W18O49 nanotubes in a direct Z-type structure, in which the W18O49 nanotubes acted as a shield to protect the CdS nanoparticles from photocorrosion[33]. Qiao et al. Synthesized a new graphene oxide /W18O49 nanocomposite and used it for photocatalytic degradation of TC pollutants, and the degradation rate can reach 79%[34].

4.2 Bismuth-based photocatalyst

Bismuth is a metal element in the fifth main group of the sixth period of the periodic table, which usually exists in the form of Bi3+. Bismuth-based catalysts are also widely used for photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. Because the 2p orbital of O and the 6s orbital of Bi overlap in the valence band, the lone pair electrons of the 6s orbital of Bi are distorted, and the band gap of bismuth oxides is narrowed, which leads to the migration of photoexcited charges and enhances the Vis response performance[35]. Basically, the band gap of Bi-based photocatalysts is mostly less than 3 eV, and the common band gap values of Bi-based photocatalysts are shown in Figure 4[36].
图4 常见Bi基光催化剂的能带隙值[36]

Fig. 4 Energy band gap value of Bi-based phtotocatalysts [36]

Bismuth groups are often combined with other metal oxides, thus giving new compounds for photocatalysis, such as Bi2WO6, BiVO4, Bi4Ti3O12[37]. Due to the synergistic interaction effect of the two metal cations, these Bi-containing metal oxides have higher photoactivity than Bi-containing single element oxides. The common composite methods include hydrothermal or solvothermal, solid-state reaction, coprecipitation, and sol-gel. Bi2WO6 is an Aurivillius-type oxide, and the morphology, crystallinity, and photocatalytic degradation performance of Bi2WO6 vary with the synthesis conditions, such as pH, temperature, time, and calcination temperature. For example, Huang et al. Recently reported an ultrasonic solvothermal treatment and high temperature calcination method for Bi2WO6 synthesis, indicating that calcination can improve the crystallinity of Bi2WO6[38].
In order to improve the absorption rate of Bi oxides and their oxidation ability, researchers have also proposed to combine Bi oxides with halides to produce bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = F, Cl, Br, I), and obtained the basic indirect band gap value (Fig. 5)[39]. However, pure BiOX is sometimes not ideal for the degradation of TC, oxytetracycline, CIF and doxycycline, so bismuth-based oxygen halides are often doped, co-doped or coupled with metals, metal oxides, diatomite, polymers, etc[40]. Li et al. Successfully prepared the diatomite composite of BiOCl by a simple hydrolysis method. As a carrier, diatomite is actually equivalent to a solid dispersant, which can uniformly fix the BiOCl microspheres on its surface and prevent their aggregation, thus ensuring that more active sites of BiOCl are exposed and promoting the transfer and separation of the photoinduced carrier[41]. The BiOCl composite doped with 60% diatomite has a CIP removal efficiency of 94% within 10 min under simulated sunlight.
图5 BiOX的能带隙值[39]

Fig. 5 Energy band gap value of BiOX[39]

Fang et al. Designed a multifunctional integrated magnetic bentonite/bio/BiOBr-Bi (MB/BiOBr-Bi) to effectively remove antibiotics by using supported carriers and Bi-loaded NPs[42]. As a photocatalyst support, magnetic bentonite (MB) has the function of template, which can transform the original sheet structure of BiOBr into a layered structure. Meanwhile, the negative surface charge and the abundant — OH groups in MB play an important role in the exposure of [001] face and the generation of oxygen vacancies. Based on this layered structure, an appropriate concentration of OVs was uniformly formed on BiOBr in situ by Bi reduction, and the obtained MB/BiOBr-Bi showed good photocatalytic performance, which could effectively degrade 92. 4% of TC within 80 min.

