Home Journals Progress in Chemistry
Progress in Chemistry

Abbreviation (ISO4): Prog Chem      Editor in chief: Jincai ZHAO

About  /  Aim & scope  /  Editorial board  /  Indexed  /  Contact  / 
Review

Synthetic Strategies of Chemically Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks

  • Mengrui Yang ,
  • Yuxin Xie ,
  • Dunru Zhu , *
Expand
  • College of Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials-oriented Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
* Corresponding author e-mail:

Received date: 2022-11-17

  Revised date: 2023-03-01

  Online published: 2023-04-30

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(21476115)

Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX23_1472)

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new generation of crystalline porous materials with void space structures constructed from metal ions or clusters and organic ligands through coordination bonds, and have been a hot research topic in the field of coordination chemistry over the past two decades. As the novel multifunctional materials, MOFs have been widely used in various fields due to their high porosities, low densities, large surface areas, tunable pore sizes, diverse topological structures and tailorabilities. Although MOFs have many advantages, most of MOFs materials have relatively lower water and chemical stability and cannot maintain their structures under harsh conditions, which greatly restrict their practical applications under moisture-rich conditions. Therefore, chemically stable MOFs materials will have greater application prospects. In recent years, researchers have carried out a lot of exploration in improving the chemical stability of MOFs, and developed some excellent methods to synthesize chemically stable MOFs. This review will mainly focus on the latest research progress in the syntheses of chemically stable MOFs during the past five years.

Contents

1 Introduction

2 Synthetic strategies of chemically stable MOFs

2.1 Increase the strength of coordination bonds

2.2 Attaching hydrophobic groups onto the linker

2.3 Using pore-partioning ligands for the pore space partition

2.4 Post-synthetic exchange method

2.5 Hydrophobic surface treatment

2.6 Other methods

3 Conclusion and Outlook

Cite this article

Mengrui Yang , Yuxin Xie , Dunru Zhu . Synthetic Strategies of Chemically Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2023 , 35(5) : 683 -698 . DOI: 10.7536/PC221112

1 Introduction

Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), are coordination polymers (or coordination networks) with potentially pore-open frameworks. It is mainly formed by the self-assembly of metal ions or metal clusters and organic ligands through coordination bonds, which has been developed very rapidly in recent decades. Compared with traditional inorganic porous materials, MOFs have the advantages of ultra-high porosity, high specific surface area, adjustable pore size and modifiable pore channels, which make them have great application prospects in gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, proton conduction, drug delivery and so on[1~3][4][5,6][7][8]. Early MOFs were constructed by divalent metal cations (Zn2+, Cu2+) with carboxylic acid ligands, such as MOF-5 constructed by terephthalic acid (H2BDC) and transition metal Zn2+, which was reported by Yaghi et al. In 1999 and has a 3D cubic framework structure[9]. In the same year, Williams et al. Reported a 3D MOF with face-centered cubic topology, named HKUST-1 (HKUST = Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), constructed by trimesic acid (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) and transition metal Cu2+[10]. However, the coordination bond formed between the divalent metal cation and the carboxylate ligand is unstable and will gradually decompose when it meets water[11]. However, most of the practical application environments contain water, acid, base or coordination anions. Because of the relatively low chemical stability of many MOFs, they can not exist stably in these environments, which hinders the further application of MOFs. Therefore, it is of great significance to construct chemically stable MOFs[12]. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), gas adsorption and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) are commonly used to characterize the stability of MOF framework. PXRD can determine the crystallinity or long-range ordered structure of MOF, gas adsorption can determine the pore properties (specific surface area and pore size) of MOF, and TGA will determine the thermal decomposition temperature of the framework.
As the stability of MOFs has attracted more and more attention, researchers have begun to study the reasons for the instability of MOFs, and have synthesized many MOFs that are stable in different environments, such as MIL-100, MIL-101, ZIF-8, UiO-66, etc. (Table 1)[12~16][17][18][19][20]. In 2009, Willis et al tested the effect of water on MOFs through experiments, and found that the stability of MOFs is related to metal ions, ligands, coordination environment, geometric structure, surface hydrophobicity, steric hindrance and other factors.To this end, researchers have proposed methods to stabilize MOFs, such as improving the strength of coordination bonds, post-synthesis exchange (metal ions or ligands), inserting hydrophobic groups, inserting pore segmentation ligands, and surface hydrophobic modification, based on which a large number of chemically stable MOFs have been synthesized[21][22]. In this paper, the design and synthesis strategies of chemically stabilized MOFs in the past five years and their recent progress are reviewed.
表1 早期稳定的MOFs比较

Table 1 Comparison of some stable MOFs in the early stages

MOF Linker SBU Dimension Chemical stability Characterization ref
MIL-100(Cr) H3BTC Cr3O 3D water (RT): 12 months PXRD 17
MIL-101(Cr) H2BDC Cr3O 3D boiling water: 7 d; pH = 0~12 (RT): 2 months PXRD
N2 adsorption
18
ZIF-8 MeIMa) [ZnN4] 3D boiling water: 7 d; 8 M NaOH (100 ℃):
1 d
PXRD 19
UiO-66 H2BDC [Zr6O4(OH)4(CO2)12] 3D pH = 1~14: 2 h PXRD
N2 adsorption
20
MIL-53(Cr) H2BDC [CrO4(OH)2] 3D 0.07 M HCl or NaOH (RT): 2 d PXRD 31

a) MeIM = 2-Methylimidazolate

2 Synthetic strategy

2.1 Enhanced coordination bond

It is well known that the coordination bond between metal and ligand is an important factor in determining the stability of MOFs; therefore, stable MOFs can be constructed by improving the strength of the metal – coordination bond. In Pearson's HSAB (Hard/Soft Acid/Base) theory, acids and bases are classified as "Hard" and "Soft" respectively, in which hard acids and hard bases, soft acids and soft bases can form stronger coordination bonds (Figure 1). According to this principle, more stable MOFs can be designed and synthesized by reasonably selecting metal ions and organic ligands.
图1 基于HSAB理论构筑稳定MOFs的策略[12]

Fig. 1 Strategies to construct stable MOFs guided by HSAB theory[12]. Copyright 2018, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

2.1.1 Stable MOFs Constructed by Low-Valent Metal Ion

Low-valent transition metal ions (Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Fe2+, and Ag+, etc.) are soft acids, which can coordinate with N-heterocyclic ligands (imidazole, pyrazole, triazole, tetrazole, etc.) of soft bases to construct stable MOFs[11]. The pKa of N-heterocyclic ligands is generally higher than that of carboxylic acid ligands, and the affinity of N-heterocyclic ligands to low-valent transition metal ions is stronger, so the synthesized MOFs can exist stably in water/alkaline solution[14,23]. In 2006, Yaghi et al. Reported 12 MOFs with zeolite topology formed by imidazole ligands modified by different functional groups and Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework s or Co2+, named ZIFs (Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework s), in which ZIF-8 can exist in boiling water for 7 days, and the structure can also be maintained in 8 M NaOH solution at 100 ℃ for 1 day. ZIF-68, ZIF-69 and ZIF-70 reported in 2008 also have similar stability, immersed in boiling benzene, methanol and water[19][24]. In 2019, Huang et al., using a ligand containing imidazole and pyridine groups, 2- (1H-2-imidazolyl) -3H-imidazo [4,5-c] pyridine (Metal Azolate Framework), synthesized a new MOF: Zn (imPim) (named MAF-stu-1, MAF = Metal Azolate Framework),The thermal stability of Zn (imPim) is as high as 680 ℃ in nitrogen atmosphere, and its structure remains unchanged after soaking in boiling water for 9 days, and its PXRD pattern also remains unchanged after soaking in aqueous solution with pH = 2 ~ 13 and common organic solvents for 3 days at room temperature, which proves that Zn (imPim) has excellent chemical stability[25].
In addition to imidazole ligands, MOFs formed by pyrazole ligands and low-valent transition metal ions also have good stability. A representative example is that in 2011, Long et al.5-Tris (4-pyrazolyl) benzene (H3BTP) as a ligand and transition metal ions Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Co2+ were synthesized as four MOFs,Among them, the structure of Ni3(BTP)2 was not destroyed after soaking in 100 ℃ aqueous solution and pH = 2 ~ 14 (100 ℃) solution for 2 weeks[26]. In 2020, Li et al. Successfully constructed two chemically stable Ni (II) -pyrazoline MOFs: BUT-32 and BUT-33 (BUT = Beijing University of Technology) with conformationally matched elongated pyrazole ligands through isosteric expansion. The two MOFs have the same sodalite-type network, and BUT-33 contains 2.6 nm mesopores.Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that the thermal stability of BUT-32 and BUT-33 can reach 398 ℃ and 380 ℃, respectively. The PXRD of the samples treated in HCl aqueous solution (pH = 3), 4 M NaOH aqueous solution and boiling water for 24 H at room temperature is unchanged, showing high acid/alkali resistance[27]. In 2022, Li et al. Reported a class of double-layer metal-dipyrazolate framework materials, BUT-53 ~ 58, in which BUT-53 ~ 57 remained structurally intact after exposure to air for one year[28]. The framework of BUT-53 ~ 56 and BUT-58 remained stable after soaking in HCl (pH = 5) and NaOH (pH = 14) solutions for 24 H (Fig. 2).
图2 (a) 设计BUT-53~58的晶体工程方法; (b) BUT-53的PXRD图[28]