4.3 MOFs-based photocatalyst

MOFs are a new class of coordination polymers that form periodic network structures through self-assembly between metal ions, metal clusters, and organic ligands[43]. MOFs are widely used in photocatalysis due to their high surface area, tunable porosity, and pore volume[44]. And using functional group modification, a highly porous structure with significant surface area can be obtained by adjusting the surface structure[45]. To maximize the photocatalytic efficiency, scientific researchers have conducted various studies on MOFs (Fig. 6).
图6 基于MOFs的光催化剂[51]

Fig. 6 Photocatalysts based on MOFs[51]

The construction of heterojunction is very favorable for improving the photocatalytic efficiency of MOFs. It not only promotes the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, but also increases the absorption of light by other materials constituting the heterojunction to generate more free electrons and holes and provide more reaction sites[46]. Many materials are combined with MOFs to construct heterojunctions, including metal oxides, metal sulfides, metal salts, inorganic nonmetallic compounds, organic compounds, and hydrotalcite. For example, Liu et al. Fabricated ZnO/ZIF-9 using the sonic crystal method, in which the type II heterojunction promoted the separation of hole-electron pairs, and the TC degradation rate was increased by two times compared with single ZIF-9[47]. In the experiment of Chen et al., organic polyaniline (PANI) was used to construct the Z-type heterojunction MIL-100 (Fe)/PANI by ball milling, and the band edge of MIL-100 (Fe)/PANI composite also had a slight red shift, from 2.77 eV of single MIL-100Fe to 2.47, 2.41, 2.34 and 2.29 eV of MP3%, MP5%, MP7% and MP9%, respectively[48]. The relatively narrow band gap energy of MIL-100 (Fe)/PANI composite may be due to the strong interaction between the hybrid structure formed between MIL-100 (Fe) and PANI, which can make more effective use of white light degradation. Through the construction of heterojunction, the degradation rate of TC in this material is improved by 46%. In addition, Abazari et al. Applied hydrotalcite to the construction of MOFs-based heterojunction materials and used for the photocatalytic degradation of SMZ. The excellent photocatalytic performance of the composite may be due to the synergistic effect of Ni-Ti LDH and Zn-TMU-5, resulting in increased absorption of sunlight, effective separation of photoinduced carriers, and rapid charge transfer to the reaction sites and conduction band potential of Ni-Ti LDH and Zn-TMU-5[49]. In addition, the Zn-TMU-5 @ Ni-Ti LDH composite can be reused for 5 times, showing good repeatability. The formation of OH radicals on the Zn-TMU-5 @ 30% Ni-Ti LDH complex was confirmed in the photoluminescence (PL) spectra using a terephthalic acid probe. The ternary heterojunction CuWO4/Bi2S3/ZIF-67 prepared by Askari et al. Has good degradation efficiency for MTZ and CFX (95.6% and 90.1% under 80 min illumination)[50].
Due to their multi-component and tunable structure, MOFs materials are often used as templates to prepare photocatalysts with better composition, morphology and structure. Similarly, Hariganesh et al. Achieved good conductivity by calcining a composite product of MIL-101 (Cr) and Cu(NO32 to obtain a CuCr2O4/CuO with the same morphology as MIL-101 (Cr)[52].
For a long time, the recycling problem of photocatalyst has limited its practical application. Many researchers have loaded Fe3O4 on photocatalytic materials to make them magnetic, which is convenient for later recycling. Li et al. Produced a composite of MIL-100 (Fe) and Fe3O4, which not only generated a heterojunction structure, but also led to magnetism in the composite. Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) showed superparamagnetic characteristics, with saturation magnetization values of 71.8 and 15.1 emu/G, respectively, and found that the diclofenac (DCF) degradation process of eight photoproducts started from hydroxylation[53].