Fig. 2 (a) The crystal engineering approach used to design BUT-53~58; (b) PXRD patterns of BUT-53[28]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature

Low-valence transition metal ions and triazole ligands can also form highly stable MOFs. In 2020, Zhang et al. Synthesized a series of MOFs: ZnF (a/da/dmTZ) (TZ = 1,2,4-triazolium salt) and its isostructural MOFs by introducing amino groups on the triazole ring and Zn2+. The structure of ZnF (daTZ) (daTZ = 3,5-diamino-1,2,4-triazolium salt) remained unchanged after immersed in boiling water for 5 days, which proved that the MOFs[29] The crystallinity and porosity of the MOFs remained unchanged after soaking in solutions with pH values from 1 to 12 for more than 20 H (Fig. 3), indicating that the MOFs have high chemical stability. In addition, thermogravimetric analysis shows that this kind of MOFs maintains the same framework structure in the range of 340 ~ 440 ℃, which proves that it has high thermal stability. In 2021, Shimizu et al. Reported a material with high capacity and selective adsorption for CO2, CALF-20: (CALF = Calgary Framework), in which the 2D layer composed of 1,2,4-triazole (TZ) -bridged Zn2+ was pillared by oxalate ions to form a 3D structure, and the PXRD characterization and N2 adsorption test of CALF-20 after exposure to 150 ° C vapor for one week showed that its porous structure remained unchanged, indicating that the CALF-20 material has high water stability[30].
图3 (a) ZnF(daTZ)的晶体结构; (b) 不同pH值的酸和碱处理ZnF(daTZ)后的PXRD图[29]

Fig. 3 (a) Crystal structure of ZnF(daTZ); (b) PXRD patterns of ZnF(daTZ) after treatment with acids and bases at various pH values[29]. Copyright 2020, ACS

2.1.2 Stable MOFs constructed by high-valence metal ions.

According to the HSAB theory,High-valence metal ions (Fe3+, Al3+, Cr3+,In3+, Ln3+, Ti4+ and Zr4+, etc.) Is a hard acid,Stable MOFs can be constructed by coordination with O-containing ligands of hard bases. The F FÉrey group was the first to use this strategy to synthesize stable MOFs. In 2002, F F Érey et al. Synthesized a series of 3D MIL-53 frameworks (MIL = Mat Mat Érial Institut Lavoisier) with 1 D diamond-shaped channels using the reaction of trivalent metal ion Cr3+ with H2BDC ligand[31]. In 2004 and 2005, the research group reported two Cr-MOFs with MTN topology: MIL-100 and MIL-101, which have very high water stability and acid/base stability. The high stability of Cr (Ⅲ) -MOFs is mainly due to the high charge/radius ratio of Cr (Ⅲ), the kinetic inertness of Cr (Ⅱ) -O bond and the large ligand field stabilization energy[17][18][32][12,13,21]. In addition to the above MIL series, PCN-426-Cr (Ⅲ) (PCN = Porous Coordination Network) (2014) and PCN-333-Cr (Ⅲ) (2015) MOFs reported by Zhou et al. Can maintain the stability of the framework structure in the pH range of 0 to 11[33][34]. In 2018, Eddaoudi et al. Reported that Cr-soc-MOF-1 has very high water stability, and after up to 100 water vapor adsorption cycles, Cr-soc-MOF-1 can still maintain its structural integrity (Fig. 4)[35]. However, it is difficult to synthesize Cr-MOFs directly, so there are few reports on the de novo synthesis of Cr-MOFs so far, and most of Cr-MOFs are prepared by metal ion exchange after synthesis.
图4 (a) Cr-soc-MOF-1中明确的孔道和笼; (b) 计算和多次水吸附循环后Cr-soc-MOF-1的PXRD图[36]

Fig. 4 (a) The well-defined channels and cages in Cr-soc-MOF-1; (b) the calculated and the experimental PXRD pattern of the Cr-soc-MOF-1 after multiple water adsorption cycles[36]. Copyright 2020, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

In recent years, researchers have also designed and synthesized some stable Al-MOFs. For example, in 2020, Zhang et Al. Reported a 2D tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin aluminum material (Al-MOF), and the PXRD pattern of the Al-MOF did not change after soaking in water for one month, indicating that it had good water stability[37]. In 2022, Manos et Al. Synthesized an Al-MOF-1: [Al (OH) (PATP)] · solvent by solvothermal reaction of AlCl3·6H2O and 2- (2-picolyl) amino terephthalic acid (H2PATP), and the structure of the material did not change after heat treatment at 200 ° C under vacuum, and the PXRD pattern of Al-MOF-1 did not change after treatment in aqueous solution with pH = 2 – 12 (Fig. 5), indicating that the material had high chemical stability[38]. In the same year, Wang et Al. Synthesized a stable Al-MOF: MIL-160 (Al) using 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA), and its thermal stability reached 400 ° C[39]. MIL-160 (Al) material was immersed in water, organic solvents (MeOH, DMF, MeCN, acetone), acidic (pH = 2) and alkaline (pH = 12) aqueous solutions for 24 H, and its PXRD pattern did not change, indicating its high chemical stability. Otherwise, MIL-160 (Al) has an ultrahigh volumetric capacity (227 cm3(STP)/cm3) for acetylene adsorption.
图5 (a) Al-MOF-1的结构; (b) Al-MOF-1用pH = 2~12的水溶液处理后的PXRD图[38]

Fig. 5 (a) The structure of Al-MOF-1; (b) PXRD patterns of Al-MOF-1 after treatment with aqueous solutions ranging from pH = 2~12[38]. Copyright 2022, ACS

Zr4+ is a typical hard acid with high positive charge density and small radius, which has strong affinity with carboxyl oxygen and strong coordination bond, and is easy to form chemically stable MOFs[40]. The most representative example is reported by Lillerud et al. In 2008 that the Zr-MOF:[Zr63-O)43-OH)4(BDC)12](UiO-66,UiO=University of Oslo),UiO-66 constructed by 12-linked [Zr63-O)43-OH)4(CO2)12] clusters and H2BDC ligands can maintain the structural integrity after soaking in aqueous solution at pH = 1 – 14 for 2 H, indicating its ultrahigh chemical stability[20]. In 2020, Huang et al. Constructed a Zr-MOF: PCN-226 with a new topological (ztt) structure by connecting a zigzag ZrO7 chain composed of seven-coordinated Zr4+ and copper (II) tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (CuTCPP). The PXRD pattern of the Zr-MOF did not change after soaking in aqueous solution with pH = 1 ~ 13 for 7 days (Fig. 6), and thermogravimetric analysis showed that it was stable before 400 ℃, indicating that PCN-226 had excellent chemical stability and thermal stability[41]. It is worth mentioning that PCN-226 is highly active for catalyzing the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
图6 (a) PCN-226的结构; (b) ztt拓扑网络; (c) PCN-226(Cu)在pH = 1~13溶液中处理7天后的PXRD图[41]

Fig. 6 (a) The structure of PCN-226; (b) The ztt topological net; (c) PXRD patterns of PCN-226(Cu) after being treated in pH = 1~13 solutions for 7 days[41]. Copyright 2020, ACS

In 2021, Wang et al. Used the hydrothermal reaction of 4,4 ′, 4 ″, 4- (1,4-bis (2,4,5-imidazolyl) phenyl) tetrabenzoic acid (BBI) and ZrCl4 to synthesize a new luminescent Zr-MOF: Zr-BBI[42]. Its thermal stability is up to 375 ℃, and its PXRD pattern remains unchanged after immersion in acidic aqueous solutions of pH = 1 and 6 M HCl for 24 H and alkaline aqueous solutions of pH = 10 ~ 12 for 12 H, showing high chemical stability. In the same year, Huang et al. Used bis [5-di (4-carboxyphenyl) phenyl] porphyrin (BBCPPP) ligand to coordinate with Zr6 cluster to synthesize a new Zr-MOF with csq topology: PCN-625, whose topological network is similar to the well-known PCN-222 and NU-1000 (NU = Northwestern University)[43][44][45]. It was found that the structure of PCN-625 was unchanged after soaking in water, boiling water, n-hexane, acetone, methanol, 6 M HCl and concentrated hydrochloric acid for 72 H, showing high chemical stability (Fig. 7). However, the intensity of the PXRD peak decreased significantly after immersion in 2 M NaOH aqueous solution for 72 H. In addition, PCN-625 can be used as a heterogeneous catalyst for size-selective hetero-Diels-Alder [4 + 2] cycloaddition.
图7 (a) 8-连接Zr6簇和4-连接的BBCPPP构筑的PCN-625; (b) 不同溶液浸泡PCN-625后的PXRD图[43]

Fig. 7 (a) Construction of PCN-625 using an 8-connected Zr6 cluster and 4-connected BBCPPP ligand; (b) PXRD patterns of soaked PCN-625 in different solutions[43]. Copyright 2021, ACS

In 2021, Gao et al. Selected 2,2 ′, 6,6 ′ -tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) -4,4 ′ -bipyridine (H4TCPBP) ligand and 12-linked [Zr63-O)43-OH)4(CO2)12] cluster self-assembly to synthesize a new Zr-MOF with positive cooperative protonation: Zr-TCPBP[46]. The thermal stability of Zr-TCPBP is as high as 350 ℃ as shown by temperature-dependent PXRD. Moreover, the framework of Zr-TCPBP remains unchanged after immersion in 6 M HCl aqueous solution at pH = 0 – 11 for 12 H, which proves that the Zr-MOF has excellent chemical stability. Meanwhile, Zr-TCPBP also has pH-sensitive fluorescence and proton-conducting properties. In 2021, Cui et al. Used optically pure 1,1 '-biphenyl-20-crown-6-derived tetracarboxylic acid as a ligand (H4L1-3)[47],
Three chiral porous Zr-MOFs:[Zr6O4(OH)8(H2O)4(L1-3)2](CE-1~3) were synthesized by solvothermal reaction with ZrOCl12·8H2O, respectively. Their thermal stability is up to 400 ℃, and the PXRD peaks of these Zr-MOFs do not change after treatment in boiling water, concentrated HCl and NaOH (pH = 12) solutions for 1 week (Fig. 8), indicating that these materials have high chemical stability and can be used as chiral stationary phases for chiral resolution.
图8 (a) 由4-连接的配体和8-连接的Zr节点构筑的flu-a网络; (b) CE-1在不同条件下的PXRD图[47]

Fig. 8 (a) A flu-a network constructed by 4-connected ligands and 8-connected Zr nodes; (b) PXRD patterns of CE-1 under different conditions[47]. Copyright 2021, ACS

In 2022, Serre et al. Used 3,3 ′, 5,5 ′ -tetracarboxylic acid diphenylmethane (H4mdip) ligand to construct the first 3D Zr-MOF:[Zr63-O)43-OH)4(OAc)0.24(OH)5.76(H2O)5.76(mdip)1.5](MIP-201,MIP=Materials of the Institute of Porous Materials from Paris) with soc-topology network by hydrothermal reaction with ZrCl4 in acetic acid[48]. Temperature-dependent PXRD and thermogravimetric analysis showed that MIP-201 was stable up to 375 ° C. The crystal structure of MIP-201 was not significantly altered after prolonged exposure to boiling water, nicotinic acid, aqua regia, high concentrations of H3PO4, pH = 10 buffer, and NH4OH vapor (Fig. 9). At 77 K, the nitrogen adsorption test was carried out on the sample treated under extremely harsh conditions, and the results showed that the pore channels were still retained, indicating that MIP-201 had extremely high chemical stability. In addition, MIP-201 has excellent heterogeneous catalytic activity and recyclability for the hydrolysis of peptide bonds over a wide pH range.
图9 (a) MIP-201的soc拓扑网络; (b) MIP-201样品经各种化学条件处理后的PXRD图[48]

Fig. 9 (a) The soc topological net of MIP-201; (b) PXRD patterns of MIP-201 samples treated under various chemical conditions[48]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature

In addition to Zr4+, the same family of Ti4+, Hf4+ can also prepare stable MOFs. In 2021, Horcajada et al. Constructed a new 3D porous Ti-MOF:[Ti2O3(C4O4)](IEF-11,IEF=IMDEA Energy Framework) using solvothermal reaction of squaric acid (H2C4O4) ligand and Ti(OBu)4 in isopropanol/acetic acid[49]. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that IEF-11 was stable up to 300 ° C. After IEF-11 was immersed in a solution of pH = 1 ~ 10.5 for 16 H, its PXRD pattern showed that the structure was unchanged (Fig. 10), which proved that IEF-11 had very high chemical stability. It is worth noting that IEF-11 can be used as an effective photocatalyst for water photolysis under simulated sunlight, and the yield of H2 reached 672μmol/gcatalyst within 22 H, which is a new record among MOFs materials, and its catalytic activity for water photolysis did not decrease significantly for at least 10 days. In 2020, Yang et al. Used 4,4 ′, 4 ″, 4- (4,4 ′- (1,4-phenyl) bis (pyridine-2,4,6-yl)) tetracarboxylic acid (H4PBTA) to construct a new 3D Hf-MOF with sqc-a topology: Hf-PBTA via solvothermal reaction with Hf4+[50]. When Hf-PBTA was immersed in pH = 1 ~ 10 solution at room temperature for 48 H, the PXRD pattern showed that the framework did not change, indicating that the material had high chemical stability. In addition, the Hf-PBTA can be used as a self-calibrating dual-emission fluorescence sensor, and shows sensitive detection capability and good selectivity for aromatic sulfonic acid and sulfite.
图10 (a) IEF-11的3D结构; (b) 不同pH值的酸和碱处理IEF-11后的PXRD图[49]

Fig. 10 (a) 3D structure of IEF-11; (b) PXRD patterns of IEF-11 after treatment with acids and bases at various pH values[49]. Copyright 2021, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Compared with common main-group and transition-metal MOFs, Ln-MOFs constructed by lanthanide (Ln3+) metal ions have the advantages of more diverse structures and unique optoelectronic properties. In 2016, Zhu et al. Synthesized a microporous 3D Eu-MOF:(Me2NH2)[Eu(ox)2(H2O)]·3H2O with dia topology in high yield by one-step reaction of inexpensive oxalic acid (H2ox) with Eu3+ metal ions in water at room temperature[51]. The thermal stability of the material is 335 ℃, and the PXRD patterns of the samples do not change when they are immersed in water at room temperature for 3 days, in boiling water for 1 day, and in aqueous solution at pH = 4 for 4 H, respectively, indicating that the Eu-MOF has high water stability and acid resistance. The MOF has the characteristic red fluorescence of Eu3+ and can be used as a sensitive sensor for fluorescence detection of Cu2+ ions in aqueous solution. Otherwise, this Eu-MOF exhibited high proton conductivity (2.73×10-3S·cm-1) at 55 ° C and 95% relative humidity (RH). In 2017, Zhu et al. Used 2,2 ′ -disulfo-4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid as a ligand (H4L4) to react with a series of Ln3+ metal ions solvothermally to synthesize an isostructural 3D LnMOFs:(Me2NH2)[LnL4(H2O)](Ln=Eu(1),Gd(2),Tb(3),Dy(4)) with a bnn topological network[52]. These LnMOFs materials are stable up to 350 ° C. When the samples are immersed in water at room temperature for three months and in aqueous solutions with pH = 4 to 12 for 1 H, their PXRD patterns show that the structure is maintained (Fig. 11), indicating that the LnMOFs have extremely high water stability and good chemical stability. Among them, 1 and 3 show the characteristic fluorescence of Eu3+ and Tb3+, respectively, while 2 and 4 show relatively weak antiferromagnetic coupling. The proton concentration and porosity of this LnMOFs are reduced due to the coordination of sulfonic acid groups with Ln3+ ions, resulting in only a very low proton conductivity (4.14×10-8S·cm-1/95%RH) of this material at room temperature. In order to prevent the coordination of sulfonic acid groups and improve the porosity of MOFs, Zhu et al. Designed and synthesized a monosulfonic acid substituted 4,4 '-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid ligand: 2-sulfonic-4,4' -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid (H3L5), using the thermal reaction of H3L5 ligand and Ln3+ ion solvent[53].
图11 (a) 1中沿c轴的1D菱形孔道; (b) 1D无机棒状链[Eu(-CO2)2]n; (c) 3D bnn网络; (d) 水处理LnMOF 1后的PXRD图[52]