4.4 Graphite-like phase g-C3N4 photocatalyst

The g-C3N4 is composed of triazine units connected by van der Waals force between the layers, and the g-C3N4 with two basic structural units of triazine ring and heptazine ring is the most stable under natural conditions, and the presence of hydrogen atoms at the terminal edge leads to a large number of surface defects and enhanced electron delocalization, resulting in photocatalysis. The band gap of g-C3N4 is about 2.7 eV, when given light, on the N site, the photogenerated hole is formed, on the CB, the electron is accessible, the π-π conjugated structure of graphite phase g-C3N4 can rapidly and directionally transport and separate the photogenerated electron-hole, reduce the recombination of carriers, and improve the photocatalytic ability[54]. g-C3N4 can also be used for photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic pollutants under Vis. However, pure g-C3N4 has some problems, such as insufficient use of Vis, insufficient surface area, fast recombination of electron and hole pairs of carriers, and low conductivity[55].
According to the latest research, doping g-C3N4 with metal or nonmetal can improve its photocatalytic activity, and doping is considered to be an effective and suitable method to improve the photocatalytic ability of g-C3N4 by modifying its electronic skeleton and band gap.Because the doped photocatalyst can create a new energy level between the valence band and the conduction band to improve the photocatalytic performance, these metals or nonmetals as dopants contribute to electron aggregation and reduce e and h+ recombination[56][57]. Wang et al. Synthesized a variety of new composite materials (g-C3N4) doped with Cu) by double-pot hydrothermal technique to remove TC from wastewater through the synergistic effect of photocatalytic degradation and adsorption[58]. Compared with the pure g-C3N4 photocatalyst, the composite of Cu/g-C3N4 has better adsorption and photocatalytic activity. Under Vis irradiation, the degradation rate of 50 mg/L TC by the synthesized catalyst was nearly 99% in 30 min under the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis. In addition, the most effective reactive groups in the photocatalytic process are oxygen and hydrogen radicals. After 5 cycles, the Cu/g-C3N4 showed great stability and repeatability. Electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding and surface complexation between copper ions and amino groups are the main reasons for the enhancement of adsorption capacity. It is also found that doping can expand the range of absorption wavelength, while pure g-C3N4 can only absorb blue light. g-C3N4 is an excellent substrate for metal ion dispersion without obvious agglomeration due to metal doping, and the abundant amine groups provide better compatibility for the combination of metal nanoparticles, reduce the area of metal nanoparticles, and improve the stability. In terms of cost, doping with nonmetals is a feasible and effective way to improve the Vis absorption ability of g-C3N4, carrier flexibility, and simplify the separation of photogenerated e and h+ pairs while maintaining a metal-free structure[59]. Viet et al. Studied the preparation of Ag-doped g-C3N4 that could efficiently decompose oxytetracycline, and actually, the band gap was reduced from 2.71 eV to 2.46 eV after doping Ag on g-C3N4, which improved the photocatalytic activity by delaying the recombination of photoinduced e and h+ coupling[60]. In addition, the researchers found that doping with noble metal ions optimized the photocatalytic performance due to the superior electron trapping ability of noble metal ions and the higher separation of photogenerated electrons and holes[61].
Zhang et al. Prepared a Z-structured Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 composite and loaded it on activated carbon fiber membrane (ACF) to degrade chlortetracycline, and the degradation rate could reach 90.2%[62]. After the two materials are combined, the photogenerated electron e excited by light on the CB of Bi2WO6 is transferred to the VB of g-C3N4 and combines with the hole h+ on the VB of g-C3N4, which prolongs the existence time of photogenerated carriers. And g-C3N4 has a relatively small CB, which can more effectively reduce the adsorption of O2 on the surface and produce more superoxide radical ·O2-. In addition, some researchers synthesized a novel S-type heterojunction g-C3N4/Mn(VO3)2 composite photocatalyst with a layered structure by microwave hydrothermal method, and the results showed that the photocatalyst with a doping ratio of 1/2.75-g-C3N4/Mn(VO3)2 showed the best photocatalytic ability and excellent stability in the degradation of SMX, and the degradation efficiency reached 87.3% at 110 min, which was 11 and 14 times higher than that of g-C3N4 and Mn(VO3)2, respectively[63]. Zhang et al. Prepared novel Ag3PO4/g-C3N4/MoSe2 ternary composites by in situ synthesis[64]. Compared with the single Ag3PO4, the Ag3PO4/g-C3N4/MoSe2 ternary photocatalyst showed excellent visible light response degradation performance for CIP and TC.