Fig.11 (a) 1D rhombus channels in 1 along the c axis; (b) 1D inorganic rod-shaped chain [Eu(-CO2)2]n; (c) the 3D bnn network; (d) PXRD patterns for water-treated LnMOF 1[52]. Copyright 2017, ACS

A series of isomorphic 3D LnMOFs:(Me2NH2)2(H3O)[Ln(L5)2]·8H2O(Ln=Eu(1),Gd(2),Tb(3)) with two-fold interpenetrating dia topology networks were synthesized (Fig. 12). The thermal stability of these LnMOFs is up to 300 ℃, and the PXRD pattern of the samples remains unchanged after soaking in water for 1 day, indicating that the LnMOFs have good water stability. Because the sulfonic acid group in Ln-MOFs is not coordinated and the pore is large, the material exhibits high proton conductivity (8.83×10-3S·cm-1) at 95 ° C and 60% RH, which is about 210,000 times higher than that of Ln-MOFs constructed by 2,2 ′ -disulfonic acid-4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid[52]. More importantly, this high proton conductivity was maintained for 3 days.
图12 H3L5与Ln3+构筑的3D Ln-MOFs[53]

Fig. 12 3D Ln-MOFs constructed from H3L5 and Ln3+[53]. Copyright 2022, RSC

Rare earth clusters can also be used to construct chemically stable Ln-MOFs. In 2021, Li et al. Synthesized nine new 3D microporous Ln-MOFs: PCN-50X (X = 1 – 9) using solvothermal reaction of eight-linked Ln6 clusters (Ln=Eu3+,Y3+,Yb3+) and a series of aromatic tetracarboxylic acid ligands (H4L1~H4L9) and analyzed their topologies in detail, and found three (4,8) -linked new topologies (scu, lxl, jun)[54]. The PXRD patterns of these Ln-MOFs remained unchanged after soaking in water and common organic solvents (acetone, dichloromethane, acetonitrile and methanol) for 24 H, which proved that PCN-50X had good chemical stability. In the same year, Li et al. Synthesized a series of 3D mesoporous Ln-MOFs: PCN-2020 by solvothermal reaction of a 12-linked Secondary Building Unit cluster (Ln=Eu3+,Y3+,Yb3+,Tb3+,Ce3+) and an organic Secondary Building Unit (SBU = Secondary Building Unit) containing pyrene core. The thermal stability of the material was as high as 450 ℃, and the PXRD pattern of the sample was unchanged after soaking in aqueous solution with pH = 1 – 9 for 24 H, which proved that PCN-2020 had excellent chemical stability[55]. Further investigation revealed that PCN-2020 (Ce) could catalyze the cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides, and its catalytic activity remained unchanged after five cycles.

2.1.3 Hydroxamic acid constructed stable MOFs.

Compared with MOFs based on carboxylic acids, MOFs based on hydroxamic acid ligands have higher stability, mainly due to the five-membered ring chelation coordination mode of hydroxamic acid[56]. In 2019, Mart Martí-Gastaldo et al. Reported the first 3D microporous MOF:[Ti2(Hbdha)2(H2bdha)](DMF)0.5(H2O)3.3(MUV-11,MUV=Materials of Universidad de Valencia) constructed by direct solvothermal reaction of p-phenylenedihydroxamic acid (H4bdha) with various Ti4+ salts[57]. The PXRD pattern of the MOF remained unchanged after soaking in the solution of pH = 2 ~ 11 for 24 H, indicating that MUV-11 has good chemical stability. In 2020, Tezcan et al. Synthesized a 3D MOF with tbo topology: Fe-HAF-1 (HAF = Hydroxamate Framework) using 3,3 ′, 5,5 ′ -biphenyl tetrahydroxamic acid (H4BPTH) ligand and FeCl3 solvothermal reaction[58]. PXRD measurements showed that the crystalline structure of Fe-HAF-1 remained unchanged after treatment in polar organic solvents (acetone, acetonitrile, methanol, acetic acid, pyridine, triethylamine), aqueous solutions with pH = 1 – 14, and 5 M NaOH solution for one week, proving the superior chemical stability of Fe-HAF-1 (Fig. 13). Zeta potential measurements showed that Fe-HAF-1 crystals were electronegative above pH = 4. Therefore, Fe-HAF-1 crystals can be used to selectively separate positively charged organic dyes such as methylene blue (MB+), thionine (LV+), and rhodamine B(RB+) in aqueous solution with size selectivity. In 2022, Liu et al. Synthesized a 2D MOF with kag topology: SUM-1 (SUM = Sichuan University Materials) by rapid solvothermal reaction of p-phenylenedihydroxamic acid (Sichuan University Materials) with ZrCl4[59]. PXRD measurement showed that the crystalline structure of SUM-1 remained unchanged after it was treated in aqueous solution with pH = 2 ~ 11 for 24 H, indicating that SUM-1 has high chemical stability.
图13 (a) Fe-HAF-1的球棍图; (b) 不同pH的水溶液处理Fe-HAF-1一周后的PXRD图[58]

Fig. 13 (a) Ball-and-stick representation of Fe-HAF-1; (b) PXRD patterns of Fe-HAF-1 after exposure to aqueous solutions at different pH for one week[58]. Copyright 2020, ACS

2.1.4 Stable MOFs Constructed by Phosphate-Containing Ligands

In recent years, ligands containing phosphonic acid groups have also been used to construct chemically stable MOFs. In 2023, Zhang et al. Used 3,5-dicarboxyphenylphosphonic acid (H4L6) as the main ligand and 1,2-bis (4-pyridyl) ethane (BPE) as the pore partitioning ligand to react with Cu2+ to construct a new 3D Cu-MOF:[Cu(μ2-H2O)(L6)0.5(BPE)0.5]·DMF·2H2O(FJU-112) with sp2 topology[60]. Among them, the phosphonic acid group connects four Cu2+ in a bridging/capping manner to form a Cu4 cluster [Cu4(PO3)22-H2O)2(CO2)4] as a 10-linked node. The thermal stability of FJU-112 can reach 250 ℃, and after soaking in aqueous solution with pH = 2 ~ 12 for 24 H, its PXRD pattern shows that the framework remains unchanged (Fig. 14), which proves that the material has high chemical stability. Since the 3D pore channel in the structure of FJU-112 is divided into several smaller cages and smaller windows by the pore-partitioning ligand BPE, it shows high selectivity for C2H2/CO2 separation and is a promising solid material for C2H2/CO2 separation.
图14 (a) FJU-112的3D结构; (b) 不同pH值的酸和碱处理FJU-112后的PXRD图[60]

Fig. 14 (a) 3D structure of FJU-112; (b) PXRD patterns of FJU-112 after treatment with acids and bases at various pH values[60]. Copyright 2023, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

2.2 Hydrophobic group introduced into ligand

The introduction of more hydrophobic groups on the bridging ligands can reduce the hydrophilicity of MOFs and greatly enhance the stability of MOFs in water. In 2017, Li et al. Used the 8-linked ligand 3,3 ′, 5,5 ′ -tetrakis (3,5-dicarboxyphenyl) -2,2 ′, 4,4 ′, 6,6 ′ -hexamethylbiphenyl (H8tdhb) containing six methyl groups to self-assemble with the classical paddle-wheel-like binuclear copper [Cu2(CO2)4] to construct a 3D MOF:[Cu4(tdhb)(H2O)4]·5DMF(BUT-115) with scu-A topology[61]. BUT-155 can still maintain good crystallinity after water treatment at room temperature for 10 days and boiling water treatment for 1 day, indicating its excellent water stability. Moreover, the PXRD pattern of BUT-155 remains unchanged after the sample is immersed in aqueous solution with pH = 4 ~ 10 for 24 H, which proves that BUT-155 has good chemical stability. In addition, BUT-155 can selectively adsorb aniline in water, and the maximum adsorption capacity is 670 mg/G. BUT-155 can be used to detect aniline in water by naked eyes because the color of MOF sample changes obviously after aniline adsorption. In 2019, Zhang et al. Used 2,6-bis (trifluoromethyl) benzodiimidazole (H2fbdim) as a ligand to react with Cu+ salt in the presence of p-xylene (pX) at room temperature to synthesize a 3D MOF:[Cu2(fbdim)]·pX(MAF-41) with cds topology[62]. The thermal stability of the material is up to 500 ℃, and the PXRD measurement shows that the crystalline structure of MAF-41 remains unchanged after the material is placed in boiling water for one week, in a humid environment (~ 70 RH%) for at least 6 months, and in an aqueous solution with pH = 3 ~ 14 at room temperature for 3 days, which proves that MAF-41 has superhydrophobicity and superhigh chemical stability. The —CF3 group contained on the ligand H2fbdim is the main reason for enhancing the stability of this MOF. More importantly, MAF-41 has a rare Intermediate size molecular sieve (iSMS = intermediate-sized molecular sieving) effect, which can selectively adsorb styrene in the mixture of ethylbenzene/styrene/toluene/benzene, and the adsorption selectivity is as high as 3300.
In 2019, Su et al. Designed and synthesized four 3,3 ′ -di (alkyl (R) oxy) -4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acids (R = ethyl, n-butyl, n-hexyl, and n-octyl), and adopted these ligands (H2Ln,n=7~10) to react with ZrCl4 in trifluoroacetic acid solvothermally to synthesize a series of 3D MOFs isostructural with UiO-67: UiO-67-Rs (Fig. 15)[63]. Among them, UiO-67-C6 and UiO-67-C8 can maintain crystalline structure after 20 days of treatment at 100 ° C in aqueous solution with pH ranging from 1 to 12, indicating their ultrahigh chemical stability. Water contact angle measurements showed that both UiO-67-C6 and UiO-67-C8 are superhydrophobic, and the reason is that the longer alkyl chain on the bridging ligand can both protect the hydrophilic Zr6O8 clusters (nodes of MOFs) and increase the roughness of the crystal surface of MOFs (similar to lotus leaves). In addition, the alkyl chain on the framework also makes the pores of the superhydrophobic MOFs lipophilic, which will have important applications in the fields of oil-water separation and water purification. Based on these research works, in 2022, Su et al. Designed and synthesized a 3,3 ′, 5,5 ′ -tetramethyl-4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid (H2L11) and a 2-amino-4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid (H2L12). By using the solvothermal reaction of these two ligands with ZrCl4 respectively, the authors first synthesized 3D MOFs isostructural with UiO-67: UiO-67-4Me and UiO-67-NH2[64]. Then a series of 3D MOFs:UiO-67-4Me-NH2-x%(x=29,38,47,59,67 containing mixed ligands (L11 and L12) were constructed by solvent-assisted ligand exchange method, representing the proportion of L12 ligands). Among them, the thermal stability of UiO-67-4Me-NH2-38% is as high as 420 ℃, and it still keeps crystalline structure after being treated in aqueous solution with pH = 2 ~ 12 at 80 ℃ for 14 days, which proves that it has high chemical stability. However, its static water contact angle is only 39.4 °, and it is no longer superhydrophobic. Very interestingly, at 45% – 65% RH (the most livable humidity), UiO-67-4Me-NH2-38% exhibits an ideal S-shaped water adsorption isotherm, the highest water adsorption working capacity/efficiency, and preferential capture of harmful gases, which has potential applications in the field of indoor humidity regulation and air purification.
图15 由Zr6O8簇和3,3'-二(烷氧基)-4,4'-联苯二甲酸构筑的超疏水UiO-67-Rs[63]

Fig. 15 Construction of superhydrophobic UiO-67-Rs from Zr6O8 clusters and 3,3'-dialkyloxy-4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylic acids (H2Ln, n = 7~10)[63]. Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

In addition to alkyl groups, the introduction of other hydrophobic substituents (e.g., —NO2, — Br, — F, etc.) to the bridging ligands can also improve the water resistance and chemical stability of MOFs[14]. In 2014, Zhu et al. Synthesized a 3D Cu-MOF:[Cu3 L 2 13H2L13) with transition metal Cu2+[65]. The thermal stability of the material is up to 253 ℃, and the PXRD pattern of the sample remains unchanged after soaking in water for 1 day, indicating that the Cu-MOF has good water stability. Intriguingly, the Cu-MOF exhibits an unprecedented, irreversible solvent-induced single-crystal to single-crystal (SC-SC) transformation with bridging coordination water substitution and guest exchange at room temperature, thereby quantitatively producing three daughter crystals :[Cu3 L 2 133-OH)2]·2S(A,S= acetone; B, S = isopropanol; C, S = 2-butanol). The three daughter crystals A ~ C can undergo guest-exchange single crystal-to-single crystal reversible transformation at room temperature with color change. In addition, the material has a quadrangular 1 D pore (10.864 864 Å × 10.484 484 Å), shows excellent separation selectivity for CO2/N2 at room temperature (separation ratio of 128), and is also a better adsorbent for Micro-solid-phase extraction than the currently known marker ZIF-8, and is a potential multifunctional microporous MOF material. In 2021, Zhang et al. Constructed a 3D microporous MOF with pts topology: NKMOF-8-Br (NKMOF = Nankai Metal-Organic Framework) by reacting 2-bromo-4,5-dicyanoimidazole with CuI in acetonitrile at 100 ℃ for one day[66]. The thermal stability of the MOF is up to 300 ℃, and the PXRD patterns of NKMOF-8-Br remain unchanged after soaking in boiling water, alkaline solution (pH = 13) or 5 M HCl aqueous solution at room temperature for more than 2 weeks, indicating that NKMOF-8-Br has excellent water stability and chemical stability. It was further found that NKMOF-8-Br (10 G) could be synthesized in large quantities with high yield (> 90%) by stirring 2-bromo-4,5-dicyanoimidazole, CuI and triethylamine in acetonitrile at room temperature for only 3 min. Most importantly, NKMOF-8-Br has a high C2H6 adsorption capacity and high C2H6/C2H4 adsorption selectivity, enabling efficient separation of C2H6/C2H4 at high humidity to obtain high purity (> 99.99%) polymer-grade ethylene. Therefore, this MOF material has great potential for industrial applications.

2.3 Pore Space Partitioning Using Pore Segmentation Ligand

In general, porous MOFs with large Pore size or large surface area are usually unstable, and a feasible strategy to improve their stability is to insert a Pore-partitioning-ligand of appropriate size into the pores of MOFs.Therefore, large cages or channels are divided into smaller spaces, which can significantly improve the chemical stability of MOFs materials and their adsorption performance for small molecules[14,67]. In 2021, Bu et al. Used this method to insert a 3-node pore segmentation ligand: 2,4,6-tris (4-pyridyl) -1,3,5-triazine (tpt) into MIL-88 MOFs to construct a series of 3D MOFs with pacs topology: CPM-243 (CPM = Crystalline Porous Materials)[68]. Structural characterization shows that CPM-243 contains a 9-linked Cr3O cluster SBU, and it has both Cr — O and Cr — N bonds, so the MOFs can resist both acid and alkali, and the structure remains stable in a wide pH range from pH < 0 to pH > 14 (Fig. 16). Among them, CPM-243 (F) has a thermal stability up to 400 ℃, and its structure remains unchanged in the widest pH range (pH = -1 ~ 15), 12 M HCl and 10 M NaOH, which is the most chemically stable MOF material so far. The ultrahigh chemical stability of CPM-243 (F) has been confirmed by PXRD and gas adsorption experiments.
图16 (a) CPM-243的结构组件及其沿c轴的框架; (b) 精选MOFs的稳定性比较。箭头表示pH < 0或pH > 14的稳定性[68]

Fig. 16 (a) The structural components of CPM-243, together with the framework along the c axis; (b) stability comparison of select MOFs. The arrow indicates stability under pH < 0 or pH > 14[68]. Copyright 2021, ACS

2.4 Post-synthetic exchange method

As an important method for functionalization of MOFs, PSE (Postsynthetic Exchange) method is mainly divided into two types: Metal Metathesis or Ligand Exchange. Exchange by post-synthesis can improve the physical and chemical properties of MOFs or prepare MOFs materials that are difficult to synthesize by direct methods. This strategy can increase the coordination bond strength of unstable SBUs in MOFs, or enhance the water resistance and chemical stability of MOFs without changing the framework structure.