5 Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics

5.1 Photocatalytic degradation of TC

TC is a series of broad-spectrum antibiotics first introduced in 1940, and its structure is shown in Figure 7 a[65,66]. Despite its important role in medicine, the presence of TC in the aqueous phase has attracted much attention due to its ecological impact, including carcinogenicity and toxicity to the environment[67,68].
图7 TC和CIP结构图[65,66]

Fig. 7 Structure diagrams of TC and CIP[65,66]

In the past few years, many studies have been reported on the removal or degradation of TC by using different photocatalytic materials[69]. For example, Chen et al. Synthesized a novel heterostructured photocatalyst AgI/BiVO4 by in situ precipitation method, which showed excellent photoactivity for TC decomposition under visible light irradiation, and TC molecules were obviously eliminated within 60 min (94.91%), and the degradation efficiency was significantly better than that of BiVO4(62.68%) and AgI alone (75.43%) under the same experimental conditions[70]. Wang et al. Proposed a novel fabrication method of TiO2/g-C3N4 core-shell quantum heterojunction, which adopted a feasible strategy of polymerizing quantum mutagenesis graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) on the surface of anatase titanium dioxide nanosheets[71]. It was used as a TC degradation photocatalyst, and the catalyst exhibited the highest TC degradation rate of 2.2 mg/min, which was 36% higher than that of the TiO2/g-C3N4 mixture, 2 times higher than that of TiO2, and 2.3 times higher than bulk g-C3N4. Wang et al. Successfully prepared 3D polymeric carbon nitride foam (CNF) with large surface area and mesoporous structure by using the bubble template effect of decomposition of ammonium chloride during thermal condensation[5]. Its degradation of TC-HCl showed the highest removal rate of 78.9% in natural seawater, followed by reservoir water (75.0%), tap water (62.3%), deionized water (49.8%), reverse osmosis concentrate (32.7%) and then pharmaceutical wastewater (18.9%). Chen et al. Successfully synthesized aromatic ring-terminated g-C3N4 nanosheets via copolymerization of urea and quinazoline-2,4 diamine (DQ)[7]. ARCNS-3 can significantly improve the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution ability driven by visible light, and simultaneously purify wastewater (1021μmol·h−1·g−1 with TC degradation of 100%), which is much higher than that of CNS(325μmol·h−1·g−1 with TC degradation of 48%). Moreover, the mineralization rate of tetracycline for ARCNS-3 reached 92.1%, which was much better than that of CNS (18%). Jiang et al. Designed and synthesized an advanced and stable visible-light-driven (Bi) BiOBr/rGO photocatalyst for TC degradation, achieving > 98% removal within 20 min[72]. The stability of the photocatalyst was confirmed by continuous photocatalytic operation for 50 H. In the continuous flow configuration, almost 100% TC removal rate can be maintained for about 10 H (Fig. 8). Liu et al. Successfully synthesized sulfur and selenium co-doped graphitic carbon nitride (SSCN) by synchronously introducing sulfur and selenium atoms into the structure of g-C3N4[56]. Due to the introduction of sulfur and selenium, the asymmetric structure of SSCN not only maintains the π-π * electronic transition, but also initiates the n-π * electronic transition in g-C3N4. SSCN-50 showed the best photocatalytic performance with 78.0% and 99.4% degradation of antibiotics (TC) and organic dye (RhB), which were 2.5 and 16.8 times higher than that of g-C3N4, respectively. Li et al. Have successfully prepared hollow flower-like microsphere S-type heterojunction In2Se3/Ag3PO4 with unique nanoheterostructure, energy band structure and chemical bond interface, which can significantly improve the photocatalytic activity of TC degradation and produce hydrogen at the same time, and this improvement in performance is mainly attributed to the hollow structure and S-type heterojunction[12].
图8 TC可能的降解途径[72]

Fig. 8 Possible degradation pathways of TC[72]