2.4.1 Post synthesis metal ion replacement method

An early example is that in 2014, Zhou et al. Developed a post-synthetic replacement and oxidation strategy of metal nodes to gradually transform unstable 3D MOF: PCN-426-Mg into stable PCN-426-Fe (Ⅲ) and PCN-426- Cr (Ⅲ), which could not be synthesized by direct method[33]. PCN-426-Fe (Ⅲ) can maintain its structural integrity after soaking in water for one day and in aqueous solution with pH = 4 ~ 10, while PCN-426-Cr (Ⅲ) can not change its structure after soaking in 4 M HCl to pH = 12 for at least 12 H, which indicates that the two post-synthesized MOFs have good chemical stability, and the chemical stability of PCN-426- Cr (Ⅲ) is better than that of PCN-.
In 2021, Li et al. Successfully converted a 3D Ni-MOF: BUT-33 (Ni) into a 3D Pd-MOF: BUT-33 (Pd) in deuterated chloroform by post-synthesis metal ion replacement method, while this Pd-MOF material could not be prepared by direct synthesis method[69]. PXRD measurement showed that BUT-33 (Pd) was stable in boiling water, HCl (pH = 3) and 8 M NaOH solution for 1 day (Fig. 17), proving the high chemical stability of this MOF. Because BUT-33 (Pd) retains the mesopores of BUT-33 (Ni) and has open Pd2+ active sites, it not only shows good heterogeneous catalytic performance in organic cross-coupling (such as Suzuki and Heck) reactions, BUT also can photocatalyze the reduction of CO2 to CH4, which is a multifunctional palladium catalyst.
图17 (a) Pd-MOF:BUT-33(Pd)的合成方法; (b) 不同条件处理后BUT-33(Pd)的PXRD图[69]

Fig. 17 (a) Synthetic approach of Pd-MOF: BUT-33(Pd); (b) PXRD patterns of BUT-33(Pd) after different conditions treatments[69]. Copyright 2021, ACS

2.4.2 Postsynthetic ligand exchange method

Compared with the post-synthetic metal ion replacement method, there are relatively few studies on the construction of chemically stable MOFs using the post-synthetic ligand exchange method. In 2018, Tu et al. Used 4-sulfonic acid-2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid (H3SNDC) as a ligand to construct a 3D Zr-MOF:[Zr6O7(OH)(H2O)6(SNDC)2.2(HSNDC)1.8(HCO2)]·2.2C2H8N·12.5H2O(reo-MOF-1) with reo topology with a Zr6O8(H2O)8(CO2)8 cluster.2,6-Naphthalene dicarboxylic acid (H2NDC) was ligand-exchanged with reo-MOF-1 to obtain a new 3D Zr-MOF:[Zr6O7(OH)(H2O)6(NDC)4.38(HSNDC)0.62]·3.27H2O(reo-MOF-1A),reo-MOF-1A with not only high BET surface area (2104 m2·g-1)Moreover, the cuboctahedral cage (23 23 Å) and part of the sulfonic acid group of the original MOF were retained, so reo-MOF-1A showed higher heterogeneous catalytic activity than reo-MOF-1 in the Brnsted acid-catalyzed reaction, and its catalytic activity did not decrease significantly after five times of reuse, indicating that reo-MOF-1A has good chemical stability[70]. In the same year, Liu et al. Used 2-methyl-4,4 ′ -terphenyl dicarboxylic acid (H2TPDC-Me) as a ligand to construct a 3D Zr-MOF: UiO-68-Me by solvothermal reaction with Zr6O4(OH)4(CO2)12 cluster, and then ligand-exchanged different Chiral M (salen) ligands H2LM with UiO-68-Me to synthesize a series of UiO-68 type chiral MOFs:UiO-68-M(M=Cu2+,Fe3+,Cr3+,Mn3+,V4+), which could not be prepared by direct synthesis method (CMOFs = Chiral MOFs)[71]. The thermal stability of these CMOFs was up to 400 ℃, and the PXRD patterns of these CMOFs remained unchanged when they were treated in boiling water, 3 M HCl, and NaOH solution (pH = 12) for 24 H, respectively (Fig. 18), proving that these CMOFs also had high chemical stability. In addition, UiO-68-M showed excellent heterogeneous asymmetric catalytic activity and enantioselectivity in the cyanosilylation of aldehydes, the ring opening of epoxides, and the aminolysis of stilbene oxide, and did not significantly lose its asymmetric catalytic activity and enantioselectivity after 10 cycles. In 2019, Zhou et al. Developed a sequential ligand-reloading strategy and successfully constructed a series of isostructural MOFs with enlarged and reduced lattices[72]. The authors first synthesized a parent MOF: UiO-67.5 using 4,4 '-azophthalic acid (L10=13.24Å) and a 12-linked Zr6 cluster, and then used an equal-length ligand containing a labile imine bond, 4- (N-4-carboxybenzylidene) iminobenzoic acid (L10'=13.12Å), to react with UiO-67.5 by post-synthetic ligand exchange.An unstable non-interpenetrating Zr-MOF: PCN-161 was prepared, and then a longer ligand 4,4 ′ ′ -terphthalic acid (L11=15.70Å) was exchanged with PCN-161 by post-synthetic ligand exchange, and a lattice enlarged Zr-MOF: UiO-68 was synthesized by SC-SC transformation. Similarly, if a shorter ligand, 4,4 ′ -biphenyl dicarboxylic acid (L0=11.0Å), was subjected to post-synthetic ligand exchange with PCN-161, a lattice reduced Zr-MOF: UiO-67 could be obtained. Importantly, the Zr-MOFs (UiO-67 and 68) synthesized based on this strategy have high water resistance and chemical stability. In 2022, Cao et al. First synthesized a 3D porous Cd-MOF:[Cd3La(bpy)]·5DMA·15H2O(1) with 2- (2-hydroxypropionamido) terephthalic acid (H2La) and 4,4 '-bipyridine (bpy) as ligands by solvothermal reaction with Cd2+.Subsequently, a series of MOFs isostructural to Cd-MOF 1 were successfully prepared by solvent-assisted ligand exchange with four terephthalic acid ligands containing different substituents: 2- (propionamido) terephthalic acid (H2Lb), 2- (acetamido) terephthalic acid (H2Lc), 2-aminoterephthalic acid, and terephthalic acids (H2Le), respectively: 2 – 5[73]. As the length of the side chain substituent becomes smaller, the pore channels of these ligand-exchanged MOFs materials become larger, and the adsorption performance of CO2 becomes better.
图18 (a) 通过H2LM的后合成交换法将非手性UiO-68-Me转化为手性UiO-68-M; (b) UiO-68-Cu在不同溶液中处理24 h后的PXRD图[71]

Fig. 18 (a) The as-synthesized achiral UiO-68-Me was converted to chiral UiO-68-M via PSE of H2LM; (b) PXRD patterns of UiO-68-Cu after treatment in different solutions for 24 h[71]. Copyright 2018, ACS

2.5 Hydrophobic surface treatment

Although the above methods can improve the water stability of MOFs to a certain extent, they are still limited by the types of MOFs or the blockage of MOFs pores. Therefore, researchers have recently developed methods to improve the water stability of MOFs by hydrophobic treatment of their surfaces. In 2020, Jiang et al. Developed a simple, mild and general method for hydrophobic treatment of the surface of MOFs, that is, coating a thin layer of hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane polymer on the outer surface of MOFs materials, thus effectively reducing the attack of water molecules on metal clusters and improving the water stability of MOFs[74]. The authors polymerized 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate and 3- (methacrylate) propyltrimethoxysilane on the surface of water-sensitive MOFs: HKUST-1, ZIF-67, and MIL-125, respectively, to prepare composites HKUST-1-P, ZIF-67-P, and MIL-125-P with a hydrophobic polymer layer coated on the surface of MOFs. Among them, HKUST-1-P not only maintains the original morphology and porous characteristics of HKUST-1, but also has high water stability and hydrophobicity (Fig. 19). Strikingly, HKUST-1-P can catalyze the synthesis of benzimidazole and the Knoevenagel condensation reaction involving benzaldehyde in water and exhibits excellent heterogeneous catalytic activity and recyclability. This method provides a simple and versatile route for the synthesis of water-stabilized MOFs-based composites.
图19 (a) 在HKUST-1表面一步聚合制备疏水HKUST-1-P复合材料的示意图; (b) HKUST-1和HKUST-1-P在水中处理3天前后的PXRD图[74]

Fig. 19 (a) Scheme showing the one-step surface polymerization of HKUST-1 to afford hydrophobic HKUST-1-P composite; (b) PXRD profiles of HKUST-1 and HKUST-1-P before and after treatment in water for 3 days[74]. Copyright 2020, Chinese Chemical Society