5.2 Photocatalytic Degradation of CIP

CIP is a second-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic used to kill bacteria to prevent serious infections[73]. The chemical structure of CIP is shown in Figure 7B[1]. CIP accounts for 73% of total consumption and has a broad antimicrobial spectrum, affecting DNA polymerase and topoisomerase IV of various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, thereby preventing cell replication[74,75]. However, the existence of CIP limits the photosynthetic pathway of higher plants and even leads to morphological deformities, and it can also cause serious damage to human health[74]. Various studies have reported the use of modified photocatalysts to improve the photocatalytic degradation CIP efficiency[76].
Pattnaik et al. Employed exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalytic degradation of CIP under solar radiation, and the catalytic data showed that g-C3N4 enhanced the photocatalytic activity after exfoliation due to its efficient charge separation, low recombination of photogenerated carriers, and high surface area[77]. They found that 1 G/L of exfoliated nano g-C3N4 can degrade 78% of a 20 ppm solution after continuous exposure to sunlight for 1 H. Malakootian et al. Prepared a new Z-type CeO2-Ag/AgBr photocatalyst using AgBr in situ void on CeO2 for the subsequent photoreduction process[73]. Due to the faster interfacial charge transfer process, the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs is greatly enhanced, and as a result, the photodegradation of CIP under visible light irradiation also shows greatly enhanced photocatalytic activity.
Shao et al. Used a modified solvothermal strategy to prepare a novel 2D/1D Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanosheet /Nb2O5 nanofiber S-type heterojunction photocatalyst[8]. The optimized catalyst Cd0.5Zn0.5S/20%Nb2O5( named CZSNO20) exhibited excellent hydrogen evolution rate (94μmol·g−1·h−1) while degrading antibiotics such as CIP and CPX. Zhang et al. Fabricated a novel and unique composite Z-shaped Ag3PO4@MoS2 by uniformly fixing MoS2 nanosheets on the surface of a Ag3PO4 cube with abundant oxygen vacancies[6]. The degradation efficiency of CIP by the optimized Ag3PO4@MoS2 composite was 91.7%. The catalytic degradation of antibiotics to recover hydrogen is shown in Figure 9[12].
图9 Z型Ag3PO4@MoS2体系从抗生素中光催化回收氢[6]

Fig. 9 Z-scheme Ag3PO4@MoS2 system for photocatalytic recovery of hydrogen from antibiotics[6]

Finally, we compared the different photocatalysts discussed above, which are listed in Table 1. Most of the catalysts can easily and effectively remove antibiotic pollutants within 2 H, with relatively high degradation efficiency, which fully demonstrates the superiority of photodegradation for rapid and effective removal of antibiotics.
表1 不同催化剂降解抗生素及其降解效果

Table 1 Degradation of antibiotics with different catalysts and their degradation effects

Antibiotic Photocatalyst Result Degradation mechanism ref
TC Heterogeneous TiO2/g-C3N4 100 mg TiO2/g-C3N4 can decompose 20 mg tetracycline (2.2 mg/min) within 9 min Co action of ·O2 and h+ 71
TC Heterogeneous AgI/BiVO4 The degradation rate of TC within 70 min is 94.91% Co action of ·OH,·O2 and h+ 70
TC 3D polymerized carbon nitride foam TC degradation rate in 70 min seawater 78.9% Co action of ·O2 and h+ 5
TC ARCNS-3 TC degradation rate within 5 h is 100% Inhibition of photogenerated electrons and free radical intermediates by aromatic rings 7
TC S-scheme In2Se3/Ag3PO4 1 h TC degradation rate 93.1% Co action of ·OH,·O2 and h+ 12
TC (Bi)BiOBr/rGO 20 min degradation rate 98% Co action of ·O2 and h+ 43
CIP CuO:Zn The degradation rate of CIP within 240 min is 94.6% Synergistic effect of ·OH and h+ 76
CIP Flaky peeling g-C3N4 The degradation rate of CIP within 60 min is 78% Co action of ·O2 and h+ 77
CIP CZSNO20 The degradation rate of CIP in 60 minutes is nearly 83% Co action of e, h+,·OH and ·O2 8
CIP Z-scheme Ag3PO4 @MoS2 The degradation rate of CIP within 2 h reached 91.7% Co action of ·OH,·O2 and h+ 6

6 Conclusion and prospect

The widespread use and excessive use of antibiotics will not only cause damage to the environment, but also have great potential harm to human health. Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency and environmental protection. The mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics mainly depends on the formation of free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Four kinds of common photocatalysts including semiconductor metal oxide photocatalyst, bismuth-based photocatalyst, MOFs-based photocatalyst and graphite-like phase g-C3N4 photocatalyst and the latest research results of their modification were introduced in detail. The research on the modification of photocatalyst mainly focuses on: (1) improving the dispersion of photocatalyst in aqueous solution and increasing the ability of drug adsorption and desorption on its surface; (2) the method for constructing the heterojunction enables the photocatalyst to have a proper band gap, widens the light absorption range of the photocatalyst, inhibits the recombination of electron-hole pairs, and improves the photocatalytic effect; And (3) that recovery and reuse of the photocatalyst from wat are realized, the utilization rate of the photocatalyst is improve, and the secondary pollution is reduced.
However, with the widespread use of antibiotics, the types of antibiotics are becoming more and more abundant, and different types of antibiotics have different structural characteristics. Due to the different VB of photocatalysts, whether the photogenerated holes can be directly oxidized in the photocatalytic process is further explored through the trapping experiment of free radicals. In addition, there are many intermediates produced in the photodegradation process, so it is very important to analyze their structure and toxicity, and to judge the mineralization degree by measuring their total organic carbon (TOC) content, to understand the detailed process of photocatalytic degradation, and to further explore its degradation mechanism, so as to improve the degradation efficiency of antibiotics.
[1]
Chen Z L, Guo J S, Jiang Y X, Shao Y. Environ. Sci. Eur., 2021, 33(1): 1.

[2]
Akerdi A G, Bahrami S H. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7(5): 103283.

[3]
de Souza D I, Dottein E M, Giacobbo A, Siqueira Rodrigues M A, de Pinho M N, Bernardes A M. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6(5): 6147.

[4]
Jaria G, Lourenço M A O, Silva C P, Ferreira P, Otero M, Calisto V, Esteves V I. J. Mol. Liq., 2020, 299: 112098.

[5]
Wang H, Wu Y, Feng M B, Tu W G, Xiao T, Xiong T, Ang H X, Yuan X Z, Chew J W. Water Res., 2018, 144: 215.

[6]
Zhang S Q, Hu G H, Chen M X, Li B, Dai W L, Deng F, Yang L X, Zou J P, Luo S L. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2023, 330: 122584.

[7]
Chen Z H, Li S S, Peng Y N, Hu C. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2020, 10(16): 5470.

[8]
Shao X L, Wang K, Peng L J, Li K, Wen H Z, Le X Y, Wu X H, Wang G H. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2022, 652: 129846.

[9]
Wei Z D, Liu J Y, Fang W J, Xu M Q, Qin Z, Jiang Z, Shangguan W F. Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 358: 944.

[10]
Wu Y Y, Li Y Q, Hu H J, Zeng G S, Li C H. ACS EST Eng., 2021, 1(3): 603.

[11]
Arun J, Shriniti V, Shyam S, Priyadharsini P, Gopinath K P, Sivaramakrishnan R, Thuy Lan Chi N, Pugazhendhi A. Fuel, 2023, 340: 127471.

[12]
Li L W, Feng H G, Dong Z B, Yang T T, Xue S L. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 649: 10.

[13]
Wei Z D, Liu J Y, Shangguan W F. Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41(10): 1440.

[14]
Velempini T, Prabakaran E, Pillay K. Mater. Today Chem., 2021, 19: 100380.

[15]
Kovalakova P, Cizmas L, McDonald T J, Marsalek B, Feng M B, Sharma V K. Chemosphere, 2020, 251: 126351.

[16]
Kühne M, Hamscher G, Körner U, Schedl D, Wenzel S. Food Chem., 2001, 75(4): 423.

[17]
Romeiro A, Freitas D, Emília Azenha M, Canle M, Burrows H D. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2017, 16(6): 935.

[18]
Chen X Y, Yao J J, Xia B, Gan J Y, Gao N Y, Zhang Z. J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 383: 121220.

[19]
Djurišić A B, He Y L, Ng A M C. APL Mater., 2020, 8(3): 030903.

[20]
Soni V, Khosla A, Singh P, Nguyen V H, Van Le Q, Selvasembian R, Hussain C M, Thakur S, Raizada P. J. Environ. Manag., 2022, 308: 114617.