2.6 Other methods

In addition to the above methods, researchers have also improved the chemical stability of MOFs by enhancing the rigidity of ligands and increasing the interpenetration of networks. In 2019, Li et al. Used three series of rotamers with the same number of connections but different flexibility as ligands to self-assemble with 8- or 12-connected Zr6O4(OH)4(-CO2)n(n=8 or 12) clusters, respectively, to construct 13 3D Zr-MOFs with different topologies and channels, and systematically studied the effect of ligand rigidity on the stability of the resulting MOFs[75]. It was found that the rigidity of the rotameric ligand had a great influence on the stability of the MOFs constructed by it, and the MOFs constructed by the most rigid ligand had the highest water stability and chemical stability. In 2020, Zhao et al. Used tetracarboxylic acid ligands (H4L14) with spirobifluorene ring centers to self-assemble with Zr6 or Ln6 clusters, respectively, to construct an interpenetrating 3D Zr-MOF:[Zr63-O)43-OH)4(L14)3]·(solv)x(Zr-IAM-4,IAM=Institute of Advanced Materials,solv=solvent) with ftw topology and a series of isostructural 3D Ln-MOFs:(DMA)2[Eu63-OH)8(L14)3]·(solv)x(Ln-IAM-4,Ln=Eu,Tb,Gd,Dy,Tm,Yb,Nd,Er,DMA= dimethylammonium ions)[76].
Among them, Zr-IAM-4 is thermally stable up to 450 ° C, while Eu-IAM-4 is thermally stable up to 500 ° C. The samples of Zr-IAM-4 and Eu-IAM-4 were immersed in common solvents (dichloromethane, acetone, methanol and acetonitrile) and boiling water for 24 H, respectively, and their PXRD patterns were unchanged. Moreover, the structure of Zr-IAM-4 does not change in pH = 12 and concentrated hydrochloric acid within one day, while the structure of Eu-IAM-4 remains unchanged after treatment in acid/alkali solution with pH = 3 ~ 11 for one day (Fig. 20), which proves that Zr-IAM- 4 and Eu-IA-4 have high chemical stability. In addition, the interpenetrating Zr-IAM-4 exhibits high CO2 adsorption performance, while the interpenetrating Ln-IAM-4 shows strong characteristic fluorescence in the ultraviolet to near-infrared light region.
图20 (a, b) Zr-IAM-4中的12-连接Zr6节点和螺二芴连接体H4L; (c, d) 不互穿和二重互穿Zr-IAM-4的3D框架; (e) Zr-IAM-4和Eu-IAM-4在沸水和酸、碱溶液中处理24 h后的PXRD图[76]

Fig. 20 (a, b) The 12-connected Zr6 node and the spirobifluorene-linker H4L in Zr-IAM-4; (c, d) 3D framework of Zr-IAM-4 without and with a two-fold interpenetrating structure; (e) PXRD patterns of Zr-IAM-4 and Eu-IAM-4 upon treatment in boiling water and acidic and basic solutions for 24 h[76]. Copyright 2020, ACS

3 Conclusion and prospect

The versatility of MOFs makes them have potential applications in various fields, but many early MOFs materials can not exist stably in the actual environment and can not be applied to the real world. Therefore, the scientific community and industry have been pursuing MOFs materials with high stability. In recent years, the research on chemically stable MOFs has developed vigorously, and researchers have constructed chemically stable MOFs through different strategies such as de novo synthesis or post-synthesis modification.Specifically, it includes the reasonable selection of metal ions or coordination atoms to improve the strength of coordination bonds, the exchange method after synthesis (metal ion replacement or ligand exchange), the introduction of hydrophobic groups into ligands, the use of pores to divide ligands into MOFs pore space, the hydrophobic treatment of MOFs surface, and the increase of interpenetration of MOFs. Based on these methods, more and more new MOFs materials with excellent chemical stability have been synthesized, and these important breakthroughs have brought great encouragement and confidence to the application of MOFs materials in the actual industry. We expect that with the unremitting efforts of researchers, it will no longer be a problem to industrially synthesize MOFs with excellent chemical stability and apply them to the real world.
[1]
Furukawa H, Cordova K E, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi O M. Science, 2013, 341(6149): 1230444.

[2]
Li B, Wen H M, Cui Y J, Zhou W, Qian G D, Chen B L. Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(40): 8819.

[3]
Zhu D R, Zhou J, Yang J, Bao W W, Shen X. J. Nanjing Univ. Tech. Nat. Sci. Ed., 2007, 29(3): 103.

(朱敦如, 周俊, 杨捷, 包魏魏, 沈旋. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(3): 103.).

[4]
Wang J, Zhang Y, Su Y, Liu X, Zhang P X, Lin R B, Chen S X, Deng Q, Zeng Z L, Deng S G, Chen B L. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13: 200.

[5]
Li J, Huang H L, Xue W J, Sun K, Song X H, Wu C R, Nie L, Li Y, Liu C Y, Pan Y, Jiang H L, Mei D H, Zhong C L. Nat. Catal., 2021, 4(8): 719.

[6]
Feng X, Ren Y W, Jiang H F. Prog. Chem., 2020, 32(11): 1697.

(封啸, 任颜卫, 江焕峰. 化学进展, 2020, 32(11): 1697.).

[7]
Li Z H, Zeng H, Zeng G, Ru C Y, Li G H, Yan W F, Shi Z, Feng S H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(51): 26577.

[8]
Lai X Y, Wang Z Y, Zheng Y T, Chen Y M. Prog. Chem., 2019, 31(6): 783.

(赖欣宜, 王志勇, 郑永太, 陈永明. 化学进展, 2019, 31(6): 783.).

[9]
Li H L, Eddaoudi M, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi O M. Nature, 1999, 402(6759): 276.

[10]
Chui S S Y, Lo S M F, Charmant J P H, Orpen A G, Williams I D. Science, 1999, 283(5405): 1148.

[11]
Feng L, Wang K Y, Day G S, Ryder M R, Zhou H C. Chem. Rev., 2020, 120(23): 13087.

[12]
Yuan S, Feng L, Wang K C, Pang J D, Bosch M, Lollar C, Sun Y J, Qin J S, Yang X Y, Zhang P, Wang Q, Zou L F, Zhang Y M, Zhang L L, Fang Y, Li J L, Zhou H C. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(37): 1704303.

[13]
Howarth A J, Liu Y Y, Li P, Li Z Y, Wang T C, Hupp J T, Farha O K. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 1(3): 15018.

[14]
Ding M L, Cai X C, Jiang H L. Chem. Sci., 2019, 10(44): 10209.

[15]
Wang C H, Liu X L, Demir N K, Chen J P, Li K. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45(18): 5107.

[16]
Devic T, Serre C. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43(16): 6097.

[17]
FÉrey G, Serre C, Mellot-Draznieks C, Millange F, SurblÉ S, Dutour J, Margiolaki I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43(46): 6296.

[18]
FÉrey G, Mellot-Draznieks C, Serre C, Millange F, Dutour J, SurblÉ S, Margiolaki I. Science, 2005, 309(5743): 2040.

[19]
Park K S, Ni Z, CôtÉ A P, Choi J Y, Huang R D, Uribe-Romo F J, Chae H K, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi O M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103(27): 10186.

[20]
Cavka J H, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, Guillou N, Lamberti C, Bordiga S, Lillerud K P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(42): 13850.

[21]
Low J J, Benin A I, Jakubczak P, Abrahamian J F, Faheem S A, Willis R R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(43): 15834.

[22]
Kang I J, Khan N A, Haque E, Jhung S H. Chem. Eur. J., 2011, 17(23): 6437.

[23]
Moumen E, Assen A H, Adil K, Belmabkhout Y. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2021, 443: 214020.

[24]
Banerjee R, Phan A, Wang B, Knobler C, Furukawa H, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi O M. Science, 2008, 319(5865): 939.

[25]
Wang Z S, Li M, Peng Y L, Zhang Z J, Chen W, Huang X C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(45): 16071.

[26]
Colombo V, Galli S, Choi H J, Han G D, Maspero A, Palmisano G, Masciocchi N, Long J R. Chem. Sci., 2011, 2(7): 1311.

[27]
He T, Huang Z H, Yuan S, Lv X L, Kong X J, Zou X D, Zhou H C, Li J R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(31): 13491.

[28]
He T, Kong X J, Bian Z X, Zhang Y Z, Si G R, Xie L H, Wu X Q, Huang H L, Chang Z, Bu X H, Zaworotko M J, Nie Z R, Li J R. Nat. Mater., 2022, 21(6): 689.

[29]
Shi Z L, Tao Y, Wu J S, Zhang C Z, He H L, Long L L, Lee Y J, Li T, Zhang Y B. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(6): 2750.