[21]
Haque F, Daeneke T, Kalantar-zadeh K, Ou J Z. Nano Micro Lett., 2018, 10(2): 1.

[22]
Do T C M V, Nguyen D Q, Nguyen K T, Le P H. Materials, 2019, 12(15): 2434.

[23]
Du J G, Ma S L, Yan Y H, Li K, Zhao F Y, Zhou J G. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2019, 572: 237.

[24]
Li W L, Li B R, Meng M J, Cui Y H, Wu Y L, Zhang Y L, Dong H J, Feng Y H. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 487: 1008.

[25]
Lan N T, Anh V H, An H D, Hung N P, Nhiem D N, Van Thang B, Lieu P K, Khieu D Q. J. Nanomater., 2020, 2020: 1.

[26]
Serrà A, Zhang Y, Sepúlveda B, Gómez E, Nogués J, Michler J, Philippe L. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2019, 248: 129.

[27]
Mirzaeifard Z, Shariatinia Z, Jourshabani M, Rezaei Darvishi S M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2020, 59(36): 15894.

[28]
Mardikar S P, Kulkarni S, Adhyapak P V. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, 8(2): 102788.

[29]
Semeraro P, Bettini S, Sawalha S, Pal S, Licciulli A, Marzo F, Lovergine N, Valli L, Giancane G. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(8): 1458.

[30]
Molina Higgins M C, Hall H, Rojas J V. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 2021, 409: 113138.

[31]
Rong R C, Wang L M. J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 850: 156742.

[32]
Shurbaji S, Huong P T, Altahtamouni T M. Catalysts, 2021, 11(4): 437.

[33]
Yang Y R, Qiu M, Chen F Y, Qi Q, Yan G M, Liu L, Liu Y F. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 541: 148415.

[34]
Qiao D S, Qu X, Chen X Y, Sun B J, Ding W X, Chen C T, Peng X H, Sun D P. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 619: 156630.

[35]
Chen P, Zhang Q X, Zheng X S, Tan C W, Zhuo M H, Chen T S, Wang F L, Liu H J, Liu Y, Feng Y P, Lv W Y, Liu G G. J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 384: 121443.

[36]
Fang W J, Shangguan W F. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2019, 44(2): 895.

[37]
Sivakumar R, Lee N Y. Chemosphere, 2022, 297: 134227.

[38]
Huang C, Chen L L, Li H P, Mu Y G, Yang Z G. RSC Adv., 2019, 9(48): 27768.

[39]
Ganose A M, Cuff M, Butler K T, Walsh A, Scanlon D O. Chem. Mater., 2016, 28(7): 1980.

[40]
Kandi D, Behera A, Sahoo S, Parida K. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 253: 117523.

[41]
Jia Z H, Li T, Zheng Z F, Zhang J D, Liu J X, Li R, Wang Y W, Zhang X C, Wang Y F, Fan C M. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 380: 122422.

[42]
Fang W L, Wang L, Meng X C, Li C H. J. Alloys Compd., 2023, 947: 169606.

[43]
Du C Y, Zhang Z, Yu G L, Wu H P, Chen H, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Su Y H, Tan S Y, Yang L, Song J H, Wang S T. Chemosphere, 2021, 272: 129501.

[44]
Zhang H, Sun R, Li D C, Dou J M. Chin. J. Struc. Chem. 2022, 41, 2211071.

[45]
Zhang J W, Xiang S, Wu P, Wang D Q, Lu S Y, Wang S L, Gong F J, Wei X Q, Ye X S, Ding P. Sci. Total Environ., 2022, 811: 152351.

[46]
Gao Y X, Lu J, Xia J, Yu G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(11): 12706.

[47]
Liu N N, Shang Q G, Gao K, Cheng Q R, Pan Z Q. New J. Chem., 2020, 44(16): 6384.

[48]
Chen D D, Yi X H, Zhao C, Fu H F, Wang P, Wang C C. Chemosphere, 2020, 245: 125659.

[49]
Abazari R, Morsali A, Dubal D P. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2020, 7(12): 2287.