[30]
Lin J B, Nguyen T T T, Vaidhyanathan R, Burner J, Taylor J M, Durekova H, Akhtar F, Mah R K, Ghaffari-Nik O, Marx S, Fylstra N, Iremonger S S, Dawson K W, Sarkar P, Hovington P, Rajendran A, Woo T K, Shimizu G K H. Science, 2021, 374(6574): 1464.

[31]
Serre C, Millange F, Thouvenot C, Noguès M, Marsolier G, Louër D, FÉrey G. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124(45): 13519.

[32]
Seo Y K, Yoon J W, Lee J S, Hwang Y K, Jun C H, Chang J S, Wuttke S, Bazin P, Vimont A, Daturi M, Bourrelly S, Llewellyn P L, Horcajada P, Serre C, FÉrey G. Adv. Mater., 2012, 24(6): 806.

[33]
Liu T F, Zou L F, Feng D W, Chen Y P, Fordham S, Wang X, Liu Y Y, Zhou H C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136(22): 7813.

[34]
Lian X Z, Feng D W, Chen Y P, Liu T F, Wang X, Zhou H C. Chem. Sci., 2015, 6(12): 7044.

[35]
Abtab S M T, Alezi D, Bhatt P M, Shkurenko A, Belmabkhout Y, Aggarwal H, Aggarwal H, Weseliński Ł J, Alsadun N, Samin U, Hedhili M N, Eddaoudi M. Chem, 2018, 4(1): 94.

[36]
Zhang J, Li P, Zhang X, Ma X, Wang B. Acta Chim. Sinica, 2020, 78: 597.

(张晋维, 李平, 张馨凝, 马小杰, 王博. 化学学报, 2020, 78: 597.).

[37]
Jian M P, Qiu R S, Xia Y, Lu J, Chen Y, Gu Q F, Liu R P, Hu C Z, Qu J H, Wang H T, Zhang X W. Sci. Adv., 2020, 6(23): eaay3998.

[38]
Evangelou D, Pournara A, Tziasiou C, Andreou E, Armatas G S, Manos M J. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 61(4): 2017.

[39]
Gu Y M, Qi H F, Sun T T, Liu X W, Qadir S, Sun T J, Li D F, Zhao S S, Fairen-Jimenez D, Wang S D. Chem. Mater., 2022, 34(6): 2708.

[40]
Bai Y, Dou Y B, Xie L H, Rutledge W, Li J R, Zhou H C. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45(8): 2327.

[41]
Cichocka M O, Liang Z Z, Feng D W, Back S, Siahrostami S, Wang X, Samperisi L, Sun Y J, Xu H Y, Hedin N, Zheng H Q, Zou X D, Zhou H C, Huang Z H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(36): 15386.

[42]
Wang X N, Zhang Y, Shi Z X, Lu T T, Wang Q, Li B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13(45): 54217.

[43]
Yang L T, Cai P Y, Zhang L L, Xu X Y, Yakovenko A A, Wang Q, Pang J D, Yuan S, Zou X D, Huang N, Huang Z H, Zhou H C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(31): 12129.

[44]
Feng D W, Gu Z Y, Li J R, Jiang H L, Wei Z W, Zhou H C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51(41): 10307.

[45]
Deria P, Mondloch J E, Tylianakis E, Ghosh P, Bury W, Snurr R Q, Hupp J T, Farha O K. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(45): 16801.

[46]
Yang S L, Li G, Guo M Y, Liu W S, Bu R, Gao E Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(23): 8838.

[47]
Jiang H, Yang K W, Zhao X X, Zhang W Q, Liu Y, Jiang J W, Cui Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(1): 390.

[48]
Wang S J, Ly H G T, Wahiduzzaman M, Simms C, Dovgaliuk I, Tissot A, Maurin G, Parac-Vogt T N, Serre C. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13: 1284.

[49]
Salcedo-Abraira P, Babaryk A A, Montero-Lanzuela E, Contreras-Almengor O R, Cabrero-Antonino M, Grape E S, Willhammar T, NavalÓn S, Elkäim E, García H, Horcajada P. Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(52): 2106627.

[50]
Xing K, Fan R Q, Liu X Y, Gai S, Chen W, Yang Y L, Li J. Chem. Commun., 2020, 56(4): 631.

[51]
Wang X, Qin T, Bao S S, Zhang Y C, Shen X, Zheng L M, Zhu D R. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4(42): 16484.

[52]
Zhao J, He X, Zhang Y C, Zhu J, Shen X, Zhu D R. Cryst. Growth Des., 2017, 17(10): 5524.

[53]
Zhang S L, Xie Y X, Yang M R, Zhu D R. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2022, 9(6): 1134.

[54]
Lv X L, Feng L, Xie L H, He T, Wu W, Wang K Y, Si G R, Wang B, Li J R, Zhou H C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(7): 2784.

[55]
Lv X L, Feng L, Wang K Y, Xie L H, He T, Wu W, Li J R, Zhou H C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60(4): 2053.

[56]
Zhang X, Wang B, Alsalme A, Xiang S C, Zhang Z J, Chen B L. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2020, 423: 213507.

[57]
Padial N M, Castells-Gil J, Almora-Barrios N, Romero-Angel M, da Silva I, Barawi M, García-Sánchez A, de la Peña O’Shea V A, Martí-Gastaldo C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(33): 13124.

[58]
Chiong J A, Zhu J, Bailey J B, Kalaj M, Subramanian R H, Xu W Q, Cohen S M, Tezcan F A. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(15): 6907.

[59]
Lai Q X, Chu Z Q, Xiao X Y, Dai D J, Song T, Luo T Y, Tang W L, Feng X, Zhang Z Y, Li T, Xiao H, Su J, Liu C. Chem. Commun., 2022, 58(22): 3601.

[60]
Xiang F H, Zhang H, Yang Y S, Li L, Que Z N, Chen L J, Yuan Z, Chen S M, Yao Z Z, Fu J W, Xiang S C, Chen B L, Zhang Z J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62(13): e202300638.

[61]
Chen Y, Wang B, Wang X Q, Xie L H, Li J P, Xie Y B, Li J R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(32): 27027.

[62]
Zhou D D, Chen P, Wang C, Wang S S, Du Y F, Yan H, Ye Z M, He C T, Huang R K, Mo Z W, Huang N Y, Zhang J P. Nat. Mater., 2019, 18(9): 994.

[63]
Zhu N X, Wei Z W, Chen C X, Wang D W, Cao C C, Qiu Q F, Jiang J J, Wang H P, Su C Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58(47): 17033.

[64]
Zhu N X, Wei Z W, Chen C X, Xiong X H, Xiong Y Y, Zeng Z, Wang W, Jiang J J, Fan Y N, Su C Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61(4): e202112097.

[65]
Qin T, Gong J, Ma J H, Wang X, Wang Y H, Xu Y, Shen X, Zhu D R. Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(100): 15886.

[66]
Geng S B, Lin E, Li X, Liu W S, Wang T, Wang Z F, Sensharma D, Darwish S, Andaloussi Y H, Pham T, Cheng P, Zaworotko M J, Chen Y, Zhang Z J. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(23): 8654.

[67]
Zhai Q G, Bu X H, Zhao X, Li D S, Feng P Y. Acc. Chem. Res., 2017, 50(2): 407.

[68]
Yang H J, Peng F, Hong A N, Wang Y X, Bu X H, Feng P Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(36): 14470.

[69]
He T, Kong X J, Zhou J, Zhao C, Wang K C, Wu X Q, Lv X L, Si G R, Li J R, Nie Z R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143(26): 9901.

[70]
Nguyen H T T, Tu T N, Nguyen M V, Lo T H N, Furukawa H, Nguyen N N, Nguyen M D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(41): 35462.

[71]
Tan C X, Han X, Li Z J, Liu Y, Cui Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(47): 16229.

[72]
Feng L, Yuan S, Qin J S, Wang Y, Kirchon A, Qiu D, Cheng L, Madrahimov S T, Zhou H C. Matter, 2019, 1(1): 156.

[73]
Cao L H, Yang Y, Tang X H, Wang X, Yin Z. Cryst. Growth Des., 2022, 22(1): 37.

[74]
Ding M L, Jiang H L. CCS Chem., 2021, 3(8): 2740.

[75]
Lv X L, Yuan S, Xie L H, Darke H F, Chen Y, He T, Dong C, Wang B, Zhang Y Z, Li J R, Zhou H C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(26): 10283.

[76]
Duan Z G, Li Y, Xiao X, Huang X L, Li X T, Li Y Y, Zhang C, Zhang H, Li L, Lin Z H, Zhao Y G, Huang W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(16): 18715.

Outlines

/