[50]
Askari N, Beheshti M, Mowla D, Farhadian M. Chemosphere, 2020, 251: 126453.

[51]
Du C Y, Zhang Z, Yu G L, Wu H P, Chen H, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Su Y H, Tan S Y, Yang L, Song J H, Wang S T. Chemosphere, 2021, 272: 129501.

[52]
Hariganesh S, Vadivel S, Maruthamani D, Kumaravel M, Paul B, Balasubramanian N, Vijayaraghavan T. Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2020, 34(2): e5365.

[53]
Li S J, Cui J N, Wu X, Zhang X, Hu Q, Hou X H. J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 373: 408.

[54]
Jiang R R, Lu G H, Zhou R R, Yang H H, Yan Z H, Wu D H, Liu J C, Nkoom M. J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 820: 153166.

[55]
Alaghmandfard A, Ghandi K. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(2): 294.

[56]
Liu T, Li Y, Sun H, Zhang M, Xia Z, Yang Q. Chin. J. Struc. Chem. 2022, 41:2206055.

[57]
Yang C, Yang J, Liu S S, Zhao M X, Duan X, Wu H L, Liu L, Liu W Z, Li J L, Ren S, Liu Q C. J. Environ. Manag., 2023, 335: 117608.

[58]
Wang H J, Zhang J, Wang P, Yin L L, Tian Y, Li J J. Chinese Chem. Lett., 2020, 31:2789.

[59]
Luo S H, Zhang C, Almatrafi E, Yan M, Liu Y, Fu Y K, Wang Z W, Li L, Zhou C Y, Xu P, Liu Z F, Zeng G M. Appl. Mater. Today, 2021, 24: 101118.

[60]
Viet N M, Trung D Q, Giang B L, Le Minh Tri N, Thao P, Pham T H, Kamand F Z, Al Tahtamouni T M. J. Water Process. Eng., 2019, 32: 100954.

[61]
Pattanayak D S, Pal D, Mishra J, Thakur C. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2023, 30(10): 25546.

[62]
Zhang R, Jiang J C, Zeng K L. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2022, 140: 109418.

[63]
Xu L Y, Dai R, Yang J, Yan J F, Zhang Y Y, Dai Y, Liao C G, Zhang Z Y, Zhao W, Lei X Y, Zhang F C, Zhang H. J. Alloys Compd., 2023, 936: 168163.

[64]
Zhang H, Tang G G, Wan X, Xu J, Tang H. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 530: 147234.

[65]
Abdurahman M H, Abdullah A Z, Shoparwe N F. Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 413: 127412.

[66]
Chopra I, Roberts M. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 2001, 65(2): 232.

[67]
Tettey M, Sereboe L, Edwin F, Frimpong-Boateng K. Ghana Med J, 2005, 39, 128.

[68]
Daghrir R, Drogui P. Environ. Chem. Lett., 2013, 11(3): 209.

[69]
Wang P H, Yap P S, Lim T T. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2011, 399(1/2): 252.

[70]
Chen F, Yang Q, Sun J, Yao F B, Wang S N, Wang Y L, Wang X L, Li X M, Niu C G, Wang D B, Zeng G M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(48): 32887.

[71]
Wang W, Fang J J, Shao S F, Lai M, Lu C H. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2017, 217: 57.

[72]
Jiang H L, Wang Q, Chen P H, Zheng H T, Shi J W, Shu H Y, Liu Y B. J. Clean. Prod., 2022, 339: 130771.

[73]
Malakootian M, Nasiri A, Amiri Gharaghani M. Chem. Eng. Commun., 2020, 207(1): 56.

[74]
Campoli-Richards D M, Monk J P, Price A, Benfield P, Todd P A, Ward A. Drugs, 1988, 35(4): 373.

[75]
Fief C A, Hoang K G, Phipps S D, Wallace J L, Deweese J E. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(2): 4049.

[76]
Yu X J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Niu J F, Zhao J, Wei Y C, Yao B H. Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 374: 316.

[77]
Pattnaik S P, Behera A, Martha S, Acharya R, Parida K. J. Mater. Sci., 2019, 54(7): 5726.

Outlines

/